<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com">
<title>BMJ Open Quality recent issues</title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com</link>
<description>BMJ Open Quality RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:eIssn>2399-6641</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>BMJ Open Quality</prism:publicationName>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e004098?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e004182?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003969?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003388?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e004061?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003974?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003988?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003801?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e004043?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003677?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003878?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003940?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003787?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003738?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003903?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e004013?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003785?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003626?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003740?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003893?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003919?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003977?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e004026?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003806?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003956?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003981?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e004084?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003805?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003909?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003967?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003585?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003963?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003765?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003693?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003720?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003887?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003910?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e004020?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e004040?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003616?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003654?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003848?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003753?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003859?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003665?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003494?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003724?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003746?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003730?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003640?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003972?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003843?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003031?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003639?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003716?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003900?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003949?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003777?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003630?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003815?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e004015?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003595?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003331?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003851?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003925?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003758?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003245?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003842?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003612?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003648?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003387?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003715?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003489?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003727?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003760?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003853?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003465?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003812?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003291?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003666?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003497?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003556?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003891?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003311?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003705?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003689?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A25?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A27?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A28?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A29?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A33?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A39?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A17-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A19-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A19-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A21-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A21-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A24-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A24-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A24-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A35-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A35-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A36-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/i?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A3?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A5?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A8?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A10?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A15?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/Aii?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A1-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A1-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A1-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A1-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A4-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A4-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A6-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A6-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A6-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A7-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A7-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A7-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A7-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A9-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A9-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A11-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A11-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A12-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A12-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A12-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A13-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A13-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A13-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A13-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A16-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A16-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A17-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A17-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003933?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003606?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003827?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003728?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003550?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003525?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003686?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003521?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003542?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003602?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003635?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003658?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003704?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003503?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003622?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003275?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003580?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003604?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003667?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003533?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003511?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003857?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003480?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003013?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003592?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003896?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003555?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003683?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003691?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003706?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003419?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003565?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003600?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003742?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003568?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003379?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003491?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003524?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003576?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003657?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003663?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003531?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003435?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003563?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003416?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003369?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003255?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003470?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003551?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003571?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003407?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003364?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003518?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003459?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003485?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003280?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003462?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003499?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003583?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003601?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003440?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003492?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003325?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003495?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003477?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003615?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003487?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003344?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003553?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003393?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003396?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003423?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003468?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003247?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003319?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003538?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003432?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e002774?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003420?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003431?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003484?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003253?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003323?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003543?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002941?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003443?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002620?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003382?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003473?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003359?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003450?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003144?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003421?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003429?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003501?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003463?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003523?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003196?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003441?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003100?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003386?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003270?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003349?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003456?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002956?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003401?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003417?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003383?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003392?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003248?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003334?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003466?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003271?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003104?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003197?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003303?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003455?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003363?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003505?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003224?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003310?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003134?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002972?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003111?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003345?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003366?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003389?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003400?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002741?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002998?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003328?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003397?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003296?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003378?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003454?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003063?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003391?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003376?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003346?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002840?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003288?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002919?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003097?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003234?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003249?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003282?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002981?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003223?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003256?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003313?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003318?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003023?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003119?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003254?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003390?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A177?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A180?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A181?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A182?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A183?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A191?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A193?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A197?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A198?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A202?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A204?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A205?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A208?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A209?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A212?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A213?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A174-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A176-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A176-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A179-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A179-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A184-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A184-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A185-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A185-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A186-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A186-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A188-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A188-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A189-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A189-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A195-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A195-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A195-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A196-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A196-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A199-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A199-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A200-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A200-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A206-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A206-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A207-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A207-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A210-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A210-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A211-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A211-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A105?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A106?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A111?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A115?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A117?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A119?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A120?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A123?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A126?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A128?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A129?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A130?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A131?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A134?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A135?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A138?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A139?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A141?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A143?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A147?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A153?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A155?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A158?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A160?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A161?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A162?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A163?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A167?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A169?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A102-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A104-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A104-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A107-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A107-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A108-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A108-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A110-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A110-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A112-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A112-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A113-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A113-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A114-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A114-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A116-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A116-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A118-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A118-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A121-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A121-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A122-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A122-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A124-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A124-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A127-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A127-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A132-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A132-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A133-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A133-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A136-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A136-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A137-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A137-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A140-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A140-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A142-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A142-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A146-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A146-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A151-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A151-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A152-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A152-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A154-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A154-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A156-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A156-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A157-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A157-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A159-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A159-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A164-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A164-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A165-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A165-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A165-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A168-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A168-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A170-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A170-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A171-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A171-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A173-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A173-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A174-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A29?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A31?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A35?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A37?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A38?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A39?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A40?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A42?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A44?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A46?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A48?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A49?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A50?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A53?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A56?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A57?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A61?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A62?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A65?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A66?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A69?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A75?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A76?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A77?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A80?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A81?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A83?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A85?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A86?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A87?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A88?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A92?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A95?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A96?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A98?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A100?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A26-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A26-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A28-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A28-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A30-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A30-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A32-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A32-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A34-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A34-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A36-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A36-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A41-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A41-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A45-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A45-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A51-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A51-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A52-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A52-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A54-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A54-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A55-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A55-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A58-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A58-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A59-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A59-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A63-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A63-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A64-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A64-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A67-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A67-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A68-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A68-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A70-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A70-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A71-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A71-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A72-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A72-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A74-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A74-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A79-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A79-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A82-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A82-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A84-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A84-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A89-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A89-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A91-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A91-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A94-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A94-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A97-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A97-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A99-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A99-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A101-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A101-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A102-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A4?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A7?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A11?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A14?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A16?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A17?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A21?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A24?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A1-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A1-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A2-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A2-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A5-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A5-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A6-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A6-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A8-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A8-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A10-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A10-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A12-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A12-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A12-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A13-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A13-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A18-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A18-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A19-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A19-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A20-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A20-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A20-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A22-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A22-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A23-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A23-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A25-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A25-b?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e004098?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving point-of-care ultrasound documentation among emergency medicine residents: a mixed-method implementation research study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e004098?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate the effectiveness of a theory-informed, iterative implementation strategy (IS) to improve point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) documentation compliance among emergency medicine (EM) residents according to American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) guidelines in a high-volume emergency department (ED).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a 19-month (December 2023&ndash;June 2025) mixed-methods implementation study at a tertiary academic ED in India. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change guided six iterative IS phases, including education, co-design, workflow optimisation and audit/feedback. Participants were EM residents. The primary outcome was the proportion of POCUS examinations achieving &ge;80% compliance with ACEP documentation standards. Compliance trends were analysed across phases and summarised using proportions and medians with IQRs. Qualitative data from five focus group discussions were analysed using CFIR to identify barriers, facilitators and mechanisms of change. Quantitative and qualitative findings were integrated using a joint display.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We assessed 3074 POCUS examinations. The proportion of scans achieving &ge;80% compliance increased from 0% at baseline to 35.1% postimplementation. Median compliance rose from 24% (IQR 17&ndash;34) to 69% (IQR 54&ndash;84). Compliance followed a nonlinear trajectory. Initial phases showed minimal gains (0%&ndash;8.7%) due to workflow barriers. A marked acceleration occurred during IS-5 (22.5%) following the introduction of a user-designed, single multimodal form and gamification. Qualitative analysis demonstrated a shift from initial resistance (CFIR: compatibility, complexity) to normalisation (implementation climate), although technical challenges with image archiving persisted.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>User-centred co-design and peer engagement were key to the improvement, although persistent infrastructure challenges limited further gains and highlighted the need for informatics-enabled solutions. This study demonstrates that low-cost, context-sensitive strategies can enhance POCUS documentation effectively in high-volume, resource-constrained EDs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A multifaceted, iterative IS guided by theoretical frameworks significantly improved POCUS documentation compliance. User-centred design and participatory engagement were critical mechanisms for sustainable practice change in a resource-variable EM setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>CTRI/2024/03/063671.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gaayathri, M., Manu Ayyan, S., Nair, N. S., Mohammed Muthanikkatt, A., Reddy Miriyala, P. C., Valiyaveettil Justin, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-11T04:27:16-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-004098</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-004098</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving point-of-care ultrasound documentation among emergency medicine residents: a mixed-method implementation research study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e004098</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e004098</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e004182?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Perceived eye care risk and safety issues identified by optometrists in Scotland: a focus group study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e004182?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Evidence on the nature and scale of risk and safety concerns in optometry practice is very limited, especially compared with other primary care professions. In Scotland, many changes occurred in the profession during and because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The theme of risk and patient safety was, therefore, chosen as the priority focus for the 2022 mandatory national training programme, which optometrists providing General Ophthalmic Services in Scotland are required to undertake.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To explore and identify perceived current and future safety risks and how these might be mitigated in relation to professional optometry practice in Scotland.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Study participants were all registered General Optical Council members from nine of the 14 regional health boards in Scotland. Data were collected via three online focus groups over a 2-month period during 2021 with each comprising six to eight participants. Data were transcribed with permission and then subjected to a basic thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>16 optometrists participated in the study. Six principal themes were generated from the data analysis: (1) current overview and context (eg, perceived increased risk); (2) competency risks (eg, skills and knowledge to manage disease); (3) conduct risks (eg, behaviours of practitioners); (4) contextual risks (eg, environmental issues); (5) future risks (eg, technology) and (6) risk mitigations (eg, education and training).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Optometrists participating in this study expressed concerns that the level of perceived clinical risk in the Optometry profession is increasing, mainly related to technology, scope of practice, role development and changes in consumer demand. Multiple recommendations are made to minimise reported risks including education for new roles; increased focus on improving care quality; support to those involved in safety incidents and complaints; taking a systems approach to areas of high risk and sharing good practices.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Armstrong, D., Graham, J., Rousselet, L., Bowie, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-10T02:44:02-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2026-004182</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2026-004182</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Perceived eye care risk and safety issues identified by optometrists in Scotland: a focus group study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e004182</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e004182</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003969?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Wrong-side imaging orders: automated detection using electronic health record data - a retrospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003969?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Wrong-side diagnostic imaging order errors are preventable errors that can delay diagnosis and cause patient harm yet remain underdetected due to limitations in existing reporting systems.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To develop and validate an automated electronic health record (EHR)-based method for detecting potential wrong-side diagnostic imaging order errors using an adapted Retract-and-Reorder (RAR) approach and to identify associated risk factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Six-facility health system comprising inpatient, outpatient and emergency room sites.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We screened 355 000 imaging orders with side specified, placed during 2021 across our healthcare system. We adapted the RAR methodology, originally developed to detect near-miss medication errors, by extending detection windows to 24 hours and identifying any orders switching from one side to the contralateral side, accounting for multiprovider workflows inherent in imaging. We validated the method through chart review of 100 randomly selected RAR events, then applied the query across all imaging orders. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with RAR events.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We identified 1667 RAR events (4.70 per 1000 orders). Validation yielded a positive predictive value of 87% (95% CI 79.0% to 92.2%), estimating 4.09 confirmed wrong-side errors per 1000 orders. The odds of an RAR event were significantly higher in outpatient settings compared with inpatient settings (OR 4.53; 95% CI 3.80 to 5.42) and among administrative staff compared with attending physicians (OR 2.08; 95% CI 1.73 to 2.49). CT scans showed 79% higher odds of an RAR event compared with X-rays (OR 1.79; 95% CI 1.34 to 2.39).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This validated approach offers a scalable solution for automated detection of potential wrong-side diagnostic imaging order errors. The methodology leverages commonly available EHR data to support continuous surveillance and intervention evaluation for improved diagnostic safety.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kneifati-Hayek, J. Z., Peabody, I., Baillie, C., Park, J., Gu, T., Elias, J., Hentel, K., Kang, S., Weng, C., Shelton, R. C., Weintraub, J., Rinke, M., Fertel, B. S., Adelman, J. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-05T04:05:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003969</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003969</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Wrong-side imaging orders: automated detection using electronic health record data - a retrospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003969</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003969</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003388?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Decreasing patient appointment waiting days for ultrasound diagnosis in Saint Peter Specialized Hospital: a quality improvement project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003388?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Ultrasound examination turnaround time refers to the duration from when a clinician orders the test to when results are reported. In many public hospitals, limited workforce capacity, inefficient workflows and unstructured scheduling contribute to prolonged waiting times for diagnostic imaging. Timely ultrasound diagnosis is essential for appropriate clinical decision-making and patient flow. This project aimed to reduce excessive waiting times for ultrasound appointments in a high-volume public hospital</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A Quality Improvement (QI) project was conducted in the Radiology Department of Saint Peter Specialized Hospital between August and November 2022. The aim was to reduce the median waiting time for ultrasound appointments from 28 days to less than 5 days. A root cause analysis (RCA) identified key contributors, including delayed start times, absence of structured scheduling, workflow interruptions and limited machine availability. Driver diagrams and prioritisation matrices informed intervention selection and tested through sequential Plan&ndash;Do&ndash;Study&ndash;Act (PDSA) cycles. Interventions included workflow optimisation, extended effective working hours, productivity enhancement, structured appointment scheduling and deployment of point-of-care ultrasound for emergency cases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The maximum waiting time for senior radiologist ultrasound appointments decreased from 28 days to &le;5 working days. The backlog for technologist-led examinations was eliminated. Daily productivity increased from 10 to 48 scans per radiologist and from 18 to 65 scans per technologist. Run charts demonstrated progressive and sustained improvement across four PDSA cycles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion and recommendations</st>
<p>The QI project achieved significant reductions in ultrasound waiting times through organisational and workflow redesign without additional funding. Sustainability relied on staff engagement, leadership support and embedding new practices into routine operations. These low-cost, context-appropriate strategies may be applicable to other resource-constrained hospitals facing similar challenges.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dagne Moges, D., Dereje Leuleberehan, D., Dilo, Z. S., Menerba, A. T., Awoll, I. H., Wotango, B. Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T07:40:35-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003388</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003388</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Decreasing patient appointment waiting days for ultrasound diagnosis in Saint Peter Specialized Hospital: a quality improvement project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003388</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003388</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e004061?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Working to enhance HIV care: integrating implementation science and improvement science for effective quality improvement - a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e004061?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Healthcare systems struggle to balance the need for frontline problem-solving with the requirement for theory-driven strategies that ensure sustainable system-wide improvement. Implementation science, improvement science and quality improvement have emerged as complementary approaches to bridge gaps between evidence and practice, yet their integration remains limited. This scoping review examines how these disciplines intersect and can be applied to enhance HIV care delivery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed articles published between 2016 and 2025. From an initial identification of 244 articles, 18 core studies were selected for snowball sampling, resulting in a pool of 113. After screening for accessibility and relevance, 30 studies were included in the final review that explicitly addressed overlaps between implementation science, improvement science and quality improvement. Data were charted on study objectives, methodologies, frameworks and relevance to healthcare improvement, and synthesised to identify common themes, models and barriers to integration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The integration of these three disciplines creates a robust framework for health system change: implementation science emphasises fidelity and evidence-based uptake, improvement science prioritises generalisable knowledge and quality improvement enables rapid, local problem-solving. Their combined application can enhance the scalability, sustainability and efficiency of interventions. Models such as the HIV/AIDS Bureau Implementation Science Model, Reach-Effectiveness-Adoption-Implementation-Maintenance and the Learning Evaluation framework illustrate practical integration, showing how iterative quality improvement efforts can inform broader implementation strategies. Barriers include siloed approaches, variable terminology and limited organisational capacity, highlighting the need for cross-disciplinary collaboration, training and infrastructure support.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Integrating implementation science, improvement science and quality improvement provides a pathway to accelerate evidence translation, strengthen system-wide healthcare quality and improve patient-centred outcomes in HIV care. Synthesising shared principles and alignment opportunities offers actionable guidance for healthcare systems seeking to leverage the strengths of each discipline for more effective, scalable and sustainable care delivery.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[OGrady, T., Pendill, M., Urry, M., Itum, T., Rahman, R., Steinbock, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T07:40:35-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-004061</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-004061</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Working to enhance HIV care: integrating implementation science and improvement science for effective quality improvement - a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e004061</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e004061</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003974?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[HOME, the heart of healing: advancing patient safety beyond the hospital]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003974?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Timely and coordinated care transitions from hospital to home are vital to ensuring patient safety and satisfaction, especially among chronically ill and high-risk patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Local problem</st>
<p>At Armed Forces Hospitals&ndash;Taif Region (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia), delays in referral to assessment by home healthcare (HHC) services led to delay in the initiation of HHC falling short of global standards.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This quality improvement project aimed to enhance the transition pathway from hospital to home care and to assess the effect of the intervention on the 30-day readmission rate and patient satisfaction among chronic patients requiring HHC follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This initiative, implemented between September 2024 and June 2025, used the Lean Six Sigma methodology (Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve and Control), the 4P patient experience model and the strength-based clinical case management model to design and implement a structured care transition pathway that included early electronic referral alerts, standardised discharge workflows, predischarge HHC assessments, individualised care plans, transition navigators, centralised coordination, virtual follow-up clinics and weekly multidisciplinary rounds.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The timely initiation of HHC improved from 51% to 89.4% for high-priority patients and 71% to 92% for low-priority patients through improving referral to HHC initiation prior to discharge, and patient satisfaction increased from 46% to 91%. The average 30-day readmission rate declined from 35.8% to 7.7%. This translated into estimated cost savings of SAR4 960 536&ndash;4 982 136 (US$1 322 809&ndash;1 328 569), attributed primarily to avoided bed-days for preventable readmissions. There was a decrease in emergency department visits with the monthly average decreasing from 2.2 visits to 1.0 visits, representing a 54.5% reduction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Embedding structured transition workflows and leveraging multidisciplinary collaboration significantly improved care continuity, safety and outcomes for chronic patients transitioning from hospital to home.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al Harbi, S., Obaidallah, N., Aljuaid, E., Diamat, K., Selvaraj, S., Tolentin, H., Alzobidi, F., Alshowaier, N., Alharthi, N., Baldovino, F. L., Raviz, K. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01T04:49:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003974</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003974</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[HOME, the heart of healing: advancing patient safety beyond the hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003974</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003974</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003988?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multidisciplinary approach to reducing falls for people with dementia on an older adult mental health ward]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003988?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Falls can present a significant cost to individuals, their loved ones and the healthcare system. People with dementia on inpatient wards are at increased risk of falls, making this an important patient safety issue.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>The aim of the project was to reduce falls rate on an older adult mental health ward by 30% (from an average of 5.4 to 3.7 per 1000 occupied bed days) by September 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Using quality improvement methodology, a multidisciplinary team tested interventions to enhance therapeutic engagement, strengthen supportive nursing observations, mitigate medication-related risks and improve the ward environment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The project surpassed its aim, reducing falls rate by 74% to 1.4 falls per 1000 occupied bed days.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This project demonstrated the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to falls reduction, as well as the value of employing Plan-Do-Study-Act methodology for rapid testing and learning.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sorlie, C., Shields, G., Connellan, T., Addo, N., Aurelio, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01T04:49:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003988</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003988</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multidisciplinary approach to reducing falls for people with dementia on an older adult mental health ward]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003988</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003988</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003801?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Racial and ethnic diversity in clinical studies reported to ClinicalTrials.gov, 2009-2024]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003801?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>A lack of transparent reporting of race and ethnicity in clinical research limits the ability to identify health inequities and evaluate to what extent clinical research includes diverse populations. Our objectives are: (1) to identify study characteristics associated with reporting race and ethnicity of clinical study participants and (2) to document temporal trends in race and ethnicity reporting on ClinicalTrials.gov.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional analysis of interventional trials and observational studies from 2009 to 2024; multivariable logistic regression assessed study-level factors associated with reporting race and ethnicity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Global registry of clinical studies (ClinicalTrials.gov).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>58 163 studies with posted results and without early termination.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Exposures</st>
<p>Study characteristics: sponsor trial phase, study type and country.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcomes and measures</st>
<p>Reporting of race, reporting of ethnicity, reporting of both.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 58163 studies (mean enrolment=1215 participants), 44.8% did not report race or ethnicity to the repository (mean enrolment=1481 participants). The proportion of studies reporting both race and ethnicity rose from 7.4% in 2013 to 54.6% in 2024. In multivariable models, observational studies had lower odds of reporting race and ethnicity (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.61) compared with interventional trials. Phase 4 trials were least likely phase to report race and ethnicity (OR=0.32; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.35), and studies with only National Institute of Health funding were more likely to report race and ethnicity compared with studies with any industry funding or sponsorship (OR=1.70, 95% CI 1.61 to 1.79). For studies that reported race, White participants comprised &ge;50% each year based on study-level percentages; proportions of Asian participants declined, and Black participants fluctuated. &lsquo;Not Hispanic or Latino&rsquo; remained &ge;80% of reported ethnicity annually.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Race and ethnicity reporting on ClinicalTrials.gov has improved markedly yet remains incomplete, with shortfalls in late-phase and observational studies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aziz, M., OBrien, E. C., Lusk, J. B., Krishnamurthy, S., Garcha, V., Brookhart, M. A., Califf, R. M., Green, M. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-29T07:34:02-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003801</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003801</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Racial and ethnic diversity in clinical studies reported to ClinicalTrials.gov, 2009-2024]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003801</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003801</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e004043?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[From local change to scholarly contribution: lessons from a scoping review of the gaps and pitfalls of QI reports]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e004043?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Quality improvement reports (QIRs) are important for disseminating real-world interventions in healthcare. However, as a relatively new genre of scholarly writing, QIRs vary widely in clarity, methodological rigour and scholarly contribution. Despite the availability of reporting frameworks such as Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) V.2.0, key elements&mdash;such as methodological rigour, contextual detail and rationale for interventions&mdash;are often under-reported or poorly articulated. This study aimed to (1) identify best practices in publishing QIRs and (2) examine common methodological strengths and weaknesses in project design and execution.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a scoping review using the six-stage framework by Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley. A purposeful sample of 71 QIRs published in 2019 across three leading quality improvement (QI) journals&mdash;<I>BMJ Quality &amp; Safety, BMJ Open Quality</I> and <I>Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety</I>&mdash;was analysed. Data extraction was guided by SQUIRE V.2.0 and supplemented by additional best practices. Return-of-findings sessions with QI scholars, journal editors, frontline practitioners and an international QI conference audience refined the findings and ensured practical relevance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Most QIRs described a local problem and intervention but only 22% articulated strong aim statements with measurable targets. Two-thirds referenced a QI methodology but many descriptions of common QI tools lacked rigour. Process and balancing measures were often missing or inadequately justified. While Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were commonly reported, few met criteria for &lsquo;authenticity&rsquo;. Data analysis and display methods varied, with several common weaknesses. Discussion sections frequently lacked depth and contextual factors&mdash;critical for reproducibility&mdash;were inconsistently described. Eight core lessons emerged to support more rigorous, transparent and impactful reporting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>As an emerging genre of scholarly communication, many QIRs still fall short in conveying methodological rigour and transferable insights. This review provides practical recommendations, illustrated by strong examples, to help authors and educators improve the clarity and impact of QIRs across healthcare settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spicer, E., Gob, A., Bishop, K. A., McIntyre, N., Goldszmidt, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-25T06:07:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-004043</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-004043</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[From local change to scholarly contribution: lessons from a scoping review of the gaps and pitfalls of QI reports]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e004043</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e004043</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003677?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient perspectives of multimodal prehabilitation for ovarian cancer with surgical intent: a multicentre qualitative evaluation of acceptability, barriers and facilitators for participation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003677?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To carry out a qualitative evaluation of personalised, multimodal prehabilitation for patients with advanced ovarian cancer in the UK, to inform the design and implementation of future programmes worldwide.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A multicentre, qualitative exploration of patients with advanced (stage III&ndash;IV) ovarian cancer with a surgical intent to treatment, who had been referred to a UK National Health Service prehabilitation programme. Using a purposive, maximum variation sampling approach, patients were invited to complete a semi-structured interview about their views and experiences of multimodal prehabilitation (exercise, nutritional, psychological and medical optimisation interventions). The interview focused on acceptability, perceived usefulness of the service and barriers and facilitators to engagement and adherence. Interviews were conducted virtually. Audio recordings of interviews were transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed thematically.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Interviews were completed with 21 patients, with a median age of 56.5 years (range 37&ndash;89 years). Four main themes were identified with associated subthemes as follows: (1) introduction to the programme (timing, volume and content of information), (2) perceived need (support system and mindset, psychological and physical health), (3) delivery of the programme (convenience of appointments, accessibility of staff, family involvement, individual components of the intervention; ie, physical, psychological, nutritional interventions and group work) and (4) future engagement (addressing postsurgical gynaecological health and closure).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Overall, prehabilitation was acceptable to patients with advanced ovarian cancer who had been referred to a multimodal prehabilitation programme. Perceived accessibility of staff and inclusion of patients&rsquo; social network facilitated engagement. Lack of perceived need for prehabilitation was a barrier to participation, particularly for those with a strong support system or self-confessed strong physical and psychological baseline fitness. Effective patient-centred communication about prehabilitation could support patients with making informed choices about engagement in prehabilitation as part of their care plan.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McMullan, J. C., Williams, D., Phillips, R., Frost, J., Newton, C., Jones, R., Jones, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T06:47:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003677</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003677</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient perspectives of multimodal prehabilitation for ovarian cancer with surgical intent: a multicentre qualitative evaluation of acceptability, barriers and facilitators for participation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003677</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003677</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003878?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving pneumococcal vaccination uptake in a residency clinic: a case-inspired QI initiative aligned with updated CDC guidelines]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003878?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><I>Streptococcus pneumoniae</I> remains a leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality among adults, particularly those with chronic medical conditions, yet pneumococcal vaccination uptake in adult populations remains suboptimal. Residency-based primary care clinics face unique barriers to preventive care delivery, including staffing instability and competing clinical priorities. After identifying pneumococcal vaccination rates in our internal medicine residency clinic that were lower than the national average, we conducted a quality improvement initiative to increase vaccination uptake. Using Plan&ndash;Do&ndash;Study&ndash;Act cycles from September 2024 through February 2025, we implemented targeted, system-level interventions including certified medical assistant&ndash;led pre-queuing of pneumococcal vaccine orders, passive patient education via waiting room slideshows and quick response (QR) codes, and structured resident reminders through daily huddles and email reinforcement. Vaccination rates were tracked bi-weekly using electronic medical record data and analysed with run charts. Among adults aged &ge;65 years, vaccination rates increased modestly from 62.7% to 64.3%. Following expansion of vaccine eligibility to adults aged &ge;50 years, baseline vaccination rates decreased to 39.9% due to the enlarged eligible population; however, rates subsequently increased to 44.1% by the end of the intervention period, representing a 4.2% absolute improvement and meeting criteria for a sustained run chart shift. These findings demonstrate that small, multidisciplinary, workflow-integrated interventions can produce meaningful and sustainable improvements in adult pneumococcal vaccination uptake in residency clinic settings and may be adaptable to other resource-limited primary care environments.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bista, R., Alli, A., Ceniceros, A. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T06:47:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003878</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003878</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving pneumococcal vaccination uptake in a residency clinic: a case-inspired QI initiative aligned with updated CDC guidelines]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003878</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003878</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003940?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Empowering women, strengthening support: a quality improvement project to enhance pelvic floor health awareness]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003940?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is a prevalent yet under-recognised condition among obstetric women, often presenting as urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Despite evidence supporting pelvic floor muscle training as an effective first-line management strategy, awareness and service utilisation remain suboptimal. This quality improvement project, conducted at Singapore General Hospital, aimed to enhance PFD awareness among obstetric patients and nursing staff and to increase physiotherapy uptake from a baseline of 0% to 50% within 6 months.</p>
<p>The comprehensive root cause analysis identified three critical barriers to physiotherapy utilisation within our department&mdash;inadequate screening procedures, insufficient staff and patient education and poorly defined referral processes. A pre&ndash;post intervention design was implemented across outpatient, inpatient and postnatal care settings. Interventions included structured patient education through pamphlets, digital media and discharge materials, systematic PFD screening and strengthened referral pathways. Nursing staff received targeted training and physician engagement was integrated in later cycles to improve patient receptivity. Outcomes were assessed through referral rates, completed physiotherapy appointments and pre/post education surveys with nursing staff.</p>
<p>Baseline data revealed inconsistent referrals and low health literacy as key barriers. During the first cycle, many antenatal patients deferred physiotherapy until postpartum, highlighting the need for stronger physician involvement. Adjustments in the second cycle, particularly routine counselling by obstetrics doctors, improved patient acceptance and referral compliance. As a result, physiotherapy uptake increased significantly, reaching the target of 50% within 2 months. Nursing staff also demonstrated improved confidence and knowledge in PFD education.</p>
<p>This initiative successfully embedded pelvic floor health into standard maternal care, underscoring the importance of education, multidisciplinary collaboration and physician advocacy in overcoming stigma and systemic gaps. It also establishes a sustainable framework for integrating pelvic floor health into maternity care and improving long-term outcomes for women.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chun, R. P. C., Goh, W. L., Kyaw Isabella, K. M. N., Lim, J. S. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T06:47:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003940</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003940</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Empowering women, strengthening support: a quality improvement project to enhance pelvic floor health awareness]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003940</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003940</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003787?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Non-directed bronchoalveolar lavage: improving the quality and timing of pneumonia diagnosis in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003787?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Early respiratory sampling in mechanically ventilated patients with suspected community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is essential for guiding antimicrobial therapy, but endotracheal aspirate (ETA) is frequently contaminated with upper airway flora and bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is invasive. Non-directed BAL (ND-BAL) can be performed at the bedside without bronchoscopy and has comparable diagnostic accuracy to bronchoscopic BAL.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To implement ND-BAL as a bedside procedure for mechanically ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients admitted within 48 hours of hospital admission with suspected CAP, increasing the proportion receiving a respiratory sample within 6 hours of ICU admission from 38% to &ge;70% over 12 months and to compare oral flora contamination between ETA and ND-BAL.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A multidisciplinary team introduced a standardised ND-BAL protocol in a tertiary ICU. Baseline audit (January&ndash;December 2023) was compared with postimplementation data (March 2024&ndash;February 2025).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The proportion of eligible patients with a respiratory sample collected within 6 hours increased from 14/40 (35%) to 34/44 (77%). ND-BAL samples demonstrated lower oral flora contamination than ETA (50% vs 90.9%). Legionella culture testing increased from 15% to 56.8%, while empiric methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Legionella antimicrobial coverage remained similar. No ND-BAL-related adverse events were identified.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>ND-BAL was feasibly integrated as a joint nursing&ndash;medical bedside procedure and improved the timeliness and quality of respiratory sampling in mechanically ventilated patients with suspected CAP. This provides a platform for future rapid molecular diagnostics and antimicrobial stewardship.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lewis, G., Smith, C. D., Sundararajan, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T04:52:56-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003787</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003787</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Non-directed bronchoalveolar lavage: improving the quality and timing of pneumonia diagnosis in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003787</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003787</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003738?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Integration of specialised mental health services in an HIV clinic in a low resource setting]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003738?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Neuropsychiatric complications associated with HIV have been extensively studied, given the significant impact they have on the global disease burden. Despite an abundance of research focusing on HIV&rsquo;s influence on mental health, there remains a dearth of investigation into the integration of comprehensive mental health services and the exploration of a broader spectrum of mental health conditions within this population, especially for low-resource settings.</p>
<p>This programme aimed to integrate specialised mental health services through the introduction of routine screening, internal referral pathways, on-site psychiatric assessment, treatment and external referral pathways and determine the spectrum of mental health disorders among individuals with HIV at the Infectious Diseases Institute, Uganda.</p>
<p>The psychiatric health services were set up in collaboration with health experts from the institute who facilitated the screening and treatment protocols for mental illnesses in HIV care. Patients were screened for mental illnesses; those who screened positive were further assessed by a psychiatrist and treated and others were referred for further treatment as needed at Mulago National Referral Hospital. We conducted a chart review in 2016 of all cases that had registered since 2013. Statistical analysis was conducted using STATA V.13.0 to generate descriptive statistics.</p>
<p>A specialised mental health clinic was successfully incorporated into Infectious Disease Institute, Makerere. The protocols for screening, treatment, long-term management and follow-up were established. Among the 211 retrieved cases, there were more females (66.5%), and nearly a quarter of the individuals (22.4%) had a history of prior mental illness. Predominant diagnoses included depression (27%), adjustment disorder (16.1%) and HIV-related psychosis (10%).</p>
<p>Our findings underscore the viability of integrating specialised mental health services into routine HIV differentiated care through this model. Mental disorders, notably depression, were prevalent within this clinic. Based on these insights, we advocate for enhanced mental healthcare delivery for the HIV populations.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nakasujja, N., Aujo, B. T., Mayanja, F., Akimana, B., Castelnuovo, B., Lamorde, M., Parkes-Ratanshi, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T05:59:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003738</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003738</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Integration of specialised mental health services in an HIV clinic in a low resource setting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003738</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003738</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003903?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Applying Lean Six Sigma to improve efficiency in outpatient iodine-131 therapy: reducing process time and material waste]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003903?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>At our institution, outpatient radioactive iodine-131 (&sup1;<sup>3</sup>&sup1;I) therapy requires coordination across multiple teams and is prone to inefficiencies. Patients and staff experienced process delays on the day of dose administration due to extended treatment times, inconsistent workflows and material waste. This project aimed to reduce overall process time (OPT) by 25% within 12 months while maintaining radiation safety and minimising material costs associated with room wrapping, a separate process involving the protection of treatment room surfaces from radioactive contamination.</p>
<p>Workflow data were collected from 55 patients treated between January 2022 and June 2024 to establish a baseline. Quality improvement methods using the Lean Six Sigma (Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve, Control) framework were applied to identify inefficiencies and implement changes through two sequential improvement cycles focused on standardising processes governing patient arrival, predosing and discharge. Wrapping workflow interventions simplified material use and standardised the wrapping order.</p>
<p>After the first improvement cycle, average OPT decreased from 156.3 min to 114.2 min (26.9% reduction from baseline). The proportion of patients with an OPT under 2 hours increased from 9.1% to 61.9%. After the second improvement cycle, OPT further decreased to 103.0 min (34.1% reduction from baseline), and 73.3% of patients were discharged within 2 hours. Material costs per treatment decreased from $35.80 to $19.00 (46.9% reduction), with additional unquantified cost and time savings from procedure scheduling changes.</p>
<p>The sequential application of Lean Six Sigma strategies significantly reduced process time and material costs in outpatient &sup1;<sup>3</sup>&sup1;I therapy without compromising radiation safety standards. These interventions demonstrate how structured quality improvement can enhance staff efficiency and resource use, providing a replicable model for other complex clinical workflows.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jani, S., Murray, M., Kramer, D., Thawani, N., Diaz, A., Sorensen, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T05:59:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003903</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003903</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Applying Lean Six Sigma to improve efficiency in outpatient iodine-131 therapy: reducing process time and material waste]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003903</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003903</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e004013?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Complex intervention to improve empathy within maternity services: a mixed methods feasibility study with pilot evaluation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e004013?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Lack of empathy in National Health Service maternity services contributes to adverse outcomes for women, babies and practitioners. While empathy training can improve individual communication, sustainable improvement in empathy requires system-level change. We conducted a mixed-methods feasibility study with pilot implementation and evaluation of an initiative to improve system-level empathy within a maternity unit. The initiative was a complex intervention that included empathy training for practitioners, training in empathic teamwork and a system-level empathy workshop. The mixed-methods evaluation was conducted in two phases. Phase 1 included questionnaires assessing participant satisfaction and intention to change behaviour. Phase 2 included questionnaires assessing perceived change in empathy, staff satisfaction and patient satisfaction. System-level changes generated by healthcare leaders were also recorded. Quantitative data were summarised using descriptive statistics and free text comments were analysed using thematic analysis informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Of the 177 maternity services staff who took part, 123 completed the first evaluation phase. 89% of these rated their satisfaction with the workshops as 8 or higher and 86% rated the likelihood that the training would improve empathy as 8 or higher on 10-point scales. Thematic analysis of free-text comments generated four themes: (1) appreciation for intraprofessional and interprofessional interaction, (2) value of creating a supportive environment, (3) enhanced ability to identify practical approaches to empathy and (4) desire for additional workshops. Twenty-one participants completed the second evaluation phase. Most (76%) agreed that the work had led to greater empathy. System-level changes included the introduction of free coffee for staff, weekly &lsquo;gratitude pledges&rsquo; and a fortnightly community newsletter. This mixed-methods feasibility study demonstrated that implementation of the intervention is feasible and acceptable and generated pilot data to inform future evaluation. Early data suggest positive trends in empathy and patient satisfaction, supporting the need for sustained implementation and longitudinal evaluation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bennett-Weston, A., Ward, A., Burnett, D., Hogg, J., Knight, R., Howick, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T05:59:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-004013</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-004013</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Complex intervention to improve empathy within maternity services: a mixed methods feasibility study with pilot evaluation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e004013</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e004013</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003785?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Standardising written informed consent forms to improve patient care: a quality improvement project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003785?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Informed consent is a critical component of patient-centred care, yet variability in its delivery can undermine patient understanding, satisfaction and autonomy. In practice, however, the process is often hindered by high clinical workloads, time pressures and the absence of a standardised approach, which can lead to incomplete explanations, variability in practice and reduced patient comprehension. This project aimed to improve patient understanding and satisfaction with bedside procedures by introducing a standardised informed consent process.</p>
<p>This study was conducted at Hamad General Hospital&rsquo;s Acute Medical Assessment Unit to enhance the informed consent process for routine medical procedures, including thoracocentesis, paracentesis, lumbar puncture and blood transfusions. Prefilled consent forms were developed for each bedside procedure, detailing both common and uncommon complications with estimated prevalence. Multilingual patient information templates and pictorial aids were produced to address the needs of patients from diverse language and literacy backgrounds. The intervention was implemented over 10 sequential Plan&ndash;Do&ndash;Study&ndash;Act cycles, each lasting 4 weeks, targeting barriers such as workflow integration, accessibility of forms and staff engagement.</p>
<p>Patient satisfaction with the informed consent process increased from 64% to 94% over the course of the project. Patients reported improved understanding of procedure risks, benefits and alternatives and nursing staff described greater confidence and proactive participation in the process.</p>
<p>This outcome supports a structured, standardised consent process supported by multilingual written materials and visual aids, which can substantially improve patient understanding and satisfaction for bedside procedures. Embedding these tools into routine workflows, supported by multidisciplinary engagement, can deliver more equitable and consistent patient-centred care.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akram, J., Jasim, N., Al Hattab, F., Khalid, M., Jebril, R. A., Alsheikh, I. S., Bougaila, A., Elamin, N. H., Subhash, E., Tawengi, M. M., Zahid, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:23:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003785</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003785</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Standardising written informed consent forms to improve patient care: a quality improvement project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003785</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003785</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003626?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Study on the effectiveness and accessibility of a CDR-based VTE quality control platform in county-level hospitals]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003626?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>To enhance venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention and management in county-level hospitals, we developed a VTE quality control platform leveraging clinical databases and Clinician Workstations. The platform is characterised by simplified construction, cost-effectiveness and a user-friendly interface enabling precise real-time monitoring of VTE prevention measures in hospitalised patients. Comparative analysis of pre-implementation and post implementation data revealed significant improvements in key metrics: VTE bleeding risk assessment rate (1.33% vs 7.43%, p&lt;0.001), basic prevention compliance (20.87% vs 50.38%, p&lt;0.001), mechanical prevention utilisation (24.60% vs 27.37%, p=0.002) and appropriate prevention rate (11.67% vs 53.11%, p&lt;0.001). The platform effectively optimised VTE prevention practices, demonstrating ease of deployment, affordability and operational efficiency&mdash;making it a scalable and practical solution for county-level hospitals in China.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zang, Z., Liu, b. s., Li, J., Li, L., Li, Z., Liu, J., Zhang, J., Bian, W., Yuan, C., Wang, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-08T05:41:26-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003626</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003626</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Study on the effectiveness and accessibility of a CDR-based VTE quality control platform in county-level hospitals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003626</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003626</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003740?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Closed loop full process management and application of body fluid specimens in hospitalised patients]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003740?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To develop and implement a closed-loop full-process management system for body fluid specimens in hospitalised patients, with the aim of improving submission timeliness and specimen quality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A multidisciplinary inpatient specimen management team was established to analyse the causes of inefficiencies in the collection-to-submission process of body fluid specimens. Based on these findings, targeted interventions were formulated and implemented in February 2025. The preanalytical turnaround times and unqualified specimen rate before and after implementation were compared.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>After implementing the closed-loop management system, the delayed submission rate of body fluid specimens decreased from 15.62% to 5.8% and the unqualified specimen rate decreased from 0.70% to 0.39%. The improvement in submission timeliness and specimen quality was statistically significant (p&lt;0.05). All indicators showed significant differences at 3 and 6 months after intervention compared with before intervention (p&lt;0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The implementation of a closed-loop full-process management system for body fluid specimens effectively improved the timeliness of specimen submission, reduced delays and decreased the occurrence of unqualified specimens, thereby enhancing patient safety.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhao, D., Peng, Y., Wang, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-08T05:41:26-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003740</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003740</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Closed loop full process management and application of body fluid specimens in hospitalised patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003740</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003740</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003893?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Performance and challenges of success in quality improvement projects of selected public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A MUSIQ analysis of a perinatal quality improvement collaborative in Ethiopian public hospitals]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003893?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) are a common strategy to improve healthcare in low-resource settings. However, their success is highly variable. The Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ) posits that contextual factors at multiple levels determine outcomes. We used MUSIQ to investigate why a well-supported perinatal QIC in Ethiopia had mixed results, testing the hypothesis that internal organisational factors rather than external support would be the primary differentiator of success.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study was conducted with all quality improvement (QI) team members across six public hospitals in Addis Ababa participating in a perinatal QIC. Contextual factors were assessed using the validated MUSIQ tool. The primary outcome was binary QI success (met/not met a predefined target for reducing perinatal mortality/morbidity). MUSIQ scores were compared between successful and non-successful hospitals using Mann-Whitney U tests. A multivariable logistic regression model was built to identify factors independently associated with success.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Sixty-seven QI team members participated (95.7% response rate). The overall mean MUSIQ score was 121.2&plusmn;15.6, indicating a &lsquo;reasonable chance of success&rsquo;. However, scores were significantly higher in successful hospitals (median 129.9 vs 118.8, p=0.002). While external support scores were uniformly high, successful hospitals demonstrated significantly stronger scores in the organisation (p=0.045) and QI team (p=0.005) domains. Regression analysis confirmed that factors within the QI team (leadership, physician involvement) and organisation (senior leadership engagement) domains were independently associated with success, after accounting for other variables.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The success of this QIC was predominantly determined by internal organisational and team factors, not by the strong external support common to many global health initiatives. This highlights a critical implementation gap: top-down QICs often fail to catalyse the necessary internal leadership and team dynamics for success. Future initiatives must invest in building internal organisational context alongside providing external technical support.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bekele, B. T., Workneh, W. M., Simeneh, G. T., Wotango, B. Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T07:08:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003893</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003893</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Performance and challenges of success in quality improvement projects of selected public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A MUSIQ analysis of a perinatal quality improvement collaborative in Ethiopian public hospitals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003893</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003893</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003919?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Participatory system dynamics in implementation science practice: a scoping review of methods, contexts and outcomes]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003919?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>This scoping review documents participatory system dynamics (PSD) applications in implementation science (IS) studies following a recent, increased integration of the two fields in the USA. It aims to illustrate &lsquo;how&rsquo; and &lsquo;why&rsquo; PSD modelling improves understanding of determinants of implementation outcomes for quality improvement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We queried PubMed and PsycInfo for PSD, IS and their synonyms (community-based system dynamics or group model building, dissemination, quality improvement, translational research or knowledge translation). USA-based empirical studies were included when they described synchronous participatory activities to define a modelling problem over time. Studies were included when PSD was used as an implementation research method or implementation practice strategy. Fifty-eight studies on concept mapping were excluded, as were 65 intervention mapping studies. Nine articles remained after full-text review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Most studies (n=7) investigated PSD itself as the intervention for understanding an implementation problem or use it as a tool to understand how to implement an evidence-based practice (n=4) or select an IS strategy (n=3). Most articles were case studies, investigating feasibility and knowledge translation during the preparation phase.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We recommend that implementation research and practice clarify whether PSD is used as a method to uncover contextual determinants or strategy to do so. PSD has strong potential to use enhanced participant buy-in and problem definition to understand &lsquo;how&rsquo; implementation strategies account for cyclical and temporal determinants. Greater alignment between PSD activities, participatory theory, implementation phases and outcomes is needed to strengthen evaluation of PSD&rsquo;s applications in IS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration</st>
<p>The protocol for this paper is listed in the UNC Libraries repository (<A HREF="https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/concern/scholarly_works/6682xg09r">https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/concern/scholarly_works/6682xg09r</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caton, L., Zimmerman, L., Kahkoska, A., Goldstein, B. A., Sperber, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T07:08:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003919</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003919</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Participatory system dynamics in implementation science practice: a scoping review of methods, contexts and outcomes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003919</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003919</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003977?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving patient well-being in subacute care: a quality improvement initiative]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003977?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Individuals experience lower levels of well-being when admitted to hospital. Maximising well-being may lead to improved outcomes for patients and the health service. We aimed to (1) implement co-designed strategies to improve patient well-being on subacute wards, (2) evaluate the well-being levels of the patient cohort before and after implementation and (3) identify barriers and enablers to implementation of strategies. We conducted a quality improvement study with pre&ndash;post evaluation across six subacute wards in a tertiary hospital. Data from interviews with patients and meetings between ward staff and management enabled the co-design of strategies to enhance patient well-being. Strategies were prioritised and implemented using plan, do, study, act cycles. Well-being levels were assessed in the cohort using a scale before (n=153) and after (n=145) implementation. A total of 17 strategies to optimise patient well-being were generated; each ward prioritised implementing key strategies relevant to their setting. While intentions to implement the strategies were high, implementation fidelity of strategies varied due to several barriers identified by staff. Well-being levels reported by patients after implementation were not significantly different from those reported by patients before. Despite extensive consultation and co-design of strategies with patients and staff, well-being levels were not improved at the conclusion of the improvement project. Confounders (such as high hospital demand at the follow-up evaluation time) may have impacted results. Suboptimal implementation fidelity may have also reduced the impact of the initiative.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bierer, P., Brown, M., Chapman, M., Laver, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T07:08:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003977</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003977</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving patient well-being in subacute care: a quality improvement initiative]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003977</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003977</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e004026?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessing stakeholder readiness for implementation of a diabetes prevention programme for patients with recent gestational diabetes: a short report]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e004026?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Implementing guideline-based diabetes prevention programs (DPPs) for women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is critical, given the global rise in type 2 diabetes (T2D) and the established association between GDM and subsequent diabetes risk. Implementing new healthcare programs, however, is inherently challenging, as success depends on the engagement and commitment of frontline providers. Determining stakeholders' readiness for change was therefore critical before implementing a postpartum DPP for patients with recent GDM.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>We conducted a cross-sectional survey of healthcare providers across three DPP implementation settings in Ontario, Canada. Survey measures included the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) scale and a measure assessing constructs from the inner setting domain of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Due to our low sample size, we analyzed results descriptively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We surveyed 36 stakeholders across three implementation settings. The ORIC scale and CFIR-based measurement tool scores were relatively high (greater than 4.00 out of 5.00) across most participants. Scores were similar across service types and professional roles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Stakeholders across three settings appear ready to implement a postpartum DPP for patients with GDM. Although those from an integrated care setting tended toward higher readiness based on change efficacy and commitment, the results of the CFIR-based measurement tool underscore the importance of using tailored approaches when implementing programs in community-based settings with lower resources.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sushko, K., Sriskandarajah, A., Ali, S., Racey, M., Rahman, I., Sahye-Pudaruth, S., Sherifali, D., Smith, K., Zehra, A., Lipscombe, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T07:08:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-004026</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-004026</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessing stakeholder readiness for implementation of a diabetes prevention programme for patients with recent gestational diabetes: a short report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e004026</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e004026</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003806?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Addressing low-value care (LVC) in Asia: a narrative review of Choosing Wisely and other initiatives across Asia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003806?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Low-value care (LVC) research originates predominantly from Western healthcare systems. This narrative review offers the first synthesis of LVC patterns, determinants and reduction initiatives across six diverse Asian countries (Japan, Singapore, South Korea, China, Malaysia and India), comparing them with Western models to inform context-specific de-implementation strategies and identify key priorities for further research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This is a narrative review of 132 English and non-English literature (2000&ndash;2025) from academic databases, grey literature, and policy documents across the six countries that was analysed using a novel framework examining LVC landscapes (healthcare challenges and measurement), determinants (structural, organisational, clinician, patient) and reduction initiatives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Asian systems mirror Western pressures from demographic shifts, escalating costs and a growing burden of non-communicable diseases, underscoring the urgency of reducing LVC. Despite this, systematic measurement of LVC in Asia remains limited. Common LVC determinants include fee-for-service incentives, medicolegal concerns and a &lsquo;more is better&rsquo; cultural perception, though further research, particularly on cross-country comparisons and from the patient&rsquo;s perspective, is needed. LVC reduction initiatives are still emerging in Asia, with existing approaches shaped by local cultural norms and resource constraints, suggesting that Western strategies provide valuable insights but require adaptation for successful local de-implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This multicountry review establishes a foundation for further collaborative LVC research in Asia via a holistic framework linking country-specific contexts to tailor de-implementation strategies. Key priorities for LVC research in Asia include systematic LVC quantification, development of contextualised evidence-based recommendations and implementation of contextualised multicomponent interventions, supported by further research and regional collaboration.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yeo, J. X., Tokuda, Y., Sasaki, S., Pan, J., Kamaruzaman, H., Ranganathan, P., Lu, L., Mohamad Yusof, A., Izaham, A., Pramesh, C. S., Abdullah, H. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T06:34:57-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003806</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003806</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Addressing low-value care (LVC) in Asia: a narrative review of Choosing Wisely and other initiatives across Asia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003806</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003806</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003956?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Closing the loop on tourniquet safety in distal radius fracture fixation surgery: a two-cycle quality improvement project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003956?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The application of intraoperative tourniquets is a fundamental component of distal radius fracture surgery, yet it carries a risk of significant complications. The British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) has published safety guidelines (BOA Standards for Trauma (BOAST)) to standardise practice, but adherence is often suboptimal. This quality improvement project aimed to evaluate and improve compliance with these guidelines in a real-world clinical setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A two-cycle retrospective audit was conducted at a major trauma centre in the UK. The first cycle (January to April 2023, n=34) established baseline compliance with seven key BOAST documentation standards. Following this, a multifaceted intervention was implemented, including staff education, the introduction of a standardised checklist and the placement of visual reminders in operating theatres. A re-audit was then conducted (May to June 2024, n=63) to measure the impact of these interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Baseline documentation compliance was extremely low, with only tourniquet pressure recorded in 20.5% (7/34) and tourniquet time documented in 55.9% (19/34). Following the interventions, documentation of tourniquet pressure increased to 59.0% (37/63) and tourniquet site, padding, compressive exsanguination, skin condition, tourniquet size and tourniquet time showed modest improvements. Overall compliance, however, remained below optimal levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A targeted quality improvement initiative combining education and practical tools can lead to meaningful improvements in adherence to tourniquet safety guidelines. Despite these gains, persistent documentation gaps highlight the need for more robust, system-level solutions, such as integration into electronic health records, to ensure sustained compliance and enhance patient safety.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mersal, M., Sarofeen, S., Embaby, O., Shammout, S., OSullivan, C., Lawrence, C., Giri, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T06:34:57-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003956</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003956</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Closing the loop on tourniquet safety in distal radius fracture fixation surgery: a two-cycle quality improvement project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003956</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003956</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003981?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lean management enhances antimicrobial stewardship in a Chinese psychiatric hospital: a quality improvement study on aetiological submission rates]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003981?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Antimicrobial resistance poses a significant threat to global health, exacerbated by the misuse of antibiotics. The aetiology examinations are crucial for rational antibiotic use but often inadequate in clinical practices. This study aimed to improve the aetiological submission rate before therapeutic antibiotic use (aetiological submission; AS rate) in a provincial psychiatric hospital in China using lean management to improve antimicrobial stewardship.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A quality improvement initiative was conducted from June 2021 to April 2022 by employing the Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control (DMAIC) lean model. The effectiveness of the intervention was evaluated by comparing the aetiological submission status of 885 hospitalised patients receiving therapeutic antibiotics during the baseline period (June to October 2021) with that of 904 inpatients during the postintervention period (November 2021 to April 2022) and by evaluating whether there was a significant difference in the AS rates within the five targeting departments before and after the intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The hospital-wide AS rate significantly increased from 12.43% (110/885) at baseline to 84.96% (768/904) after intervention (&sup2;=941.24, p&lt;0.001), exceeding the target of 50%. Significant improvements (all p&lt;0.001) were also observed in all targeting departments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The application of lean management, specifically the DMAIC lean model, proved highly effective in enhancing the AS rate. This systematic approach provides an improvement model for antimicrobial stewardship and offers valuable experience and reference for other healthcare institutions in their antimicrobial stewardship practices.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, L., Wu, N., Zheng, J., Meng, Y., Ning, K., Wang, J., Ren, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T06:34:57-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003981</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003981</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lean management enhances antimicrobial stewardship in a Chinese psychiatric hospital: a quality improvement study on aetiological submission rates]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003981</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003981</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e004084?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Towards resilient and agile health systems: lessons from abrupt donor withdrawal in Jordan]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e004084?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Donor-funded health programmes strengthen national quality systems in low-income and middle-income countries, but abrupt withdrawal of external support can create institutional gaps and threaten service sustainability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To analyse the impact of sudden donor funding cessation, using the experience of the Health Care Accreditation Council (HCAC) as an illustrative case, and to explore implications for quality infrastructure and health system resilience.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This structured case-based policy analysis draws on institutional documentation, administrative records and publicly available reports to examine the effects of funding withdrawal on quality programmes and organisational capacity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Funding cessation led to contraction of technical workforce capacity, scaling back of quality improvement and professional development activities, and disruption of accreditation-related support. The case exposed vulnerabilities associated with donor dependency and insufficient transition planning.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Abrupt donor withdrawal can weaken quality systems and patient safety gains. Strengthening resilience requires diversified financing, structured transition frameworks and institutional strategies that embed quality governance within nationally owned systems.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaouni, S., Lachman, P., Hassan, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T05:04:04-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-004084</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-004084</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Towards resilient and agile health systems: lessons from abrupt donor withdrawal in Jordan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e004084</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e004084</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003805?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Collecting Accurate and Robust Equity (CARE) data: an analysis of a pilot quality improvement initiative in ambulatory settings]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003805?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Social determinants of health (SDoH) influence disease incidence, access to care, experiences, and outcomes. Recognising their importance, researchers and governments have emphasised the need to collect SDoH data in healthcare settings. However, gaps remain in understanding how to collect this information respectfully and equitably. To address these gaps, we aimed to understand local community perspectives on patient-centred SDoH data collection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>We held a community engagement session to gather input from equity-denied communities on SDoH questions, response options, preferred methods of answering and appropriate data use. Qualitative data were analysed using content analysis, guided by the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model. We also collected patient feedback from the first six months of implementing patient-centred SDoH data collection in ambulatory services at a large academic health science centre. This feedback was collected through an anonymous Microsoft Forms survey on comfort, safety and ease of responding to the SDoH questions and was summarised using medians and frequencies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The community engagement session included 22 participants, including eight patient advisors from diverse community organisations. Participants identified COM-B-related barriers to completing the questionnaire, such as unclear terminology, privacy concerns and mistrust of data use. Facilitators included inclusive language, multiple response methods, and transparency, particularly around data use. After integrating this feedback, the early implementation demonstrated high levels of comfort and safety. Additional feedback from the implementation highlighted opportunities to expand response methods, enhance staff engagement and education and establish ongoing partnerships with patients and communities to support the equitable use of SDoH data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Collecting SDoH data in healthcare settings is essential for facilitating equity-informed quality improvement, research, and decision-making. Our project highlights opportunities to overcome barriers by expanding response methods, enhancing staff engagement and education and fostering ongoing partnerships with patients and communities to support equitable SDoH data use and reporting.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheikh, F., Dang Nguyen, M., Babrah, K., Begum, N., Azzam Iqbal, N., Mbuagbaw, L., Walker, J., Reid, R., Fox-Robichaud, A., Schwartz, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-27T04:18:08-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003805</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003805</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Collecting Accurate and Robust Equity (CARE) data: an analysis of a pilot quality improvement initiative in ambulatory settings]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003805</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003805</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003909?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mixed-methods evaluation of the implementation of IOTA-ADNEX ultrasound triage in NHS secondary care ovarian diagnostic one-stop clinics]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003909?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Robust evidence supports International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA)-Assessment of Different Neoplasias in the Adnexa (ADNEX) ultrasound triage at 10% threshold for ovarian cancer (OC) diagnosis to identify women for referral to tertiary gynaecological cancer centres for further management. The IOTA-ADNEX risk prediction model has superior sensitivity compared with the current standard of care triage, Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI-1), yet NHS adoption is limited. In our survey of British Gynaecological Cancer Society clinicians, only 30% (24/79) currently follow an IOTA model, despite 80% (63/79) supporting implementation. We evaluated IOTA-ADNEX implementation within two NHS one-stop clinics (OSC) for suspected OC, examining clinical outcomes alongside implementation barriers and facilitators.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Mixed-methods study conducted across two UK NHS hospitals between June 2023 and June 2025. Implementation outcomes were surgical intervention rates comparing IOTA-ADNEX-guided and retrospectively calculated RMI-based management using National Institute for Health and Care Excellence/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists thresholds and patient process metrics. 11 qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with NHS staff involved in OSC implementation and thematic analysis performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 334 patients, 42% (139) underwent same-day discharge. Using IOTA-ADNEX at a 10% threshold, 10% (32/334) of patients underwent surgery under the general gynaecology and cancer unit team. In comparison, 30% (94/334) would have undergone surgery under the same teams if RMI-based triage had been used. Five themes identified from qualitative analysis: organisational infrastructure, clinical decision-making, communication and pathway definition, professional collaboration and training support, and patient experience. Key facilitators included dedicated clinical leadership, timely decision-making capabilities and quality assurance sessions. Barriers included lack of standardised post-clinic pathways and insufficient staff communication about pathway changes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>IOTA-ADNEX implementation in OSC offers high same-day discharge rates and reduction in surgical rates compared with RMI triage. To ensure success, implementation should be supported by adequate infrastructure, training and clear pathways. It requires leadership, comprehensive staff training and robust communication strategies. These findings provide practical guidance for healthcare systems for wider implementation of IOTA-ADNEX.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Do, V., Crisp, H., Cummins, C., Kannangara, S., Smotra, G., Tarbuck, B., Duke, O., Salar, A., Jhita, N., Sai, V., Rati, N., Sundar, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-20T06:21:08-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003909</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003909</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mixed-methods evaluation of the implementation of IOTA-ADNEX ultrasound triage in NHS secondary care ovarian diagnostic one-stop clinics]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003909</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003909</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003967?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Optimising multidisciplinary team care in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease: a healthcare improvement initiative from a dedicated referral centre]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003967?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Paediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) requires complex, multidisciplinary care. However, variation in service delivery and limited insight into patient and family experience may impact care quality. This study evaluated patient-reported experience in a specialist paediatric IBD multidisciplinary team (MDT) clinic, benchmarked findings against an internal target and informed local quality improvement.</p>
<p>All patients and accompanying family members attending the MDT clinic at Sheffield Children&rsquo;s Hospital between November 2023 and May 2024 (n=242 attendances) were invited to complete a 15-item feedback questionnaire covering access, consultation quality, communication, self-management confidence, psychosocial support and environmental factors. Responses were coded numerically (&ndash;2 to +2), summed and normalised to a percentage scale. Quality improvement methodology was applied to analyse results against a Trust-defined benchmark of 82.5% and identify SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) improvement targets.</p>
<p>49 questionnaires were returned (20.2% response rate). High satisfaction was reported for consultation time and clinician responsiveness (100%), staff professionalism (94%) and clarity of management instructions (90%). Domains falling below benchmark included appointment scheduling (77.6%), waiting times (81.6%), communication with primary care (78.6%), self-management confidence (80.6%) and transition planning (66%). Based on the baseline results, we subsequently implemented SMART-based interventions, including nurse-led triage, pharmacist-led medication reviews and structured transition pathways. Early feedback suggested improved coordination and reduced waiting times.</p>
<p>Families value MDT outpatient care in paediatric IBD, particularly in-clinic interactions and clarity of care. Persistent gaps in access, primary care coordination and transition planning highlight opportunities for targeted improvement. Integrating patient-reported experience with structured quality-improvement frameworks provides a pragmatic approach to enhancing service delivery and benchmarking outcomes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dipasquale, V., DelNero, N., Liddiard, G., Hinchliffe, C., Hubbard, R., Londt, Z., Narula, P., Kapoor, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:18:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003967</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003967</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Optimising multidisciplinary team care in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease: a healthcare improvement initiative from a dedicated referral centre]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003967</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003967</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003585?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Optimising the emergency-readiness of public access defibrillators across Wales using quality improvement methodology]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003585?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Early bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) have been shown to significantly improve survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Public access to AEDs, also known as public access defibrillators (PADs), is hence a critical component for successful emergency bystander intervention.</p>
<p>Wales currently has over 8000 PADs registered on a UK-wide defibrillator network&mdash;&lsquo;The Circuit&rsquo; supported by the British Heart Foundation. This enables emergency services to direct people to the nearest emergency-ready PAD when an OHCA occurs. However, not all PADs are on The Circuit as registration is not mandated, and maintaining PAD fleets in emergency-ready status represents a substantial challenge. Limited research exists regarding the veracity of operational status of PADs in real-world settings, or initiatives which increase numbers of available emergency-ready PADs.</p>
<p>This national quality improvement (QI) project assessed the introduction, spread and scale across Wales of an innovative role, Community Coordinators, funded by Welsh Government through the Save a Life Cymru programme. The project aimed to increase the emergency-ready status of the Welsh PAD fleet by 5% from a baseline of 89% by June 2024. Data from The Circuit supported establishment of baseline measures and ongoing data analytics during the study period (August 2022&ndash;July 2024).</p>
<p>The introduction of Community Coordinators increased the proportion of Wales&rsquo; emergency-ready PADs from 0.89 to 0.94. Process measures indicated firstly, an increase in registered PADs in Wales from 6415 to 8638. Secondly, the proportion of PADs registered with a PAD Guardian on The Circuit increased from 0.73 to 0.89.</p>
<p>This QI project demonstrated that the problem of PAD non-readiness is complex, multifactorial and dynamic. Networked Community Coordinators to support volunteer PAD Guardians increased the emergency-ready status of the all-Wales defibrillator fleet. This innovative Welsh model could benefit wider UK and international communities.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goodfellow, S., Hardyman, W., Sullivan, J., Starling, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-10T09:14:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003585</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003585</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Optimising the emergency-readiness of public access defibrillators across Wales using quality improvement methodology]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003585</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003585</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003963?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Feasibility and early outcomes of a multi-site TeleHospitalist admissions programme: staff and patient perspectives from a large health system]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003963?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Staffing shortages contribute to admission delays, fragmented care and hospitalist burnout. Although telemedicine has been widely adopted in critical care and subspecialties, its use in general inpatient admissions remains understudied. This study evaluated the feasibility, operational performance and early perceptions of a TeleHospitalist admissions programme designed to address nocturnal staffing shortages in a large academic health system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In October 2024, Houston Methodist launched a nocturnal TeleHospitalist programme. The programme provided centralised coverage via audio-video technology, operating from 18:00 to 02:00 initially and expanding to 18:00&ndash;06:00. Adult patients admitted from the emergency department (ED) between October 2024 and August 2025 and clinical staff involved in admission workflows, were surveyed. Operational data on admission timeliness were extracted from the Epic electronic medical record, and patient and staff experiences were evaluated through structured surveys and qualitative feedback.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Over 10 months, 1575 TeleHospitalist encounters were completed (median age 65 years (IQR 49 to 75); 56% were &ge;65 years). Median hospital length of stay was 38.5 hours (IQR 17.3 to 66.3), and median ED arrival-to-admission time was 7.3 hours (IQR 4.7 to 12.8). Among 311 patient respondents (19.7%; median age 66.5 years (IQR 52.3 to 75.6); 5% were &ge;65 years), satisfaction scores were high (median 4 (IQR 3 to 5). Staff responses (n=29) demonstrated strong endorsement: 86% favoured continuation, 79% reported comfort with the technology and 75% rated admission processes as better than traditional workflows.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A system-wide TeleHospitalist admissions programme was feasible and well accepted by patients and staff. Older adults reported positive experiences, suggesting age is not a barrier to virtual inpatient care. Early findings indicate improved timeliness, communication and workflow efficiency while mitigating overnight staffing gaps. Future studies will evaluate long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness and strategies to enhance privacy and patient engagement.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nguyen, N.-A., Sossong, S., Ishaq, F., Ellison, H., Lee, G., Randle, L., Gomez, M., Machnik, J., Pletcher, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-06T05:53:49-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003963</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003963</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Feasibility and early outcomes of a multi-site TeleHospitalist admissions programme: staff and patient perspectives from a large health system]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003963</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003963</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003765?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Overview of Perinatal Quality Collaboratives and their activities to advance perinatal healthcare in the USA, 2022-2023]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003765?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Perinatal Quality Collaboratives (PQCs) are state multidisciplinary teams working to improve maternal and infant healthcare by implementing quality improvement (QI) initiatives and other activities (initiatives/activities). This study aimed to improve understanding of the scope of PQCs and their work across the USA from 2022 to 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The National Network of PQCs conducted an online assessment of PQCs representing all 50 US states and the District of Columbia during May&ndash;July 2023. While the assessment included some historical questions, most questions asked PQCs to report on work conducted from 1 April 2022 to 31 March 2023. Descriptive statistics of assessment data&mdash;including PQC characteristics, participation, community partner engagement, QI initiatives, and activities&mdash;were calculated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The 45 responding PQCs were primarily housed in departments of health (35.6%), academic institutions (33.3%), or non-profit organisations (22.2%). Sixty-two percent of PQCs were established within the past 10 years (2014&ndash;2023). On average, 72.6% of birthing hospitals in each state participated in their PQC. Among the 26 PQCs with neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) participation, an average of 77.1% of NICUs in the state participated in their PQC. Thirty-two PQCs (71.1%) engaged with &ge;1 patient/family member, and 30 PQCs (66.7%) engaged with &ge;1 community-based organisation. PQCs reported on 195 initiatives/activities that they worked on during the reporting period. Twenty-six PQCs (57.8%) were working on 3&ndash;5 initiatives/activities. Most initiatives/activities were maternal-focused (n=105, 54.4%), followed by mother&ndash;infant&ndash;dyad-focused (n=53, 27.5%), and neonatal-focused (n=30, 15.5%). The most frequent initiative/activity topics were hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; substance use disorders among pregnant women; respectful care and non-medical factors that impact health; neonatal abstinence syndrome; and mental health among pregnant/postpartum women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>These findings illustrate the breadth of PQC work and how PQCs could contribute to national efforts to improve perinatal care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Menon, M., Yellman, M. A., Murakami, R., Penny, S. C., Zuckoff, I., Rowland, C., Wallace, J., Riehle-Colarusso, T., Berns, S. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-03T06:59:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003765</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003765</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Overview of Perinatal Quality Collaboratives and their activities to advance perinatal healthcare in the USA, 2022-2023]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003765</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003765</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003693?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Increase days between maternal death at Dessie Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Amhara region, Ethiopia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003693?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Maternal mortality is an area of particular concern in public health, especially in Africa, maternal deaths are the highest in the world. Globally, 287 000 women died during and following pregnancy and childbirth, almost 95% of all maternal deaths occurred in low and lower middle-income countries. Ethiopia is one of the countries struggling to reduce high maternal mortality from 412 deaths per 100 000 live births to 70 deaths per 100 000 live births. Ethiopia has implemented various initiatives to handle delays related to maternal death and availing free transport and maternity service. Despite all this effort, however, the number of maternal deaths remains unacceptably high. However, none of the quality improvement (QI) projects tested and implemented to reduce maternal mortality at facility level. In response to this gap, this QI project is aimed at increasing days between maternal death at Dessie Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Amhara region, Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Model for Improvement method was applied. As a baseline, we collected 1 year maternal mortality data, 6 months of chart review to assess the quality of care and 1 year&rsquo;s data collected during implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Result</st>
<p>The T-chart shows the average days between maternal deaths at Dessie Comprehensive Specialized Hospital increased from 14 days to 39 days. When we compared the absolute numbers, there were 21 maternal deaths within 1 year after implementing the interventions, which was only nine maternal deaths compared with the same period in the previous year. When we calculated the maternal mortality ratio, we reduced it from 327 per 100 000 live births to 162 per 100 000 live births.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The project involved three successful interventions: conducting consultations within 20 min, using the E-MOTIVE bundle checklist and implementing the pre-eclampsia/eclampsia bundle checklist. Additionally, through our Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, we learnt that a short consultation process, having one intensive care unit bed ready for mothers, ensuring the availability of essential medicines like tranexamic acid, using bundles, maintaining strong communication, engaging senior management in QI activities and holding frequent meetings of the QI committee were all helpful in improving our QI project.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alene, A. A., Zegeye, D. T., Kefale, A. B., Bogale, A. S., Mohamed, E., Asfaw, A. M., Eshete, H. A., Amare, A. A., Alemu, H., Meshesha, A. D., Mengstie, T. G., Abebe, A. G., Ali, A., Fentaw, H., Kiflie, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-02T07:52:01-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003693</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003693</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Increase days between maternal death at Dessie Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Amhara region, Ethiopia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003693</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003693</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003720?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quantitative resource utilisation of patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) at a community hospital emergency department (ED) observational controlled study (LEP-ED2 study)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/2/e003720?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) face communication barriers that can impact clinical assessment, prolong triage and affect diagnostic decision-making. Our Canadian community teaching hospital serves a linguistically diverse population and sought to understand the operational impact of LEP on emergency department (ED) workflow and resource use.</p>
<p>We conducted a prospective observational controlled study (LEPED2) involving adult patients presenting to the ED with chest pain. 31 patients with LEP, identified as needing professional interpreter services, were compared with 43 patients with non-LEP. All patients with LEP received interpretation via a virtual video device. The primary outcome was triage time. Secondary outcomes included the utilisation of CT scans and hospital admission rates. Statistical analyses included one-tailed t-tests and <sup>2</sup> tests.</p>
<p>Patients with LEP required significantly more time for triage (mean 7.76 min) than patients with non-LEP (5.41 min), representing a 43% increase (p=0.0003). Although differences in CT utilisation and admission rates were not statistically significant, a trend towards increased diagnostic testing among patients with LEP was observed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kwok, M. M. K., Thandi, R., Manku, A. S., Zhu, R., Castillo, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-02T07:52:01-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003720</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003720</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quantitative resource utilisation of patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) at a community hospital emergency department (ED) observational controlled study (LEP-ED2 study)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003720</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003720</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003887?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of national competence areas and competence goals for patient safety using a modified Delphi method]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003887?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The WHO calls for integrating patient safety curricula in healthcare education globally, but the limited contextual applicability of existing frameworks constrains national implementation. This work aims to describe the development of Swedish national competence goals in patient safety to establish patient safety as a distinct field summarised within a comprehensive framework of competency areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>The national competence goals were developed in a project initiated by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare that commissioned a group of academics with expertise in patient safety to work on the project. The development entailed an iterative process involving both physical and digital meetings, individual work and two rounds of questionnaires. Initially, drawing on expert knowledge and international literature, a set of competence areas based on key concepts in patient safety was proposed and defined. Within each competence area, several competence goals were developed. A modified Delphi process was then employed to collect insights from two multidisciplinary panels of experts (n=23). Finally, competence areas, key concepts and competence goals were refined based on feedback from the two Delphi panels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The project resulted in a national framework comprising 15 competence areas and 113 competence goals, highlighting key dimensions of patient safety such as foundational concepts, professional roles, systems thinking, patient involvement, human factors, communication and teamwork, organisational culture, risk awareness, learning from adverse events, evaluation, safe practices, technology, leadership, emergency preparedness and high-risk care situations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The development of national competence areas and goals marks an advancement in establishing patient safety as a distinct scientific discipline, where they collectively provide a broad and structured set of educational goals and standards. This initiative provides a foundation for integrating patient safety curricula into national healthcare education and strengthening patient safety practices, which can serve as an inspiration to others.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Unbeck, M., Dahlgren, A., Danielsson, C., Pukk Harenstam, K., Walfridsson, H., Ekstedt, M., Ros, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-31T09:08:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003887</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003887</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of national competence areas and competence goals for patient safety using a modified Delphi method]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003887</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003887</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003910?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving ward round documentation using the Heidi Health application]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003910?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Accurate and timely documentation during surgical ward rounds is critical for ensuring patient safety, effective multidisciplinary communication and continuity of care. In high-demand surgical settings, resident doctors often experience delays in completing documentation due to competing clinical priorities. This quality improvement project aimed to assess whether an artificial intelligence (AI) transcription tool, <I>Heidi</I>, could reduce documentation time in a busy ear, nose and throat (ENT) department within a tertiary centre.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Baseline data on time taken to complete conventional ward round documentation were collected over a 4-day period. The <I>Heidi</I> AI tool was then implemented to transcribe real-time discussions during ward rounds and automatically format the information using a structured template adapted from the SHINE Surgical Ward Round Toolkit. Documentation times using the AI system were recorded over a subsequent 4-day period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The implementation of <I>Heidi</I> led to a statistically significant reduction in documentation time compared with conventional methods.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Using AI tools can not only improve timeliness of clinical records but also free resident doctors from scribing duties, allowing greater participation in patient care and enhancing educational opportunities. This intervention demonstrated the potential of AI-assisted documentation to improve workflow efficiency and patient flow while supporting resident doctor training and reducing administrative burden in a surgical setting.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Qamar, A., Kelly, M., Maweni, R., Abdul-Hamid, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-31T09:08:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003910</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003910</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving ward round documentation using the Heidi Health application]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003910</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003910</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e004020?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Beyond the report: a qualitative exploration of safety incidents in maternity services]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e004020?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Maternal and neonatal mortality in the UK remains high, underscoring safety concerns in maternity care. Incident reporting remains a key mechanism for identifying risks and driving improvement, yet challenges, including underreporting and limited organisational learning, persist.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>The primary aim of the study was to explore clinicians&rsquo; preferences and behaviours in maternity patient safety reporting within a tertiary hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a two-phase qualitative study in a UK tertiary teaching hospital maternity service. Phase 1 involved AI-supported Big Qualitative (Big Qual) thematic analysis (using Caplena and Infranodus) of the first 400 patient safety incident reports submitted via the local electronic reporting system over a 5-month period (June&ndash;November 2024). Phase 2 comprised semistructured interviews with 14 maternity clinicians conducted between April and June 2025 and informed by phase 1 findings. Interview data were analysed using a Rapid Assessment Procedure and framework-based thematic analysis. Findings from both phases were integrated at the interpretation stage to examine reporting practices, barriers and enablers and opportunities for organisational learning, drawing on sociotechnical systems and safety-II-informed concepts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Thematic analysis of incident reports identified ten recurrent topics including staffing capacity, documentation discrepancies and communication issues. Interviews highlighted barriers such as psychological safety, form complexity and limited feedback, alongside enablers including visible learning and supportive leadership. Inconsistencies in reporting behaviours, feedback mechanisms and system integration were evident, with underreporting of near misses and staff conduct identified as key gaps.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study offers a nuanced view on how incident reporting is enacted in practice within maternity care. By combining interview data with Big Qual incident analysis, it identifies actionable insights for improving safety and organisational learning. Recommendations include simplifying reporting systems, embedding psychological safety, standardising processes and enhancing feedback and cross-professional learning.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beecham, E., Brady, G., Bondaronek, P., OCarroll, J., Siassakos, D., Glaser, S., Gilchrist, K., Dorey, J., Knagg, R., Vindrola-Padros, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-31T09:08:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-004020</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-004020</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Beyond the report: a qualitative exploration of safety incidents in maternity services]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e004020</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e004020</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e004040?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Engaging patient and family advisory councils (PFACs) in patient safety in healthcare organisations: a rapid scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e004040?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Enhancing patient safety is a global priority and active involvement of patient and family advisory councils (PFACs) has been proposed as a key strategy in this endeavour. Preparing and supporting PFAC&rsquo;s activities in the field of patient safety is a crucial step in sustainably implementing patient engagement in healthcare organisations. However, to what extent and through which means remains unclear. Considering these shortcomings, we aimed to synthesise the current literature base, identify and map existing resources designed to educate and support PFACs in patient safety within healthcare organisations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a rapid scoping review. Drawing on predefined eligibility criteria, we reviewed peer-reviewed and grey literature on educational resources on patient-safety-related topics aimed at PFACs in healthcare organisations. We searched three databases (PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus) as well as websites of relevant stakeholders and institutions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overall, we obtained 13 eligible sources. They featured resources ranging from reading materials to more intensive workshop sessions&mdash;combining active and passive learning approaches. Definition of key concepts and stakeholder roles were common topics in most sources. Yet, contents specific to patient safety showed considerable variability, likely due to context-specific approaches, local practices and lack of overall guidelines. Standardised resources tailored to PFACs&rsquo; unique needs in patient safety were largely absent.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This review highlights the limited availability of comprehensive, well-documented resources for PFACs. It further corroborates the need for systematic approaches to support patient engagement activities and meaningful involvement in patient safety.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Practice implications</st>
<p>Our findings provide a first synthesis of the literature, inform future research as well as the development of respective patient engagement initiatives in patient safety. Moreover, they underscore the importance of developing standardised, yet adaptable resources to equip PFACs for their role in fostering safer healthcare systems.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>DRKS00034733.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dervishi, Q. R., Blum, Y., Brust, L., Weigl, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-31T09:08:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-004040</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-004040</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Engaging patient and family advisory councils (PFACs) in patient safety in healthcare organisations: a rapid scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e004040</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e004040</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003616?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sociodemographic variation in the association between modes of access and patient experience of primary care: a retrospective cross-sectional patient-level analysis of the General Practice Patient Survey in England in 2023]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003616?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Patient experience is a key indicator of healthcare quality. Access to general practice (GP) has shifted with increasing use of digital tools for contacting practices and more remote consultations. These changes may improve patient experience, but unequally across sociodemographic groups. This study examines how patient experience of GP varies by access mode and sociodemographic characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 759 149 responses from the 2023 GP Patient Survey in England. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to examine associations between patient experience outcomes&mdash;appointment booking and healthcare professional communication&mdash;and access modes (online, telephone, in-person), adjusting for sociodemographic factors and practice-level clustering.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Online-only appointment booking methods were associated with a better experience of making an appointment (OR=1.14, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.17; p&lt;0.001) than traditional booking methods. All patient groups, except older adults and those not reporting male or female gender identities, reported better experiences with online-only appointment booking. Inequalities narrowed by age and ethnicity, with greater improvements for younger, Asian and mixed ethnicity patients, but widened for gender as non-binary and other identities reported poorer experiences. Remote consultations were associated with a poorer experience of healthcare professional communication (OR=0.52, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.52; p&lt;0.001) compared with face-to-face. This trend was consistent across all groups, with differences between most and least positive groups reducing for gender but remaining similar for deprivation, ethnicity and age.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Implications</st>
<p>Digital tools are associated with more positive experiences when contacting GP and may help reduce sociodemographic disparities, especially among groups who traditionally report poorer experience. Conversely, remote consultations are associated with worse experiences of healthcare professional communication. These patterns highlight the need for tailored approaches that offer choice across access modes, considering clinical need, urgency and patient preferences. Training for healthcare professionals should include remote communication skills. These insights can inform policies and service design aimed at modernising primary care while promoting equity.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marks, T., Ge, X., Opie-Martin, S., Clarke, J. M., Xu, Y., Brine, R., Bakhai, M., Clarke, G. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T06:02:49-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003616</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003616</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sociodemographic variation in the association between modes of access and patient experience of primary care: a retrospective cross-sectional patient-level analysis of the General Practice Patient Survey in England in 2023]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003616</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003616</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003654?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Addressing barriers to CGM prescriptions in primary care: a quality improvement initiative]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003654?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The American Diabetes Association has declared continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use to be the standard of care in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) on insulin. While primary care providers (PCPs) manage most patients with DM, the adoption of CGMs in the primary care setting remains significantly lower than in endocrinology practices. PCPs have reported education, insurance authorisation and challenges of a PCP environment as significant barriers to CGM use. Our project sought to increase CGM prescriptions at our academic primary care clinic by creating tools to address these barriers.</p>
<p>This is a single-centre quality improvement study at our academic primary care practice with the aim to increase CGM prescriptions in our patients with DM prescribed insulin, excluding patients seen by the endocrinology department. Three interventions were introduced over a 10-month period: (1) an educational pamphlet detailing insurance coverage, ordering and documentation requirements, (2) electronic health record tools to aid in ordering and documentation and (3) a didactic session focused on CGM data interpretation. The number of CGM prescriptions beginning August 2024 was reported monthly. Provider comfort with CGM prescription and data interpretation was assessed using a Likert scale of 1&ndash;5 (5 being the most comfortable).</p>
<p>Following all three interventions, CGM prescriptions increased by 6.6%. On survey, providers reported improvements in correctly prescribing CGMs and comfort in interpreting CGM data. Referrals to endocrinology for type 2 DM also decreased by 25.3%.</p>
<p>Despite known benefits of use in DM care, CGMs are underused in the primary care setting. Provider education and tools led to an increase in CGM prescriptions and improved PCP comfort with CGM use. These interventions demonstrate an effective way to address key barriers to CGM use in primary care.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yoo, A., Cherayil, N., Sanchez Rosado, R., Rubin, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T06:02:49-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003654</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003654</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Addressing barriers to CGM prescriptions in primary care: a quality improvement initiative]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003654</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003654</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003848?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving care for complex brain disorders: insights from patient experiences in a Canadian brain medicine clinic]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003848?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Little is known about best practices in service delivery for people experiencing complex brain disorders (CBDs) involving affective, behavioural, and cognitive symptoms. We aimed to assess the experiences and perceived healthcare needs of patients at a Brain Medicine Clinic (BMC), using their insights to drive improvements in care delivery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We contacted all patients seen in the BMC between May and July 2024 and recruited 15 participants. We conducted 30 min semi-structured interviews that were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Line-by-line coding was performed inductively using NVivo V.14 software, followed by a thematic analysis to identify emerging themes and subthemes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three main themes were identified as being related to care quality at the BMC: (1) Access, Navigation and Coordination, (2) Knowledge Translation and (3) Therapeutic Alliance. Based on these themes, three key practice recommendations were developed for care quality improvement, including (1) introducing a care navigator, (2) the provision of structured after-visit summaries and preparatory materials and (3) integrating empathy and communication training into the education of practitioners delivering this care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The results support the need for and underscore the benefits of integrated care models in managing CBDs, such as a BMC. Future studies should evaluate the effects of implementing the proposed recommendations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saul, K., Hanafi, S., Voronov, J., Dubey, S., Skowronski, K., Levitt, S., Mitchell, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T06:02:49-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003848</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003848</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving care for complex brain disorders: insights from patient experiences in a Canadian brain medicine clinic]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003848</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003848</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003753?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Scalable treatment algorithm focused on hypertension management for the University of California]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003753?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Uncontrolled hypertension remains a leading contributor to morbidity and mortality, particularly among underserved populations. To address care variability and disparities in treatment, the University of California Health system developed and implemented the UC Way Hypertension Medication Algorithm across six academic health centres. This standardised, evidence-based protocol was co-developed by a team of multidisciplinary experts in pharmacy, cardiology, primary care and data science, with an emphasis on medication affordability and the use of two-drug fixed dose combinations as first-line therapy. Implementation strategies included stakeholder engagement, clinician education and integration into electronic health records and routine workflows. The algorithm now informs treatment decisions for over 90000 patients with hypertension and has been associated with improvements in hypertension control. The manuscript focuses on the process of algorithm development, adaptation within a complex multi-payer environment and lessons learned in promoting standardisation, clinician uptake and health equity at scale. This model may inform similar efforts across other decentralised health systems seeking to optimise chronic disease management.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kishore, S. P., Martin, H. E., Friedberg, N., Narang, P., Sak, R., Skootsky, S. A., UC Way Hypertension Initiative Medication Use Collaborators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T06:00:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003753</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003753</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Scalable treatment algorithm focused on hypertension management for the University of California]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003753</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003753</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003859?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving GIRFT compliance and patient experience of accessibility and shared decision making for elective hip and knee replacement: incorporation of a digital patient information leaflet]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003859?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate whether QR (Quick Response) code-linked digital patient information leaflets (PILs) improve documentation of shared decision making (SDM) and patient experience in elective hip and knee replacement clinics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A two-cycle quality improvement project (completed audit loop) comparing preintervention and postintervention outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Elective orthopaedic clinics in a UK district general hospital (secondary care).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients listed for elective hip or knee replacement during two 6-week periods (25 in cycle 1; 43 in cycle 2). Patients with incomplete records or not assessed face-to-face were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Introduction of QR code-linked digital PILs between audit cycles, provided at clinic appointments. The resource included procedure information, anaesthetic options, recovery expectations and links to translation services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes were documentation rates of PIL provision and key SDM domains in line with NICE NG157 (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Guidance) and GIRFT (Getting it Right First Time) standards. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported measures of clarity, usability, accessibility and preference, obtained through an anonymous Likert-scale survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Documentation that a PIL had been offered increased from 7% (hip) and 9% (knee) in cycle 1 to 24% and 36% in cycle 2. Documentation of patient understanding rose from 79% to 90%, and recovery expectations from &le;9% to 36%. Survey results showed 100% of respondents found the digital information clear, 86% preferred it over paper and 71% reported greater engagement with the digital format.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>QR code-linked digital PILs improved documentation, engagement and accessibility in elective orthopaedic clinics. This low-cost, scalable intervention supports national guidance on SDM, aligns with NHS (National Health Service) Green Plan sustainability goals and has potential for spread to other surgical pathways.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mujahid, S., McManus, R., Sidaginamale, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-10T06:37:57-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003859</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003859</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving GIRFT compliance and patient experience of accessibility and shared decision making for elective hip and knee replacement: incorporation of a digital patient information leaflet]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003859</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003859</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003665?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improved pain management after tonsil surgery in adults: a quality improvement programme]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003665?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>During 2018&ndash;2020, data from the Norwegian Tonsil Surgery Register (NTSR) showed large differences in recontact rates due to postoperative pain in the participating ear, nose and throat (ENT) units. On average, 27% (range 12&ndash;39%) of the patients had contacted the healthcare system due to problems with postoperative pain after tonsil surgery. Because of these high rates and large variations, we conducted a quality improvement project introducing a standardised pain management programme for adult patients. The goal was to reduce the pain-related recontact rate to below 15% in the participating ENT units.</p>
<p>Five ENT units with an average recontact rate of 33.6% (range 29.0&ndash;38.1%) participated in this project. In a workshop, the units agreed on a standardised pain management programme consisting of a patient information brochure and a prescription including multimodal analgesics with paracetamol and COX-2 inhibitor (etoricoxib) with supplementary analgesic (tramadol). The units introduced the programme in their daily practice from June 2022 to July 2024. At follow-up in 2024, the recontact rate had decreased from 33.6% to 15.5% in the participating units.</p>
<p>Introducing a standardised pain management programme, including a standard prescription of analgesics and a standard patient information brochure, seems to improve the patients&rsquo; pain management after tonsil surgery. This study shows that data from the NTSR can identify areas requiring improvement, initiate improvement projects and evaluate the changes in clinical practice.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilsen, A. H., Wennberg, S., Amundsen, M. F., Blindheimsvik, M. A. B., Tappert, C., Bugten, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-09T06:10:05-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003665</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003665</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improved pain management after tonsil surgery in adults: a quality improvement programme]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003665</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003665</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003494?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Achieving effective and timely quality of care in same-day discharge total hip arthroplasty without compromising patient safety]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003494?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Using quality improvement (QI) processes, we sought to safely achieve &gt;80% efficiency in same-day discharge (SDD) of eligible primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A "Plan-Do-Study-Act" approach was used. QI elements included: research of prior relevant publications, clinical audit for data-driven evaluation, service evaluation assessments and clinical transformation on a small scale for piloting change. Care interventions were introduced within an already established highly iterative and enhanced recovery after surgery-based programme. Intervention 1 established patient eligibility. Those eligible could be SDD once discharge criteria were met (the "Standard" cohort). Intervention 2 implemented "Enhanced Recovery Canada" (ERC) recommendations for pre-emptive nausea and pain management, and lidocaine-based regional surgical anaesthesia (the "ERC" cohort). Intervention 3 changed from epidural to spinal lidocaine for surgical anaesthesia. This cohort was evaluated as part of the ERC cohort, as well as a stand-alone Lidocaine Spinal cohort. Clinical audits were the main comparative benchmarks. Improved rates of SDD were the primary measure of success. Safety was based on rates of unscheduled hospital encounters within 30-days of surgery. Data was collected prospectively and analysed using logistic regression, adjusting for age and gender. Patient satisfaction was also surveyed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The ERC cohort had significantly greater odds of successful SDD compared to the standard group (74.4% vs 54.3%, OR 2.51, p=0.0015). Odds were even higher for Lidocaine Spinal (80.6% vs 54.3%, OR 3.4, 95% CI (1.34 to 8.66), p=0.0102). There was no significant difference in the rates of unscheduled 30-day hospital encounters. The ERC group experienced fewer complications that prevented SDD (25.6% vs 45.7%, OR 0.41, p=0.0015). Patient satisfaction scores were high in the Spinal Lidocaine group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Implementing ERC recommendations significantly improved SDD rates for THA without increasing postoperative complication rates. This suggests that targeted interventions can enhance the efficiency of SDD THA programmes without compromising patient safety.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Young, D. J., Hsieh, M., Sadiq, I., Askari, A., Greidanus, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-04T04:30:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003494</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003494</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Achieving effective and timely quality of care in same-day discharge total hip arthroplasty without compromising patient safety]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003494</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003494</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003724?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['Situation awareness in midwifery practice: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003724?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Failure of situational awareness (SA) has been identified as a common theme in potentially avoidable maternal and infant deaths, although the empirical basis for this attribution is unclear. Situation awareness is arguably a contentious issue which needs to be studied methodically to ascertain the theoretical and practical relevance to midwifery to better inform the application of this concept to the clinical context&mdash;rather than seemingly and uncritically import the construct from other healthcare areas and safety-critical sectors unrelated to midwifery practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To identify how situation awareness is defined, understood, measured and interpreted within the midwifery care safety context as a precursor to further research which may contribute to improvements in safety of maternity care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A scoping review was conducted using a well-established methodological framework. A comprehensive literature search yielded 259 articles, of which 11 were included in the final review. Data from each article were extracted, charted and subjected to a thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>All primary research papers applied Endsley&rsquo;s original definition of situation awareness, either explicitly or implicitly. Team SA was viewed as an aggregate of individual clinicians&rsquo; SA. Only two of the studies attempted to measure SA; others made inferences about levels of SA based on observable features of teamwork.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Endsley&rsquo;s model of SA has been applied to midwifery without full consideration of whether this theoretical construct is appropriate for this clinical context. Other extended SA models exist which could arguably provide a more informed systems-theoretic approach to maternity care safety, consistent with the current drive towards embedding systems thinking and creating a Just Culture in healthcare organisations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Budd, R., Bowie, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-04T04:30:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003724</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003724</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA['Situation awareness in midwifery practice: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003724</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003724</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003746?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of establishing a comprehensive tobacco cessation service at a primary healthcare setting in the quit attempts: a quality improvement project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003746?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In 2005, Oman ratified the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC), committing to reduce tobacco use through best-practice cessation services, including access to counselling, pharmacotherapy and a toll-free Quitline. However, Oman currently lacks a national cessation programme that fully meets WHO FCTC standards. This study evaluated the impact of implementing a best-practice tobacco cessation service at North Al-Khuwair Health Center (NKHC) on quit attempts among tobacco users.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A quality improvement initiative was implemented at NKHC using a Plan-Do-Study-Act approach to establish a best-practice cessation service. The study included all tobacco users attending NKHC from July 2024 to March 2025. Very brief advice was provided at each clinical encounter, and those expressing readiness to quit were enrolled in the specialised cessation clinic, where they received free behavioural and pharmacological support. All participants were followed according to the clinic protocol. The primary outcome was a quit attempt.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Before July 2024, NKHC had no operational cessation service. Between July 2024 and March 2025, 30 tobacco users attended the clinic. Over half (n=17, 56.7%) were over 40 years of age, while 16.7% were younger than 18. Most participants were male (n=29, 96.7%), married (n=23, 76.7%), employed (n=23, 76.7%) and used smoked tobacco products (n=24, 80.0%). Tobacco use frequently occurred at home (n=12, 40.0%) or with friends (n=15, 30.0%). Nearly two-thirds of tobacco users (n=19, 63.3%) were exposed to secondhand smoke. Mental health conditions were reported among 13.3% of users. Nearly half had attempted to quit previously, mostly using the cold turkey method. All participants were asked and advised to quit; 80.0% were ready to quit, and most (88.9%) made a quit attempt.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Establishing best-practice tobacco cessation services in primary healthcare can increase readiness to quit and promote quit attempts. Further studies are required to assess quit rates.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al-Kalbani, S. R., Al-Lawati, A. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-04T04:30:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003746</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003746</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of establishing a comprehensive tobacco cessation service at a primary healthcare setting in the quit attempts: a quality improvement project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003746</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003746</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003730?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient safety culture and associated factors among healthcare professionals at public hospitals in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003730?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Improving patient safety in healthcare settings requires a culture of shared values, beliefs, attitudes, perceptions and knowledge. Despite the fact that medical errors are inevitable, patient safety culture (PSC) initiatives may be able to lessen their frequency and effects. To improve patient safety, it is essential to investigate how healthcare professionals see hospital PSC. In Ethiopia, no evidence has been studied nationally. In order to assess the pooled status of PSC and its associated factors at Ethiopian public hospitals, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines were followed throughout our study. Pub-Med, CINAHL, Web of Sciences, Google Scholar and repository databases were used for the search. Stata V.17 was used to analyse the data using the random-effects model. Forest plots were used to present the pooled results.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 6583 participants were involved in 16 studies that were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The overall PSC for healthcare professionals working in Ethiopian public hospitals was found to be 47.78% (95% CI 44.72 to 50.84; I<sup>2</sup>=84.56%). &lsquo;Teamwork within units&rsquo; was the only PSC dimension with a satisfactory percentage of positive responses (75.53%; 95% CI 73.57 to 77.49). Compared with other hospital settings (48.77%), PSC at referral hospitals was lower (43.49%). A positive response rate to overall PSC was significantly predicted by being a nurse or midwife (OR=3.06; 95% CI 1.27 to 7.41), participating in patient safety training (OR=3.23; 95% CI 2.33 to 4.48), having a BSc degree or higher (OR=2.62; 95% CI 1.56 to 4.38), working in medical-surgical units (OR=4.32; 95% CI 2.71 to 6.90) and having more work experience (OR=5.69; 95% CI 2.52 to 12.87).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The pooled status of PSC among healthcare professionals in Ethiopia is low. Compared with other hospital settings, the PSC was lower in referral hospitals. A higher positive response rate to the overall PSC was predicted by professional type, educational attainment, patient safety training, working units and longer work experiences. In order to promote patient safety, the Ministry of Health, hospital managers and policymakers must work collaboratively by launching initiatives to strengthen a positive PSC.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alemu, A. T., Geddif, A., Kassie, G. G., Mitiku, K. W., Belay, M. A., Simegn, M. B., Chanie, S. D., Tilahun, W. M., Menber, Y., Wasihun, Y., Gebreegziabher, Z. A., Andualem, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:41:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003730</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003730</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient safety culture and associated factors among healthcare professionals at public hospitals in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003730</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003730</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003640?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identifying health economic competencies for quality improvement practitioners and educators: a mixed-methods study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003640?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To identify health economic evaluation competencies to guide quality improvement (QI) practice and education in Ireland.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A parallel mixed-methods design was used. A rapid review profiled the focus (cost containment, efficiency and/or equity) and purpose (education, assessment, health system improvement) of health economic evaluation competencies used in healthcare education and management. In parallel, surveys were sent to senior healthcare leaders (N=528) and quality and healthcare management scholars (N=286) in Ireland. These examined knowledge, skills and experiences of using health economics in managing quality and safety, and the perceived usefulness of proposed competencies. Descriptive statistics were generated. Literature and survey findings were integrated to refine the competencies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the few competencies available from the literature, most had a multiple focus and purpose. Yet, none were focused on equity and few were used to assess competence. Of 189 survey respondents, few had received training in health economics (25%) or been involved in measurement of healthcare costs (34%), value for money (29%) or budget impact (23%). Barriers were terminology and inadequate infrastructure for linking clinical and financial data. Most (90&ndash;95%) endorsed the usefulness of proposed competencies. These were refined to form four major competencies: (1) understand the relationship between cost and quality in healthcare, (2) assess the basic costs and outcomes of a QI initiative, (3) understand and apply cost-effectiveness analysis to QI initiatives and (4) advance capacity for improvement by applying cost-effectiveness analysis to decision-making. Each major competency had four to six sub-competencies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Health economic competencies should be integral to healthcare professionals&rsquo; and managers&rsquo; education and professional development.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McCarthy, S. E., Hammond, L., OMahony, J. F., Lachman, P., Sorensen, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-02T04:32:06-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003640</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003640</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identifying health economic competencies for quality improvement practitioners and educators: a mixed-methods study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003640</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003640</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003972?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Interruptions and multitasking in anaesthesia nursing: a prospective observational study of cognitive strain and workflow patterns]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003972?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>In critical fields such as anaesthesiology, maintaining uninterrupted focus during key procedures, particularly during critical phases of anaesthesia care, such as induction and extubation, is crucial for patient safety. Multitasking and interruptions in healthcare settings have been linked to increased error rates and reduced efficiency. This study comprises two parts: (1) an objective observational analysis of multitasking and interruptions and (2) an exploratory examination of their relationship to perceived work-related stress, perceived error risk and job satisfaction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In this prospective observational study, 19 anaesthesia nurses at the University Hospital in Wu&#x0308;rzburg were observed during 30 field sessions. The study used the Work Observation Method by Activity Timing application for real-time recording and classification of tasks into primary activities (core clinical tasks), secondary activities (parallel tasks, ie, multitasking) and interruptions (externally triggered interruptions leading to task cessation). Spearman&rsquo;s rank correlation coefficients were calculated to examine associations between observational data and subjective ratings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Interruptions accounted for 4% of the total observation time, with secondary activities being performed during 8.5% of the time. The average duration of interruptions was 36 s. Primary activities constituted 74.36% of all tasks, with communication-related interruptions being the most frequent. Preparatory work comprised more than half of the total duration of primary activities. Communication tasks were the dominant event during secondary activities, with a significant number of steps associated with them. On a subjective level, a strong positive correlation was found between perceived stress and error potential.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Interruptions and secondary activities were common in anaesthesia nursing workflows but accounted for only a small proportion of total working time. Most interruptions involved communication required for perioperative coordination. Step-based movement estimates showed substantial physical workload, with walking activity unevenly distributed across task categories and predominantly occurring during primary activities.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ho&#x0308;lzing, C. R., Heilgenthal, P., Sellmann, F., Meynhardt, C., Grundgeiger, T., Scheuchenpflug, R., Meybohm, P., Happel, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-02T04:32:06-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003972</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003972</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Interruptions and multitasking in anaesthesia nursing: a prospective observational study of cognitive strain and workflow patterns]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003972</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003972</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003843?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Russian experience in healthcare quality assurance through standards of care: 2014-2023]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003843?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The Russian Federation inherited from the USSR a vast and poor healthcare system. Since 1996, the move to evidence-guided care has been initiated. The objective is to describe the last 10 years&rsquo; significant progress in the development of the centralised system of guidelines and quality assurance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>For the narrative review, we searched MEDLINE and the Central Medical Library, Moscow for reports relevant to the quality of healthcare and used our collections of the grey literature for the policy review. Neither patients nor the public were involved in the design and execution of this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Legislation 2011 recognised clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) as an important tool in developing evidence-based practice. On top of the system are regulations of a new type&mdash;orders of medical care&mdash;which prescribe the patients&rsquo; track in the healthcare system, as well as the necessary staffing and equipment for participating organisations. CPGs describe the recommended interventions. Third, documents called &lsquo;standards&rsquo; are derived from CPGs to calculate the average cost for costing diagnosis related groups and informing other payment decisions. At the same time, the Ministry of Health promotes the certification of medical organisations and introduces lean at the outpatient facilities. The criminal prosecution of physicians became more frequent, disturbing the profession.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A wide range of initiatives in quality assurance promise improvement in the quality of health care. Unfortunately, the insufficient and reduced funding, as well as solutions with unknown effectiveness, may limit prospects for improvement.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlassov, V., Gabuniya, N., Vlasova, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-27T05:12:11-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003843</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003843</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Russian experience in healthcare quality assurance through standards of care: 2014-2023]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003843</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003843</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003031?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reducing wait times for hospital-based outpatient mental healthcare: what works?]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003031?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Our hospital is an urban academic multisite facility in Southwestern Ontario. The General Adult Ambulatory Mental Health Service (GAAMHS) delivers acute urgent and non-urgent outpatient (O-P) psychiatric care for adults 18 to 64 years. In the context of sub-optimal physician resources and the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an accumulation of 812 non-urgent referrals in March 2021. Manual review of the number of incoming referrals and processing timelines estimated a wait time of 9 to 12 months to see a psychiatrist. This quality improvement project was conducted to resolve the backlog of referrals and to reduce the wait times for the incoming non-urgent referrals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This project was developed and implemented by the core team of a programme manager, an administrative assistant (AA) and a psychiatrist. It was achieved without any additional funding for project management. Process mapping of various components of GAAMHS was completed and an Ishikawa diagram was created to identify factors contributing to the backlog. Quality improvement change ideas were proposed and tested using Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. The interventions included reassessment of patient needs, implementation of an electronic data capture tool and team-based model of care, refining the referral triage process and standardising the service delivery practices of psychiatrists.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The 812 backlogged referrals were resolved in a median of 5.3 months. The average number of new consultations and total O-P visits per full-time psychiatrist per month was 10.3 &plusmn;3.6 and 74.5&plusmn;15.9, respectively, in 2020; it increased to 17.1&plusmn;7.9 and 80.8&plusmn;21.6 in 2022 and 18.8&plusmn;8.9 and 90.0&plusmn;20.2 in 2023. The wait times for the new incoming referrals have continued to decrease with the median wait times in December 2023 being 102 days and the wait times for the 75th percentile being 145 days.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>A combination of strategies helped resolve the backlog and reduce wait times to access acute O-P mental health.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oneschuk, H., Tuckerman, A., Archer, C., Vasudev, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-26T04:43:53-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003031</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003031</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reducing wait times for hospital-based outpatient mental healthcare: what works?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003031</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003031</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003639?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comprehensive recommendations for the implementation of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a narrative review on facilitators and barriers]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003639?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies into clinical practice holds significant promise for enhancing healthcare delivery, yet substantial barriers remain to their widespread adoption. This narrative review aimed, first, to identify key facilitators and barriers to the implementation of AI technologies in patient care, and, second, to introduce a comprehensive list of evidence-based recommendations for successful AI integration in healthcare organisations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We conducted a narrative review across four electronic databases to identify peer-reviewed studies published within the last decade. Following the stepwise selection and review procedure, thematic content analysis was performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Sample</st>
<p>A total of 26 studies was included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We identified 55 dimensions of facilitators or barriers to AI implementation. These were classified according to the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety work system model. Key dimensions included efficiency, compatibility with local IT infrastructure, stakeholder involvement, transparency and clinician trust. Drawing upon the 25 most frequently reported dimensions of facilitators and barriers, we developed a set of recommendations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This review consolidates the current literature on implementation challenges of AI in everyday clinical care practice to offer insights for healthcare organisations and professionals to navigate the challenges of AI implementation. Our findings provide a comprehensive overview of the sociotechnical complexities surrounding AI adoption, and our compilation of recommendations can help to guide future efforts in leveraging AI to improve clinical workflows and patient care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wenderott, K., Krups, J., Weigl, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-26T04:43:53-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003639</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003639</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comprehensive recommendations for the implementation of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a narrative review on facilitators and barriers]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003639</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003639</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003716?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Leading across boundaries: establishment of the UCLH community outreach intrathecal baclofen refill service]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003716?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) is a recognised treatment for severe spasticity. ITB users need to attend a specialist clinic regularly for their pump to be refilled and reprogrammed. Many patients travel significant distances and require hospital transport which is inconvenient, stressful and costly. These challenges inspired the University College London Hospitals (UCLH) spasticity team to explore establishing a community outreach clinic, staffed by the UCLH team, to provide care closer to home for this complex group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>By mapping the patient cohort, using their general practitioner postcode, we identified patient clusters including those in the same long-term care facilities. In tandem, accessible healthcare locations within North Central London were identified and approached.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The UCLH ITB outreach service was launched in December 2022. Over the next 15 months a total of six sites were established. In 2024, over a 12 month period, 28 outreach clinics were completed, with a total of 125 patients assessed and pumps refilled in the community. Transport and healthcare cost savings were realised, and patients reported positive, practical and emotional benefits.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This initiative improved patient care as well as creating a local strategy for joint working through forging new relationships and embracing shared learning</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keenan, E., Ang, K., Lee, H., Betteridge, N., Chal, D., OConnell, R., Buchanan, K., Stevenson, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-26T04:43:53-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003716</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003716</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Leading across boundaries: establishment of the UCLH community outreach intrathecal baclofen refill service]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003716</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003716</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003900?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Where is the patient in the records? Evaluating physiotherapists first visit in occupational health primary care pathway for low back pain]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003900?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Clinical guidelines recommend a biopsychosocial approach to low back pain (LBP) management, with physiotherapists playing a key role in occupational health primary care (OHPC). However, little is known about how their clinical behaviours at the first visit align with guideline-oriented biopsychosocial principles. Therefore, we evaluated LBP management quality in OHPC by applying predefined criteria to physiotherapists&rsquo; documentation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Based on a cluster-randomised implementation study data (ISRCTN11875357) we analysed 98 electronic patient records (EPRs) documented by 28 physiotherapists across diverse OHPC units. The intervention arm had received 3&ndash;7 days of biopsychosocial training. A stratified random sample of EPRs from individuals with LBP was reviewed using a structured researcher&rsquo;s evaluation tool. Each item was scored dichotomously (yes/no) and evaluated against predefined quality criteria with stepwise thresholds for different work disability risk groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Step I, multidimensional biopsychosocial assessment of LBP, was documented in fewer than half of the records (36.5% in the intervention vs 16.7% in the control arm, p=0.081). The biological dimension was well documented in both arms (100% vs 95.8%, p=0.245), while psychological (58.1% vs 25%, p=0.009) and social (54.1% vs 29.2%, p=0.038) dimensions were more frequently documented in the intervention arm.</p>
<p>Step II quality criteria (low-risk patients) were met in 58.1% of intervention versus 4.2% of control records (p&lt;0.001), and step III (medium-risk) in 55.4% versus 4.2% (p&lt;0.001). No EPRs met step IV (high-risk) quality criteria.</p>
<p>The intervention arm more often documented psychosocial assessments, risk stratification, behavioural strategies and advice to stay active. Person-centredness (ie, goals, values, resources, expectations) was rarely documented (36.5% vs 0%, p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Training in guideline-oriented biopsychosocial approach was associated with more frequent documentation of behaviours aligned with high-quality LBP management. However, overall quality varied, and person-centred aspects remained underreported. Complementary implementation strategies are required to ensure consistent delivery and documentation of biopsychosocial clinical practice in OHPC.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paukkunen, M., O&#x0308;berg, B., Karppinen, J., Ala-Mursula, L., Ryyna&#x0308;nen, K., Holopainen, R., Abbott, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-26T04:43:53-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003900</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003900</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Where is the patient in the records? Evaluating physiotherapists first visit in occupational health primary care pathway for low back pain]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003900</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003900</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003949?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rapid response teams for new leaders: a narrative review of global evidence and implementation strategies with a focus on Japan]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003949?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Rapid response systems (RRSs) are designed to detect and treat physiological deterioration before cardiac arrest occurs. Since2020, Japan has seen a rapid increase in RRS adoption; however, most new team members have not received formal training in critical care. This review synthesises international and Japanese evidence supporting implementation and training for new members.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>PubMed, Web of Science and Ichushi Web were searched for English or Japanese studies evaluating adult RRSs (January2010&ndash;April2025). We included 47 records (43 comparative and 4 systematic reviews); the national guideline was not included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Mature RRSs were associated with a 35% relative reduction in unexpected in-hospital cardiac arrests and a 12% decrease in all-cause hospital mortality. However, the evidence is not uniformly positive&mdash;systematic reviews and multicentre analyses reported no significant mortality benefit&mdash;and outcome heterogeneity limits comparability. Effective programmes share three key features: (1) single-parameter activation criteria augmented by early-warning scores; (2) tiered response models for advanced practice nurses and (3) audit-feedback cycles with dashboards. Crew resource management, in situ simulation and mindfulness-based self-leadership approaches may be associated with reduced decision latency. Emerging tools like deep-learning prediction algorithms, continuous wearable monitoring and tele-support systems may expand coverage but require governance. Common barriers include limited night-time staffing, cultural reluctance to escalate care and medicolegal ambiguity; targeted education and registry-driven feedback mitigate challenges.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Well-structured RRSs improve outcomes beyond traditional code-blue models. Aligning activation thresholds, multidisciplinary competencies and data-driven quality improvement cycles with local resources may help new Japanese rapid response team members develop resilient, high-performing services.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogawa, A., Tsuchiya, Y., Sakemi, I., Kutsuna, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T03:44:30-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003949</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003949</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rapid response teams for new leaders: a narrative review of global evidence and implementation strategies with a focus on Japan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003949</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003949</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003777?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hospital standardised mortality ratio: a novel method and approach to risk adjustment]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003777?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Hospital standardised mortality ratio (HSMR) is a simple ratio that is plagued by sparsity, dimensionality, overdispersion, exclusions and controversy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Describe Hospital Outcome Prediction Equation V.7 (HOPE-7) methodology.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>State of Victoria (Australia), population 6.8 million.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Multiphase process: (a) principal diagnoses aggregated into 406 clinical diagnosis groups (CDGs); (b) low case fatality rate (CFR&lt;0.02%) CDGs set aside; (c) remaining CDGs ranked according to predicted risk; (d) final generalised linear model fitted to (75%) training dataset; (e) low-risk cases reinserted and allocated zero risk; (e) model performance in validation dataset assessed for calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit (H<SUB>10</SUB>), Brier score, calibration plot), discrimination (area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUCROC) and area under the precision recall (AUCPRC) curves) and classification (dispersion value (), SD random effect ()). Ideal model: Brier score~0, H<SUB>10</SUB> p value&gt;0.05, AUCROC&gt;0.80, AUCPRC&gt;0.30, ~1 and ~0. Classification assessed by proportion of outlier CFR reclassified as inlier HSMR.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>315 hospitals treated 12.97 million adult separations and 152 (48.3%) reported 63 806 in-hospital deaths, 0.49 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.50) per 100 separations. 10 722 principal diagnoses allocated to 198 non-significant CDGs, 45 low-risk CDGs (5.05 million cases) assigned zero risk and 163 significant CDGs aggregated to 20 risk ranks. Final model (development cohort 9.73 million) included demographic variables (age, birth sex, emergency, aged-care resident, hospital transfer, relationship status), one interaction term (emergency transfer) and 20 diagnosis-risk categories. Validation metrics (cohort 3.24 million): Brier score 0.015; H<SUB>10</SUB> p value 0.09; AUCROC 0.90 (95% CI 0.87 to 0.92); AUCPRC 0.28 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.31); =4.31 and =0.24. Study hospitals generated 2192 hospital quarters with 2053 (95.7%) outlier CFR values, of which 1975 (96.2%) reclassified as HSMR inliers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>HOPE-7 is a parsimonious and pragmatic HSMR model based on administrative data common to many jurisdictions that displayed satisfactory calibration, classification and discrimination metrics and addressed frequent HSMR limitations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Duke, G. J., Hirth, S., Santamaria, J. D., Hamilton, A., Lau, M., Li, Z., Le, T., Fernando, D. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-20T07:21:04-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003777</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003777</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hospital standardised mortality ratio: a novel method and approach to risk adjustment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003777</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003777</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003630?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving social needs screening in general paediatrics through project SEEK]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003630?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Unmet social needs in paediatric patients contribute to poor health outcomes and increased healthcare utilisation. In order to identify unmet social needs, we aimed to improve social determinant of health (SDoH) screening of children admitted to the general paediatrics teams at our institution. Between September 2021 and September 2024, we conducted a quality improvement project by a multidisciplinary stakeholder team to improve identification of unmet social needs at our institution. We set two aims: (1) develop a screening process acceptable to families and (2) increase the percentage of children admitted to general paediatrics with SDoH screening documented across four domains, including food insecurity, transportation barriers, housing insecurity and financial strain from 0% to 60%. During the project period, 4229 patients were eligible for screening. Screening was found to be acceptable by a pilot group of patients and their families (n=22). Rates of screening improved from 0% to 56.7% after various interventions, including nursing education and feedback, providing meal trays from the cafeteria to families in need, and integration of the screening questionnaire into the electronic health record. Food insecurity screening positively correlated with SDoH screening across all four domains. This multidisciplinary quality improvement project implemented SDoH screening on general paediatrics which was found acceptable by patients, and rates of screening improved by addressing identified needs. Tangible resources, such as providing meal trays during the hospitalisation, were a unique aspect of this project that helped families and alleviated distress of the screeners.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Feeney, C., Monroe, B., Agbim, C., Kamath, S., Parente, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-18T05:49:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003630</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003630</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving social needs screening in general paediatrics through project SEEK]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003630</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003630</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003815?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Implementing consistent pretreatment multidisciplinary review for breast cancer: a quality improvement project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003815?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Modern breast cancer care is multimodal and multidisciplinary, and a lack of structured communication between members in different disciplines can introduce obstacles in a patient&rsquo;s journey, resulting in potential treatment delays. In this study, we aimed to increase the percentage of more complex breast cancer cases reviewed pretreatment in a multidisciplinary setting in order to improve breast cancer management at our breast programme. We first started by examining cases of a lower volume complex procedure, oncoplastic breast reconstruction, and aimed to increase the number reviewed preoperatively from 0% to 50% by May 2023. We then expanded the process to include all cases categorised as &lsquo;complex&rsquo;, aiming to increase the number reviewed from 0% to 50% by April 2024. We prospectively collected data on all triaged cancer cases to track the number of cases reviewed, with the conclusion that both aims were achieved. Feedback surveys were distributed to conference members at three study time points to assess benefits, challenges, perceptions of the process and ideas for department-specific sustainability. Our findings emphasise that pretreatment review is effective, with 23% of cases resulting in management changes directly as a result of review.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Makarova, K., Chiu, A., Warburton, R., Bazzarelli, A., Deban, M., Dingee, C., Newman-Bremang, J., Pao, J.-S., McKevitt, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-15T10:01:03-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003815</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003815</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Implementing consistent pretreatment multidisciplinary review for breast cancer: a quality improvement project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003815</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003815</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e004015?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Best possible medication history interview guide: a rapid scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e004015?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Adverse drug events are a significant cause of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. The Best Possible Medication History (BPMH) is a systematic compilation of a patient&rsquo;s medications derived using at least two sources of information including a patient interview. We sought to update the BPMH interview guide developed by the Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) Canada to reflect the evolving healthcare landscape.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>We conducted a rapid scoping review to develop questions and a standardised procedure for completing a BPMH, and to understand patient, caregiver, and healthcare professional preferences or perceptions regarding the BPMH interview.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We searched Medline, the Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence-Based Practice Database, the Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews database, and grey literature. We included peer-reviewed quantitative literature (randomised/non-randomised controlled trials, observational studies), qualitative studies, systematic reviews, and grey literature (including guidelines, quality improvement initiatives, patient experiences, health technology assessments). Following pilot testing to ensure inter-rater reliability, articles were screened and data extracted in duplicate using the Covidence platform. INPLASY registration protocol INPLASY2024110033.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Our search identified 5424 records, and after removing duplicates and screening, we extracted data from 95 articles. Identified studies provided additional questions and procedural steps for assessing adherence, use of non-prescription medications and substances (eg, alcohol, smoking, cannabis, recreational use), and integration of virtual care into the BPMH guide. Perceived facilitators and barriers to conducting a BPMH included clinical leadership support for trained healthcare professionals to perform a BPMH, virtual care, access to technology, and intact hearing for patients or interviewed caregivers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This review identified additional questions and approaches for updating the ISMP Canada BPMH interview guide. Additional feedback from users of the existing interview guide, and patients and caregivers who have participated in a BPMH interview should be integrated through codesign into the new updated ISMP Canada BPMH guide.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>INPLASY2024110033</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ho, J. M.-W., Tung, J. M., Watt, A., Antoniou, T., Yantha, D., Hoffman, C., Golding, D., Hyland, S., Dulong, C., Benjamin, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-15T10:01:03-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-004015</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-004015</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Best possible medication history interview guide: a rapid scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e004015</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e004015</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003595?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Building capacity for integrated health care--nursing education initiatives in a Canadian mental health setting]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003595?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Individuals with serious mental illness at a Toronto mental health hospital receive interdisciplinary team (IDT) care through a reverse integration model supporting both mental and physical health. Nurses play a central role in this model, yet face barriers including unclear role definitions, limited resources and workflow constraints. Enhancing nursing autonomy and IDT collaboration may improve patient outcomes and workforce retention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This quality improvement study aimed to reduce nursing-initiated hospitalist requests by 25% across four pilot units by October 2023. From February to May 2023, 99 nurses completed 1 hour refresher training sessions to strengthen clinical decision-making, clarify scope within the IDT, and improve workflow efficiency. Pre-training and post-training surveys assessed nurses&rsquo; self-reported knowledge and comfort, and an implementation survey assessed perceived impacts on practice and collaboration. A retrospective electronic health record (EHR) chart review (September 2022&ndash;June 2024) evaluated total and declined hospitalist requests (outcome measures), focused nursing assessments (FNAs; process measures) and direct allied health requests (AHRs; balancing measures).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Pre-training and post-training surveys were completed by 69 and 72 nurses, respectively. Mean composite self-reported knowledge scores increased from 3.56 (SD 0.88) pre-training to 4.57 (SD 0.57) post-training (mean difference 1.02; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.26; p&lt;0.001). Implementation surveys indicated improved clinical practice, enhanced IDT collaboration, and strong endorsement of the training. However, nursing-initiated hospitalist requests (monthly mean=339.4) and declined requests (monthly mean=30.6; 9% decline rate) showed no sustained reduction. Common reasons for declined requests included completed assessments (18.8%), duplicate requests (18.8%), and redirected AHRs (13.0%). FNAs (monthly mean=91.77) and AHRs (monthly mean=14.3) remained stable.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Targeted nursing education improved nurses&rsquo; self-reported knowledge and IDT perceived collaboration but did not reduce hospitalist requests. Sustained impact may require ongoing education, integrated onboarding, EHR workflow enhancements, and clearer role definitions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de Lasa, C., Lam, E., Mesfin, E., Ramirez, A., Chambers, S., Tajirian, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T05:02:59-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003595</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003595</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Building capacity for integrated health care--nursing education initiatives in a Canadian mental health setting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003595</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003595</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003331?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reducing umbilical catheter migration rate by introducing regular POCUS assessment: a quality improvement project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003331?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Umbilical venous catheters (UVCs) provide essential vascular access for neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit, yet malpositioning and catheter migration can lead to serious complications.</p>
<p>We conducted a quality improvement project at Evelina London Children&rsquo;s Hospital, aiming to reduce UVC-related complications by introducing routine monitoring of UVC tip position after insertion using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS).</p>
<p>A retrospective review was carried out to establish a baseline for current UVC practice at a time when tip position was predominantly confirmed by X-ray. During this initial 6-month period, among 28 preterm infants born at less than 30 weeks&rsquo; gestation, UVC migration occurred in 57% of cases, with two instances of extravasation injury.</p>
<p>This was followed by an intervention period, which included a POCUS training programme for medical staff and the introduction of updated local guidelines recommending POCUS assessment of UVC tip position at insertion and routine follow-up between days 3 and 5 after insertion.</p>
<p>In a second 6-month period, we prospectively evaluated POCUS use and UVC migration rates among 28 preterm infants with characteristics comparable to the initial cohort.</p>
<p>Following the intervention, POCUS use at insertion increased significantly (82% vs 29%), with an improvement in correct UVC placement at insertion (75% vs 40%). At follow-up between days 3 and 5, UVC migration was still observed in 30% of cases.</p>
<p>When migration was detected, the UVC was either removed or repositioned if found within the right atrium. Importantly, no extravasation injuries occurred in the post-intervention group.</p>
<p>These findings suggest that POCUS can facilitate early detection of UVC migration and optimise initial line placement, with the potential to reduce severe complications. Routine POCUS monitoring is a practicable strategy to improve UVC management and improve the safety of neonatal care.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gallo, D., Maggioni, A., Dongre, S., Turnock, K., Milan, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-10T05:16:38-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003331</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003331</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reducing umbilical catheter migration rate by introducing regular POCUS assessment: a quality improvement project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003331</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003331</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003851?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Experiences of people from minoritised groups who report healthcare-related harm in the UK: a qualitative socioecological study exploring factors contributing to unsafe care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003851?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To capture the experiences of people from minoritised groups who self-report healthcare-related harm and their views on contributory factors to the harm.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>In-depth one-to-one qualitative interviews, analysed using inductive and deductive methods to explore and then organise factors participants associated with healthcare-related harm and map these factors onto a socioecological framework (SEF).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>People from minoritised groups in the United Kingdom (UK) self-reporting harm arising from the National Health Service (NHS), recruited from community groups, social media and a survey of the general public.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>48 participants currently minoritised in the UK based on one or more of faith, ethnicity, disability, sexual orientation or gender modality who have experienced harm in the NHS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Heterogeneous and interacting factors contribute to healthcare-related harms, spanning all five levels of the SEF: individual, interpersonal, community, organisational and societal. Multiple factors from powerlessness and low trust to unwelcoming NHS environments reinforce each other to increase risk of harm in minoritised populations. The SEF helped draw out less visible factors associated with the experience of unsafe care, including a health service designed around the needs of the majority population and societal attitudes to minoritised groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Multiple individual factors are already known drivers of disparities in safety among minoritised groups such as language barriers and cultural differences in beliefs. The SEF enabled an expanded view of contributory factors to harm in these groups, thereby providing a wider set of potential interventions to address safety inequities. A narrow focus on improving the quality of interpersonal, relational care is unlikely to have a significant impact on safety improvement in minoritised groups without addressing structural and institutionalised processes that drive discrimination and exclusion.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thana, L., Crocker, H., Modha, S., Mulcahy, L., Hickson, F., Pope, C., Vincent, C., Hogan, H., Peters, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T04:00:45-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003851</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003851</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Experiences of people from minoritised groups who report healthcare-related harm in the UK: a qualitative socioecological study exploring factors contributing to unsafe care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003851</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003851</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003925?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Technical error prevalence in the complete pathology tissue testing process: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003925?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To estimate the prevalence of technical errors in the total testing process of pathology tissue specimens.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A systematic review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology was performed. Extracted data were pooled using a random-effects model and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approaches.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Science Direct databases were searched on 29 May 2025 for eligible studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study selection</st>
<p>Peer-reviewed studies published after 2003 that reported technical error prevalence in any aspect of routine tissue collection and processing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The search returned 30 articles (31 studies), including data from 2 794 987 surgical pathology cases. Pooled effect sizes were calculated for pre-analytic errors at 16.71 per 1000 cases (95% CI 6.42 to 31.67), actively identified errors in the laboratory at 40.17 per 1000 (95% CI 7.04 to 97.61) and reported surgical pathology specimen errors at 4.94 per 1000 (95% CI 1.33 to 10.80). Subgroup analysis showed an occult error prevalence of 2.54 per 1000 cases (95% CI 1.63 to 3.64), and surgical pathology case contamination was 62.23 per 1000 (95% CI 8.22 to 159.33).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion and relevance</st>
<p>The analysis suggests that tissue processing technical errors are more prevalent than reported. A lack of standardised methods for defining and detecting errors contributes to undocumented and unidentified errors, leaving the true error prevalence unknown. The majority of clinical decisions are based on laboratory results; however, without reliable detection and reporting, errors in vulnerable processes risk compromising patient diagnoses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024600518.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katsma, A., Jorns, J. M., Gardner, P., Wolden, M., Leuther, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T04:00:45-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003925</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003925</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Technical error prevalence in the complete pathology tissue testing process: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003925</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003925</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003758?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[National improvement initiative operationalising a 7 Phase Whole System Approach Framework (WSA7) to improve the management of chronic pain and decrease high-risk opioid prescribing across integrated care systems in England]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003758?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Challenges in the management of chronic pain have resulted in concerning levels of high-risk opioid prescribing across England, highlighting the importance of personalised care and coordinated working across whole systems.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>Improve management of chronic pain by reducing chronic and high-dose opioid prescribing and increasing awareness and availability of biopsychosocial support.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methodology</st>
<p>Mobilising activity across the macro, meso and micro levels of the healthcare system in England, the initiative employed a novel 7 Phase Whole System Approach Framework (WSA7), enabling diverse stakeholders to coordinate improvement and learning activity to understand the local problems, coordinate change ideas and consider how to sustain improvement across the pathway of care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>Predefined national outcomes relating to opioid prescribing were achieved: There was a 5.13% decrease in the rate of chronic opioid prescribing vs baseline, equating to 56 403 fewer people prescribed chronic opioids than would have had the rate remained at baseline levels, preventing between 841 and 910 deaths. Decrease of 20.35% in rate of high-dose prescribing versus baseline, halving the risk of opioid-related death for 16 963 people. Increased availability and awareness of biopsychosocial support; at least 12 093 patients supported to self-manage their pain. 27 integrated care systems (ICSs) fully participated in the initiative, five partially. Successful implementation of the WSA7 (n=19 ICSs) achieved greater sustained improvement vs non-participating ICSs (n=10), ICSs with implementation failure (n=8) and partial implementation (n=5).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Employing the WSA7 created contextual conditions across ICSs that supported and sustained improvement in a complex problem that challenges health and care systems across England.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dales, R., Hamed, J., Fogarty, M., Jamieson, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-05T04:07:40-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003758</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003758</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[National improvement initiative operationalising a 7 Phase Whole System Approach Framework (WSA7) to improve the management of chronic pain and decrease high-risk opioid prescribing across integrated care systems in England]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003758</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003758</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003245?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identifying barriers to incident reporting in a quaternary care hospital]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003245?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>This study aimed to explore the barriers to incident reporting among healthcare professionals in a quaternary care hospital in South India.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methodology</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study was conducted from May to June 2023 among 1784 healthcare professionals selected using systematic random sampling. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, <sup>2</sup> tests and analysis of variance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 629 responded (35% response rate): 68 doctors (10%), 435 nurses (69%) and 126 allied health professionals (20%). Incident reporting was highest among allied health professionals (65%), followed by nurses (39%) and doctors (27%). However, nurses reported the highest absolute number of incidents (n=170). Types of incidents most frequently reported included medication related (n=92), patient safety (n=69) and patient care (n=42). The most common barriers were personal, particularly fear of punitive action (66% of allied health professionals, 36% of nurses and 15% of doctors), identity tracking concerns (56%, 40% and 38%, respectively) and perceived lack of anonymity. Differences in perceived barriers across groups were statistically significant (p&lt;0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Individual-level barriers&mdash;especially fear of punitive action and lack of anonymity&mdash;continue to limit reporting despite established systems. Leadership must foster a non-punitive, confidential culture and improve feedback. While simplifying processes and expanding training may enhance participation, these strategies remain untested at our institution, serving instead as guidance for future quality improvement efforts.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loganathan, A., Joseph, L., Rabindaranth, B. R., Rani, J., Ebenezer, J., Annamalai, P., Chacko, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-03T06:55:37-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003245</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003245</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identifying barriers to incident reporting in a quaternary care hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003245</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003245</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003842?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Qualitative exploration of service users and social prescribing link workers of the Armed Forces Community social prescribing scheme in Cornwall]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003842?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The Armed Forces Community (AFC) experience significant health inequalities and barriers to accessing support. Cornwall, England, has one of the highest AFC populations. A social prescribing service, delivered by Active Plus, was developed to improve physical and mental well-being and target wider determinants of health of this population. Uniquely, the service is delivered by social prescribing link workers who are themselves veterans.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This evaluation aimed to qualitatively explore the experiences of the service users and the social prescribing link workers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Semistructured interviews of five service users and four social prescribing link workers were conducted online using Google Meet. Service users were sampled to reflect diversity in service branch, age and time since leaving the Armed Forces. Informed consent processes were carried out. Data were transcribed, checked, anonymised and inductively thematically analysed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Service users had struggled to transition from a military to a civilian identity. Referrals were for mental health, social isolation, housing, finances, physical health and domestic abuse. Having a social prescribing link worker who was a veteran was a crucial component of establishing trust, without the need to explain military culture or experiences. This was instrumental in helping service users engage more fully with the service offered. Service users reported improvements in their living conditions and mental health, were more connected to other people and had a renewed sense of hope and optimism.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This is the first report of experiences of the AFC receiving bespoke social prescribing support. The findings highlight the crucial nature of designing the social prescribing service to resonate with military culture and the difficulties of transitioning to a civilian identity. Service users had improved well-being and were supported with a range of determinants of health. Further research needs to be carried out on other AFC members to confirm the findings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Polley, M. J., Tytherleigh, M., Seers, H. E., Kent, C., Sharpe, R. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-03T06:55:37-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003842</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003842</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Qualitative exploration of service users and social prescribing link workers of the Armed Forces Community social prescribing scheme in Cornwall]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003842</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003842</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003612?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) to increase timeliness of recovery after cardiac surgery: a quality improvement project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003612?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the backlog of elective surgeries across the National Health Service (NHS). This is particularly critical for patients awaiting cardiac surgery, where even short delays can lead to disease progression and increased risk of complications. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programmes aim to optimise recovery and reduce length of stay, yet their implementation in cardiac surgery remains inconsistent. This quality improvement project sought to improve the implementation of postoperative ERAS principles to increase the timeliness of recovery and enhance intensive care unit (ICU) capacity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Time-directed ERAS goals were developed, and a phased educational intervention was implemented through four Plan&ndash;Do&ndash;Study&ndash;Act cycles: (1) introductory teaching and baseline data collection, (2) development of a tool within the electronic patient record to promote real-time implementation of ERAS goals and enable continuous performance monitoring, (3) introduction of an e-learning module and (4) targeted educational interventions. Outcome measures included time to achieve ERAS goals and the proportion of postoperative patients clinically ready for discharge to the ward within 24 and 48 hours. Balancing measures included reintubation and ICU readmission rates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Implementation of the phased educational intervention led to a sustained reduction in the time required to achieve ERAS goals. The proportion of patients clinically ready for discharge to the ward within 24 and 48 hours increased by 15.6% and 18.0%, respectively, exceeding the project&rsquo;s 5% target. No increase in reintubation or ICU readmission rates was observed, indicating that improvements were achieved safely.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Implementing time-directed ERAS goals through a phased educational intervention increased the timeliness of post-operative recovery after cardiac surgery. This approach has the potential to improve patient flow, enhance ICU capacity and support wider efforts to address elective cardiac surgery backlogs across the NHS.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Menon, A. A., Mudannayake, R., Bland, J., Gerrard, C., Petty, M., Jones, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-02T07:02:53-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003612</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003612</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) to increase timeliness of recovery after cardiac surgery: a quality improvement project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003612</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003612</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003648?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of adding a medical intern to the emergency department night shift]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003648?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate whether adding a fourth physician to the emergency department night shift would improve metrics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This retrospective cohort study used data from the Meir Medical Centre emergency department, 1 January 2021 to 31 May 2023. The study period included adding a fourth physician to the night shift staff in September 2021. Primary and secondary outcomes were time from patient entrance to doctor&rsquo;s examination, time to decision about hospitalisation or discharge and rates of hospitalisation, 1 day hospitalisation and returning patients. Secondary analysis examined the mean and lowest seniority of the staff, and the mean number of patients examined by a physician during night shifts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>After increasing staff, hospitalisation rates decreased minimally from 44% to 42% (p=0.03), whereas 1 day hospitalisation rates increased from 26% to 28% (p=0.006). Paradoxically, time to disposition increased slightly from 4.5 to 4.7 hours (p&lt;0.001). No significant changes were noted in return visit rates or time to first physician encounter.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The study did not result in significant impacts on key performance indicators after adding a physician to night shift staffing. Our findings suggest that increasing physician numbers did not significantly improve overall emergency department efficiency. The only benefit observed was a decrease in the number of patients per physician, potentially alleviating individual physician workload.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Adding a physician to the emergency department night shift staff did not result in significant improvements in work efficiency, as measured by the parameters assessed in this study.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glass-Biran, A. H., Eyre, A., Stein, G., Chen, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-02T07:02:53-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003648</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003648</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of adding a medical intern to the emergency department night shift]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003648</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003648</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003387?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Validation and benchmarking of Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREM) tool for the safety of patients undergoing MRI investigations]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003387?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>MRI uses a magnetic field that can harm patients with metallic implants and eliciting details about implants while entering MRI room is essential. Patient-Reported Experience Measure (PREM) tool takes feedback from patients and checks whether staff have enquired about safety parameters while undergoing the diagnostic test, thereby safeguarding the patients against any potential hazards. Objective of study to develop a context-specific PREM tool for MRI safety through constructive feedback from patients</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methodology</st>
<p>Phase 1 expert group was formed and focused group discussions (FGDs) conducted to develop a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) and the PREM Questionnaire tool. Phase 2 and phase 3, multiphasic study conducted in 15 hospitals, India with good geographical distribution using purposive sampling. Phase 2 consisted of a pilot study using the PREM tool with a sample size of 213 participants, and phase 3 consisted of a field study with 720 participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>PREM tool developed with 21 questions based on SOP, findings of FGDs and patient feedback. The internal consistency of the PREM tool was excellent and indicated high reliability and showed that the expert group considered the questions essential. Concerning removing metallic devices before the scan, 100% of participants said yes in the pilot study and 99% in the main study. Lacunae identified in the study included screening using a metal detector, counselling about history of allergy, side effects of contrast agents and claustrophobia, and methods to contact the staff in case of any emergency during the MRI scan. These findings indicate that there is a need to improve safety practices based on feedback from patients using the MRI Safety PREM tool.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>MRI Safety PREM tool was developed and validated as a zero-cost patient safety tool. Study participants accepted the PREM questionnaire as a vital tool for patients undergoing MRI to ensure patient safety and improved quality of care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pillai, J. S. K., Joseph, L., Sahoo, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-30T02:04:39-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003387</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003387</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Validation and benchmarking of Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREM) tool for the safety of patients undergoing MRI investigations]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003387</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003387</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003715?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reducing delays in time-critical medications for Parkinsons disease: a multifaceted, multiprofessional quality improvement project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003715?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>When people with Parkinson&rsquo;s disease (PD) are admitted to hospital, control of their symptoms can deteriorate, often due to delayed or incorrect medication administration. The aim of this project was to improve the administration of PD medicines for hospital in-patients in our trust. Specifically, we aimed to administer 95% of PD medicines within 30 minutes of the prescribed time and to eliminate delays of &gt;60 minutes for PD medications.</p>
<p>To achieve these aims, we developed a multifaceted quality improvement project, led by a multidisciplinary team, that ran over a period of 2 years. The outcome measure in this project was the time delay between the time a given PD medicine was scheduled to be administered and the time at which it was recorded as having been administered by nursing staff.</p>
<p>The data were divided into 3 phases: a 6-month baseline phase (March 2022 to September 2022), a 24-month project phase (September 2022 to September 2024) and a 6-month sustain phase (September 2024 to March 2025). Statistical process control (SPC) charts were used to monitor medicine delays over time. Plan-do-study-act methodology was adopted within this project and a variety of interventions were employed throughout the project.</p>
<p>The project demonstrated a significant reduction in delays in medicines administration for patients with PD. The success of our project came from the cultivation of multiprofessional &lsquo;ownership&rsquo; of the problem, in combination with an appreciation of the patient&rsquo;s lived experience, through visualisation of how poor symptom control can impact on a person&rsquo;s ability to move. Whilst it is not possible to comment on the long-term sustainability of the project, we were encouraged that the changes were maintained throughout the 6-month sustain phase for both medicine administration targets.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fisher, J., Scott, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-30T02:04:39-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003715</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003715</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reducing delays in time-critical medications for Parkinsons disease: a multifaceted, multiprofessional quality improvement project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003715</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003715</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003489?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phased implementation of surgical safety care bundle in a multispecialty, tertiary care teaching hospital: a quality improvement project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003489?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>&lsquo;Safe surgery saves lives&rsquo; initiative by the WHO consists of measures focussed on improving surgical safety. Healthcare institutions across the globe are encouraged to identify the lacunae in surgical safety and adopt these initiatives to suit the local practices and traditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A few never events and near misses prompted our institution to create a surgical care safety bundle to improve perioperative patient safety. The surgical care bundle focused on improving the usage of surgical safety checklist (SSCL), surgical consents, surgical site marking (SSM) and sponge count in a phased manner. Baseline audits were conducted for each of the above components at different time points and measures were introduced to improve compliance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The baseline usage of SSCL in 2010 was 65% that improved to 70% in 2014, 86% in 2016 and 97% in 2019. The availability of general surgical consents improved from 56% in 2010 to 70% in 2015. With the introduction of specialised surgical consents in 2019, the compliance improved significantly to 99%. SSM was added to the project in 2017, improved from baseline 74% to 95% in 2019 and continues to remain above 90%. Sponge count documentation has been below 80% in 2010 and was implemented as a part of the safe surgery protocol in 2019 after which compliance significantly improved and stayed above 90%. Good compliance with the usage of checklists and improved the safety culture was demonstrated by increased reporting of near miss events. Never events have not occurred after introduction of all components of surgical safety in 2019.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Phased implementation of surgical care safety bundles, audits and reaudits, repeated educational measures and a slow yet steady process of interventions has markedly improved the safety culture and surgical safety in a larger teaching hospital of a developing country.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joselyn, A. S., Joseph, L., Loganathan, A., Ebenezer, J., Abraham, S., Ranjan, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:20:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003489</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003489</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phased implementation of surgical safety care bundle in a multispecialty, tertiary care teaching hospital: a quality improvement project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003489</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003489</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003727?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Implementing quality improvement in vascular services: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003727?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The Peripheral Arterial Disease Quality Improvement Programme (PAD QIP) was a quality improvement (QI) collaborative between 11 English vascular surgery centres from May 2020 to May 2022, aiming to expedite treatment for PAD. This qualitative study explored beliefs about the PAD QIP and barriers and facilitators to implementation of changes in vascular surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Sixteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinicians from the vascular centres that participated in the PAD QIP and were analysed using framework analysis, based on the five broad domains within the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Five themes captured the main factors that affected the implementation of changes in the pathway of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia: the programme, the benefit for patients, the role of the team, the resources and organisational processes, and the polarising effect of COVID-19. Regarding the programme, participants stated that the concrete timeframes, external performance monitoring, peer comparison and the programme&rsquo;s national reach helped them obtain resources to implement changes. Learning from and sharing experiences with others was also useful. Accurate performance data were considered essential for leveraging resources, but data entry was onerous and required dedicated staff. The view that the programme was beneficial for patients, the support of a team of healthcare professionals and organisational support in the form of resources were important requirements for implementation, while the COVID-19 pandemic also played a crucial role as a contextual factor beyond the control of the participants. The main factors that differed between high-implementation and low-implementation centres were team beliefs, team structure, team compatibility, networks/communication, resources, implementation climate, relative priority and evidence strength.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This QI collaborative facilitated the implementation of changes according to participants, while team and organisational support was crucial.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Birmpili, P., Atkins, E., Boyle, J. R., Chetter, I., Cromwell, D. A., Glidewell, L., Sheard, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:20:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003727</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003727</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Implementing quality improvement in vascular services: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003727</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003727</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003760?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cultural transformation beyond checklists for patient safety: a longitudinal evaluation of safety interventions in critical care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003760?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Implementing structured safety interventions in intensive care units (ICUs) remains challenging due to patient complexity, staff turnover and dynamic workflows. This study evaluates the longitudinal impact of a multidisciplinary safety improvement programme in a high-acuity ICU.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A 2-year prospective evaluation was conducted in a 12-bed academic ICU in Milan, Italy. The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture was administered to all ICU professionals (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists) in December 2022 and repeated in December 2024. Interventions included staff training, enhanced event reporting systems, regular morbidity and mortality conferences and a multidisciplinary safety team. Responses were analysed descriptively, including subgroup analysis by professional category and staff turnover.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 86 staff completed the 2022 survey, and 66 completed the 2024 survey, with 56 participating in both. Over the 2 years, perceptions of teamwork (68%&ndash;81%), communication openness (47%&ndash;60%) and comfort in reporting errors (38%&ndash;55%) showed substantial improvement. The proportion of staff who perceived management support for safety increased from 70%&ndash;80%. Staff hired after 2022 reported more favourable safety perceptions than continuing staff, particularly in communication and reporting domains.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Structured, multidisciplinary interventions led to measurable improvements in ICU safety culture. However, persistent interprofessional differences and under-reporting of adverse events highlight the need for targeted strategies. Safety culture transformation requires sustained leadership, continuous onboarding and system-focused feedback mechanisms to ensure long-term impact.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caccioppola, A., Villa, L., Zainaghi, I., Brioni, M., Rossi, V., Privitera, E., Properzi, P., Leoni, S., Roselli, P., Cislaghi, A., Adamini, I., Grasselli, G., Panigada, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:20:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003760</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003760</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cultural transformation beyond checklists for patient safety: a longitudinal evaluation of safety interventions in critical care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003760</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003760</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003853?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[From observation to action: a qualitative interview study of factors that influence the reporting of observations of unprofessional conduct in healthcare settings]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003853?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Unprofessional behaviour in healthcare settings can undermine patient safety, erode team morale, and if not addressed, negatively impact organisational culture. Healthcare organisations rely on the voluntary reporting of such behaviours to identify and address these issues. Understanding the factors that influence reporting decisions is essential for pursuing and sustaining a culture of safety and respect.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore the motivations, experiences and attitudes of healthcare professionals who report incidents of perceived unprofessional behaviour through an organisational event reporting system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A qualitative study was conducted involving semistructured interviews with 50 healthcare professionals who had submitted reports of unprofessional behaviour at the study site. Thematic analysis was used to identify recurring themes related to the reporters&rsquo; motivations, reservations, knowledge of the reporting process and considerations for direct communication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Participants reported being motivated to report primarily by concerns about coworker mistreatment (52%) and patient safety (38%). While most participants (68%) expressed no reservations about reporting, some raised concerns about potential retaliation (32%). Most participants (82%) demonstrated an understanding of the reporting process, and over half (56%) indicated they had attempted to address the issue directly with the colleague involved before submitting a formal report.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Healthcare professionals are motivated to report unprofessional behaviour primarily out of concern for their colleagues and patient safety. Addressing fears of retaliation and promoting transparent reporting processes are essential for fostering a culture of safety and encouraging the reporting of unprofessional conduct. Findings suggest that organisations should continue to emphasise both formal reporting systems and training for direct communication to address unprofessional behaviour effectively.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Webb, L. E., Hickson, G. B., Troyer, M., Martinez, W., Kostiw, N. M., Cooper, W. O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:20:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003853</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003853</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[From observation to action: a qualitative interview study of factors that influence the reporting of observations of unprofessional conduct in healthcare settings]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003853</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003853</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003465?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Food on demand delivery service: from hospitality to hospital - trialling a proof of concept in a specialist childrens hospital]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003465?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Hospital food influences experiences and outcomes of care, and optimising nutrition for hospitalised children is universally recognised as important for recovery. While several barriers to oral food intake have been identified, interventions to address them are limited. Our aim was to implement and evaluate a proof-of-concept (PoC) trial of a Food on Demand Delivery Service app in a specialist paediatric hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>PoC trial and evaluation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Specialist children&rsquo;s hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>101 families completed baseline measures; 26 families completed measures during the PoC trial, 18 parents and 11 ward-based staff participated in interviews, and four ward-based staff and four catering staff took part in focus groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>Following adaptations to an existing web-based Food on Demand Delivery Service app, a PoC trial was undertaken on six inpatient wards during a 4-week period. Data were collected before and following implementation, using quantitative (surveys) and qualitative (focus groups and individual interviews) approaches.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The Food on Demand Delivery Service was positively evaluated by all stakeholder groups. Challenges were identified, particularly by catering staff in relation to communication and logistics, but overall findings supported upscaling to a hospital-wide roll-out.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The Food on Demand Delivery Service offers potential for addressing barriers to oral intake for hospitalised children. Challenges will need to be addressed prior to scaling up the project for a hospital-wide roll-out, and several recommendations came from the trial. However, the benefits for children, families and staff were evident and supported further work to enable the Food on Demand Delivery Service to be introduced across the hospital.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wray, J., Bexson, C., Keyser, R., Gough, P., Rothman, B., Oldham, G., Taylor, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-22T04:46:59-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003465</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003465</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Food on demand delivery service: from hospitality to hospital - trialling a proof of concept in a specialist childrens hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003465</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003465</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003812?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quality improvement for self-management: the DIALOG+QI framework]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003812?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <sec id="s1"><st>Introduction</st><sec id="s1-1"><st>&lsquo;They cannot argue with what they see&rsquo;</st> <p>For 20 years, LA tried to be heard. She repeatedly told healthcare professionals that something specific was wrong, that her diagnosis did not fit her lived experience and that she needed different help. Instead, she was told she was not accepting her diagnosis. The consequences were devastating: 3 years in secure hospital settings costing the NHS thousands of pounds, suicide attempts requiring intensive care, friends being told to consider turning off her life support. "Had I been listened to 20 years earlier," she reflects, "I wouldn&rsquo;t have had the last 20 years robbed from me. It almost cost me my life."</p> <p>The breakthrough came through an unexpected route. While involved in People Participation at East London NHS Foundation Trust, LA attended an introductory quality improvement (QI) session. The basic tools&mdash;driver diagrams, baseline measurement and run charts&mdash;sparked a realisation: "If we...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Delgado, P., Santos, C., Adley, L., Shah, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-22T04:46:59-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003812</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003812</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quality improvement for self-management: the DIALOG+QI framework]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003812</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003812</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003291?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Role of real-world evidence from patient registries for psoriasis in decision-making: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003291?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis typically requires the use of multiple systemic therapies over a patient&rsquo;s lifetime. The efficacy and safety of systemic treatments are typically evaluated in clinical trials; however, patient registries are increasingly used to monitor long-term outcomes of systemic therapies for psoriasis in real-world settings. Psoriasis registries also generate important real-world evidence about psoriasis treatment that may facilitate a greater understanding of outcomes outside of a controlled clinical trial setting. This study thus characterises the design and measures used in real-world studies of psoriasis treatment from patient registries and assesses its use in informing clinical guidelines and reimbursement decisions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A systematic literature review was conducted to identify real-world observational studies that used psoriasis registry data. PubMed and Embase were searched for English-language studies published between January 2018 and January 2023. To assess how real-world studies, clinical guidelines, and reimbursement and coverage reports have informed practice, treatment, and reimbursement guidelines, a narrative review of recommendations was conducted. All results were screened by two independent reviewers (LP and TAS) using prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Outcomes of interest were extracted into Excel, with all conflicts resolved through discussion/consensus. Tables displayed outcomes and research topics first by year, then by registry.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42023402431</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Passero, L., Simon, T. A., Zhong, Y., Zhuo, J., Varga, S., Armstrong, A. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-12T06:09:04-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003291</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003291</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Role of real-world evidence from patient registries for psoriasis in decision-making: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003291</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003291</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003666?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring music preferences, behaviours and experiences of exercising to music in pulmonary rehabilitation for individuals with chronic respiratory diseases: a cross-sectional survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003666?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Music can enhance exercise performance, but its potential has not been well explored in pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). The aim was to explore the current music-related behaviours among PR service users with chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) to inform future PR service interventions and explore the potential for music to facilitate exercise adherence in this context.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The cross-sectional survey was distributed among PR attendees at the University Hospitals of Leicester (UHL) NHS Trust in the United Kingdom, between November 2023 and August 2024. Participants completed a 25-item survey exploring (i) relevant technology ownership and music-related behaviours, (ii) preferred music genres and songs and (iii) anticipated benefits/concerns of exercising to music. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Free-text data were analysed using qualitative counting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We surveyed 109 people living with CRDs (51% male, 56% aged &ge;70 year, 76% chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 82% owned a smartphone). More than half had no prior experience of exercising to music (n=59, 54%). Despite this, almost half of participants listened to music at least once/day (n=54, 49%), primarily via the radio (n=83, 76%) and/or online music platforms (n=76, 70%). Pop (n=39, 36%) and Country (n=38, 35%) were the most popular music genres listened to, with the majority listening to music without headphones (n=64, 59%). The main concern about wearing headphones while exercising was that it might reduce their awareness of the surroundings (n=67, 61%). The perceived benefits of listening to music during exercise were to boost their mood (n=39, 36%) or help maintain their walking pace (n=19, 17%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>There is potential to use music as a tool to support exercise in PR. However, lack of prior experience exercising to music, diverse music preferences, safety considerations and the need to increase knowledge of the potential benefits of exercising to music are key challenges. These findings may help future PR services to implement music into their programmes and develop personalised music-based interventions to optimise exercise performance.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alhothaly, O. A., Houchen-Wolloff, L., Ward, S., Chaplin, E., Zatloukal, J., Dunlop, M., Singh, S. J., Orme, M. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-12T06:09:04-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003666</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003666</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring music preferences, behaviours and experiences of exercising to music in pulmonary rehabilitation for individuals with chronic respiratory diseases: a cross-sectional survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003666</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003666</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003497?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quality improvement project to improve blood culture volumes in haematology patients]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003497?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Sepsis resulting from bloodstream infection is a medical emergency, especially in immunocompromised haematology patients. Identification of causative pathogens through blood cultures is crucial for delivering effective antibiotics promptly.</p>
<p>Adequate blood culture volumes (BCV) are crucial for detecting bloodstream infections. Guidelines recommend 8&ndash;10 mL per blood culture bottle, yet achieving these volumes remains challenging. In our haematology wards, baseline mean BCV was suboptimal at 4.5 mL. This quality improvement project aimed to optimise BCVs to recommended levels within 6 months at a Singapore tertiary hospital&rsquo;s Department of Haematology.</p>
<p>We implemented a multistakeholder quality improvement across three haematology wards from January 2023 to January 2025. Three Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were executed from July 2024: (1) staff education and stakeholder engagement, (2) equipment and process enhancement and (3) validation of BCV measurements through comparison of an automated BCV measurement system (BD EpiCenter BACTEC Microbiology Data Management System) against manual bottle weighing.</p>
<p>Postintervention data demonstrated clear statistical signals of improvements in BCV through both EpiCenter automated system and manual bottle weighing. Manual validation in selected wards demonstrated achievement of target volumes. Importantly, this validation process revealed potential limitations of automated measurement systems in our specialised clinical setting. Overall, our results demonstrate that a well-coordinated, multidisciplinary approach combining staff education and engagement, improved equipment and BCV measurement process can successfully achieve recommended BCV in our complex haematology settings.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yuen Yue Candice, C., Ee, T. Y., Ning, T., Dorothy, N. H. L., Anson, W. H. M., Yvonne, C. F. Z., Jean, S. X. Y., Anne, C. M., Kyaw Isabella, K. M. N., Piotr, C. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-09T05:17:06-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003497</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003497</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quality improvement project to improve blood culture volumes in haematology patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003497</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003497</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003556?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Early extubation in low-risk liver transplant recipients: a quality improvement project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003556?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Increasing evidence supports early extubation in liver transplant (LT) recipients and the early recovery after surgery for LT guideline strongly recommends considering early extubation. Usual care at our institution involves admitting all LT recipients to the intensive care unit (ICU), sedated, mechanically ventilated and extubated during daytime hours. This quality improvement project aimed to identify and extubate suitable LT recipients within 4 hours postoperatively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Baseline data were collected from all LT recipients between October 2018 and September 2020, the control group. An early extubation pathway was implemented in October 2020, and prospective data were collected from October 2020 to September 2022 and used as the intervention group. Primary outcome was extubation within 4 hours after LT. Secondary outcomes included the duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay (LOS) and hospital LOS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main results</st>
<p>During the study period, 342 LT procedures were performed, of which 339 patients were included in the study. Of LT recipients who met criteria for early extubation, the rate of extubation within 4 hours postoperatively increased from 23% (14/60) in the control group to 65% (62/96) in the intervention group (p&lt;0.001). In adjusted models, the pathway was associated with an increased proportion of patients extubated within 4 hours (OR=6.74, 95% CI 3.04 to 14.92, p&lt;0.001) and reduction in duration of mechanical ventilation (HR=1.95, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.79, p&lt;0.001), ICU LOS (HR=1.42, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.99, p=0.04) and hospital LOS (HR=1.60, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.26, p=0.007).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>An early extubation pathway for LT recipients reduced duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU LOS and hospital LOS.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kidson, K. M., LeBlanc, A., Moore, S., Chiu, A., Chartier-Plante, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T19:51:26-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003556</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003556</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Early extubation in low-risk liver transplant recipients: a quality improvement project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003556</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003556</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003891?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[From lines to lifelines: a quality improvement study to reduce CLABSI at a level III NICU in LMIC]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003891?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality among neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Point-of-care quality improvement (POCQI) methods can reduce the rate of CLABSI by improving compliance with the care bundle.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A quality improvement study comprising three phases was planned in the NICU of a tertiary care hospital in western India to assess the impact of the central line care bundle. Baseline data were collected for 8 weeks to find the incidence of CLABSI. An aim statement was made and a team formed. A root cause analysis was conducted to identify the factors contributing to the high rate of CLABSI. Various changed ideas were tested in plan&ndash;do&ndash;study&ndash;act cycles and monitored with process indicators. Ideas were adopted or adapted based on their impact. Compliance with insertion and maintenance bundles was used as a process indicator, while the CLABSI rate served as an outcome indicator.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>CLABSI rate reduced from 66/1000 catheter days (May 2023) to 18/1000 catheter days (95% CI 0.14 to 0.79; p value 0.012) during the study. Insertion bundle compliance increased to 85% during the intervention phase and 70% during the sustainability phase. Maintenance bundle compliance was 45% and 35% during the intervention and sustainability phases, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>POCQI methods can help increase bundle care compliance in the NICU and reduce CLABSI rates in low- and middle-income country settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Biswas, J., Joshi, A., Londhe, A. C., Deshmukh, L., Tanpure, S., Iravane, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T19:51:26-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003891</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003891</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[From lines to lifelines: a quality improvement study to reduce CLABSI at a level III NICU in LMIC]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003891</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003891</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003311?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Enhancing adherence to guideline-directed use of anticoagulant therapy in atrial fibrillation: a triad of quality improvement interventions in an academic outpatient setting]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003311?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Anticoagulation for stroke prevention is often recommended for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), yet many eligible patients do not receive guideline-concordant anticoagulation. Prior quality improvement (QI) initiatives to improve anticoagulation in AF have had mixed results.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Preventing Preventable Strokes: Scalability used a triad of interventions to increase the number of eligible patients with AF receiving guideline-concordant anticoagulation, including (1) a best practice alert integrated with the electronic health record, (2) clinician education and (3) patient communication about the anticoagulation therapy that encouraged shared decision-making with clinicians. These interventions were conducted in primary care and cardiology outpatient clinics at (University of Florida Health). Patient-level data were collected during a 6-month intervention period and compared with a 6-month historical control period. Generalised estimating equations with a logistic link were used to estimate the odds of anticoagulant use, adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 3274 individuals were included during the intervention period and 3200 during the preintervention period. The average anticoagulation rate increased from 75.7% to 79.2% across the two periods. In the fully adjusted model, patients in the intervention period had significantly higher odds of anticoagulant use compared with the preintervention period (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.13, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.21, p=0.0007). MyChart activation (aOR 1.38, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.61, p&lt;0.0001) was also associated with increased anticoagulant use. Older age and higher CHA<SUB>2</SUB>DS<SUB>2</SUB>-VASc scores were associated with greater odds of anticoagulant use, while higher HAS-BLED scores and care in primary care (rather than cardiology) were associated with lower odds.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A triad of QI interventions at the practice, clinician and patient levels increased guideline-concordant anticoagulation use among patients with AF in half of the primary care and cardiology clinics in the University of Florida Health system.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xiang, K., Ndai, A. M., Reise, R., Rosenberg, E. I., Catanzaro, J. N., Smith, A. M., Moore, M., Singer, T., Tamas, M., Jackson, M., Dietrich, E., Conti, J., Dewar, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-05T23:12:08-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003311</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003311</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Enhancing adherence to guideline-directed use of anticoagulant therapy in atrial fibrillation: a triad of quality improvement interventions in an academic outpatient setting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003311</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003311</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003705?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Deprescribing benzodiazepines across different healthcare settings: a quality improvement initiative]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003705?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Due to growing awareness of risks associated with benzodiazepine (BZD) use, these medications are now considered potentially inappropriate for older adults. Despite this, older adults are more likely to receive these medications than younger adults, with those in long-term care (LTC) being particularly vulnerable, emphasising the importance of reducing BZD prescriptions. Other studies have shown success in reducing BZD prescriptions using a patient-focused multicomponent intervention: however, this approach has not been well studied in LTC.</p>
<p>During a seventeen-month quality improvement (QI) initiative conducted in an Edmonton LTC facility, a patient-focused multicomponent intervention (pharmacist-led medication review, counselling, patient and staff education, and new patient information resources) was implemented to reduce BZD prescriptions by 50%. Outcome measures included changes in BZD prescriptions and patients&rsquo; usage of BZDs, including dose and dosing frequency. Process measures included intervention component delivery, while balancing measures included financial cost, number of falls and additional medication usage.</p>
<p>Numerous unforeseen complications arose, related to the facility and participant recruitment, which required several study adaptations. Ultimately, our goal sample size was not reached. All 10 recruited participants underwent the intervention, resulting in several individuals having their BZDs deprescribed. Although all participants received printed patient information material, few were formally educated. However, two staff education sessions were conducted, which were well attended and received. No complications ensued, and financial costs were minimal.</p>
<p>While our QI initiative reduced BZD usage, implementation challenges and a smaller than predicted sample size likely impacted the results obtained. Staff education was well received, suggesting further education is needed. The challenges encountered require subsequent cycles to fully assess the intervention&rsquo;s effectiveness and sustainability, including a more comprehensive assessment of the context, enablers and barriers. By sharing our experience, we hope to optimise the success of future research initiatives, as these challenges are common within research.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carr, F., Gruneir, A., Chow, J., Triscott, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-05T23:12:08-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003705</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003705</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Deprescribing benzodiazepines across different healthcare settings: a quality improvement initiative]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003705</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003705</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003689?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving resident doctor referrals to specialties: a 5-year evaluation of a centralised referrals sheet]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/1/e003689?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Referrals are a fundamental part of working life for a resident doctor, where an efficient system is needed when liaising with different specialties. Within a secondary care district general hospital, a lack of standardised protocols was recognised, which can lead to delays in patient care. The aim of this project was to improve knowledge and confidence among resident doctors when referring to specialties. A baseline study highlighted a lack of confidence among resident doctors, often relying on other colleagues when referring to each specialty. Our team created a comprehensive referrals sheet, through a series of plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles across a 5-year period, from 2019 to 2024. This referrals sheet described routine, urgent and out-of-hours referrals pathways for each specialty and was uploaded to the hospital&rsquo;s intranet for centralised access. This was then re-evaluated to assess the short-term and long-term impact of this intervention. This project resulted in a widespread improvement of doctors&rsquo; knowledge of referrals within the hospital, with an average confidence of inpatient referral from 49.0% to 74.4%, and outpatient referral from 28.0% to 57.0%. This study not only solidifies the referrals sheet as a useful and sustainable resource, but highlights the importance of PDSA cycles and direct improvements in clinical workflow. Future directions could aim at referrals being integrated with hospital software, as some specialties have begun to do.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yim, S., Williams, S. C., Ahmed, N., Byravan, R., Htwe, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-03T22:48:14-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003689</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003689</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving resident doctor referrals to specialties: a 5-year evaluation of a centralised referrals sheet]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003689</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003689</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A25?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[43 Maximizing resources: predictive modeling meets the model for improvement]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A25?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Predictive models in healthcare use historical data to forecast future trends and events for patients and hospitals. Integrating predictive models with healthcare improvement methodology has great potential to focus change concepts on patients most at risk of a particular outcome. This targeted approach can lead to improvement in outcomes while simultaneously efficiently utilizing resources, as interventions are tested on and applied only to the patients most likely to benefit from them.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>The primary objective was to detail how two quality improvement (QI) projects leveraged predictive models to efficiently drive outcomes using the IHI Model for Improvement. Secondary objectives included describing how predictive modeling identifies high-risk patients and informs targeted interventions and demonstrating examples of both clinical and operational improvements achieved.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The two detailed quality improvement projects utilized the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) Model for Improvement. In both cases, predictive models were applied to identify and target high-risk patient populations.</p><p>&middot; Clinical Improvement: One project targeted orthopedic trauma patients. Interventions included evidence based chemoprophylaxis (Lovenox) and early continuous daily physical and occupational therapy (PT/OT) (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>). Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were used, specifically testing early PT/OT in all patients versus testing it only in high-risk patients (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>). The outcome measured was the rate of perioperative pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT), also known as Patient Safety Indicator 12 (PSI 12).</p><p>&middot; Operational Improvement: The second project focused on reducing same-day case cancellations for patients having elective ear, nose, throat (ENT) surgery. This improvement utilized a Preoperative Evaluation Triage System. This system incorporated a Machine-Learning American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) Score and Patient Questionnaire to determine if an Anesthesia televisit was indicated (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F4">figure 4</cross-ref>).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The project targeting orthopedic trauma patients resulted in a 50% reduction in perioperative pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis (PE/DVT). The rate, measured by PSI 12, was reduced from a baseline of 5.2 to 2.6 (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F3">figure 3</cross-ref>). For the project focused on elective ENT surgery achieved a 13% reduction in same-day case cancellations. Furthermore, the preoperative evaluation triage system reduced unnecessary primary care physician (PCP) Preoperative Visits from 12% to 4% (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F5">figure 5</cross-ref>), thereby increasing access for other patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Integrating predictive models with the IHI Model for Improvement is a successful strategy to efficiently drive outcomes. This approach demonstrates effectiveness in achieving both clinical improvements (PE/DVT reduction) and operational efficiencies (cancellation reduction). Crucially, by applying interventions only to those patients most likely to benefit, the integration of predictive modeling facilitates the conservation of resources.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 43 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Intervention for high-risk patients</p></caption><link locator="43_F1"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 43 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Physical and occupational therapy run chart</p></caption><link locator="43_F2"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F3"><no>Abstract 43 Figure 3</no><caption><p>Outcome measure-PE/DVT rate</p></caption><link locator="43_F3"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F4"><no>Abstract 43 Figure 4</no><caption><p>Preoperative evaluation triage system</p></caption><link locator="43_F4"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F5"><no>Abstract 43 Figure 5</no><caption><p>Otorhinolaryngology (ORL) cancellation rate</p></caption><link locator="43_F5"></fig></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wnorowski, M., Tam, C., Andrews, E., Wongtangman, K., Ganz-Lord, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.43</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.43</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[43 Maximizing resources: predictive modeling meets the model for improvement]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A25</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A27</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A27?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[44 Early physical therapy intervention and return-to-work outcomes in work-related acute low back pain: a retrospective quantitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A27?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability globally and the second most common reason for medical consultations in the United States. Approximately 80% of adults experience LBP during their lifetime. Work-related back injuries affect nearly 2% of the U.S. workforce daily, with nurse assistants comprising over 52% of these cases. Notably, 85% of LBP cases are classified as non-specific, contributing to an estimated annual economic burden of $100 billion.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>This retrospective, quantitative, exploratory study evaluated the impact of early physical therapy (PT) initiation on return-to-work (RTW) times among employed adults with work-related acute LBP.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A total of 67 participants (<cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>) were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n = 22) received PT within 24 hours of injury, while Group 2 (n = 45) experienced delayed PT initiation. RTW times were compared using ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U tests.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Although statistical significance was not achieved (p = 0.175), descriptive analysis revealed that Group 1 returned to work in a mean of 16.2 days (SD = 17.9; range: 1&ndash;73), compared to 20.1 days (SD = 17.1; range: 1&ndash;77) in Group 2&mdash;a difference of 3.9 days (<cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T2">table 2</cross-ref>). Across age and gender subgroups, early PT was associated with a 2.7 to 10-day reduction in RTW time (<cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T3">table 3</cross-ref>). The average number of PT sessions required to achieve pre-injury functional goals was similar between groups (4.29&ndash;4.86 sessions), with a median of 4 sessions in both (<cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T4">table 4</cross-ref>).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>While not statistically significant, early initiation of PT within 24 hours of work-related acute LBP may offer clinically meaningful reductions in disability duration and facilitate earlier RTW. These findings support the potential value of incorporating early PT into occupational health protocols to enhance workforce productivity and reduce healthcare costs.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 44 Table 1</no><caption><p>Demographic variables for the respondents N = 67</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Participant Characteristics</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>  <I>n</I>  </b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>%</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="3" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Gender </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Female </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">25 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Male </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">50 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">75 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Age(years) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">21&ndash;30 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">14.93 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">31&ndash;40 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">20 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">29.85 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">41&ndash;50 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">24 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">35.82 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">51&ndash;60 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">12 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17.91 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">61&ndash;70 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1.49 </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p><tbl id="T2" loc="float"><no>Abstract 44 Table 2</no><caption><p>Descriptive statistics for return-to-work time (days)</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Physical Therapy Implementation</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Mean &plusmn; SD</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Median</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Range</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="4" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Same Day PT (<I>N</I> = 22) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">16.2 &plusmn; 17.9 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">(1&ndash;73) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Delayed PT (<I>N</I> = 45) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">20.1 &plusmn; 17.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">16 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">(1&ndash;78) </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p><tbl id="T3" loc="float"><no>Abstract 44 Table 3</no><caption><p>Return-to-work time (days) by age group and gender within physical therapy timing groups</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="4"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="5" rspan="1">  <b>Same Day Physical Therapy</b> </c><c cspan="4" rspan="1">  <b>Delayed Physical Therapy</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="10" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>  <I>N</I>  </b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Mean &plusmn; <I>SD</I>  </b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Median</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Range</b> </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1">  <b>  <I>N</I>  </b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Mean &plusmn; <I>SD</I>  </b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Median</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Range</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="10" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Age (years) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&le; 40 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">13 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">14.6 &plusmn; 18.7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1&ndash;7 </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1">18 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17.3 &plusmn; 12.3 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1&ndash;45 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&gt;40 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">18.6 &plusmn; 17.7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">16 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5&ndash;62 </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1">27 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">21.9 &plusmn; 19.5 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">16 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1&ndash;78 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Gender </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Female </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17.6 &plusmn; 19.5 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">11 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1&ndash;18 </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1">13 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">27.6 &plusmn; 21.4 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">28 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2&ndash;78 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Male </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">18 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10.3 &plusmn; 6.99 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5&ndash;73 </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1">32 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17.0 &plusmn;1 4.1 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">15 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1&ndash;65 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p><tbl id="T4" loc="float"><no>Abstract 44 Table 4</no><caption><p>Return-to-work time (days) by age group and gender within physical therapy timing groups</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="4"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="5" rspan="1">  <b>Same Day Physical Therapy</b> </c><c cspan="4" rspan="1">  <b>Delayed Physical Therapy</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="10" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>  <I>N</I>  </b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Mean &plusmn; <I>SD</I>  </b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Median</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Range</b> </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1">  <b>  <I>N</I>  </b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Mean &plusmn; <I>SD</I>  </b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Median</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Range</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="10" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Age (years) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&le; 40 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">13 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">14.6 &plusmn; 18.7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1&ndash;7 </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1">18 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17.3 &plusmn; 12.3 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1&ndash;45 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&gt;40 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">18.6 &plusmn; 17.7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">16 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5&ndash;62 </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1">27 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">21.9 &plusmn; 19.5 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">16 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1&ndash;78 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Gender </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Female </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17.6 &plusmn; 19.5 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">11 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1&ndash;18 </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1">13 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">27.6 &plusmn; 21.4 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">28 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2&ndash;78 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Male </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">18 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10.3 &plusmn; 6.99 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5&ndash;73 </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1">32 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17.0 &plusmn;1 4.1 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">15 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1&ndash;65 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foy, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.44</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.44</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[44 Early physical therapy intervention and return-to-work outcomes in work-related acute low back pain: a retrospective quantitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A27</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A27</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A28?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[45 Whole system quality improvement leads to improvement in value, i.e. the bottom line]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A28?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Hospitals continue to face mounting financial pressures, including escalating operational costs and declining reimbursement rates.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Recognizing the positive financial impact of high-quality care, patient safety, and exceptional patient experience is critical to sustaining hospital performance in this challenging environment.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>To drive meaningful improvement despite limited resources, Riverside employed a focused, intentional, data-driven, and evidence-based approach. High-impact strategies were collaboratively implemented across multiple disciplines and departments. This system-wide methodology emphasized the interdependence of structure, people, processes, and technology to achieve integrated and sustainable outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Riverside has demonstrated sustained improvement across ten key performance indicators in acute care over several years (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>). These advancements have led to enhanced patient outcomes and improved performance in both pay-for-reporting and pay-for-performance programs administered by government and commercial payers (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Strengthening quality outcomes and optimizing the capture of value-based reimbursement have a direct and substantial impact on hospital revenue. These efforts are essential in helping hospitals navigate and counteract ongoing financial headwinds.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 45 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Key performance indicators (KPIs) for acute care</p></caption><link locator="45_F1"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 45 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Results of acute care KPIs</p></caption><link locator="45_F2"></fig></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sievers, T., Ogedegbe, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.45</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.45</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[45 Whole system quality improvement leads to improvement in value, i.e. the bottom line]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A28</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A28</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A29?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[46 Lean six sigma initiative saves sepsis lives in emergency department of a large hospital in Virginia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A29?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital (CRMH), an academic medical center in southwestern Virginia, manages over 70,000 annual Emergency Department (ED) visits. Sepsis is the leading cause of hospital admission and mortality nationwide and in November 2022, CRMH&rsquo;s Vizient sepsis mortality index was 1.52&mdash;well above national benchmarks.</p><p>A multidisciplinary team, supported by a Six Sigma Black Belt (SSBB), launched a structured improvement project to reduce mortality and streamline ED sepsis care.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Discuss Lean Six Sigma tools to improve sepsis recognition and treatment.</p></li><li><p>Demonstrate how data driven analysis supports effective root cause analysis.</p></li><li><p>Describe how Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) can build engagement among front-line practitioners.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Using the Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control (DMAIC) framework, the SSBB conducted front-line observations and interviews to validate &lsquo;work as performed&rsquo; and collaborated with the team to map the process using the Suppliers, Inputs, Process steps, Outputs, and Customers (SIPOC), swim lane diagrams, and Value Stream Mapping (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>) that helped define workflows and gaps.</p><p>Statistical analysis progressed from two-variable testing to multivariate analysis (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>). Causes of antibiotic delays were visualized with a Fishbone diagram (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F3">figure 3</cross-ref>).</p><p>To identify and quantify impact from potential disruptions, a Failure Modes and Effect Analysis - FMEA (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F4">figure 4</cross-ref>) was facilitated with participation from dozens of ED staff, nurses, providers, and pharmacists. Identified disruptions&mdash;from patient arrival to inpatient transfer&mdash; were grouped by hazard scores and used to prioritize next steps and plan countermeasures.</p><p>Key Interventions (September 2023 Launch)</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>New ED sepsis workflow &amp; screening process</p></li><li><p>Visual trackboard icons and optimized sepsis order sets</p></li><li><p>System-wide Sepsis Awareness Campaign</p></li><li><p>Electronic health record (EHR) logic to prevent redundant inpatient alerts</p></li><li><p>Sepsis dashboard to monitor key process indicators (KPIs)</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Increased Sepsis recognition &amp; screening (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F5">figures 5</cross-ref> and <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F6">6</cross-ref>)</p></li><li><p>Increased On-time antibiotics (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F7">figure 7</cross-ref>)</p></li><li><p>Increased Orderset utilization (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F8">figure 8</cross-ref>)</p></li><li><p>Decreased Sepsis Mortality Index by 30%  51 lives saved (January-November 2024) (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F9">figure 9</cross-ref>)</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Structured PI + Six Sigma expertise, enabled the structure needed to assess sepsis care in the ED, identify root causes, and design impactful, sustainable solutions.</p></li><li><p>A multidisciplinary team is essential for accurate assessment, solution design, and successful implementation.</p></li><li><p>Combining quantitative data analysis with qualitative input from FMEA is an effective strategy to guide meaningful and lasting quality improvement initiatives in healthcare.</p></li></l></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 46 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Value stream mapping for sepsis present on admission patients (current state)</p></caption><link locator="46_F1"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 46 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Multi variable chart example for NEDOCS score + antibiotic administration + patient outcome</p></caption><link locator="46_F2"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F3"><no>Abstract 46 Figure 3</no><caption><p>Ishikawa diagram for delays in antibiotic administration for sepsis patients</p></caption><link locator="46_F3"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F4"><no>Abstract 46 Figure 4</no><caption><p>Partial section of the failure mode and effect analysis for sepsis- sepsis screening step</p></caption><link locator="46_F4"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F5"><no>Abstract 46 Figure 5</no><caption><p>Carilion Roanoke memorial hospital - sepsis recognition* in the emergency department</p></caption><link locator="46_F5"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F6"><no>Abstract 46 Figure 6</no><caption><p>Carilion Roanoke memorial hospital sepsis screening completion* in the emergency department</p></caption><link locator="46_F6"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F7"><no>Abstract 46 Figure 7</no><caption><p>Carilion Roanoke memorial hospital - antibiotics administration* for sepsis present on admission</p></caption><link locator="46_F7"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F8"><no>Abstract 46 Figure 8</no><caption><p>Carilion Roanoke memorial hospital sepsis orderset utilization* for sepsis present on admission</p></caption><link locator="46_F8"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F9"><no>Abstract 46 Figure 9</no><link locator="46_F9"></fig></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Broyles, K., Cisneros, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.46</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.46</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[46 Lean six sigma initiative saves sepsis lives in emergency department of a large hospital in Virginia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A29</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A32</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A33?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[47 Leveraging systems appreciation: organizational factors predicting workforce thriving and wellbeing]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A33?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Workforce well-being is imperative for care delivery&rsquo;s sustainability and for promoting patient safety and satisfaction. Despite the strong influence of contextual and organizational factors on staff well-being, its baseline assessment remains limited. Mexico&rsquo;s CuidARTE Collaborative aims to foster joy and thriving amongst healthcare workforce across 21 public hospitals. To benchmark performance, a systems understanding of the organizational factors influencing well-being was conducted.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To examine whether the IHI&rsquo;s Organizational Assessment of Conditions to Foster Joy in Work can predict thriving.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>1,395 participants completed the IHI&rsquo;s assessment on autonomy, purpose, safety, teamwork, and equity (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>). Logistic regression tested whether these domains predicted thriving (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Autonomy and purpose were the strongest predictors of thriving (p&lt;0.05), increasing its likelihood by 37% and 47%, respectively. This pattern held among men, evening-shift workers and those aged 50 or older. In contrast, residents were 71% less likely to thrive than other staff (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F3">figure 3</cross-ref>).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Baseline organizational assessments help to identify the drivers most predictive of improvement outcomes (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F4">figure 4</cross-ref>), enabling teams to prioritize targeted change ideas (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F5">figure 5</cross-ref>) to increase the likelihood of success.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 47 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Results from baseline organizational assessment of conditions to foster joy in work</p></caption><link locator="47_F1"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 47 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Baseline thriving from work levels</p></caption><link locator="47_F2"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F3"><no>Abstract 47 Figure 3</no><caption><p>Baseline organizational and workforce characteristics predicting thriving from work</p></caption><link locator="47_F3"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F4"><no>Abstract 47 Figure 4</no><caption><p>Content theory</p></caption><link locator="47_F4"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F5"><no>Abstract 47 Figure 5</no><caption><p>High priority change ideas targeted to each key actor</p></caption><link locator="47_F5"></fig></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ortiz, P., Barrera, K. A., Arrieta, J., Torres, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.47</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.47</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[47 Leveraging systems appreciation: organizational factors predicting workforce thriving and wellbeing]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A33</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A34</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A39?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Author index]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A39?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><p>Ahmed Hussain Kawther Abdullah, <A HREF="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A8.abstract">17</inter-ref></p><p>Alfred Myrtede, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A9.1.abstract" locator-type="url">18</inter-ref></p><p>AlQaseer Maryam, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A8.abstract" locator-type="url">17</inter-ref></p><p>Andrews Erin, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A25.abstract" locator-type="url">43</inter-ref></p><p>Apold Julie, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A21.1.abstract" locator-type="url">38</inter-ref></p><p>Arizmendi-Barrera Klaudia A, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A35.1.abstract" locator-type="url">48</inter-ref></p><p>Arrieta Jafet, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A33.abstract" locator-type="url">47</inter-ref>, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A35.1.abstract" locator-type="url">48</inter-ref></p><p>Aryasinghe Sarindi, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A6.1.abstract" locator-type="url">10</inter-ref></p><p>Auda Gregory, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A13.3.abstract" locator-type="url">28</inter-ref></p><p>Azar Kristen, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A7.2.abstract" locator-type="url">14</inter-ref></p><p>Barilla Dora, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A17.2.abstract" locator-type="url">34</inter-ref></p><p>Barker Pierre, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A1.2.abstract" locator-type="url">2</inter-ref></p><p>Barrera Klaudia Arizmendi, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A33.abstract" locator-type="url">47</inter-ref></p><p>Bevan Helen, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A11.2.abstract" locator-type="url">22</inter-ref></p><p>Billioux Alexander, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A11.1.abstract" locator-type="url">21</inter-ref></p><p>Binkley Charles, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A12.3.abstract" locator-type="url">25</inter-ref></p><p>Birnbaum Nina, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A7.2.abstract" locator-type="url">14</inter-ref></p><p>Bobokalonova Zarrina, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A13.1.abstract" locator-type="url">26</inter-ref></p><p>Bolender Tricia, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A6.1.abstract" locator-type="url">10</inter-ref></p><p>Boord Jeffrey, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A7.4.abstract" locator-type="url">16</inter-ref></p><p>Brooks Mary, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A4.1.abstract" locator-type="url">7</inter-ref></p><p>Brower Krista, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A6.3.abstract" locator-type="url">12</inter-ref></p><p>Broyles Kevin, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A29.abstract" locator-type="url">46</inter-ref></p><p>Burnett Camille, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A16.2.abstract" locator-type="url">32</inter-ref></p><p>Burt Sloane, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A17.1.abstract" locator-type="url">33</inter-ref></p><p>Chang Phillip, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A13.1.abstract" locator-type="url">26</inter-ref></p><p>Chen Kevin, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A15.abstract" locator-type="url">30</inter-ref></p><p>Chowdhury Minara, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A6.1.abstract" locator-type="url">10</inter-ref></p><p>Cisneros Mirla, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A29.abstract" locator-type="url">46</inter-ref></p><p>Clutchette Cojo, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A7.1.abstract" locator-type="url">13</inter-ref></p><p>Conaway Frank, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A17.1.abstract" locator-type="url">33</inter-ref></p><p>Corbett Claire, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A16.1.abstract" locator-type="url">31</inter-ref></p><p>Craddock Krystal, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A12.2.abstract" locator-type="url">24</inter-ref></p><p>Craig Sarah, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A21.1.abstract" locator-type="url">38</inter-ref></p><p>Cummins Kristin, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_4/A36.1.abstract" locator-type="url">50</A></p><p>David Josiah, <inter-ref...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.authorindex</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.authorindex</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Author index]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Author Index</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A39</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A39</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A17-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[35 Using whole system quality and an appreciative inquiry framework to design a quality program]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A17-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>Two Midwestern healthcare systems with over 100 years of history came together as a merger of equals to keep quality care local. A successful merger is one that increases the value of health care by reducing costs and improving outcomes, however, mergers raise the risk of increasing cost and deteriorating improvements in quality.</p><p>The Quality Leadership Team created a merger execution plan grounded in the IHI Whole System Quality Framework to identify and harmonize key essential components of a quality program. Then, key stakeholders were engaged to design and implement a future focused quality strategy using the appreciative inquiry framework to honor the best of each region and dream about a better future together. </p><p>Quality Performance improved as measured by our Quality GPA Composite, inclusive of pertinent acute and ambulatory quality measures, from a 3.2 Baseline to 4.39 (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>) with improvement in several key indicators (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figures 2</cross-ref> and <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F3">3</cross-ref>), as well as payments. Almost 2000 more Medicaid patients experienced care gap closures (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F4">figure 4</cross-ref>). The quality department maintained high engagement, low turnover, and $450,000 per year value.</p><p>Leveraging an evidence-based quality framework, such as the IHI Whole System Quality Framework, with an appreciative inquiry approach can accelerate results through a disruptive process.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 35 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Quality GPA</p></caption><link locator="35_F1"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 35 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Well child visits</p></caption><link locator="35_F2"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F3"><no>Abstract 35 Figure 3</no><caption><p>Breast cancer screening</p></caption><link locator="35_F3"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F4"><no>Abstract 35 Figure 4</no><caption><p>Improving equitable outcomes</p></caption><link locator="35_F4"></fig></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harton, L., Gill, J., Thorsten, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.35</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.35</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[35 Using whole system quality and an appreciative inquiry framework to design a quality program]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A17</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A19</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A19-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[36 All doors open, together: designing a system-wide ambulatory operations center]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A19-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>Carilion Clinic (Roanoke, VA) operates over 1,000 inpatient beds across nine inpatient facilities in Southwest Virginia via its groundbreaking Carilion Transfer and Communications Center (CTaC), an integrated operations center that optimizes inpatient capacity and demand flow processes. Additionally, Carilion sees nearly 7000 visits per day across ambulatory settings over a greater than 250-mile geographic radius. This session will explore the creation of an expanded, unprecedented system operations center for the coordinated throughput of patients across these ambulatory settings. We analyze diverse stakeholder engagement, leadership of key personnel and processes, predictive analytics, and other applications of best practices in improvement science through a &lsquo;team of teams&rsquo; approach. Specific examples include urgent care telemedicine integration, ambulatory referral coordination, and outpatient schedule optimization and resource allocation. Design of the physical plant builds on established principles of distributive situational awareness and multidisciplinary cross-collaboration (Industrial Systems Engineering, Human Factors). We will present time-ordered data related to ambulatory flow delays and failures, demonstrating the value gained via increased visibility and situational awareness across the ambulatory enterprise.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tsipis, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.36</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.36</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[36 All doors open, together: designing a system-wide ambulatory operations center]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A19</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A19-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[37 An improvement project to lower pneumothorax in neonates born at >=36 weeks gestational age]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A19-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) use has improved outcomes in premature neonates. The efficacy of nCPAP in term babies is debatable. Our institutional observed &ndash; expected (O-E) data showed that we had high pneumothorax rates in term babies supported in the delivery room (DR) with nCPAP.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>To test the hypothesis that quality improvement (QI) efforts to reduce nCPAP in the DR would reduce pneumothorax rates.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We performed interventions to change nCPAP use in the DR to optimize nCPAP use with interdisciplinary DR team. We focused on reserving nCPAP for infants remaining hypoxemic on free flow oxygen rather than for signs of high work of breathing and/or the need for ANY supplemental oxygen in neonates born at 36 weeks of gestation or greater. We assessed continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) use in the DR and pneumothorax events in deliveries between pneumothorax before and after the algorithm was implemented. We used statistical process control charts to assess improvement.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>CPAP utilization in the delivery room for infants &gt;36 weeks decreased from 3.4% to 1.0% (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>). Frequency of pneumothorax decreased (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>), with births between pneumothorax events increasing from 293 to 530 (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F3">figure 3</cross-ref>).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>A reduction in the use of CPAP in DR was associated with a decrease in the rate of pneumothorax with no increase in neonates with respiratory distress.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 37 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Percent chart shows the process measure assessing utilization of CPAPs in the delivery room. The baseline was extended after August 17, and special cause was then detected twice related to interventions (see annotations) lowering the mean to 2.1% and then to 0.5%. Abbreviations: CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; LCL, lower control limit; NRP, Neonatal Resuscitation Program; UCL, upper control limit</p></caption><link locator="37_F1"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 37 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Vermont Oxford network data highlighting an elevated rate of pneumothorax. Observed to expected pneumothorax and rate of pneumothorax among Neonatal Intensive Care Unite (NICU) admissions in term neonates &gt; 37 weeks gestation. Pneumothorax rates as a function of NICU admissions decreased substantially from 2016 to 2019, while the observed &ndash; expected (0-E) rates decreased from approximately 8 in 2016 to approximately 2 in 2018 and then less than zero from 2019&ndash;2021</p></caption><link locator="37_F2"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F3"><no>Abstract 37 Figure 3</no><caption><p>Geometric chart assessing the outcome measure of births between pneumothorax events</p></caption><link locator="37_F3"></fig></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandall, J., Welty, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.37</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.37</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[37 An improvement project to lower pneumothorax in neonates born at >=36 weeks gestational age]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A21</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A21-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[38 Leading a New era of safety: stories and strategies from Minnesotas caring safely tour]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A21-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Traditional safety efforts focus on preventing errors and analyzing harm, but this can overlook the many ways care goes right. To build a more resilient and nurturing safety culture, growing attention is being given to Safety-II principles&mdash;an approach that values learning from success, everyday excellence, and the complexity of care.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>The Caring Safely Tour, led by the Minnesota Alliance for Patient Safety (MAPS), aims to shift the safety narrative from failure analysis to understanding what enables success. Objectives include fostering cross-setting collaboration, amplifying patient and staff voices, strengthening safety culture through shared learning, and deepening understanding of human factors that shape safety outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This statewide initiative spans the continuum of care, engaging large systems, rural and community hospitals, long-term care, and patient partners in shared learning. Each tour stop features real-world site visits, structured debriefs, and facilitated discussions to explore system strengths and innovations. Participants co-identify &lsquo;wise practices,&rsquo; which are synthesized and shared statewide through follow-up learning sessions.</p></sec><sec><st>Results and Conclusions</st><p>Across five tour stops and more than 100 participants, the tour strengthened relationships, trust, and insight into the human and system factors that influence safety. Participants reported renewed motivation and resilience, applying new ideas within their own organizations. Host sites offered peer support and practical tools to extend learning beyond the tour. By learning from success and embracing complexity, the Caring Safely Tour demonstrates a transformative, story-based model that advances compassionate, connected safety culture across Minnesota.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliar, L., Jacob, A., Craig, S., Apold, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.38</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.38</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[38 Leading a New era of safety: stories and strategies from Minnesotas caring safely tour]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A21</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A21</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A21-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[39 Balancing speed and rigor: a short, randomized test to optimize post-discharge communication]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A21-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>Health systems need methods to evaluate quality improvement (QI) interventions that are quick, practical and analytically robust, even when outcome events are rare. We often must choose between two plausible options, and defaulting to the status quo because we haven&rsquo;t met conventional significance thresholds (p &lt;0.05) may not be the best strategy. Here we present one such example, used to assess whether post-discharge phone calls can be safely replaced with text messages - reducing staff workload without compromising care quality.</p><p>470 patients discharged after elective outpatient surgery were randomized over 3 months to call or text (<cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>). Outcomes were 14-day readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits, both of which occur at low rates. ED visits and readmissions did not differ significantly between groups, though power was limited (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>). To assess the likelihood of missed harm, 10,000 bootstrap simulations were conducted (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>). Text patients had worse outcomes in only 12% of simulations for ED visits and 31% for admissions (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F3">figures 3</cross-ref> and <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F4">4</cross-ref>).</p><p>In conclusion, a short, randomized test found no signal of harm when switching post-discharge calls to texts, suggesting texts are a safe, resource-efficient alternative in this population. This method is a useful strategy for evaluating operational interventions that balances efficiency with analytic rigor.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 39 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Hospital admission and ED visit rates within 14 days post-discharge by outreach type. Bar chart comparing 14-day hospital admission and emergency department (ED) visit rates between patients who received a follow-up phone call (purple, n=240) and those who received a text message (green, n=230) after discharge. Admission rates were 5.8% in the call group and 4.8% in the text group. ED visit rates were 1.7% for the call group and 0.4% for the text group. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Differences were not statistically significant</p></caption><link locator="39_F1"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 39 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Bootstrap sampling approach for analyzing rare outcomes. Illustration of the bootstrap sampling method used to assess the likelihood of rare post-discharge events. The original dataset was resampled with replacement 10,000 times to simulate the distribution of emergency department visits and hospitalizations across the text and call groups. This approach enabled estimation of the probability that the text group had worse outcomes, despite low event rates</p></caption><link locator="39_F2"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F3"><no>Abstract 39 Figure 3</no><caption><p>Simulated difference in 14-day ED visit rates between text and call groups (bootstrap analysis). Histogram with overlaid density curve showing the distribution of 10,000 bootstrap simulations comparing emergency department (ED) visit rates between the call and text message groups. The x-axis reflects the simulated difference (Call ED rate &ndash; Text ED rate). The shaded curve illustrates the probability density across simulated differences. Values left of the dashed line indicate simulations where the ED rate was higher in the text group. In only 12% of simulations did the text group have a worse ED rate. Text follow-up was equal to or better than calls in 88% of cases</p></caption><link locator="39_F3"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F4"><no>Abstract 39 Figure 4</no><caption><p>Simulated difference in 14-day hospital encounter rates between text and call groups (bootstrap analysis). Histogram with overlaid density curve showing the distribution of 10,000 bootstrap simulations comparing 14-day hospital encounter rates between the call and text groups. The x-axis represents the simulated difference (Call hospitalization rate &ndash; Text hospitalization rate). The shaded curve reflects the probability density across simulated outcomes. Values to the left of the dashed line indicate simulations where the text group had a higher hospital encounter rate. In 31% of simulations, the text group had worse outcomes, while in 69% of simulations, the text group performed equally or better in terms of hospitalizations</p></caption><link locator="39_F4"></fig></p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 39 Table 1</no><caption><p>Baseline characteristics of patients in call and text groups with standardized mean differences (SMDs). This table summarizes patient characteristics across the call (N=240) and text (N=230) groups. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) are provided to assess covariate balance; an SMD &gt;0.25 was considered indicative of meaningful imbalance. Language (SMD = 0.314) and insurance (SMD = 0.306) exceeded this threshold. Sensitivity analyses adjusting for these variables showed no meaningful change in results</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Variables</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Call (N=240)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Text (N=230)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>SMD</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="4" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Sex</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Female </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">103 (42.9%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">78 (33.9%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.186 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Mean Age</b> (SD) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">67.5 (12.1) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">66.0 (14.0) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.114 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Language</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.314  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Bengali </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">36 (15.0%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">38 (16.5%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> English </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">127 (52.9%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">118 (51.3%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Spanish </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">46 (19.2%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">42 (18.3%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Race</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.135  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Asian </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">68 (28.3%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">68 (29.6%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Black or African American </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">29 (12.1%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">22 (9.6%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Hispanic or Latino or Spanish </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">45 (18.8%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">42 (18.3%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Missing </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">36 (15.0%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">38 (16.5%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> White </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">56 (23.3%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">56 (24.3%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Discharge Department</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.098  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> TH HCC 13 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">72 (30.0%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">71 (30.9%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> TH KP 3 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">46 (19.2%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">48 (20.9%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> TH KP 5 CARDIAC CATH </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">24 (10.0%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17 (7.4%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> TH KP 5 PRE POST </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">98 (40.8%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">94 (40.9%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Insurance</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.306  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> MEDICAID </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">26 (10.8%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">13 (5.7%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> MEDICARE </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">39 (16.3%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">21 (9.1%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Private </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">175 (72.9%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">196 (85.2%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Korostoff-Larsson, O., Lu, J., Jian, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.39</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.39</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[39 Balancing speed and rigor: a short, randomized test to optimize post-discharge communication]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A21</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A24</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A24-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[40 Breaking the bottleneck: rethinking hospital throughput from the inside out]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A24-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Hospitals across the U.S. face major challenges with patient throughput and emergency department (ED) boarding, impacting safety, engagement, and outcomes. Throughput is a systems-level issue that requires coordinated solutions.</p></sec><sec><st>Problem or Challenge</st><p>ED boarding is often mislabeled an &lsquo;ED issue&rsquo; but the root causes are systemic. Discharge delays, inefficient workflows, and fear of readmissions block efforts to improve throughput and care quality.</p></sec><sec><st>Strategy or Experience</st><p>All hospital team members contribute to throughput. Our hospital-wide initiative improved ownership, streamlined discharges, and enhanced communication. This broke down barriers between ED and inpatient teams, creating a culture of innovation and safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>As patient days decreased, satisfaction, safety, and engagement increased. Excess days reduced by 28%, boarding minutes fell 90%, and patient satisfaction increased 57%. Wait times, ED falls, and workplace violence all notably decreased as well. Readmission rates remain stable despite increasing patient volumes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>This session challenges assumptions around ED boarding, connects safety risks to throughput bottlenecks, and equips participants with practical strategies to drive innovation and sustainable change.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Higgins, J., White, J., Flinn, K. H., McIntyre, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.40</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.40</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[40 Breaking the bottleneck: rethinking hospital throughput from the inside out]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A24</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A24</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A24-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[41 Implementation of a digital call bell solution to improve experience]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A24-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Current call bell systems, which include visual and audio cues, are critical in alerting nursing staff to patient needs, but lack contextual information on the request urgency. Nurses must attend to patient call bells quickly, irrespective of the call bell urgency, impacting patient safety and patient/staff experience.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>This initiative, part of a broader improvement strategy, aimed to implement a digital call bell system to provide more information regarding the request urgency.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The digital call bell was implemented for 3 months in two Childbirth units. Call bell response time data and pre/post qualitative survey data have been collected to evaluate the impact on experience.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Response time was reduced by 58.2% in Unit A and 44.7% in Unit D after the implementation of a digital call bell. 56% of the staff reported that additional information provided by the digital call bell increased efficiency.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Implications</st><p>Reducing response times improves patient safety and experience, and additional information from digital call bells allows nurses to prioritize and optimize care. Integration with existing call-bell systems may result in further improvements in the care experience.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomson, N., Quantz, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.41</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.41</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[41 Implementation of a digital call bell solution to improve experience]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A24</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A24</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A24-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[42 Leading quality through education]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A24-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>A strong, system-wide quality improvement (QI) culture is essential for consistent, high-quality patient outcomes, yet many healthcare organizations struggle to embed QI into their everyday operations. The need for cohesive, cross-disciplinary QI education is increasingly urgent in the face of rising complexity and demand for accountability.</p><p>This session will:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Analyze the core components of a sustainable QI culture.</p></li><li><p>Explore the role of system-wide education in fostering QI engagement.</p></li><li><p>Share strategies for designing impactful, scalable QI training programs.</p></li></l></p><p>We will present an integrative review of current QI education offerings from Nationwide Children&rsquo;s Hospital. We will explore stakeholder engagement, curriculum development, and faculty support strategies.</p><p>Institutions that implemented comprehensive QI education demonstrated increased staff engagement, improved interprofessional collaboration, and measurable gains in safety, quality and process metrics.</p><p>Embedding QI through education builds shared language, accountability, and empowerment. A strong QI culture requires ongoing, structured learning tailored to diverse roles&mdash;laying the foundation for sustainable, system-wide improvement.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lehman, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.42</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.42</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[42 Leading quality through education]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A24</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A25</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A35-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[48 Moving beyond run and control charts to establish a causal pathway and evaluate impact: a case study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A35-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>While run charts and statistical process control (SPC) charts are powerful tools for visualizing data over time and detecting non-random variation, they have methodological limitations when used to infer causality in quality improvement (QI) initiatives. In complex, real-world settings where randomization is often not feasible, Quasi-Experimental Designs (QEDs) offer a practical approach to establishing causal pathways for evaluating intervention effectiveness. The 2nd Mexico in Alliance with St. Jude Golden Hour Quality Improvement Collaborative was implemented across 85 Latin American hospitals with the aim of reducing the time between triage and antibiotic administration (TTA) for febrile pediatric hematology-oncology patients (fPHOP) who present to the Emergency Department to &lt;= 60 minutes (Golden Hour).</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Establish the causal pathway and evaluate the impact of Golden Hour on reducing infection-related complications using QEDs.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Segmented regression was applied to ITS data collected between November 2021 and July 2024. Between-group comparisons were performed using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. Effect sizes were reported as absolute risk reduction (ARR) and number needed to treat (NNT).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>For 10,442 fPHO reported events, the median TTA showed a significant monthly reduction (&ndash;8.5; p&lt;0.001) from 70 (IQR: 40&ndash;150) to 41 minutes (IQR: 30&ndash;71) following the implementation of the Golden Hour. The intervention led to an immediate 5.8 percentage point reduction in sepsis incidence (95% CI: &ndash;9.9 to &ndash;1.6; p&lt;0.05) (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>), which further decreased from 7.7% during the implementation phase to 4.3% in the sustainability phase (p&lt;0.001). The ARR was 0.5%, 7.8%, and 0.7%, and the NNT was 189, 13, and 142 for mortality, sepsis, and ICU transfers, respectively (p&lt;0.05)</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>QEDs offer a rigorous complement to run and SPC charts for establishing the causal pathway evidence of QI initiatives. Using QEDs, we demonstrated the Golden Hour effectiveness in improving and sustaining clinical outcomes at scale in real-world settings.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 48 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Segmented regression on the impact of the golden hour on sepsis incidence</p></caption><link locator="48_F1"></fig></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Estrada-Orozco, K., Arizmendi-Barrera, K. A., Jorro-Baron, F., Echendia-Abud, N., Gonzalez-Guzman, M., Panjwani, S., Friedrich, P., Arrieta, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.48</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.48</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[48 Moving beyond run and control charts to establish a causal pathway and evaluate impact: a case study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A35</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A35</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A35-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[49 Rural tele clinic for lung nodules - a pilot initiative]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A35-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Rural patients with lung cancer have higher incidence and mortality rates than their urban counterparts. Alabama is predominantly rural, with 82% of its counties being rural. The University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Hospital is the state&rsquo;s only National Cancer Institute (NCI) recognized cancer center, providing comprehensive multidisciplinary care for lung cancer patients. However, patients who live in rural areas do not have easy access to this level of care.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>As above.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We established a tele-lung nodule clinic at a rural hospital, where a specialist could evaluate patients via telemedicine and then travel to UAB if they needed a procedure. We also simplified the referral process.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Post-intervention analysis revealed a decrease in the wait time for rural patients to be seen in the clinic from 29 to 8 days (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>). The mean distance traveled by rural patients for clinic visits also improved and is now comparable to that of local County residents, 13 miles vs 16 miles (<cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>). The total number of patients seen from rural Counties also increased by more than double in 2020 compared to 2019.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>This pilot project shows promising results for access to care for the rural population with suspected lung cancer when an innovative telemedicine approach and a simplified referral process were implemented.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 49 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Time to clinic pre and post intervention</p></caption><link locator="49_F1"></fig></p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 49 Table 1</no><caption><p>Distance traveled by rural patients vs. Jefferson country-post intervention</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Pre-Intervention</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Post-Intervention</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="3" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Rural patients: </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">85 miles (mean) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">16 miles (mean) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Local patients: </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">13 miles (mean) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">13 miles (mean) </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thachuthara-George, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.49</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.49</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[49 Rural tele clinic for lung nodules - a pilot initiative]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A35</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A36</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A36-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[50 Surviving sepsis: integrating standardization and customization for system-wide change]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A36-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>In early 2023, our hospital&rsquo;s critical/severe sepsis mortality rate was double the pediatric national benchmark (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>) despite continued committee work. We will share how we used IHI improvement methodology and principles of &lsquo;mass customization&rsquo; to rapidly reduce sepsis mortality across our hospital system.</p><p>Attendees will participate in simulations to compare &lsquo;sepsis screens&rsquo; and identify the varying needs of the emergency department (ED), intensive care unit (ICU), and inpatient wards. They will then employ standard work to build &lsquo;treatment plans.&rsquo; The activities will be analogous to how we designed a quality initiative to reduce sepsis mortality.</p><p>We developed a formal quality improvement (QI) team with stakeholders across two campuses and used QI methodology to identify key drivers and implement rapid Plan, Study, Do, Act (PDSA) cycles (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>). We implemented unit-specific screening tools, huddle processes, and treatment pathways with informatics integration to improve recognition and treatment of sepsis.</p><p>From May 2023 to December 2024, our team achieved a 67% 12-month mortality rate reduction from 1.04/1000 admissions to 0.34, now outperforming the national benchmark (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>).</p><p>We applied rigorous QI methodology to substantially decrease sepsis mortality (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figures 2</cross-ref> and <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F3">3</cross-ref>) by decreasing care variation (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F4">figures 4</cross-ref> and <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F5">5</cross-ref>) while customizing to the needs of each unit. This project models how to leverage system-wide QI teams to drive rapid improvement in priority quality outcomes.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 50 Figure 1</no><caption><p>System critical/severe sepsis key driver diagram (KDD). The key driver diagram (KDD) developed from mortality reviews and evidence-driven sepsis bundles was used to guide system improvements</p></caption><link locator="50_F1"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 50 Figure 2</no><caption><p>System critical/severe sepsis mortality rate rolling 12-month graph. The implementation of the screening tools and standardized huddle and treatment processes resulted in the critical/severe sepsis mortality rate improving from 1.04/1,000 hospital admissions (rolling 12-month rate) in May 2023 to 0.34/1,000 hospital admissions in December 2024 - a 67% reduction in critical/severe sepsis mortality across the organization</p></caption><link locator="50_F2"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F3"><no>Abstract 50 Figure 3</no><caption><p>System critical/severe sepsis mortality rate SPC graph. Comparing baseline period (January 2022 &ndash; May 2023) to the implementation period (June 2023 &ndash; March 2025), showing a centerline decrease from 1.04/1000 hospital admissions to 0.27/1000</p></caption><link locator="50_F3"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F4"><no>Abstract 50 Figure 4</no><caption><p>System critical/severe sepsis screening compliance p chart. Comparing the baseline period (Jan 2022 &ndash; May 2023) to the implementation period (June 2023 &ndash; March 2025). The 55% centerline shifted to 81% postimplementation</p></caption><link locator="50_F4"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F5"><no>Abstract 50 Figure 5</no><caption><p>System critical/severe sepsis huddle compliance p chart. Comparing the baseline period (Jan 2022 &ndash; May 2023) to the implementation period (June 2023 &ndash; March 2025), in which the centerline of 69% shifted to 92% post-implementation</p></caption><link locator="50_F5"></fig></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shah, S., David, J., Cummins, K., Wagers, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.50</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.50</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[50 Surviving sepsis: integrating standardization and customization for system-wide change]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A36</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A38</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/i?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Background]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/i?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><p>For the third year in a row, the Scientific Symposium at IHI&rsquo;s Annual Forum, now scheduled for December 7&ndash;10, 2025, in Anaheim, California, is fully integrated into the event&rsquo;s programming.</p><p>Building on the momentum of 2024, which saw a record number of high-quality global submissions, the 2025 IHI Forum continues to expand the reach and rigor of its offerings. Scientific abstracts were accepted across all Forum tracks, ensuring diversity of topics and depth of experience and learning. Abstracts underwent a rigorous peer review process and were selected for oral and poster presentation to highlight the most innovative and impactful work.</p><p>As in prior years, accepted work is grouped into two broad categories:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p><b>Results-Based:</b> Practical applications of improvement science in areas such as patient safety, health equity, large-scale change, and population health.</p></li><li><p><b>Methods-Focused:</b> Foundational and innovative approaches to design, implementation, and evaluation in improvement science, with growing connections to related fields like implementation science...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.background</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.background</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Background]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Background</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>i</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>i</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5 Mission ready: enhancing care for military families and veterans]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>Military personnel returning home often face service-related conditions and challenges that impact their quality of life and that of their families. While most veterans qualify for Veterans Affairs (VA) services, over 83% use both VA and non-VA services. Not all clinicians are equipped to provide culturally sensitive care, so the service members, veterans, and their families (SMVF) population often navigates a healthcare landscape that fails to fully address their unique physical, mental, and social challenges.</p><p>We surveyed 4,844 family medicine physicians in the U.S., with 1,194 responding, showed that prior training in veteran care significantly improves their knowledge and confidence in treating these patients.</p><p>The Veteran Ready Healthcare Clinician (VRHC) program, funded by the Hearst Foundation, includes online modules, virtual clinical sessions with case studies, and a cumulative observed structured clinical exam with simulated patient interactions. Over 200 residents and physicians have been trained, with 120 completing certification. Insights from the program highlight how focused education can enhance clinician readiness to meet the complex needs of the veteran population.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iroku-Malize, T., Siddiqui, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.5</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.5</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5 Mission ready: enhancing care for military families and veterans]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A2</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A3</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A3?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6 Organizational interventions to address burnout, moral injury, and grief in the homeless workforce]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A3?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>Burnout, moral injury, and grief (BMG) are common experiences for staff in the homeless services sector. Addressing these challenges is essential for employee retention and continuity of care. This study aimed to assess BMG levels, evaluate preferred organizational interventions, and supervisor support among healthcare teams serving unsheltered homeless populations. Between Mar. and Dec. 2024, a cross-sectional survey was conducted with 309 attendees at 6 training sessions across 4 counties in California. The survey included questions on BMG, assessed via a 5-item Likert scale, a non-mutually exclusive set of options for preferred interventions, and a supervisor support measure. Participants were predominantly female (72%) and Hispanic/Latino (47%). (<cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">Table 1</cross-ref>) The survey revealed that greater supervisor support was correlated with lower levels of burnout (r = 0.25&ndash;0.38), moral injury (r = 0.13&ndash;0.21), and grief (r = 0.12&ndash;0.22). Most commonly endorsed interventions included free gym memberships (58.6%) for burnout, advocacy training (46.0%), team retreats (45.6%) for moral injury, and facilitated team debriefing (52.4%) for grief. (<cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T2">Table 2</cross-ref>, <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>, <cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T3">table 3</cross-ref>) This research underscores the importance of evaluating BMG in this workforce and highlights the vital role supervisors play, suggesting implemented interventions should be role-specific and culturally tailored.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 6 Table 1</no><caption><p>Demographics of survey respondents</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Characteristic</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>N = 309</b>  <I>  <sup>1</sup>  </I> </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Role </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> RN </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">34 (11.4%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> LVN/MA </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">31 (10.4%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> MD/DO </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">23 (7.69%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> PA/NP </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">33 (11.0%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Community Health Worker </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">73 (24.4%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Case Manager </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">31 (10.4%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Housing Navigator </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5 (1.67%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Social Worker </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10 (3.34%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Administrative Support </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">42 (14.0%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Other </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17 (5.69%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Gender </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Male </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">76 (25.8%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Female </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">212 (71.9%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Other </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7 (2.37%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Race/Ethnicity </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Asian </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">37 (12.4%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Black </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">22 (7.38%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Hispanic/Latino </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">139 (46.6%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Other </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">21 (7.05%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> White </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">79 (26.5%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Education </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> GED, HS, or Less </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">20 (6.69%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Some College </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">34 (11.4%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Associates/Technical </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">50 (16.7%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Bachelors </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">88 (29.4%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Graduate </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">107 (35.8%) </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p><tbl id="T2" loc="float"><no>Abstract 6 Table 2</no><caption><p>Preferred interventions for burnout, moral injury, and grief by survey respondents</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1">  <b>Characteristic N=309</b>  <sup>1</sup> </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce Burnout: Free gym membership or access to yoga classes </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">181 (58.6%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce Burnout: Improved Health Benefits </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">168 (54.4%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce Burnout: Vouchers for Other Healing Practices </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">158 (51.1%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce Burnout: Free or low-cost individual  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">130 (42.1%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce Burnout: Community Activities </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">96 (31.1%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce Burnout: Free Spa Access or Massage Access </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">88 (28.5%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce Burnout: Free or low-cost group therapy </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">75 (24.3%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce Burnout: More Paid Time Off </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">49 (15.9%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce Burnout: None </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">8 (2.59%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce MI: Advocacy Training (more training and opportunities on how to interface with local decision makers, etc.) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">142 (46.0%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce MI: Team Retreats </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">141 (45.6%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce MI: Reflective Debriefings Sessions </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">139 (45.0%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce MI: More Paid Time Off </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">139 (45.0%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce MI: Shadowing opportunities amongst individuals in the same organization (e.g. leadership shadows patient facing employee) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">114 (36.9%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce MI: Ride Alongs with other teams </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">104 (33.7%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce MI: Improved Health Benefits </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">91 (29.4%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce MI: Community Activities </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">84 (27.2%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce MI: Vouchers for other Healing Practices </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">37 (12.0%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce Grief: Facilitated team debriefing sessions </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">162 (52.4%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce Grief: None </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">128 (41.4%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce Grief: Memorializing Deaths of Patients </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">109 (35.3%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce Grief: One-on-one professional psychological debriefing after a death of a patient </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">107 (34.6%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce Grief: Clear policies and procedures of what to do if a patient death occurs </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">14 (4.53%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce Grief: Vouchers that can be used for self-care practices </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0 (0%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce Grief: Paid Time Off following patients&rsquo; death </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0 (0%) </c></r></tblbdy><tblfn><p>  <I>  <sup>1</sup>  </I> n (%)</p></tblfn></tbl></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 6 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Burnout, moral injury, and grief score by role</p></caption><link locator="6_F1"></fig></p><p><tbl id="T3" loc="float"><no>Abstract 6 Table 3</no><caption><p>Endorsement of strategies to reduce grief distribution by role</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Characteristic</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>RN, LVN, MA</b>  <br>N = 65<I>  <sup>1</sup>  </I> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>MD, DO, PA, NP</b>  <br>N = 56<I>  <sup>1</sup>  </I> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Case Manager, Housing Navigator</b>  <br>N = 36<I>  <sup>1</sup>  </I> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Social Worker</b>  <br>N = 10<I>  <sup>1</sup>  </I> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Community Health Worker</b>  <br>N = 73<I>  <sup>1</sup>  </I> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Administrative Support</b>  <br>N = 42<I>  <sup>1</sup>  </I> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Other</b>  <br>N = 17<I>  <sup>1</sup>  </I> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>p-value</b>  <I>  <sup>2</sup>  </I> </c></r><r><c cspan="9" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce Grief: Memorializing Patients </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">21 (32.3%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">24 (42.9%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">11 (30.6%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6 (60.0%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">26 (35.6%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">14 (33.3%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7 (41.2%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.6 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce Grief: Team Debriefings </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">37 (56.9%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">31 (55.4%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">13 (36.1%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3 (30.0%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">43 (58.9%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">26 (61.9%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9 (52.9%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.2 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce Grief: Paid Time Off </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce Grief: Professional Debriefings </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">23 (35.4%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">18 (32.1%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">11 (30.6%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3 (30.0%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">39 (53.4%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9 (21.4%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4 (23.5%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.018 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce Grief: Clear Policies &amp; Procedures </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3 (4.62%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2 (3.57%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4 (11.1%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0 (0%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1 (1.37%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2 (4.76%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2 (11.8%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.2 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce Grief: Vouchers for Self-Care </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce Grief: None </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">26 (40.0%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">21 (37.5%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">12 (33.3%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4 (40.0%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">38 (52.1%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">21 (50.0%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6 (35.3%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.4 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reduce Grief: Something Else </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">31 (47.7%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">28 (50.0%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">13 (36.1%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2 (20.0%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">38 (52.1%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">13 (31.0%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5 (29.4%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.10 </c></r></tblbdy><tblfn><p>  <I>  <sup>1</sup>  </I> n (%)</p></tblfn><tblfn><p>  <I>  <sup>2</sup>  </I> Fisher&rsquo;s Exact Test for Count Data with simulated p-value (based on 2000 replicates)</p></tblfn></tbl></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frink, E., Feldman, C., Kogan, A. C., Pocock, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.6</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.6</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6 Organizational interventions to address burnout, moral injury, and grief in the homeless workforce]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A3</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A4</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A5?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[9 Achieving equity through the community of solutions]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A5?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>Achieving equity is a complex challenge. Despite decades of recognition of inequity and disparity among racially and ethnically minoritized groups, disproportionate harm and barriers to achieving one&rsquo;s full life potential persist. Developed during the Spreading Community Accelerators through Learning and Evaluation (SCALE) initiative, the Community of Solutions (COS) proposes such an approach by which community coalitions can improve equity. An evaluation of SCALE strategies (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>), methods, and tools, including the COS (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>), to improve equity among coalitions that participated in the SCALE initiative has been completed. The purpose of this study was to understand how coalitions that engaged in the SCALE initiative currently use SCALE concepts, including the COS, to address equity in order to identify what elements of the framework have been sustained since the effort concluded in 2020. This thorough, current state assessment of the enduring strengths of the SCALE effort may provide insights to coalitions, funders, and policymakers as to how to maximize the impact of their work on equity. A thorough assessment of the current state and enduring strengths of this work in 2025 provide needed insight to other coalitions and funders as to how they can maximize the impact of their work on equity. Moreover, this study adds to the existing body of literature that articulates the leadership practices embedded in SCALE concepts, including the COS, that advance coalition efforts to improve equity.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 9 Figure 1</no><caption><p>SCALE interactive systems framework</p></caption><link locator="9_F1"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 9 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Community of solutions framework</p></caption><link locator="9_F2"></fig></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DeMarzo, B., Howard, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.9</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.9</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[9 Achieving equity through the community of solutions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A5</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A6</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A8?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[17 From risk to resilience: the zero harm healthcare journey of eastern health cluster Saudi Arabia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A8?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Eastern Health Cluster (EHC) is maturing as an accountable care organization (ACO) delivering value-based care (VBC) for the Kingdom of Saudia Arabia (KSA)&rsquo;s Vision 2030. EHC prioritizes building a just culture to achieve zero harm. Our 2019 survey on Patient Safety Culture (SOPS) survey showed 68% of staff never reported safety events and 32% avoided speaking up. It prompted leadership to run a holistic improvement initiative.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Following interventions applied:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Change Management-shift from &lsquo;Who failed?&rsquo; to &lsquo;What failed?&rsquo; via Just Culture adoption, increase psychological safety through anonymous reporting, engage patients in post-event processes &amp; training.</p></li><li><p>Governance-deploy electronic safety reporting, safety heat maps, and restructured committees to include 50% frontline staff.</p></li><li><p>Leadership-establish peer-led evaluations, leadership walk rounds with &lsquo;My Safety error&rsquo; sharing, &amp; C-suite safety huddles.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In 2023 SOPS, staff willingness to report errors increased by 69%, overall positive safety reports increased by 9% (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>). In 2025, overall safety reporting increased by 677% (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>), near miss reports increased by 240% (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F3">figure 3</cross-ref>), sentinel safety events reduced 25% (0.102 to 0.074/1,000 patient days).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Culture change requires equal investment in leadership behavior and system design. Our peer-accountability model focuses on psychological safety rather than compliance. Sustainable transformation in health systems requires moving beyond checklist to human-centered safety.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 17 Figure 1</no><caption><p>EHC patient safety culture survey</p></caption><link locator="17_F1"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 17 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Overall safety event reporting-EHC</p></caption><link locator="17_F2"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F3"><no>Abstract 17 Figure 3</no><caption><p>Near miss reporting-EHC</p></caption><link locator="17_F3"></fig></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[AlQaseer, M., Khalil, A., Ahmed Hussain, K. A., Maqsood, M. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.17</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.17</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[17 From risk to resilience: the zero harm healthcare journey of eastern health cluster Saudi Arabia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A8</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A9</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A10?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[20 Improving quality and patient safety presentations at board meetings]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A10?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Effective board governance is essential to advancing health system quality. Connecticut Children&rsquo;s, a non-profit 100% pediatric healthcare system, has integrated the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Framework for Effective Board Governance of Health System Quality (&lsquo;IHI Framework&rsquo;) to better align its Board of Directors (BOD) and Board Quality Improvement Committee (BQIC) around strategic quality goals. Using both the IHI Framework and a structured, principle-based quality improvement (QI) approach, Connecticut Children&rsquo;s strengthened alignment between frontline improvement work and board-level priorities.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>In June 2022, Connecticut Children&rsquo;s BOD completed the IHI Governance of Quality Assessment (GQA). Survey results were used to guide our adoption and implementation of the IHI Framework.</p><p>Weekly BQIC planning meetings were established to ensure presentations aligned with IHI Framework domains. Progress was tracked via Connecticut Children&rsquo;s House of Quality (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>) and reported annually to foster transparency and accountability.</p><p>Following a second GQA in June 2024, targeted improvements were made using iterative Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. To further enhance these PDSAs, a Lean Black Belt project launched in September 2024 to redesign the BQIC workflow. A key outcome was a standardized presentation process, including early presenter engagement, structured preparation meetings, and tools such as a BQIC Presenter checklist (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>) and FAQ guide. The project enhanced strategic relevance and consistency of content delivered to the BQIC.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Between 2022 and 2024, Connecticut Children&rsquo;s improved on 80% of the 30 IHI Framework elements within the GQA. Anecdotal feedback highlighted increased enthusiasm and ownership of quality outcomes among board members.</p><p>The IHI Framework is embedded not only in BQIC but across broader governance structures. Connecticut Children&rsquo;s Performance Improvement Plan initiatives are explicitly linked to the IHI Framework. Additionally, the IHI Framework informs the curriculum of Connecticut Children&rsquo;s Popik Family Quality and Patient Safety Fellowship, supporting future quality leaders.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Connecticut Children&rsquo;s demonstrates how operationalizing the IHI Framework using a QI approach can enhance board engagement, improve information sharing to enhance strategic decision making, and better align decisions with quality goals. The approach is scalable and offers a replicable roadmap for other healthcare organizations aiming to elevate board engagement in quality and patient safety.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 21 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Framework for effective board governance of health system quality at Connecticut children&rsquo;s</p></caption><link locator="21_F1"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 21 Figure 2</no><caption><p>BQIC presenter checklist</p></caption><link locator="21_F2"></fig></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pelletier, L., Levine, D., Harvey, L. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.20</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.20</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[20 Improving quality and patient safety presentations at board meetings]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A10</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A11</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A15?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[30 Scaling RSV immunization system-wide: impact on cost and care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A15?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>In 2023, Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) immunizations (Nirsevimab for infants and Abrysvo for pregnant mothers) were recommended by the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices. To accelerate RSV protection across our health system, we implemented a multidisciplinary strategy with targeted interventions across different levels within the organization (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>). In hospitals, we established administrative processes with electronic health record integration, negotiated increased payment for well newborn nurseries, enrolling facilities as Vaccines for Children sites and developed parent education materials. In primary care, we developed a network-wide strategy for both employed and independent practices, which included communication processes between hospitals and clinics to track RSV protection status, an incentive payment for office-based nirsevimab administration, and a direct-to-consumer digital and mass media campaign. Preliminary data for 2024&ndash;2025 season demonstrates a &gt; 200% increase in RSV immunization uptake across the health system. Among our value-based care population, there were no intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and lower hospitalization rates in immunized infants. Additionally, the average length of stay for hospitalized infants decreased. To sustain our gains, we have launched quality improvement initiatives to adapt our strategies for next season.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 30 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Nirsevimab immunization key driver diagram</p></caption><link locator="30_F1"></fig></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.30</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.30</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[30 Scaling RSV immunization system-wide: impact on cost and care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A15</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A16</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/Aii?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Acknowledgements]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/Aii?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><p>On behalf of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, the hosts would like to thank the individuals whose contributions have made the 2025 IHI Forum a success. Particular thanks are due to the abstract reviewers, without whose efforts we could not have accomplished a Forum of this quality: Adrian Smith, Alex Dummett, Amy Weckman, Barbara Rubino, Cara Hull, Carolyn Candiello, Chapy Venkatesan, Chris Lemaster, Don Goldmann, Eddie Turner, Fran Ganz-Lord, Helen Macfie, Jeff Salvon-Harman, Josh Clark, Kelly Randall, Kristen Azar, Marina Renton, Ndidi Unaka, Patricia McGaffigan, Pierre Barker, Rebecca Steinfield, Regina Berman, Shannon Welch, Sonya Panjwani, Steppe Mette, Tara Bristol-Rouse, Tom Spiegel, and Vlad Manuel.</p><p>Finally, we offer special thanks to Alex Enxuto, Christopher Herpel, David Coletta, Jafet Arrieta, Jill Duncan, Johanna Figueroa, and Sara Valentin, and colleagues at the British Medical Journal, who dedicated countless hours to the development of this year&rsquo;s program and this supplement so that we might feature...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.acknowledgements</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.acknowledgements</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Acknowledgements]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Acknowledgements</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>Aii</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>Aii</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A1-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[1 GenAI & QI...together at last]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A1-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>When ChatGPT took the world by storm in late 2022, transformation and automation of every work process seemed imminent. Yet it has been nearly 2.5 years and only limited changes have impacted healthcare delivery to date. Why is that and what will unlock the potential of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies to truly transform how we practice in healthcare? This session explores how generative AI can enable quality and safety systems to overcome persistent challenges of scale and sustainability. Along with technology demonstration from health system leaders that shows exactly how such technologies could change our work, the session also explores how quality improvement (QI) skills will help genAI technologies take root and have maximal impact. GenAI and QI need each other. The session will share insights from multiple systems applying genAI tools to power their quality systems and will illustrate how those systems leverage QI differently to help these novel technologies take effect. Specific examples will include a focus on quality measurement, registry reporting, care gap closure, and safety monitoring tools that are reshaping how we practice quality today.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mate, K., Henwood, P., Jalon, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.1</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[1 GenAI & QI...together at last]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A1</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A1-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2 How can AI support quality management: practical guidance for quality leaders]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A1-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>This session highlights the results of an Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) 90-day Innovation cycle exploring the implications of artificial intelligence (AI) for quality and safety in healthcare, particularly in quality management. Inputs included a comprehensive literature scan; collaborative design with experts; and validation with the Leadership Alliance&rsquo;s AI Accelerator.</p><p>Key findings highlight the potential of AI tools to support quality management, address common failure nodes, and improve data interpretation. We map various AI tools to two complementary quality management approaches: IHI&rsquo;s Whole System Quality framework and the Care Operating System (CareOS) method. The research highlights the importance of rigorous measurement, data collection, and multidisciplinary governance to ensure responsible AI tool adoption, and offers guidance in these areas. We also offer test assessment criteria for AI tools for quality and safety leaders and parameters for the use of AI tools in quality planning cycles.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rakover, J., Jones, J., Barker, P., Renton, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.2</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.2</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2 How can AI support quality management: practical guidance for quality leaders]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A1</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A1-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3 Prescribing health through home improvements: reducing cost by investing in home repairs]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A1-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>Seventy one percent of homes in Brownsville, NY have hazards to health and safety and Brownsville has the lowest life expectancy in New York City (76 years). Community Action for Health Homes (CAHH), an initiative of United for Brownsville, partnered with United Health and local health care providers to prescribe home improvements for better health. For an average of $2,600 per home--the approximate cost of one emergency department (ED) visit-- CAHH improved the lives of residents allowing storage and preparation of food, usable bathrooms, fire and structural safety, and proper ventilation. After this investment, residents on average experienced a 26% reduction in physician costs, a 9% reduction in ED visit costs, a 13% reduction in physician visits, and a 13% reduction in prescription costs. Through this partnership between a healthcare payer, healthcare providers, and a local trusted community-based organization, CAHH decreased healthcare costs and service utilization, gained the trust of local residents enabling further exploration of additional benefit optimization, and enabled residents to feel safe and healthy in their homes. This session will explore how this partnership developed, the results achieved (p&lt;0.05) and thoughts for how to expand and adopt this approach.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wiley, S., Martin, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.3</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.3</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3 Prescribing health through home improvements: reducing cost by investing in home repairs]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A1</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A1-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4 Empowering nurses to address challenges for multi-visit patient (MVP) readmissions]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A1-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Methods</st><p>The project focused on assessment of patients with 10+ visits (MVPs) to the Emergency Center (ER) within a rolling 12 months. This closer evaluation of MVPs ensured post discharge care plans were developed and followed up on. In April 2024, we captured the voice of the customer through surveys and Gemba walks, mapping the &lsquo;as-is&rsquo; process. Facility senior leadership played crucial roles in frontline engagement throughout the project. By January 2025, using the new Epic system, the team had successfully implemented robust care processes, and create a dashboard providing real-time analytics to identify appropriate MVP action plans. A reduction in ER utilization and readmissions will continue to play a crucial role in improving Memorial Hermann Vizient rankings as the system transforms services and delivers high-quality, reliable and value-based care (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>).</p></sec><sec><st>Results and Implications</st><p>The baseline data (March 2023 - February 2024) showed 17% (36% Site #1, 28% Site #2) of readmitted patients were identified as MVPs. Of those readmitted from Oct 2023-Sept 2024, the top drivers of utilization (DOUs) were: Inadequate plan for recurrent issue (46%); and Inadequate supports and services (28%).</p><p>DOU completion rate (10/5/24 - 3/31/25) was 34% (Site #1) and 34% (Site #2).</p><p>% Readmission from MVP (10/5/24 - 3/31/25) was 10% (Site #1) and 9% (Site #2) (<cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>).</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 4 Figure 1</no><link locator="4_F1"></fig></p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 4 Table 1</no><link locator="4_T1"></tbl></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sano, R., Vo, A., Khan, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.4</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.4</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4 Empowering nurses to address challenges for multi-visit patient (MVP) readmissions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A2</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A4-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[7 Aligning surgical plans with healthcare goals in our frail, older adult patients]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A4-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>Older patients often undergo morbid and invasive surgeries despite the presence of frailty and cognitive impairment, which increases the risk for post-operative complications such as delirium and hospital-acquired debility. These complications rarely align with patients&rsquo; health goals, leaving them worse off than their pre-surgical state. Comprehensive geriatric assessment offers a way to evaluate older adults before surgery, and address topics such as polypharmacy, cognitive impairment, frailty, and goals of care. The Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) Geriatric Transitions of Care clinic uses the 4Ms framework to identify patients at risk for poor cognitive and functional outcomes while there is still time to intervene. Baseline cognitive and mobility assessments are performed, as well as medication reconciliations. Recommendations are provided to the patient and surgical team to make the procedure safer, such as de-prescribing harmful medications, completing physical therapy, and sometimes foregoing surgery altogether if in the patient&rsquo;s best interest. This is an early-stage pilot project, and we anticipate having preliminary data by Fall 2025. We hypothesize that this work will provide frail patients at risk for post-operative complications with essential tools to mitigate risks ahead of time and align goals of care with treatment options.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brooks, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.7</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.7</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[7 Aligning surgical plans with healthcare goals in our frail, older adult patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A4</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A4</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A4-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[8 Artificial intelligence as a mediator of experience]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A4-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>The prospect of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in health care offers new opportunities, and new perils, to patients and caregivers. One aspect of AI that is not mentioned in the dialogue between AI proponents and adversaries is the impact of AI use on human experience.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>We postulate the opportunities and effects of AI as a mediator of experience, defined as humans&rsquo; direct interactions with the world.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>By considering the ways in which AI changes the interaction of caregivers and patients with environments built to provide care, we assess novel opportunities where AI can mediate exposure to situations that sap development of human faculties. We also identify situations where AI has potential to rob humans of valuable development.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Current AI systems can potentially correct the toxic experience of route, meaningless data entry that is prevalent throughout healthcare. The downside, habituated use of AI to replace healthy struggle &ndash; in cases such as writing &ndash; can stunt the development of human skill and replace excellence with mediocrity.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>As a mediator of human interactions with the world, AI has the potential to help, or harm, our development as individuals and the insights we gain.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leslie, R., Nystrom, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.8</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.8</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[8 Artificial intelligence as a mediator of experience]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A4</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A5</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A6-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[10 Addressing maternal mortality and morbidity inequities through QI and anti-racism in England]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A6-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>Over the past 18 months, the National Health Service (NHS) Race &amp; Health Observatory (RHO) and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) partnered with 10 NHS Trusts in England to form the Learning and Action Network. This initiative applied RHO&rsquo;s seven anti-racism principles using the Model for Improvement to tackle inequities in maternal and neonatal care. The Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ) was adapted to embed these principles and serve as an evaluation framework. This work led to a novel approach for addressing racial inequities through improvement science.</p><p>Case studies from the Network will highlight the practical use of these tools in efforts to reduce racial disparities in postpartum hemorrhage, maternal mental health, gestational diabetes, and preterm birth. Findings from the independent evaluation using the adapted MUSIQ framework will show the impact of these initiatives.</p><p>Session participants will explore the development and use of the integrated model and MUSIQ framework, learn how to apply them to address racial inequities, and assess improvement efforts through an anti-racist lens. A structured discussion will encourage reflection on using these tools across clinical areas and inform recommendations for broader application.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chowdhury, M., Bolender, T., Aryasinghe, S., Parisi, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.10</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.10</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[10 Addressing maternal mortality and morbidity inequities through QI and anti-racism in England]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A6</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A6</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A6-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[11 An ROI framework for high-risk programs that will get finance and clinical leaders on board]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A6-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>To provide sustainable, quality care, health systems must design interventions to support high-utilizing patients. Demonstrating the return on investment (ROI) and return on health (ROH) of these programs to leaders with competing priorities is crucial.</p><p>Our simple approach to calculate ROI and ROH focuses on avoidable Emergency Department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and length of stay (LOS), keeping patients healthier and enhancing access for lower cost and more highly reimbursed visits. Participants will practice this framework through a simulation.</p><p>Working with finance, we found that ED visits and hospitalizations by high-risk patients had a lower average contribution margin and net revenue compared to the general patient population, and used this cost differential as a multiplier to estimate cost savings.</p><p>We assessed the ROI of a care pathway for Chronic Kidney Disease and Heart Failure, projecting a total annual increase in contribution margin of $1.15 million and a net gain of $857,000 related to a 10% reduction in avoidable visits and 0.5 reduction in LOS when those beds are backfilled with patients from the general population.</p><p>This framework is an approachable method to make a financial and clinical case for high-risk programs. Working in close collaboration with our finance team helped achieve executive buy-in.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McGlynn, G., Gupta, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.11</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.11</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[11 An ROI framework for high-risk programs that will get finance and clinical leaders on board]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A6</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A6</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A6-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[12 Building stronger medical homes: implementing a sustainable team-based care model in primary care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A6-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>Delivering sustainable, team-based care in publicly funded primary care systems requires more than clinical integration&mdash;it demands executive leadership, strategic infrastructure, and a culture of collaboration between central networks and community-based medical homes. The Edmonton O-day&rsquo;min Primary Care Network&rsquo;s (EOPCN) Resource in Clinic (RIC) Program provides a replicable model for how system-level leadership can drive scalable, high-impact quality improvement.</p><p>This session explores the design, implementation, and evolution of the RIC Program, which places EOPCN-employed multidisciplinary staff&mdash;including nurses, specialist navigators, and practice facilitators&mdash;directly into member clinics. Resources are allocated based on transparent criteria tied to provider panel size and clinic readiness, supporting equity, accountability, and alignment with the Patient&rsquo;s Medical Home model. With over two years of implementation, the program has demonstrated improvements in access, care coordination, and clinic efficiency.</p><p>Led by the CEO of EOPCN, a credentialed evaluator and healthcare executive, this session provides actionable strategies for quality leaders and system executives seeking to advance multidisciplinary team-based care in resource-constrained, publicly funded settings.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brower, K., Khera, S., Tomcej, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.12</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.12</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[12 Building stronger medical homes: implementing a sustainable team-based care model in primary care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A6</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A6</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A7-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[13 Cultural competence is a 2-way street; peer support specialists in a carceral setting]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A7-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>Prison health care is notorious for dysfunctional organization, limited resources, lack of health care standards, and poor health outcomes despite being the only population in the U.S. with a constitutional right to health care. California Prison Health Care services was taken over by a Federal Receiver in 2006, which has improved many of these issues. Despite these changes, distrust and miscommunication continue to affect health care outcomes. San Quentin Rehabilitation Center (SQRC) has hired 30 Peer Support Specialists (PSS) and has created several initiatives to work with our most frustrating health care issues at the facility.</p><p>At SQRC, many of the Peer Support Specialists were hired as a continuation of a literacy program. PSS have been able to translate the distrust and logistics not imagined with usual quality improvement (QI) projects for communication around all the consequences of health care decisions. As an example, through holding educational town halls, small groups and individual contacts with incarcerated persons (IPs) in one housing unit, the PSS were able to increase the percentage of IPs with completed Advance Directives from 8% to 26% over 8 months while other housing units saw little to no gains. Additionally, PSS translate the health care goals for the consumers so they can understand the perspectives and needs of the health care staff. PSS are able to identify creative and resource limited solutions to many of our strategies. A PSSP program can easily be generalized for all health care organizations, particularly those who serve underserved populations.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tootell, E., Pachynski, A., Clutchette, C., Wharton, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.13</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.13</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[13 Cultural competence is a 2-way street; peer support specialists in a carceral setting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A7</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A7</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A7-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[14 Dynamic discourse: the percentage vs percentile debate in quality improvement]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A7-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>Performance measurement plays a critical role in shaping processes and outcomes in healthcare quality. Measuring performance using percentages vs percentiles has broad implications for patients, providers, organizations, payers, and the health care industry. Each metric emphasizes different performance aspects, influencing how quality improvement is defined and pursued.</p><p>This work aims to define key concepts of percentages and percentiles in healthcare quality, evaluate their pros and cons, explore real-world applications, and identify best practices for their use in various settings.</p><p>Through IHI&rsquo;s Dynamic Discourse Series, leaders from diverse systems and roles engaged in structured discussions on the use, interpretation, and implications of percentage vs percentile use. These dialogues were supported by a review of relevant literature and comparative analysis of current practices across health systems.</p><p>A practical framework was developed to guide when and how each method should be used to meet the needs of different stakeholder groups, emphasizing the contextual strengths of each approach.</p><p>Thoughtful application of percentage vs percentile is vital for aligning performance measurement with strategic goals. Attendees will gain actionable insights to improve benchmarking, goal-setting, and feedback in quality improvement.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weckman, A., Birnbaum, N., Azar, K., Silver, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.14</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.14</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[14 Dynamic discourse: the percentage vs percentile debate in quality improvement]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A7</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A7</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A7-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[15 Fostering sustainable community-based care through cross-sector partnership]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A7-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>Improving community health is vital to the missions of both Fairview Health Services and UnitedHealth Group. While there are differences in every community, our community initiatives are informed and powered by data analysis and community insights and participation.</p><p>This analysis and insight revealed some of the biggest challenges affecting community members in St. Paul are food insecurity and associated health conditions, such as diabetes and hypertension, especially in communities experiencing poverty. There is a need for a financially sustainable and collaborative approach that incorporates the social drivers of health and leverages community assets while reducing partner fragmentation to drive better health.</p><p>UnitedHealth Group, Fairview, The Good Acre, and The Food Group partnered on a model that convenes community stakeholders to co-create tailored interventions that improve health and social outcomes while ensuring sustainability through integration into the care delivery system.</p><p>All partners contributed to the results and insights gathered through a measurement framework to represent the collective impact of all community partners.</p><p>We&rsquo;ll detail results and show how fostering diverse cross-sector partnerships is essential to driving innovative solutions for sustainable community-based care.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Montwill, L., Letts, J., Hill, T., Richardson, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.15</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.15</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[15 Fostering sustainable community-based care through cross-sector partnership]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A7</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A7</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A7-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[16 From chaos to clarity: a standardized data framework to prevent workplace violence in health care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A7-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Workplace violence (WPV) in healthcare continues to jeopardize the safety and well-being of healthcare workers and negatively impact patient care. Despite increased prevention efforts, the lack of standardization in workplace violence data collection and measurement hinders progress in predicting, preventing, and addressing these events.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>This session aims to present best practice recommendations for a standardized WPV data and measurement structure that enables better analysis, targeted action, and cross-organizational collaboration to reduce WPV incidents.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A comprehensive literature review, expert interviews, and guidance from a multidisciplinary expert panel and industry partners informed the development of a workplace violence data and measurement framework.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The resulting recommendations establish a foundational framework to guide organizations in collecting, analyzing, and applying WPV incident data. This structure supports proactive decision-making and fosters consistency across healthcare systems.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Attendees will gain actionable insights to strengthen their WPV data strategies. Implementing standardized measurement practices can accelerate efforts to predict, prevent, and respond to WPV&mdash;ultimately enhancing safety for the healthcare workforce.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weckman, A., Boord, J., Lipscomb, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.16</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.16</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[16 From chaos to clarity: a standardized data framework to prevent workplace violence in health care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A7</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A8</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A9-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[18 Hardwiring human factors into healthcare: engineering solutions at the point of care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A9-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>There is a need for structured collaborations that embed human factors (HF) principles directly into healthcare delivery systems to improve outcomes. The University of Toronto&rsquo;s Centre for Healthcare Engineering (CHE) and William Osler Health System (Osler) launched Ontario&rsquo;s first Academic Practice Partnership (APP) focused on integrating HF into acute care settings to enhance patient safety, efficiency, and innovation.</p><p>The APP involves three pillars:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Education: Developing placement pathways for engineering students</p></li><li><p>Practice: Integrating HF into patient safety and innovation initiatives</p></li><li><p>Research: Establishing new research opportunities</p></li></l></p><p>Early outcomes include: </p><p>implementation of dedicated student placements in clinical environments, initiation of joint research projects addressing critical issues, and enhanced professional development opportunities for staff.</p><p>Structured, interdisciplinary collaborations can effectively bridge the gap between HF theory and clinical practice. Key lessons include establishing clear frameworks for student engagement, fostering mutual understanding and respect in teams, and prioritizing translation of research findings.</p><p>The APP serves as a model for integrating HF into healthcare, highlighting the potential for such partnerships to drive meaningful improvements in patient care, quality, and safety.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alfred, M., Mazhar, K., Rivera, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.18</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.18</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[18 Hardwiring human factors into healthcare: engineering solutions at the point of care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A9</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A9</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A9-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[19 Healing the system: the future of fluid stewardship: driving safer, smarter care at scale]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A9-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>Intravenous (IV) fluid therapy is essential in acute care, but inappropriate use can lead to patient harm, waste, and excess cost. At Novant Health, a multi-state healthcare system, a systemwide review identified major opportunities to improve fluid management. In 18 months, over 3 million fluid bags were purchased&mdash;normal saline accounted for more than half, and costly albumin was administered 6,000+ times in 2023, with only 24% meeting evidence-based criteria. This, along with risks such as pulmonary edema and renal dysfunction, highlighted the need for action&mdash;especially during a national shortage following Hurricane Helene. In response, Novant Health launched a systemwide fluid stewardship initiative through its Precision Clinical Variation Reduction Program. Strategies included standardizing order sets, embedding decision support in the electronic health record (HER), categorizing albumin use, and engaging clinical teams. Results show evidence-based albumin use rose from 45.4% to 87.8%, saving $76,000 and improving care for 326 patients. IV fluid cost savings exceeded $200,000 in just four months. Real-time dashboards and iterative Plan, Study, Do, Act (PDSA) cycles supported rapid scale-up. This program demonstrates how structured, data-driven stewardship can improve safety, outcomes, and cost-efficiency while building resilient clinical systems.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Woodard, A., Feinstein, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.19</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.19</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[19 Healing the system: the future of fluid stewardship: driving safer, smarter care at scale]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A9</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A10</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A11-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[21 Investing in housing to improve health in communities across the country]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A11-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>The U.S. is short 7 million rental homes to meet needs of low-income households. The housing crisis poses significant health and wellbeing risks. The benefits of a safe, quality home are well documented, and the location of a home can improve access to important community resources.</p><p>Increasing access to affordable housing is a critical element to reducing health disparities.</p><p>Since 2011, UnitedHealth Group (UHG) has helped build and preserve affordable and mixed income housing developments in 31 states and the District of Columbia for people in need of housing and supportive services. These investments have helped create more than 25,000 homes for people facing housing insecurity.</p><p>Stewards for Affordable Health for the Future (SAHF) welcomes private sector funding to develop and rehabilitate affordable housing and build out community resources. Through the SAHF and UHG partnership, housing stability was enhanced by accompanying health and social services.</p><p>Supportive services made available on-site at affordable housing developments have contributed to improved health outcomes.</p><p>Given the interconnectedness of housing and health, the private sector has an incentive to be a strong supporter of housing programs at the federal, state and local levels, as well as being a supporter of developing cross-sector partnerships that are critical to the sustainability of the programs.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tanner, J., Billioux, A., Nassau-Brownstone, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.21</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.21</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[21 Investing in housing to improve health in communities across the country]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A11</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A11</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A11-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[22 Is quality improvement enough? Why we also need methods for deep, systemic change in healthcare]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A11-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>Across the globe, there is almost universal agreement that big change is needed in healthcare systems. How do we make it happen? Top-down system reform only takes us so far. We cannot &lsquo;redesign&rsquo; our way to transformation just by changing the explicit structures and money flows. Most change and improvement methods we use are designed for small scale continuous improvement. This leaves a gap in terms of how we enable a different, more radical kind of change - based on different change methods, with high involvement and high participation approaches, new relationships and a recalibration of the dynamic between service users and providers. We will hear from leaders of the healthcare improvement movement from the English NHS and a Swedish County Council who have taken up this challenge in practice in big healthcare systems. They will cover:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Why new thinking and practice is needed</p></li><li><p>Incremental, quantitative change vs. disruptive, qualitative change</p></li><li><p>How do we get to a different future?</p></li></l></p><p>We will engage the whole room to debate and develop these principles through &lsquo;catalyst conversations&rsquo;. Each table will have a different topic related to aspects of the change approach. Participants can join their conversation of choice. We will utilize the wisdom of the room to further build radical change methods to be tested in healthcare practice.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bevan, H., Henriks, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.22</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.22</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[22 Is quality improvement enough? Why we also need methods for deep, systemic change in healthcare]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A11</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A12</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A12-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[23 Mitigating maternal mortality: implementing an innovative approach for electronic case reviews]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A12-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>The current maternal mortality review process lacks structure for tracking preventable events, identifying trends, and facilitating quality improvement, hindering efficient analysis of pregnancy-related mortality risks. The project aims to implement a standardized, evidence-based case review tool within an electronic platform to improve identification of preventable events and inform clinical decision-making. Objectives include enhancing the review process with additional evidence-based questions, transitioning to a standardized electronic platform, and conducting a retrospective review of regional maternal mortality cases to identify preventability factors and practice improvement opportunities. Using Kotter&rsquo;s Change Theory and the Model for Improvement, cases were reviewed in an electronic database using a new form. Results showed a 100% review rate, capturing preventability and chances to alter outcomes in eligible cases. Implications include improved efficiency, standardization of care, and empowering clinicians to implement evidence-based practices and safety bundles, advancing nursing practice, healthcare policy, and maternal health outcomes.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elks, L., Shaffer, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.23</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.23</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[23 Mitigating maternal mortality: implementing an innovative approach for electronic case reviews]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A12</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A12</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A12-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[24 Mitigating wildfire health impacts through data-driven strategies and population health approach]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A12-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Climate change has intensified the frequency and intensity of wildfires, contributing to significant health risks, especially for patients with respiratory conditions. Wildfire smoke contains fine particulate matter that exacerbates Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and asthma, increasing emergency visits and hospitalizations. Our health system recognized the need for proactive intervention using a data-driven, population health strategy to mitigate these risks.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Identify at-risk patients during wildfire events using clinical and environmental data. Deliver timely, tailored health education to prevent avoidable respiratory complications.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A multidisciplinary team developed an alert system based on electronic health and environmental data. Patients with COPD or asthma, living near wildfires and in high Air Quality Index (AQI) zones, received alerts via a secure portal. Messages included health tips, do it yourself (DIY) air filter guidance, and emergency readiness resources.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Since 2023, the system has triggered 356 wildfire poor air quality alerts. Patient feedback indicates greater awareness and preparedness.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Implications</st><p>This model demonstrates how health systems can leverage real-time data to protect vulnerable populations from environmental hazards, supporting better outcomes and system resilience in the face of climate change.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kuhn, B., Gupta, R., Craddock, K., Fan, W.-H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.24</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.24</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[24 Mitigating wildfire health impacts through data-driven strategies and population health approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A12</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A12</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A12-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[25 One size wont fit all: designing AI for real-world health care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A12-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming the health care landscape, offering the promise for enhancing operational efficiency, clinical decision-making, and overall quality of care. Despite this momentum, many health care organizations lack practical guidance for implementing AI responsibly and effectively.</p><p>The goal of this AI Accelerator work group was to explore the current state of health care AI and identify pragmatic and responsible AI best practices tailored to the diverse needs of hospitals and health care systems.</p><p>Leaders from a diverse group of U.S. health care systems convened to explore the current state of AI within their organizations, share insights, identify best practices, and co-develop a patient-centered framework for responsible and effective AI governance and implementation.</p><p>Through collaborative discussions, the group identified key strategies that were synthesized into a foundational framework for AI implementation in health care that aligns AI adoption with clinical and operational goals.</p><p>As AI adoption accelerates, health systems face growing pressure to deploy these technologies safely, effectively, and ethically. This session will share real-world insights and actionable strategies to support responsible AI implementation and offer a pathway to harness AI&rsquo;s potential while ensuring safe and reliable care.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weckman, A., Moran, B., Binkley, C., Zier, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.25</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.25</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[25 One size wont fit all: designing AI for real-world health care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A12</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A12</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A13-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[26 Orchestrating quality excellence: a strategic management model for multi-hospital health systems]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A13-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>This initiative showcases how strategic reorganization of quality management across a 17-campus health system established a robust governance framework for quality improvement. Implementing a hierarchical committee structure with clearly defined domains and an innovative QUAD leadership model&mdash;integrating quality, physician, nursing/operations, and process improvement leaders&mdash;has driven notable progress within the first year.</p><p>Supported by dedicated analytics and monitoring teams ensuring data integrity and regulatory compliance, the system achieved significant improvements from FY2023 to FY2024: a 17% reduction in mortality index, a 23% decrease in the Patient Safety and Adverse Events Composite (PSI-90) score, and a 9% decline in hospital-acquired infections.</p><p>All five management groups are fully staffed and operational under the QUAD model, with 24 taskforces launched, each with clear charters and metrics. Standardized reporting and system-wide dashboards enable real-time quality monitoring, demonstrating how effective governance can accelerate measurable improvement across a complex health system.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bobokalonova, Z., Chang, P., Sisk, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.26</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.26</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[26 Orchestrating quality excellence: a strategic management model for multi-hospital health systems]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A13</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A13</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A13-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[27 People centered kind leaders]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A13-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>The mental, physical, spiritual, and social wellbeing of healthcare professionals has deteriorated substantially over the past decades as occupational stress (i.e., burnout, moral distress, work-life disintegration) has increased.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>To present a blueprint to cultivate optimal professional wellbeing via systems, culture, policies, and behaviors characterized by kindness (Kindness is helping others do better.).</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A literature review of 387 peer-reviewed articles regarding the interrelationships of kindness, occupational health, and leadership was performed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>54 occupational health determinants were identified and categorized into four domains:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Agency</p></li><li><p>Collective Effervescence</p></li><li><p>Belongingness</p></li><li><p>Positivity</p></li></l></p><p>Four practical, validated and evidence-based leader actions that improve occupational health were identified:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Listen-Sort-Empower</p></li><li><p>Life Crafting</p></li><li><p>Commensality</p></li><li><p>Five Kindness Behaviors</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>People Centered Kind Leader actions can substantially improve the mental, physical, spiritual, and social wellbeing of the healthcare professionals and the experience, quality, safety, and cost of the patients they have the privilege of serving.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Swensen, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.27</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.27</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[27 People centered kind leaders]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A13</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A13</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A13-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[28 Reducing 30-day readmission rates: a patient centered tool]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A13-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>High Readmission rates are associated with clinical and financial consequences as well as worse healthcare outcomes for our patients, with the average cost estimated at $15,200. The medicine units at Stanford had a 17.3% average readmission rate, higher than Academic Medical Center averages. Evaluation indicated multiple gaps in transitions of care (TOC) as well as minimal patient involvement in comprehension.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>We aim to improve the medicine unit 17.3% average readmission rate, by a relative 3% and improve the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHP) score by 5% by utilization of a &lsquo;Discharge Planner&rsquo; by August 2025.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Hospitalists were surveyed, who indicated &gt;50% of readmissions were felt to be due to a lack of transitions of care. A multidisciplinary team was founded who applied improvement methodology to find gaps in TOC. This was combined with the survey learning to make a &lsquo;Discharge Planner&rsquo;; A patient facing document that serves as a learning tool, and reference with the goal of improving this transition of care.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Readmissions on pilot units had a 9.4% reduced readmission rate (RRR) compared to other medicine units.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Patient involvement and understanding of discharge with a simple checklist and comprehension confirmation can improve readmissions. This is an area ripe for electronic medical record (EMR) automation and leveraging technology to reduce active review my medical professionals.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Auda, G., Shieh, L., Tran, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.28</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.28</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[28 Reducing 30-day readmission rates: a patient centered tool]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A13</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A13</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A13-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[29 Reliability redefined: integrating safety frameworks and just culture for sustained success]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A13-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>The integration of High Reliability organizing and a Just Culture framework is essential to achieve and sustain optimal patient outcomes. Safety culture is ineffective without a &lsquo;Just&rsquo; culture to support it. Trinity Health Grand Rapids (THGR) deliberately aligned high reliability with a system of workplace justice to achieve a sustainable culture of safety and care excellence (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figures 1</cross-ref> and <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">2</cross-ref>). Safety culture survey data highlighted the need to build trust, psychological safety, and a healthy reporting culture to reduce harm (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F3">figures 3</cross-ref> and <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F4">4</cross-ref>). Utilizing a strategic high reliability roadmap aligned with Just Culture principles and methods, THGR realized improved staff perceptions of safety and consistent safety behavior practices, leading to noteworthy harm and claims reductions (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figures 2</cross-ref> and <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F5">5</cross-ref>). Rethinking our approach to safety was critical following a period of backsliding. Senior leaders reflected on the importance of a Just Culture leading to increased ownership, investment and a renewed partnership between clinical and HR leadership. With justice as a core tenet, we have a stronger and more sustainable reliability roadmap aligned with our core values. Bottom line: Without a culture committed to workplace justice, safety science remains theoretical. We are now a system that not only thinks reliably but acts justly.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 29 Figure 1</no><caption><p>THGR safety question pulse survey trends October 2022&ndash;February 2025</p></caption><link locator="29_F1"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 29 Figure 2</no><caption><p>THGR serious safety event rate January 2021&ndash;March 2025</p></caption><link locator="29_F2"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F3"><no>Abstract 29 Figure 3</no><caption><p>THGR rate of events reported per 1,000 adjusted patient days</p></caption><link locator="29_F3"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F4"><no>Abstract 29 Figure 4</no><caption><p>THGR average rolling and monthly events reported</p></caption><link locator="29_F4"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F5"><no>Abstract 29 Figure 5</no><caption><p>THGR claims reduction trend 2017&ndash;2024</p></caption><link locator="29_F5"></fig></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Farmer, K., Dayton, M., Pena, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.29</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.29</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[29 Reliability redefined: integrating safety frameworks and just culture for sustained success]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A13</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A15</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A16-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[31 Scaling what works: a pragmatic approach to reducing clinical variation and improving outcomes]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A16-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Health systems have long pursued Clinical Variation Reduction (CVR) to improve costs and outcomes, yet many efforts fall short by targeting isolated projects rather than driving systemic change. Financial pressures and staff shortages contribute to and amplify the urgency for effective CVR. To achieve sustainment and scale, health systems must build strategic partnerships, balance enterprise-wide standardization with local flexibility, and embed proven practices into organizational culture.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Leverage data to identify and prioritize high-variation, high-impact opportunities</p></li><li><p>Engage multidisciplinary stakeholders through structured governance and shared decision-making</p></li><li><p>Integrate evidence-based practices into care with workflow and technology optimization</p></li><li><p>Establish system level, patient-centric care standards with local level implementation flexibility</p></li><li><p>Supporting teams with coaching, workflow redesign, and performance data</p></li><li><p>Develop and execute a strategy to scale and embed CVR into clinical teams, moving from isolated projects to system-wide integration</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The enterprise-wide clinical variation reduction program resulted in significant impacts in the first two years such as: 19.2% relative mortality reduction and 0.03 LOS O/E reduction in ED boarding patients, reduced long-stay observation rates from 24.6% to 14.7%, eliminated 185,000 unnecessary daily labs, reduced 11,084 unnecessary antibiotic days, increased documented evidence-based albumin ordering rates from 10.1% to an average of 80.25%, and corresponding financial impacts across the portfolio of initiatives.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>CVR in large systems is achievable through strategic partnerships and embedding proven methods into culture&mdash;driving better outcomes and lower costs. Attendees will leave with practical insights and tools to accelerate CVR in their own organizations.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Corbett, C., Roetger, A., Woodard, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.31</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.31</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[31 Scaling what works: a pragmatic approach to reducing clinical variation and improving outcomes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A16</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A16</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A16-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[32 Staying the course: discussions on maintaining a commitment to health equity]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A16-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>In the current cultural and political climate commitments to diversity, equity, and inclusion are coming under intense scrutiny&mdash;with some organizations facing potential significant consequences. This poses an increased concern for health care organizations that have invested in equitable outcomes for the populations they serve. Many organizations are unsure of how to maintain their commitment to health equity and are actively seeking best practices. This session will bring together organizations with a commitment to health equity to share best practices for maintaining this commitment.</p><p>In this session, we aim to help participants</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Discuss different strategies for maintaining a commitment to health equity.</p></li><li><p>Identify key practices to help navigate organizational equity conversations</p></li><li><p>Begin to outline key components of organizational equity strategy</p></li></l></p><p>This session will help participants connect with other health care organizations focused on equity and outline next steps and strategies as they continue to serve the needs of their communities.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Imbeah, K., Burnett, C., Haynes, K., Echo-Hawk, A., Smedley, B., Glover, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.32</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.32</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[32 Staying the course: discussions on maintaining a commitment to health equity]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A16</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A17</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A17-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[33 Stronger together: bold partnerships for a resilient behavioral health ecosystem in California]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A17-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Description</st><p>California&rsquo;s behavioral health landscape is at a turning point&mdash;demand is rising, systems are stretched, and the need for cross-system collaboration has never been greater.</p><p>This session explores how state and county health plans are forging innovative alliances to address complex behavioral health challenges. We will spotlight real-world examples of how diverse stakeholders&mdash;including health systems, behavioral health providers, social services, and lived experience advocates&mdash;are working together to expand access, coordinate care, and drive equity.</p><p>During the 14-month Demonstration Collaborative, California Managed Care Plans (MCPs) and County Behavioral Health Plans (BHPs) joined forces to test change and achieved significant progress in three drivers of improvement including; 1) strengthen relationships and build trust between county BHPs and MCPs, 2) clarify and improve data collection and exchange capabilities, and 3) move to data-driven action with partners.</p><p>Participants will learn about practical strategies for aligning goals across agencies, navigating data barriers, and building trust in historically siloed environments. This session is ideal for leaders and practitioners looking to strengthen their behavioral health networks and build systems that are truly collaborative, patient-centered, and sustainable.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jackson, A., McCall, J., Marrero, L., Burt, S., Conaway, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.33</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.33</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[33 Stronger together: bold partnerships for a resilient behavioral health ecosystem in California]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A17</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A17</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A17-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[34 Californias approach to operationalizing medicaid transformation: regional collaboratives to build capacity and coordination among community-based organizations]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_4/A17-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Since January 2022, California&rsquo;s Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) has been implementing CalAIM to integrate social care with Medicaid services, funded by the Section 1115 waiver and other state and federal resources. Core programs include Enhanced Care Management (ECM) and Community Supports, which deliver nonmedical services, such as housing supports, respite and personal care, and peer supports. Community-based organizations (CBOs) were contracted; however, many were new to sophisticated data-sharing practices, Medicaid billing, and growing client volume.</p><p>To address these challenges, DHCS created regional collaboratives, known as the CalAIM Providing Access and Transforming Health (PATH) Collaborative Planning and Implementation (CPI) initiative. HC2 Strategies and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) facilitate nine of the 25 collaboratives, all of which are overseen by third-party administrator Public Consulting Group (PCG).</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>The regional collaboratives aim to...</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Build provider capability and capacity to deliver high-quality ECM and Community Support services; and</p></li><li><p>Strengthen coordination and collaboration among system actors, including community-based organizations, hospitals and clinics, managed care plans, county agencies, and tribal entities.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The HC2-IHI team implements a comprehensive set of networking and capacity-building activities. At the regional level, monthly collaborative calls and tri-annual in-person meetings focus on building relationships, strengthening governance of the coordination network, and assessing local assets and gaps to guide action. Representatives from 15&ndash;40 local organizations attend each meeting, depending on region size.</p><p>Statewide virtual activities facilitate sharing of best practices and deliver technical content on topics such as co-locating at clinical sites, billing and coding, and multi-sector case conferencing. Monthly statewide activities facilitated by HC2-IHI reach an average of 250 local leaders per month. A robust measurement and learning system ensures facilitation is targeted to participant needs, best practices from one region are scaled to others, and key learnings are escalated to DHCS.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Average Community Support services utilization among Medi-Cal members in participating counties increased sixfold, from 0.28% in Q1 2023 to 1.70% in Q1 2025. ECM utilization tripled over the same period, rising from 0.3% to 1.0%. Collaboratives are one of multiple supports provided by DHCS, so a direct causal link cannot be established, but as of September 2025, 81% of participants in HC2-IHI collaboratives report increased knowledge of services, 79% report confidence to implement ECM and Community Supports, and 72% are confident in their ability to sustain progress into 2026 and beyond.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>As funding for collaboratives concludes in 2026, we are transferring facilitation strategies and resources to local leadership so that high-quality, coordinated services continue to benefit California Medi-Cal members into the future.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Turner, E., Barilla, D., Memmo, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T06:45:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-IHI2.34</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-IHI2.34</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[34 Californias approach to operationalizing medicaid transformation: regional collaboratives to build capacity and coordination among community-based organizations]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral Presentation (OP) Abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A17</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A17</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003933?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving adherence to appropriate use criteria for paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: a three-cycle quality improvement project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003933?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The appropriate use criteria (AUC) developed by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) provide evidence-based guidance for managing paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHFs), yet adherence varies widely in clinical practice. This quality improvement project aimed to improve the rate of &lsquo;appropriate&rsquo; management for paediatric SCHF at a tertiary referral centre in Egypt by systematically implementing the AAOS AUC through a structured, multicycle intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a three-cycle plan&ndash;do&ndash;study&ndash;act quality improvement project at Mansoura University Emergency Hospital between January 2021 and May 2023, including all children under 18 years with acute SCHFs. Cycle 1 (n=58) established baseline adherence. Cycle 2 (n=62) implemented educational workshops and a departmental protocol. Cycle 3 (n=58) introduced reinforcement training, regular case discussions, visual reminders and individualised audit feedback. The primary outcome was the proportion of cases managed &lsquo;appropriately&rsquo; according to the AUC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 178 patients, appropriate management increased from 62.1% at baseline to 75.8% after initial education and 87.9% after reinforcement interventions, representing a 25.8% absolute improvement. Rarely appropriate management decreased from 19.0% to 3.4%. The greatest improvements occurred in Gartland type II fractures. Key baseline barriers included the lack of AUC awareness (78% of surgeons unfamiliar), absence of standardised protocols and variable surgeon preferences. Following sustained educational interventions and audit feedback, AUC tool utilisation increased from 45% to 95%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A phased quality improvement initiative combining education, protocolisation, reinforcement training and audit feedback significantly improved adherence to evidence-based guidelines for paediatric SCHFs. Sustained educational interventions with regular case-based discussions and individualised feedback are essential for long-term practice change. Organisational factors, particularly lack of awareness and inconsistent application of guidelines, represent the primary modifiable barriers to adherence.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Embaby, O., Mersal, M., Elalfy, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-31T14:00:28-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003933</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003933</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving adherence to appropriate use criteria for paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: a three-cycle quality improvement project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003933</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003933</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003606?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Implementation of Digital Consent at Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust: A Quality Improvement Project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003606?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Digital consent systems provide a modern alternative to traditional paper-based methods, improving legibility, documentation accuracy, compliance with National Health Service (NHS) medicolegal standards and patient understanding. This quality improvement project evaluated the implementation of a digital consent system in the Trauma and Orthopaedics department at Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, comparing paper-based consent with the digital system. Baseline data were collected retrospectively from July to August 2024 and compared with prospective data following implementation from August to October 2024, using quantitative measures of documentation quality and qualitative feedback from healthcare professionals (n=24) and patient (n=619) surveys. An iterative Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle approach was used to refine the process.</p>
<p>Following implementation, legibility improved from 42&ndash;48% to 100% across all digital consents, and documentation of alternative treatment options increased substantially from 5% to 95% in trauma cases and from 0% to 98% in elective cases. Risks and benefits were documented in 100% of digital consents. Patient and clinician surveys demonstrated high satisfaction, with a mean System Usability Score of 77.5, comparable to high-performing consumer technology platforms. Identified barriers included accessibility issues for less digitally literate patients and technical challenges such as digital signing on smaller devices. The transition to digital consent resulted in a cumulative cost saving of &pound;2552.90 over the first 7 months.</p>
<p>The introduction of digital consent significantly improved documentation quality, patient and clinician satisfaction and generated measurable cost savings. Ongoing challenges relating to accessibility and technical usability require targeted interventions. This project demonstrates the potential for digital consent systems to support efficient, sustainable and patient-centred care, with opportunities for broader adoption across NHS specialties.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elhariry, M., Dejsupa, C., Adlan, A., Richards, J., Li, M., Weekes, G., Khaleeq, T., Theivendran, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-30T09:08:13-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003606</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003606</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Implementation of Digital Consent at Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust: A Quality Improvement Project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003606</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003606</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003827?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Planetary health and environmentally sustainable healthcare: perceptions of primary care practitioners in Ireland - a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003827?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Human and planetary health are deeply interconnected and endangered by the triple planetary crisis: climate change, biodiversity loss and pollution. Despite proactive measures being pursued to reduce healthcare&rsquo;s overall environmental footprint, relatively few of these are directed at primary care, notwithstanding that it accounts for up to 25% of healthcare&rsquo;s ecological impact. Within Ireland&rsquo;s primary healthcare sector, despite a growing recognition of the importance of environmentally sustainable healthcare, little is known about the perspectives of those healthcare professionals (HCPs) working in the sector to delivering more environmentally sustainable primary care services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This qualitative descriptive study explored the knowledge and attitudes of community pharmacists, dentists, general practitioners and practice nurses working in primary care in Ireland, toward planetary health and sustainable healthcare. Semistructured interviews were conducted between May and September 2024 and analysed using inductive qualitative content analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Analysis of interviews (n=20) produced a broad range of insights which were consolidated into three higher order categories. Findings revealed that while HCPs recognised the importance of climate action, many felt unable to translate concern into practical change in primary care due to barriers such as a lack of knowledge, limited guidance and inadequate system-level supports. HCPs emphasised the need for targeted training, access to practical tools and clear leadership from the relevant stakeholders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study highlights the urgent need to shift from reliance on individual motivation to practice sustainably, to a coordinated public health response in Ireland. Achieving this requires educational and systemic changes, including supportive policy, incentivisation and practical sustainable interventions, to embed environmental sustainability into routine care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walsh, S. J., OLeary, A., Lynch, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-30T09:08:13-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003827</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003827</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Planetary health and environmentally sustainable healthcare: perceptions of primary care practitioners in Ireland - a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003827</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003827</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003728?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Opioid Room of Horrors: a simulation approach to strengthen drug administration safety]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003728?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and objectives</st>
<p>Medication administration errors (MAEs) are frequent and preventable. While the five rights (5R) rule and the double-check are standard practices for safe drug administration, incidents still occur. MAEs involving high-risk drugs such as opioids are a major concern, especially in older patients. To address this, a practical, error-driven training was developed through an opioid Room of Horrors (RoH) to reinforce the 5R rule and the double-check procedure and map risks within the opioid medication-use process, thereby improving the safety of opioid administration. The secondary objective was to evaluate participant satisfaction with the training.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>The opioid RoH integrates four errors and four hazards hidden in the opioid medication-use process. Participants, working in pairs, were asked to prepare and administer an opioid to a fictitious patient. Two assessors recorded the number of errors detected and hazards avoided. During the debriefing, assessors reviewed and explained these items to the pair of trainees combined with a refresh on the 5R rule and the double-check process. Detection and avoidance rates were analysed using descriptive statistics. Participants assessed the training through a satisfaction questionnaire.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 86 sessions were conducted, involving 172 participants including nurses, nurse assistants and physicians from a geriatric department. Participants detected errors such as wrong patient (60%), expired drugs (63%), incorrect strength or galenic form (55%) and documented allergy (55%), while most hazards were avoided, except for the correct device, which was used in only 65% of cases. Double-check performance was inefficient mainly focusing on the dose check. Satisfaction was high (9.2/10), and 73% of participants reported a knowledge gain.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The opioid RoH is an effective training to refresh and emphasise the rigorous application of the 5R rules and the double-check procedure to reduce MAEs. Additionally, this simulation showed persistent gaps such as patient identification and double-check failures, highlighting the need to strengthen safety practices through continuous training and institutional-level system improvements in medication administration safety.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hannou, S., Nicorici, C., Bosshard, W., Voirol, P., Sadeghipour, F., Perrottet, N., Csajka, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-25T19:42:29-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003728</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003728</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Opioid Room of Horrors: a simulation approach to strengthen drug administration safety]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003728</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003728</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003550?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ohio haemorrhage quality improvement project: initial implementation of the Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health (AIM) Hemorrhage Patient Safety Bundle]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003550?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Obstetrical haemorrhage is a common complication of childbirth, and all patients are at risk for haemorrhage. Mortality attributable to haemorrhage has been decreasing in the USA, but the incidence of haemorrhage has continued to increase. In Ohio, one-third (31%) of all pregnancy-related deaths in 2020 were due to causes other than infection, mental health or embolisms, with 3% of those attributed to haemorrhage. Haemorrhage was the third leading cause of pregnancy-related death in the state from 2008 to 2016.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Sponsored by the Ohio Department of Children and Youth, the Hemorrhage Quality Improvement Project (QIP) applies the Institute for Healthcare Improvement&rsquo;s methodology to implement structured quality improvement (QI) activities to improve key measures and implement the Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health&rsquo;s Obstetric Hemorrhage Patient Safety Bundle. Hospitals provided patient data and completed surveys. Data from participating hospitals were used to calculate and monitor improvement in primary process measures (quantitative blood loss and haemorrhage risk assessment).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Across Ohio, 22 delivery hospitals spanning 13 health systems participated in the Hemorrhage QIP pilot. Participating hospitals achieved a statistically significant improvement in all process measures, including quantitative blood loss documentation (both overall and when limited to vaginal deliveries) and in the completion of haemorrhage risk assessment between admission and delivery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The Hemorrhage QIP demonstrates feasibility of a statewide QI initiative to improve care for women who experience obstetrical haemorrhage. Delivery hospitals have clinical expertise to improve outcomes related to postpartum haemorrhage care. Providing opportunity for peer-to-peer learning, evidence-based resources and QI coaching within a replicable QI project creates an opportunity to reduce preventable morbidity and mortality caused by an obstetric haemorrhage.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jenkins, K., Lorenz, A., Menegay, M. C., Fredette, J., Ezzeldin, A., Antonini, A., Lappen, J. R., Schneider, P., Mayer, D., Ghanem, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-25T00:35:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003550</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003550</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ohio haemorrhage quality improvement project: initial implementation of the Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health (AIM) Hemorrhage Patient Safety Bundle]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003550</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003550</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003525?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Leveraging technology and human factor principles to improve outpatient medication reconciliation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003525?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Medication reconciliation is the practice of making sure that medication lists are accurate through transitions of care. This is critical to reduce medication prescription medication errors, which can compromise patient safety. Evidence indicates that communication breakdowns account for a sizable portion of prescription errors, highlighting the importance of efficient medication reconciliation.</p>
<p>Medication reconciliation has been recognised as an important patient safety measure by Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City (SSMC), a large tertiary hospital in the United Arab Emirates. Senior leadership at SSMC, in an effort to adopt safer practices, decided to increase the outpatient medication reconciliation compliance goal to 92%; however, meeting this new goal proved difficult. According to an analysis of the first two quarters of 2023 performance data, the department of medicine&rsquo;s average outpatient medication reconciliation compliance rate was persistently below the new goal of 92%, at 80%.</p>
<p>Over the course of 14 months, from August 2023 to September 2024, 133 328 patient visits were evaluated at the department of medicine outpatient specialty clinics, a busy department serving about 9500 patients each month.</p>
<p>This publication&rsquo;s goal is to highlight the quality improvement initiatives that were put in place to increase outpatient medication reconciliation compliance as well as the results of those initiatives. We were able to increase the department of medicine outpatient medication reconciliation compliance rate from an average of 80% in August 2023 to 97% in April through September 2024 by applying critical thinking, technology and human factor principles. This improvement was maintained.</p>
<p>This study highlights the need for quality improvement teams using information technology to understand the clinical context and human elements at play. The department of medicine&rsquo;s outpatient medication reconciliation improvement initiative paved the way for possible replication in other departments and healthcare organisations by disseminating the lessons acquired from this quality improvement project throughout the hospital.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taha, H., K Mammen, A., Abu Jubbeh, M., Krishnan, S., Moukarzel, M., Madathil Thattandavida, M. N., Hamza, A., Ali, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-23T10:34:10-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003525</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003525</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Leveraging technology and human factor principles to improve outpatient medication reconciliation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003525</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003525</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003686?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of readmissions following elective colorectal surgery: a quality improvement initiative]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003686?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Problem</st>
<p>Hospital readmissions following elective colorectal resections remain a persistent challenge, affecting recovery, hospital efficiency and overall quality of surgical care. Readmissions increase morbidity, healthcare costs and may delay ongoing cancer treatment. Within our institution, the colorectal surgical team noted a rise in unplanned readmissions after discharge, prompting structured evaluation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Colorectal resections form a major component of elective surgical activity at our centre. During early 2024, local Model Health System dashboards showed readmission rates above regional medians for both colonic and rectal resections. These findings, together with governance discussions about potentially preventable readmissions, led to a quality improvement project. National benchmarking data from the Getting It Right First Time programme were used to contextualise performance. These benchmarks are now integrated within the NHS Model Health System, enabling ongoing data-driven monitoring across surgical specialties.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To evaluate 30-day readmission rates following elective colorectal resections, identify contributory factors, and propose targeted quality improvement measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A retrospective observational review was conducted at Whiston Hospital for patients undergoing elective colorectal resections between July and September 2024. Data included demographics, procedure type, comorbidities, length of stay and 30-day readmissions. Causes of readmission were analysed and compared with national data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 28 patients (mean age 61&plusmn;14 years; 61% male), the median length of stay was 6 days. The 30-day readmission rate was 14.2%, exceeding national benchmarks. Common causes included urinary retention, intra-abdominal collections, port-site hernia and gastrointestinal symptoms. Readmissions were associated with shorter stays and comorbidities. Model Health System data indicated early improvement in rectal resections but a modest rise in colonic cases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Readmissions exceeded national averages, emphasising the need for enhanced recovery compliance, prehabilitation, improved discharge planning and early post-discharge follow-up. Continuous benchmarking supports sustainable improvement in outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Singla, L., Mathur, M., Kalaiselvan, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-23T01:32:56-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003686</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003686</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of readmissions following elective colorectal surgery: a quality improvement initiative]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003686</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003686</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003521?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving access to inpatient palliative care for patients with end-stage liver disease: a quality improvement project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003521?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>End-stage liver disease (ESLD) is a terminal diagnosis with a poor prognosis and an accelerating mortality rate in the UK. Limited research suggests that patients with ESLD have unmet palliative care (PC) needs, likely due to various factors, including difficulty predicting prognosis and lack of clear specialist palliative care (SPC) referral criteria.</p>
<p>This quality improvement (QI) project aimed to assess and improve access to PC for inpatients with ESLD and unmet PC needs over a 6-month period using a novel intervention incorporating the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool for Liver Disease (SPICT).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The project was conducted at a tertiary centre between 2020 and 2022 with three data cycles: one baseline measurement and two Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. PDSA cycle 1 involved regular screening of inpatients using the SPICT to trigger SPC referral. PDSA cycle 2 also involved screening using the SPICT, but instead to prompt multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) discussion between hepatology and SPC teams. Outcome measures reflecting holistic aspects of PC were assessed across all cycles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>PDSA cycle 1 demonstrated a significant reduction in patients receiving no PC measures (67% to 26%, p: &lt;0.001) and increased SPC input (32% to 52%, p: 0.04). Community PC referrals also rose significantly (13% to 39%, p: 0.01).</p>
<p>PDSA cycle 2 failed to improve measures compared to baseline. Only 42% of eligible patients were discussed in the MDM. Most agreed plans were implemented, but only a minority included SPC review, community PC referral or advanced care planning.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Patients with ESLD continued to have unmet PC needs despite implementing an intervention based on expert guidance. PDSA cycle 1 demonstrated some significant, positive impacts, supporting the clinical utility of the SPICT, but within the context of a small, single-centre QI project with methodological limitations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ward, E., Hanbury, G., Possamai, L., Rassam, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-22T00:48:28-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003521</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003521</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving access to inpatient palliative care for patients with end-stage liver disease: a quality improvement project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003521</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003521</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003542?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Addressing workplace harassment: a multifaceted approach for nursing students in a tertiary hospital in Singapore]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003542?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Workplace harassment among healthcare workers, particularly nursing students, has reached concerning levels, often resulting in serious consequences. At an acute tertiary teaching hospital in Singapore, reported cases of harassment among nursing students doubled from four in 2019 to eight in 2021. Delayed reporting, often due to a lack of awareness of a structured reporting system, exacerbates the issue. The Clinical Abuse Preventive Education for Students (CAPES) team was formed in January 2022 to empower nursing students to identify, manage and report abusive situations, with its impact evaluated using Kirkpatrick&rsquo;s four-level training evaluation framework.</p>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Interventions included the development and dissemination of infographic booklets, the establishment of <I>CAPES Buddy</I> for incident reporting and faculty training in psychological support skills. A total of 811 nursing students commenced training under the CAPES initiative between January 2023 and April 2024. Of these, 542 completed both baseline and follow-up surveys, which measured understanding of workplace harassment and confidence in responding. Additionally, 54 faculty members underwent psychological support training to strengthen their ability to support students in crisis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Following the interventions, nursing students demonstrated a 13.7% increase in their ability to identify harassment and an 18.7% increase in confidence to respond appropriately. Overall, 98% of students demonstrated comprehension of harassment-related issues. These improvements were accompanied by increased reporting and more appropriate triage of harassment cases, with students using CAPES Buddy for complex incidents while clinical instructors managed less severe cases as first-line support. Faculty members also reported enhanced competence in supporting students, contributing to a safer learning environment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>CAPES strengthened students&rsquo; awareness of workplace harassment and improved their confidence in responding and reporting incidents. While most students found the training relevant and beneficial, delayed reporting remains a challenge. Future work should explore factors contributing to reporting delay such as fear of retaliation or lack of trust in reporting systems and evaluate targeted strategies to address them.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lim, M., Kaur, M., Du, R., Diomano, D. R., Ng, C. K. L., Tan, J. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-22T00:48:28-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003542</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003542</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Addressing workplace harassment: a multifaceted approach for nursing students in a tertiary hospital in Singapore]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003542</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003542</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003602?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Enhancing leadership transitions in student-run clinics: a quality improvement initiative to standardise onboarding]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003602?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Onboarding inefficiencies in student-run healthcare organisations can lead to unclear role expectations, inconsistent knowledge transfer and disruptions in leadership transitions. This quality improvement (QI) initiative evaluates the implementation of a standardised operating procedure (SOP) within Street Medicine Detroit (SMD), a medical student-run clinic, to improve onboarding and leadership continuity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A QI initiative was developed to create an SOP based on retrospective surveys from past leaders, identifying key organisational challenges. Post implementation surveys assessed the SOP&rsquo;s impact on onboarding effectiveness, role clarity and preparedness. The project followed a Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle to guide the intervention and evaluate outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The SOP improved new leader onboarding by reducing reliance on board members, increasing clarity of training materials and enhancing preparedness to lead from day 1. Leaders trained with the SOP reported fewer unanswered questions and greater self-reliance. Survey results indicated significant improvements in clarity and role understanding, with new leaders preferring to reference the SOP over informal knowledge transfer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The findings suggest that SOPs are an effective tool for improving operational efficiency and leadership transitions in student-led healthcare organisations. This intervention also integrated QI education, fostering leadership skills and systems-based thinking. The study highlights the applicability of this model to other healthcare settings. The implementation of an SOP at SMD successfully addressed long-standing onboarding inefficiencies, providing a scalable solution to improve leadership transitions. This model can be applied to other student-run clinics and healthcare organisations, enhancing both organisational efficiency and medical education.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cohn, H., Patterson, A., Krishnan, D., Babu, R., Biel, L., Gardner, C., Levine, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-22T00:48:28-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003602</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003602</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Enhancing leadership transitions in student-run clinics: a quality improvement initiative to standardise onboarding]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003602</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003602</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003635?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding barriers and identifying solutions for smoking cessation in primary care: survey results informed by an integrated knowledge translation approach in British Columbia, Canada]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003635?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>This quality improvement project was designed to identify perceptions, knowledge and training needs of primary care providers (PCPs) in British Columbia regarding smoking cessation treatment with the intent to improve practices and identify feasible methods to mitigate barriers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>An integrated knowledge translation approach was used to design, implement and analyse a survey for primary care practitioners in the provincial context of British Columbia. The survey was divided into the four main sections: Demographic Information, Knowledge Assessment, Training Needs and Perception of Barriers. It was distributed through advertisement in e-newsletters for family physicians and nurse practitioners. It is aimed to evaluate and understand PCPs&rsquo; perceptions of tobacco use disorder and smoking cessation treatment; confidence when providing tobacco use disorder and smoking cessation support and treatment; educational needs and desired supports and barriers to providing and accessing smoking cessation supports and resources.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The survey garnered 198 complete responses from 154 family physicians and 44 nurse practitioners. Findings highlight a need for increased training and resources while exploring desired training content and methods of delivery. Time constraints were identified as the primary barrier to providing smoking cessation intervention, alongside lacking referral pathways, clinical services and support, and compensation. Respondents expressed a desire for &lsquo;cheat sheets&rsquo; with information on smoking cessation resources and best practices, training and education on counselling techniques and vaping cessation guidance, and integrated clinical workflows.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This project emphasises the need for an interdisciplinary approach to smoking cessation centred around integration of resources, training and policies into current workflows (such as electronic medical records or a centralised platform for information). Important gaps have been illuminated in the processes that support smoking cessation in primary care in British Columbia.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simmons, M., Shellington, E., Afshar, T., Struik, L., Hoekstra, F., Myers, R., Khara, M., Gerald, M., Johnson, J., Joshi, P., Carlsten, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-22T00:48:28-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003635</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003635</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding barriers and identifying solutions for smoking cessation in primary care: survey results informed by an integrated knowledge translation approach in British Columbia, Canada]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003635</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003635</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003658?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing an AI-driven multimodal approach to visualising resilient team performance: joint attentional engagement with gaze and speech in simulated emergency scenarios]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003658?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Healthcare team performance directly impacts the quality and safety of medical care. However, measuring the performance of teams is challenging and requires methodologies to investigate different contributing elements. This study proposes an AI(artificial intelligence)-driven multimodal approach to visualising gaze (ie, joint visual attention) and speech in medical team performance and examines how these might differ across medical expertise, using eye-trackers and our own automatic gaze annotation programme.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Four simulation sessions, two in Japan and another two in the UK, were filmed with eye-trackers worn by a clinician and a nurse. In each site, one session was conducted with an experienced pair (UK_Ex and JP_Ex) and the other with a less experienced pair (UK_LessEx and JP_LessEx). The scenarios were a difficult intubation in Japan and a urine infection, with a family member present, in the UK. The numbers of occurrences and the time lengths of joint attention and individuals&rsquo; speeches in the four data sets were compared in total and in 15 s time ranges to see the correlations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Result</st>
<p>The Ex pairs in both contexts paid joint visual attention more frequently and longer and spoke more than the LessEx pairs. In the JP_Ex, the positive correlation was found between the numbers of joint attention and the total speech durations (r=0.81). That indicates the team members verbally coordinated each other&rsquo;s attentional objects, which is termed coregulative attentional engagement. In contrast, in the UK_Ex, the correlation was negative (r=&ndash;0.70), where they visually monitored each other&rsquo;s actions while talking to the patient&rsquo;s family, which we call coinfluential attentional engagement. These tendencies were weak in the LessEx pairs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Although the accuracy of automatic annotation (approximately. 40%&ndash;60%) should be improved before applying it to medical training, the research method could provide preliminary insight into elements of good team performance.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miyazaki, A., Coffey, F., Sato, H., Mackenzie, A. K., Nakamura, K., Bise, K., Saitoh, T., Abe, T., Fuyuno, M., Timmons, S., Tsuchiya, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-22T00:48:28-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003658</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003658</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing an AI-driven multimodal approach to visualising resilient team performance: joint attentional engagement with gaze and speech in simulated emergency scenarios]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research [amp   ] reporting methodology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003658</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003658</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003704?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[AI-generated videos in medical education: systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003704?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Artificial intelligence (AI)-generated text to video is emerging in medical education, but its effectiveness, accuracy and safety remain uncertain. We aimed to synthesise empirical studies evaluating these tools in learner or patient education.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Cochrane Review and Web of Science for studies published up to January 2025. Eligible studies evaluated AI-generated text to video for medical or patient education, reporting both quantitative and qualitative outcomes. Two reviewers screened and extracted data. The review adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Out of 103 identified studies, five studies met the inclusion criteria: four evaluated patient education and one evaluated physician training. Clinical areas were ophthalmology (2/5), plastic surgery (1/5), dysphagia rehabilitation (1/5) and neurosurgical training (1/5). In ophthalmology, control materials outperformed AI-generated videos on image/script accuracy (p&lt;0.005), with similar script-image alignment. In dysphagia rehabilitation, a randomised trial reported improvements in swallowing function and related outcomes with an AI-assisted video game intervention (p&lt;0.001). A plastic surgery study reported greater user preference for a video avatar tool compared with a text chatbot (63.5% vs 28.1%). Across the reviewed studies, samples were small and CIs were rarely reported. Outcome measures were heterogeneous, and meta-analysis was not feasible.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>AI-generated videos can enhance engagement or selected outcomes in certain contexts, yet concerns about accuracy and inconsistent measurement persist. Current evidence is sparse and mixed. Currently, these tools can complement, rather than replace, standard resources until non-inferiority is demonstrated for the prespecified primary outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42025640042.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artsi, Y., Sorin, V., Glicksberg, B., Korfiatis, P., Thomas, D. C., Nadkarni, G. N., Klang, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-22T00:48:28-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003704</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003704</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[AI-generated videos in medical education: systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003704</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003704</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003503?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Intravenous fluid mismanagement: time for national stewardship and quality improvement]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003503?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <sec id="s1"><st>Introduction</st> <p>In 2013, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) published Clinical Guideline 174 (CG174),<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> guiding healthcare providers in UK hospitals on the safe administration of intravenous fluid therapy. This guidance was subsequently updated in 2017 and reviewed in 2021 without being substantially altered. The guidance provides educational insights into patients&rsquo; physiological requirements for water and electrolytes before categorising the indications for intravenous fluid prescription as routine maintenance, resuscitation, replacement and redistribution requirements. The guidance is supplemented by numerous posters, graphics and other aide-memoires to facilitate and promote good practice. Widespread implementation of this guidance will individualise and rationalise intravenous fluid prescribing practice and minimise the potential harms associated with incorrect or injudicious use of intravenous fluids. Given recent global shortages in access to intravenous fluids, adoption of best-practice, as well as new initiatives such as &lsquo;Sip til Send&rsquo;,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> ensures optimal and sustainable...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Breen, A., Miller, A., Timmins, A., Barton, G., Kirk-Bayley, J., Peck, M. J. E., Davis, H. J., Wilkinson, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-14T21:57:09-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003503</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003503</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Intravenous fluid mismanagement: time for national stewardship and quality improvement]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003503</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003503</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003622?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Automating pending labs list into discharge summaries]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003622?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Pending test results not communicated during the post-acute care transition may pose harm and lead to diagnostic errors in patients. This quality improvement initiative aimed to assess the effectiveness of pending labs communication by automating a list of pending labs into discharge summaries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A SmartLink was developed in the EpicCare electronic health record that populates a list of pending labs and pathology studies and was added to the standard discharge summary template for hospitalists and resident physicians. A 2-month pre-post review of randomly selected discharge encounters was conducted to assess the frequencies of discharge summaries reporting pending labs, discharges with pending labs, discharges with eventually abnormal pending labs and discharges with results reported in follow-up notes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 291 pre-intervention encounters reviewed, 130 (44.7%) had one or more labs pending, compared with 115 (40.6%) of 283 post-intervention encounters. 35 (26.9%) of the pre-intervention discharge summaries mentioned all pending labs, compared with 104 (90.4%) post-intervention, p value &lt;0.01. There was no difference in the frequency of discharge encounters with results reported in follow-up notes; however, a trend towards significance was observed for those with abnormal results.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Implementing an automated link that pulls pending studies into discharge summary templates drastically improved documentation of pending labs. However, given the complexity of post-acute care transitions, more work is needed to ensure receipt and follow-up of this crucial communication.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nguyen, K. T., Aniemeka, C., Feaster, N., Tran, M. C., Cerasale, M. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-12T01:18:53-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003622</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003622</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Automating pending labs list into discharge summaries]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003622</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003622</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003275?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Co-designing recommendations to improve adolescent and young adult healthcare in Queensland]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003275?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This research aimed to identify and co-design recommendations to optimise adolescent and young adult (AYA) healthcare through the development of a statewide strategy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>An exploratory mixed methods co-design constructionist epistemological framework was used to identify recommendations. Participants comprised young people (15&ndash;25 years of age) with experience accessing healthcare for acute or chronic concerns, carers and professionals. Focus groups and a statewide survey were conducted concurrently.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Eighty-one individuals varying in location and fields across Queensland participated in nine focus groups. Themes and subthemes were successfully identified through the thematic analysis of the focus groups. Within the context of barriers and enablers, participants identified gaps and proposed recommendations to optimise care. Across the nine focus groups, consistent themes emerged, demonstrating sufficient data collection and saturation of responses. Additionally, 107 responses were collected, scored and ranked through the statewide survey prioritising predetermined recommendations to optimise AYA care, based on scoping work completed in 2020. Of the 57 recommendations presented to survey participants, 41 (71.9%) of these were classified as &lsquo;needed&rsquo; and &lsquo;very important&rsquo; to optimise AYA healthcare. Collective thematic analysis resulted in a list of prioritised recommendations to improve healthcare services for AYAs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The research highlighted two central priorities: overcoming systemic challenges within AYA healthcare and establishing a clear, consistent definition and model of quality care in Queensland. The combined findings strongly support the urgent need to embed standardised principles, approaches and practices across the health system to ensure equitable and effective care for all young people.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McCoola, B., Thomas, C., Beswick, R., Christoffersen, A., Atkins, H., Holland, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-10T02:29:14-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003275</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003275</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Co-designing recommendations to improve adolescent and young adult healthcare in Queensland]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003275</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003275</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003580?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Health workers perspectives on barriers and opportunities to optimising quality improvement implementation in urban health facilities in Lilongwe, Malawi]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003580?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Eliminating vertical HIV transmission requires high-quality Option B+ services, which provide lifelong antiretroviral therapy to pregnant and breastfeeding women living with HIV. In Malawi, coverage has expanded, but quality remains suboptimal, contributing to challenges in sustaining engagement in care. Quality improvement (QI) approaches can strengthen service delivery and evidence-based practices, with healthcare workers (HCWs) central to implementation. This study explores barriers and opportunities HCWs face in implementing QI in Option B+ within high-volume urban facilities in Lilongwe, Malawi.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A descriptive phenomenological qualitative study was conducted between March and June 2021 in five health facilities in Lilongwe, Malawi. Semistructured in-depth interviews were conducted with 30 purposively selected HCWs (4&ndash;8 per facility) involved in delivering Option B+ services. Thematic analysis was used, with data coded deductively and inductively. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was applied to map the identified themes into relevant domains and constructs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>QI practices among HCWs were hindered by resource constraints, lack of incentives/reimbursement for QI activities conducted beyond working hours, poor communication between QI teams and implementers and resistance or negative attitudes towards QI. Opportunities to enhance QI included increasing meeting frequency, providing mentorship, peer-to-peer learning through exchange visits and securing funding from development partners.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Improving QI utilisation in Option B+ requires mobilising resources and having a structured feedback and mentorship mechanisms. Targeted incentives/reimbursements for HCWs and peer-to-peer learning through exchange visits between facilities can further enhance QI. Therefore, a blended QI approach incorporating these recommendations is needed to better support HCWs in delivering evidence-based interventions, strengthen the health system and may improve engagement outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kumwenda, W., Bengtson, A. M., Wallie, S., Villiera, J. B., Bula, A. K., Ngoma, E., Hosseinipour, M., Mwapasa, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-10T02:29:14-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003580</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003580</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Health workers perspectives on barriers and opportunities to optimising quality improvement implementation in urban health facilities in Lilongwe, Malawi]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003580</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003580</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003604?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Longitudinal quality improvement project to increase colorectal cancer screening for an underserved population in a resident physician-led primary care clinic]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003604?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The overall rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the US population have been declining steadily over the past 30 years, in large part due to timely cancer screenings. Despite the emergence of new screening modalities, a large portion of the population has not completed CRC screening in accordance with guidelines. Adequate and timely screening can prevent or detect CRC in earlier stages. Various factors have been identified that influence screening completion. Lower screening rates have been associated with the underserved population, especially in the immigrant community and patients with inadequate access to healthcare. In the USA, primary care clinics associated with internal and family medicine residency programmes often serve as catch-net clinics for the community, serving to provide care to those with a higher burden of social determinants of health.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>We aimed to increase the rates of CRC screening in a primary care clinic associated with the internal medicine residency programme of a large healthcare system. In October 2021, the clinic had a CRC screening rate of 55.40%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This prospective quality improvement study was implemented from July 2022 to January 2025 at the resident-run clinic. Data on CRC screening completion were analysed monthly.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Six Plan&ndash;Do&ndash;Study&ndash;Act cycles were implemented over the course of the project. These interventions were developed from results of root-cause analyses as well as feedback from patients and providers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>CRC screening rates rose from 55.40% to 65.79% over the period of interest with the implementation of sequential targeted interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Underserved patients are at higher risk of CRC screening incompletion. Multifaceted interventions and multidisciplinary collaboration are essential for increasing CRC screening in this vulnerable population.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jasti, V. V., Grebennikov, S. N., Barlow, M., Lo, D. Y., Govani, S. M., Chan, M., Willett, A. E., Barlow, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-10T02:29:14-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003604</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003604</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Longitudinal quality improvement project to increase colorectal cancer screening for an underserved population in a resident physician-led primary care clinic]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003604</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003604</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003667?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multicentre quality improvement initiative to improve patient education and safety in the prescription of Sodium-Glucose transporter 2 inhibitors]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003667?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Sodium-Glucose Transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors provide both cardiorenal and metabolic benefits but have several adverse side effects. Effective patient education is critical to ensure safe use and patient compliance. This project aimed to assess and address gaps in patient knowledge about SGLT2-inhibitors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and results</st>
<p>This quality improvement project was conducted in two tertiary and one district general hospitals in the UK in patients who had been prescribed SGLT2-inhibitors for either diabetes or heart failure. Initially, 100 patients were surveyed on their understanding of SGLT2-inhibitor use, including awareness of indications and side-effects. A patient information leaflet was developed in collaboration with the community pharmacy team and distributed to patients. Six months later, a follow-up survey of 54 patients evaluated their confidence in medication use and knowledge of adverse effects.</p>
<p>The initial survey revealed: 70% were unaware of their medication, 12% had read the manufacturer&rsquo;s information, 5% were aware of sick-day rules and 12% recognised the risk of UTIs. Diabetic patients demonstrated low awareness of the risk of euglycaemic ketoacidosis (11%) and foot complications (5.6%). Diabetic patients also had higher hospitalisation rates due to drug-related adverse effects. 98% of patients agreed that receiving information about side effects was important. Postintervention, 100% of surveyed patients reported confidence in using SGLT2-inhibitors and knowing when to seek medical advice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This initiative demonstrates that patients generally lack knowledge regarding the use of SGLT2-inhibitors. Patient education is crucial in improving understanding and medication compliance. Implementing accessible supplemental resources can enhance continued compliance and safety.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saad, L., Adiga, A., Anwar Mohamed, M., Saha, P., Kuehl, M., Banerjee, P., Tran, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-10T02:29:14-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003667</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003667</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multicentre quality improvement initiative to improve patient education and safety in the prescription of Sodium-Glucose transporter 2 inhibitors]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003667</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003667</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003533?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Methods used to develop quality of care standards and indicators for mental health across the WHO European region: a rapid systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003533?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This rapid review aims to understand whether a standardised approach to developing quality standards and indicators for mental health has been used across the WHO European Region and beyond to inform methods to develop quality standards for child and adolescent mental health services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Improving the quality of child and adolescent mental healthcare across the WHO European Region is a priority. Despite advances in quality of care for mental health, many challenges remain, including the lack of a standardised approach to quality improvement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Inclusion criteria</st>
<p>Papers that outline methods used to develop quality standards or indicators for mental healthcare, published since the year 2000 in English and for use in the WHO European Region, Australia, Canada or the USA, were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Methods were based on guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute and WHO. Searches were conducted across PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo and Google Scholar from 16 January to 30 January 2024. The titles/abstracts and full-text articles were screened by two reviewers independently, and the inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied. A template based on five steps proposed to develop health indicators was used to extract relevant data by one reviewer and verified by another.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>21 studies were included in the review. All papers originated from high-income countries, with dominance from the USA, Canada and the UK. Most papers described four or five of the five proposed steps; however, there was variation in the extent to which these steps were described and how they were implemented.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The results suggest that no consistent approach has been used to develop quality standards/indicators for mental healthcare. There is a need for more participation from people with lived experience and for more research across a wider geographic area.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PRSOPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024496509.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hall, J., Sibilio, R., Lazeri, L., Breda, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-09T01:08:06-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003533</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003533</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Methods used to develop quality of care standards and indicators for mental health across the WHO European region: a rapid systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003533</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003533</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003511?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Digesting the problem: standardising care for children who present to ED after ingesting foreign bodies]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003511?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Foreign body ingestion is a common reason for paediatric emergency department (ED) attendance. At baseline in our institution, only 55% of children were managed in accordance with international best practice. No local guideline was in place.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To implement a locally developed guideline and educational intervention to improve adherence to best practice in the management of paediatric foreign body ingestion.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a quality improvement project in a single tertiary ED over 5 months, using three plan&ndash;do&ndash;study&ndash;act (PDSA) cycles. Interventions included guideline development, dissemination at NCHD induction and departmental teaching and case-based discussions. The SMART aim was to improve correct management from 55% to &gt;80% within 5 months. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of cases managed correctly according to the guideline. Process measures were unnecessary imaging and inappropriate specialist referrals; return visits were tracked as a balancing measure. Data were analysed descriptively and displayed using a p-chart. Educational impact was explored with case vignettes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>27 consecutive patients were included in the intervention period. Correct management increased from 55% at baseline to 87%&ndash;100% across PDSA cycles, exceeding the SMART aim. Process measures improved: unnecessary imaging decreased from 16% to 12% and inappropriate referrals from 3% to 0%. Avoidable return visits fell from 4% to 0%, without evidence of harm. Case vignette scores improved modestly (54%&ndash;63%), with variation across individual cases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Introduction of a locally developed guideline significantly improved adherence to best practice in paediatric foreign body ingestion. Improvements extended to process and balancing measures, demonstrating a true test of change. Embedding the guideline in induction, teaching and the hospital intranet is expected to support sustainability.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fouche, W., McDonnell, S., Roche, C., Samy, A., Binchy, J., Foley, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-07T21:10:01-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003511</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003511</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Digesting the problem: standardising care for children who present to ED after ingesting foreign bodies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003511</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003511</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003857?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[True anticoagulation safety cannot be achieved without better anticoagulants]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003857?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>We read with great interest the recent publication by Lui <I>et al</I> in the May 2025 issue, entitled &lsquo;<I>Improving the Safety of Heparin Usage by Standardization Practice&rsquo;.</I> We applaud their quality improvement initiative, which addresses the challenges of managing heparin&mdash;a well-known high-risk medication&mdash;and aligns closely with both the Anticoagulation Forum&rsquo;s concept of anticoagulation stewardship and the Joint Commission&rsquo;s <I>National Patient Safety Goals</I>.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> The authors highlight the risks and practical challenges associated with heparin, underscoring the importance of their work. Building on their discussion, we wish to expand on the broader limitations of heparin&mdash;limitations that clinicians have long accepted due to established practice, experience and cost. We also extend this reflection to other anticoagulants, many of which have not yet delivered the anticipated advantages over heparin.</p> <p>Pharmacologically, heparin is a complex sulfated polysaccharide that exerts its anticoagulant effect primarily by enhancing the activity of antithrombin.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> All...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beavers, C. J., Hoffman, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-05T00:25:31-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003857</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003857</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[True anticoagulation safety cannot be achieved without better anticoagulants]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003857</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003857</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003480?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Strategies for optimising health system managers engagement in quality improvement projects: lessons learnt from the COMPAS+ project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003480?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Quality improvement strategies are used in healthcare to enhance the quality, safety and efficiency of service delivery. While the involvement of managers is considered critical, their roles remain underdocumented. This study examines the roles of managers in COMPAS+, a quality improvement collaborative conceived to enhance chronic disease care in Quebec, Canada. It explores managers&rsquo; specific contributions to quality improvement projects to deepen understanding of effective managerial engagement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This qualitative case study compares the roles played by managers (health network directors, division managers and local service network and family medicine group directors) within four regional health networks that participated in COMPAS+ from 2016 to 2019. Deductive and inductive thematic analysis of workshop reports, action plans and interviews with 24 key actors was performed, informed by a recent scoping review of decision-makers&rsquo; roles in quality improvement projects and project management literature.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The study revealed variability in project management across cases, particularly in the distribution of responsibility among upper, middle and lower management. Upper management provided strategic direction, middle management oversaw project execution and bridged organisational tiers, while lower management coordinated local change efforts. Middle managers were tasked with project management but often lacked role clarity and training. A significant gap was found in methodological guidance, typically provided by a quality improvement facilitator. This gap hindered projects&rsquo; potential and, in some cases, led to deviations from the intended quality improvement model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Effective quality improvement project management requires well-defined managerial roles, training and communication between management levels. Our findings highlight the importance of integrating a facilitator role to provide methodological expertise and ensure adherence to quality improvement processes. Contextual expertise and local change leadership may be complemented by external quality improvement expertise. These insights lay the groundwork for future research on evidence-based strategies for effective project management.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gagnon, J., Vachon, B., Breton, M., Giasson, G., Gaboury, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-04T09:44:29-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003480</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003480</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Strategies for optimising health system managers engagement in quality improvement projects: lessons learnt from the COMPAS+ project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003480</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003480</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003013?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quality improvement methodology used in enhanced recovery after caesarean delivery implementation studies: a narrative review and author survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003013?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Enhanced recovery after caesarean delivery (ERAC) is gaining popularity and has been shown to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. We aimed to identify the presence and type of quality improvement (QI) methodology used in ERAC studies through an exploratory analysis, including author surveys and literature review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We performed a literature search using four databases (MEDLINE through PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science and Embase) to identify ERAC studies. Studies were considered if they compared an &lsquo;enhanced&rsquo; or &lsquo;fast track&rsquo; protocol to a control group and evaluated more than one system or outcome. The adopted QI methodology was evaluated through a standardised questionnaire developed by the authors which was sent to the authors of included studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We identified 29 studies. A standardised questionnaire was applied to all included papers to evaluate the presence and type of QI methodology, and 24 authors were approached to complete the survey. We received results from 15 authors, yielding a response rate of 63%. 40% of authors reported use of defined QI methodology, the majority using the Model for Improvement. The QI components most used by those not reporting use of a defined methodology were engagement with multidisciplinary key stakeholders (80%), use of key drivers (87%) and process mapping (60%). Most authors reported use of traditional statistical methodology when analysing results (73%), and 60% reported use of Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence guidelines. The mean duration of baseline data collection by non-randomised controlled trial studies was 11 months and 9.9 months after implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>There is a large variation in the QI practices used in protocol implementation and publication of ERAC studies. The minority of authors report the use of a defined QI methodology and very few report the use of standardised tools in their published works.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42023399418.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fedoruk, K., Carvalho, B., Blake, L., Sultan, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-03T08:59:38-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003013</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003013</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quality improvement methodology used in enhanced recovery after caesarean delivery implementation studies: a narrative review and author survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003013</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003013</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003592?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving compliance with safe sleep practices among Black/African American infants discharged from a level III NICU: a quality improvement initiative]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003592?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) remains a leading cause of infant mortality in the USA, disproportionately affecting Black/African American infants. In Cook County, Illinois, Black/African American infants had SUID rates 14 times higher than non-Hispanic white infants between 2020 and 2021. Despite widespread safe sleep education, racial disparities persist. Our Specific, Measurable, Acheivable, Relevant, and Time-Bound (SMART) aim was to increase safe sleep compliance among mothers of Black/African American infants discharged from our neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) by 5% over 12 months by providing targeted, equitable and culturally sensitive education, measured using an adapted validated safe sleep survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This project, conducted in a level III NICU at the University of Illinois Hospital in Chicago began planning in May 2023. Baseline data were collected (November 2023&ndash;February 2024) via caregiver surveys and chart reviews. Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles (March&ndash;November 2024) introduced interventions like the &lsquo;Alone-Back-Crib&rsquo; (ABC) Safe Sleep handouts on SUID disparities, staff education, and short videos. Compliance was assessed postdischarge through surveys and clinic questionnaires, with preintervention and postintervention data analysed using &sup2; and t-tests. A control chart (p-chart) tracked process changes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 248 infants (70 baseline, 178 intervention), mean safe sleep compliance increased from 96% to 97% (p=0.26). Reports of infants &lsquo;never&rsquo; sleeping alone in a crib declined from 11.4% to 3.9% (p=0.01). Caregivers valued enhanced messaging on SUID disparities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Despite high baseline compliance, culturally tailored education reinforced safe sleep practices. While overall adherence changed minimally, increased awareness and behavioural shifts highlight the need for sustained interventions, community engagement, implicit bias training and systemic strategies to reduce racial disparities in SUID.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Farouk, F., Pham, A., Pillers, D.-A., Tarach, C., Schwartz, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T23:06:43-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003592</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003592</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving compliance with safe sleep practices among Black/African American infants discharged from a level III NICU: a quality improvement initiative]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003592</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003592</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003896?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Unveiling the paradox: a commentary on AIs unintended consequences in organ donation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003896?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>We are writing to provide a commentary on the article titled, &lsquo;Streamlining organ donation: impact of an artificial intelligence-based protocol post-brain death,&rsquo; published in <I>BMJ Open Quality</I>.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> The study&rsquo;s focus on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the time-sensitive and ethically complex field of organ donation is highly relevant to current discussions in medical quality improvement. We commend the authors for their publication and for their candid admission that the AI protocol led to the unexpected outcome of increased delays. This finding highlights a crucial challenge that is globally relevant: why a seemingly beneficial intervention can have unintended consequences.</p> <p>However, upon review, several methodological and conceptual points are apparent that warrant discussion to contextualise the findings and inform future research.</p> <p>First, an important consideration is the small sample size, which followed only 45 donors over 5 years. The organ donation process is complex and variable, and...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saeed, M. H., Tanveer, F. S., Rizvi, S. E. Z., Khan, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T23:06:43-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003896</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003896</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Unveiling the paradox: a commentary on AIs unintended consequences in organ donation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003896</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003896</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003555?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transforming caregivers into partners: advancing WHO patient safety goals in Singapore acute hospital]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003555?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Engaging caregivers as active partners in care is a cornerstone of Strategic Objective 4 in the WHO&rsquo;s Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021&ndash;2030. Despite its recognised importance, caregiver integration in acute care remains inconsistent, with significant gaps in registration processes, role clarity and institutional support. At Singapore General Hospital (SGH), a 1900-bed academic medical centre, caregiver involvement was previously informal and varied across clinical settings. This hospital-wide quality improvement initiative aimed to improve the caregiver-to-admission ratio from 1:6 to 1:4 within 6 months. Caregiver was defined as a family member formally registered through the hospital&rsquo;s Automated Visitor Management System (AVMS) and oriented to participate in basic patient care. A multidisciplinary team co-designed a scalable intervention through staff engagement and collaboration with the SingHealth Patient Advocacy Network (SPAN). Key strategies included simplified electronic registration, admission-based caregiver orientation, policy revisions to enable overnight stays, bedside education and flexible learning tools. These changes were embedded into clinical workflows and supported by infrastructure enhancements. Between April 2024 and March 2025, admission-to-caregiver ratio improved from 1:6 in the pre-implementation period to 1:4 post-implementation (5512 caregivers across 33 191 admissions pre-implementation vs 9592 caregivers across 38 874 admissions post-implementation). In addition, hospital-wide patient experience indicator from the Service Level Tracking (SLT) dashboard was included as a balancing measure. The percentage of patients and families who responded &lsquo;Definitely yes&rsquo; to recommending SGH to family and friends improved from 81.9% pre-implementation to 85.2% post-implementation. The initiative reflects not only SGH&rsquo;s operational readiness and leadership commitment but also a broader paradigm shift: the healthcare team&rsquo;s growing recognition of the value of partnering with families, and the public&rsquo;s increasing willingness to participate in care even within high-acuity hospital environments. This project exemplifies how aligning systems, mindsets and partnerships can bring the WHO&rsquo;s patient safety goals into practical, sustainable action.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Teo, K. Y., Yuan, L. X., Kan, S. H., Ho, A. L., Ng, G. N. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-30T20:56:54-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003555</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003555</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transforming caregivers into partners: advancing WHO patient safety goals in Singapore acute hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003555</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003555</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003683?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Collaborative Working to Address Inappropriate ED Attendances by Nursing Home Residents]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003683?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Increase in life expectancy in Ireland and social isolation has led to an increasing number of people living in residential care facilities (RCFs). Residents are frequently transferred to emergency departments (ED) for a variety of reasons. Studies found that up to 40% of these hospital admissions were deemed inappropriate. An inappropriate admission in previous studies has been defined as a situation in which care in lower cost settings would be as safe and less disruptive than care in higher cost hospital settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A review of a convenience sample of ED attendances to University Hospital Kerry (UHK) found that 50% were inappropriate. A SMART aim in a quality improvement project (QIP) is an aim which is Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Time based. The SMART aim of this QIP was to reduce the number of persons residing in RCFs, being inappropriately referred to UHK, from 50% to 30% from March 2024 to May 2025.</p>
<p>Quality improvement (QI) measures included the standardisation of terminology through the workings of the palliative frailty multidisciplinary team, development of a communication document on resuscitation status and treatment escalation preferences, and the implementation of an advanced nurse practitioner (ANP) palliative care service for RCFs supported by a palliative medicine physician. Education was integral in this QIP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>QI measures resulted in a reduction in monthly ED attendances of RCF residents from a median of 82 to 50. Inappropriate attendances reduced from 50% to 31%. Stakeholders&rsquo; feedback on the new service was overwhelmingly positive. The project resulted in financial savings for the health service.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Integration of the geriatric and palliative medicine services with staff of RCFs allowed for sharing of knowledge, standardisation of terminology and development of alternative models of care and pathways to access specialties. The introduction of a designated ANP palliative care service for RCFs has been essential in helping residents to receive the right care, in the right place, at the right time.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McCarthy, M., Sheahan, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-27T19:45:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003683</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003683</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Collaborative Working to Address Inappropriate ED Attendances by Nursing Home Residents]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003683</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003683</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003691?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating professional interpreting services for patients with limited English proficiency in secondary care settings: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003691?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) face significant language barriers in healthcare, leading to poorer clinical outcomes. Professional medical interpreters are essential for equitable, high-quality care. While their use is widely recommended, there is limited understanding of the optimal objective outcome measures to best evaluate interpreter effectiveness in secondary and tertiary care settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A scoping review was conducted which was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Four databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase and CINAHL) were searched without date or language limits. We included comparative studies assessing professional medical interpreting services for adult patients with LEP in secondary or tertiary care using objective outcome measures related to clinical outcomes and/or healthcare utilisation. Data extraction included study design, interpreter modalities, outcome measures and adjustments for confounders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Most were cohort or cross-sectional studies, predominantly conducted in the USA. The most common outcome measures were clinical, including length of stay (n=8), readmission (n=5) and return emergency visits (n=3). Four studies assessed healthcare utilisation, including outpatient appointment adherence. Results varied: some studies showed reduced length of stay and readmissions with interpreter use, while others found longer stays or no effect. Disease-specific outcomes (e.g., stroke care quality and obstetric indicators) consistently favoured interpreter or health advocate use. Adjustment for confounders was inconsistent with few studies accounting for illness severity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This review highlights the heterogeneity and limitations in existing outcome measures for evaluating interpreter services. Length of stay and readmission are commonly used but prone to confounding. Disease-specific outcomes may offer greater sensitivity and relevance, especially when adjusted for clinical severity. Future research should prioritise the development of validated, standardised outcome sets that reflect both patient priorities and clinical relevance. These are essential for guiding service improvement and equitable healthcare delivery for LEP populations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kulkarni, S., Flanagan, S., Ager, N., Leung, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-27T19:45:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003691</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003691</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating professional interpreting services for patients with limited English proficiency in secondary care settings: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003691</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003691</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003706?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preventing and mitigating fraudulent research participants in online qualitative violence and injury prevention research]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003706?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Recruiting participants for injury and violence-related studies can be challenging, and online data collection opportunities can expand reach, offer convenience and extend a sense of safety to potential participants who may be in unsafe situations or do not want to travel to a location due to safety concerns. While increasing accessibility for some participants, online primary data collection presents challenges around potential fraudulent participants. This methodological paper highlights the strategies for preventing and mitigating fraudulent participants in online qualitative data collection, using a recent firearm violence study in a Northeast city as an example.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Using a recent data collection effort related to firearm injury as a case study, the purpose of the current methodology paper is to highlight concerns and challenges with online qualitative data collection and provide strategies for preventing, detecting and removing fraudulent participants in qualitative injury and violence prevention research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Various predata collection activities can promote a study design that deters fraudulent participants, and additional &lsquo;in-the-moment&rsquo; data collection activities can flag potential suspicious participants. Strategies include prescreening participants, requiring video and answers to basic questions relevant to the study topic and confirming certain pieces of information.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Online primary data collection can increase accessibility and support the safety of participants in injury and violence research, and there are considerations around detecting and removing fraudulent participants that researchers should note. Like all methods, a balance exists between study access, aims and resources. Researchers new to online qualitative data collection can use the strategies outlined here.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ziminski, D., Liddell-Quintyn, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-27T19:45:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003706</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003706</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preventing and mitigating fraudulent research participants in online qualitative violence and injury prevention research]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research [amp   ] reporting methodology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003706</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003706</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003419?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Differences in contributing factors to diagnostic errors between physicians and allied health professionals: a nationwide analysis in Japan]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003419?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Diagnostic errors significantly contribute to adverse events, patient harm and malpractice claims. While most research focuses on physicians, allied health professionals (AHPs) also play a critical role in diagnostic processes. Existing studies, primarily based on medical-record reviews, often overlook communication gaps and team dynamics affecting diagnostic accuracy. This study aims to (1) describe the overall characteristics and patterns of diagnostic errors reported in the national adverse-event database and (2) compare the clinical features, diagnostic processes and contributing factors between cases involving physicians and those involving AHPs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We examined diagnostic-error reports from 1631 hospitals in the Japan Council for Quality Healthcare database (2010&ndash;2023). Cases were identified using predefined keywords, and two independent physicians assessed them using the Revised Safer Dx Instrument and Diagnostic Error Evaluation and Research (DEER) taxonomy. Contributing factors were analysed, and statistical methods explored error patterns and stakeholder comparisons.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 147 654 event reports, 445 cases involved diagnostic errors. The most common errors occurred in diagnostic testing, assessment and follow-up, particularly misinterpretation of pathological or radiological reports on new injuries during hospitalisation. Physicians were the primary responsible providers (79.3%), while nurses were involved in 19.3% of cases. DEER taxonomy analysis revealed that nurses were more associated with errors in presentation, history-taking and physical examination (p&lt;0.001). Additionally, patient-related factors, observation, reporting and training played a significantly greater role in errors involving nurses than physicians (p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>By leveraging expert-assessed unstructured data, this study provides a broader perspective on diagnostic safety. Findings highlight the critical role of AHPs in diagnostic errors. Our study underscores the need for targeted, profession-specific interventions embedded within broader interprofessional initiatives to effectively reduce diagnostic errors and enhance patient safety.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shimizu, I., Shikino, K., Harada, Y., Kurihara, M., Tanaka, K., Masuda, Y., Watanuki, S., Ohishi, Y., Nakazato, T., Ishizuka, K., Komatsu, M., Miyagami, T., Nishizawa, T., Nishimura, R., Oshita, T., Suzuki, T., Shimizu, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-24T21:27:58-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003419</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003419</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Differences in contributing factors to diagnostic errors between physicians and allied health professionals: a nationwide analysis in Japan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003419</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003419</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003565?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mortality related to procedural sedation and analgesia: a 10-year review of a nationwide medical adverse events database]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003565?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) is generally considered safe, yet fatal events remain poorly characterised across procedures and specialties. We retrospectively reviewed the Japan Council for Quality Health Care nationwide adverse-event database (2012&ndash;2021), searching narrative reports with 40 Japanese keywords for sedation terms and drug names. Only reports in which PSA was deemed the primary cause of death were included; non-procedural sedation, planned general anaesthesia and procedure-induced injuries were excluded. Among 10 011 reports identified via keyword search, 805 described deaths and 23 were attributed to PSA. Fatalities clustered in gastroenterology (73.9%), particularly endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP; 34.8%). Most cases were high-risk patients aged 70&ndash;89 years (65.2%) and retrospectively classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status III/IV (87%), yet no anaesthetist involvement was documented. Oxygen desaturation was the earliest sign of deterioration (56.5%), and capnography was not documented in any case. When PSA fatalities in Japan are examined across procedures and specialties, gastrointestinal interventions&mdash;especially ERCP&mdash;predominate in our cohort; however, the absence of procedure-specific denominators warrants cautious interpretation. Targeted safety measures, in line with current national sedation guidelines, including enhanced presedation evaluation, anaesthetist involvement for high-risk patients and routine capnography, may help to reduce PSA-related mortality.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Takase, H., Fukano, K., Hayashi, M., Miyamoto, Y., Izuta, K., Matsuoka, Y., Norii, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-24T21:27:58-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003565</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003565</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mortality related to procedural sedation and analgesia: a 10-year review of a nationwide medical adverse events database]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003565</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003565</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003600?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Optimising acid-base balance in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: a quality improvement initiative]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003600?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) is commonly associated with disturbances in acid-base balance. Studies have shown that correcting metabolic acidosis in CKD offers several clinical benefits, including slower disease progression and reduced mortality. Acidosis can be addressed with oral sodium bicarbonate, an easy-to-administer and relatively inexpensive treatment compared with novel drugs such as sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 -(SGLT-2) inhibitors. Although sodium bicarbonate is frequently prescribed in CKD, less attention is paid as to whether serum bicarbonate levels are adequately optimised. This project aimed to increase the proportion of advanced CKD patients with serum bicarbonate levels within the normal range.</p>
<p>Retrospective data collection was conducted at our tertiary renal centre to establish baseline bicarbonate levels and assess prescribing practices for sodium bicarbonate. Quality improvement (QI) methodology was then applied to implement a series of interventions designed to increase awareness of acidosis and to promote the appropriate use of oral sodium bicarbonate.</p>
<p>Results from baseline data collection showed that 94% of patients had a serum bicarbonate level checked within the previous 6 months. However, only 46% of patients had levels within the optimal range. Although initial improvement was noted following our first intervention, this was not sustained through subsequent QI cycles, and the proportion of patients with optimal bicarbonate levels remained largely unchanged by the end of the project.</p>
<p>Optimising serum bicarbonate is an important component of the management of advanced CKD. While this project led to increased awareness and short-term gains, further work is required to achieve lasting improvements and embed change into routine practice.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Desai, L., Baharani, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-24T21:27:58-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003600</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003600</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Optimising acid-base balance in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: a quality improvement initiative]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003600</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003600</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003742?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of survivorship stories on the interdisciplinary critical care team: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003742?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Importance</st>
<p>Healthcare providers (HCPs) working in intensive care units (ICUs) face high levels of stress, burnout and emotional exhaustion. There is limited research on interventions that foster resilience and connection among interdisciplinary ICU teams. Storytelling, particularly through ICU patient survivorship narratives, may offer a novel approach to improving team morale, reducing burnout and enhancing workplace belongingness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore the impact of ICU survivor stories on the interdisciplinary ICU team&rsquo;s perceptions of their role in survivorship, resilience, burnout and sense of belonging at work.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design, setting and participants</st>
<p>This qualitative study used a cross-sectional survey and focus group design at a large academic hospital. Participants included 39 members of the ICU interdisciplinary team who reviewed ICU survivor profiles and completed a survey. A subset of participants engaged in focus groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Analysis</st>
<p>Survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Open-ended survey responses and focus group transcripts underwent thematic analysis using descriptive and in vivo coding, followed by consensus-based theme development.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>All survey items had mean scores above 3.0, indicating overall agreement with the positive impact of the survivor profiles. Six key themes emerged from qualitative analysis: validation and closure, learning and growth, gratitude, team building and collaboration, burnout and sense of belonging. Participants reported that the profiles provided emotional closure, reinforced the value of their work and fostered interdisciplinary appreciation. Some participants noted disparities in recognition across disciplines, highlighting opportunities for more inclusive team-building strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>ICU survivor stories may serve as a meaningful intervention to support emotional well-being, reduce burnout and enhance team cohesion among critical care providers. These narratives offer a humanising perspective on patient recovery and may help staff reconnect with the purpose behind their work. Future research should explore the long-term impact of such interventions and their potential to improve both provider well-being and patient care outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dorn, S. U., Van Dussen, D., Poole, A. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-24T21:27:58-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003742</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003742</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of survivorship stories on the interdisciplinary critical care team: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003742</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003742</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003568?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating the impact of a structured medication optimisation review on prescribing patterns and bleeding risk among patients prescribed direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs): a difference-in-differences study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003568?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate the safety of implementing structured medication optimisation reviews (SMORs) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) prescribed direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). SMORs aimed to improve quality of care and facilitate large-scale alignment with national prescribing guidance (to switch patients onto edoxaban).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>Complex intervention including a SMOR embedded within primary care electronic patient records alongside clinical decision support tools.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Doubly robust difference-in-difference analysis using linked electronic health records, comparing changes in prescribing and bleeding admissions in patients undergoing SMOR with those in patients not reviewed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Sefton (intervention area) and Liverpool (comparator area) in the Northwest of England.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>All patients with AF prescribed a DOAC in 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcomes and measures</st>
<p>Proportion of patients prescribed apixaban, proportion of patients prescribed edoxaban and rate of emergency hospital admissions for bleeding-related events.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The proportion of patients in Sefton prescribed edoxaban increased from 19% to 35%; 13% (95% CI 11% to 14%) of the increase was associated with the SMOR. There was an 11-percentage point decrease in patients prescribed apixaban (95% CI &ndash;12% to &ndash;10%). Undergoing review was associated with a non-significant reduction in the risk of bleeding admissions (eight fewer admissions per 1000 people reviewed per year; 95% CI &ndash;22 to 6).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>SMORs can be delivered at scale and used to switch medications for a large proportion of people. There was no evidence of an increased risk of admissions for bleeding complications in AF patients following a large-scale switch from apixaban to edoxaban supported by SMORs. Such reviews could improve prescribing quality and patient safety by ensuring patients are on the most appropriate dose and choice of DOAC and lead to cost savings to health services (by facilitating a switch to a better value product) while not increasing risks for patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Camacho, E. M., Butters, O., Daras, K., Downing, J., Bateman, J., Lynch, S., Buchan, I. E., Barr, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-21T21:09:55-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003568</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003568</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating the impact of a structured medication optimisation review on prescribing patterns and bleeding risk among patients prescribed direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs): a difference-in-differences study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003568</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003568</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003379?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Implementation of a unit-specific quality improvement process for prevention of hospital-acquired pressure injuries]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003379?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) occur in 3%&ndash;34% of patients admitted to hospitals worldwide. Early intervention of an HAPI prevention process can help prevent or reduce HAPIs. The aim of this study was to develop a hospital unit-specific quality improvement process (QIP) focused on sacral HAPI prevention. A sudden increase in sacral HAPIs within an acute care intensive care unit (ICU) during 2022 at a 308-bed acute care hospital prompted concern with current practices in patient turning and repositioning. Within a Plan-Do-Check-Act format QIP in an adult ICU-specific QIP, the following areas were addressed (1) assessment planning using staff surveys, fishbone diagram, run chart data collection and failure mode effect analysis, (2) do processes with staff education, product utilisation that included glide sheets, 30&deg; offloading wedges and drypads, and flow revamp, (3) ongoing data review through run chart interpretation and (4) acting within the multidisciplinary team to hold the gain. Following initial implementation of the 30&deg; offloading wedges during January 2023, the rate of sacral HAPIs decreased from 18 to 4.6 per 1000 patient days per month. During a 3-month period that included full implementation of an ICU-specific QIP and use of glide sheets, 30&deg; offloading wedges and drypads, the total number of sacral HAPIs decreased to one. Overall, the mean rate of sacral HAPIs per 1000 patient days per month decreased from 4.49&plusmn;5.31 during 2022 to 2.30&plusmn;2.21 during 2023, representing an approximate decrease of 50%. The total number of sacral HAPIs decreased from 24 in 2022 to nine in 2023. The improvement has been sustained with one HAPI noted for 2024 and zero HAPIs for 2025 through April. The implementation of an ICU-specific QIP and combined use of friction-reducing glide sheets, 30&deg; offloading wedges and full body drypads was successful at decreasing the sacral HAPIs.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kern, B. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-19T23:16:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003379</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003379</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Implementation of a unit-specific quality improvement process for prevention of hospital-acquired pressure injuries]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003379</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003379</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003491?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Specialist medication monitoring and prescribing in primary care: case study of shared care agreements in Northern England, UK]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003491?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Shared care agreements (SCAs) in the UK enable general practitioners (GPs) in primary care to take over the monitoring and prescribing of specialist medications for patients under agreed protocols. While SCAs are intended to improve access and continuity of care, concerns regarding their implementation and adherence to safety protocols persist. This study aims to explore the mechanisms, challenges and risks associated with SCAs, focusing on their impact on patient safety and primary care capacity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A case-study approach was employed to investigate the implementation of SCAs, incorporating mixed methods to provide a comprehensive understanding. Data triangulation included document analysis of policies, cross-sectional review of medication monitoring and prescribing practices across 37 GP practices, and key informant interviews with stakeholders. Logic and dark logic models were iteratively developed to map the intended and unintended outcomes of SCAs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The monitoring and prescribing review revealed 32.3% of prescribed medications under SCAs lacked up-to-date monitoring data, with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder medications showing the highest rates of non-compliance. Interviews highlighted systemic challenges, including unclear responsibilities, inadequate patient involvement, fragmented communication between primary and secondary care, and insufficient integration of digital systems. These gaps contribute to patient safety risks, particularly for high-risk medications requiring stringent monitoring.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>SCAs hold potential for improving care continuity but face significant operational and systemic barriers that undermine their safety and effectiveness. Findings evidence the need for clearer role delineation, robust communication frameworks, enhanced patient engagement and integrated digital solutions. Policy-makers and healthcare leaders must address these challenges to ensure SCAs deliver on their promise of seamless, safe and sustainable care. Future research should focus on incorporating the perspectives of secondary care providers and pharmacists to develop more inclusive solutions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cooper, M., Trotter, V., Hand, A., Nazar, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-19T23:16:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003491</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003491</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Specialist medication monitoring and prescribing in primary care: case study of shared care agreements in Northern England, UK]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003491</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003491</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003524?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reducing drug-related harm by triggering proactive outreach]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003524?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st>
<p>Drug-related deaths (DRDs) remain a global issue, with Scotland reporting the second-highest rate per million population. Although some areas have seen improvements, DRDs continue to rise in parts of the Scottish Highlands. Proactive outreach to those at highest risk is believed to reduce harm. This project tested and implemented a risk identification tool&mdash;the Trigger Checklist (TC)&mdash;to initiate assertive outreach in a remote Highland area by September 2023.</p>
<p>The Model for Improvement was used to structure the improvement process. This included collaborative exploration of the problem and solution, development of the TC, devising a family of measures and Plan, Do, Study, Act cycles to structure interactive learning and refinement of the TC and outreach process. Data were collected on the number of completed TC, the percentage of those outreached within 48 hours and the number of days between incidents of non-fatal overdoses (NFOD). Timely staff experience feedback was gathered using a visual facial analogue scale.</p>
<p>A standardised TC was devised and tested. 48 TCs were received over 8 months. Of those 100% (n=48) were assertively outreached within 48 hours of a TC referral. The median number of days between NFOD increased from 6.5 days (January&ndash;August 2022) to 23 days (September 2022&ndash;August 2023). There was an increase in the number of days between incidents of NFOD locally, with more than 90 days between two events (previously the maximum number reached was 48). For the duration of the project, the locality did not receive a DRD notification.</p>
<p>There is a need to further test and standardise the use of the TC in other areas frequented by those most at risk of drug-related harm, such as the remote and rural emergency department.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Campbell, L., Fraser, B., Beattie, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-19T23:16:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003524</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003524</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reducing drug-related harm by triggering proactive outreach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003524</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003524</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003576?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Increasing the rate of nursing process implementation: a quality improvement project at Wollega University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, 2025]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003576?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The nursing process is sytematic patient centered care that promotes a holistic approach, enhances communication and collaboration among healthcare professionals and ensures the delivery of high-quality, individualised care. Despite different efforts to improve the nursing process in Wollega University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, the rate of its implementation is very low due to different factors. This quality improvement project aimed to increase the rate of nursing process implementation at Wollega University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital from 1 August 2024 to 30 January 2025.</p>
<p>The team project identified root causes by using a fishbone diagram and a driven diagram. Six interventions were introduced over 6 months using Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. The interventions were training of nurses and leaders, shifting of nurses to wards with more workload, providing clear job descriptions for nurses, availing of protocols and work aids, availing of nursing process formats and providing regular supportive supervision.</p>
<p>Finally, the rate of nursing process implementation increased from 27% to 87.5%, with assessment performed properly in 93%, diagnosis increased to 89.5%, planning reached 86.5%, implementation 85.5% and evaluation 83%. The highest (96%) performance was observed in the orthopaedic ward, whereas the lowest (79%) was in the gynaecological ward.</p>
<p>This project improved the implementation of the nursing process, demonstrating the importance of capacity building for staff, leadership engagement, effective communication, regular discussion and supervision, as well as collecting feedback and incorporating it for the next interventions. The project significantly improved nursing process implementation by introducing change ideas, and it now needs to be expanded to other units. The management of the hospital and all stakeholders owned the project to maintain its sustainability.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tolera, G. G., Badasa, K., Deressa, H., Fayera, H., Chala, M., Deyasa, M., Teshome, S., Edessa, D., Etefa, A., Akuma, A. O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-19T23:16:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003576</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003576</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Increasing the rate of nursing process implementation: a quality improvement project at Wollega University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, 2025]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003576</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003576</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003657?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Care Left Undone Among Physicians: An Explorative Thematic Analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003657?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The concept of care left undone has been extensively studied among nurses, limited research has examined how physicians experience and respond when care is left undone. Understanding physicians&rsquo; perspectives is needed for developing more comprehensive strategies to enhance care quality and safety.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore how physicians conceptualise, experience and manage care left undone.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 12 physicians active in a tertiary teaching hospital. Thematic analysis was guided by existing literature on missed care but allowed inductive insights to emerge from the data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Physicians were generally unfamiliar with the term &lsquo;care left undone&rsquo;, yet readily identified with the phenomenon when described, conceptualising it as a routine aspect of clinical practice shaped by time scarcity, competing demands and professional judgement. High workload, understaffing and a multitude of responsibilities were identified as main antecedents of care left undone. Omissions most frequently involved administrative tasks, psychosocial support and communication, which were deprioritised relative to diagnostic and therapeutic tasks to mitigate any negative effects on patient outcomes. Strategies to navigate care left undone included implicit triage and task delegation, often framed as expressions of clinical expertise rather than deficiencies. Reported consequences included compromised patient safety, disrupted continuity of care and adverse emotional and professional impacts on physicians, such as moral distress and burnout. Proposed solutions were identified at the organisational (eg, staffing, workload reduction, supportive environment), interpersonal (eg, enhanced collaboration) and patient levels (eg, health literacy and engagement). A cross-cutting meta-theme of professional identity and role boundaries shaped how physicians perceived, rationalised and responded to care left undone, highlighting the need for interdisciplinary, context-sensitive interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Care left undone is a relevant yet underexplored phenomenon among physicians active in acute care hospitals. Addressing care left undone requires profession-sensitive approaches that account for differences in role structure, decision-making autonomy and identity. Quality improvement initiatives should include physicians in the co-design of interventions to ensure they reflect clinical realities and foster engagement.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dello, S., De Smet, K., Sermeus, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-19T23:16:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003657</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003657</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Care Left Undone Among Physicians: An Explorative Thematic Analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003657</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003657</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003663?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Physician and patient perspectives on PROM implementation barriers in spine care and pain management: a mixed-methods assessment]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003663?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are vital for patient-centred care but face implementation challenges. Within the participating academic medical centre&rsquo;s spine care and pain management clinics, PROMs were collected but underused, indicating a quality gap.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To identify and compare physician and patient perspectives on priorities, barriers and preferences for PROM implementation to inform a quality improvement initiative.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation (October 2024&ndash;December 2024) in two outpatient clinics. Data included quantitative surveys assessing priorities and challenges from physicians (N=8) and patients (N=35), and qualitative data from physician meeting field notes, patient interaction field notes and open-ended survey responses. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively; qualitative data underwent thematic analysis. Findings were integrated using triangulation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Physicians and patients aligned on prioritising pain interference and physical function. However, patients prioritised pain severity and personal goals more highly than physicians. While 70% of patients found PROMs useful, only 24% reported discussing PROM findings with providers, and 75% of clinicians responded &lsquo;not at all confident&rsquo; to a question about score interpretation. Implementation challenges diverged significantly: physicians universally (100%) cited perceived patient time burden as a barrier, but this concern was infrequently shared by patients (11.4%). Physicians also cited workflow integration as a barrier (87.5%), while patients primarily prioritised PROM format/design (37.1%) and relevance (28.6%). Five qualitative themes emerged across patients and physicians: (1) critiques of PROM content/fidelity; (2) disconnect between data collection and clinical integration; (3) prioritising function and patient-centred goals; (4) need for flexibility, customisation and communication and (5) system-level barriers influencing implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Gaps exist between PROM collection and meaningful clinical use in this setting, driven by content limitations, workflow barriers, system issues and divergent stakeholder perspectives. Improving PROM implementation requires a multistakeholder approach prioritising function-focused, relevant measures integrated effectively into clinical workflows and support by system-level changes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rassu, F. S., Johnson, S. M., Barron, D. S., Kalpakjian, C. Z., Slavin, M. D., Daneshvar, D. H., Isaac, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-19T23:16:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003663</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003663</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Physician and patient perspectives on PROM implementation barriers in spine care and pain management: a mixed-methods assessment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003663</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003663</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003531?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving departmental Quality Improvement Plans through standardisation, structured peer-to-peer feedback and building improvement capacity and culture]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003531?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Quality Improvement Plans (QIPs) can improve healthcare quality by raising awareness and providing a focus for improvement efforts. The physician-led quality committee at our institution set out to improve the previously heterogenous quality and content of clinical department QIPs and increase alignment between clinical department and hospital quality improvement (QI) priorities. We describe these initiatives and assess their impact on the quality of departmental QIPs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The Physician Quality Committee at our academic tertiary care hospital implemented a series of interventions, including a peer-to-peer feedback mechanism, longitudinal education and coaching, standardised QI project templates and efforts to facilitate culture change. The QIPs from 13 clinical departments were reviewed for the years before (2018&ndash;2019) and after the interventions (2022&ndash;2023) and scored according to a structured rubric, created by consensus among physician quality leads. Data are reported as means and medians (IQR). A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to evaluate for statistical significance. A Likert-scale survey was used to assess physician QI leads&rsquo; perception of the impact of the initiatives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The mean score on the structured rubric was 4.4/12 for the QIPs from 2018 to 2019 and 8.0/12 for the QIPs from 2022 to 2023 (Z=3.06, p=0.0005). The median score (25th, 75th percentile) in 2018&ndash;2019 was 4.5 (3.5, 5.13), which increased to 8.5 (7.0, 9.0) in 2022&ndash;2023. The survey response for physician QI leads was 10/13 (76.9%). The most positive response was the QI lead&rsquo;s knowledge and understanding of how to structure a QI project (mean score of 4.4/5); the least positive response was related to departmental focus and clarity regarding QI priorities (mean score of 3.9/5).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Multifaceted physician-led interventions resulted in improvements in the quality and content of clinical department QIPs, improved physician knowledge of QI methodology, enhanced focus and clarity around departmental QI priorities, and improved awareness of hospital-wide improvement efforts.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hobbs, H., Calder-Sprackman, S., Wilkinson, A., Digby, G. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-16T20:31:25-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003531</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003531</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving departmental Quality Improvement Plans through standardisation, structured peer-to-peer feedback and building improvement capacity and culture]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003531</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003531</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003435?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Why health services should use generic PROMs and PREMs]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003435?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <sec id="s1"><st>Introduction</st> <p>Understanding the effectiveness of treatment and experience is key to improving health outcomes and service delivery. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) provide one way of doing this. These questionnaires allow healthcare providers to collect information about patients&rsquo; views of their outcomes and the experience they have received.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> With feedback from these measures, healthcare organisations can create care that is more patient-centred, improve service delivery and promote informed decision-making. However, despite their benefits, few healthcare services have succeeded in implementing them effectively.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref></p> <p>This paper explores the benefits of generic PROMs and PREMs and challenges to their implementation. The focus of PROMs is on the patient. PROMs help healthcare providers track each patient&rsquo;s progress over time, compare pretreatment with post-treatment outcomes and support shared decision-making.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> For example, a patient receiving physiotherapy for knee pain may fill out a PROM...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benson, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-13T03:39:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003435</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003435</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Why health services should use generic PROMs and PREMs]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003435</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003435</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003563?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving care for patients with severe eating disorders in a university hospital without a formal eating disorder service]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003563?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Eating disorders affect 1%&ndash;4% of the population and anorexia nervosa has the highest mortality rate of all mental disorders. Medical Emergencies in Eating Disorders guidelines guide the management of severely medically unwell patients with anorexia nervosa who require medical admission. Locally, incidents had raised concerns around deviations in care locally from guideline-based care, and we aimed to improve care and seek full compliance with guidelines.</p>
<p>The management of patients with severe eating disorders in the past year at our hospital was evaluated, and the Hospital Information System was interrogated for patients with eating disorders who might not have been identified clinically. In consultation with staff, a pathway was agreed to optimise identification and treatment of eating disorders in patients presenting to hospital. We developed a resource pack to guide care and delivered education to relevant clinical areas: emergency department, general medicine and psychiatry, including using simulation-based training where appropriate.</p>
<p>Concordance with guideline-based care rose from 27% prior to this intervention to 100% afterwards. Each new patient with a suspected eating disorder represented a new plan-do-see-act cycle, allowing development of the project with each episode of patient care. There was an improvement in overall confidence in the identification and management of eating disorder in the hospital.</p>
<p>This process highlighted that implementing a small change in patient care requires extensive consultation. The patient story was key to engaging stakeholders as it illustrated the impact on the individual patient. At 6-month follow-up, six patients have been treated via the pathway. These numbers may seem small, but this is a rare condition with a high mortality rate, and there is no room for error. The project has improved the management of patients with severe eating disorders in the general hospital setting.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doherty, A. M., Flynn, C., Goulding, C., Spooner, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-13T03:39:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003563</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003563</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving care for patients with severe eating disorders in a university hospital without a formal eating disorder service]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003563</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003563</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003416?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['Leanomics in healthcare: a three-year quality improvement study on the financial impact of a modified Kanban system in hospital storerooms]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003416?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Manual inventory management in hospital storerooms often relies on visual estimation, leading to inaccuracies and inefficiencies such as overstocking and out-stocking. Our audit revealed that a medical inpatient unit incurs weekly consumable costs of QAR 31 000 (US$8500), underscoring the financial impact of these inefficiences. While traditional Kanban systems have proven financially effective in specialty units, their use in inpatient settings is limited, and data on their financial impact in Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) healthcare systems are scarce. This study aims to redesign the traditional Kanban system and evaluate its long-term financial and operational impact.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We applied the Model for Improvement framework while using Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to test and refine interventions. The traditional Kanban system was redesigned by introducing replenishment triggers, adopting bin systems, implementing Kanban boards, and standardizing Kanban quantities based on the frequency of consumable use. Impact was assessed using statistical process control charts generated with QI Macros software. Outcome measures included total weekly consumable costs; process measures assessed staff compliance with the Kanban system; and balance measures tracked out-stocking rates and staff satisfaction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Over three years, the modified Kanban system reduced weekly costs by 40&ndash;50%, from QAR 31 000 (US$8500) to QAR 19 000 (US$5100) during testing and stabilised at QAR 16 000 (US$4300) post-implementation. Staff satisfaction increased from 79% to 90%, driven by improved workflow and inventory tracking. Out-stocking rates declined from 0.04 to 0.02 per 1000 inpatient days during testing, ultimately reaching near zero after implementation. Compliance improved from 76% to 95%, directly contributing to both cost savings and operational efficiency.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The modified Kanban system effectively reduces costs, enhances staff satisfaction and improves operational efficiency by minimising stockouts. This study underscores the value of quality improvement and lean methodologies, such as Kanban, in optimising healthcare supply chains and reducing waste.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Logrono, K. J., Zu'bi, B. S. M., Siddiqui, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-12T01:02:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003416</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003416</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA['Leanomics in healthcare: a three-year quality improvement study on the financial impact of a modified Kanban system in hospital storerooms]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003416</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003416</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003369?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving staff awareness of sensory aid needs and dementia status in an old age ward]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003369?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Having initially done our critical appraisal of various studies, we found that geriatric wards have a higher prevalence of delirium and dementia. Among this older population, sensory aids were found to be important in orientating delirious patients, and deficits in vision/hearing were associated with an increased risk of delirium. Delirium and dementia are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This quality improvement project aimed to increase staff awareness of patient sensory aid needs and thus improve patient care as a result.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We started off with a driver diagram to identify what the primary and secondary drivers are for improving the quality of care for patients with sensory impairment. Of the drivers discussed, we believed that we could have a meaningful impact on improving sensory impairment awareness among the multidisciplinary team (MDT) on the ward. We then went through our Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycles, which were as follows: PDSA cycle 1, where I and my two colleagues educated the MDT on how to use the electronic patient records property form checklist, which was being underused. This form tracks whether patients require sensory aids. We did three teaching sessions during board rounds and audited the use of this form over time. PDSA cycle 2 used a laminated bedside checklist that is filled in by the MDT and is used as a visual reminder of the patient&rsquo;s sensory impairment status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The EPR form completion rate increased by 14% over a period of 4 weeks, although this was not statistically significant. 18% of the bedside checklists were filled in, which was statistically significant. Both interventions in combination led to a statistically significant increase in sensory impairment awareness, with a 32% decrease in sensory aid unknown rates, a 40% decrease in dementia unknown rates and a 56% decrease in both sensory and dementia unknown rates. Delirium status was not formally assessed in this QIP due to documentation inconsistencies; however, its relevance remains acknowledged.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arifaj, B., Shakeel, A., Nyam, L., Sansom-Ninnes, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-07T01:07:06-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003369</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003369</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving staff awareness of sensory aid needs and dementia status in an old age ward]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003369</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003369</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003255?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Optimising drowning prevention counselling through a physician Maintenance of Certification (MOC) quality improvement (QI) initiative]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003255?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Drowning is the leading cause of death in children 1&ndash;4 years old in the USA. Paediatricians play an important role in giving anticipatory guidance on drowning prevention. This quality improvement initiative aimed to increase the rate of drowning prevention counselling with provision of educational materials to caregivers of children aged 0&ndash;10 years during clinical encounters in an outpatient setting.</p>
<p>We refined a previously published Texas state educational programme that included evidence-based counselling strategies across three Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) cycles, with the addition of preintervention baseline counselling phase during expansion of the programme nationally to 17 and 21 states in 2022 and 2023, respectively. All participating paediatricians in office-based, urgent care and emergency settings completed demographic, preintervention and postintervention and programme evaluation surveys. Paediatricians in office-based settings (majority of participants) tracked counselling rate across baseline and three PDSA cycles. Caregivers completed postintervention surveys on knowledge and anticipated behaviour change. Drowning prevention education was supplemented by materials provided to caregivers including brochures and wearable water watcher tags to promote adult supervision.</p>
<p>During the first 2 years of national expansion, 120 physicians and 7886 caregivers participated in the programme. Provision of drowning prevention educational materials to caregivers significantly closed an existing gap. Less than 25% of caregivers reported receipt of brochure/checklist and only 6% water watcher tag at baseline; compared with 98% and over 90%, respectively, after PDSA 3 in both years. 69.3% of physicians were able to efficiently counsel on drowning prevention within 2 mins in 2022 versus 82.1% in 2023 (p value&lt;0.001). Most caregivers found the counselling helpful and planned to use the water safety strategies. We demonstrated a significant increase in mean counselling rate from preintervention phase (26.8%) through end of PDSA 3 (64.9%) in this national programme.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McCallin, T. E., Arredondo, A. R., Camp, E. A., Yusuf, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-04T21:23:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003255</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003255</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Optimising drowning prevention counselling through a physician Maintenance of Certification (MOC) quality improvement (QI) initiative]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003255</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003255</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003470?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Increasing MRI capacity at a clinical diagnostic centre and a trauma hospital using artificial intelligence-based image reconstruction (AI-IR): a quality improvement project using the Model for Improvement framework]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003470?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Increasing MRI capacity is of primary importance to both NHS England and individual radiology departments. Consequently, central funding was provided to allow trusts to instal artificial intelligence-enabled image reconstruction (AI-IR) on their MRI scanners, with the stated aim of increasing capacity by two patients scanned per day within a year of installation on a given scanner. This work demonstrates how a two-phase quality improvement (QI) initiative can be followed to increase capacity using AI-IR in a community diagnostic centre (CDC) at Mile End Hospital and an acute trauma centre, the Royal London Hospital, in East London with comprehensive stakeholders&rsquo; engagement.</p>
<p>The Model for Improvement framework was used. Our pilot study focused on 3 Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles for three anatomies in musculoskeletal (MSK) imaging at our CDC. A second, substantive study at our major trauma centre was followed, which was a 20-month project encompassing all MSK anatomies of interest.</p>
<p>In our initial pilot study at the CDC, we were able to reduce booking times by 10 min for Knee, Ankle and Spine protocols. In our wide-ranging MSK programme at our trauma centre, we saved on average of 07:26 min per scan and while an increased throughput was not achieved, an increase in complex patients being scanned, from 7% to 15% was achieved, reducing healthcare inequities.</p>
<p>Our two-centre study suggests that engaging with stakeholders in a structured QI programme can significantly reduce scanning times, improve patient experience and allow for longer precare and postcare time. Additionally, significant throughput increase at the CDC for low-risk ambulatory patients suggests efforts to increase capacity using this technology should be focused at such centres and other scanners focused on ambulatory outpatients, while for scanners focused on inpatients, paediatrics and A&amp;E at trauma centres, the time saved can be used to increase the capacity for complex patients, reducing waiting times for these patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin, J., Hurcum, Z., Cross, S., Pepito Ablen, F., Sivarajah, S., Papoutsaki, M. V., Adams, D., Peplinski, A. M., Jalan, R., Ambalawaner, K., Bennett, R., Vaidya, S., Pefanis, D., Moeen, S., Ganeshalingham, S., Ahmad, M., Dupreez, H., Proudlove, N., Miquel, M. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-04T21:23:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003470</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003470</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Increasing MRI capacity at a clinical diagnostic centre and a trauma hospital using artificial intelligence-based image reconstruction (AI-IR): a quality improvement project using the Model for Improvement framework]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003470</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003470</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003551?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sustainability and cost avoidance of reduced inappropriate red blood cell transfusion at community hospitals in Niagara Region: a follow-up analysis on a quality improvement initiative]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003551?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Inappropriate packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions increase patient risk and healthcare costs. Initial audits at Niagara Health (Ontario, Canada) revealed only 85% and 54% compliance with Choosing Wisely Canada guidelines for pre-transfusion hemoglobin (&le;80 g/L) and single-unit transfusion, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a nonrandomized, interrupted time-series Quality Improvement Project (QIP) using the Model for Improvement. Interventions included technologist-led prospective screening of pRBC orders, policy updates, and educational campaigns. Outcome measures were rates of inappropriate transfusions based on hemoglobin and single-unit criteria; balancing measures included transfusion-related adverse events. Sustainability was assessed using Statistical Process Control charts. Cost analysis estimated savings using an activity-based cost of $C1500 per pRBC unit.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Initial implementation improved compliance to 90% (pre-transfusion hemoglobin) and 71% (single-unit) within three months. Extended analysis (2021&ndash;2024) demonstrated sustained rates of 90% and 77%, respectively. At the St. Catharines Site, monthly median transfusions decreased from 273 to 173 units, yielding a 56% reduction in RBC utilization and 44% cost savings amounting to $C5052000.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Technologist-led screening achieved sustained improvements in transfusion appropriateness, leading to substantial cost savings. Variability across sites underscores the need for further research on contextual factors influencing future QIP success.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fang, A., Rana, H., Khowaja, A., Refaei, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-31T02:18:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003551</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003551</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sustainability and cost avoidance of reduced inappropriate red blood cell transfusion at community hospitals in Niagara Region: a follow-up analysis on a quality improvement initiative]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003551</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003551</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003571?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring patient safety culture and opportunities for improvement: a mixed-methods study in a Dutch paediatric intensive care unit]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003571?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Hospitals often face complex and life-threatening situations that heighten the risk of medical errors. Improving patient safety culture is important to reduce these errors. This study aims to identify trends in patient safety culture within a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and to explore strategies for improvement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The study had a mixed-methods design, combining quantitative and qualitative methods, and was done at the PICU of Sophia Children&rsquo;s Hospital (Rotterdam, The Netherlands). The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) was used to measure patient safety culture, with surveys administered in 2009, 2012, 2014, 2017, 2019 and 2023. Trends in patient safety culture over time were analysed. Additionally, staff members provided recommendations to improve patient safety, which were subsequently categorised into overarching themes. An expert panel was convened and interviews with staff members were conducted to further evaluate the most frequently mentioned recommendations and assess their relevance and feasibility for implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>From 2009 to 2023, patient safety culture demonstrated overall improvement. However, specific domains, including stress recognition, perceptions of management and working conditions, still show room for further improvement. Most recommendations identified through the SAQ fell within the themes of interprofessional communication, medical equipment and hospital working environment, and staffing. Concrete suggestions included appointing a dedicated contact person to improve communication with parents and establishing clear agreements to strengthen communication and teamwork within the PICU.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The patient safety culture at the PICU of Sophia Children&rsquo;s Hospital improved over the years, although areas for improvement remain. Sustained improvements in patient safety culture require continuous investment in interprofessional communication, workplace conditions and staffing. This study not only highlights long-term trends but also presents actionable strategies proposed by staff to address persistent challenges. Effective implementation and ongoing evaluation of these interventions are essential to strengthen safety culture, enhance staff well-being and ultimately improve patient outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Autar, K. U. D., van den Bos-Boon, A., van Heesch, G. G. M., van Dijk, M., Poley, M. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-31T02:18:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003571</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003571</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring patient safety culture and opportunities for improvement: a mixed-methods study in a Dutch paediatric intensive care unit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003571</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003571</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003407?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development and pilot of the BC Wildfire Smoke and Extreme Heat Action Plan: empowering patients with climate health readiness]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003407?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Globally, wildfire smoke and extreme heat events are increasing in frequency and intensity. Western Canada, including the Province of British Columbia (BC), is impacted annually by these events, resulting in the accelerated development of public health messaging and emergency preparedness. It is particularly important to reach, educate and empower individuals who are highly susceptible to climate events, such as those with respiratory diseases, through targeted communication strategies delivered by trusted sources. We aimed to develop an evidence-informed action plan (AP) tool and pilot integration into clinical encounters with patients living with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p>
<p>The project team developed a draft tool&mdash;a BC Wildfire Smoke and Extreme Heat AP document inspired by the concept of an Asthma AP&mdash;along with a guide to support healthcare providers in addressing questions during patient counselling sessions. Iterative feedback from trained patient partners, clinicians and knowledge translation specialists was incorporated to refine messaging and delivery. Use of the tool was piloted in clinical encounters between certified respiratory educators (CREs) and patients living with asthma and COPD in two regional health authorities. Additional process and content feedback was gathered via questionnaires and focus groups.</p>
<p>Patients (project participants) reported that AP tool use increased their understanding and preparedness for wildfire smoke and extreme heat events. While the plan was positively received by providers in a CRE role, time constraints and staffing capacity were highlighted as barriers to implementation. Suggested improvements included strengthened public awareness, preseason deployment and enhancement of content and delivery. Additional quality improvement cycles are needed to increase readability, accessibility and actionability.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[He, R., Shellington, E., Barn, P., Rideout, K., Bueso, A., Joshi, I., Maddocks, S., Camp, P. G., Crocker, M., Coker, E., Afshar, T., Turvey, J., Brigham, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-29T23:28:52-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003407</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003407</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development and pilot of the BC Wildfire Smoke and Extreme Heat Action Plan: empowering patients with climate health readiness]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003407</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003407</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003364?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Counting the seconds: a quality improvement initiative to accelerate intraoperative results for arthrocentesis cell counts in a paediatric tertiary care hospital]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003364?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In paediatric patients with concern for septic arthritis, arthrocentesis may be performed under anaesthesia with intraoperative cell count determining need for surgical intervention. Shorter turnaround time (TAT) between collection and result minimises anaesthesia exposure for the patient and surgical time for the treatment team. This study evaluated a quality improvement (QI) initiative to decrease TAT to &lt;1 hour by improving interdisciplinary communication and placing visual reminders (&lsquo;stat card&rsquo;) to indicate priority handling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>206 consecutive paediatric patients who underwent arthrocentesis for the diagnosis of septic arthritis were identified. Midway through the collection period, the QI intervention (stat card) was implemented. We collected the date and time of arthrocentesis and sample verification (TAT) and calculated the proportion of TAT &lt;1 hour preintervention and postintervention. We collected variables related to the affected joint and whether the stat card was used. Operative time was calculated for those samples collected in the Operating Room (OR).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The final study population included 109 patients preintervention and 88 patients postintervention. Postintervention, the stat card was used in only 44% (20/45) of eligible cases. Compliance was highest in aspirations of the hip (75%). After adjusting for the affected joint, the odds of TAT &lt;1 hour were higher in the postintervention stat card group compared with the postintervention no stat card group (odds ratio 7.10, p=0.0147) and to the preintervention group (odds ratio 3.63, p=0.0810). There was no difference between the postintervention no stat card versus the preintervention groups (odds ratio 0.51, p=0.2524). TAT was significantly decreased when the stat card was used (42 min) compared with when it was not used (84 min) (mean difference &ndash;39.5%, p=0.0178). After adjusting for the affected joint, there was no difference in operative time across the three groups (p=0.2531).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>A multidisciplinary QI initiative for the intraoperative diagnosis of septic arthritis was effective in reducing cell count TAT but demonstrated poor compliance and failed to reduce operative time.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Purtell, S. R., Hornfeck, M., Carry, P., Winkler, T., Garg, S., Sanders, J. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-29T02:13:26-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003364</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003364</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Counting the seconds: a quality improvement initiative to accelerate intraoperative results for arthrocentesis cell counts in a paediatric tertiary care hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003364</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003364</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003518?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quality improvement project to enhance adherence to RCEM standards for patients with paracetamol overdose]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003518?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Delayed or inconsistent administration of <I>N</I>-acetylcysteine (NAC) for paracetamol overdose in the emergency department (ED) poses a risk to patient safety, with current Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) standards often not being met. The traditional 21-hour NAC regimen is associated with adverse drug reactions, medication errors and prolonged admissions. The Scottish and Newcastle Acetylcysteine Protocol (SNAP) was introduced as a simpler alternative with comparable efficacy. This quality improvement project (QIP) aimed to improve compliance with RCEM standards by implementing targeted interventions while also reducing the length of inpatient stay and maintaining patient safety.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>This QIP was conducted at Royal Derby Hospital using a multidisciplinary, systematic approach based on Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. Baseline data were collected from 100 randomly selected patients (November 2021&ndash;May 2022) and compared with outcomes during a 52-week intervention period (September 2023&ndash;August 2024). Interventions included educational sessions, quick reference materials and enhanced prescribing tools. Data were analysed for compliance with RCEM standards, adverse events (liver function derangement and anaphylactoid reactions) and system-level measures, such as length of inpatient stay and timing of paracetamol plasma levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 214 patients were included. Compliance with RCEM standard 1 improved from 36% to 43%. No change was noted for standards 2 and 3. Median inpatient stay decreased from 35 hours to 30.5 hours. No significant differences were found in adverse events. Special cause variation was identified in paracetamol plasma level timing, attributed to early sampling in some cases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This QIP addressed problems of delayed or inconsistent NAC administration in the ED by improving compliance with RCEM standard 1 and reducing inpatient stay while maintaining patient safety. Although standards 2 and 3 did not improve, the interventions proved cost-effective, feasible and scalable. Future work should focus on sustaining improvements and exploring patient-centred outcomes across diverse healthcare settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[El Nsouli, D., Chung, C., Wilkins, H., Alqeisi, T., Maqsood, M., Sandhu, R., Bate-Jones, P. E., Johnson, G. D., Jameel, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-28T01:54:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003518</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003518</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quality improvement project to enhance adherence to RCEM standards for patients with paracetamol overdose]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003518</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003518</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003459?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trying to create order in chaos--healthcare workers perspective of COVID-19 intensive care (a qualitative study)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003459?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The COVID-19 pandemic flooded intensive care units with patients needing supportive care. In Scandinavia, the greater Stockholm area was among the most affected. This study aimed to capture healthcare workers&rsquo; conditions and challenges during this prolonged crisis, including perspectives from the intensive care team.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The data consist of 22 semistructured individual interviews with regular and temporary healthcare workers involved in the intensive care of COVID-19 patients, including nurse assistants, registered nurses, critical care nurses and consultant and junior physicians. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The overarching theme that emerged was <I>trying to create order in chaos</I>.</p>
<p>The theme encompassed four categories: <I>adaptation with consequences, learning and growing while sacrificing my health, supporting and balancing staff resources without having enough,</I> and <I>challenging ICU values and standards</I>. Each category comprised multiple subcategories.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Our study demonstrates challenges and identifies workarounds, support strategies and personnel learning experienced by COVID-19 intensive care teams in delivering patient care, ensuring patient safety and managing staff resilience. The findings can be used to better prepare for future crises.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meurling, L., Escher, C., Dahl, O., Osika, W., Ruiz, M., Ericson, M., Creutzfeldt, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-23T23:03:35-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003459</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003459</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trying to create order in chaos--healthcare workers perspective of COVID-19 intensive care (a qualitative study)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003459</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003459</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003485?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Roles and responsibilities of registered nurses in the early recognition and management of sepsis in acute hospital settings: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003485?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Sepsis causes over 20% of deaths annually, with early recognition and management being key strategies to preventing patient deterioration. Despite being the largest group of hospital-based clinicians, the role of registered nurses (RNs) in sepsis remains poorly defined.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To describe the roles and responsibilities of RNs in early recognition and management of sepsis in acute hospital settings, applying the <I>Action, Actor, Context, Target</I> and <I>Time</I> (AACTT) Implementation Science Framework to specify nursing behaviours across domains, and identify evidence gaps to inform future research and practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The review was conducted using the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. We searched Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and PubMed for studies discussing the contribution of RNs in acute hospital-based sepsis care. Data were extracted and mapped to the AACTT framework domains.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>27 (90%) of 30 included studies described RNs as the <I>actor</I> responsible for the <I>action</I> of sepsis screening. 26 studies (87%) described RN <I>actions</I> relating to timely care escalation and sepsis management. A broader range of <I>actions</I> was identified in resource-restricted <I>contexts,</I> with three (10%) studies reporting RN-initiated blood tests, chest X-rays, intravenous fluids and antimicrobials.</p>
<p>Across 16 studies (53%), eight roles with dedicated focus on sepsis identification and management were identified; only one study outlined formal training requirements. Nurse practitioners were excluded here given their credentialed role and scope.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Nurses perform essential actions in early sepsis recognition and management, with several RN roles focused on sepsis care identified. A broader scope of nurse-initiated actions was identified in resource-restricted contexts to meet clinical demand. There is potential for a greater scope of nursing actions in sepsis care for the benefit of patients and health services, but to achieve this, standardised training requirements need to be developed, and scope of practice defined.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lemoh, A. Y., Rashidzada, Z., Krishnasamy, M., Wilkinson, A., Blackwood, R., Rivalland, A., Ierano, C., Thursky, K. A., Guccione, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-23T23:03:35-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003485</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003485</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Roles and responsibilities of registered nurses in the early recognition and management of sepsis in acute hospital settings: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003485</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003485</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003280?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating youth mental health service integration in Australia using the Youth Integration Project framework]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003280?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Since 2006, the Australian government has expanded access to primary mental healthcare for youth aged 12&ndash;25 years through the headspace platform. However, structural barriers exist in the integration of headspace centres with local state-funded specialised mental health services. The aim of this study was to translate an emerging service integration framework (Youth Integration Project (YIP)) into a tool to determine levels of integration between headspace and local specialist services/programme and identify areas for improving service integration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>The Rating of Integrated Health Services (RIHS) survey was developed based on the YIP framework to assess levels of youth mental health service integration in New South Wales (NSW) local health districts (LHDs). Managers of specialist services/programmes across 18 LHDs in NSW were invited to complete the RIHS survey. Responses were coded into indicators of levels of integrated care and aggregated into an overall assessment of service integration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Validity of the RIHS scales was indicated by positive correlations with independent items of service integration. In relation to integration levels, 41/56 services/programmes had minimal-to-basic levels of integration with headspace centres. The results were consistent across programmes and regions. Three structural areas of interagency collaboration were identified for improving service integration: (i) information systems, communication, products and technology; (ii) financing; and (iii) leadership, governance, policy and values.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The results provide evidence of the significantly fragmented youth mental healthcare system in Australia. There is a need to address structural aspects of service integration to improve integration between headspace and LHD services for young people.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sawrikar, V., Hodgins, M., Leung, S., Ardill-Young, O., Curtis, J., Lingam, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-22T00:00:22-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003280</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003280</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating youth mental health service integration in Australia using the Youth Integration Project framework]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003280</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003280</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003462?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reducing inappropriate transthoracic echocardiography orders in normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism in a community hospital: a quality improvement project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003462?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs) have limited value in guiding management of normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Nevertheless, TTEs are frequently ordered inappropriately. This quality improvement project aimed to decrease inappropriate TTE orders by 30% over 6 months in patients with PE admitted to general internal medicine at a community hospital. Two interventions were implemented using successive plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles: educational sessions for physicians and the distribution of TTE-ordering algorithms for triaging of TTE appropriateness. Four audits on TTE orders for inpatients with PE were conducted throughout the project: a pre-intervention audit (pre-audit; March to August 2020), a post-intervention 1 audit (post-I1; August to September 2022), a post-intervention 2 audit (post-I2; December 2022 to February 2023) and a post-intervention audit (post-audit; March to August 2023). The primary outcome measure was the proportion of inappropriate to appropriate TTE orders during the pre-intervention and post-intervention periods. During the pre-audit, post-I1, post-I2 and post-audit periods, 89, 23, 20 and 158 patients, respectively, were admitted with PEs. 37, 10, 3 and 14 patients in each of these periods, respectively, received a TTE for PE-related reasons and were therefore included in the audits. 42%, 43%, 15% and 24% of patients, respectively, received a TTE for PE-related reasons. 89%, 50%, 67% and 79% of those TTEs, respectively, were inappropriate. There was a transient decrease in inappropriate to appropriate TTE orders ratio after the first intervention (p&lt;0.005). Inappropriate investigations lead to additional healthcare costs and delays in patient care. This quality improvement project highlights an ongoing need to increase awareness surrounding TTE indications to improve appropriate utilisation. Next steps include further PDSA cycles with additional interventions to continue to try and decrease inappropriate TTE orders in the community hospital setting.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, D., Foo, A., Weera, S., Haynen, B., Refaei, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-22T00:00:22-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003462</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003462</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reducing inappropriate transthoracic echocardiography orders in normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism in a community hospital: a quality improvement project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003462</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003462</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003499?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Overcoming therapeutic inertia in primary care: a multisite quality initiative to increase guideline-based prescribing for patients with diabetes]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003499?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Therapeutic inertia (TI), the failure to intensify or de-intensify treatment when appropriate, is a contributor to poor guideline adherence in diabetes treatment, including the suboptimal use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We developed a multifaceted improvement initiative targeting TI at four academic primary care practices, aiming to increase rates of SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA use for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Prescribing trends for GLP-1RAs, SGLT-2is, sulfonylureas and insulin were compiled quarterly over a 12-month baseline period and 12-month intervention period and analysed using interrupted time series analyses. Providers completed a brief questionnaire assessing project feasibility and acceptability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>GLP-1RA prescribing showed an upward trend during both the baseline and intervention periods (+0.70% vs +0.87% per quarter; p=0.14 for difference) and increased significantly in the first intervention quarter (+1.73%; p=0.003). SGLT-2i prescribing was static during the baseline period, showed an upward trend during the intervention (0.0% vs +0.43% per quarter; p=0.05 for difference) and increased significantly in the first intervention quarter (+1.0%; p=0.03). In those prescribed a GLP-1RA or an SGLT-2i, sulfonylurea prescribing dropped significantly after intervention (&ndash;2.0% per quarter; p=0.02). Insulin prescribing rates did not change throughout the study period. There was no significant change in haemoglobin A1c among patients newly prescribed a GLP-1RA and/or an SGLT-2i during the intervention period (7.3% &plusmn;1.5% baseline vs 7.2% &plusmn;1.4% intervention period, p=0.23). Most providers indicated that they had prescribed (90%) and were more likely to prescribe (81%) GLP-1RAs and/or SGLT-2is in the future because of their participation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A quality improvement initiative targeting drivers of TI was associated with increased rates of guideline-based medication prescribing for primary care patients with diabetes and may be applied to other conditions in which TI limits care optimisation or guideline adherence.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Latreille, M. W., Tompkins, B. J., Repp, A. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-22T00:00:22-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003499</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003499</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Overcoming therapeutic inertia in primary care: a multisite quality initiative to increase guideline-based prescribing for patients with diabetes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003499</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003499</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003583?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adherence to a care pathway for inflammatory bowel disease in the southwest region of the Netherlands: results of a mixed-methods implementation study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003583?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>In southwest Netherlands, hospitals collaborate to provide high-quality care for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). To achieve this, a care pathway (CP) was implemented for treating IBD with advanced therapies. This study assessed the adherence to the CP and identified implementation barriers and facilitators.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A mixed-methods study was conducted. Quantitative data collected from health records from December 2020 to March 2023 were used to evaluate adherence, and differences were analysed with generalised mixed models. Surveys and semistructured interviews with healthcare providers (HCPs) were used to identify barriers and facilitators, using the extended normalisation theory.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The study included 299 patients. Documentation of repeated screening for infectious diseases when prior tests exceeded 1 year decreased (p&lt;0.001). Adherence to ordering blood tests as advised increased (p&lt;0.001). For patients experiencing a flare, a small but significant increase was observed in the use of validated questionnaires for scoring disease activity (p=0.004). Adherence improved in registering smoking status (p=0.003), side effects (p&lt;0.001), medication adherence (p&lt;0.001) and ordering advised blood tests as recommended (p&lt;0.001). Weight registration decreased (p=0.002).</p>
<p>From 85 surveys, 42 were completed, with 11 interviews conducted. Facilitators were improving collaboration and the potential to standardise care. Barriers were the complexity of the implementation in health records, the difficulty for providers to change routines and IBD heterogeneity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Adherence to the CP appears to be challenging, due to the difficulty HCPs experience in changing routines. Discrepancies between performed and documented tasks may affect adherence rates. The gradual improvement suggests increased familiarity with the CP may enhance adoption.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration</st>
<p>MEC-2020-075.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Visser, E. H., Allers, S., van Linschoten, R. C. A., Bodelier, A. G. L., Fitzpatrick, C., de Jonge, V., Vermeulen, H., Verweij, E., van der Wiel, S. K., van der Horst, D., van der Woude, C. J., van Noord, D., West, R. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-22T00:00:22-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003583</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003583</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adherence to a care pathway for inflammatory bowel disease in the southwest region of the Netherlands: results of a mixed-methods implementation study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003583</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003583</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003601?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving viral load testing coverage among orphan and vulnerable children in Jinka Town, South Ethiopia: a quality improvement project implemented by the USAID FFHPCT activity team]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003601?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Orphan and vulnerable children (OVC) are at a heightened risk of poor health outcomes, particularly in areas with a high prevalence of HIV/AIDS. Viral load (VL) testing is a vital component of HIV care that enables early detection of treatment failure and improves health outcomes. During the first half of the US Agency for International Development Family Focused HIV Prevention, Care and Treatment activity implementation (October 2023&ndash;March 2024), OVC VL testing coverage in Jinka town was 89%. This shortfall affects the timely diagnosis and treatment adjustments for OVC, posing a challenge in achieving the third 95% HIV target. This quality improvement (QI) project aims to improve VL testing coverage among OVC in Jinka town.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>A multidisciplinary QI team used the fishbone diagram to identify the root causes of low VL testing coverage. The nationally adopted model for improvement was employed using the plan&ndash;do&ndash;study&ndash;act (PDSA) cycles. Baseline data were taken from January to March 2024. The QI project was implemented from 1 April to 30 September 2024, for 6 months. A run chart was used to track the progress of the QI project and enforce evidence-based decision-making.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>The QI team tailored five well-worked interventions tested in three PDSA cycles, including appointment date reminders for OVC caregivers, on-the-job capacity building and targeted supportive supervision for staff, conducting caregiver awareness sessions, weekly VL result tracking and feedback mechanism and enhancing community&ndash;facility linkages.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The run chart demonstrated a 7% increment in OVC VL testing coverage, evidenced by six consecutive data points above the median line, indicating a statistically significant association between the identified QI gap and the implemented interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The QI project effectively improved the OVC VL testing coverage in Jinka town. This collaboration not only improves the VL testing coverage but also provides a comprehensive supportive environment for caregivers and families affected by HIV in the area.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dawud, A., Tesfaw, M., Gebrasilase, T., Asefa, A., Abota, A., Ligaba, F., Million, A., Yosef, Y., Tsegaye, K., Markos, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-22T00:00:22-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003601</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003601</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving viral load testing coverage among orphan and vulnerable children in Jinka Town, South Ethiopia: a quality improvement project implemented by the USAID FFHPCT activity team]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003601</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003601</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003440?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving completion of the red reflex examination at neonatal intensive care unit discharge: a practice improvement initiative and multisite planned experiment]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003440?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Completing the red reflex examination (RRE) of the eyes to screen for ophthalmologic abnormalities is an essential component of the newborn physical examination. An abnormal RRE should prompt consultation with an ophthalmologist to perform a formal ocular examination.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Local problem</st>
<p>Chart review at a level IV neonatal intensive care unit (NICU 1) noted a low rate of documentation that the RRE was completed prior to discharge for eligible patients and suboptimal rates at three other NICUs of varying acuities and operational structures (NICUs 2, 3, 4). This prompted the initiation of a quality improvement initiative to improve RRE completion before discharge.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and interventions</st>
<p>A driver diagram was generated to guide testing and implementation of interventions including ophthalmoscope placement, clinician education and electronic health record (EHR) reminders over eight plan-do-study-act cycles at NICU 1. Using the knowledge gained from NICU 1, two impactful tests of change were utilised to perform a 2<b><sup></sup></b>2 factorial planned experiment (PE) at NICUs 2, 3 and 4.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>This initiative led to sustained improvement in completion of the RRE from baseline 66.8% (13-month period) to 100% (22-month intervention period with special cause noted) at NICU 1 with two abnormal RREs detected. The PE using established factors from NICU 1 at NICUs 2, 3 and 4 demonstrated that the combination of ophthalmoscope placement optimisation plus EHR RRE trigger led to 100% RRE compliance at all sites.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This initiative led to a sustained improvement in RRE completion at NICU 1. PE at three other NICUs of varying types and staffing structures identified a synergistic set of change factors, which may yield the greatest improvement across the spectrum of NICUs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shafer, G., Bhakta, K., Gandhi, B., Patel, D., Casini, G., Williams, D., Godambe, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-20T23:30:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003440</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003440</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving completion of the red reflex examination at neonatal intensive care unit discharge: a practice improvement initiative and multisite planned experiment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003440</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003440</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003492?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reducing door-to-ECG time in the emergency department: a quality improvement report]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003492?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Patients presenting emergently with chest pain often experience delays in obtaining an ECG. Studies have found variability in care for patients with acute coronary syndrome, with many patients facing delays to receiving timely ECGs. Delays in acquisition are associated with increased morbidity and mortality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Local problem</st>
<p>Prior to our intervention, median time to ECG in the emergency department (ED) was 16.7 min, with peak times reaching 20.7 min in January 2024, exceeding American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommending an ECG within 10 min of arrival. Contributing factors included workflow inefficiencies, inadequate staffing and process inconsistency.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A quality improvement initiative was implemented from February 2024 to February 2025 aimed at reducing time to ECG and time to ECG interpretation. Key interventions included nursing education, process standardisation, stamps to standardise documentation, ECG responsibility reallocation (triage ECGs done by nurses, floor ECGs done by techs) and the creation of a designated ECG space in triage.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>There were 3510 eligible ECGs conducted across the 12-month intervention period with 1522 ECGs (43.4%) meeting the &lt;10 min goal. The initiative led to a reduction in time to ECG by 4.68 min (95% CI &ndash;7.74 to &ndash;1.62), a 10.8% reduction in median door-to-ECG time from 1 year prior to the intervention (12.9 min to 11.4 min), and a 32% reduction in median door-to-ECG time (16.7 min to 11.4 min) from 6 months prior to the intervention. There was a 74% reduction in median ECG interpretation time (101 min to 26.5 min) over 12 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Process standardisation, role delegation and education effectively reduced ECG times in the ED. Changes in staff who complete ECGs and standardisation of documentation may aid in improving performance metrics in ED settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Srivatsa, S., Ozen, Z., English, T., Delapaz, R., Murphy, L., Davenport, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-20T23:30:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003492</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003492</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reducing door-to-ECG time in the emergency department: a quality improvement report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003492</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003492</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003325?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quality improvement project to reduce intraventricular haemorrhage in very preterm infants failed due to increased life-sustaining intensive care at low gestational age]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003325?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>In October 2016, a single centre quality improvement programme &lsquo;IBIS&rsquo; (from the German "Intraventrikula&#x0308;re Blutungs-Inzidenz Senken"), an intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) prevention bundle had the Specific Measurable Achievable Reasonable Time-bound (SMART) Aim to reduce IVH incidence from 29.6% to 18.5% within 2 years for very preterm (gestational age (GA) between 23 0/7 and 29 6/7).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Monocentric retrospective cohort study of a failed quality improvement project using prospectively collected data including 1276 live-born very preterm infants between 2010 and 2023. Primary outcome measures were IVH, severe IVH and death or severe IVH. Statistical analysis included propensity score matching.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>IBIS, an ongoing IVH prevention bundle based on a systematic literature search starting in October 2016.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Comparing pre-IBIS patients (2010&ndash;September 2016) to IBIS patients (October 2016&ndash;2023) revealed no reduction in IVH (25.1% vs 25.1%) or severe IVH (9.6% vs 9.1%). Instead, mortality (24.8% vs 13%) and delivery room mortality (9% vs 5%) were almost halved and fewer infants died after primary palliative care (8.5% vs 4.7%) or after redirection from intensive to palliative care (15.1% vs 7.9%). Longitudinal analysis revealed no trends for IVH or severe IVH over the entire period. Limiting the analysis to the IBIS period reveals a significant trend for fewer IVH (p=0.001). Propensity score matching revealed significant reduction for severe IVH (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.99) and death or severe IVH (OR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.3 to 0.59) but not for IVH.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The IBIS SMART Aim to reduce IVH failed. Simultaneously, survival was significantly increased by the increased provision of life-sustaining intensive care at lower GAs, which possibly led to an increased risk for acquiring IVH. Our results highlight the need for a better understanding of the effects of extending perinatal interventional activity to lower GAs on adverse outcome monitoring.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erni, I., Bassler, D., Glauser, D., Wolff, M., Grass, B., Adams, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-17T02:57:10-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003325</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003325</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quality improvement project to reduce intraventricular haemorrhage in very preterm infants failed due to increased life-sustaining intensive care at low gestational age]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003325</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003325</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003495?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Chinese version of Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale (FaCE) and Facial Disability Index (FDI)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003495?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>The Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale (FaCE) and the Facial Disability Index (FDI) are essential tools for assessing the quality of life (QoL) in patients with peripheral facial palsy (PFP). This study aims to translate, adapt and validate the FaCE and FDI scales to ensure cultural relevance and psychometric validity for Chinese patients with PFP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Following the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research guidelines, the FaCE and FDI scales were translated and culturally adapted for Chinese use (including forward and back translation). From January to August 2024, 150 Chinese PFP patients and 50 age/gender-matched healthy controls in Sichuan Province were enrolled to evaluate psychometric properties. Statistical analyses included Cronbach&rsquo;s &alpha; (internal consistency), two-way random-effects intraclass correlation coefficient (test-retest reliability, 2-week follow-up), exploratory factor analysis (EFA, principal component analysis/varimax rotation, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin/Bartlett&rsquo;s test; construct validity), Content Validity Index (CVI), Pearson correlations (convergent/discriminant validity VS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)), Mann-Whitney U test (group differences) and standardised response means (SRM)/Cohen&rsquo;s d (responsiveness).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The Cronbach&rsquo;s &alpha; for the FaCE scale was 0.835, and for the FDI scale, it was 0.895, indicating good internal consistency. Factor analysis revealed six dimensions for the FaCE scale, while the FDI scale was confirmed to have a two-dimensional structure. Additionally, significant correlations were found between the relevant dimensions of the FaCE and FDI scales and the SF-36, supporting their convergent validity. The Mann-Whitney U test indicated significant differences in initial questionnaire responses between the experimental and control groups (p&lt;0.01). Responsiveness analysis demonstrated that the FaCE scale effectively captured changes in patient status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study validates the effectiveness and reliability of the Chinese-version FaCE and FDI in patients with PFP, providing robust evidence for their use as assessment tools for QoL in this population.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, M., Wang, Y., Gu, Z., Guo, J., Cui, W., Zhao, B., Cai, Z., Liu, Q., Jiang, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-17T02:57:10-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003495</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003495</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Chinese version of Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale (FaCE) and Facial Disability Index (FDI)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003495</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003495</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003477?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A systematic review of international performance indicators and metrics relevant to UK general practice]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003477?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>A wide variety of performance indicators/metrics are used to measure the performance of healthcare systems and to promote quality improvement (QI). We sought to identify indicators relevant to QI and organisational development (OD) within primary care/general practices and to evaluate the evidence for their use in QI and OD interventions in UK general practice and primary care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We used a framework based on UK National Health Service primary care documents to structure the review. Separate literature searches were performed in four databases to identify relevant reviews and primary studies. Studies were included if (1) the main focus was a metric or indicator that fell within the review framework or (2) they reported an OD or QI initiative or intervention in UK primary care that used one or more of the previously identified metrics or indicators. We mapped studies in group 1 against our framework domains. We performed a narrative synthesis of studies in group 2, again organised by the overall framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We included 28 studies, 24 (11 reviews and 13 international primary studies) for metrics or indicators and 4 for initiatives or interventions. The number of individual indicators or groups of indicators in group 1 studies ranged from 1 to 773. Three of the four UK QI/OD studies focused on initial access to general practice services; the other dealt with a programme to encourage self-care for long-term conditions. Mapping of the group 1 studies identified potentially relevant indicators across all domains but the process was methodologically challenging.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Although numerous potential indicators exist, they tend to be poorly defined and lack examples of their use in practice. Further work is needed to identify and evaluate candidate indicators.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chambers, D., Mawson, R., Mettle-Nunoo, J., Sutton, A., Booth, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-15T01:49:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003477</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003477</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A systematic review of international performance indicators and metrics relevant to UK general practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003477</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003477</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003615?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Overcoming breath-hold difficulties with GRASP VIBE for contrast-enhanced MRI liver and pancreas to improve image diagnostic quality]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003615?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Contrast-enhanced MRI is essential for the evaluation and characterisation of indeterminate liver and pancreatic lesions. Conventional volumetric 3D T1-weighted sequences, such as the volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE), play a key role in dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging of these organs. However, these sequences typically require a sustained breath-hold of 18&ndash;22 s to achieve optimal image quality. This requirement poses significant challenges for elderly or critically ill patients, often leading to suboptimal images, reduced diagnostic image quality, scan cancellations or conversion to non-contrast studies.</p>
<p>This quality improvement project at a radiology department in a tertiary care hospital spanned 18 months and employed two plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles. At baseline, the existing dynamic VIBE sequence was optimised to the shortest feasible breath-hold duration of 12&ndash;17 s. While this modification improved image quality for patients capable of brief breath-hold, it remained inadequate for those unable to comply with breath-hold instructions. Consequently, the golden-angle radial sparse parallel VIBE (GRASP VIBE) sequence was applied. This technique enabled free-breathing imaging and retrospective reconstruction of multiple contrast-enhanced phases, offering a viable solution for patients with limited or no breath-hold capacity. In the first PDSA cycle, a trial of GRASP VIBE on patients with breath-hold difficulties demonstrated its feasibility and improved diagnostic value, leading to its broader implementation over 6 months. The second PDSA cycle expanded GRASP VIBE usage to all patients with breath-hold limitations, including those requiring liver-specific contrast agents (gadoxetate disodium) that necessitate prolonged imaging times.</p>
<p>The implementation yielded a 42% reduction in suboptimal images, 75% decrease in scan cancellations and 90% drop in omission of contrast media administration. GRASP VIBE improved diagnostic image quality, minimised breathing artefacts and increased departmental efficiency.</p>
<p>This initiative demonstrates GRASP VIBE as an effective solution for breath-hold challenges encountered in MRI liver and pancreas scans.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sim, F. Y., Chang, P. C., Er, A. T., Lam, M., Quek, J., Ng, S. B., Taneja, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-15T01:49:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003615</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003615</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Overcoming breath-hold difficulties with GRASP VIBE for contrast-enhanced MRI liver and pancreas to improve image diagnostic quality]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003615</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003615</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003487?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving medication reconciliation compliance in a tertiary care hospital of a developing country: a quality improvement initiative using the PDSA cycle]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003487?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Medication reconciliation is a critical process for ensuring patient safety by preventing medication errors, especially at hospital admission. Despite its importance, compliance with this process in our internal medicine ward was alarmingly low, with an initial baseline of only 4% compliance in January 2019. This prompted the initiation of a quality improvement (QI) project aimed at improving adherence to the medication reconciliation process.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A team-based approach was implemented, including junior doctors, nurses, pharmacists and the hospital&rsquo;s information technology team. The plan-do-study-act (PDSA) methodology was used to design, test and implement interventions. Key interventions included educational sessions for junior doctors, integration of pharmacy systems for easy access, daily reminders via a WhatsApp group, and reinforcement of the process by senior residents. Data collection was standardised, tracking patient demographics, reconciliation times and team responsibilities. Compliance was monitored over a 4-month intervention period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>At the start of the intervention, medication reconciliation compliance was at 4%. Initial progress was slow, requiring frequent reminders and educational sessions. However, by the end of the first month, compliance had reached 77%, and by the end of the 4-month period, it improved to 96%, surpassing the target of 90%. This improvement was sustained with a compliance rate above 90% for 6 months following the intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The use of the PDSA methodology significantly improved medication reconciliation compliance, achieving a 96% adherence rate. Engaging healthcare staff through education, clear communication and a team-based approach was key to overcoming barriers and ensuring sustainable improvements. This model can be applied to other QI projects aimed at enhancing patient safety and reducing preventable harm.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sabeen Ahmed, A., Aziz, A., Sethi, S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-13T23:38:02-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003487</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003487</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving medication reconciliation compliance in a tertiary care hospital of a developing country: a quality improvement initiative using the PDSA cycle]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003487</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003487</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003344?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving postoperative functional outcomes through timely physiotherapy referrals in acute care surgery patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgeries: a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative at Hazm Mebaireek General Hospital, Qatar]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003344?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Recovery in postoperative patients involves multiple domains including physical, physiological, psychological, social and economic aspects. Immediate postoperative physiotherapy (PT) is crucial for promoting early recovery and reducing hospital stay, particularly after common general surgeries like laparoscopic appendectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hernia repair. Despite its benefits, there is often a gap in the optimal delivery of PT services, as observed at Hazm Mebaireek General Hospital, where only 10.4% of postoperative patients were referred to PT. The project aimed to improve the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) distance from 250 m to 350 m and the incentive spirometry inspiration volume (ISIV) from 927 mL/s to 1200 mL/s in acute care surgery (ACS) postoperative patients over a 12-week period. This was to be achieved by increasing the percentage of immediate postoperative PT referrals from 10% to 50% through multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. The project involved a multidisciplinary team of ACS surgeons, physiotherapists and inpatient nurses. The interventions included educational workshops, daily reminders and personalised reminders to on-call surgeons. Process, outcome and balancing measures were tracked to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions. The percentage of immediate postoperative referrals to PT increased from 10% to 67.7%, surpassing the target. The average 6MWT distance improved from 247.17 m to 390.86 m, and the average ISIV increased from 927 mL/s to 1198 mL/s. There were no reported increases in fall incidents or pain following PT, indicating that the interventions improved care quality without compromising patient safety. The project successfully enhanced postoperative recovery through increased PT referrals, demonstrating the effectiveness of targeted educational interventions and systematic reminders. These findings suggest that simple, targeted interventions can significantly improve postoperative care. Future steps include institutionalising the successful strategies, expanding them to other departments and exploring broader applications to ensure sustainability and scalability.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Musthafa, S., Thomas, J., Thuppathil, K. R., Alaudeen, N., Thomaskoshy, N. K., Khan, M. B., Colak, E., Othman, O. A., Moustafa, O. S., Bouchiba, N., Abdelaziem Mustafa, S., Zarour, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-13T02:20:26-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003344</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003344</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving postoperative functional outcomes through timely physiotherapy referrals in acute care surgery patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgeries: a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative at Hazm Mebaireek General Hospital, Qatar]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003344</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003344</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003553?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving colorectal cancer screening through Cologuard education: a quality improvement initiative in an urban primary care clinic]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003553?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is critical for early detection and prevention. A prior analysis at our urban primary care clinic revealed a CRC screening completion rate of 62% in patients who had visited our clinic in the first half of 2023. Identified barriers for lower-than-national-average CRC screening rate included limited awareness and understanding among both providers and patients regarding CRC screening options and processes, particularly Cologuard. To address these gaps effectively, we implemented a series of targeted interventions aimed at increasing Cologuard utilisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Using an iterative plan-do-study-act model, interventions were implemented from January to September 2024 among average-risk patients aged 45&ndash;75 years who presented to primary care visits. Interventions focused on (1) biweekly, small-group provider education sessions with daily reminders, (2) bilingual patient-facing educational materials, posters and instructional videos and (3) electronic medical record portal outreach. The primary outcome was Cologuard completion rate among CRC-screening eligible patients. Process measures were Cologuard order rates and kit return rates, and the secondary outcome was the overall CRC screening completion rates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 2171 CRC-screening eligible patients visited during the intervention period, and a total of 399 Cologuard orders were placed, with 235 completed kits returned. Cologuard completion rates improved from a preintervention median of 7.38%&ndash;10.00%. Median order rates rose from 14.59% to 18.71%, and overall CRC screening rates increased from 68.6% to 72.2%. Direct patient messaging had the most immediate impact, with 7.2% responses by recipients, resulting in 16 screenings and a transient peak of 20.71% in monthly Cologuard completion.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>This project demonstrates that practical, multifaceted, low-cost strategies of provider-focused education and patient-directed digital outreach can significantly improve Cologuard usage, ultimately leading to an increase in CRC screening completion rates. Sustained reinforcement and improvement in kit return will be a key to future improvements.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koseki Senda, M., Chow, D., Dev, B., DeBroff, J., O Ferrall, C., Fliehman, R., Jiang, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-10T02:23:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003553</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003553</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving colorectal cancer screening through Cologuard education: a quality improvement initiative in an urban primary care clinic]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003553</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003553</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003393?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cost4Visit: a cross-sectional cohort study on hidden costs among surgical patients and relatives for in-person and video visits]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003393?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Healthcare systems face excessive pressure on sustainability due to financial, social and environmental concerns. Video visits offer an appreciated alternative for routine in-person visits in surgical subspecialties, with the potential to lower costs among hospitals and patients and carbon footprint. However, a comprehensive understanding of patients&rsquo; and companions&rsquo; costs to attend an outpatient clinic visit remains understudied. The study aims to provide insight into direct and indirect patient costs of a tertiary surgical outpatient clinic visit.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A cross-sectional survey study was conducted among adult patients scheduled for a tertiary outpatient surgery clinic visit from September 2020 to September 2021. The cost of a surgical visit was assessed using a study-specific questionnaire. Visit costs between subspecialties and visit modalities were compared with generalised linear modelling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 961 included surgical patients (866 in-person and 95 video visits), those who received a video visit experienced a substantial halving of visit-related costs (67 vs 172; &beta;=&ndash;103.65, p&lt;0.001) and reduction in costs with increasing age (&beta;=&ndash;1.52, p=&lt;0.001), attributable to decreased absenteeism from work for patients and companions, and the absence of travel expenses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Direct and indirect costs among patients and relatives for a visit to a tertiary surgical outpatient clinic are high. Reporting previously neglected, yet significant costs, including those borne by companions, could enhance awareness among clinicians and policymakers regarding the financial and societal impact of offering certain visit modalities and may influence the shared decision-making process.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van Dalen, D., Adang, E., van Goor, H., Stommel, M. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-09T03:44:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003393</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003393</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cost4Visit: a cross-sectional cohort study on hidden costs among surgical patients and relatives for in-person and video visits]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003393</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003393</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003396?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identifying and prioritising technical and non-technical skills for simulation-based curriculum in anaesthesiology: a Delphi-based needs assessment]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003396?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To identify and prioritise technical and non-technical procedures that should be integrated into a simulation-based training curriculum in anaesthesiology using the Delphi method.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study design</st>
<p>A needs assessment using a three-round Delphi process was completed among leaders in anaesthesiologists across medical colleges in our country. The responders were mostly alumni of our institution and their colleagues. Delphi round 1 identified technical and non-technical skills after brainstorming sessions with experts in the field. Round 2 involved collecting data through questionnaires about the technical skills best suited for simulation-based training and topics of importance using Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation-Needs Assessment Formula (CAMES NAF) score. Round 3 included final elimination and reprioritisation. The topics were narrowed down by steering research members based on data saturation in the open-ended questions (qualitative), as well as statistical data (CAMES-NAF) for the quantitative questions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In Delphi round 1, we identified 22 technical skills, 10 non-technical skills and 21 scenarios. Response rates in the Delphi round 2 averaged to 85.5% and responses were prioritised using CAMES NAF score. Open-ended questions reached data saturation for non-technical skills and scenarios. In round 3, we were able to narrow it down to 10 technical skills, 5 non-technical skills and 8 scenarios after elimination and reprioritisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We identified and prioritised 8 scenarios, 10 technical skills and 5 non-technical skills in anaesthesiology that are suitable for simulation and may be used as a guide for developing simulation-based curriculum in anaesthesiology.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vincent, D., Mitali, P., Eapen, A., Mahmood, L. S., Mudigere, G. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-09T03:44:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003396</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003396</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identifying and prioritising technical and non-technical skills for simulation-based curriculum in anaesthesiology: a Delphi-based needs assessment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003396</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003396</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003423?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PSAzing up patient care: a quality improvement project for informed cancer screening]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003423?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths among men in the USA. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing for screening remains controversial, with shared decision-making (SDM) recommended by professional guidelines to discuss screening&rsquo;s risks, benefits and uncertainties. Despite these recommendations, SDM is underused, with only 10% of men receiving comprehensive SDM. This quality improvement project aimed to improve SDM documentation and the implementation of PSA screening in an urban safety-net, resident-led primary care clinic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We implemented a continuity clinic note template with a specific SDM &lsquo;dot phrase&rsquo; to improve the documentation and execution of SDM conversations. Our primary aim was to increase SDM documentation for prostate cancer screening, with a secondary aim to improve follow-up on abnormal PSA values. The intervention included men aged 55&ndash;69 years. Preintervention, residents were educated on SDM and PSA screening. Postintervention, patient charts were reviewed for documentation rates and screening outcomes. Feedback was collected during dedicated sessions. Finally, comparative statistics were conducted between baseline preintervention and eligible postintervention cohorts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>SDM documentation improved significantly from 7.1% preintervention to 37.2% postintervention (p&lt;0.001). PSA screening rates increased from 31.5% to 37.8% (p=0.155), though not significantly. Notably, 49.3% of patients declined PSA testing post-SDM, and 68.5% of previously screened patients were up to date with PSA testing. Residents reported challenges with SDM implementation, including time constraints and patient acuity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Templated notes and dot phrases significantly improved SDM documentation, both compared with our clinic baseline rates and compared with recent reported national rates, overall enhancing standardised preventive care in primary care. Although PSA screening rates improved, challenges such as time limitations and patient no-shows impacted the intervention&rsquo;s effectiveness. Future cycles will address these barriers to improve outcomes further.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Godin, S.-L., Ezell, K., Stein, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-09T03:44:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003423</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003423</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PSAzing up patient care: a quality improvement project for informed cancer screening]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003423</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003423</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003468?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Validation of a short patient-reported compassion measure: the Sinclair Compassion Questionnaire-Short Form (SCQ-SF)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003468?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The criticality of compassion in healthcare is recogniszed by governments, healthcare organisations, providers, researchers and most importantly patients. There have been calls for the development and evaluation of tools for the routine measurement of compassion, as compassion has been found to be a critical predictor of quality care. However, there has been a paucity of validated and reliable psychometrics to assess this construct.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>We assessed the reliability, factor structure and validity of the Sinclair Compassion Questionnaire-Short Form (SCQ-SF).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The SCQ-SF was embedded in a large administration survey (N=2236) aimed at assessing Canadians in facility-based continuing care contexts. Reliability analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted on the SCQ-SF data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Data from 2236 residents were analysed. Cronbach&rsquo;s alpha (&alpha; =0.91) indicated that the SCQ-Short had excellent reliability. CFA indicated a well-fitting unidimensional model of compassion. The standardised factor loadings for the 5-items ranged between 0.76 and 0.87. Global indicators of fit were largely excellent (root-mean-squared residuals = 0.06, comparative fit index &lt;0.99, standardised root-mean squared residual = 0.01, 2 =35.66, p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The SCQ-SF is a short psychometric tool, with excellent internal consistency, strong factor loadings and good fit. The SCQ-SF is suitable for use by clinicians, researchers and health system analysts.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boss, H. C., MacInnis, C. C., Simon, R., Jackson, J., Lahtinen, M., Sinclair, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-09T03:44:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003468</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003468</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Validation of a short patient-reported compassion measure: the Sinclair Compassion Questionnaire-Short Form (SCQ-SF)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003468</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003468</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003247?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving staff enjoyment at work in a community mental health team: a quality improvement project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003247?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Staffing has been a significant problem for our community rehabilitation team in the past with high vacancy rates, sickness and turnover, impacting negatively on patient care at times. Our project aim was to improve staff enjoyment at work, in the hope that this might also improve staff retention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>We measured enjoyment levels by distributing an anonymous questionnaire weekly at team meetings, scoring enjoyment levels on a scale 1&ndash;10 and collecting qualitative feedback. We also calculated monthly staffing levels. The team developed a driver diagram and interventions were introduced from this including reflective practice sessions, monthly teaching sessions, staff social events and a cross-cover/duty policy with guidance on flexible working.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>After the interventions were implemented, the median staff enjoyment score increased slightly from 6.75/10 to 7/10 and the median staffing levels increased from 61% to 89% over a period of 18 months. We found that staffing levels and enjoyment levels correlated with each other. From analysis of the qualitative feedback over the duration of the project, the number of negative comments received did reduce. It should be noted that the number of comments around the intensity of workload remained the same when comparing the baseline period to the final weeks of the project.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>There was little change in staff enjoyment levels at work. This may be reflective of the general state of the National Health Service with poor levels of morale nationally but may also be linked to ongoing concerns in the qualitative feedback from the team about high workloads. Despite this, we made positive changes and the project helped bring the team together. The project further emphasises the link between staffing levels and enjoyment levels. Overall, our project helped to increase staffing levels and highlight the importance of well-being in the workplace.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greenslade, E., Gray, I., Perry, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-06T23:37:10-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003247</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003247</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving staff enjoyment at work in a community mental health team: a quality improvement project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003247</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003247</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003319?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Analysing the effect of multidisciplinary teams to address preventive healthcare gaps in a rural teaching clinic: a quality improvement project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003319?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Preventive care decreases the risk of illness, disease and death, yet patient adherence to preventive care is low, calculated to be around 5%, and rural residents are suspected to have even lower rates compared with urban patients. Despite continually updated guidelines and recommendations for screenings and preventive care, delivery of care to rural patients is difficult, and a deficit exists. This project aimed to use multidisciplinary teams at a teaching rural health clinic to close five preventive care gaps: lung cancer screening, colon cancer screening, Shingrix vaccination, osteoporosis screening and hepatitis C screening by 10% in the rural community.</p>
<p>An electronic medical record (EMR) analysis was used to identify and prioritise preventive care gap deficiencies, and quality improvement methods integrating student physicians were used to integrate and optimise care gap closures into the daily routine of clinic staff.</p>
<p>After three intervals of the project period, a 19% increase was achieved in lung cancer screening, a 49% increase in colon cancer screenings and 63% and 9% in osteoporosis and hepatitis C screenings. Additionally, medical providers had a change in practice management as a direct result of intentional attention to preventive care gaps. The Shingrix vaccination project needed to be stopped due to the availability of the vaccine.</p>
<p>By using an EMR and a working relationship between staff, nursing, physicians and students, health disparities in a rural community were decreased.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hill, V., Woody, B., Abid, F. I., Barros, M., Pohani, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-06T23:37:10-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003319</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003319</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analysing the effect of multidisciplinary teams to address preventive healthcare gaps in a rural teaching clinic: a quality improvement project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003319</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003319</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003538?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multidisciplinary Delphi study validated variables for calculating cost of medication errors in the Sri Lankan context]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003538?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The burden of medication errors needs to be costed but no standard method, nor a standard list of variables, has yet been identified. Hence, this study aimed to establish a standard list of cost variables (SLCV) for calculating the cost of medication errors in Sri Lanka from a provider perspective.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The study had three discrete phases: a systematic review to identify cost variables used globally to calculate the cost of medication errors (published), followed by a Delphi study with 18 experts to assess appropriateness, accuracy, accessibility and measurability of identified cost variables. Finally, a hospital bill analysis was done to assess accessibility and measurability of cost variables.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In Delphi round 1, out of 13 cost variables, nine were retained as appropriate for calculating medication error costs. None were rated as accessible or measurable in the healthcare settings in Sri Lanka. Experts highlighted the need for a guideline to use the cost variables, which was then developed and shared among experts in Delphi round 2. The SLCV, including eight variables, was retained as appropriate for calculating medication error cost after Delphi round 2. Thirty-one bills confirmed the accessibility and measurability of most variables in SLCV.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>A standard list comprising eight appropriate cost variables to calculate the cost of medication errors, and a guideline was developed for Sri Lanka. The accessibility of these variables was affirmed through a bill audit.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ranasinghe, S., Navodya, D., Nadeshkumar, A., Senadheera, S., Samaranayake, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-06T23:37:10-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003538</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003538</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multidisciplinary Delphi study validated variables for calculating cost of medication errors in the Sri Lankan context]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003538</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003538</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003432?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Systematic review of patient safety incident reporting practices in maternity care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e003432?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Problem</st>
<p>Patient safety incident reporting in maternity care is central for improving safety, yet inconsistencies in reporting practices and limited understanding of system functionalities may reduce its effectiveness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Reporting incidents allows healthcare providers to identify safety issues and implement improvements. However, variations in reporting practices, particularly in maternity care, have been found across different healthcare settings. Despite the growing use of electronic systems, challenges such as under-reporting, lack of feedback and insufficient organisational learning persist.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>This review explores how patient safety incidents are reported in maternity care, identifies the systems used globally, examines potential barriers and enablers to reporting, and highlights gaps in existing research and practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A systematic review was conducted, analysing studies that focused on incident reporting practices in maternity care. An artificial intelligence text analysis tool (Caplena) was used to aid the synthesis of the study data. Methodologies included quantitative surveys, qualitative interviews and mixed methods approaches.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>A total of 15 studies from seven different countries were analysed. Reporting systems ranged from traditional paper-based methods to electronic platforms. Barriers included organisational culture, time pressures and inadequate reporting platforms. Enablers involved supportive leadership, training and user-friendly reporting systems. Substantial gaps included the under-reporting of near misses, lack of feedback mechanisms and insufficient attention to staff experiences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The findings highlight the need for consistent, user-friendly reporting systems and fostering a supportive, non-punitive culture. Strengthening and improving feedback mechanisms is also critical to enhance reporting practices. Recommendations are provided for designing future reporting systems.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Improving patient safety incident reporting in maternity care requires system improvements, cultural changes and further research to address identified gaps and optimise incident management systems.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beecham, E., Brady, G., Iqbal, S., Fatima, Q., Arshad, S., Bondaronek, P., OCarroll, J., Glaser, S., Siassakos, D., Gilchrist, K., Dorey, J., Knagg, R., Vindrola, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-05T22:07:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003432</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003432</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Systematic review of patient safety incident reporting practices in maternity care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003432</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003432</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e002774?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Altering physician referral practices is challenging, but not impossible: spine assessment clinic quality improvement study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/4/e002774?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Access to medical specialists is a persistent challenge, with neurosurgical spine services reporting some of the longest waits across all fields. Inappropriate and incomplete referrals contribute to delayed access to these providers. Referral guidelines and physician education have been shown to decrease such inefficiencies. Therefore, the goal of this study was to address inappropriate referrals directed to the neurosurgical spine assessment clinic via implementation of a quality improvement initiative. We hypothesised that appropriate referrals, which included patients with potential surgical pathology and fulfilled referral criteria, would increase by 25% following referral guideline distribution.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A three-phase study was implemented: (1) baseline data were collected from preintervention referrals by noting the reason for consultation and if certain information, deemed relevant for an appropriate referral, was included; (2) a referral guideline, outlining when and how to refer, was distributed to family physicians in the region; and (3) postintervention referrals were collected and analysed as in phase I.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 404 referrals were collected (161 pre-intervention and 243 post-intervention). A 36% increase in patients who were deemed appropriate surgical candidates was reported post-intervention (p=0.044), with an escalation in the proportion of patients requiring neurosurgeon assessment observed over time. Limited improvements were appreciated in the presence of the criteria indicated for inclusion in a referral document.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>While challenges remain when attempting to modify the referring behaviours of primary care physicians, this research has demonstrated that guidelines aimed at enhancing specialist directed referrals can lead to improvements in their performance. Nonetheless, translating guidelines into practice is a recognised issue, often requiring time and multiple exposures. Active forms of medical education and multifaceted interventions have been demonstrated to be the most effective means of implementing guidelines into practice, an approach that could further address referral inadequacies in the future.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Varga, A., Slomp, F., Ritchie, V., Slater-Maclean, L., Thiessen, E., Hockley, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-02T22:24:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002774</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-002774</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Altering physician referral practices is challenging, but not impossible: spine assessment clinic quality improvement study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e002774</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e002774</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003420?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Use of WHO quality assessment/quality improvement tool for maternal and newborn care for gap analysis and POCQI methodology to improve preterm neonatal outcomes at a tertiary care centre: a quality improvement initiative]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003420?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Preterm birth is a leading cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity globally. Evidence suggests that over three-quarters of premature deaths can be prevented through cost-effective interventions. However, compliance with evidence-based guidelines in neonatal care often falls &lt;50%, even in well-resourced settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims and objectives</st>
<p>The study evaluated system gaps using WHO Quality Assessment/Quality Improvement Tool for Maternal and Newborn Care (WHO QA/QI MN) and implemented Point of Care Quality Improvement (POCQI) methodology to improve and sustain the composite outcome of mortality and/or major morbidities, including bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotising enterocolitis stage 3, late-onset sepsis and intraventricular haemorrhage grade &ge;3.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Materials and methods</st>
<p>The study was conducted over 14 months. The adapted WHO QA/QI MN tool and POCQI methodology were used to focus on key clinical practices, namely, kangaroo mother care (KMC), use of mother&rsquo;s own milk (MoM) and antibiotic usage, utilising multiple plan-do-study-act cycles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 961 preterm neonates enrolled, KMC rates increased from 70.25% to 85.58%, and exclusive MoM use by day 7 increased from 59.24% to 70.2%. Antibiotic use declined from 25.5% to 20.67%. While process improvements were noted, the composite outcome of mortality and major morbidities did not show statistically significant reduction; however, a decreasing trend was observed post-intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study demonstrates the feasibility of using the WHO tool by trained personnel for gap analysis. POCQI is an important approach to enhance evidence-based care practices and sustain good outcomes for preterm neonates in resource-limited settings. A longer follow-up may be needed to observe significant improvements in clinical outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suthar, K., Nangia, S., Anand, P., Pemde, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-29T21:36:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003420</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003420</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Use of WHO quality assessment/quality improvement tool for maternal and newborn care for gap analysis and POCQI methodology to improve preterm neonatal outcomes at a tertiary care centre: a quality improvement initiative]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003420</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003420</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003431?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Can benchmarking uncover the disparities in the perinatal dashboard and improve the quality of care that pregnant women of diverse ethnic backgrounds receive? A retrospective cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003431?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study evaluates the impact of including ethnicity and English proficiency (EP) in the local perinatal dashboard to uncover outcome differences faced by pregnant women from diverse ethnic backgrounds.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at the University Hospitals of Leicester between September 2020 and December 2020, including 2862 singleton pregnancies at booking and 2407 deliveries. Data from the maternity server covered demographics and key performance indicators (KPIs), such as gestational age at booking, uptake of first trimester screening test (FTST), perinatal outcome, third- and fourth-degree perineal tears and post-partum haemorrhage (PPH). The NHS perinatal surveillance dashboard categorised these KPIs by ethnicity and EP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The booking cohort comprised 62% White, 26% Asian, 3% Black, 2% mixed race and 2.5% any other ethnic group. Late antenatal booking was highest in the mixed-race cohort (15%). Women who do not speak English as their first language (NEPL) were the largest undecided group with the FTST uptake (10%). Among the delivery group, mixed-race women had a higher stillbirth rate (21.28 per 1000 live births) and preterm births (10%). Third- and fourth-degree tear rates were highest among ethnic minority-NEPL cohorts (4.36%), although they were not statistically significant. No significant differences were observed in PPH rates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study highlights perinatal disparities among diverse ethnic groups and non-English-speaking women, necessitating targeted interventions to address these inequities for better perinatal outcomes for diverse populations. Including ethnicity and EP in perinatal dashboards reveals these disparities and aids in developing quality assurance systems to monitor and address them.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sudhakar, V., Siddiqui, F., Lim, J. N., Pillay, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-29T21:36:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003431</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003431</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Can benchmarking uncover the disparities in the perinatal dashboard and improve the quality of care that pregnant women of diverse ethnic backgrounds receive? A retrospective cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003431</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003431</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003484?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reducing surgical site infections in patients undergoing pancreatic resection: a quality improvement initiative]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003484?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent a significant source of morbidity during pancreaticoduodenectomy. The use of piperacillin&ndash;tazobactam (pip&ndash;tazo) has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of SSI in this patient population. We thus elected to perform a quality improvement (QI) project to reduce superficial and deep SSI rates by ensuring all patients received pip&ndash;tazo as antibiotic prophylaxis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We collected baseline retrospective data on a historical cohort of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy from 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2022. We then launched our QI project on 1 January 2023, consisting of a multidisciplinary team creation and numerous outreach activities. The project had two Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycles and ran until April 2024. The Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence guidelines were used to report results.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Baseline cohort data included 64 patients, with 32% receiving pip&ndash;tazo and 39% developing an SSI. During phase one of our QI project (1 January 2023&ndash;31 August 2023), 54 patients underwent surgery, 90.7% received pip&ndash;tazo and 27.8% developed an SSI. Those who had undergone preoperative biliary stenting had a higher SSI rate (46.9% vs 4.4%). We thus added a second SSI reduction measure to patients with biliary stents: the ringed wound protector. During the second phase of our QI project (1 September 2023&ndash;1 April 2024), 51 patients underwent surgery, 98.0% received pip&ndash;tazo and 65.0% had a wound protector placed. SSI rates in this group were 9.8%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>We describe a QI project whereby we increased the rates of correct antibiotic dosing in patients undergoing pancreatectomy to 98.0%. Although pip&ndash;tazo reduced SSI rates, the addition of a ringed wound protector in patients at high risk further reduced rates of SSI. We thus suggest the use of pip&ndash;tazo and ringed wound protectors as an effective strategy to reduce SSI rates in patients undergoing pancreatectomy.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gilbert, R. W., Kwon, M., Khalid, M. U., Bleszynski, M., Chung, S. W., Oldani, G., Segedi, M., Webb, M., Leung, P., Mah, A., OBrien, M., Kidson, K. M., Chartier-Plante, S., Kim, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-29T02:57:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003484</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003484</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reducing surgical site infections in patients undergoing pancreatic resection: a quality improvement initiative]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003484</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003484</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003253?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Management and governance of medication prescribing alerts among hospitals in Japan: a nationwide survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003253?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Effective medication prescribing alerts are crucial for ensuring medication safety. However, the frequent occurrence of low-specificity alerts contributes to alert fatigue, where repeated non-critical alerts diminish clinicians&rsquo; responsiveness to all alerts. Striking a balance between reducing alert fatigue and ensuring the effective functioning of critical alerts remains a key challenge in medication safety. Nevertheless, no nationwide surveys or reports from government bodies or academic societies have addressed alert management. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the current landscape of alert management systems, clarify existing challenges in managing medication prescribing alerts and support the development of policies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a nationwide survey to examine how medication prescribing alert systems are managed in Japanese hospitals. Hospitals recognised for maintaining high standards in patient safety were selected to provide insights into current alert management practices. Survey invitation letters were sent to the healthcare information systems departments of the eligible hospitals. Participants were asked to complete the survey through a web-based form (Google Forms) or by mail. Data collection took place between December 2021 and January 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Questionnaires were sent to 1055 hospitals, with responses received from 259 (response rate of 24.5%). A total of 110 (42.6%) hospitals reported being unaware of all types of medication prescribing alerts. Many hospitals reported an inability to measure alert data. Only 42 (16.3%) hospitals had established policies and procedures for adding new alerts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Only a few hospitals have a system for the quantitative evaluation and comprehensive control of medication prescribing alerts. Each hospital should implement a policy and procedure for alert management and develop an alert data measuring system.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nakayama, N., Takizawa, M., Ohishi, Y., Komatsu, Y., Tanaka, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-26T00:28:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003253</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003253</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Management and governance of medication prescribing alerts among hospitals in Japan: a nationwide survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003253</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003253</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003323?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving the compliance of orthopaedic wrist and hand referrals against the musculoskeletal recommendations from the 2018 Evidence-based Interventions programme, along with local guidance in Greater Manchester: A quality improvement project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003323?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The National Health Service Long-Term Workforce Plan calls for improving clinical pathways for surgery. Four wrist and hand surgeries, including carpal tunnel syndrome release, Dupuytren&rsquo;s contracture release, ganglion excision and trigger finger release, are described as procedures of limited clinical value and are included in the 2018 Evidence-based Interventions programme, as well as local guidance in Greater Manchester (GM).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Local problem</st>
<p>A pre-scoping exercise audit at a single musculoskeletal service in GM conducted from May 2021 to June 2023 highlighted that clinician compliance rates for these referrals were 15% below the service provider&rsquo;s internal national average and 25% below the service provider&rsquo;s internal national target, demonstrating the need for a quality improvement project.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The Model for Improvement was implemented using four Plan&ndash;Do&ndash;Study&ndash;Act (PDSA) cycles. These cycles were executed over 14 weeks and aimed to improve compliance through educational sessions, clinical resources, interactive learning and practical tools.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>The project comprised four PDSA cycles: PDSA 1 introduced educational sessions and case discussions, PDSA 2 implemented a clinical flowchart to guide decision-making, PDSA 3 included a knowledge retention quiz and PDSA 4 involved a repeat quiz and further discussions to consolidate learning. The target was to increase compliance rates from 70% to 85% or more.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The project successfully improved compliance rates by 30%, with the final compliance rate reaching 100%, surpassing the service provider&rsquo;s internal national average and target, respectively. 100% compliance was achieved and sustained during PDSA 4 until the end of the project. Clinician confidence and quiz scores also increased during the intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Educational initiatives, combined with practical tools like clinical flowcharts and quizzes, significantly improved compliance rates. The project provides a scalable model that can be adapted by other community healthcare services to enhance compliance with orthopaedic referrals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Woodhead, D. L., Goodwin, P. C., Miller, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-26T00:28:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003323</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003323</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving the compliance of orthopaedic wrist and hand referrals against the musculoskeletal recommendations from the 2018 Evidence-based Interventions programme, along with local guidance in Greater Manchester: A quality improvement project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003323</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003323</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003543?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving the person-centredness of occupational therapy input into care planning in acute adult and older adults inpatient services using Goal-Directed Care Plan guidelines]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003543?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Person-centred care planning is essential in mental health inpatient services, ensuring that patient goals align with clinical recovery plans. Despite its recognised importance, occupational therapists (OTs) in acute inpatient settings often face challenges in implementing structured, person-centred care plans within 10 days of admission based on the OT process within the acute inpatient services. The Goal-Directed Care Planning (GDCP) framework, previously successful in forensic and rehabilitation settings, was introduced to improve OT input into care plans in acute inpatient services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aimed to enhance the person-centredness of occupational therapy care plans by implementing the GDCP framework, with a target of improving OT contributions from 27.44% to 70% by October 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A quality improvement approach using multiple plan-do-study-act cycles was employed to embed the GDCP framework into three inpatient wards. Key interventions included standardising OT care-plan input, providing in-house training on care-plan audits, and ensuring timely documentation of patient goals and interventions. Monthly audits were conducted to assess progress and identify areas for further improvement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Across the board, OT input into care plans significantly improved from 27.44% (June&ndash;October 2023) to 53.25% (November 2023&ndash;October 2024). Ward-specific improvements were observed, with Ward T increasing from 24.42% to 43.32%, Ward M from 37% to 67.03% and Ward P from 21.09% to 44.34%. Key areas of improvement included clearer goal-action links and increased involvement of patients in care planning.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Implementing the GDCP framework enhanced the quality and consistency of OT contributions to care plans, fostering a more structured and outcome-driven approach. However, ongoing challenges such as workforce shortages and OTs being allocated to non-specialist roles in safer staffing need to be addressed to sustain improvements in person-centred care planning.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ige, J. J., Screaton, E., Jepson, E., Morgan, D., Bifarin, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-26T00:28:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003543</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003543</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving the person-centredness of occupational therapy input into care planning in acute adult and older adults inpatient services using Goal-Directed Care Plan guidelines]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003543</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003543</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002941?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving adherence to CDC public health guidance for screening newly arrived refugee children through clinical decision support implementation: a primary care-based quality improvement study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002941?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Many refugee children arrive in the USA from regions with higher risks of health conditions such as elevated blood lead or latent tuberculosis, making comprehensive health screening on arrival crucial for child health. Despite Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) screening guidance, clinical implementation challenges persist. To address this, we developed a clinical decision support (CDS) toolkit to support screening within the Children&rsquo;s Hospital of Philadelphia&rsquo;s refugee health programme. This quality improvement project evaluated the CDS toolkit&rsquo;s effectiveness in improving clinician adherence to screening guidance for newly arrived refugee children across two Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We retrospectively evaluated health screening for refugee children aged 6 months to 21 years seen in a primary care-based refugee child health programme from 1 January 2011 to 30 September 2023. We assessed completion of recommended screenings for elevated blood lead level (EBLL), tuberculosis, hepatitis B, anaemia, HIV and eosinophilia. The CDS toolkit was updated during the second PDSA cycle to streamline order sets and align with updated CDC guidance. Screening rates were compared across three periods: baseline, first PDSA cycle and second PDSA cycle.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 830 refugee children, initial screening completion remained high at 90.12%. Follow-up lead testing improved from 21.46% at baseline to 36.92% in the second PDSA cycle, though 43.08% of eligible children still missed timely follow-up. EBLL prevalence at arrival increased from 7.43% to 15.69%, reflecting changes in screening thresholds and demographics. These findings demonstrate the CDS toolkit&rsquo;s effectiveness in maintaining high initial screening rates while highlighting persistent challenges in follow-up care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The updated CDS toolkit maintained high completion rates for initial screening, and after two PDSA cycles, it correlated with improvements in follow-up testing for EBLL. This project underscores the need for further interventions to improve follow-up care and supports the potential of CDS toolkits to enhance refugee health screening.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phyu, R., Yun, K., Fabio, M. B., Siddharth, M. B., Ayazi, M. N., Khan, M. I. M. W., Michel, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-25T01:00:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002941</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-002941</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving adherence to CDC public health guidance for screening newly arrived refugee children through clinical decision support implementation: a primary care-based quality improvement study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e002941</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e002941</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003443?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Using I-PASS to improve nursing handoffs across the continuum of care at a tertiary oncology hospital]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003443?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Communication failures can cause medical errors that harm patients. Handoffs occur frequently every day&mdash;every time a patient is transferred from one nurse to another (eg, shift change, hospital location). At our comprehensive cancer centre, handoffs became a priority focus area in our institution.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>We implemented the evidence-based handoff tool I-PASS (Illness Severity, Patient Summary, Action List, Situation Awareness and Contingency Planning, and Synthesis by Receiver) for all nurses at our comprehensive cancer centre and assessed the uptake of the new framework and subsequent compliance and safety outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Our team comprised representatives from nursing education, operations and informatics; a healthcare systems engineer; and electronic health record (EHR) analysts. Based on our observations of handoffs in different settings and feedback from focus group sessions, we developed an I-PASS handoff workflow in our EHR with the engagement of frontline staff and unit leaders. Various education modalities were implemented, and compliance was monitored through an EHR dashboard. Handoff audits were conducted for over a year after I-PASS was implemented to observe compliance with I-PASS reports for verbal handoffs. The institution&rsquo;s regularly administered safety culture survey results were assessed in the category of handoffs and information exchange.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Our process measures, all nurses were trained to use I-PASS by 28 November 2022. Compliance in documenting I-PASS handoffs varied between 86% and 88% of all handoffs between December 2022 and April 2024. I-PASS elements were present in above 95% of verbal handoffs between April 2023 and April 2024. The percentage of clinical nurses who reported favourable handoffs in our institutional safety culture survey improved from 64% in 2022 to 72% in 2024. For our outcome measure, a rate of zero high-harm events was maintained during the same period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The dissemination method led to the full implementation of I-PASS across all nursing areas and improved handoff quality.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ait Aiss, M., Vesho, D., Bowe, C., Franco Vega, M. C., Chau, S., Beno, J., George, M., Porter, C., Bodurka, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-23T20:55:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003443</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003443</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Using I-PASS to improve nursing handoffs across the continuum of care at a tertiary oncology hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003443</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003443</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002620?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On the same (evaluation) page: a novel approach to enhance mixed-methods implementation evaluation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002620?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Quality improvement and implementation science evaluations are often complex mixed methods approaches conducted by interdisciplinary teams. These efforts are challenging in normal circumstances; the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent shift to remote work have posed additional challenges to this type of work. Novel approaches, tools, and processes may be needed to improve the rigor and cohesion of mixed methods evaluations, especially with a team working remotely.</p>
<p>Quality improvement and implementation science evaluations are often complex mixed methods approaches conducted by interdisciplinary teams. These efforts are challenging in normal circumstances; the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent shift to remote work have posed additional challenges to this type of work. Novel approaches, tools, and processes may be needed to improve the rigor and cohesion of mixed methods evaluations, especially with a team working remotely.</p>
<p>Our aim was to create a rigorous evaluation plan for a large hybrid type III implementation-evaluation trial implementing new evidence-based processes at nine medical centers. Given the trial&rsquo;s complexity and a geographically-distributed remotely-working interdisciplinary team, we found that existing tools did not meet our needs. We thus created a novel process for developing a rigorous evaluation plan that others could replicate.</p>
<p>This process has seven steps: 1) select a template and identify point person; 2) complete initial development; 3) obtain targeted asynchronous feedback; 4) identify and analyze gaps; 5) conduct targeted virtual synchronous discussion; 6) finalize working document; and 7) apply the plan and solicit ongoing feedback.</p>
<p>Interdisciplinary quality improvement and implementation science project teams need tools and processes to ensure clear communication, well-ordered workflow, and rigorous operationalization of evaluation aims. The seven-step evaluation plan tool not only helped to enhance the rigor and execution of a large program evaluation, but the process also served an important convening function to enhance coordination between remote team members. Our work builds on existing processes for evaluation plan development while incorporating team science approaches.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ashcraft, L. E., Peeples, A. D., Hall, D., Bowen, M. E., Brown, R. T., Long, J. A., Piazza, K. M., Goodman, O. K., Warren, C. M., Pelcher, L. R., Werner, R. M., Burke, R. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-22T20:28:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002620</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2023-002620</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On the same (evaluation) page: a novel approach to enhance mixed-methods implementation evaluation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research [amp   ] reporting methodology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e002620</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e002620</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003382?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multidisciplinary initiative to reduce 30-day readmissions in heart failure: a quality improvement perspective]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003382?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>Hospitalisation for heart failure (HF) carries a high risk of readmission and adverse patient outcomes. We noticed a higher rate of readmissions for HF patients in a tertiary cardiac centre in Doha, Qatar. This study is focused on using a multidisciplinary and quality improvement approach to reduce the HF patients&rsquo; 30-day readmission rate to the high dependency unit C in Heart Hospital, Doha, Qatar, by 10% by December 2020 and 20% by December 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In collaboration with the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, we worked on this initiative as a multidisciplinary team and tested several changes. A model for improvement framework was used and rapid, weekly, plan-do-study-act cycles were applied to test changes. Multiple measures were implemented serially, which included follow-up telephone consultations by a HF clinical nurse specialist 1 week after hospital discharge, early follow-up in a dedicated HF clinic (within 2 weeks of discharge), the availability of medical guidance over the telephone, comprehensive health coaching and education, patient functional activity engagement and cardiac depression screenings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The readmission rate reduced from 25.5% in 2019 to 5.6% in 2021 (p&lt;0.001). The results achieved have been sustained over time, with readmission rates recorded at 7.87% to date. The study demonstrated a decrease in 30-day readmission rates for HF patients after implementing a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Reducing readmission rates underscores the importance of comprehensive patient education, tailored care plans, consistent follow-up and integrated team-based care in managing HF patients. The success of this initiative highlights the potential of multidisciplinary strategies in improving patient outcomes in chronic conditions like HF.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Varghese, S. K., Francis, T., Shah, J. Z., Gupta, P., Velusamy, E., Varghese, B. S., Selvaraj, S. P., Renyn, L. K., Savarimuthu, I., Mahinay, M., Al-Amri, M. K., Azeem Arnoos, A. A., Thangaraj, P., Natarajan, S., Hamed Badr, A. M., Patel, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-22T20:28:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003382</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003382</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multidisciplinary initiative to reduce 30-day readmissions in heart failure: a quality improvement perspective]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003382</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003382</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003473?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing and evaluating a proof-of-concept patient safety training programme for health workers in North Macedonia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003473?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Patient safety is a global health priority, yet formal training in patient safety principles for healthcare workers remains limited in many countries, particularly in low-resource or transitional health systems. Similar to other countries in South-Eastern Europe, North Macedonia faces patient safety challenges&mdash;including a prevailing blame culture and gaps in standard safety practices. We designed, delivered and evaluated a context-tailored patient safety training programme for healthcare workers in North Macedonia and assessed its impact on participants&rsquo; immediate knowledge gains of key patient safety topics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A 4-day interactive training workshop was developed following a situational analysis of national safety gaps. Day 1 included awareness-raising sessions for institutional managers. Eighty-five healthcare workers, physicians, nurses and midwives, participated in a 3-day workshop that followed. The curriculum covered priority patient safety domains, such as incident reporting, infection prevention, medication safety and surgical and obstetric safety, delivered through lectures and case-based group exercises. Immediate knowledge gains were measured using a 20-item multiple-choice test administered pretraining and post-training. Pre-training and post-training scores were analysed and compared.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Baseline knowledge was suboptimal with a mean pretest score of 37% of correct answers. Immediately after the training, overall knowledge improved markedly. The mean post-test score reached 72%, a gain of 35 percentage points. All topic areas showed significant knowledge gains. Large improvements were observed in domains with the lowest baseline scores&mdash;mean correct responses in surgical safety domain increased from 19% to 76%, in obstetric safety from 18% to 67% and in infection control domain from 31% to 87%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This proof-of-concept quality improvement research initiative suggests that focused educational interventions could help address patient safety knowledge gaps. Sustaining and expanding such training, by integrating it into routine workforce development and licensing, may help strengthen patient safety culture and practices in similar settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zisovska, E., Fonseca, V. R., Spasenovska, M., Velickovski, R., Ivankovic, D., Breda, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-22T20:28:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003473</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003473</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing and evaluating a proof-of-concept patient safety training programme for health workers in North Macedonia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003473</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003473</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003359?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Safe and effective genomic medicine implementation in hospitals: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003359?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Genomic medicine is rapidly changing routine clinical care in a range of specialties. Effective clinical governance is essential for safe implementation of emerging clinical practice, including genomic medicine. Frameworks exist for national implementation of genomics but lack the granularity needed by hospitals to guide local implementation of national policy.</p>
<p>We aimed to identify if a framework suitable to support the safe, effective implementation and use of genomic medicine at a hospital level exists.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A systematic search using scoping review methodology was performed, searching three databases (Medline, Embase and PubMed), from 2009 to 2022, to identify structured approaches to the clinical governance of genomics at a meso (hospital/hospital consortia) level.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>No frameworks were identified that provided a holistic clinical governance approach to hospital-level implementation of genomics. Eight publications included components relevant to the implementation of genomics. While the clinical governance components included in the eight publications varied, all identified one or more of the following as important to effective implementation: optimal leadership of genomic care; ensuring an effective workforce; ensuring safe, effective clinical practice; the importance of quality metrics and the criticality of consumer partnerships. No publication explicitly discussed risk management, but all identified processes which would serve to minimise risk.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Institutional-level change is essential for the implementation of genomic medicine throughout a health system. Yet, there is a lack of evidence-based frameworks to support integrated clinical governance of genomic medicine and its implementation by hospitals and their executive leaders. Our results can contribute to the design of an approach which supports hospital planning and decision-making by integrating all elements of clinical governance. Without this, implementation will be piecemeal, access to genomic medicine across a health system inequitable, and patients may receive inefficient, ineffective, slow and potentially unsafe care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clucas, L., Kelly, C., Do, T. T., Beadell, I., Dawson-McClaren, B., Gaff, C. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-21T20:27:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003359</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003359</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Safe and effective genomic medicine implementation in hospitals: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003359</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003359</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003450?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving the detection and documentation of suspected cauda equina syndrome: a quality improvement project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003450?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare but critical neurological emergency. Prompt diagnosis and accurate documentation are essential to avoid permanent neurological impairment. This quality improvement project aimed to improve the accuracy and completeness of neurological examination documentation for patients presenting with suspected CES.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Using three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles, a digitally prompted documentation tool &lsquo;#CES&rsquo; was developed and implemented in the electronic patient record system. The tool was designed in alignment with the 2019 GIRFT Spine Report and 2023 GIRFT National CES Pathway. It included red flag symptoms and neurological assessment criteria from the ASIA classification. A teaching session on its use was delivered in January before the second data collection period (19 September 2024&ndash;20 October 2024), and it was later incorporated into resident doctor induction in December before the third data collection period (5 January 2025&ndash;5 February 2025).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In the initial cycle (May&ndash;August 2024), documentation was inconsistent, particularly for sensory (0%) and reflex (4.9%) examination. Following implementation and a teaching session (September 2024), documentation improved in the second cycle (September&ndash;October 2024): sensation (81.3%), reflexes (57.1%), though tone and motor documentation declined. In the third cycle (January&ndash;February 2025), full template use rose to 80% (from 25%) and documentation further improved: sensation (94.1%), motor (64.7%), reflexes (64.7%), tone (64.7%), vascular (58.8%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A CES-specific, digitally prompted template significantly improved documentation quality. Integration of GIRFT red flags, clinician codesign and repeated education enhanced uptake and accuracy. Further PDSA cycles will focus on sustainability, time-to-diagnosis metrics and addressing clinician workload concerns.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elhariry, M., Khaleeq, T., Prem, R., Theivendran, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-18T21:12:53-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003450</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003450</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving the detection and documentation of suspected cauda equina syndrome: a quality improvement project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003450</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003450</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003144?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Decreasing blood culture contamination rates in a rural emergency department: a quality improvement initiative]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003144?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Blood culture contamination rates have been consistently above the national benchmark of 3% in the emergency department (ED) at Mosaic Life Care in St. Joseph, Missouri, USA. Contaminations contribute to negative patient outcomes including unnecessary antibiotic exposure, antibiotic resistance, prolonged hospital stays and delayed treatment plans. Reducing contamination rates is imperative to improving outcomes for both patients and the hospital. This study aimed to decrease blood culture contamination rates at a single, rural hospital institution in 7 months. Quality improvement frameworks guided the construction and implementation of the various countermeasures. Analysis of contamination data was conducted monthly and visualised in a run chart. Contamination rates decreased from 4.42%&ndash;3.51% (p&lt;0.002) between September 2023 and October 2023 with Countermeasure 1. Rates fell to 2.9% in January 2024 through implementation of Countermeasure 2. Rates rose briefly to 3.5% in March 2024 but decreased to 2.8% in May 2024 following implementation of Countermeasure 3. Blood culture contamination rates in the ED declined significantly by increasing caregiver awareness via strategic environmental signage and renovating orientation education. The sustainability of this progress requires continued efforts. Maintenance of contamination rates below the national benchmark is targeted with continuous collaboration between clinical partners. This initiative demonstrated the importance of interdepartmental collaboration and communication with all stakeholders involved in quality improvement measures.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patel, P., Johnson, M., Ayers, A., Ayres, M., Andersen, M., Spears, K., Folk, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-16T20:59:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003144</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003144</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Decreasing blood culture contamination rates in a rural emergency department: a quality improvement initiative]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003144</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003144</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003421?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of a tailored implementation strategy for audit-generated improvements in perinatal care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003421?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Perinatal audit identifies substandard factors in perinatal care for quality improvement of care. However, not all identified improvement objectives achieve effective implementation. The ACTion method, using a 7-step Plan&ndash;Do&ndash;Check&ndash;Act cycle, was developed for local perinatal care professionals to enhance tailored implementation by interactive learning, training and coaching of implementation and behaviour change principles.</p>
<p>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the ACTion method within all perinatal cooperation groups (PCGs) in the northern region of the Netherlands.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A mixed-methods design was used for effect and process evaluation. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were applied to analyse participants&rsquo; knowledge; skills; motivation; and the number, nature and implementation stage of improvement objectives. Additionally, influencing factors were examined through inductive thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A multidisciplinary ACTion team was formed in all 11 PCGs. From the initially 93 participating ACTion team members, 86% completed the full training.</p>
<p>Knowledge and skills after implementation of the ACTion method improved significantly, with mean scores increasing from 2.53 to 3.70 on a 1&ndash;5 Likert scale (p&lt;0.001, r=0.9). ACTion teams addressed 3&ndash;19 improvement objectives, with implementation ranging from 14% to 67%, depending on time of start of the project and influencing factors. In total, 98 improvement objectives were addressed, of which 46 (47%) were fully implemented and secured. As emerged from interviews, a proactive key person and ongoing coaching during the follow-up phase were instrumental in driving these efforts. The multidisciplinary approach and collaborative efforts in regional obstetric care enhanced mutual understanding and cooperation across disciplines. Impeding factors included limited time, manpower and lack of commitment within the PCG.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>A locally tailored approach, involving interactive learning, training and coaching in the ACTion method, provides a valuable framework for implementing audit-driven improvement objectives in maternal and perinatal care, while simultaneously fostering interprofessional cooperation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van der Woerdt-Eltink, I., Drost, A., Welker, G., Rosman, A., Erwich, J. J., Miranda, E. d.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-16T20:59:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003421</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003421</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of a tailored implementation strategy for audit-generated improvements in perinatal care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003421</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003421</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003429?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Enhancing senior physician-led multidisciplinary team rounds to improve patient care at Wallaga University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, 2025]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003429?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The healthcare system is facing challenges due to insufficient multidisciplinary collaboration, leading to gaps in treatment, compromised patient safety and increased medical errors. Poor communication can cause misunderstandings, delays in critical decisions and cost escalation. Implementing multidisciplinary team (MDT) rounds, led by a senior physician, can improve communication, streamline decision-making and improve patient care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A multidimensional interventional study was conducted to address the identified problem. A fishbone diagram was used to identify the root causes of the problem. A driver diagram was developed to outline the key drivers and change concepts necessary for achieving the desired outcomes. Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were implemented to test and refine interventions systematically.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>A daily dashboard-based performance audit was implemented, which includes the status of MDT rounds recorded by unit heads and analysed by the Hospital SBFR Taskforce team. Both morning and evening round statuses from various service units are collected for review of the data and communication with department heads prior to morning sessions. The report is shared in a common Telegram group for accessibility among hospital leaders. Each service unit engages in discussions with their MDT every Friday, while a weekly SBFR forum takes place every Tuesday, attended by directors and representatives from service units to review weekly performance. On-site MDT supportive supervision is conducted as needed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Senior physician engagement has significantly improved overall, as evidenced by the average score rising from 49% to 81%. Furthermore, 94% of participants agreed that senior-led MDT rounds were good for teamwork, professional development and discussion quality. Additionally, improvements in patient outcomes and decision-making were acknowledged by 80% of respondents and 97% of participants, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The study indicates that senior-led MDT rounds enhance discussion quality, team collaboration, decision-making, patient outcomes and professional growth. To maintain MDT rounds, daily performance audits, clinical audits and continuous monitoring using common communication platforms are recommended.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bayisa, G., Edessa, D., Deyasa, M., Gobena, G., Obsa, D., Tilahun, T., Shibiru, T., Takele, A., Abera, C., Tigabe, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-16T20:59:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003429</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003429</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Enhancing senior physician-led multidisciplinary team rounds to improve patient care at Wallaga University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, 2025]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003429</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003429</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003501?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Communication among health professionals using newborn technology for care: an exploratory scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003501?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Neonatal technologies can significantly improve care quality and reduce newborn deaths. However, their successful implementation in complex health system contexts requires effective communication among health professionals. A comprehensive understanding of communication among professionals using newborn technologies is needed to inform technology implementation. We conducted a scoping review of the current literature. We searched the grey literature and online resources, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar, for articles. We included English literature that discussed the use of technology in newborn care. 13 papers met the inclusion criteria. We analysed the findings using a thematic approach. 11 of the 13 papers included were based on research conducted in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), with continuous positive airway pressure being the most frequently covered technology. The communication information was limited, as these topics were just one of many themes in the papers. Most studies focused on nurses, encompassing aspects of communication such as knowledge sharing and interactions during patient management, monitoring and documentation. However, there was little detail on the nature of these interactions or where they occurred. Factors influencing communication included physical contexts such as infrastructure, socio-organisational contexts such as hierarchy and levels of skills, and technology-related factors such as perceived usefulness and ease of use. If and how these factors interacted with each other to shape technology-related communication was unclear. We highlight gaps in the literature on communication among health professionals using newborn technology for care. We stress the importance of carefully examining the physical and socio-organisational contextual factors and technology-specific attributes that shape communication in all settings, including LMICs. Research aiming to better understand the context of technology implementation will support the successful implementation of potentially life-saving technologies.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ngaiza, G. K., Oluoch, D., Molyneux, C., Pope, C., Jones, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-16T20:59:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003501</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003501</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Communication among health professionals using newborn technology for care: an exploratory scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003501</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003501</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003463?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Self-harm and Violence Presenting to Emergency Care Registry (SAVER) project: protocol for a mixed-methods study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003463?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Intentional injuries can be broadly classified into those that are self-inflicted (eg, suicide, self-harm), and those that are inflicted by others (eg, homicide, assault). Many risk factors are the same for all intentional injuries. It is widely accepted that there needs to be a public health approach to self-harm and interpersonal violence prevention, including surveillance of presentations to emergency departments. Self-harm and interpersonal violence are important causes of morbidity and mortality in Wales. Interpersonal violence surveillance is already operationalised in Wales, but variables are limited and case ascertainment may not be complete. There is no self-harm register. The aim of this study is to understand the utility of existing systems in North Wales that collect data about self-harm and interpersonal violence, and how a registry could be implemented to address any unmet needs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The project consists of five work packages. First, process mapping will be used to understand the pathways by which patients access emergency care, and how data are collected about patients. Second, routinely collected data will be explored to understand the burden of disease, and the strengths and limitations of existing data collection systems. Third, semi-structured interviews will be completed with stakeholders to understand their needs and experiences. Fourth, semi-structured interviews with third sector organisations which work with people with lived experience of self-harm or interpersonal violence will explore the acceptability of data collection. Fifth, a method will be developed that would enable economic evaluation of a self-harm and interpersonal violence register.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Results will be used to understand whether a self-harm and interpersonal violence registry is required in Wales. The results have the potential to influence local and national strategy on intentional injury prevention. Results will be disseminated to local services, regional and national programme teams, and published as a peer-reviewed journal article.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bebbington, E., Krayer, A., Lea, A., Salmoiraghi, A., Cotter, C., Job, D., Hobson, G., Farr, G., Charlton, G., Moore, J., Varghese, L., Evans, M., Hartfiel, N., Evans, N., Masters, R., Edwards, R. T., Atenstaedt, R., Poole, R., Reilly, R., Robinson, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-14T21:10:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003463</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003463</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Self-harm and Violence Presenting to Emergency Care Registry (SAVER) project: protocol for a mixed-methods study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003463</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003463</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003523?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Informed consent: is it more than a formality? a quality improvement project in surgical practice]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003523?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Informed consent is a fundamental element of clinical practice. A well-structured and understandable consent form not only upholds patients&rsquo; rights but also protects clinicians against medicolegal risks. This quality improvement project aimed to identify deficiencies in the consenting process for surgical procedures and implement changes to enhance patient care. The project was conducted in the Ear Nose Throat Department at Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi, a large tertiary care centre serving a predominantly low socioeconomic population in Pakistan. A total of 80 patients were included across two cycles (40 patients per cycle). Structured interviews and questionnaires were used to assess patient understanding of informed consent components. Key areas for improvement were identified. Educational sessions for doctors were organised and a new, detailed consent form was introduced. The project followed the Plan-Do-Study-Act methodology. Baseline measurements in cycle 1 showed that 15% (n=6) of consent forms were incomplete, reduced to 0% postintervention. A written explanation of the procedure was missing in 57.5% (n=23) of cases initially, improving to 10% (n=4) in cycle 2. Potential complications were not recorded in 37.5% (n=15) of cases at baseline, falling to 10% (n=4) after intervention. Verbal explanation of the procedure was omitted in 32.5% (n=13) of cases initially, reduced to 5% (n=2) postintervention. Documentation of the right to withdraw was absent in 12.5% (n=5) of cases in cycle 1, with full compliance achieved in cycle 2. This project demonstrates that targeted educational interventions and structured consent documentation can significantly improve the quality of the consenting process, promoting safer and more patient-centred care.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Altaf, J., Hasan Ashfaq, A., Riaz, N., Faraz, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-12T02:44:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003523</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003523</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Informed consent: is it more than a formality? a quality improvement project in surgical practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003523</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003523</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003196?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of adding an airway safety prompt to the A-F bundle on unplanned extubation in the intensive care unit]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003196?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Endotracheal intubation is a life-saving intervention for adults with acute respiratory failure (ARF) but may result in unplanned extubation (UE). The success of UE prevention efforts has varied. We describe the development, implementation and impact of an airway safety quality improvement programme (ASQIP) embedded in an existing ABCDEF (A&ndash;F) bundle on UE occurrence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Before-and-after evaluation of an ASQIP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>42-bed mixed intensive care unit (ICU) at a university-affiliated teaching hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients</st>
<p>Consecutive adult patients, endotracheally intubated for ARF.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>The ASQIP, developed from a literature review, the results of a national clinician survey, local clinician focus group input and root cause analyses of prior UE events, included interprofessional rounding scripts and was embedded into an existing A&ndash;F bundle. Multiple implementation strategies were employed, including didactic education to all ICU nurses (registered nurse, RN) and respiratory care therapists (RTs), the daily posting of signs of the ASQIP on the doors of rooms with a patient deemed to be at high risk for UE, and daily reminders from managers to bedside RTs and RNs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Measurements</st>
<p>ASQIP implementation was effective and was associated with a significantly lower incidence of UE per 100 MV days (before 0.43 vs after 0.29; p=0.04).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative that incorporates airway safety within the A&ndash;F bundle may help reduce UE rates in critically ill adults. Future research is needed to validate standardised communication and assess the long-term sustainability of such interventions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tanios, M., Nguyen, H. M., Devlin, J. W., Park, H., Tanios, M., Mahidhara, M. L., Patel, J., Vong, S., Cupino, J., Cordia, M., Beltran, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-10T22:09:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003196</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003196</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of adding an airway safety prompt to the A-F bundle on unplanned extubation in the intensive care unit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003196</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003196</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003441?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Health systems responsiveness in low and middle-income countries (L&MICs): revisiting its scope]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003441?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Health systems responsiveness (HSR) addresses the legitimate non-health expectations of the population and plays a vital role in strengthening health systems and enhancing population health. Identifying specific constructs or domains within HSR is particularly important in the context of low and middle-income countries (L&amp;MICs) to facilitate targeted improvement. Following a comprehensive systematic review of the literature, we developed a conceptual framework for HSR. This study was designed to validate our proposed framework through a Delphi process.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Global HSR experts were contacted via email to participate in the study, and a copy of the proposed framework (12 domains, 53 subdomains) was shared with them. Participants were asked to rate each subdomain on a scale of 1&ndash;5, with 5 being the highest score; based on scientific strength, relevance and feasibility. They also provided suggestions to merge, omit or add domains and subdomains. A subdomain was retained if it received a rating of 4 or 5 from at least 70% of participants for scientific strength and relevance, and 50% or more for feasibility. The final version of the framework was shared with all participants for approval.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Thirteen global health experts participated in the Delphi process. Final version of the HSR framework consisted of 10 domains: respect for dignity, autonomy and confidentiality of information; quality of basic amenities; access to social support networks during care; choice of provider; prompt access to care; attention, clarity of communication and guidance; consideration of financial protection; coordination and continuity of care and 31 subdomains. The overall Cronbach&rsquo;s alpha values were 0.94, 0.93 and 0.96 for the categories of scientific strength, relevance and feasibility of assessment, respectively, indicating very high internal consistency among the Delphi participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>We recommend using this framework to elaborate on HSR across L&amp;MICs, after pretesting within specific contexts.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iqbal, M., Morgan, R., Bauer, C., Cazaban, C. G., Siddiqi, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-10T22:09:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003441</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003441</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Health systems responsiveness in low and middle-income countries (L&MICs): revisiting its scope]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003441</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003441</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003100?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of motivational messages on nurses professional quality of life: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003100?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess the efficacy of motivational messages on nurses&rsquo; professional quality of life and well-being.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>The present systematic review was conducted according to the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, a widely accepted framework for conducting systematic reviews. The researchers used specific keywords to search for eligible studies in several databases. This review covered articles written in English and published between the years 2014 and 2024. Eventually, five articles were included in this review study; in particular, four articles were trial studies and one was a cross-sectional study. The risk of bias and risk of methodological quality of the included studies were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal methods.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The results of the review demonstrate how motivational messages may be an effective strategy for reducing work-related stress among healthcare employees.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>By using technological platforms and employing motivational messages during regular work tasks, healthcare organisations may foster a positive work environment which, in turn, promotes nurses&rsquo; resilience and enhances their well-being.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024576029.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ababneh, A. M. T., Zeilani, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-08T09:00:16-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003100</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003100</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of motivational messages on nurses professional quality of life: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003100</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003100</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003386?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of a 24/7 on-site percutaneous coronary intervention team strategy on door-to-wire time]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003386?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Current guidelines recommend that the door-to-wire (D2W) time should be &lt;90 min in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study evaluated the effect of a 24/7 on-site PCI team strategy on the D2W time.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In this single-centre, retrospective study, patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI within 1 year before (control group, n=143) and 1 year after (intervention group, n=96) implementing a 24/7 on-site PCI team strategy were enrolled. This strategy required that the PCI team was always available in hospital to minimise the time required to make the catheterisation laboratory ready for PCI. The primary endpoint was the D2W time, and the secondary endpoints were the rate of delayed PCI (D2W time &ge;90 min) and the on-site time of the PCI team members. Multivariate analysis was conducted to determine the independent predictors of delayed PCI in the intervention group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The D2W time was shorter (52 vs 97 min, p&lt;0.001), the rate of delayed PCI was lower (19.8% vs 55.2%, p&lt;0.001), but the on-site time of the PCI team members (35 040 vs 9960 hours) was longer in the intervention group than in the control group. Time-to-obtain electrocardiogram &gt;10 min (p=0.027) and time-to-make STEMI diagnosis &gt;9 min (p<I>=</I>0.001) were independent predictors of delayed PCI after implementing the strategy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Implementing a 24/7 on-site PCI team strategy was associated with reductions in the D2W time and the rate of delayed PCI but an increase in the on-site time of the PCI team members.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, L., Yang, X., Wu, W., Tian, R., Yang, M., Han, Y., Shen, J., Qian, H., Guo, F., Zhang, T., Zhu, X., Jin, X., Wang, C., Xie, H., Fan, Z., Shen, Z., Liu, J., Zhang, Z., Ma, X., Liu, Z., Zhu, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-08T09:00:16-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003386</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003386</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of a 24/7 on-site percutaneous coronary intervention team strategy on door-to-wire time]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003386</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003386</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003270?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence approach to optimise safety for hospitalised patients with dementia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003270?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The aim of the study is to develop a machine learning (ML) model to identify contributing factors to dementia-related safety events using patient safety event report data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>This study uses dementia-related safety event reports from a patient safety reporting system of a 10-hospital health system in the USA. Contributing factors to safety events were coded using the Yorkshire contributory factors framework based on free-text descriptions in the reports. The coded event reports were used to develop two ML models using eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), one to classify situational patient factors and another to classify active failures relating to human error.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We used 1387 safety event reports for model development, 989 (71.3%) reports related to situational factors and 119 (8.6%) reports related to active failures. The model for situational factors achieved a precision of 0.843 and a recall of 0.826. The F1 score was 0.834, indicating a balance of precision and recall performance. The specificity of the model was 0.639 and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) was 0.833. The final model for active failure achieved a precision of 0.333 and a recall of 0.056. The F1 score was 0.095, reflective of imbalanced precision and recall performance. The specificity of the model was 0.992, indicating a strong ability to identify negative cases, and the ROC AUC was 0.817.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>ML techniques can provide insights into situational factors and active failures that drive dementia-related safety events. These insights can inform targeted interventions such as specialised staff training for behavioural symptoms management and pharmacist-led medication optimisation, to enhance care and safety for hospitalised people living with dementia.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bangerter, L., Fong, A., Zabala, G., Kim, Y. K., Tabaie, A., Werner, N. E., De Jonge, K. E., Ratwani, R. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-03T04:36:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003270</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003270</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence approach to optimise safety for hospitalised patients with dementia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003270</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003270</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003349?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nationwide data-driven quality improvement in ultrasound medicine: insights from an indicator-based initiative in China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003349?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>There are only a limited number of countries systematically tracking the quality of ultrasound at the national and institutional levels. Our study presents an example of a national, data-driven approach to ultrasound medicine quality measurement and improvement through indicators.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>This study aims to establish a nationwide, indicator-based framework for measuring and improving the quality of ultrasound medicine in China. By developing and applying quality indicators, we seek to systematically evaluate performance, identify areas for improvement and guide data-driven quality enhancement efforts across institutions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>To enhance ultrasound quality and improve quality management, a leadership team was established. Pertinent quality indicators were developed as evaluation metrics. Quality improvement programmes were designed following the identification of key causes of suboptimal performance. A Plan-Do-Study-Act method was applied. Nationwide sample surveys were conducted annually to collect and document the relevant quality data. 10 ultrasound quality indicators were selected and comparisons of data from 2020 to 2023 were made. <sup>2</sup> tests were used to evaluate statistical differences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The ultrasound instruments quality inspection rate, the completion rate of notification of ultrasound critical findings within 10 min, the qualification rate of ultrasound reports remained and the completion rate of inpatient ultrasound examinations within 48 hours remained consistently high. The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System utilisation rate of breast lesions in ultrasound reports, the concordance rate of ultrasound diagnoses, the accuracy rate of ultrasound diagnosis of breast lesions and the concordance rate of ultrasound diagnosis of &ge;50% carotid stenosis all improved and showed an upward trend.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Indicator-based data can drive nationwide measurement, improvement and monitoring of ultrasound medicine quality. The use of indicators supports sustained efforts to improve quality and safety in ultrasound services.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zeng, A., Zhang, R., Ma, L., Tao, X., Gao, L., Li, J., Wang, H., Jiang, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-03T04:36:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003349</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003349</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nationwide data-driven quality improvement in ultrasound medicine: insights from an indicator-based initiative in China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003349</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003349</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003456?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating the implementation of the Saving Babies Lives Care Bundle Version 2 from service user and healthcare professionals perspectives: a questionnaire study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003456?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The Saving Babies&rsquo; Lives Care Bundle (SBLCB) was introduced in England in 2015 and was updated in 2019 (SBLCBv2). This study aimed to describe the degree to which SBLCBv2 was implemented in practice and describe contemporary experiences of receiving and delivering antenatal and intrapartum care informed by the recommendations of SBLCBv2.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted in 28 National Health Service maternity units across England between October and December 2023. The study had two arms, one for maternity service users and one for healthcare professionals. Maternity service users aged &ge;16 years who had given birth in the last 12 months were invited to participate in an online survey which contained closed questions about elements of the SBLCBv2, and two free-text questions about their experiences of receiving antenatal and intrapartum care. Maternity healthcare professionals from participating sites were invited to complete a separate questionnaire about delivering care. Responses were summarised by descriptive statistics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>1140 women and 633 healthcare professionals participated. The majority of staff reported implementing all five elements of SBLCBv2, though this varied from 57% (prevention of preterm birth) to 99% (smoking cessation). Service users frequently reported receiving interventions that were part of SBLCBv2: 26% were offered Aspirin and 97% monitored fetal movement. Staff generally reported positive experiences of implementing the SBLCBv2, feeling that it supported clinical decision making. 89% and 86% of service users reported a positive experience in pregnancy and labour, respectively. This was underpinned by positive staff attitudes, behaviours and communication, and being listened to and involved in decisions about care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>SBLCBv2 has been integrated into clinical practice, though some elements require additional focus to increase implementation (e.g., preterm birth). Maternity staff may benefit from additional training to discuss the reasons for and results of interventions to reduce the risk of pregnancy complications.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Widdows, K., Reid, H., Smith, D. M., Wood-Harper, R., Camacho, E., Roberts, S. A., Heazell, A. E. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-02T16:05:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003456</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003456</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating the implementation of the Saving Babies Lives Care Bundle Version 2 from service user and healthcare professionals perspectives: a questionnaire study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003456</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003456</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002956?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Restraint reduction during psychiatric intensive care: a controlled bi-phasic time series evaluation of a culture change intervention]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002956?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Restrictive practices (ie, physical restraint, rapid tranquilisation and seclusion) are used to manage risk of harm to self and/or others during inpatient psychiatric admissions. Restrictive practices can be physically and psychologically hazardous for both patients and staff, but there have been few well-controlled evaluations of interventions to reduce restrictive practices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To conduct a controlled evaluation of the implementation of a culture change intervention on a psychiatric intensive care unit (PICU) compared with a control PICU on use of restraint.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A new staff role was created on the intervention PICU (ie, the <I>reducing restrictive interventions advocate</I>; RRIA). The RRIA met with patients/carers and advised, trained, supervised and debriefed the multidisciplinary team concerning restraint. Mixed methods evaluated the effectiveness of the RRIA role. Restraint outcomes on the intervention and the control PICU were compared pre (19 months) and post intervention (19 months). Qualitative interviews were conducted with the RRIA, the PICU ward manager and the RRI organisational lead.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>On the intervention PICU, there were significant reductions in the use of seclusion, full restraint and use of standing holds. Qualitatively, positive changes to the safety culture of the intervention PICU were reported, and these were consistently rated as important, impactful and unlikely without the RRIA role.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>PICU safety culture can improve when specific roles focused on changing ward practices around restraints are implemented. More controlled evaluations of reducing restraint interventions on PICUs are needed.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Green, E., Kellett, S., Gaskell, C., Hobbs, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-02T06:23:22-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002956</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-002956</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Restraint reduction during psychiatric intensive care: a controlled bi-phasic time series evaluation of a culture change intervention]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e002956</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e002956</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003401?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pharmacist-led guideline-directed medical therapy in heart failure: impact analysis in primary care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003401?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Optimal guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) can reduce mortality, unplanned hospital admissions and improve quality of life for patients suffering from heart failure (HF). However, GDMT remains underused in primary care. Only a minority of patients on HF registers receive optimal GDMT in the UK. This suboptimal care is compounded by a mounting lack of GP capacity and the growing burden of HF.</p>
<p>A multisite, quantitative impact analysis was undertaken to evaluate the optimisation of HF patients by a novel pharmacist-led GDMT model in UK primary care.</p>
<p>We identified low-risk HF patients suitable for pharmacists&rsquo; input, including a community validated risk stratification tool&mdash;the HF Event STrengthening Score. The primary outcome was to compare the proportion of patients on optimal HF GDMT at 6 months and 2 years with baseline. Secondary outcomes were direct personnel healthcare costs and GP workload. A subgroup analysis was modelled to estimate effect on mortality, hospitalisation and quality of life.</p>
<p>A total of 237 patients were included. Pharmacist-led GDMT contributed to the increase of optimal GDMT from 17.7% at baseline to 76.5% at 6 months and 94.5% at 2 years follow-up. The novel approach reduced GPs&rsquo; HF GDMT workload by 36.6% at 6 months and 42.1% at 2 years and healthcare costs by 18.4% at 6 months and 20.3% at 2 years. Patients with combined angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor/sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor treatment indicated a reduction of 20.8% in cardiovascular mortality, a reduction of 34.8% in hospitalisations and a 5.31 Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Score for improved quality of life at 2 years.</p>
<p>For low-risk HF patients, pharmacist-led optimisation achieved significantly higher GDMT rates, reduced personnel healthcare costs, reduced GPs&rsquo; workload, contributed to reduced cardiovascular mortality, reduced hospitalisations and improved quality of life. In the context of current workload pressures, this approach should be considered for widespread implementation in general practice.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schichtel, M., Barclay, S., Papworth, H., Mills, L., Bowers, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-01T07:40:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003401</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003401</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pharmacist-led guideline-directed medical therapy in heart failure: impact analysis in primary care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003401</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003401</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003417?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rapid access microscopy and real-time case discussion via a secure messaging app improves diagnostic accuracy and management of acute hot swollen joints]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003417?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Patients with acute swollen joints are often presumed to have septic arthritis, leading to intravenous antibiotics and arthroscopic washout. Previously at our centre, joint fluid aspirates often lacked crystal analysis, resulting in excess culture-negative septic arthritis diagnoses. We developed a &lsquo;Hot Joint Pathway&rsquo;, hypothesising that since acute crystal arthropathy can be misdiagnosed as &lsquo;culture-negative septic arthritis&rsquo;, introducing the pathway would improve diagnostic accuracy.</p>
<p>This pathway provides a structured approach for investigating acutely swollen joints, distinguishing septic arthritis from crystal arthritis. Key features include a secure messaging app for multidisciplinary discussion and rheumatology-led point-of-care polarised light microscopy (POC PLM) &lt;24 hours 6 days per week. A service evaluation of hospital inpatient data identified patients labelled with septic arthritis admitted between two periods: before (1 January 2019&ndash;30 November 2020) and after (27 September 2022&ndash;29 February 2024) pathway implementation. Emergency department (ED) patients discussed via the app were also analysed (27 September 2022&ndash;25 September 2023).</p>
<p>Among ED patients, 92% received rheumatology input, and 100% underwent joint aspiration with rheumatologist-led crystal analysis in &lt;24 hours. 68% avoided hospital admission, receiving same-day discharge. Of these, 53% were diagnosed with crystal arthropathy and were discharged with planned outpatient follow-up.</p>
<p>Diagnostic accuracy increased for inpatients following pathway introduction. Joint aspirates increased from 50% to 76% (p=0.034). Culture-negative cases of septic arthritis reduced from 34% to 17% and culture positive cases increased from 41% to 76% (p&lt;0.005). Crystal analysis increased from 19% to 28%. Positive blood cultures increased from 28% to 41%. Mean length of stay decreased from 26 to 23 days.</p>
<p>A structured care pathway combining rheumatology-led POC PLM and multidisciplinary discussion increases diagnostic accuracy, facilitates admission avoidance and reduces hospital stay for patients with acute swollen joints. Rheumatology-led PLM is essential for the success of this pathway.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lewis, A., McCarthy, G. M., Cowley, S., Swift, C., Corish, O., Taha, K., Abdalla, A., Breslin, T., Lyons, F., Muldoon, E., McDermott, C., Alemayehu, H., Boughton, O., Stack, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-01T07:40:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003417</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003417</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rapid access microscopy and real-time case discussion via a secure messaging app improves diagnostic accuracy and management of acute hot swollen joints]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003417</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003417</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003383?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['Alone on our NF1 island: a patient-led mixed-method survey study to understand the care pathway for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients in the UK]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003383?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), a rare genetic disorder characterised by neurofibroma growth, affects approximately 25 000 individuals in the UK. Its wide range of clinical manifestations presents significant challenges in providing comprehensive care for patients. In agreement with National Health Service England&rsquo;s Commissioners, Childhood Tumour Trust initiated a patient-led service evaluation to understand existing care pathways and identify factors influencing patient satisfaction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The study was coproduced with patient charities, clinicians and the Patient Led Research Hub. Online surveys were composed for patients, families, carers (PFCs) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) and disseminated through charity and healthcare networks. Structured features were analysed using descriptive statistics to review pathways and examine correlations with care satisfaction. Free-text responses were coded and analysed thematically to explore PFCs&rsquo; and HPCs&rsquo; experiences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 1083 PFC and 94 HCP responses were received from across the UK (783 and 49 were complete, respectively). Overall, 54% PFCs expressed dissatisfaction with NF1 care. While London had a significantly higher satisfaction rate (64%; p=0.01) than the national average, Scotland (30%, p=0.01) and Northern Ireland (16%, p=0.01) had significantly lower rates. Influencing factors included poor care coordination, long specialist wait times and insufficient signposting to charities. Regarding diagnosis and management, 46 HCP roles, 35 referral routes and 16 sources of management guidelines were identified, indicating a lack of clear pathways and care standardisation. Free-text data revealed additional challenges, including limited education and information for families, low NF1 awareness among professionals, inequitable access to specialists and a desire for holistic care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This evaluation revealed UK-wide dissatisfaction with NF1 care and a pressing need for system-level changes to improve regional disparities and care coordination, enhance patient education and HCP training and establish standardised pathways with a holistic model to enable high-quality equitable care for all NF1 patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ju, S., Cowley, L., Jain, I., Martin, V., Day, E., Smith, R., Morgan, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-28T05:36:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003383</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003383</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA['Alone on our NF1 island: a patient-led mixed-method survey study to understand the care pathway for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients in the UK]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003383</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003383</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003392?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Fatal anaphylactic shock following cefoperazone-sulbactam re-exposure: a short report on systemic gaps in adverse drug reaction management]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003392?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This report presents a case of fatal anaphylactic shock following re-exposure to cefoperazone-sulbactam, highlighting systemic gaps in adverse drug reaction (ADR) management. The patient initially tolerated the drug without immediate adverse effects but developed severe hypersensitivity reactions upon subsequent exposures, ultimately leading to death. Analysis revealed that the healthcare team underestimated the risk of delayed IgE-mediated sensitization, and critical allergy information was not documented in the emergency department (ED). Additionally, the electronic health record (EHR) system lacked real-time allergy alerts. Fragmented communication during care transitions and technological deficiencies further exacerbated the risks.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mo, X., Liang, G., Gan, W., Xu, L., Yan, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-27T08:54:08-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003392</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003392</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Fatal anaphylactic shock following cefoperazone-sulbactam re-exposure: a short report on systemic gaps in adverse drug reaction management]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003392</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003392</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003248?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A one-stop clinic improvement project for postmenopausal bleeding in NHS Forth Valley]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003248?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Referrals for postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) were creating a pressure point within a general gynaecology outpatient clinic in NHS Forth Valley (NHSFV) in Scotland. This project originated in concerns around delays in time from referral to diagnosis as a result of this pressure point.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>The aim of this project was to test the efficiency of a process change which reduced waiting time from referral to diagnosis for patients with PMB.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Use Active Clinical Referral Triage (ACRT) and a one-stop clinic to reduce waiting lists. Quality improvement methods including data collection and process mapping were used to understand the current system. Cycles of the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) tool were applied to test the concept of introducing a one-stop clinic for PMB.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Qualitative data gathered during the project showed that patients preferred the one-stop clinic. Limited quantitative data indicated the one-stop clinic design reduced PMB referral waiting time for patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Our aim was to streamline a process to reduce waiting time between referral and diagnosis for patients with PMB. This was achieved by the creation of a one-stop clinic for PMB/unscheduled bleeding on HRT (hormone replacement therapy) patients. The work to date has highlighted the efficiency of the new process and ultimately suggests the potential for a reduction in waiting times in this pathway.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robinson, A., Wilson, D., Mahal, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-26T05:58:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003248</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003248</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A one-stop clinic improvement project for postmenopausal bleeding in NHS Forth Valley]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003248</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003248</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003334?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Streamlining organ donation: impact of an artificial intelligence-based protocol post-brain death]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003334?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Delays in organ retrieval following brain death (BD) can compromise organ viability, increasing the risk of post-transplant complications. In 2021, the Transplant Authority of Tamil Nadu, India, implemented an artificial intelligence (AI)-based application aimed at expediting data verification to reduce delays and improve transparency in organ procurement. This retrospective observational study evaluated the effect of this intervention and identified key factors contributing to delays.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data were collected from organ donors declared dead by neurological criteria (DND) between January 2018 and December 2023. Donors were categorised into two groups: pre-AI implementation (P1) and post-AI implementation (P2). Factors leading to delay were classified into four domains: family-related, physician-related, institution-related and government-related domains. A fishbone analysis was used to identify root causes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 45 DND cases were analysed. The median time from the first apnoea test to organ procurement was 1657 (IQR, 1499&ndash;1899) min. A statistically significant increase in the retrieval time was observed at P2: 1587 (IQR, 1328&ndash;1779) min at P1 vs 1660 min (IQR, 1556&ndash;1959) at P2 (p=0.04). This increase was primarily driven by longer delays in transferring patients to the operating room after legal verification, which rose from 125 (IQR, 96&ndash;231) to 384 (IQR, 186&ndash;457) min (p=0.002).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study underscores critical factors affecting organ retrieval timelines in a low-income to middle-income setting. While the AI-based protocol enhanced data verification and transparency, it also introduced unanticipated procedural delays. Ongoing evaluation and iterative refinement of AI tools are essential to optimise organ procurement efficiency and clinical outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ER, S., P, J., Nair, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-26T05:58:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003334</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003334</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Streamlining organ donation: impact of an artificial intelligence-based protocol post-brain death]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003334</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003334</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003466?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Invisible harm in patient safety: a framework and definition for preventable psychological harm in cancer care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003466?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>While patient safety is receiving increasing attention in healthcare services research and policies, it is mainly centred around prevention of physical harm. Preventable psychological harm (PPH) remains invisible in reports and quality measurements. As patients with cancer are particularly vulnerable due to the severity of their condition and therapies, they are exposed to risks such as non-physical adverse events. Recently, incidents of psychological harm have gained more attention in patient safety research, but a common and accepted definition and classification are missing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>We aimed to develop a common definition of PPH and a corresponding framework to classify events, settled within patient safety concepts and terminology.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Through a literature review, expert interviews from various healthcare backgrounds and workshops with patient representatives, we gathered information on PPH, which was reviewed and structured by an interdisciplinary research team (patient safety, psycho-oncology, palliative care research, nursing, organisational psychology). The final definition and framework were iteratively developed taking into account existing patient safety concepts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The definition broadens the classification of PPH to include a wide range of commissions and omissions by individuals or organizational practices within the health care system. These actions and inactions result in consequences of varying severity for patients and their close ones. The framework complements the definition of PPH, including those impacted by PPH, types of PPH, potential causes and contributing factors, vulnerabilities influencing severity and occurrence, moderating factors for mitigation and negative consequences of PPH.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Defining and classifying PPH is the first step to make it accessible for measurement, analysis and prevention. Its integration within patient safety terminology is important to ensure uptake and integration in research and practice.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dreismann, L., Zambrano, S., Pfeiffer, Y., Schwappach, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-26T05:58:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003466</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003466</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Invisible harm in patient safety: a framework and definition for preventable psychological harm in cancer care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003466</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003466</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003271?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of patient satisfaction after primary care system interventions: a follow-up study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003271?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The Philippine Primary Care Studies implemented interventions that aimed to improve primary care services in selected urban, rural and remote communities. This study aims to describe trends in patient satisfaction in years 2 and 3 after implementation of primary care interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This study is a serial cross-sectional study that assessed patient satisfaction under the domains of healthcare availability, service efficiency, technical competency, environment, location, health communication, handling and general perception in three primary care sites. Patient satisfaction was obtained via a 16-item questionnaire at baseline, and at 2 and 3 years after implementation. Pairwise testing was conducted to compare significant changes across sites over the time points.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>There were 200 respondents per time point for each of the three sites. Despite the cessation of funding, system changes allowed significant improvements in patient satisfaction at the urban site. The improvements were noted in 12 out of 16 items in year 3 compared with baseline. These items belonged to the domains of healthcare availability, service efficiency, technical competency, health communication, handling and general perception. At the rural site, patient satisfaction decreased in 4 out of 16 items by year 3. These items belonged to the domains of handling and general perception. At the remote site, a significant decline in patient satisfaction was noted in 8 out of 16 items by year 3. These items belonged to the domains of healthcare availability, service efficiency, environment, location and health communication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Patient satisfaction increased in the urban site and declined in the rural and remote site 3 years after implementation of a primary care system, when funding ended. This suggests that patient satisfaction in the urban centre was related more to the system improvements rather than fund augmentation.</p>
<p>In contrast, it was more difficult to improve patient satisfaction in the rural and remote sites for two reasons. First, baseline satisfaction was much higher in these areas. This was probably because patients did not have alternative options for care and were therefore more appreciative. Second, cessation of financial aid led to an inability to sustain the system changes that were implemented on initiation. Their brief experience with primary care enhancements may have added perspective on pre-existing deficiencies they previously did not notice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Modest financing and systemic improvements in primary care can lead to a significant increase in patient satisfaction. If funding is not sustained, however, patient satisfaction may decline significantly, especially in remote and underserved areas.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fabian, N. M., Tan-Lim, C. S. C., Dans, L. F., Javelosa, M. A. U., Dans, A. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-24T17:18:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003271</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003271</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of patient satisfaction after primary care system interventions: a follow-up study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003271</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003271</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003104?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Task shifting: a key aspect to improving care for women at risk of preterm birth]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003104?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Local problem</st>
<p>Until April 2021, women presenting to maternity triage with symptoms of threatened preterm labour (TPTL) and/or preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM) were triaged by a doctor. Depending on the acuity on the labour ward, women in triage often had a long wait for a doctor&rsquo;s review. These delays create anxiety for women and impair the capacity of triage midwives to care for other women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The Plan-Do-Study-Act method of quality improvement was used for this project. 3 months prior to the intervention, the baseline assessment was women&rsquo;s wait time for medical review when presenting with TPTL and/or PPROM.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>Triage midwives were trained in performing speculum examination on preterm (&lt;37 weeks&rsquo; gestation) women to allow quicker review. Waiting time for review by a midwife vs doctor was compared using data collected between January and December 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>88 eligible women were identified. 44 cases (intervention group) had their initial assessment by the triage midwife, while 44 cases (control group) had their initial assessment by a doctor. The mean waiting time between arrival and performance of quantitative fetal fibronectin (qfFN) in the intervention group was 67 min (SD=42.7), compared with 127 min (SD=61.2) in the control group (p&lt;0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the waiting time between arrival and discharge/admission.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Women presenting with symptoms of TPTL are reviewed on average twice as quickly by the triage midwife compared with a doctor, allowing a quick reassurance for those where TPTL/PPROM has been excluded. However, the overall waiting time in triage was similar, as women in our unit currently need a doctor&rsquo;s review before discharge.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frei, L. N. I., Carlisle, N., Manton, Z., Bolten, M., Watson, H. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-22T02:23:54-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003104</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003104</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Task shifting: a key aspect to improving care for women at risk of preterm birth]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003104</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003104</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003197?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Low-touch approach empowering clinical teams to improve the medical on-call communication experience]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003197?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background/purpose</st>
<p>Team functioning is integral to providing high quality patient care. Improving communication during on-call medical coverage requires a level of individual engagement that can be challenging to achieve in large organisations, particularly in a climate of high population healthcare needs and health human resource limitations. This project represents a novel approach through engaging care providers in addressing on-call communication culture using a systems approach and quality improvement methodology.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Factors that influence the interdisciplinary experience of making, receiving and responding to calls about patient care were identified. An asynchronous action series addressed the key drivers of a good call experience.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The Good Call Action Series was developed collaboratively by interdisciplinary teams. Six multidisciplinary teams across seven specialties participated over 5 months. A modified team effectiveness score demonstrated a 13% improvement on completion of the action series.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>System thinking can be effectively applied to the complexity of the on-call experience for all members of the healthcare team. Clinical teams can develop team functioning skills and solve complex on-call communication issues with minimal support and without structured quality improvement training. Low-touch, time-efficient activities designed and delivered using quality improvement methodology can effectively address team-based care delivery challenges.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harrison, A. M., Porter, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-22T02:23:54-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003197</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003197</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Low-touch approach empowering clinical teams to improve the medical on-call communication experience]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research [amp   ] reporting methodology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003197</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003197</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003303?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Enhancing patient flow through standardised discharge pathways for neurology and medicine services]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003303?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and objectives</st>
<p>Poor discharge planning impairs hospital throughput, adds to the financial strain on health systems and diminishes patient and provider satisfaction. We developed consensus-based discharge criteria coupled with a standardised discharge pathway for four presenting diagnoses and tracked their effect on discharge timing and length of stay (LOS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Medical readiness for discharge criteria for patients diagnosed with transient ischaemic attack, seizure, demyelinating disease or syncope were generated by expert consensus at our institution. A standardised discharge pathway was developed for eligible patients based on discussions with stakeholders and staff. Discharge timing and readmissions were tracked for 6 months pre-intervention and 12 months post-intervention (divided into 6 months of implementation and post-implementation periods). The primary outcome was a discharge time of &le;2 hours for 60% of patients during the implementation period. Secondary outcomes included reduced time to discharge (TTD) and LOS compared with the pre-intervention period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>318 total patient visits were included across the baseline, implementation and post-implementation periods. Median TTD improved from 171 min at baseline to 88 and 92 min, respectively, during the implementation and post-implementation periods. Median LOS similarly decreased from 94 hours to 35 and 30 hours, respectively. All primary and secondary outcomes were achieved during the implementation period and sustained post-implementation. The rate of emergency department visits and hospital readmissions within 30 days remained low (~1.5%) post-intervention. Additionally, most providers reported that the intervention improved clinical workflow.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This standardised discharge framework improved discharge efficiency for patients with four common diagnoses during an 18-month quality improvement study. The framework and its implementation are highly scalable, and similar systems-level approaches should be considered by hospitals to improve throughput.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McCrimmon, C. M., Fensterwald, M. R., Czypinski, L. K., Nuwer, M. R., Abelon, S. E., Reider-Demer, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-22T02:23:54-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003303</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003303</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Enhancing patient flow through standardised discharge pathways for neurology and medicine services]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003303</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003303</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003455?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What should a learning health system look like?]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003455?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Learning health systems have been defined as "a team, provider or group of providers in the health and care system that, working with a community of stakeholders, has developed the ability to learn from its own delivery of routine care and improve as a result".<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> The concept of learning health systems is gaining traction,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2&ndash;4</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3"></cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4"></cross-ref> including as a means of accelerating the translation of clinical evidence into practice. But how can healthcare system leaders and researchers ensure that their development moves beyond aspirations and rhetoric?</p> <p>We draw on the experience of our collaborative evolution towards a primary care learning health system and consider the conditions necessary for such a system. We call for greater integration of research and quality improvement and a sharper definition of learning health systems.</p> <sec id="s1"><st>Barriers to the implementation of clinical evidence in primary care</st> <p>Clinical research can...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foy, R., Carder, P., Johnson, S., Copsey, B., Alderson, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-22T02:23:54-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003455</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003455</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What should a learning health system look like?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003455</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003455</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003363?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transforming care with community breast pain clinics: a validated innovative solution benefitting patients and the healthcare system]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003363?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Rationale</st>
<p>Literature shows that breast pain alone has no significant association with breast cancer. Currently, patients experiencing these symptoms are often referred to breast cancer diagnostic clinics (BCDCs), leading to an increase in unnecessary anxiety and overutilisation of already strained secondary care resources. The East Midlands Breast Pain Pathway (EMBPP) aims to establish a new pathway that improves patient care and eases pressure on BCDCs, as well as being cost-beneficial and providing a positive patient experience.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim and objectives</st>
<p>This study aims to evaluate the impact of the EMBPP on patient care, including safety, costs incurred by the health system and patient experience.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The EMBPP was analysed quantitatively and qualitatively using data extracted from the community breast pain clinics (CBPCs), BCDCs, patient-reported outcome measures, clinic costs, family history data and staff interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Breast cancer incidence within the cohort of patients with a full 12-month follow-up period was shown to be 3.7 per 1000 patients, below the population estimates in the literature. There was no delay to care for those who were diagnosed with breast cancer after attending a CBPC. The clinics were found to be cost-beneficial, with a cost-benefit ratio of 1.26 in year 1, 1.40 in year 2 and 1.56 in year 3. The pathway was positively received by patients, with 98.7% indicating that they would recommend the service.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Following on from previous audits and analysis of the EMBPP pathway, this national evaluation has shown that CBPCs are effective across multiple Cancer Alliances, National Health Service (NHS) Trusts and demographics. The CBPC offers a positive patient experience and is cost-beneficial and safe, with no evidence of a delay to care for the patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robertson, J., Bartholomeuz, T., Rogers, V., Clifton, K., Gilchrist, I., Griffiths, E., Sibbering, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-19T21:15:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003363</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003363</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transforming care with community breast pain clinics: a validated innovative solution benefitting patients and the healthcare system]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003363</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003363</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003505?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Implementation of an acute abdominal pain diagnostic pathway in the emergency department]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003505?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Acute abdominal pain is a common acute presentation to the emergency department (ED). Contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT (AP CT) is typically the most appropriate imaging test. Previously in our ED, it was noted that the process to access AP CT was complicated and associated with delays. We implemented a quality intervention project to develop and implement a diagnostic pathway of ED patients with acute abdominal pain requiring AP CT imaging. Our overall aim was to improve ED length of stay and ED process times for patients presenting with acute abdominal pathology to our ED.</p>
<p>After baseline data collection, we conducted a phased improvement project with pre-measurement and post-measurement. A rationalised multidisciplinary diagnostic pathway was agreed by the radiology, general surgery and emergency medicine teams. The imaging protocol for AP CT abdomens was revised using intravenous contrast only for the majority of patients. The ED length of stay statistically significantly improved from the pre-implementation period (1532 min), the first evaluation (1312 min) and the second evaluation period (1216 min) (p value&lt;0.01). There was a non-statistically significant improvement in the mean-time from ED arrival to AP CT scan in the pre-implementation and post implementation phases (855 min in pre-implementation phase and 670 min and 621 min in the first and second phases, respectively, p=0.06). The overall positivity for significant acute pathology on CT abdomen in the implementation loop was 79.6%.</p>
<p>The introduction of an acute abdominal pain diagnostic pathway improved ED throughput times and reduced admission rates in patients presenting to the ED with acute abdominal pain. The high diagnostic yield from AP CT scans indicates that our pathway was appropriate for ED patients with undifferentiated acute abdominal pain requiring urgent advanced imaging.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blomerus, S., Splinter, T.-L., Gillis, A., Buckley, O., Turner, H., McCabe, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-19T21:15:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003505</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003505</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Implementation of an acute abdominal pain diagnostic pathway in the emergency department]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003505</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003505</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003224?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transforming improvement training at scale with essential digital training skills]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003224?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Internationally, healthcare systems are facing global issues due to rising costs and an ageing population. System-wide improvement is needed to help address these issues. Therefore, large-scale training of staff in improvement skills is required.</p>
<p>An established method of training at scale is digitally delivered training, including Massive-Open-Online-Courses (MOOCs). Within the National Health Service in England, wide-scale variation exists in digital education and training standards. This study evaluates an education programme, known as MOOC School, that sought to address educational skills shortfalls by training subject matter experts and trainers in interactive, online learning techniques.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This evaluation assessed the MOOC School training programme&rsquo;s impact on participants&rsquo; ability to design, develop and deliver online learning. A mixed-methods approach was used, with data collected from existing application and attendance records, surveys and interviews with volunteers who self-identified as having put the learning into practice. The study aimed to identify key success factors of a health educator digital upskilling programme.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The MOOC School programme ran seven formal cohorts over 3 years with 96 participants and 2 informal, coaching style cohorts with 14 participants the following year. The programme was well received with 97% rating the course as good or very good. MOOC School helped participants to reach over 30 000 enrolments through courses they created with their teams after undertaking the training, filling a significant gap. Participants reported gaining important skills and insights into the art of what is possible in delivering training in new ways.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The experience and plans of the participants support the need for more creative training practices and digitally literate health educators to deliver the training that is required. The findings of the evaluation highlight a way forward in defining the essential skills and knowledge needed to create high-quality digital learning at scale.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Herbert, M., Smith, I. M., Guest, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-18T23:19:49-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003224</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003224</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transforming improvement training at scale with essential digital training skills]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality education report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003224</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003224</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003310?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identifying facilitators, barriers and areas of opportunity in diabetic retinopathy screening: quality improvement through qualitative methods]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003310?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective </st>
<p>Quality improvement efforts have aimed to improve annual diabetic retinopathy screening at our institution, but rates remain well below goal. To better understand facilitators, barriers and operational issues unique to our health system and to develop a comprehensive understanding of the care pathway, the Patient Voice toolkit was applied.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods </st>
<p>In-depth interviews were conducted individually with patients and care team members in a large urban academic medical centre with multiple satellite community clinics. Interviews with patients focused on facilitators and barriers to annual diabetic retinopathy screening. These interviews were transcribed and organised into discrete codes to identify initial themes. We interviewed clinic staff involved in diabetic retinopathy examination scheduling, execution or quality assurance. Interviews with care team members focused on training materials, camera operations and workflow.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results </st>
<p>Through analysis of 15 patient interviews, we found that facilitators included internal motivation, automated examination reminders, reminders from providers and utilisation of local optometry offices. Barriers included competing demands, distant retinal camera locations, limited appointment access and financial and insurance issues. Interviews with 13 care team members resulted in the creation of a process map, and areas of opportunity were identified in the training and operational workflows.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions </st>
<p>The inclusion of different stakeholder perspectives provides in-depth insight into facilitators and barriers to completing annual diabetic retinopathy screening, allowing for recommendations tailored to our specific health system and operations. Suggested operational improvements include expanding clinics that can perform this examination, increasing appointment flexibility, partnering with local optometry clinics and enhancing annual examination reminders to include more details about the examination. Recommendations suggested by staff include increasing patient education, setting expectations around the examination and implementing real-time feedback on image quality.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Du, S., Freeby, M., Han, M., Lambrechts, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-18T23:19:49-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003310</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003310</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identifying facilitators, barriers and areas of opportunity in diabetic retinopathy screening: quality improvement through qualitative methods]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003310</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003310</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003134?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measuring health confidence: benefits to patients, clinicians and healthcare providers]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003134?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Patients need a high level of health confidence to manage their own care with success. However, health confidence is complex and changes throughout life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The Health Confidence Score (HCS) is a measure of a patient&rsquo;s confidence and has four items covering their opinion of their health knowledge, ability to self-care, get help and participate in shared decision-making, plus an aggregate summary score. It is a short, easy-to-use measure with a low reading age.</p>
<p>Data from about 5000 ratings are analysed, coming from anonymised patients living out of hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Findings show a highly significant improvement in health confidence between referral and follow-up after care and treatment. Health confidence is inversely related to the number of medications taken. The highest health confidence is in patients aged between 30 and 49. The lowest health confidence is in patients aged between 50 and 69. No significant difference in health confidence between male and female patients. Health confidence is a different concept from health status and personal well-being.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Integrating HCS into routine care fosters patient-centred healthcare, promotes self-care and can reduce cost of care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benson, T., Benson, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-17T13:59:49-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003134</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003134</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measuring health confidence: benefits to patients, clinicians and healthcare providers]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003134</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003134</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002972?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of a learning collaborative on team-based care: qualitative analysis of coaching calls using normalisation process theory]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002972?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Evaluation of learning collaboratives (LC) needs to account for not just outcomes and context, but also the mechanisms participating teams use to implement and normalise new practices. Normalisation process theory (NPT) mechanisms&mdash;<I>coherence</I>, <I>cognitive participation</I>,<I> collective action</I> and <I>reflexive monitoring</I>&mdash;were used to do a constant comparison coding of transcripts of weekly calls between team coaches and mentors during a 9-month LC to implement team-based primary care in 13 health centres. Both the positive and negative (eg, lack of <I>coherence</I>) use of normalising mechanisms, as well as when they occurred over time, were noted. Findings suggest that normalising mechanisms are not linear, but work concurrently in real time, in a recursive fashion and in negative and positive ways. Clarity of purpose (<I>coherence</I>) became clearer as teams met regularly, and optimised team relational work and commitment to using a shared quality improvement process (<I>cognitive participation</I>). Similarly, the concurrence of <I>cognitive participation</I> and <I>collective action</I> likely refined each other. It took 3&ndash;4 months for most teams to establish sufficient <I>coherence</I> and <I>cognitive participation</I>, and to access actionable data. Nine months was not enough time for some teams to both implement and <I>reflexively monitor</I> change using data. A separate analysis indicated that prominent topics of discussion were interactions within the team, its relationship with the larger organisation, and difficulties accessing data and determining its reliability. Teams which experience sufficient positive aspects of normalising mechanisms are able to tolerate the unevenness and negative aspects of normalising change to succeed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thies, K., Angers, M., Schiessl, A., Khalid, N., Harding, K., Ward, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-11T18:12:53-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002972</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-002972</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of a learning collaborative on team-based care: qualitative analysis of coaching calls using normalisation process theory]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e002972</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e002972</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003111?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Enhancing equity and efficiency in cervical screening uptake: a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003111?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Cervical cancer screening is vital for early detection and prevention, yet uptake remains suboptimal in diverse communities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Local problem</st>
<p>Cauldwell Medical Centre reported cervical screening uptake rates of 54% (ages 25&ndash;49) and 62% (ages 50&ndash;64) by June 2022, both significantly below the national target of 80%, with a concerning 8 percentage point disparity between age groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Using quality improvement (QI) methodologies, including Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles and statistical process control charts, the team tested eight cycles of change grouped into three high-impact actions designed to improve accessibility, trust and personalisation of cervical screening services. Tests of change included culturally sensitive outreach, extended clinic hours and a self-booking system to enhance accessibility and engagement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>This QI initiative achieved a marked reduction in age-related inequalities in cervical screening uptake. By the end of the intervention period (March 2023), screening rates increased from 54% to 69% among women aged 25&ndash;49 and from 62% to 72% among women aged 50&ndash;64, narrowing the gap from 8 to 3 percentage points&mdash;a 60% reduction in disparity. By the final monitoring week, uptake further increased to 73% (ages 25&ndash;49) and 82% (ages 50&ndash;64), demonstrating how structured QI approaches can amplify the effectiveness of existing healthcare processes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This project highlights that systematically applying QI methodologies can effectively address healthcare inequalities, providing a scalable model for improving cervical screening uptake among under-represented populations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Santos, C., Roye, J., Tucker, J., Guevara, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-11T18:12:53-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003111</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003111</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Enhancing equity and efficiency in cervical screening uptake: a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003111</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003111</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003345?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of validated, context-specific patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) tools to enhance quality and patient safety in India]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003345?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) offer unique insights into patient perceptions of care. However, their implementation at the micro level with regards to patient safety remains limited. This study aimed to repurpose PREMs to co-produce validated, context-specific PREMs tools aimed at improving patient safety.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A prospective mixed method approach was used to design PREMs-based tools. This multiphase study was conducted from September 2023 to April 2024. In phase 1, a core group identified 17 key processes to devise the PREMs tools. In phase 2, focus group discussions were conducted by the multidisciplinary principal teams to finalise the standard operating procedures for each key process and prepare the respective PREMs questionnaires. Patient safety was the primary construct. Relevant stakeholders, including patients, participated in the face and content validation of each PREMs tool during phase 3. Content Validity Index (CVI) was calculated using three indices, namely, item level CVI (I-CVI), scale-level CVI (S-CVI) and content validity ratio (CVR). The reliability of the questionnaires was checked using Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20) values with pilot tests on patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>17 checklist format PREMs tools were developed. The I-CVI values for all the items in the questionnaires ranged from 0.73 to 1.00 and the CVR values ranged from 0.46 to 1.00. The S-CVI/AVG ranged from 0.89 to 1.00. These indicated strong content validity for all items and questionnaires. The reliability analysis for the 17 studies, based on the KR-20 values, ranged from 0.4324 to 0.9455. Except for &lsquo;fall prevention&rsquo;, all tools showed good internal consistency.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We offer a battery of patient safety oriented PREMs tools. Co-production of PREMs tools across an extensive range of patient care processes offers significant potential in patient safety implementation in addition to patient engagement.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph, L., Deshmukh, R., Murugesan, M., Nair, N. A., Antony, E., Ramasubramani, P., Karuppusami, R., Ravindran, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-07T23:42:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003345</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003345</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of validated, context-specific patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) tools to enhance quality and patient safety in India]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003345</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003345</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003366?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pilot study evaluating frailty-focused care for hospitalised patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003366?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Frailty is associated with morbidity and mortality among people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), yet there are no established care pathways to manage frail patients with COPD. To address this gap, we developed, implemented and assessed the feasibility of a new frailty-focused care model for patients hospitalised with exacerbations of COPD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a prospective cohort study among hospitalised patients with acute exacerbations of COPD in an academic hospital in Canada over 18 months. We developed and implemented a frailty-focused care model using the degree of frailty to guide personalised assessments, education, and care interventions during and after hospital discharge. We assessed the feasibility of using frailty-focused care in a real-world setting with prespecified targets for recruitment rate, care model completion and collection of patient-reported outcomes including symptom burden, health confidence, health status and self-management scores. Patients were followed up at 3 months after hospitalisation to reassess patient-reported outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>87 patients used the frailty-focused care model during hospitalisation, 58 consented to participate in this study and 45 (78%) completed 3-month postdischarge follow-up. 47% (n=21) were at least mildly frail at baseline, with 35% (n=20) at risk of frailty. Target recruitment of 50 patients was achieved, and all participants completed core elements of frailty-focused care, including frailty assessment, personalised education and discharge planning. Patient-reported outcomes were measured in all participants in hospital, and in 78% (n=45) patients at 3-month follow-up. 23% (n=13) of patients initially reported feeling confident to manage their health condition. This improved to 62% (n=28) at 3-month follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study provides a foundation to build innovative care models for frail individuals with COPD and shows it is feasible to use frailty-focused care in a real-world hospital setting. Future work requires strong patient engagement to better align frailty-focused care with patient-centred goals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mulpuru, S., Chin, M., Hasimja, D., Sandoz, J., Voduc, N., Pakhale, S., Inoue, J., Cassidy, J., Tessier, C., dEntremont, B., Lawson, J., Shaw, J., Laframboise, W., Benson, T., Forster, A. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-07T23:42:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003366</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003366</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pilot study evaluating frailty-focused care for hospitalised patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003366</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003366</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003389?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identifying diagnostic errors in the emergency department using trigger-based strategies]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003389?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Importance</st>
<p>Diagnostic errors represent a major patient safety concern, with the potential to significantly impact patient outcomes. To address this, various trigger-based strategies have been developed to identify diagnostic errors, aiming to enhance clinical decision-making and improve patient safety.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate the performance of three pre-established triggers (T) in the emergency department (ED) setting and assess their effectiveness in detecting diagnostic errors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Consecutive cohort, retrospective observational design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Academic ED with 80 000 annual visits.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adults and children presenting to a single ED in the USA between 1 May 2018 and 1 January 2020.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention/outcomes</st>
<p>Electronic health records (EHRs) were retrieved and categorised into trigger-positive and trigger-negative cases using the following criteria: T1&mdash;unscheduled returnvisits to the ED with admission within 7&ndash;10 days of theinitial visit; T2&mdash;care escalation from the inpatient unitto the intensive care unit (ICU) within 6, 12 or 24 hoursof ED admission; and T3&mdash;all deaths in the ED or within24 hours of ED admission, excluding palliative care. A random sample of trigger-positive cases was reviewed using the SaferDx tool to determine the presence or absence of a diagnostic error.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 5791 trigger-positive and 118262 trigger-negative cases were identified. Among trigger-positive cases, 4159 (72%) were associated with T1, 1415 (24%) with T2, and 217 (4%) with T3. A preliminary chart review of 462 trigger-positive and 251 trigger-negative cases showed most were error-negative (279 and 217, respectively). Detailed reviews found 32 diagnostic errors among 183 trigger-positive cases, yielding PPVs of 5.4% (T1), 8.9% (T2), and 6.9% (T3). No errors were found in 34 reviewed trigger-negative cases, resulting in a 100% NPV. Sepsis was the most common diagnosis among error-positive cases (n=11, 34.4%). Those with non-specific chief complaints like altered mental status or shortness of breath had higher diagnostic error risk.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion and relevance</st>
<p>While previously proposed EHR-based triggers can identify some diagnostic errors, they are insufficient for detecting all cases. To improve error detection performance, we recommend exploring data-driven strategies, such as machine learning techniques, to more effectively identify underlying contributing factors to diagnostic errors and enhance detection accuracy in the ED.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khalili, M., Enayati, M., Patel, S., Huschka, T., Cabrera, D., Parker, S. J., Pasupathy, K., Mahajan, P., Bellolio, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-06T23:18:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003389</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003389</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identifying diagnostic errors in the emergency department using trigger-based strategies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003389</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003389</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003400?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Metabolic monitoring among patients with psychotic disorders taking antipsychotics: results of a quality improvement project to address this challenging guideline-practice gap]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003400?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Metabolic adverse effects of antipsychotic medications pose significant health risks for patients with psychotic disorders. Despite clinical practice guidelines recommending regular metabolic monitoring, adherence to these recommendations remains suboptimal in psychiatric settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This quality improvement project aimed to assess the impact of an organisational paper-based metabolic monitoring form (MMF) on monitoring practices for patients with psychotic disorders receiving antipsychotic medications at an outpatient psychiatric clinic in a large Canadian city.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A pre-post intervention study was carried out to assess the impact of the MMF on annual monitoring among 75 randomly selected eligible patients. Metabolic monitoring parameters (blood pressure, weight, waist circumference and glucose and lipid profiles) were reviewed 1 year before and after the introduction of the form.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The MMF was missing from 10 charts, and despite its presence in the remainder, no improvement was observed in metabolic parameter documentation, and overall guideline adherence remained low. Fasting glucose and HbA1c measurements were most frequently ordered, while blood pressure and weight measurements remained consistently low across both periods.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The implementation of a paper-based MMF alone was insufficient to bridge the guideline-practice gap in metabolic monitoring, highlighting the need for other or concurrent strategies to achieve improvement.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al-Saati, Y., Vijayakumar, E., Khan, E., Leong, C., Hensel, J., Kuzenko, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-06T23:18:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003400</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003400</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Metabolic monitoring among patients with psychotic disorders taking antipsychotics: results of a quality improvement project to address this challenging guideline-practice gap]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003400</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003400</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002741?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Use of an electronic consultation system in an inner city general practice: a mixed-methods service evaluation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002741?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The COVID-19 pandemic propelled the uptake of electronic consultation (e-consultation) tools. Such tools promise to increase access and improve efficiency. Previous research has highlighted unintended consequences associated with e-consultation use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To explore patient and staff views, experiences and usage of an e-consultation tool in a general practice setting, 2 years after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and setting</st>
<p>A mixed-methods service evaluation of an e-consultation tool (eConsult) in an inner city general practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>E-consultations submitted between June and August 2022 (n=972) and associated electronic medical records were quantitatively analysed for the reason for query, type of response and whether it was followed by a reconsultation within 14 days. Reflexive thematic analysis on qualitative interviews with patients and staff (n=18).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>76% of e-consultations were followed by a face-to-face or telephone encounter as the primary response type. 21% of e-consultations were followed by a reconsultation for the same problem within 14 days.</p>
<p>E-consultations brought advantages for some patients in terms of access and convenience; however, other patients described a negative impact on expression, recognition of symptoms and the patient&ndash;doctor relationship. The access provided by eConsult surpassed practice capacity, leading to reports of clinician burnout. There was an incongruous view on the purpose of e-consultations among patients and staff.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Evaluation of e-consultation tools is essential to ensure staff and patient needs are met. Although some benefits of e-consultations were identified, a number of unintended consequences were reported, including negative impacts on workload, patient communication and the patient&ndash;doctor relationship.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leung, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-04T09:59:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002741</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-002741</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Use of an electronic consultation system in an inner city general practice: a mixed-methods service evaluation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e002741</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e002741</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002998?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quality improvement project to reduce length of stay for patients with urinary tract infections in an NHS hospital trust]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002998?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The bed day reduction improvement project for patients with urinary tract infections was commissioned at Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust as inpatient length of stay (LOS) has been increasing over time, with noticeable variance between conditions and treatment pathways.</p>
<p>A multidisciplinary group was formed with staff from infection control, urology and medicine. A3 thinking (a quality improvement method) was used to define the problem, analyse the data, complete root cause analysis and test change. </p>
<p>The project aimed to impact the whole hospital system; however, using quality improvement methodology, the area with the biggest potential impact was focused on which was the emergency department. This is because positive changes made at the front end cause better outcomes throughout the pathway. Change ideas included reducing urine sample errors by improving labelling, increasing the number sent off by making the sample collection process easier for staff, increasing the use of Same Day Emergency Care Unit (SDEC) to avoid unnecessary admissions by raising awareness of the pathway with doctors and designing a pathway direct from triage to SDEC.</p>
<p>A link was demonstrated, through audit, between sample errors/not sent and prolonged LOS, confirming the opportunity of reducing sample errors. White-topped urine sample errors reduced by 50% following the process change. The work done to reduce errors has led to an approximate 10 days per month bed day saving, improving patient experience, care and staff morale. There was no significant increase in urine samples sent, the urology SDEC use increased marginally and the triage pathway was implemented. The project was unable to link the individual changes to a reduction in the outcome measure of bed days.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crawford, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-04T09:59:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002998</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-002998</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quality improvement project to reduce length of stay for patients with urinary tract infections in an NHS hospital trust]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e002998</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e002998</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003328?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bridging the gap: monthly telephone calls to enhance collaboration between primary care physicians and psychiatrists]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003328?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The integration of mental health services within primary care settings is a growing priority in Canada, driven by the need to improve access and ensure comprehensive patient-centred care. This year-long pilot quality improvement (QI) project was conducted to examine the feasibility and impact of introducing monthly telephone consultations between primary care physicians (PCPs) and psychiatrists working at a secondary care regional hospital in Ontario, Canada.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>PCPs were connected with a team of psychiatrists via email on a voluntary basis. Once connected, PCPs were encouraged to contact psychiatrists by text or email to book monthly telephone consultation for patient care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of seven PCPs and five psychiatrists participated in this project. A total of 66 patients were discussed via telephone consultations between PCPs and psychiatrists and 11 of these patients were referred to psychiatry for further assessment. The number of referrals to psychiatry O-P service from the seven PCPs involved in this pilot decreased from 83 for the period of November 2021 to October 2022 to 53 for the period of this project, that is, November 2022 to October 2023.</p>
<p>There were initial challenges in scheduling consultations due to busy practices. After the first few months of regular monthly contact, three psychiatrists reported fewer ongoing contacts with PCPs and that PCPs email them on an as needed basis. Two psychiatrists continued to have ongoing 4&ndash;6 weeks contact with their assigned PCP, discussing on average 3&ndash;4 patients, after 1 year.</p>
<p>Psychiatrists found the telephone meetings productive and the PCPs were appreciative of the support provided and were willing to take over the primary care of some patients under the care of the psychiatrists, who had medical needs but no PCP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This pilot QI project confirms the feasibility and successful collaborations between PCPs and psychiatrists through monthly phone calls.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vasudev, K., Fernando, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-04T09:59:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003328</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003328</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bridging the gap: monthly telephone calls to enhance collaboration between primary care physicians and psychiatrists]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003328</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003328</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003397?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reducing incidents of violence and aggression and self-harm on a secure mental health inpatient ward for women with learning disabilities]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003397?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Healthcare professionals working in inpatient settings are often challenged by behaviours associated with learning disability, autism and other mental health needs, including high levels of violence and aggression. This was the case on Oakley Ward, an integrated medium and low secure mental health service for women with a learning disability diagnosis. To affect change, a quality improvement project was initiated to reduce incidents of violence and aggression and incidents of self-harm by 25% over a 12-month period.</p>
<p>We introduced two interventions. The first change idea was to introduce safety huddles to improve communication among staff and to enhance relationships with patients. Patients were invited to the beginning of the meeting to give their feedback and ask any questions they may have, thereby supporting coproduction and strengthening therapeutic relationships. The second change idea was a co-designed programme of activities; patients were actively involved in the selection and organisation of activities that were meaningful to them.</p>
<p>Our baseline data demonstrated high levels of incidents. By June 2024, there was a 29% reduction in the number of incidents of violence and aggression per 1000 bed days and a 25% reduction in the number of incidents of self-harm per 1000 bed days. As a balancing measure, we observed a reduction of 55% in the number of seclusion hours. Improvements were also experienced anecdotally through staff feedback.</p>
<p>The interventions led to substantial reductions in incidents. We have demonstrated the benefits of improved communication practices and meaningful engagement opportunities on quality of life and ward functionality. Both interventions could be easily replicated on other mental health and learning disability inpatient wards. The success of this initiative can be attributed to the collaborative efforts of multidisciplinary teams, strong leadership and proactive staff.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paradza, M., Zichawo, F., Georgiou, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-03T05:45:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003397</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003397</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reducing incidents of violence and aggression and self-harm on a secure mental health inpatient ward for women with learning disabilities]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003397</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003397</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003296?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Restoring antenatal health services in a war-affected hospital: a quality improvement project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003296?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Health service restoration involves reinstating all previous health service components to a facility after a period of disruption caused by war, conflict or other disasters. As defined by the WHO, antenatal care (ANC) is the care provided by skilled healthcare professionals to pregnant women and adolescent girls to ensure optimal health conditions for both mother and fetus during pregnancy. Before the restoration process, the hospital senior management team, maternal and newborn health (MNH) staff and Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) improvement advisors had discussions on how to restore ANC services. This quality improvement (QI) project aims to restore ANC service at the war-damaged hospital, Amhara region, Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The model for improvement method was applied, we collected 6 months of data retrospectively to form a baseline, 1-year data were collected during implementation and a second year&rsquo;s data to ensure sustainability of improvement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Result</st>
<p>The run chart shows the percentage of pregnant mothers who received all ANC bundle elements at their first ANC visit at Jamma Primary Hospital and improved from a baseline of 0% to 94.5%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The project involved three interventions that worked well: using the ANC first bundle checklist, conducting exit interviews with pregnant women and checking laboratory test availability every week. Additionally, through our Plan-Do-Study-Act, we understood that engaging the community in our QI project and providing psychosocial support for healthcare providers after the conflict were helpful in improving our QI project.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alene, A. A., Zegeye, D. T., Haile, Y. G., Hailemariam, N. W., Ali, I. A., Yesuf, M., Kiflie, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-31T00:16:57-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003296</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003296</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Restoring antenatal health services in a war-affected hospital: a quality improvement project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003296</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003296</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003378?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating the implementation of a longitudinal cocurricular experiential quality improvement training programme for undergraduate medical students]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003378?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Quality improvement and patient safety (QIPS) is a core competency in undergraduate medical education. While didactic and experiential learning enhance QIPS knowledge and skills, there are limited experiential opportunities. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a longitudinal didactic and experiential student-led programme, Quality Improvement Experiential Student Training (QuEST). QuEST was piloted during year 1, where learners completed online modules, didactic seminars, an experiential project and mentorship meetings with the programme&rsquo;s faculty chair (Plan-Do-Study-Act [PDSA] 1). We implemented a formal leadership structure, adapted the curriculum, and changed mentorship meetings to student-led in year 2 (PDSA 2). In response to reduced learner satisfaction, we reintroduced faculty-led mentorship meetings in year 3 as well as revised the experiential project screening process and decreased the cohort size to enhance programme operations. The outcome was self-reported confidence in completing a QIPS project, which we aimed to achieve at least 60% of learners reporting confidence each year. Fourteen learners were enrolled in year 1, 45 in year 2 and 18 in year 3. After year 1, 86% of learners reported confidence in completing a QIPS project (from 39% preprogramme; p&lt;0.01), 64% in year 2 (from 16%; p&lt;0.01) and 75% in year 3 (from 28%; p&lt;0.01). Programme satisfaction was 4.25/5 in year 1, 4.27/5 in year 2 and 4.75/5 in year 3. Strengths included experiential learning and support from the programme. Opportunities for improvement included further check-in meetings to promote accountability and project progression. The QuEST programme equipped learners with the confidence needed to complete a QIPS project. The provision of mentorship was identified as a common driver for learner satisfaction, with the suggestion to provide further structured and unstructured mentorship opportunities embedded in the programme. Future work may consider longitudinally assessing changes to learner behaviour.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bailey, K., Farahani, E., Raval, S., Lin, K. X., Nasser, M., Hersh, J., Khan, F., Chugh, S., Freeland, A., Ginzburg, A., Sharfuddin, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-31T00:16:57-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003378</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003378</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating the implementation of a longitudinal cocurricular experiential quality improvement training programme for undergraduate medical students]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003378</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003378</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003454?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Conceptualisation and design of a protocol for a novel social drivers and primary care screening tool in paediatric orthopaedics: a quality improvement initiative]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003454?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Paediatric patients with elevated healthcare needs have limited access to care, contributing to insufficient preventive services. Social drivers of health (SDOH), such as inadequate nutrition and poor community support, contribute substantially to paediatric health. In order to promote value-based healthcare, specialty providers like orthopaedic surgeons can serve as an entry point to connect patients to SDOH and primary care resources. The purpose of this short report is to provide a framework for other institutions for an ongoing screening programme.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Overview of programme</st>
<p>Informed on prior initiatives, we designed a systematic screening programme for SDOH, obesity (via body mass index (BMI)) and primary care access in a paediatric orthopaedics clinic, for English-speaking and Spanish-speaking patients &lt;18 years old. We record age, sex, race/ethnicity, language, orthopaedic condition, Area Deprivation Index and Childhood Opportunity Index from the electronic record previsit. BMI &ge;95th percentile triggers referral to a paediatric obesity management programme. An institutional SDOH screen detects financial, food, transportation, housing and utility needs. A positive screen triggers a referral to institution and state-specific resources. A five-question Primary Care Access Screen identifies gaps in primary care access. A positive screen triggers an internal referral to paediatric primary care. Patients are flagged before visits, and screening results are reviewed. Students place referrals for positive screens, finalised by providers. Follow-up occurs at 6 weeks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data collection</st>
<p>We assess screen positivity, referral uptake and completed appointments for all patients at 6 weeks.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shenoy, D. A., Radulovacki, K., Zirbes, C., Shao, R., Yanez, G., Catanzano, A. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-31T00:16:57-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003454</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003454</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Conceptualisation and design of a protocol for a novel social drivers and primary care screening tool in paediatric orthopaedics: a quality improvement initiative]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003454</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003454</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003063?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[STAMP: surgical thromboprophylaxis adherence management programme]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003063?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Venous thromboembolism is the main cause of preventable in-hospital morbidity and mortality. Despite the recommendations available in the clinical practice guideline, there is low adherence to correct thromboprophylaxis. The implementation of strategies in other countries has had a significant effect on this shortcoming. The objective of the current study was to develop and apply a multifaceted strategy to improve adherence to the institutional protocol of thromboprophylaxis in surgical patients in a university hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This was a quasi-experimental before-and-after study. Adequate adherence to the institutional thromboprophylaxis guide for surgical patients was evaluated by performing an initial measurement, then a multifaceted intervention and, finally, a second measurement. The information was collected from electronic medical records. The study population was a multidisciplinary healthcare team. <sup>2</sup> tests and Student&rsquo;s t tests were used for the analysis of categorical and numerical variables.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In total, 192 medical records were included for the two measurements. The strategy comprised the following: inclusion of the Caprini scale in the electronic system, creation and dissemination of the institutional thromboprophylaxis booklet, conducting information sessions, creating an online course and creating an alert for high-risk and very high-risk thromboembolic patients. The implementation of the strategy significantly increased adequate adherence to the institutional thromboprophylaxis guide according to the thromboembolic risk of the patient calculated by the Caprini scale (40.2% vs 62.7%, p 0.003).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The use of a multifaceted strategy to improve adherence to thromboprophylaxis in surgical patients should be considered locally and internationally.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quintana-Montejo, N., Cabrera Rivera, P. A., Rios Acuna, S. d. J., Cruz Reyes, D. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-30T00:51:23-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003063</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003063</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[STAMP: surgical thromboprophylaxis adherence management programme]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003063</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003063</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003391?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery for caesarean delivery: a quality improvement initiative]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003391?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Enhanced recovery after caesarean delivery (ERAC) is a multidisciplinary, evidence-based bundle of interventions developed from Enhanced Recovery After Surgery principles, designed to improve patient outcomes, reduce complications and save healthcare resources. Despite these benefits, the implementation of ERAC within the Canadian healthcare context is unknown. In addition, previous ERAC studies typically excluded patients undergoing unplanned caesarean deliveries (CD). The objective of our study was to evaluate the results of a quality improvement initiative that implemented a comprehensive ERAC pathway for both planned and unplanned CD in a large Canadian obstetric unit, with a specific focus on patient-reported outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A pre-implementation post implementation design was used. The primary outcomes were Obstetric Quality of Recovery Score (ObsQoR-10) and patient satisfaction at 6 weeks postpartum. Secondary outcomes included postpartum length of stay, postoperative pain and maternal infectious morbidity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>Antenatal, intraoperative and postoperative ERAC bundles were developed with multidisciplinary input.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>513 patients were included: 290 pre-implementation (149 planned CD, 141 unplanned CD) and 223 post- implementation (128 planned CD, 95 unplanned CD). Baseline demographics were similar, except the post implementation groups had significantly higher median Body Mass Index (BMI). In planned CD, ObsQoR-10 scores were on average 3.4 points higher in the post-implementation group (95% CI (&ndash;0.19 to 6.99); p-value=0.063). Patient satisfaction assessed at 6 weeks postpartum was significantly improved by 12 points in the post-implementation group (95% CI (5.58 to 18.62); p-value&lt;0.001). In unplanned CD, implementation was not associated with ObsQoR-10 (p-value=0.92) or patient satisfaction assessed at 6 weeks postpartum (p-value=0.43). Pain scores were higher in both post-implementation groups, but there were no differences in morphine milliequivalents or requirement for breakthrough opioids. Length of stay and maternal infectious morbidity were similar.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Implementation of ERAC in a large Canadian tertiary care obstetrics unit was feasible and resulted in improved recovery and increased satisfaction in patients undergoing planned CD. There were no differences in other outcomes, including infectious morbidity; however, the contribution of BMI needs to be explored. Patients undergoing unplanned CD face additional challenges related to outcomes, recovery and satisfaction and should be targeted in future studies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walker, M., Sobel, M., Siddiqi, N., Carvalho, J. C. A., Jahan, N., Santini, S., Watts, N., Dart, K., Wang, S., Huszti, E., Thomas, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-30T00:51:23-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003391</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003391</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery for caesarean delivery: a quality improvement initiative]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003391</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003391</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003376?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding physicians' views on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in lung cancer care: a qualitative approach]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003376?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly recognised as valuable tools for personalising care pathways and improving the quality of life for patients with lung cancer. PROMs capture patients&rsquo; perceptions of symptoms and functional status, while patient-reported experience measures focus on how patients perceive the care process, communication, empathy and accessibility. However, integrating PROMs into clinical practice remains challenging. This study explores physicians&rsquo; perceptions of PROMs in lung cancer care, their impact and the barriers and facilitators to their implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study seeks to understand physicians&rsquo; perspectives on the role of PROMs in enhancing the quality of life, dignity and autonomy of patients with lung cancer and to identify key barriers and facilitators to their integration into clinical practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>16 semistructured interviews were conducted with physicians treating patients with lung cancer. A hybrid thematic analysis was used to identify key themes and patterns in the data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three main themes emerged: (1) patient-related factors, such as health literacy and emotional distress; (2) the influence of social and family environments and (3) the role of PROMs in clinical decision-making. While PROMs were valued for their potential to improve care, barriers like digital literacy and socioeconomic factors hindered their application. Specifically, the study found that while physicians valued the potential of PROMs to improve patient care, several barriers, including patients&rsquo; digital literacy and socioeconomic factors, hindered their practical application.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>PROMs offer a pathway to enhance patient-centred care in lung cancer treatment. However, their successful integration requires addressing barriers such as health literacy, digital access and multidisciplinary collaboration. Future research should focus on strategies for effective PROM integration into clinical workflows and investigate methods for effectively integrating PROMs into routine clinical workflows.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garcia Abejas, A., Gomes, J. M., Andrade, M. E., Canelas, D., Sobral, M. A., Leite Costa, F., Salvador Verges, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-28T23:19:26-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003376</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003376</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding physicians' views on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in lung cancer care: a qualitative approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003376</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003376</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003346?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving long-term postoperative pain monitoring and follow-up for women undergoing incontinence mesh surgery: a quality improvement initiative]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003346?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) affects many women, often resulting from childbirth-related injuries. Synthetic mesh SUI implants, popular since the 1990s, are effective but have raised concerns due to complications like long-term pain. In Norway, insufficient follow-up and inconsistent pain registration hinder accurate prevalence estimates. This study aimed to enhance pain registration and standardise follow-ups after sling surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Local problem</st>
<p>Routine 3-year postoperative controls, recommended by the Norwegian Female Incontinence Registry (NFIR) have been deprioritised by public hospitals for financial reasons. Less than 50% of patients undergoing sling surgeries in 2017 received follow-ups, with only half including pain data. This risks underestimating pain prevalence and impedes quality improvements.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A quality improvement project (2022&ndash;2023), initiated by NFIR, included seven hospitals selected for surgical volume, location and follow-up performance. Interventions: (1) Structured 3-year telephone follow-ups with pain registration for SUI mesh surgeries between 1 April 2019 and 31 March 2020. (2) Mandatory clinical examinations for patients reporting persistent pain. (3) Improved NFIR pain monitoring to track onset and persistence. (4) Standardised patient information on postoperative pain.</p>
<p>The NFIR pain variable was refined, with main data analyses at baseline, mid-project and finalisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Follow-up rates exceeded 80%, with pain data documented for all. Persistent pain was self-reported by 4.3%. After clinical evaluations, 1.9% could be attributed to the mesh implant. Three patients (0.7%) required treatment, one needed partial mesh removal. Interdepartmental follow-up variability decreased, and NFIR pain monitoring was revised for precision.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Telephone-based follow-ups improved pain documentation and reduced departmental variability. Although pain prevalence was low, systematic follow-ups and refined monitoring remain crucial. Future efforts should explore electronic follow-ups and maintain interdepartmental collaboration, providing a model for similar healthcare challenges.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oversand, S. H., Dimoski, T., Svenningsen, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-27T17:02:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003346</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003346</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving long-term postoperative pain monitoring and follow-up for women undergoing incontinence mesh surgery: a quality improvement initiative]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003346</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003346</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002840?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Leveraging a multifaceted digital medication refill system on improving patients medication adherence and reducing medication oversupply among elderly patients with hypertension]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002840?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted healthcare, causing challenges in managing chronic diseases like hypertension. Al-Hada Armed Forces Hospital&rsquo;s Pharmaceutical Care Department aims to provide safe, efficient, and effective medication refills for elderly patients pre-and post the pandemic. An improvement project was conducted at Al-Hada Armed Forces tertiary hospital to enhance medication refill processes and adherence among elderly patients with hypertension. Data on medication adherence, including refill cycle times and factors contributing to longer cycles, were collected through the Hospital Information System. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement Model for Improvement guided a study to implement a digital medication refill system. Pre-intervention and post-intervention analyses demonstrated the effectiveness of the digital system in improving medication refill processes for elderly patients with hypertension. We improved the medication refill process, reducing wait times from 40 to 5 minutes by 2022. Our system monitored medication adherence and oversupply, and it also utilized features like delivery services, online medication refills, the Tebtom system and SMS reminders. Tebtom system is an Arabic term that means &lsquo;get well soon&rsquo; in English. The system includes a variety of services, such as obtaining a waiting number for upcoming appointments within 30 minutes, booking appointments, accessing medical reports, laboratory results, radiology requests, and refilling medications. The study showed a significant improvement in refill duration. Medication adherence increased from 35% to 79% with timely reminders, fewer missed doses and increased coverage of medication days. Patient medication oversupply decreased from 50% to 19%, and the system improved communication and refill convenience. A successful quality improvement method has significantly impacted our medication refill system, the effectiveness of message reminders, and patient safety through ensuring compliance with medications and reducing oversupply. During COVID-19, the digital system played a crucial role in maintaining medication access. This project highlights the positive impact of a digital refill system on efficiency and reducing medication oversupply among elderly patients with hypertension before and after the pandemic.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[AL Mubarak, B., Elmasry, L. N., Qoronfulah, M., AlOtaibi, B., Abid, M. H., AlOsaimy, D., Hawsawi, A., AlShehri, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-23T22:06:25-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002840</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-002840</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Leveraging a multifaceted digital medication refill system on improving patients medication adherence and reducing medication oversupply among elderly patients with hypertension]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement programme</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e002840</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e002840</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003288?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reducing unplanned medical intensive care unit admissions by the critical care outreach team: a quality improvement report]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003288?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Unplanned admissions to the intensive care unit (ICU) are frequently associated with an increased risk of hospital mortality, greater severity of illness and extended hospital stay. A leading cause of unplanned ICU admission is delayed recognition of a deteriorating patient. The aim of the project was to reduce the rate of unplanned medical ICU admissions by implementing an active surveillance programme through proactive rounding.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xiong, J., Hui, S., That, K. Z., Ng, S., Mansor, M., Ho, C., Ng, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-18T01:35:54-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003288</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003288</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reducing unplanned medical intensive care unit admissions by the critical care outreach team: a quality improvement report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003288</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003288</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002919?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quality improvement project to routinely identify sensory and eating challenges in childhood neurodevelopmental movement disorders]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002919?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Sensory, eating and mealtime (SEM) challenges are common among young people with neurodevelopmental movement disorders but are rarely assessed during initial clinical consultations. This quality improvement project aimed to evaluate the impact of routine SEM screening on identifying these challenges and improving documentation and follow-up in a specialist paediatric movement disorder clinic in England. Using the SHIFT-Evidence Framework and a Plan-Do-Study-Act approach, the project implemented and evaluated a series of interventions. In the <b>&lsquo;PLAN&rsquo;</b> phase, clinicians participated in a workshop to raise awareness of SEM challenges and inform the development of screening questions to support routine SEM assessment. The <b>&lsquo;DO&rsquo;</b> phase involved implementing routine SEM screening during a 3 month trial, supported by active measures such as project champions, weekly reminders and team discussions to encourage sustained practice. The <b>&lsquo;STUDY&rsquo;</b> phase included analysis of assessment outcome letters from three time points (baseline, trial and outcome retention phases) to evaluate changes in documentation and the sustainability of improvements. In the <b>&lsquo;ACT&rsquo;</b> phase, findings were shared with the team, resulting in improved signposting, targeted recommendations and ongoing collaborations with feeding clinics. Findings demonstrated increased documentation of SEM challenges in assessment letters, with mentions rising from 33% at baseline to 71.9% during the trial and 64.3% in the retention phase. However, actionable recommendations and interventions remained limited during the trial but showed improvement in the retention phase, where letters included more tailored guidance and specific advice for SEM challenges. This project highlights the prevalence of SEM challenges among young people with neurodevelopmental movement disorders and underscores the importance of routine SEM screening. Developing standardised assessment tools and protocols could further aid clinicians in identifying and addressing these challenges during initial assessments.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bamigbade, S.-E., Sopena, S., Hedderly, T., Malik, O., Owen, T., Ludlow, A. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-17T01:41:58-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002919</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-002919</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quality improvement project to routinely identify sensory and eating challenges in childhood neurodevelopmental movement disorders]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e002919</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e002919</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003097?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Implementation of home blood pressure monitoring in preoperative anaesthesia assessment clinic]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003097?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Elevated preoperative blood pressure (BP) is a common problem and often results in late surgery cancellation and wastage of theatre resources. High BP readings in the preoperative anaesthetic assessment clinic (PAAC) could be the result of the white coat effect (WCE) and may not reflect patients&rsquo; baseline BP. A preliminary audit conducted in our hospital revealed a significant number of unnecessary referrals to the general practitioners (GPs) and the emergency department (ED) based on high BP readings in PAAC alone.</p>
<p>This study aimed to determine the prevalence of WCE in elective surgical patients and develop a workflow to reduce unnecessary referrals and case cancellations.</p>
<p>A multidisciplinary team established a new hypertension workflow by introducing home BP monitoring and involving internal medicine specialists in perioperative care. 214 patients with clinic BP higher than 160/90 mm Hg in PAAC were recruited. They were instructed to check their home BP twice a day with a machine on loan from PAAC and seek medical assistance if their home BP exceeded 160/90 mm Hg. WCE was diagnosed when the discrepancy between the average clinic BP and home BP exceeded 20/10 mm Hg.</p>
<p>WCE was observed in 92.1% of patients (162/176, 95% CI 87.0 to 95.6) and 57.4% of those with WCE (57.4%, 95% CI 49.7 to 64.8) had normal home BP measurement. None of the patients had surgery cancelled due to high BP readings on the day of the operation, and the number of unnecessary GP/ED referrals was significantly reduced after implementation of the new workflow.</p>
<p>The comprehensive perioperative workflow using home BP monitoring offers an effective and feasible method to detect WCE. This approach has saved healthcare resources and improved patient satisfaction.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, X., Neo, S., Gobindram, A., Koh, X. H., Kiew, A. S. C., Ong, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-17T01:41:58-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003097</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003097</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Implementation of home blood pressure monitoring in preoperative anaesthesia assessment clinic]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003097</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003097</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003234?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Using Quality Improvement to improve serious incident reporting in the English NHS]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003234?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Timely completion of serious incident reports is crucial for patient safety and regulatory compliance. Delays hinder organisational learning and compromise patient outcomes. Between May 2021 and April 2022, East London NHS Foundation Trust (ELFT), a provider of mental health, community health and primary care services to approximately 1.8 million people across London and Bedfordshire, faced a significant backlog of serious incident reports. Completion times averaged 208 days&mdash;well beyond the 60-day target set by NHS England at the time.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A quality improvement (QI) initiative employing structured methodologies, including the ELFT Sequence of Improvement, statistical process control, Ishikawa analysis, a driver diagram and plan-do-study-act cycles to diagnose and address process inefficiencies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Three main change ideas were tested and implemented: concise reporting templates to streamline documentation, a caseload tracker for real-time monitoring and team escalation meetings to improve communication and accountability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>These interventions led to a 65% reduction in average completion time, decreasing from 208 days to 74 days. Additionally, staff collaboration and workflow efficiency improved, fostering a culture of continuous improvement, continuous learning and accountability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This project demonstrates the effectiveness of structured QI methodologies in improving serious incident reporting. The implemented changes are sustainable and provide a scalable model for other healthcare organisations aiming to enhance patient safety and compliance. Future work will focus on embedding these improvements into routine practice and exploring their impact on broader organisational learning.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Santos, C., Ajayi-Obe, A., Aurelio, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-16T00:34:57-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003234</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003234</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Using Quality Improvement to improve serious incident reporting in the English NHS]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003234</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003234</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003249?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Anaesthesiologists Non-Technical Skills in Denmark Form: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of Turkish version in paediatric surgery team]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003249?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The Anaesthesiologists&rsquo; Non-Technical Skills in Denmark Form (ANTSdk) is a widely accepted, practical, and comprehensive measurement tool used by anaesthesiologists and other healthcare professionals. This study aims to adapt the ANTSdk into Turkish as a valid and reliable assessment instrument. By doing so, it will contribute to establishing a common language and standardised terminology for integrating non-technical skills into the Turkish healthcare system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a standardised cross-cultural adaptation process. The psychometric properties of the Turkish-adapted version of the ANTSdk were evaluated through observations of 81 real paediatric surgical operating room teams, assessed simultaneously by two independent observers. Validity was examined using content validity analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency and inter-rater reliability of the Turkish version of ANTSdk (ANTStr) were also assessed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The specified factorial model retained the same grouping of elements into four domains as in the original version of ANTSdk. All standardised factor loadings were greater than 0.3. The inter-rater reliability, measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient of the global score, was 0.98. The Cronbach&rsquo;s alpha coefficient for the scores provided by the first rater ranged from 0.83 to 0.94, while for the second rater, it ranged from 0.84 to 0.94. The generalisability coefficient calculated for ANTStr was exceptionally high at 0.96.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The Turkish version of ANTSdk demonstrates strong psychometric properties for evaluating paediatric surgical team performance in the operating room. This translated instrument can be used to assess non-technical skills in paediatric surgical teams within real clinical settings, facilitating benchmarking and international collaboration.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Celik, N., Sarmasoglu Kilikcier, S., Tasdelen Teker, G., Keskin, G., Ak&#x0131;n, M., Ozmert, S., Elcin, M., Senel, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-13T19:22:25-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003249</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003249</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Anaesthesiologists Non-Technical Skills in Denmark Form: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of Turkish version in paediatric surgery team]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003249</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003249</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003282?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Delphi analysis of how the practice team should organise event analysis in primary care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003282?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Significant event analysis is a common quality improvement activity in UK general practice (GP). How well do general practice (GP) teams conduct their analyses? There is little guidance and no measuring tool. This is a Delphi analysis among Scottish multidisciplinary primary care team members to establish a set of quality indicators by which practices can self-assess their practice processes in conducting their event analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A Delphi method specifically for identifying quality indicators in healthcare was used. Purposeful selection was of primary care team members with known experience of significant event analysis; informed participants. After setting a consensus score, 29 items for the first round Delphi survey, drawn from the literature, were sent out with the ability to comment on each. The second Delphi round contained those items which had passed the consensus score, the aggregated comments on those items and any suggestions for new items.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 24 informed participants approached, 10 (37.5%) agreed to undertake the full cycle of the Delphi process. 17 items from the first Delphi survey passed the consensus score with one additional item suggested. With the amalgamation of items, 16 statements were presented in the second Delphi, of which 15 passed the consensus score.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Learnings from our Delphi are that practitioners prefer the term &lsquo;learning event analysis&rsquo; to &lsquo;significant event analysis&rsquo;, and that practice nurses may need specific encouragement to become more involved in event analysis. There is reluctance to involve patients or patient representatives in the event analysis itself. Engagement in well-conducted event analysis strengthens the whole practice team.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hanley, K., McNab, D., Bowie, P., Pellowe, A., Rainey, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-13T19:22:25-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003282</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003282</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Delphi analysis of how the practice team should organise event analysis in primary care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality education report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003282</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003282</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002981?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Unveiling team needs: a qualitative study of simulation training for endovascular cerebral thrombectomy]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e002981?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Effective multidisciplinary teamwork is crucial for successful endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) treatment, a critical stroke intervention classified as a non-operating room anaesthesia (NORA) procedure. Our hospital incorporated EVT training into regular stroke simulation training. This study aimed to investigate team members&rsquo; experiences of simulation training in preparation for clinical EVT, including how the training and related clinical procedures could be improved to address their identified needs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Six focus group interviews (one anaesthesia-only professional, five mixed healthcare professionals) were conducted with a purposeful sample of EVT team members. The data were analysed using inductive qualitative content analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>EVT team members considered simulation training an essential introduction to the clinical procedure, particularly for familiarisation with the angio suite, equipment, team roles and communication. However, they reported that the simulation did not prepare them for challenges inherent to NORA procedures encountered during clinical EVT. These included managing multidisciplinary task interactions, maintaining haemodynamic and respiratory stability, and working within spatial and access constraints. Consequently, the experience of disorganised teamwork persisted in clinical EVT. The team members reported a lack of shared understanding of roles, responsibilities and communication expectations, particularly between anaesthesia professionals and other team members. This contributed to unfamiliarity with team dynamics and workflow. The clinical EVT team leader inconsistently facilitated collaboration, impacting team communication and effectiveness. The participants proposed modifications to the simulation training and clinical procedure to address these issues.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our study highlights the need to incorporate the multidisciplinary challenges of NORA procedures into EVT simulation training, emphasising active input from all professional groups involved in the EVT team, particularly anaesthesia. Practical recommendations for planning and implementing such simulation training are proposed.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fugelli, C. G., Hansen, B. S., Ersdal, H., Kurz, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-07T17:04:23-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002981</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-002981</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Unveiling team needs: a qualitative study of simulation training for endovascular cerebral thrombectomy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e002981</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e002981</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003223?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving the rates of inpatient HbA1c assessment and medication deintensification in people with diabetes and frailty]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003223?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Intensive glucose management in people with diabetes and frailty presents significant risk which outweighs potential benefit. Hospital admission presents an opportunity for interventions that may reduce the impact of overtreatment in people with diabetes and frailty. Our previous study has shown low rates of glycated haemoglobin(HbA<SUB>1c</SUB>) assessment and inpatient medication deintensification in people with diabetes and frailty.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a three-intervention quality improvement programme and studied the effectiveness of the interventions aiming to improve the inpatient HbA<SUB>1c</SUB> assessment and management of inpatients with diabetes and frailty. A baseline assessment was conducted prior to cycles 1 and 2, with another audit conducted post-cycles 1 and 2. A further audit was then carried out with another audit post-cycle 3.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Interventions 1 and 2 involved publishing an infographic to aid assessment and medication deintensification in patients with diabetes and frailty, followed by spreading awareness among resident doctors of the baseline audit results and the infographic via email and WhatsApp groups. Intervention 3 involved allocating &lsquo;Diafrailty Champion&rsquo; the medical wards to help improve the assessment and management of patients with diabetes and frailty.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 291 patients with diabetes and moderate&ndash;severe frailty were included in our audits (96 patients in baseline audit, 102 post-cycles 1 and 2 audit, 92 post-cycle 3 &lsquo;Diafrailty Champion&rsquo; audit). Improvements were observed for the rates of HbA<SUB>1c</SUB> assessment and deintensification in the post-interventions 1 and 2 audit, and these persisted following the introduction of &lsquo;Diafrailty Champion&rsquo;.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Interventions that included raising awareness of the inpatient assessment and management of people with diabetes and frailty were successful in improving inpatient HbA<SUB>1c</SUB> assessment and deintensification rates. The improved HbA<SUB>1c</SUB> assessment and deintensification rates persist following the engagement of a resident doctor &lsquo;Diafrailty Champion&rsquo;.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kareem, A., Lwin, H., Fazil, M., Thomas, A., Thottungal, K., Gupta, G., Gera, K., Malik, J., Lynn, H., Umasankar, V., Tun, H., Naing, A. M., Saeed, S., Davitadze, M., Melson, E., Gallagher, A., Higgins, K., iREFINE Team]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-07T17:04:23-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003223</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003223</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving the rates of inpatient HbA1c assessment and medication deintensification in people with diabetes and frailty]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003223</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003223</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003256?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Implementation of a multicomponent intervention including clinical decision support (CDS), e-course and feedback to improve general practitioners radiology referrals: a feasibility study and study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003256?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Overuse of high-cost imaging like MRI and CT scans is a growing concern, with 4&ndash;100% of examinations deemed of low value. This contributes to unnecessary healthcare costs and patient risks such as overdiagnosis. Norwegian general practitioners (GPs) demonstrate variable referral practices, with many referrals being inconsistent with guidelines. The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and usability of &lsquo;VeRaVest,&rsquo; a multicomponent intervention targeting improved radiology referral practices among GPs in Western Norway.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The intervention combined three elements: (1) referral guidelines integrated into electronic systems, (2) group-based courses on guideline compliance using quality improvement principles and (3) a web-based feedback system. The study was conducted with 139 GPs recruited in two cohorts in 2023, evaluated using a step-wedge design. Data sources included qualitative feedback from GPs and quantitative measures like referral completion rates. Participants&rsquo; referral data were anonymised and analysed using a PACS/RIS (Pictures Archive and Communications System/Radiology Information System) system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Preliminary results indicate high GP satisfaction with the intervention. About 76% of participants reported changes in referral practices, including improved indication assessments, better referral descriptions and enhanced patient communication. GPs emphasised the importance of accessible guidelines, peer-based learning and actionable feedback. Integration of decision support tools and guideline-based training was pivotal in aligning practices with national standards.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The multicomponent VeRaVest intervention demonstrated feasibility and potential to reduce low-value imaging practices. Success hinged on embedding guidelines into workflows, fostering peer engagement and ensuring practical relevance. Future evaluations will focus on quantitative outcomes, including referral rates and quality. Findings suggest scalability to other healthcare settings and regions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aslaksen, A. B., Mowinckel-Nilsen, M. L. H., Hjo&#x0308;rleifsson, S., Oyane, N. M. F., Sharma, S. P., Vang, E., Hartveit, M., Harthug, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-07T17:04:23-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003256</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003256</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Implementation of a multicomponent intervention including clinical decision support (CDS), e-course and feedback to improve general practitioners radiology referrals: a feasibility study and study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003256</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003256</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003313?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Supported implementation of tailored multicomponent fall prevention interventions in hospital: a feasibility study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003313?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Falls in hospital remain a complex patient safety issue for health systems. Multicomponent fall prevention interventions can reduce patient falls in hospitals; however, the implementation of these approaches in routine practice can be challenging and inconsistent. Quality improvement (QI) education and clinical facilitation may support the implementation of hospital fall prevention interventions. We conducted a mixed-method implementation feasibility study with a primary aim of evaluating the acceptability of QI education and clinical facilitation to support implementation of tailored, multicomponent fall prevention interventions. Secondary aims were to describe preliminary implementation impacts, and barriers and facilitators to the intervention and its implementation, to inform study feasibility.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Acute hospital wards (n=4) established a local team (2&ndash;4 staff members) to lead the implementation of multicomponent fall prevention interventions, informed by local incident data, on their ward. Education about QI (online or face-to-face) and clinical facilitation (12 weeks of weekly onsite support from a nurse manager experienced in QI) was provided to support the teams. Ward staff were invited to complete preimplementation and postimplementation surveys and postimplementation interviews. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse quantitative data. Qualitative data were analysed using inductive and deductive content analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Acceptability: staff satisfaction with the strategies used to support the implementation of local fall prevention interventions had a mean score of 7.4/10 (SD=1.9, n=38). Reach: 28/38 (74%) survey respondents were aware of the multicomponent fall prevention interventions on their ward, with 24 (86%) reporting a positive impact on clinical practice post implementation. Adoption: delivery of multicomponent hospital fall prevention interventions increased 1.1/10 points between preimplementation (n=61) postimplementation (n=38) surveys. Survey (n=99) and interview (n=12) data indicated barriers and facilitators relevant to the intervention, implementation strategies, recipients and context. Examples of barriers included lack of accountability, competing priorities and staffing challenges. Examples of facilitators included local integration, empowered decision-making and dependable leadership.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>QI education and clinical facilitation appeared to be acceptable and feasible strategies to support the implementation of tailored hospital fall prevention interventions. The impact of these implementation strategies when adapted to address local barriers and support enablers warrants further evaluation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McLennan, C., Sherrington, C., Naganathan, V., Tilden, W., Richards, B., McVeigh, T., Hallahan, A., Nayak, V., Jennings, M., Hassett, L., Haynes, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-07T17:04:23-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003313</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003313</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Supported implementation of tailored multicomponent fall prevention interventions in hospital: a feasibility study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003313</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003313</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003318?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Perception of 'patient safety culture among healthcare professionals in the field of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and CAR-T therapy: a multicentre cross-sectional observational study by Italian Transplant Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation, Haematopoietic Stem Cells and Cell Therapy (GITMO)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003318?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Adverse events associated with healthcare services in hospitalised patients represent a growing burden, generating significant costs for individuals, healthcare facilities and society. Their clinical and economic impact is particularly critical in the context of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T therapy. A positive safety culture is widely recognised as a crucial factor in reducing hospital errors. This study aimed to evaluate the perception of &lsquo;Patient Safety Culture&rsquo; (PSC) among professionals working in the HSCT and CAR-T therapy fields.</p>
<p>A multicentre, cross-sectional observational study was conducted by GITMO. The sample included healthcare professionals (physicians, nurses and others) who had been part of the Transplant Programme for at least 2 years. To assess PSC perception, the validated Italian version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety (SOPS V.2.0) from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality was used.</p>
<p>The survey was completed by 166 professionals from 47 centres (54% participation rate). Binary logistic regression showed that haematologists reported higher PSC perceptions compared with nurses with positive responses exceeding 75%, particularly in dimensions such as &lsquo;Teamwork&rsquo; (nurse OR=0.306, p=0.009), &lsquo;Organizational Learning&mdash;Continuous Improvement&rsquo; (nurse OR=0.332, p=0.011), &lsquo;Response to Error&rsquo; (nurse OR=0.360, p=0.024), &lsquo;Supervisor Support&rsquo; (nurse OR=0.160, p&lt;0.001), &lsquo;Communication About Error&rsquo; (nurse OR=0.152, p=0.001) and &lsquo;Global Instrument&rsquo; (nurse OR=0.150, p&lt;0.001).</p>
<p>The findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to address discrepancies in PSC perceptions across professional roles, age groups and regions. Enhancing staffing levels and promoting the use of incident reporting systems are critical strategies to strengthen safety culture in HSCT and CAR-T therapy settings.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cioce, M., Vetrugno, G., Iula, A., Cornacchione, P., Botti, S., Zoboli, V., Cerretti, R., Soave, S., Guidi, B., Gobbi, G., Finotto, S., Bettini, D., Mordini, N., Dutto, E., Mele, A., Sperti, G., Congedo, R., De Cecco, V., Picardi, A., Buonanno, D., Carella, A. M., Steduto, M., Lupo-Stanghellini, M. T., Carmagnola, A., Faraci, M., Deiana, M., Visintini, C., Cimminiello, M., Lerose, E., Sica, S., Lamberti, F., Grassi, V. M., Di Donato, M., Nuzzo, C., Martino, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-07T17:04:23-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003318</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003318</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Perception of 'patient safety culture among healthcare professionals in the field of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and CAR-T therapy: a multicentre cross-sectional observational study by Italian Transplant Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation, Haematopoietic Stem Cells and Cell Therapy (GITMO)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003318</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003318</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003023?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Applications of human factors approaches and methods to the development of teleconsultations in primary care: a systematic scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003023?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Given the level of encouragement seen in recent policy, it is important to understand how teleconsultation technologies are designed, implemented and used in primary care settings to further encourage their use. Despite being an area of research warranting interest from the area of human factors, knowledge of the discipline&rsquo;s application is scarce. This systematic scoping review aimed to identify human factors approaches and methods previously applied to the development of teleconsultation technologies in primary care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Ergonomics Abstracts and Engineering Village were searched for peer-reviewed articles. Included studies were published 2010 onwards, focused on the development of teleconsultation technologies in primary care and adopted an approach or method fitting within the domain of human factors. Key findings underwent a content analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>70 studies were identified, most published 2019 onwards. The review identified 20 human factors approaches, the majority of which were applied to evaluate the use of teleconsultations, with less focus on the design and implementation stages. A variety of data collection methods, theories, models and frameworks were found. Although the focus of all studies fits within the domain of human factors, none of the included studies referred to &lsquo;human factors&rsquo; explicitly.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The findings illustrate approaches that have been applied when designing, implementing and evaluating the use of teleconsultations. Although the studies may not have intended to adopt a human factors lens, the approaches used relate to the wider discipline. Further analysis of the studies evaluating use could provide insight into how these technologies are being used and the factors influencing use.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferguson, A., Newham, R., Dunlop, E., Preston, K., Bennie, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-05T05:17:05-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003023</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003023</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Applications of human factors approaches and methods to the development of teleconsultations in primary care: a systematic scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003023</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003023</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003119?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trigger tools in healthcare settings: insights from an umbrella review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003119?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study synthesises the effectiveness and applicability of trigger tools for detecting adverse events (AEs) across various healthcare settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This study used an umbrella review to consolidate findings from existing systematic reviews, assess the quality of evidence and identify gaps in current knowledge.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A comprehensive search was conducted across SCOPUS, Web of Science and PubMed, and included systematic reviews and meta-analyses from 2009 to 2024 focusing on trigger tools used in healthcare settings. Data extraction and quality appraisal followed Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Narrative synthesis was employed owing to the heterogeneity among studies. Nine systematic reviews were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Nine systematic reviews were analysed. Results showed substantial variation in trigger tool performance. Detection rates ranged from 0.8% to 66% across healthcare settings and populations. Preventability rates varied widely from 7% to 94.4%. Automated detection methods demonstrated inconsistent results with AE prevalence, ranging from 0.1% to 29.2%. The studies within the reviews exhibited significant variability in the types of trigger tools analysed and the methodologies used, affecting detection outcomes. The quality of the included studies varied, with inconsistent definitions of AEs and differences in study design limiting the generalisability of the findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Trigger tools vary significantly in effectiveness, influenced by healthcare context and tool design. Automated methods need refinement. Standardised methodologies and context-specific tools are essential to improve patient safety. Future research should focus on these areas to enhance the accuracy and applicability of trigger tools in different healthcare settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024581456.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[As'ad, M., Faran, N., Al Omari, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-05T05:17:05-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003119</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003119</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trigger tools in healthcare settings: insights from an umbrella review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003119</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003119</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003254?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Regional differences in experiences of patients with metastatic breast cancer in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland: a comparative analysis (CTRIAL-IE 23-05)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003254?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) presents significant psychological, social and financial challenges. Differences in the healthcare systems of the Republic of Ireland (ROI) and Northern Ireland (NI) may impact patient care experiences. This study aimed to explore regional differences in the experiences of patients with MBC between ROI and NI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A patient-developed cross-sectional survey titled &lsquo;Patient-led Metastatic Breast Cancer Survey&rsquo; was administered online to patients with MBC in ROI and NI from July to October 2023. The survey included 76 questions addressing demographics, understanding of diagnosis, mental health, financial burden, time spent managing cancer care (time toxicity), palliative care, sexual health, exercise and access to information. These topics were selected by patients with MBC as being most impactful. Responses from 246 patients (196 ROI, 50 NI) were analysed using descriptive and comparative statistics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Psychological distress was highly prevalent in both regions; however, NI patients were more likely to receive medications for psychological distress (51% NI vs 23.7% ROI, p=0.0008). Financial strain was more pronounced in ROI, with 77.5% feeling they had no control over their medical care spending, compared with 56% of NI patients (p=0.0124). Time toxicity was also higher in ROI, where patients reported more frequent visits to oncology day wards and acute oncology service units (p=0.0012) and spent more time in these settings (p=0.038). Participation in exercise programmes was significantly higher in NI compared with ROI (p&lt;0.0001). Additionally, palliative care referrals were more commonly accepted or considered in NI than in ROI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study, the first of its kind, highlights important disparities observed in this cohort of patients with MBC across ROI and NI. Bidirectional learning could enhance patient care experiences, with NI potentially focusing on psycho-oncology integration and ROI expanding strategies to reduce time toxicity and financial burden for patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Flynn, C. R., McBrien, A., Gaynor, S., OMeara, Y., Mulvaney, E., Keogh, R. J., Weadick, C. S., Duane, F., Greally, H., OLeary, M. J., Teiserskyte, I., Beristain, I., Marron, J., Mulroe, E., Donachie, V., McLoughlin, S., OReilly, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-01T18:30:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003254</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2024-003254</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Regional differences in experiences of patients with metastatic breast cancer in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland: a comparative analysis (CTRIAL-IE 23-05)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003254</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003254</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003390?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Timely identification of deteriorating patients from acute respiratory infections at the primary care level in the COVID-19 era: quality improvement collaborative]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/3/e003390?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Primary care has been essential in ensuring the continuity of health services for patients with COVID-19 and other conditions. We aimed to increase the adoption of evidence-based interventions to identify clinical deterioration in adult patients with confirmed or suspected respiratory COVID-19 at the primary care level.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We implemented specific interventions in nine Primary Healthcare Centres (PHCC) through a quality improvement collaborative (QIC) with an interrupted time-series design. Interventions included triage for acute respiratory symptoms, the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) scale, portable oximeters for selected patients and the provincial telehealth system. Additional components involved leadership commitment, teamwork tools, reminders, audits, feedback and direct observation. A mixed-method evaluation was conducted, with two learning sessions and three action periods to test and implement selected change ideas.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Six PHHCs completed the study. Over 48 weeks, data from 877 patients were gathered, 356 in the baseline period (BP) and 477 in the implementation period (IP). Eight hundred and sixty-two medical consultations were reported, 367 for BP and 495 for IP. More COVID-19-confirmed diagnoses were observed in the IP group (1.9% vs 15%, p&lt;0.001).</p>
<p>The bundle was implemented in 0% and 28.4% of patients in the BP and IP groups, respectively. On evaluating the individual components of the bundle, we discovered enhancements in the utilisation of triage, application of NEWS2 and utilisation of oximeters when appropriate. A decrease in the number of follow-up calls was observed at the end of the implementation.</p>
<p>Patients rated the quality of care as positive in 66% of the cases in the BP and 76% in the IP group (p=0.023).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>We successfully implemented a triage algorithm based on the NEWS2 score to identify respiratory deterioration in adult patients in primary care through a QIC. This intervention was perceived as an improvement in the quality of care by the patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jorro Baron, F., Falaschi, A., Bosio, L., Gibbons, L., Vitar, E., Guglielmino, M., Negri, E., Peralta-Roca, M. B., Rodriguez, A. P., Suarez-Anzorena, I., Alonso, J. P., Rodriguez, V., Roberti, J., Garcia Elorrio, E., ICARO Study Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-01T18:30:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003390</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-003390</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, COVID-19]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Timely identification of deteriorating patients from acute respiratory infections at the primary care level in the COVID-19 era: quality improvement collaborative]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e003390</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e003390</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A177?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[237 Barriers and facilitators in implementing a new safety climate tool]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A177?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Patient safety has improved significantly over the past 20 years, but better is not good enough. Surgical complication rates declined mainly due to technological advancements. A national report has shown that the incidence of avoidable patient harm has not declined over the past years, despite increasing technical advancements and decreasing incidences of complications in the field of surgery.<sup>1</sup> However, human factors also have a significant impact on &lsquo;safety culture&rsquo; and therefore, patient outcomes. Safety culture is often defined as &lsquo;<I>the product of individual and group values, attitudes, perceptions, competencies, and patterns of behavior that determine the commitment to, and the style and proficiency of an organization&rsquo;s Health and Safety management</I>&rsquo;.<sup>2</sup> Multiple studies indicate how safety culture affects complications, medication administration errors, and length of stay, as well as staff turnover and job satisfaction among healthcare professionals.<sup>3,4,5,6,7,8</sup> Staff turnover and job satisfaction are increasingly important themes in times of overstretched healthcare systems, high turnover rates and staffing shortages. However, there is no golden standard in Dutch healthcare for measuring and improving safety culture.</p><p>The need for a quick-to-use, adaptive tool was voiced by the Dutch Surgical Society. To address this need, our research group developed the Safety Climate Thermometer tool.<sup>9</sup> This communication tool can provide surgical teams with guidance in improving the safety culture, while also allowing adaptability. This study aimed to present perceived barriers and facilitators in implementation of our tool, and to evaluate acceptability, practicality, demand, implementation and adaptation.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>  <unl>Context:</unl> Implementation of the Safety Climate Thermometer tool was piloted in three surgical teams (1x operating theatre, 2x surgical ward). Team composition and size ranged, as did the hospital setting (1x large referral/teaching hospital, 1x medium-size local hospital, 1x small local hospital), all in the Netherlands. Data collection took place between November 2021 and October 2023.</p><p>  <unl>Process:</unl> Using the Safety Climate Thermometer tool included the following phases: preparation (connecting with local teams, exploring needs, defining the team), phase I (anonymous input through the Safety Climate Thermometer tool), phase II (interdisciplinary team discussion and improvement initiative), and evaluation (interviews).<sup>9</sup> In phase I, each team scores their local safety climate on themes like wellbeing, leadership, incident reporting and teamwork. Response rates were 60, 29 and 65%. In phase II, each team was presented their climate scores, and - through interdisciplinary discussion - formulated an intended improvement for the upcoming half year. During this period, the team kept track of their goals and improvements in interdisciplinary team meetings. After this period, all participants were interviewed individually to gather more information on their feelings concerning the goal achievement and if they had felt the use of the communication tool the Safety Climate Thermometer had helped them improve communication/collaboration in their team.</p><p>  <unl>Data collection:</unl> Implementation outcome measures were adapted from Bowen <I>et al</I>. and include: acceptability, practicality, demand, implementation and adaptation.<sup>10</sup> Research methods included focus groups (observations, minutes, joint reflections by the research team) and semi-structured in-depth interviews with questions on implementation outcomes acceptability, practicality, demand, implementation and adaptation. Interviews were conducted in Dutch, lasted 25 minutes on average and were either live and audio recorded or virtual and video recorded with Microsoft Teams software.</p><p>  <unl>Data analysis:</unl> All interviews were recorded and transcribed in Dutch using Trint online transcription software.<sup>11</sup> A thematic analysis was performed and findings were summarized per implementation outcome.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Using the Safety Climate Thermometer, surgical teams initiated an interdisciplinary team meeting about safety and set actionable goals using input from the thermometer.</p><p>  <unl>Barriers and facilitators</unl>  </p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>The most important factor in implementation was time. Planning issues were common in all three teams. Getting physicians, nurses and other professionals &lsquo;at the table&rsquo; for an interdisciplinary team discussion can be challenging due to the ad hoc nature of the healthcare profession. Despite these difficulties, the average duration of phase II was only 7 months (proposed timeline was 6 months). </p></li><li><p>Having existing periodic, interdisciplinary meetings about team functioning already in place, makes achieving improvement goals easier by bypassing some of these planning hurdles. With team meetings structurally in place, no additional time needs to be spent on scheduling meetings periodically.</p></li><li><p>Each team should have at least one &lsquo;driving force&rsquo; that is intrinsically motivated to coach the team. We have encountered that any participating professional, like manager, team leader or healthcare professional, can take up this role. Without this driving force, implementation without external support would not stand a chance.</p></li><li><p>Other hurdles encountered included &lsquo;finger-pointing&rsquo; towards management, keeping the entire team informed, engaged, and motivated, and teams lacking cohesion to begin with (leading to &lsquo;us and they&rsquo;).</p></li><li><p>An important facilitator was renumeration support. We observed that especially for nurses, it is essential that the time they invest in initiatives to improve safety can be scheduled within their regular working hours or recorded as overtime. To them, it demonstrates the hospital is investing in and prioritizing safety.</p></li><li><p>Team size can serve as a facilitator or barrier in implementation. For use of the Safety Climate Thermometer, small to medium sized teams of less than sixty healthcare professionals seem most suitable. All three teams had five to ten representatives attend the interdisciplinary team meetings, which turned out work well in practice. </p></li></l></p><p>  <unl>Implementation outcomes</unl>  </p><p>Acceptability:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Satisfaction with content and design was high overall.</p></li><li><p>Two sentences in the online Safety Climate Thermometer scoring were rephrased to minimize confusion and &lsquo;finger-pointing&rsquo; to leadership.</p></li></l></p><p>Practicality:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Participants were able to carry out their improvement plans, without significant or unforeseen hurdles.</p></li><li><p>Usability was high overall. Participants were unanimous in their appreciation of ease with which they could score safety climate online (using a thermometer sliding bar) and the following interdisciplinary meetings.</p></li></l></p><p>  <unl>Demand:</unl>  </p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Around half of participants intended to continue use. Participants mainly valued the implementation of the interdisciplinary team meetings and intended to continue those. Use of the online scoring tool as part of the Safety Climate Thermometer was perceived as less essential.</p></li><li><p>Fit within organizational culture was perceived as high. Participants praised the practical and simple nature of the online scoring. For example, some drew similarities with the visual analogue scale for pain.</p></li></l></p><p>  <unl>Implementation:</unl>  </p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>The most important observed resource needed to implement was time. Planning interdisciplinary team meetings in a surgical setting proved challenging.</p></li><li><p>Efficiency, speed and quality of implementation was observed to vary greatly between the three teams. Reasons for this included: difficult/unclear team or stakeholder dynamics, planning difficulties, impact of the COVID-19 pandemic during the study period and an (in hindsight) insufficient preparation phase.</p></li></l></p><p>  <unl>Adaptation:</unl>  </p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>The Safety Climate Thermometer tool was adaptable to local team context. We noticed not all teams initially wanted to change the contents, although we explicitly offered to customize the content for online scoring. After the implementation, some participants voiced that in hindsight they should have customized the content to better fit local context.</p></li></l></p><p>  <unl>Local outcomes</unl> included a revision of the patient clustering model on the surgical ward initiated by the nurses, improvements in onboarding for junior doctors on the surgical ward and the introduction of crew resource management trainings.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>For an interdisciplinary safety culture tool -including ours- to work, one needs time/prioritization of the project, broad endorsement from the team and stakeholders, ample motivation or a clear need for improvement, a small to medium-sized team, a renumeration agreement, and a &lsquo;driving force&rsquo; to tackle all practical issues and coach the team. And most of all: time. Good implementation (research) takes a lot of time, because trust and change take time. Take even more time to establish trust and prepare: &lsquo;lay the groundwork&rsquo; in the preparation phase.</p><p>The preparation phase is crucial to implementation success. In the preparation phase, attention should be given to building connection and trust with the participating team, extensive exploration of team and stakeholder dynamics (e.g. through a review of existing hierarchy, participating in &lsquo;walkrounds&rsquo; or &lsquo;shadowing days&rsquo;, and having individual conversations with participating healthcare professionals), inventory of past improvement experiences, adaptation of the online Safety Climate Thermometer scoring tool to local/team context, and establishing a clear-cut definition of the team using it, as determined in accordance <I>with</I> team representatives.</p><p>Having periodic interdisciplinary team meetings already in place, as well as having a motivated &lsquo;driving force&rsquo; to coach the team are crucial factors for successful implementation.</p><p>The main thing participating nurses indicated in the focus groups and individual interviews was that they finally felt heard by team leaders, managers and boards. Through implementation of this tool, they perceived to be taken more seriously and felt their needs were better incorporated in important decision-making.</p><p>Finally, although time is needed for change, change can also be in small things that do not necessarily require much time or money. By choosing small intended outcomes, the focus is more on building a routine of interdisciplinary team meetings.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>NIVEL. 2022. Monitor Zorggerelateerde Schade 2019: Dossieronderzoek bij overleden patie&#x0308;nten in Nederlandse ziekenhuizen [in Dutch], issue ISBN 978-94-6122-720-1. Accessed: May 16th 2022: https://www.nivel.nl/sites/default/files/bestanden/1004156.pdf</p></li><li><p>ACSNI (Advisory Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations) study group on human factors. London (United Kingdom) HM Stationery Office, 1993.</p></li><li><p>Babic, <I>et al</I>. Sustained culture and surgical outcome improvement. <I>Am J Surg</I>. 2018;<b>216</b>(5):841&ndash;845. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.02.016.</p></li><li><p>Odell, <I>et al</I>. Association between hospital safety culture and surgical outcomes in a statewide surgical quality improvement collaborative. <I>J Am Coll Surg.</I> 2019;<b>229</b>(2):175&ndash;183. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.02.046.</p></li><li><p>Hansen, Williams, Singer. Perceptions of hospital safety climate and incidence of readmission. <I>Health Serv Res</I> 2011;<b>46</b>(2):596&ndash;616. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01204.x</p></li><li><p>Hofmann, Mark. An investigation of the relationship between safety climate and medication errors as well as other nurse and patient outcomes. <I>Personnel Psychology</I> 2006;<b>59</b>(4):847&ndash;869. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00056.x</p></li><li><p>Vogus, <I>et al</I>. Safety organizing, emotional exhaustion, and turnover in hospital nursing units. <I>Med Care</I> 2014;<b>52</b>(10):870&ndash;6. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000169</p></li><li><p>Mossburg, Dennison Himmelfarb. The association between professional burnout and engagement with patient safety culture and outcomes: a systematic review. <I>J Patient Saf</I> 2021;<b>17</b>(8):e1307-e1319. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000519</p></li><li><p>Van der Linde, <I>et al</I>. Design of the safety climate thermometer to promote team dialogue in surgical teams, using a thematic literature review and international expert panel study. <I>Discov Health Systems</I> 2024;<b>3</b>:100. doi: 10.1007/s44250-024-00161-y</p></li><li><p>Bowen, <I>et al</I>. How we design feasibility studies. <I>Am J Prev Med.</I> 2009 May;<b>36</b>(5):452&ndash;457. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002</p></li><li><p>Trint online transcription software. Trint Ltd. Retrieved from: https://trint.com.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van der Linde, E. M., van Grevenstein, W. M. U., Burdorf, A., Henk Coert, J., Wauben, L. S. G. L., Dekker- van Doorn, C. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.237</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.237</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[237 Barriers and facilitators in implementing a new safety climate tool]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A177</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A179</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A180?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[240 Walking the talk - executive team using QI methods to increase their effectiveness]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A180?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust (KCHFT) is a large community trust employing around 5000 staff and delivering over 100 different services. The trust is on an improvement journey and the executive team wanted to improve their knowledge and experience of improvement methodology by undertaking their own project addressing complex problems they were experiencing every day. The team felt frustrated that ways of working were very busy and reactive, leaving little time available to think and act strategically and deliberately. The team felt this prevented them from adding maximum value and affected their enjoyment of work. Whilst it is well documented that employee engagement and satisfaction at work is linked to better outcomes for the organisation and for patients, making this happen &lsquo;top down&rsquo; has its limitations. KCHFT wants to create an environment where front line teams feel able and motivated to make changes that directly affect their enjoyment of work.</p><p>The executive team aimed to both understand and improve their own effectiveness and enjoyment of work, and to lead by example in sharing their project with the community of practice and wider trust.</p><p>We established a baseline measurement using two questions and a comments box :-</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Overall, I enjoyed my work today (baseline)/this week (PDSA) using 1&ndash;4 options</p></li><li><p>I had enough time today/this week to think and act strategically &ndash; mostly yes/mostly no</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>The Model for Improvement was used as part of a sequence of improvement. Having identified the problem, we used structured sessions and informal conversations to surface contributing factors and create a fishbone diagram. We explored our individual and collective experiences of working in our executive team, identifying things that contributed to a good day, and things that got in the way of enjoying work. We started to think and talk about how this was affecting us, our staff and ultimately our patients.</p><p>We grouped our causes into themes of self, systems/processes, wider environment and culture. We then selected those that were in our sphere of influence or control and formulated some change ideas.</p><p>Using PDSA cycles we have begun testing our ideas using our measure to assess impact.</p><p>PDSA#1.1 &ndash; Review all items considered in meeting: Question &lsquo;Did we need to table this?&rsquo;</p><p>PDSA#1.2 &ndash; Identify specific items and deal with them in a different way </p><p>PDSA#2.1 &ndash; Reducing email burden &ndash; stop using &lsquo;cc&rsquo; and only send directly to someone if relevant.</p><p>PDSA#2.2 &ndash; If forwarding an email trail for input, summarise well for the recipient so they don&rsquo;t have to read the whole trail to understand the background. State clearly what is required of the recipient of the forwarded email trail.</p><p>PDSA#3.1 Identify a minimum of half day per week and protect from scheduled activities.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We are in the early stages of testing change ideas, for PDSA 1 we have adopted the change and reduced the number of papers coming to the executive meeting, reduced the length of papers with more succinct and fewer reports. This is not a change in specified process but a change in behaviours and expectations of the group.</p><p>We have captured baseline data with a median and are continuing to capture data whilst undertaking these tests. The data will be presented at the conference</p></sec><sec><st>Learning</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>We think executives leading by practical example in this way is novel. Through role modelling these small-scale tests of change we plan to use this to increase our connection with staff at all levels.</p></li><li><p>Doing &lsquo;Alongside&rsquo; and not &lsquo;Unto&rsquo; is giving us a way to make our mission statements real and meaningful.</p></li><li><p>Making the measurement process as easy as possible for the team has been essential, we have developed a one click link to a Teams Form that gathers the data for us.</p></li><li><p>The challenge of protecting time to review and discuss the project in a monthly half day has been difficult but essential to the progress to date.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phillips, S., Butterworth, P., Shearer, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.240</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.240</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[240 Walking the talk - executive team using QI methods to increase their effectiveness]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A180</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A181</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A181?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[241 Shaping the landscape of healthcare access: preparing nursing graduate students to increase healthcare access for underserved populations]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A181?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Health inequities persist, particularly among socioeconomically challenged populations in rural areas. A universal determinant of health is access to care. Despite advances in telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic, there remains a shortage of healthcare providers. Addressing the shortage of primary care providers, such as advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs), is critical to increasing access to care.<sup>1</sup>  </p><p>The geographic maldistribution of APRNs is understandable, as work in remote areas is seen as less attractive and often offers lower wages. Attracting providers to serve marginalized populations and practice in rural areas is not as simple as offering higher wages. Leveraging nurse education programs to improve healthcare access is crucial because healthcare providers trained in rural or underserved areas are more likely to continue practicing there.<sup>2,3</sup> This abstract explores the influence of an educational scholarship program on the employment choices of new APRN graduates.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This nationally sponsored student scholarship program utilized evidence-based practices to increase the number of healthcare providers in rural, tribal, and underserved populations. We intentionally recruited students from diverse backgrounds in the Midwestern United States. The program provided approximately 75% of tuition and a small stipend for living expenses. Scholarship recipients were required to complete extracurricular education via online modules. These modules offered realistic expectations for various care settings, culturally relevant knowledge about the populations, and explored social determinants of health related to nursing practice. Students in this program completed at least half of their clinical rotations in underserved communities and sites, such as correctional facilities, LGBTQ+ services, mental health, telehealth, nursing homes, rural areas, and low-income locations.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The application scoring process yielded a diverse cohort, with 55 scholarships awarded to date. The racial and ethnic composition of recipients is shown in <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 241 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Racial and ethnic comparison of student cohort</p></caption><link locator="241_F1"></fig></p><p>The overarching results included an enriched precepted clinical experience focusing on the care of underserved populations. Enhancing partnerships across health, social, and education sectors and increasing educational and service requirements were vital to placing new graduates into underserved population settings. Clinical partners valued the new rotations. A preceptor in an LGBTQ+ clinic shared, &lsquo;Understanding this patient population carries an underlying level of anxiety, depression, or PTSD due to the discrimination and bias they have experienced empowers the students to become more affirming in the care for this culture.&rsquo; A mental health preceptor stated, &lsquo;Clinical experience in the prison system is very valuable for students from multiple disciplines, working with a wide range of personal backgrounds. We love having students and find that many eventually join our team as employees.&rsquo;</p><p>This program has also made a notable impact on the grant recipients. One student expressed, &lsquo;This experience made me more aware of many patients&lsquo; struggles beyond their medical conditions. It also reinforced the importance of compassionate, patient-centered care&mdash;sometimes, it is not just about the treatment itself but about recognizing and addressing the underlying challenges that impact health.&rsquo; Another student concluded, &lsquo;These personal experiences have significantly influenced my approach to nursing. I am now more attuned to my patients&lsquo; barriers to accessing healthcare, particularly in rural or underserved areas. This awareness drives me to ensure that discharge plans and follow-up care are medically appropriate and logistically feasible for each patient, considering their specific socioeconomic and geographical constraints.&rsquo;</p><p>At the completion of the first year of the program, 75% of the graduates reported working in underserved areas, providing care to rural, diverse, and vulnerable populations. Although causality has not been shown, it is interesting to note that admissions into the APRN program at the College have increased by 25% since the scholarship program was launched.</p><p>This program is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as part of an award totalling $649,905 with 0% percentage financed with non-governmental sources. The contents are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of, nor an endorsement, by HRSA, HHS, or the U.S. Government. For more information, please visit HRSA.gov.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Neprash HT, Smith LB, Sheridan B, Moscovice I, Prasad S, Kozhimannil K. Nurse practitioner autonomy and complexity of care in rural primary care. <I>Med Care Res Rev</I>. 2021;<b>78</b>(6):684&ndash;692. doi:10.1177/1077558720945913</p></li><li><p>Russell D, Mathew S, Fitts M, <I>et al</I>. Interventions for health workforce retention in rural and remote areas: a systematic review. <I>Human Resources for Health</I> 2021/08/26 2021;<b>19</b>(1):103. doi:10.1186/s12960-021-00643-7</p></li><li><p>Krofft K, Stuart W. Implementing a mentorship program for new nurses during a pandemic. <I>Nurs Adm Q</I>. 2021;<b>45</b>(2):152&ndash;158. doi:10.1097/naq.0000000000000455</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon, J. A., Costner-Lark, A., Allen, K., Dresser, S., Shreffler, K., Yellseagle, D., Craft, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.241</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.241</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[241 Shaping the landscape of healthcare access: preparing nursing graduate students to increase healthcare access for underserved populations]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A181</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A182</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A182?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[242 Harm is harm: incorporating the patient experience of avoidable harm in the science of investigation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A182?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>There is a global call to learn from patient experiences of avoidable harm for healthcare improvement. However, a paradigm shift is required. Healthcare organizations must expand their understanding of avoidable harm beyond the historical focus on physical harms. At University Health Network (UHN) - a large multisite academic health science centre in Canada - a multi-disciplinary working group recognized the need for an expanded definition of avoidable patient harm where harm goes beyond physical harms and includes non-physical harms (NPH).</p><p>We define NPH as: event(s) causing damaging effects to an individual&rsquo;s dignity or their emotional, psychological, social, or spiritual health.</p></sec><sec><st>Intervention</st><p>Using quality improvement methods, a learning response framework to identify, analyse and learn from avoidable physical and non-physical patient harms was co-designed and integrated into existing patient safety reporting and learning process. Focus groups with patient partners, and leaders, were conducted to determine the required resources to learn from patient experiences of NPH. Results informed the development of a framework, including scoring matrix, and toolkit for implementation. Further, de-identified feedback cases were reviewed and screened using the proposed matrix, with level of agreement from 10 reviewers analysed to inform the iterative improvement of the matrix. Understanding of NPH by impacted leaders and teams was assessed using a pre/post knowledge survey. Additionally, the rate of NPH cases is tracked to monitor and inform improvement.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Focus groups conducted with patent partners on processes for reporting and reviewing NPH revealed several potential patient priorities, including: the need for a patient-facing NPH reporting form, an anonymous reporting option, increased psychological safety in sharing experiences, and increased awareness/visibility of the reporting process and potential outcomes. Focus groups with leaders revealed several anticipated gaps, including: an accepted definition of NPH, a process to identify and review NPH incidents, role clarity in the review process, and communication strategies for team engagement with this new concept. Also articulated was the need for a leadership toolkit to support operationalization, and standardized education for reporting and review of NPH. Based on these focus groups, the NPH framework launched across the organization in April 2024, and included: a co-designed definition, screening matrix for consistent case identification; and analysis resources. A leadership toolkit was also launched, and included: NPH definition, supportive resources to discuss NPH with teams; and tools for identification and review of NPH cases. Pre/post knowledge survey conducted with impacted leaders and teams demonstrated an increase in NPH knowledge post framework deployment across all groups (leaders=13%, Patient Relations=13%, Patient Safety= 30%), with reasonable response rates (Leaders pre n=98, post n=54; Patient Relations: pre n=6, post n=5; Patient Safety: pre n=6, post n=6).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Incorporating a broad view of avoidable patient harm in incident reporting and learning adds to the science of incident investigation. The involvement of patient partners was critical in the development of the of the screening matrix, as well as processes for reporting NPH that were responsive to, and considered patient needs, including psychological safety in the reporting process. The lessons learned from NPH cases identified and reviewed since launch of the framework will continue to inform improvements reflective of what matters most to our patients. Additionally, this framework supports responding to patient experiences of care and their expressed need for improved healthcare outcomes.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fox, J., Ballantyne, J., Drews, S., Tatangelo, K., Pozzobon, L. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.242</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.242</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[242 Harm is harm: incorporating the patient experience of avoidable harm in the science of investigation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A182</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A182</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A183?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[243 Leveraging AI to enhance patient safety and its associated implications]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A183?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance patient safety is an increasingly important consideration in modern healthcare. This study will explore the integration of AI in healthcare, focusing on its potential to improve treatment strategies and patient outcomes while addressing the associated legal, ethical, and moral implications. By fostering an understanding of AI&rsquo;s role in healthcare, the aim is to shed light on how AI can aid in increasing efficiency without overburdening or replacing the healthcare workforce.</p><p>AI has been a part of everyone&rsquo;s lives; whether they are aware or not. From simple acts such as AI powered chat-bots to schedule appointments to visit a hospital or clinic in the patient&lsquo;s residence, to the use of AI in complex procedures like Robotic surgery, AI has taken up a vast majority of tasks in aspects related to healthcare.</p><p>Almost everyone; including not just the delegates who would be present at the session or the patients who are active users of medical care, would fall into the category of those with lived experience of using AI in their health-related matters. Most people aren&rsquo;t aware of how prevalent AI has become in the assistance of proper management and diagnosis of their health, which is why I wish to shed more light on this matter. I think it is quite interesting to discuss this novel concept of technological implementation in the years of practice which was once purely human-based.</p></sec><sec><st>Research Question</st><p>What are the potential impacts of artificial intelligence integration on patient safety, treatment efficiency, and healthcare workforce dynamics?</p><p>The possibility of machines being able to simulate human behavior and actually think was raised earlier by Alan Turing who developed the Turing test in order to differentiate humans from machines. Since then, computational power has grown to the point of instant calculations and the ability evaluate new data, according to previously assessed data, in real time.The growing presence of AI in healthcare systems has sparked debates over its effectiveness and safety. The opportunities and challenges associated with AI adoption, particularly in minimizing human error, enhancing data accuracy, and improving diagnostic precision are of prime importance.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This study utilized a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature and qualitative narrative interviews with healthcare professionals. Research articles were analyzed to assess AI&rsquo;s role in patient safety, focusing on error reduction, diagnostic accuracy, and treatment efficiency. Additionally, eight narrative interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals and service users to gain insight into real-world AI integration. Ethical considerations were addressed by obtaining appropriate ethics approval for referenced studies and giving due credit to original researchers. Participants were selected through purposive sampling, ensuring diverse perspectives. Interviews followed a semi-structured format, lasting 30&ndash;45 minutes, and were thematically analyzed to identify key insights on AI&rsquo;s benefits, challenges, and ethical concerns.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>AI integration has demonstrated significant potential in reducing medical errors, enhancing data accuracy, and providing real-time diagnostic support. Automated services such as dosage calculations and anomaly detection have proven effective in increasing the precision of care. The primary objective of implementing AI is to seamlessly coordinate healthcare processes while minimizing manual errors. Despite its advantages, AI integration poses challenges, including data privacy concerns and financial burdens associated with implementation and maintenance. Real-world cases, such as the Hadiza Bawa-Garba incident, highlight the dire consequences of human error, emphasizing the need for technological support to improve patient safety.</p><p>The rising number of deaths and disabilities due to negligence and inaccuracies in the treatment given to patients is the prime reason for the conduction of this study. It is an issue that can be eliminated fairly easily with the appropriate inclusion of AI in our healthcare systems. The main objectives for integrating AI into healthcare databases are mainly surrounding error minimization caused by manual data entry, patient diagnosis, etc. It also enhances the accuracy and timely delivery of treatment; to deduce the patient&rsquo;s diagnosis and provide the best possible treatment in the shortest time frame. Automated services would facilitate easier and smooth delivery of treatment thereby increasing patient satisfaction and subsequent return for care. AI-based dosage calculations and real-time anomaly detection would increase the precision of care and reduce the scope of error. The main goal of this strategy would involve the successful integration and coordination of all healthcare departments simultaneously and efficiently. In a prima-facie analysis in the view of the untrained eye, AI in the healthcare scene serves merely as a substitute for robotically typing out patient details. Various developments made to this new-found technology prove this wrong. Diagnostic imaging such as CT- scans and X-rays have been, for example, made possible by technology and has the potential to be perfected further using AI. Automated Data Entry into Electronic Health Records - as mentioned earlier - has rendered manual data entry obsolete. People who have previously engaged in professions have lost their jobs. To allow for the proper conduction of this project, I have analyzed various research articles that explore the unlocked potential of AI and have taken reviews from healthcare professionals who are closely acquainted with the usage of AI in healthcare. According to the report, &lsquo;To Err is Human&rsquo;, deaths and disabilities caused by lack of proper care are one of the most prevalent causes globally, and a significant number of these can be prevented. The cases are on the rise by the day, despite having sufficient manpower and infrastructural facilities. The Hadiza Bawa-Garba case is one such painful example that reminds us medical professionals and future workers how negligence and human error can lead to tragic consequences. A vast majority of interviewed candidates agreed on the benefits of technology integration and further advocated for its development and implementation as the fundamental component of modern healthcare. Although an overwhelming majority of those I had an opportunity to interact with were of the view that AI implementation is a significant win for global development, a few others did express their concerns over AI being a source of danger for the future of healthcare. AI integration does come with its own set of disadvantages. The potential breach of confidentiality compromises the data privacy and security of patients, continuing to be a cause of serious concern for patients. The cost incurred for incorporating and managing AI software can be a significant burden for both the government and private healthcare institutions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>While AI holds great promise in enhancing patient safety and treatment efficiency, it must be integrated thoughtfully and ethically within healthcare systems. Addressing privacy, cost, and potential workforce implications is crucial for successful adoption. Ethics must remain at the forefront in the ever-evolving realm of healthcare technology. This study seeks to prompt thoughtful discussions around the balance between technological innovation and maintaining human-centered care in healthcare settings.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Institute of Medicine. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. National Academy Press, 1999.</p></li><li><p>Elendu C, Amaechi DC, Elendu TC, Jingwa KA, Okoye OK, John Okah M, Ladele JA, Farah AH, Alimi HA. (n.d.). Ethical implications of AI and robotics in healthcare: a review. <I>Medicine</I>.</p></li><li><p>Mintz Y, Brodie R. Introduction to artificial intelligence in medicine. <I>Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol</I> 2019.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Azad, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.243</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.243</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[243 Leveraging AI to enhance patient safety and its associated implications]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A183</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A184</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A191?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[254 The golden minute: a quality improvement project on optimal cord management in preterm infants in a level 2 neonatal unit]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A191?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Optimal Cord Management (OCM) is an evidence-based intervention shown to reduce mortality and improve cardiovascular status in preterm infants. OCM is defined as delaying umbilical cord clamping for a minimum of 60 seconds in all preterm infants less than 34 weeks gestation, unless contraindicated.<sup>1</sup>  </p><p>This quality improvement project aimed to increase OCM rate at University Hospital Lewisham Neonatal Unit from 33% (baseline in September 2024) to 100% by the end of February 2025.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>Retrospective data were collected weekly via BadgerNet system for the project period of 1st of October 2024 to 28th of February 2025. Inclusion criteria were all preterm infants born &lt;34 weeks gestation eligible for OCM born in University Hospital Lewisham during the project period. Exclusion criteria followed contraindications outlined by British Association of Perinatal Medicine, including acute maternal haemorrhage, ruptured vasa praevia, twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome and umbilical cord complications.<sup>1</sup> Primary measure was time of OCM achieved in seconds, with a target aim of at least 60 seconds.</p><p>The Model for Improvement was utilised to design the project and test change ideas. Change ideas were implemented through Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Data analysis was performed using a run chart to assess the baseline and the impact of interventions.</p><p>A key intervention involved adapting a protocol from another hospital within the same trust,<sup>2</sup> incorporating the Neonatal Life Support (NLS) algorithm for preterm resuscitation, as illustrated in <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>. The recommendation involves having a senior clinician next to the neonate during delivery to allow better clinical assessment and appropriate interventions, including heart rate auscultation, airway management, and stimulation, all while supporting OCM.</p><p>Additional interventions included information sharing with the perinatal team through presentations, conducting multidisciplinary simulation sessions and introducing the Lifestart&trade; machine to assist with OCM during resuscitation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Following the implementation of four PDSA cycles, the project achieved a 100% OCM rate (n=13) for eligible preterm infants during the project duration. The run chart in <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref> demonstrated a clear shift from baseline to post-intervention outcomes, with marked improvements in the time of cord clamping. This significant change resulted in improved preterm optimisation, which leads to better neonatal outcomes.<sup>1</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>This quality improvement project successfully increased the OCM rate for eligible babies, demonstrating the effectiveness of simple yet strategic interventions. Teamwork with the wider perinatal team, coupled with training and protocol adaptations contributed to the achievement of OCM. These changes not only improved the timing of cord clamping but also enhanced the overall care of preterm infants, highlighting the importance of collaboration and evidence-based practices in neonatal care.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>British Association of Perinatal Medicine. <I>Optimal cord management in preterm babies: A quality improvement toolkit</I>. December 2020.</p></li><li><p>Eldalal M, Paliwal S. Simple methods to improve compliance with DCC for babies &lt;34 weeks&rsquo; gestation: a QI project. <I>Infant</I> 2024;<b>20</b>(3):80&ndash;83.</p></li></l></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 254 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Infographic for optimising OCM in preterm babies born &lt;34 weeks</p></caption><link locator="254_F1"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 254 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Run chart showing the time of cord clamping for eligible babies born at &lt;34 weeks gestation, both before and after the project, indicated by the four PDSA cycles</p></caption><link locator="254_F2"></fig></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siau Oi Chang, R., Uzokwe, U., Ibrahim, F., Paliwal, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.254</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.254</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[254 The golden minute: a quality improvement project on optimal cord management in preterm infants in a level 2 neonatal unit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A191</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A193</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A193?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[255 Reducing admissions for pleural effusions by 50% by September 2024]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A193?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Pleural effusions are a common medical presentation with an estimated incidence of 337 per 100 000 people (Sundaralingam et al, 2024) placing an increasing burden on both elective and non-elective respiratory workloads. Reducing acute admissions, length of stay, and delivering a high-quality pleural service are key improvement recommendations of the Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) report and NHS England Best Practice Tariff (2024). The target is to increase the percentage of pleural patients with a length of stay of zero to 75% (outpatient management) (NHS England, 2021). </p><p>The authors&rsquo; local pleural service was started in 2018 and was a limited service, with one consultant clinic a week. No sustainability, cross cover and delays in outpatient appointments led to delayed diagnoses and missed treatment opportunities, resulting in avoidable hospital admissions, and poor patient experience (Dolan, 2019). Fortunately, as the team expanded there was more interest/drive to develop the service. Our aim was to reduce the number of pleural admissions by 50% by September 2024 by streamlining and developing the pleural service.</p><p>Data was collected via the Trust Business Intelligence service for the number of inpatient admissions where the primary issue was a pleural effusion, a retrospective study focusing on how the interventions affected admissions.</p></sec><sec><st>Intervention</st><p>The team started to develop a business case, highlighting the gaps in the service and completing risk assessments. A driver diagram was developed (see <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>).</p><p>To improve the outpatient service and meet the current need for follow up appointments, a pleural secretary was appointed, and the number of pleural clinics was increased from 1 to 3, this included an ACP led clinic. To improve the inpatient service bi-monthly ACP/consultant teaching sessions were arranged. A weekly pleural multi-disciplinary team meeting was organised to discuss complex patients.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 255 Figure 1</no><link locator="255_F1"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>There is now availability in clinic for early intervention and diagnosis, reducing patient wait time, avoiding hospital admission and providing a better service for patients.</p><p>There has been a statistically significant reduction in the number of adult admissions for pleural effusions, with the increased productivity equating to approximately &pound;455,243 gained since October 2020 to September 2024. Estimate on average a net gain of &pound;379,302 since October 2020 to September 2024 (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>). Potential admission avoidance saving to the Trust is &pound;636 172 from October 2020 to September 2024. </p><p>Noticeable change has occurred following the increase in clinics and employment of the pleural nurse. Ongoing data collection and analysis will support sustainability however there are ongoing issues of no approved business case and long-term funding. (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F3">Figure 3</cross-ref>)</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 255 Figure 2</no><link locator="255_F2"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F3"><no>Abstract 255 Figure 3</no><link locator="255_F3"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Dolan B, Holt L. (2019) Last 1000 Days. Health Service 360. Available at: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">Last 1000 Days - Health Service 360</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>NHS England. (2021). Respiratory Medicine: GIRFT Program National Speciality Report. Available at: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://gettingitrightfirsttime.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Respiratory-Medicine-Oct21L.pdf</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>NHS England (2024) NHS payment scheme Annex C: guidance on Best Practice Tarriff. Available at: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">23-25NPS - amended Annex C Guidance on best practice tariffs</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Sundaralingam A, Grabczak E, Burra P. (2014). ESR Statement on benign pleural effusions in adults. <I>European Respiratory Society</I>  <b> 64</b> (6) DOI: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.02307-2023</inter-ref>  </p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Duckworth, R., Overton, N., Ashraf, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.255</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.255</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[255 Reducing admissions for pleural effusions by 50% by September 2024]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A193</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A195</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A197?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[261 Reducing patient no-shows & cancellations in a multi-specialty outpatient clinic]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A197?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Patient no-shows and cancellations significantly impact patient care, experience, and healthcare operations. Missed appointments lead to waste of valuable clinical resources such as time, personnel, and facility use,<sup>1</sup> while also contributing to direct revenue loss due to the difficulty of filling vacant slots on short notice. Specialty clinic providers invest substantial time reviewing patient records before consultations, while clinical and administrative staff coordinate room preparation and scheduling logistics, further exacerbating resource strain. Beyond operational inefficiencies, missed appointments contribute to increased wait times, reduced access for other patients, and delays in necessary care.<sup>2 3</sup> Additionally, disruptions in timely follow-up and care continuity can negatively impact patient outcomes and satisfaction.<sup>4 5</sup> To address these challenges, healthcare administrators often implement patient engagement strategies, such as appointment reminders, to improve adherence.<sup>6</sup>  </p><p>In 2023, our center reported an 8.9% no-show rate and a high cancellation rate of 21.8%, leading to resource strain and care disruptions. To address this issue, a multidisciplinary Quality Improvement (QI) project was launched, aiming to reduce these rates by 5% by the end of 2024. Through root cause analysis and evidence-based interventions, we sought to optimize scheduling, improve operational efficiency, and enhance patient communication.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This study was conducted at a multi-specialty outpatient clinic with a multidisciplinary team comprising staff from patient experience, patient access, information technology, electronic medical records, revenue cycle management, nursing, and executive leadership. Project members engaged in root cause analyses to identify key factors contributing to high no-show and cancellation rates, and employed the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA)<sup>7</sup> to implement targeted interventions. Findings were shared through team meetings and reports, with targeted briefings to patient-facing staff to enhance their understanding of challenges of care continuity and empower them to reinforce appointment adherence during patient interactions.</p><p>To address the persistent issue of patient no-shows and cancellations, we began by enhancing data collection within our EMR to identify the underlying reasons for patients cancelling appointments. Standardized cancellation procedures were established to ensure accurate data recording of no-shows and minimize manual cancellations if the patient failed to inform the facility before their scheduled time. Additionally, we optimized our scheduling practices by enforcing the rescheduling of patient appointments to the nearest availability instead of cancelling them in the event of clinic-initiated cancellations to retain patient appointments and maximize clinic utilization. To improve patient engagement, we introduced a multi-modal communication strategy, incorporating automated two-way WhatsApp reminders and Interactive Voice Response (IVR) call confirmations.</p><p>All interventions were implemented by Q1 2024. Staff were engaged through training sessions and regular meetings to explain the changes, while patient-facing staff verified with patients whether they received reminder calls and messages. Feedback from both groups was used to continuously monitor and refine the interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The impact of the interventions was evaluated by tracking no-show and cancellation rates from January to December 2024, with continuous feedback from a multidisciplinary team to refine communication strategies.</p><p>Following implementation, the cancellation rate decreased from 21.8% in 2023 to 15.04% in 2024, while the no-show rate increased from 8.9% to 10.79%. Despite this, our cancellation rate remains below the reported range of 15&ndash;27% in existing literature,<sup>8</sup> although studies on outpatient clinic cancellations are limited. The no-show rate aligns with the reported 15&ndash;30% range in similar studies.<sup>9</sup> These reductions improved patient care by minimizing appointment disruptions, enhancing access to timely care, and optimizing clinic capacity. Long-term anticipated benefits include improved care continuity and higher patient satisfaction.</p><p>Challenges included technical issues with automated reminders and adaptation difficulties with new scheduling protocols, which were addressed through ongoing staff training and troubleshooting. A key takeaway was the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration, staff training, and iterative feedback loops to ensure successful implementation. We intend to continue monitoring no-show and cancellation rates while expanding future interventions to include follow-up calls for no-show patients and ongoing refinements to scheduling practices to further enhance patient retention.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Norris JB, Kumar C, Chand S, Moskowitz H, Shade SA, Willis DR. An empirical investigation into factors affecting patient cancellations and no-shows at outpatient clinics. <I>Decis Support Syst.</I> 2014 Jan;<b>57</b>:428&ndash;43.</p></li><li><p>Marbouh D, Khaleel I, Al Shanqiti K, Al Tamimi M, Simsekler MCE, Ellahham S, <I>et al</I>. Evaluating the impact of patient no-shows on service quality. <I>Risk Manag Healthc Policy</I> 2020 Jun;<b>13</b>:509&ndash;17.</p></li><li><p>Parikh A, Gupta K, Wilson AC, Fields K, Cosgrove NM, Kostis JB. The effectiveness of outpatient appointment reminder systems in reducing no-show rates. <I>Am J Med.</I> 2010 Jun;<b>123</b>(6):542&ndash;8.</p></li><li><p>Dantas LF, Fleck JL, Cyrino Oliveira FL, Hamacher S. No-shows in appointment scheduling &ndash; a systematic literature review. <I>Health Policy</I> 2018 Apr;<b>122</b>(4):412&ndash;21.</p></li><li><p>Nuti LA, Lawley M, Turkcan A, Tian Z, Zhang L, Chang K, <I>et al</I>. No-shows to primary care appointments: subsequent acute care utilization among diabetic patients. <I>BMC Health Serv Res.</I> 2012 Dec;<b>12</b>(1):304.</p></li><li><p>Boone CE, Celhay P, Gertler P, Gracner T, Rodriguez J. How scheduling systems with automated appointment reminders improve health clinic efficiency. <I>J Health Econ.</I> 2022 Mar;<b>82</b>:102598.</p></li><li><p>Langley GJ, Moen R, Nolan KM, Norman CL, Provost LP. The improvement guide: a practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. 2nd Edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 2009.</p></li><li><p>Harris SL, May JH, Vargas LG, Foster KM. The effect of cancelled appointments on outpatient clinic operations. <I>Eur J Oper Res.</I> 2020 Aug;<b>284</b>(3):847&ndash;60.</p></li><li><p>Davies M, Goffman R, May J, Monte R, Rodriguez K, Tjader Y, <I>et al</I>. Large-scale no-show patterns and distributions for clinic operational research. <I>Healthcare</I> 2016 Feb 16;<b>4</b>(1):15.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DSilva, J., Popatia, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.261</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.261</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[261 Reducing patient no-shows & cancellations in a multi-specialty outpatient clinic]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A197</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A197</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A198?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[262 Learning through reporting, investigation, and change - enhancing safety culture and increasing event reporting]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A198?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>In the dynamic landscape of healthcare, fostering a robust safety culture is paramount to ensuring patient well-being and enhancing overall care quality.<sup>1&ndash;4</sup> A new Multi-Specialty Outpatient Clinic and Day Surgery Center recognized the imperative to bolster safety event reporting within its facility. The Quality and Patient Safety Department initiated &lsquo;Learning through Reporting, Investigation, and Change - Enhancing Safety Culture and Increasing Event Reporting,&rsquo; aiming to strengthen the nexus between patient safety event reporting and the cultivation of a just culture, while concurrently prioritizing patient experience.<sup>2 3</sup>  </p><p>In the first quarter of 2023, the Multi-Specialty Outpatient Clinic and Day Surgery Center observed that monthly safety event reporting was lower than expected. This low reporting rate suggested a potential lack of staff confidence and awareness regarding a non-punitive reporting environment.<sup>3 4</sup> A subsequent Patient Safety Culture Survey conducted in July 2023 achieved an 88% response rate, surpassing the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) benchmark.<sup>3</sup> While 96% of respondents rated patient safety positively, only 31% had reported an event in the past year, indicating barriers such as assumption fear of blame.<sup>2 4</sup> Despite positive ratings in teamwork and organizational learning, the low reporting rates highlighted missed opportunities for systemic learning and improvement.<sup>5</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>To address these challenges, the Quality and Patient Safety Department implemented a comprehensive framework aimed at strengthening the safety culture and increasing event reporting.<sup>1 2</sup> Staff received extensive training in reporting processes to ensure clarity and accessibility, equipping them with the necessary knowledge to navigate safety protocols effectively.<sup>3</sup> The introduction of the Good Catch Program encouraged vigilance and proactive engagement by recognizing and rewarding staff for identifying and reporting near misses.<sup>5</sup> Additionally, quarterly Safety Event Huddles were organized to facilitate open discussions on adverse events, fostering collective learning and continuous improvement.<sup>2</sup>  </p><p>Leadership engagement played a crucial role in this initiative, with regular Leadership and Safety Rounds conducted in clinical units.<sup>1 3</sup> These rounds incorporated Safety Culture Interviews, providing staff with a supportive platform to voice their concerns.<sup>4</sup> Informal interactions were also encouraged through Coffee Mornings with the Director of Clinical Operations, fostering open communication and trust among team members.<sup>3</sup> To reinforce individual accountability, the department introduced &lsquo;Patient Safety Starts with Me&rsquo; pins, emphasizing personal responsibility in maintaining patient safety standards.<sup>5</sup>  </p><p>A dedicated Quality and Patient Safety Week further engaged units through workshops, educational entertainment, and collaborative projects focused on enhancing patient safety and quality improvement.<sup>1</sup> Quality Boards were established in nursing stations to enhance transparency by displaying monthly safety event discussions, lessons learned, and action plans, ensuring continuous learning across teams.<sup>4</sup> Additionally, an Ethics Committee was formed to provide an anonymous platform for raising ethical concerns, promoting an environment where difficult issues could be addressed openly and constructively.<sup>2</sup> Through this multifaceted approach, the department successfully strengthened the culture of safety and improved reporting practices across the organization.<sup>1 5</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The implementation of these strategies led to the establishment of an electronic Safety Event System, enabling comprehensive tracking of safety events.<sup>1 2</sup> From January 2023 to September 2024, monthly safety event reporting exhibited fluctuations, with a low of 7&ndash;10 incidents in some months and a peak of 45 in July 2024.<sup>2 5</sup> Notable increases in May 2023 (29 events), January 2024 (37 events), and July 2024 suggest heightened awareness and strengthened reporting culture.<sup>3 5</sup> While most months in 2023 recorded below 20 events, 2024 demonstrated an upward trend, with reports ranging between 25 and 45, reflecting positive progress.<sup>2</sup> Although the benchmark rate is 47%, sustained efforts are needed to improve consistency.<sup>3</sup> Leadership support and follow-up surveys sustained relevance, building a safety-focused culture that enhances patient care and staff satisfaction.<sup>1 4</sup> The various strategies boosted safety reporting and staff engagement, fostering a proactive culture.<sup>2 5</sup> Campaigns like &lsquo;Patient Safety Starts with Me&rsquo; reinforced a patient-centered approach.<sup>5</sup>  </p><p>To enhance patient safety, organizations should prioritize a non-punitive culture that allows staff to report incidents without fear of retribution.<sup>3</sup> This approach fosters transparency, learning from mistakes, and sustains an organizational safety culture. Recognizing contributions through initiatives like Good Catch Awards motivates proactive engagement, builds accountability, and encourages staff to identify and mitigate potential risks.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The initiative undertaken by Multi-Specialty Outpatient Clinic and Day Surgery Centre underscores the critical importance of cultivating a non-punitive, transparent, and supportive environment to enhance patient safety. By implementing comprehensive strategies that promote open communication, individual accountability, and continuous learning, healthcare organizations can significantly improve safety event reporting. This, in turn, leads to systemic improvements, elevates patient care standards, and fosters a culture where staff feel empowered to contribute to organizational safety and excellence.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>American Data Network. (2023). Patient Safety Culture: A Comprehensive Guide to Implementation and Improvement.</p></li><li><p>Health Affairs. (2023). Enhancing Safety Culture Through Improved Incident Reporting: A Case Study in Translational Research.</p></li><li><p>Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2023). Ensuring Patient and Workforce Safety Culture in Healthcare.</p></li><li><p>American Data Network. (2023). Culture of Safety in Healthcare: Elevating Patient Outcomes and Trust.</p></li><li><p>ROAR for Good. (2023). The Importance of Incident Reporting in Healthcare.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eltigani, S., Popatia, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.262</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.262</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[262 Learning through reporting, investigation, and change - enhancing safety culture and increasing event reporting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A198</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A198</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A202?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[267 South African department of health applies a 4A systems approach to quality improvement to address systems challenges in the HIV programme]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A202?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Operation Phuthuma (OP) was launched on 01 April 2019, by the South African National Department of Health (NDOH) to drive sustainable interventions and to accelerate progress. Quality Improvement skills and a focus was incorporated into the OP mandate in 2019 in an effort to better understand systems issues and build a sustainable improvement strategy for national implementation within the HIV/AIDS and STIs.</p><p>The HIV/AIDS epidemic and weaknesses in the health system in South Africa, paired with the global focus on ending AIDS as a public health threat by 2030, drove the National Department of Health to move away from vertical programming to a systems level improvement strategy. The Nerve Centre Approach (NCA) which uses the improvement framework called the 4A model, guides health care workers at all levels of the health system to improve service delivery through the adoption of standardised, problem-focused and improvement-driven platforms and tools.</p><p>What is a Nerve Centre?</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>interdepartmental/cluster/caucus</p></li><li><p>focused on a high priority problem/s</p></li><li><p>Oversee and guide improvement plans informed</p></li><li><p>by data, situational and root cause analysis</p></li><li><p>Routinely monitor and analyse data and improvement</p></li><li><p>plans/data to determine impact</p></li><li><p>Ensure the adoption and spread of tried and tested improvements</p></li></l></p><p>Key Principles of a Successful Nerve Centre</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 267 Figure 1</no><link locator="267_F1"></fig></p><p>Quality Improvement Framework Informing the Approach</p><p>In developing the NCA, we used a Quality Improvement project management framework (4A Model) we have found to be extremely useful in providing an overall, big picture improvement lens to the work of OP nerve centres. Before any intervention is ventured into, an assessment should be done. Together assess the current situation, determine what the cause of the problem is, decide where you want to start. To get a different more sustainable result we must do/Act something differently. You must always determine the impact (Result) of the ACT through an analysis. Too often implementation is plagued by activities that we do not know are working or not. Once we find what works, anchor it into the system so we don&rsquo;t keep reinventing the wheel. Remember, if we don&rsquo;t know what we have done, or how we have done it, how will we ever be able to do it again! This model is a simple way of looking at all our work to make sure it is more sustainable and effective.</p></sec><sec><st>Management Level Interventions</st><p>Our health system constantly faces challenges and problems that are manifest at facility level. Some challenges are because of problems occurring at a facility that can be addressed by facility staff; other problems however, are out of the control of facility staff and they rely on managers to make those changes. The role of management therefore must be to CHANGE THE SYSTEM rather than focusing on individuals as the source and solution of the problem. In order to do that, the NCA requires 3 levels of change:</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 267 Figure 2</no><link locator="267_F2"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Implementation Progress</st><p>Focus is on coaching managers to apply and lead:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Refresher trainings</p></li><li><p>Supportive supervision workshops</p></li><li><p>Technical support from OP at visits is on capacitating the DoH manager.</p></li></l></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F3"><no>Abstract 267 Figure 3</no><link locator="267_F3"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Facility Level Interventions</st><p>How programmes are implemented at facility level is complex. There are constantly many activities happening all at the same time, many of which are uncoordinated, lack implementation details and therefore require implementers to constantly be adapting and thinking independently on their feet. This often results in nonstandard processes of delivery. This therefore requires consistent, deliberate, and focused efforts by a team, to address the process of implementation and challenges, for sustained improvement. The process below indicates how this has been standardized at a facility level. Each step in the process is supported with nationally endorsed tools:</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F4"><no>Abstract 267 Figure 4</no><link locator="267_F4"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In provinces where the NCA was widely rolled out, including Gauteng, Eastern Cape, North West, and Free State provinces, the number of people on ART increased by a greater proportion than the national average. For example, between March 2022 and October 2023, the number of people on ART increased by 7% in Gauteng Province, compared to a growth of 5% nationally. At the 100 priority facilities, the number of people on ART increased by 2,216 from 693,064 to 695,280 in a single month.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 267 Table 1</no><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Province</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>NCA Start Date</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Increase in # on ART</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>% Increase on ART</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>National Growth (Same period)</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="5" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Gauteng</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">February 2022 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">79,328 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5% </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Free State</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">May 2022 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">13,744 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4% </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Eastern Cape</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">June 2022 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">37,253 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4% </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>North West</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">June 2022 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">16,542 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4% </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p>Significant learnings have been harvested about health system strengthening and the application of a QI lens across a health system. These learnings will be shared and their impact on patient outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The OP Nerve Centre Approach is a national quality improvement approach that is beginning to show signs of improvement at all levels of the health system. The approach has been catalytic in ensuring alignment to national strategies, a culture of joint problem solving, and has revived an atmosphere of commitment that change in our health system is possible!</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Cathy Green. Lauren de Kock. (2019). How to guide quality improvement guide. <I>Aurum Institute.</I>  <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url"> https://www.auruminstitute.org/component/edocman/continuous-quality-and-improvement</inter-ref> [Accessed March 22, 2025]</p></li><li><p>National Department of Health. (2022[LD1])<I>. Operation Phuthuma Nerve Centre Handbook Version 2.</I> South Africa</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kock, L. D., Ndlovu, A., Fritz, R., Manganye, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.267</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.267</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[267 South African department of health applies a 4A systems approach to quality improvement to address systems challenges in the HIV programme]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A202</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A204</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A204?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[268 Reducing unconfirmed loss to follow (uLTF) and missed appointments, Heidedal community health centre (CHC), Bloemfontein sub-district, Mangaung district, Free State province, South Africa]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A204?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Heidedal CHC is the largest in the Mangaung Metro with a monthly headcount of around 8000 patients. It is one of the only two TROA 100 facilities identified in the Free State Province by National Health Department as having the potential to increase TROA. It was the first public health facility to offer Antiretroviral Treatment to the populations in the surrounding areas. With other feeding facilities now offering ART initiations coupled with migrations of people, the facility for a long time found itself with high numbers of missed appointments. Heidedal CHC has been struggling with all levels of the missed appointments before the implementation of Operation Phuthuma (OP) in the facility with Unconfirmed Loss to Follow (uLTF) ups of 562 in July 202(DHIS, 2023). Early missed (EM) appointments were 191 and, late missed (LM) appointments were at 1070(DHIS Report, 2025). Members of the TROA Indicator team in the facility at some point reported that 70% of the ULTF were clients outside the demarcations of the facility. Other clinic facilities in the surrounding areas are Opkoms, Mmabana, Bloemspruit, and Batho Clinics.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>The Facility nominated the TROA Indicator team in July 2023, but the team started being functional beginning of August 2023. Missed appointment management was identified as a gap from the TROA initial step by step. Although LM appointments were more than the uLTF, the team decided to start with the uLTF because of fears that clients might be lost forever, negatively impacting on TROA. A Quality Improvement plan was developed with the technical assistance of the OP Team. A greater focus was placed on bringing back the uLTFU clients. </p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Results show the facility surpassing its target by 65 at the end of the target month of March. Performance has been below the post median line of 388. Facility performed with steady monthly TROA increases from beginning of the OP implementation in August 2023 to December 2023. Besides experiencing the December phenomenon, the facility was able to pick up in the following month with same steady increase up to June 2024.</p><p>Utilization of the indicator team has seen great strides as witnessed in the TROA performance. The facility is still a favourite for many clients, despite it being surrounded by other facilities from areas where these clients reside. They are weathering the storm with dedicated staff from the passionate TROA indicator champion, indicator team and support of the sub-district, district and provincial management.</p><p>Clinic Committee member from community who is part of the indicator is active and uses every opportunity to sensitize community about what is happening in the facility. This include informing community about challenges facility is facing like wrong addresses and not honoring appointments, all which impact TROA negatively (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figures 1</cross-ref> and <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">2</cross-ref>).</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 268 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Unconfirmed loss to follows (DHIS, 2025)</p></caption><link locator="268_F1"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 268 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Total remaining on ART (DHIS. 2025)</p></caption><link locator="268_F2"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Summary of Interventions</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>In service of the Outreach Team Leader by the Champion on completion of the Tele and Home tracing registers</p></li><li><p>Delegation of Community Health Workers to retrieve 15 ULFT files per day for tracing</p></li><li><p>Targeted weekends of October 2023 and March 2024 for ULTFs file activity focusing on ULTF files audit</p></li><li><p>Compilation of the list of clients outside the facility&rsquo;s demarcation to be traced by the District Tracing Team</p></li><li><p>Inclusion of an active Clinic Committee member in the Indicator team to address patient engagement</p></li><li><p>Deployment of the District Data Roving team to assist with data capturing</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>National Department of Health. (2022). <I>Operation Phuthuma Nerve Centre Handbook Version 2</I>. South Africa</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Letseka, G., Nyoni, E., Lekaba, L., Kock, L. d., Moatlhodi, C., Burger, A., Malebaco, P., Ramodula, B., Chauke, M., Rametsi, O., London, G., Heidedal, C., Heidedal TROA Indicator Team]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.268</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.268</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[268 Reducing unconfirmed loss to follow (uLTF) and missed appointments, Heidedal community health centre (CHC), Bloemfontein sub-district, Mangaung district, Free State province, South Africa]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A204</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A205</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A205?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[269 Improving postoperative catheter care in neurosurgery through standardized protocols: a multicentre before-and-after implementation study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A205?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Presenting author</st><p>Jeanne-Marie Nollen</p></sec><sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Urinary catheterization&mdash;both indwelling (IDUC) and clean intermittent (CIC)&mdash;is widely used in peri- and postoperative care, particularly in neurosurgical patients. While appropriate in specific clinical situations, overuse or misapplication of catheters is associated with a range of complications, including urinary tract infections (UTIs), patient discomfort, decreased mobility, and prolonged hospital stay.<sup>1&ndash;3</sup> Despite international guidelines outlining indications for catheter use, variability in practice persists due to ambiguous thresholds, limited training, and inconsistent adherence to protocols.<sup>4&ndash;6</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This study evaluated the impact of a multifaceted implementation strategy on reducing inappropriate catheterization in neurosurgical patients undergoing pituitary tumour or spinal fusion surgery. A before-and-after design was used across four Dutch hospitals&mdash;one university, two teaching, and one general hospital&mdash;between June 2021 and January 2023. The intervention included a standardized catheter protocol, tailored staff education, and the appointment of departmental champions to drive adoption. Protocols defined inappropriate catheterization based on factors such as surgical duration (&lt;180 minutes), expected postoperative bedrest (&lt;24 hours), and thresholds for urinary retention and residuals.<sup>5 7</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 2,711 adult patients were included (2,167 before; 544 after implementation). Following the intervention, the percentage of patients without inappropriate IDUC increased from 46% to 57%, and those without inappropriate CIC from 34% to 67%. Total catheter use also declined: the proportion of patients not receiving an IDUC rose from 54% to 64%, and those without CIC from 89% to 92%. Ordinal logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, hospital, and surgery type, confirmed statistically significant reductions in total IDUC use (adjusted OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.50&ndash;0.76) and inappropriate CIC use (adjusted OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.13&ndash;0.51). UTI rates remained stable (1.4% vs. 1.3%), and the average length of hospital stay did not increase (4.9 vs. 5.1 days).</p></sec><sec><st>Discussion</st><p>Key factors contributing to success included multidisciplinary buy-in, strong local leadership, and the adaptability of training formats, including online tools necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Challenges involved staff turnover and pre-existing variability in institutional catheter protocols. The role of nurses as key decision-makers in catheter use was expanded, aligning with current literature suggesting nurse-driven catheter management improves outcomes.<sup>8 9</sup>  </p><p>This study highlights the potential of structured, scalable strategies to improve the quality and safety of postoperative care. By combining evidence-based protocols with localized implementation, inappropriate catheter use was significantly reduced without compromising patient safety or length of stay. The findings support broader application of this approach to other surgical disciplines or invasive interventions. Sustained adherence will require ongoing training, audit-feedback loops, and integration into hospital-wide quality improvement systems.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Gould CV, Umscheid CA, Agarwal RK, Kuntz G, Pegues DA, Control HICPACJI, <I>et al</I>. Guideline for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. 2009. 2010;<b>31</b>(4):319&ndash;26.</p></li><li><p>Meddings J, Saint S, Fowler KE, Gaies E, Hickner A, Krein SL, <I>et al</I>. The Ann Arbor criteria for appropriate urinary catheter use in hospitalized medical patients: results obtained by using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. <I>Ann Intern Med.</I> 2015;<b>162</b>(9 Suppl):S1&ndash;34.</p></li><li><p>Saint S, Greene MT, Krein SL, Rogers MA, Ratz D, Fowler KE, <I>et al</I>. A program to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection in acute care. <I>N Engl J Med.</I> 2016;<b>374</b>(22):2111&ndash;9.</p></li><li><p>Kowalik U, Plante MK. Urinary retention in surgical patients. <I>Surg Clin North Am.</I> 2016;<b>96</b>(3):453&ndash;67.</p></li><li><p>Loveday HP, Wilson JA, Pratt RJ, Golsorkhi M, Tingle A, Bak A, <I>et al</I>. epic3: national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England. <I>J Hosp Infect.</I> 2014;<b>86</b>(Suppl 1):S1&ndash;70.</p></li><li><p>Paiva-Santos F, Santos-Costa P, Bastos C, Graveto J. Nurses&rsquo; Adherence to the Portuguese Standard to Prevent Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTIs): an observational Study. <I>Nurs Rep.</I> 2023;<b>13</b>(4):1432&ndash;41.</p></li><li><p>Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, Damschroder LJ, Smith JL, Matthieu MM, <I>et al</I>. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. <I>Implementation Science</I> 2015;<b>10</b>(1):21.</p></li><li><p>Tyson AF, Campbell EF, Spangler LR, Ross SW, Reinke CE, Passaretti CL, <I>et al</I>. Implementation of a nurse-driven protocol for catheter removal to decrease catheter-associated urinary tract infection rate in a surgical trauma ICU. <I>J Intensive Care Med.</I> 2020;<b>35</b>(8):738&ndash;44.</p></li><li><p>Laan BJ, Maaskant JM, Spijkerman IJB, Borgert MJ, Godfried MH, Pasmooij BC, <I>et al</I>. De-implementation strategy to reduce inappropriate use of intravenous and urinary catheters (RICAT): a multicentre, prospective, interrupted time-series and before and after study. <I>Lancet Infect Dis.</I> 2020;<b>20</b>(7):864&ndash;72.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nollen, J.-M., Brunsveld-Reinders, A. H., Peul, W. C., Steyerberg, E. W., Furth, W. R. v.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.269</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.269</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[269 Improving postoperative catheter care in neurosurgery through standardized protocols: a multicentre before-and-after implementation study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A205</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A206</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A208?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[274 Integration of bone protection and anti-resorptive therapy in geriatric medicine services]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A208?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Elderly patients with fragility fractures present a significant challenge of geriatric medicine, accounting for increased morbidity and mortality. With growing emphasis on osteoporosis treatment management, the integration of bone protection and anti-resorptive therapy in geriatric medicine is increasingly assuming prominence. This current work compares the prescribing of Zoledronic acid, Denosumab, and Romosozumab to patients with fragility fracture and quantifies the effectiveness of an upgraded Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) model in resource-limited settings.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The Older People&rsquo;s Services (OPS) wards at Whipps Cross Hospital underwent a retrospective clinical audit. This audit was designed to ensure that 100% of inpatients, where bone protection therapy was not contraindicated, had initiated such therapy in line with NICE recommendations. The audit included inpatients aged &ge;65 years, excluding those already receiving bone protection therapy, those with end-stage renal failure, or those receiving palliative/end-of-life care.</p><p>The key metrics included were:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Multifactorial falls risk assessments (MFFAs) using FRAX/QFracture</p></li><li><p>Documentation of bone health reviews</p></li><li><p>Initiation of bone protection therapy</p></li></l></p><p>A series of Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were conducted, with data gathered at baseline on 14 April 2022. Re-audits were performed on 11 June, 1 August, and 1 September 2022. Educational interventions were implemented between cycles to increase compliance with the guidelines</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>  <b>At baseline</b>  </p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Only 2% of patients had an MFFA performed</p></li><li><p>4% had a bone health review</p></li><li><p>8% were initiated on bone protection therapy</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Following educational interventions</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>11 June 2022: MFFA completion rose to 71%, bone health reviews to 26.1%, and initiation of therapy to 7.6%</p></li><li><p>1 August 2022: MFFA completion rose to 74%, bone health reviews to 31%, and initiation of therapy to 41%</p></li><li><p>1 September 2022: Although MFFA completion decreased to 64.5%, bone health reviews increased to 52.6%</p></li></l></p><p>The educational interventions led to the improvement in falls risk assessment and management of bone health.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The integration of anti-resorptive therapies into geriatric services enhanced osteoporosis treatment and significantly narrowed the treatment gap in older individuals. Low compliance during the initial phase was overcome by the introduction of educational interventions, which resulted in a high completion rate of MFFAs, bone health reviews, and the initiation of bone protection therapy. Expanding bone health education to non-geriatric wards and addressing workforce limitations, such as the shortage of rheumatologists, could further enhance patient outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Quality statement 1: Assessment of fragility fracture risk | Osteoporosis | Quality standards | NICE</p></li><li><p><inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.nhfd.co.uk/20/NHFDCharts.nsf/Charts/KPIs?open?open&amp;org=WHC&amp;kpi=7</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p><inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/gid-ng10216/documents/final-scope</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Brook S, Todorov G, Comninos AN. 65 comparison of Frax and Qfracture in predicting fragility fractures in patients presenting with falls. <I>Age and Ageing</I> 2021;<b>50</b>(Supplement_1):i12&ndash;i42. Available at:<inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url"> https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab030.26. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/5242/smpc#gref</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Black DM, <I>et al</I>. Once-yearly zoledronic acid for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. <I>New England Journal of Medicine</I> 2007;<b>356</b>(18):1809&ndash;1822. Available at:<inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url"> https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa067312</inter-ref>.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roney, A., Hajinur, F., Agwada-Akeru, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.274</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.274</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[274 Integration of bone protection and anti-resorptive therapy in geriatric medicine services]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A208</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A209</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A209?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[275 Improving intravenous fluid and electrolyte prescription across two sites in a university hospital setting: how a unified IV prescription chart leads to safer prescribing practices]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A209?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><p>Intravenous fluids (IV) are a common hospital prescription which unfortunately is often done poorly without tailoring it to the patient it was intended for. IV fluid therapy comes with a myriad of risks if not appropriately prescribed with the commonest complication being fluid overload which can have potentially life-threatening respiratory complications.</p><p>The medical examiner and electronic mortality review process assessed the consequences of IV fluid prescription outside the NICE CG174 in adults, which may have contributed to the poor outcomes. The main points being outlined below:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Review of 20 patients with hypernatremia revealed prescription of 0.9% sodium chloride outside guidance in 17 cases.</p></li><li><p>IV fluids were being administered with substandard prescription. Repetitive prescription of &lsquo;8 hourly bags&rsquo; suggests therapy that is not tailored to individual patients.</p></li><li><p>Patients with decompensated liver disease and kidney failure suffered life- threatening respiratory complications when attempts were made to reverse renal impairment with IV fluids.</p></li><li><p>4 Different IV fluid prescription charts across the trust leads to no uniformity of prescription.</p></li></l></p><p>To address the following points a multidisciplinary IV fluid quality improvement team a was set up to create a pan trust IV fluid chart to aid improvement in prescriptions according to the National institution of clinical excellence guidelines (NICE) whilst allowing fluid therapy to be tailored to each patient and their co-morbidities.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>To create an easy-to-follow pan trust IV fluid chart to aid resident doctors and junior members of staff with prescription of IV fluids.</p></li><li><p>To decrease the amount of 0.9% sodium chloride used and to encourage the use of physiological IV fluids</p></li><li><p>To decrease the number of safety adverse events due to IV fluids</p></li><li><p>To ensure IV fluid prescription are compliant with NICE standards.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Methodology</st><p>Data was collected in 2 hospitals; 4 cycles of Data collection took places between February of 2021 to November 2024. All the available routes for prescription of IV fluids were reviewed. Data was collected on type of IV fluid prescribed, maintenance of an accurate fluid balance chart and prescription of fluid in accordance with the patient&rsquo;s height or weight. 4 different fluid charts were replaced with a pan-trust fluid prescription chart with dedicated sections for recusation, maintenance and replacement sections as well as a section for electrolyte corrections and free IV prescription. Each section contained guidelines on the indications of each type of fluid prescription, how to tailor the rate and volume to the patient&rsquo;s weight/height and co-morbidities. Once the pan-trust IV fluid chart was introduced 3 more data collection cycles took place collecting data on if IV fluid prescriptions were in accordance with the NICE guidelines.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>583 prescriptions were reviewed over 4 audit cycles.</p><p>The creation and implementation of a pan trust IV fluid prescription chart led to the following:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Statically significant reduction in off the guideline prescription of 0.9% sodium chloride from 13.65 (31/227) in cycle 1 to 1% (1/100) by cycle 4 (p&lt;0.001).</p></li><li><p>IV maintenance, resuscitation and replacement fluid have been prescribed according to the NICE standards 75.6% (90/119), 74.6% (53/71), 70.5% (36/51) of the time respectively.</p></li><li><p>Increased ease of prescription of IV fluid by introducing a reduced rate fluid prescription for frail patients/renal/cardiac disease, a choice of height or weight-based maintenance fluid prescription, IV fluid prescribing with preceding 24 hours fluid balance.</p></li><li><p>Conclusions and Learning Points</p></li><li><p>Involving wide team of doctors, nurses, pharmacists, practice educators, QI manager leads to a better understanding of areas that need improvement and implementation changes are wider understood and applied.</p></li><li><p>Going into depth to understand the problems from all available resources LERN, Medical Examiner leads to a better understanding on what issues need to be tackled.</p></li><li><p>A unified Chart according to NICE guidelines will lead to greater adherence to guidelines.</p></li><li><p>A unified chart with prescription guidance will allow trainee doctors and nurse practitioners greater confidence in prescribing IV fluids.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Lobo DN, <I>et al</I>. Problems with solutions: drowning in the brine of an inadequate knowledge base. <I>Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)</I> 2001;<b>20</b>(2):125&ndash;130. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1054/clnu.2000.0154.</p></li><li><p>Perez Nieto OR, <I>et al</I>. Aiming for zero fluid accumulation: first, do no harm. <I>Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy</I> 2021;<b>53</b>(2):162&ndash;178. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2021.105252</p></li><li><p>Recommendations: Intravenous fluid therapy in adults in hospital: Guidance (no date) NICE. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg174/chapter/Recommendations (Accessed: 21 February 2025).</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kiran, A., Tiwari, D., Usama, M., Thavanesan, K., Byrom, R., Giuseppe, D., Spake, C., Sims, J., Richter, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.275</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.275</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[275 Improving intravenous fluid and electrolyte prescription across two sites in a university hospital setting: how a unified IV prescription chart leads to safer prescribing practices]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A209</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A210</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A212?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[280 1 Acing IV Vancomycin prescription: a quality improvement project to increase the doctors compliance with the guidelines when prescribing IV Vancomycin]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A212?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Vancomycin is an antibiotic used in the Acute Medicine Department to target certain infections like MRSA. Nephrotoxicity is one of the critical adverse effects when using vancomycin, especially for patients above 65. The Dudley NHS Foundation Trust has a specific protocol for prescribing IV vancomycin to prevent adverse effects or suboptimal treatment. It has been witnessed in the Acute Medicine Department that the prescription of intravenous vancomycin is inconsistent with the guidelines, which might result in detrimental effects on the patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim</st><p>Our project aims to enhance the Acute Medicine Department&rsquo;s practice in terms of adhering to the IV vancomycin prescription guidelines, thus improving the patients&rsquo; safety and preventing complications.</p></sec><sec><st>Context</st><p>The project was conducted in the Acute Medicine Department at the Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom. The study examined doctors&rsquo; prescriptions, and to achieve that our work was addressed toward doctors, nurses, and pharmacists.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods (assessment of the problem)</st><p>Retrospective electronic data for eligible patients between March and August 2023 were collected and examined according to the guidelines: whether the loading dose was given when there were no contraindications according to the weight. Whether the maintenance dose was given, and if the CrCl was calculated. Was the vancomycin predose and trough levels sent, and was the dose adjusted accordingly?</p><p>The results found were variable with a massive room for improvement in all stages of the guidelines. On top of them prescribing the maintenance dose according to the CrCL, which achieved 27%, and adjusting the dose according to vancomycin levels was done at 48%.</p><p>These low rates could be attributed to the busy work environment in the AMU as doctors find it challenging to read through the whole guidelines. In addition, new doctors join the department continuously without having introductory sessions on this antibiotic. Another possible cause is having so many bedridden patients on AMU, making it difficult to weigh. Hence, the doctors might estimate the weight, however, without documentation. The department was made aware of the problem through presentations and emails.</p><p>Intervention and strategy for change:</p><p>To increase the prescriber&rsquo;s compliance with the protocol posters with the guidelines were attached in all AMU wards, in addition to the emails and presentations.</p><p>Moreover, we involved other teams that could assist in the process of change implementation, like the pharmacists and the nurses. The pharmacist agreed to integrate an informative teaching session with the AMU staff like the one held for foundation doctors, so we can introduce the protocol to the newly joined doctors. Nurses were advised to remind doctors to review the vancomycin levels, and to use bed scales for weighing bedridden patients.</p><p>Strategy for change:</p><p>After completing the first cycle and introducing the issue to the team through emails and presentations in October 2023, we attached the posters and implemented the multidisciplinary team approach throughout the period from October until July 2024, when we completed the project. We received great feedback from the team and received great suggestions like the bed scales.</p><p>Measurement of improvement:</p><p>After taking the actions, the data was collected retrospectively in the time frame during which we applied the actions and analyzed them into graphs between October 2023 and July 2024. We were able to enhance the prescriptions in crucial steps. Prescribing the maintenance dose was increased from 94% to 100%. Calculating the CrCl has improved from 27% to 53%. Sending vancomycin trough levels increased from 76% to 85%, and adjusting the levels accordingly increased from 48% to 71%.</p><p>Effects of change:</p><p>We improved critical steps of the vancomycin prescription, ultimately improving patients&rsquo; safety and decreasing the risk of nephrotoxicity.</p><p>Not documenting estimated weight was one of the issues, to overcome that we advised our colleagues to document and use bed scales.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Albastaki, E., Saeed, A., Khan, A., Shaikh, M., Khan, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.280</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.280</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[280 1 Acing IV Vancomycin prescription: a quality improvement project to increase the doctors compliance with the guidelines when prescribing IV Vancomycin]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A212</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A212</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A213?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Author index]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A213?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><p>Abbas Natasha, <A HREF="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A129.abstract">175</inter-ref></p><p>Abdalgadir Amgad, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A14.abstract" locator-type="url">21</inter-ref></p><p>Abdallah Ramsey, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A179.1.abstract" locator-type="url">238</inter-ref></p><p>Abdelhamid R, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A1.1.abstract" locator-type="url">1</inter-ref></p><p>Abdelkader Ahmed, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A196.2.abstract" locator-type="url">260</inter-ref></p><p>Abdullah Syed, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A68.2.abstract" locator-type="url">94</inter-ref></p><p>Abdullah Yusuf, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A116.2.abstract" locator-type="url">158</inter-ref></p><p>Aboueldahab Kheloud, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A12.2.abstract" locator-type="url">17</inter-ref>, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A32.2.abstract" locator-type="url">48</inter-ref></p><p>Acharya Siddhartha, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A77.abstract" locator-type="url">106</inter-ref></p><p>Adam R, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A1.1.abstract" locator-type="url">1</inter-ref></p><p>Addy C, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A20.3.abstract" locator-type="url">30</inter-ref></p><p>Adkins G, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A5.1.abstract" locator-type="url">6</inter-ref></p><p>Aerts Joachim GJV, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A6.1.abstract" locator-type="url">8</inter-ref></p><p>Afreen Safina, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A26.1.abstract" locator-type="url">39</inter-ref></p><p>Agrawal Jaya, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A51.1.abstract" locator-type="url">68</inter-ref></p><p>Agwada-Akeru Judith, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A208.abstract" locator-type="url">274</inter-ref></p><p>Ahmad Moeed, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A32.1.abstract" locator-type="url">47</inter-ref></p><p>Ahmed Aisha, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A26.1.abstract" locator-type="url">39</inter-ref></p><p>Ahmed Mohamed Abdelraheem, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A14.abstract" locator-type="url">21</inter-ref></p><p>Ahmed MT, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A97.1.abstract" locator-type="url">129</inter-ref></p><p>Ahmed Muhammad, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A88.abstract" locator-type="url">119</inter-ref></p><p>Ahmed Sahed, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A142.2.abstract" locator-type="url">194</inter-ref></p><p>Ahmed Shiraz, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A88.abstract" locator-type="url">119</inter-ref></p><p>Ajitsaria Richa, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A22.2.abstract" locator-type="url">33</inter-ref></p><p>Akanbi Omotoyosi, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A176.1.abstract" locator-type="url">235</inter-ref></p><p>Akeru J, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A97.1.abstract" locator-type="url">129</inter-ref></p><p>Akrouh Nada, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A5.2.abstract" locator-type="url">7</inter-ref></p><p>Al-Awamer Ahmed, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A185.2.abstract" locator-type="url">247</inter-ref></p><p>Al-Hammad Muhammad Firas, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A147.abstract" locator-type="url">198</inter-ref></p><p>Al-Kalbani Salma Rashid, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A156.1.abstract" locator-type="url">207</inter-ref>, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A199.1.abstract" locator-type="url">263</inter-ref></p><p>Al-Lawati Anwaar, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A156.1.abstract" locator-type="url">207</inter-ref>, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A199.1.abstract" locator-type="url">263</inter-ref></p><p>Al-Mudhaffar M, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A20.3.abstract" locator-type="url">30</inter-ref></p><p>Alapati A, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A52.1.abstract" locator-type="url">70</inter-ref></p><p>AlAttal Zakaria, <inter-ref locator="https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/Suppl_3/A35.abstract" locator-type="url">51</A>,...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.authorindex</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.authorindex</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Author index]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A213</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A218</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A174-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[234 An inclusive approach to the preanesthetic interview: consensus development of the perioperative gender diverse assessment tool (PDGAT)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A174-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Approximately 25 million people across the globe identify as transgender.<sup>1</sup> As more transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals seek gender-affirming care, healthcare professionals are increasingly likely to encounter them in the perioperative setting. Many TGD patients express dissatisfaction with their care, while numerous healthcare professionals report feeling inadequately prepared to effectively care for this population.</p><p>Anesthesiology professionals, much like other perioperative team members, often meet patients for the first time on the day of surgery. Therefore, their initial interactions are crucial in building trust and alleviating anxiety, as patients who trust their providers are more likely to share important information with them. However, inadequate collection of a patient&rsquo;s medical history and preferences during the preanesthetic assessment compromises the quality and safety of perioperative care.<sup>2,3</sup>  </p><p>The World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) Standards of Care (SOC) 8 emphasize the need for accessible resources to enable providers to deliver inclusive care to all patients.<sup>4</sup> However, many hospital systems still do not offer these essential resources.<sup>5</sup> Further, there is currently no formally established evidence-based preanesthetic assessment tool tailored to TGD health. This study aimed to develop an evidence-based perioperative assessment tool for anesthesiology professionals that addresses the unique health needs of TGD patients to enhance the perioperative experience.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Using a modified Delphi design, a consensus-based Perioperative Gender-Diverse Assessment Tool (PGDAT) was developed to assist anesthesiology professionals in sensitively engaging with TGD patients and creating evidenced informed, individualized anesthetic plans. Fourteen expert panelists from across the United States appraised the quality and clinical readiness of the PGDAT through a series of iterative online surveys according to the Mini-Checklist, a validated instrument known for its high interrater reliability (<I>ICC</I> = 0.755; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.001) in evaluating methodological guideline quality.<sup>6</sup> Consensus was defined as 0.8 agreement among raters, inter-rater reliability was analyzed using Gwet&rsquo;s AC2, and a thematic analysis was conducted following Braun and Clarke methodologies.<sup>7</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Three core themes emerged that supported further PGDAT enhancements, and Gwet&rsquo;s AC2 was 0.75707 and 0.83977. The 0.8 consensus threshold was reached after two survey rounds, which content-validated the PGDAT and established an evidence-based resource that future research opportunities can use to bring about organizational changes that promote safe and inclusive healthcare environments for all.</p></sec><sec><st>Discussion</st><p>The evidence surrounding the development of a perioperative assessment tool for TGD patients is continuously evolving. Key lessons learned include the importance of stakeholder engagement, particularly with TGD patients and researchers in the field. Integrating the PGDAT into anesthesiology practice and EHR systems is the next phase to ensure its validation and further enhance the tool as our understanding of TGD patient needs evolves. Its implementation may improve patient outcomes through cultural humility, reducing anxiety, preventing misgendering, and ensuring appropriate medical management. For the healthcare system, it may reduce potential complications and contribute to promoting inclusive, patient-centered care.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Tollinche LE, Rosa WE, van Rooyen CD. Perioperative considerations for person-centered gender-affirming surgery. <I>Adv Anesth.</I> 2021;<b>39</b>:77&ndash;96. doi:10.1016/j.aan.2021.07.005</p></li><li><p>Tylee MJ, Rubenfeld GD, Wijeysundera D, Sklar MC, Hussain S, Adhikari NKJ. Anesthesiologist to patient communication. <I>JAMA Netw Open</I>. 2020;<b>3</b>(11):e2023503. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.23503</p></li><li><p>Barrow E, Lear RA, Morbi A, Long S, Darzi A, Mayer E, Archer S. How do hospital inpatients conceptualise patient safety? A qualitative interview study using constructivist grounded theory. <I>BMJ Qual Saf</I>. 2023;<b>32</b>(7):383&ndash;393. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2022-014695</p></li><li><p>Coleman E, Radix AE, Bouman WP, et al. Standards of care for the health of transgender and gender diverse people, Version 8. <I>Int J Transgend Health</I>. 2022;<b>23</b>(suppl 1):S1&ndash;S259. doi:10.1080/26895269.2022.2100644</p></li><li><p>Dolan IJ, Strauss P, Winter S, Lin A. Misgendering and experiences of stigma in health care settings for transgender people. <I>Med J Aus</I>. 2020;<b>212</b>(4):150&ndash;151.e1. doi:10.5694/mja2.50497</p></li><li><p>Siebenhofer A, Semlitsch T, Herborn T, Siering U, Kopp I, Hartig J. Validation and reliability of a guideline appraisal mini-checklist for daily practice use. <I>BMC Med Res Methodol.</I> 2016;<b>16</b>(1):39. doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0139-x</p></li><li><p>Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. <I>Qual Res Psychol</I>. 2006;<b>3</b>(2):77&ndash;101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dolan, C., Gallant, K., Pelt, M. v., Aquino, N. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.234</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.234</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[234 An inclusive approach to the preanesthetic interview: consensus development of the perioperative gender diverse assessment tool (PDGAT)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A174</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A175</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A176-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[235 Developing a consensus for healthcare safety investigator competencies: an e-Delphi study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A176-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Healthcare safety is a crucial aspect of patient care with evidence of avoidable patient injury occurring in advanced and developing healthcare systems.<sup>1</sup> Healthcare safety incidents are undesirable. They can, however, offer valuable opportunities for learning and improvement. One of the key strategies for enhancing patient safety is investigating healthcare safety incidents to prevent future occurrences.<sup>2</sup>Healthcare Safety Investigators (HSIs) play a vital role in conducting these investigations; identifying contextual and contributory factors, sharing findings, making recommendations and suggesting safety actions to improve systems and practices within the healthcare domain.</p><p>The scope of healthcare safety investigations suggests the need for a blend of investigative, analytical, and, interpersonal skills such as empathy and compassion. To ascertain that HSIs possess these skills, establishing a common set of competencies is essential to address gaps in knowledge and guide standardised educational content for their training. However, current literature reveals no agreed-upon competencies for HSIs. The Health Services Safety Investigations Body (HSSIB) Education Team initiated efforts to develop a proposed set of competencies. This study aimed to develop a consensus on the relevance of these proposed competencies for HSIs working in England.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>A two-round web-based Delphi expert consensus method was used to identify requisite competencies for HSIs. The surveys were administered using REDCap, a secure web-based platform.<sup>3,4</sup> Experts were defined as individuals with relevant experience in systems-based healthcare safety investigations.</p><p>The round-one survey was developed from data collected for a separate study involving interviews with 50 safety specialists, focusing on qualities essential for effective investigations. From these interviews, 40 competence statements were generated, categorised into four domains. Descriptors for these statements were developed to describe elements of the relevant competence. Participants rated the relevance of each descriptor on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly irrelevant; 5 = strongly relevant) and provided qualitative feedback. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics; median, interquartile ranges (IQRs), and percentage agreement for each descriptor. To establish consensus, a descriptor needed to have: a median score of &ge;4, an IQR of &le;1.25, and &ge;70% agreement among participants. Competency statements and descriptors were refined, informed by participants&rsquo; qualitative comments and reference to contemporary healthcare safety literature and practice. This combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches ensured a comprehensive evaluation of the data.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Twenty-eight participants completed the round-one survey. The round-two survey asked participants to re-rate items that did not reach consensus from round-one. Twenty-four participants completed the round-two survey. At the end of the study, consensus was achieved on 38 competence statements and 85 individual descriptors. See <cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>. Together, these reflect the complexity of conducting effective healthcare safety investigations.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 235 Table 1</no><caption><p>List of final competencies</p></caption><tblbdy><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1">  <b>Domain One: Personal Qualities</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1">  <b>Inherent Characteristics</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Is empathic </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Is inquisitive </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Is rigorous </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1">  <b>Professional identity</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Demonstrates knowledge in healthcare safety investigations </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Invests in personal professional development </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Supports knowledge development in investigation practice </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Is perceived as a credible professional. </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">8 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Actively promotes team-working. </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1">  <b>Ethical practice</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Responds to reflection of own expertise and experiences. </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Is sensitive and responsive to the needs of investigation participants. </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">11 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Seeks and offers peer review. </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">12 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Demonstrates independence </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">13 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Maintains confidentiality. </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">14 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Demonstrates integrity. </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">15 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Demonstrates diplomacy </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1">  <b>Domain Two: Investigation knowledge and skill application</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1">  <b>Investigation knowledge</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">16 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of the investigation context </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of complex healthcare systems </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">18 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of principles core to a healthcare safety investigation </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">19 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of principles of engagement and involvement </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">20 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of principles of restorative just culture </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1">  <b>Investigation practice</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">21 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Demonstrates applied skills as an investigator to plan, prepare and review the design of an investigation </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">22 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Demonstrates skills as an investigator to use system-based investigation methodologies. </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">23 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Demonstrates applied skills as an investigator to use investigation methods and techniques </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">24 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Demonstrates skills as an investigator to collect investigation data </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">25 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Demonstrates skills as an investigator to analyse and interpret data </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">26 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Demonstrates skills as an investigator to identify areas for system improvement. </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">27 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Demonstrates skills as an investigator to report the investigation </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">28 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Demonstrates skills as an investigator to assure quality of investigation integrity </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1">  <b> Domain Three: Effective and compassionate engagement</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1">  <b>Being supportive of people involved in an investigation</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">29 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Demonstrates insight into the experience of others </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">30 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Prepares for engagement and involvement </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">31 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Engages intentionally and genuinely with people </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1">  <b>Promotes engagement through interview practice</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">32 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Prepares and supports interviewees </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">33 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Conducts the interview </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1">  <b>Writes for the audience</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">34 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Tailors content for the user </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1">  <b>Domain Four: Manages investigation lifecycle</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">35 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Identifies opportunities to learn from completed investigations </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">36 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Uses agreed processes. </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">37 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Schedules work and manages time </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">38 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Manages data </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Discussion</st><p>The set of competencies for HSIs represent the first of its kind, globally. To ensure that healthcare safety investigations are impactful, investigators must possess a blend of technical knowledge and expertise,<sup>5</sup> communication and interpersonal skills,<sup>6,7</sup> ethical and behavioural competencies,<sup>8</sup> adaptability to various situations,<sup>9</sup> and a commitment to continuous learning.<sup>10</sup> The proposed competencies and descriptors from this study comprehensively cover these critical areas.</p><p>This set of competencies can provide a foundation for establishing professional standards for healthcare safety investigators. It can also offer a framework for quality assurance in recruitment, performance appraisal, and identifying knowledge, experience, and capability gaps. Further efforts to standardize and develop assessments for these competencies during the education and training of healthcare safety investigators would be highly beneficial.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Organization WH. Patient Safety; WHO Factsheet 2023. 2023.</p></li><li><p>England N. Patient Safety Incident Response Framework. Version 1 ed. London: NHS England; 2022. p. 1&ndash;13.</p></li><li><p>Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)&mdash;A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. <I>Journal of Biomedical Informatics</I> 2009;<b>42</b>(2):377&ndash;81.</p></li><li><p>Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O&rsquo;Neal L, <I>et al</I>. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. <I>Journal of Biomedical Informatics</I> 2019;<b>95</b>:103208-.</p></li><li><p>Chang S-H, Chen D-F, Wu T-C. Developing a competency model for safety professionals: Correlations between competency and safety functions. <I>Journal of Safety Research</I> 2012;<b>43</b>(5&ndash;6):339&ndash;50.</p></li><li><p>Nixon J, Braithwaite RG. What do aircraft accident investigators do and what makes them good at it? Developing a competency framework for investigators using grounded theory. <I>Safety Science</I> 2018;<b>103</b>:153&ndash;61.</p></li><li><p>Daud R, Ismail M, Omar Z. Identification of competencies for malaysian occupational safety and health professionals. <I>Industrial Health</I> 2010;<b>48</b>(6):824&ndash;34.</p></li><li><p>Provan DJ, Rae AJ, Dekker SWA. An ethnography of the safety professional&rsquo;s dilemma: Safety work or the safety of work? <I>Safety Science</I> 2019;<b>117</b>:276&ndash;89.</p></li><li><p>Ishimaru T, Punpeng T, Maiyapakdee C, Ketsakorn A, Fujino Y, Hara K. Survey of the necessary competencies and proficiency of safety officers in Thailand. <I>Industrial Health</I> 2020;<b>58</b>(5):403&ndash;13.</p></li><li><p>Christodoulou J. Competency and continuing professional development for safety and reliability professionals: an overview. <I>Safety &amp; Reliability</I> 2014;<b>34</b>(3):5&ndash;17.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akanbi, O., Hide, S., Murphy-Pittock, A., Lim, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.235</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.235</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[235 Developing a consensus for healthcare safety investigator competencies: an e-Delphi study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A176</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A176</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A176-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[236 SCOPE-KIDS: feasibility study of a collaborative care model for delivering youth urgent mental health care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A176-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>In Ontario, Canada, a significant proportion of youth reported mental health challenges in 2019, with nearly 25% experiencing moderate to severe anxiety or depression and almost 20% seriously considering suicide. The COVID-19 pandemic further exacerbated these issues, leading to a 10&ndash;15% increase in mental health service utilization and consequent increases in wait times for child/adolescent mental health services. Service gaps widened, and primary care physicians often had limited knowledge of available resources, while access to allied health supports was restricted for those not affiliated with family health teams.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>To address these challenges, the SCOPE-KIDS pathway was developed as a joint quality improvement initiative between the Sunnybrook Department of Psychiatry and the North Toronto Ontario Health Team. The initiative aimed to expand mental health service delivery and navigation for children and youth. The development and implementation of SCOPE-KIDS took place over one year and involved multiple external stakeholders, including PCPs, child/adolescent psychiatrists, administrative leaders, QI experts, navigational experts, and a patient/family advisory group. The formation of the initiative was guided by Kotter&rsquo;s framework in leading change. The SCOPE-KIDS team identified four primary goals: (a) improving time to access SCOPE KIDS service, (b) reducing time to physician-based mental health assessments to less than 4 weeks; (c) providing measurement based care; and (d) providing appropriate follow up matched to patient&rsquo;s disease severity.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>After 20 months, SCOPE-KIDS handled a total of 115 mental health referrals, all received through a mental health navigator and triaged appropriately. Services provided included direct psychiatric consultations, MD-to-MD (indirect) consultations, social work consultations, and community system/resource navigation. 68 out of 115 referrals involved psychiatric consultations by adolescent psychiatrists, and the vast majority of cases (99 out of 115) were based in the City of Toronto. 55 unique PCPs utilized the service, with an average time from referral to first contact of 3 days. Where requested, 79% of cases consulted with a social worker within 1 week of referral and 77% with a psychiatrist within 1 month. The average age of clients referred was 13.3 years. Around 62% of psychiatric consults included a diagnosed anxiety disorder, 34% had an attention or learning disorder, 24% a mood disorder, and 8% a neurodevelopmental disorder like ASD. Few follow-ups were needed beyond the initial consultation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The interventions implemented through the SCOPE-KIDS pathway highlight the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration and the need for accessible mental health resources for youth with limited wait times. The successful implementation of this model in one community suggests that other healthcare settings and teams can replicate it to begin bridging service gaps and meeting the rising mental health needs of youth in their communities.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, K., Song, J., Riggin, L., Lewis, Z., Pokroy, R., Shedletsky, S., Pang, K., Liu, K., Steinberg, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.236</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.236</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[236 SCOPE-KIDS: feasibility study of a collaborative care model for delivering youth urgent mental health care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A176</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A177</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A179-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[238 A health systems framework and lessons learned for screening for depression across a large multi-specialty medical group]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A179-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Northwell Health identified mental health as a key imperative, necessitating improved depression screening in its ambulatory network. Key practice changes included expanding screening beyond primary care to specialty clinics, implementing standardized protocols, and providing staff with clear guidance on follow-up actions for positive screenings.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Changes were implemented through the Ambulatory Quality Improvement Collaborative (AQIC), with a structured approach for reproducibility:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>  <I>Universal Screening:</I> Implemented annually using the PHQ-2 tool in all specialty and primary care settings. Specialty clinics, such as cardiology, dermatology, and OB/GYN, incorporated this screening into patient check-ins.</p></li><li><p>  <I>Workflow Standardization:</I> Medical assistants conducted initial PHQ-2 screenings; positive cases were escalated to physicians or APPs for follow-up PHQ-9 assessments or direct discussion.</p></li><li><p>  <I>Training and Education:</I> Clinical staff received training on administering the PHQ-2 and interpreting results, focusing on technical aspects of data entry in the EHR and compassionate patient communication.</p></li><li><p>  <I>Referral and Follow-Up:</I> Defined referral processes for positive screenings directed patients to primary care, behavioral health providers, or Northwell&rsquo;s Behavioral Health Navigation program.</p></li><li><p>  <I>Data Monitoring:</I> AQIC developed a centralized dashboard to track screening rates, stratified by clinic for targeted support.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Universal depression screening was rolled out in phases. The pilot phase in select clinics refined workflows and developed support materials. Subsequent expansions involved high-volume specialties like cardiology and orthopedics, with on-site training sessions. System-wide implementation ensured that all ambulatory facilities conducted routine screenings by year-end. By the campaign&rsquo;s completion, 72% of offices attested to completing the training, covering over 1,300 individuals. The initial baseline of 27.5% performance set the stage for 2024 targets: a system threshold of 32.5%, a performance goal of 37.5%, and a stretch goal of 39.5%. Monthly performance data is summarized in <cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 238 Table 1</no><caption><p>System level depression screening performance data</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Jan</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Feb</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Mar</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Apr</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>May</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Jun</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Jul</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Aug</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Sep</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Oct</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Nov</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Dec</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="12" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">25.2% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">25.1% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">28.2% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">29.2% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">29.8% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">30.6% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">32.0% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">33.9% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">35.6% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">37.8% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">39.9% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">41.4% </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Frontline staff engagement was vital for effective dissemination, with implementation champions facilitating training and supporting resources like guides and webinars. Communication through town halls and departmental meetings aligned staff with project goals. Lessons include early staff engagement in specialties not traditionally involved in mental health. Streamlined workflows and stigma-free communication framed depression screening as routine care, enhancing patient comfort and engagement. Universal depression screening normalized mental health discussions across Northwell Health&rsquo;s network, highlighting the importance of leadership, prioritization, and addressing frontline concerns to minimize resistance.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abdallah, R., Dolinski, C., Rizzuto, A., Jagrooph, T., Eisenberg, J., Beran, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.238</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.238</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[238 A health systems framework and lessons learned for screening for depression across a large multi-specialty medical group]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A179</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A179</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A179-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[239 Designing for interaction and implementation: an applied case study using the 3D framework to improve quality and safety in digital health]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A179-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Clinical decision support tools to improve patient safety can be designed better for human technology interaction and implementation. There remains a paucity of methodological research about how we can best design for the adoption of new digital health technologies in clinical practice, such as algorithm-driven clinical decision support system (CDSS) tools. This includes how to implement design principles prior to and during formative implementation science evaluations, and to allow integrative tests of CDSS tools to minimise failure events. Our study aimed to demonstrate the use of the Design-Develop-Decide (3D) framework,<sup>1</sup> addressing the transdisciplinary research gap in the convergence of design thinking and implementation, particularly in early-stage translation research for health settings.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A three-phase observational study was utilised to evaluate the implementation of a pilot case study of a clinical AI tool for detecting sepsis risk in the emergency department waiting room. Direct observations, surveys and Think Aloud usability testing experiments were included as part of the formative evaluation. We used the framework to evaluate 1) the design elements for improving the visualisation tool used for sepsis risk and 2) to contextualise our understanding of &lsquo;how&rsquo;, &lsquo;who&rsquo; and &lsquo;why&rsquo; piloted implementation strategies would facilitate and encourage the use of the tool in clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Clinical staff as users showed a preference for a tool that would allow some individualisation such as sorting tool tips, display of sepsis risk in a traffic light system. Users reported that the design changes improved usability of the tool for the clinical tasks of identifying patients for further testing and during a shift change or handover. A sense of play was discovered when users could test the tool responsiveness with their clinical processes.</p><p>We propose the 3D framework<sup>1</sup> could be used to facilitate evaluations that allow discovery of factors that will influence clinical utility, safety, and quality of human-computer interaction within a cultural context. Our case study found that sensemaking of potential facilitators or barriers to implementation were improved by introducing user-centred design methodologies into digital health implementation projects (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>).</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 239 Figure 1</no><link locator="239_F1"></fig></p><p>The Design-Develop-Decide(3D) Framework, consisting of three cycles of data collection and synthesis to support the stage of design of the intervention, development of the service, and decisions on implementation.</p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Gough P, Shetty A, Wang AP. Design-develop-decide: a framework for user and implementation evaluation in digital health. <I>Research Square</I> 2024. doi: 10.21203</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gough, P., Shetty, A., Shah, U., Wang, A. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.239</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.239</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[239 Designing for interaction and implementation: an applied case study using the 3D framework to improve quality and safety in digital health]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A179</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A180</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A184-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[244 X-ray vision: a quality improvement project aiming to minimise unnecessary chest X-rays for children in our childrens emergency department]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A184-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Children&rsquo;s Emergency Departments (CEDs) in the UK are under increasing pressure due to high patient volumes and reduced staffing, requiring improvements in efficiency while maintaining high-quality care. Unnecessary investigations, such as chest X-rays (CXRs), contribute to departmental crowding, increased waiting times, and expose children to avoidable radiation. These investigations also add to healthcare costs and place additional burdens on families and the NHS. This project aimed to optimise workflow and enhance patient safety by reducing unnecessary CXRs through targeted quality improvement (QI) interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>A diagnostic phase was undertaken to understand the drivers of unnecessary CXR use. A process map was created to visualise inefficiencies, and a fishbone diagram was used to identify contributing factors. Baseline data, represented in a bar chart, revealed that half of all CXRs performed did not align with national guidelines.</p><p>A SMART aim was set to reduce unnecessary CXRs in our department from one in two to fewer than one in five by June 2024. The primary measure was the proportion of appropriate versus unnecessary CXRs. Data collection was conducted using defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, with ongoing sampling supported by radiology data analysts. </p><p>A run chart with a median baseline was used to track variation and identify statistically significant changes. Using the Model for Improvement&rsquo;s Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle, several targeted interventions were implemented including:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Regular Education Bulletins &ndash; Provided staff with clear, accessible guidance on national recommendations.</p></li><li><p>Project Progress Updates &ndash; Maintained staff engagement and reinforced key messages.</p></li><li><p>Chest X-ray National Guidance Game with Leaderboard &ndash; Used gamification to encourage adherence to best practices.</p></li></l></p><p>All PDSA cycles were documented in a summary table to facilitate future adoption.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>After four PDSA cycles, the SMART aim was achieved, with unnecessary CXRs reduced from one in two to fewer than one in five by June 2024. By project completion, only one in ten CXRs was deemed unnecessary. Statistically significant improvement was confirmed by more than six consecutive data points below the baseline median on the run chart.</p><p>Challenges included survey fatigue, leading to lower-than-expected response rates. However, face-to-face discussions proved valuable in engaging staff, providing deeper insights, and fostering collaborative problem-solving.</p><p>This QI project successfully reduced unnecessary CXRs in our CED through a combination of diagnostic analysis, PDSA-driven interventions, and staff engagement strategies. The interventions were low-cost and easily reproducible. Future work will focus on sustaining these improvements and scaling the approach to other departments.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dastur Mackenzie, F., James, D., Davey, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.244</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.244</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[244 X-ray vision: a quality improvement project aiming to minimise unnecessary chest X-rays for children in our childrens emergency department]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A184</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A184</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A184-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[245 Virtual care: a key element in primary care for all, transitioning from pilot phase to integration into health home and neighbourhood]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A184-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><p>Nova Scotia has long struggled with primary care access due to provider shortages, population growth, and rising chronic disease rates. At its peak, over 160,000 residents lacked a primary care provider.</p><p>A case study examined the use of implementation science and a &lsquo;test and try&rsquo; approach in launching and expanding VirtualCareNS. Quality improvement methods helped integrate the program into a broader network of primary health care services, measuring its impact and return on investments.</p><p>Since its launch, nearly 125,000 Nova Scotians have registered for VirtualCareNS, with usage increasing through full-scale implementation to the current average of 13,400 monthly visits. Of those, 94.6% of care needs were met, and 56% of users reported avoiding an emergency room visit&mdash;preventing 48,558 emergency department visits and saving $43.58 million annually through cost avoidance. Patient satisfaction remains high at 85%. </p><p>Challenges include managing demand, provider availability, and integrating with clinical systems. Future efforts will focus on expanding capacity, optimizing technology, and aligning VirtualCareNS with provincial health transformation initiatives.</p><p>The use of implementation science and quality improvement has successfully positioned VirtualCareNS as a key part of Nova Scotia&rsquo;s primary care system, improving access to primary care, and reducing emergency department visits. This case study provides valuable insights for health system leaders, policymakers, and quality improvement practitioners looking to implement or scale virtual primary care initiatives.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Whelan, N., Joudrey, C. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.245</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.245</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[245 Virtual care: a key element in primary care for all, transitioning from pilot phase to integration into health home and neighbourhood]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A184</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A184</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A185-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[246 Aiming high: a large-scale quality improvement project in a national specialist rehabilitation unit]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A185-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Ireland&rsquo;s Highfield Healthcare is one of only two sites nationally providing specialist inpatient mental health rehabilitation for those with severe and enduring mental illness and significant functional impairment. In 2021 as a service running for three years, there was a need to review our strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and challenges.</p><p>The UK&rsquo;s <I>RCPsych AIMS Rehab,</I> developed by the Royal College of Psychiatrists Quality Network, sets out a comprehensive set of standards in line with international best practice and expert consensus for mental health rehabilitation services. We chose this as a tool to shape and drive change.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>People and Culture within our organisation were identified as a key focus to drive change. Motivating colleagues and creating &lsquo;buy-in&rsquo; through a shared purpose and collective leadership was identified as key to effect and sustain change.</p><p>A core steering group was formed and the multidisciplinary team (MDT) was split into five workstreams which each focussed on one core domain, namely: unit environment; admission, leave and discharge; care and treatment; staffing; and service management</p><p>Service user engagement was prioritised and was facilitated via a weekly forum to ensure change was person-centred and meaningfully co-produced. Formal feedback from service users and their families was obtained through structured questionnaires provided by <I>RCPsych AIMS Rehab</I>.</p><p>Change initiatives were underpinned by policies, written procedures and meeting minutes, and steering group members joined the policy committee and organisational management meetings.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Quality improvement highlights include:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>The role of the Keyworker was enhanced, including regular 1:1 sessions, defining keyworker involvement in MDT, and proactive family engagement</p></li><li><p>The physical environment of the unit was redeveloped, including murals and paintings co-produced by service users and a wallchart with staff names and photos</p></li><li><p>Clear channels for service user and carer feedback were defined</p></li><li><p>Our Service User Admission Booklet was redesigned, and included information about the MDT, care plans, key workers and daily routine</p></li><li><p>A Therapeutic Programme Booklet was developed to provide service users with an overview of the care provided in the SRU</p></li><li><p>Our risk assessment process was updated</p></li></l></p><p>Highfield SRU successfully achieved the necessary quality standards set out by <I>RCPsych AIMS Rehab</I>. Associate membership and a Certificate for Commitment to Quality Improvement was awarded. Various team members are now on the <I>RCPsych AIMS Rehab</I> Accreditation Committee, peer reviewing other units, and the Standard Advisory Group. The team has presented at the Quality Forum for three consecutive years.</p><p>Service users can have confidence in receiving quality, evidence-based care in which their own engagement and feedback is paramount.</p><p>Team building and a culture of learning and continuous quality improvement has been fostered. There is a wider sense of shared purpose through our team&rsquo;s membership of an international network of quality rehabilitation services.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamill, R., Bowe, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.246</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.246</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[246 Aiming high: a large-scale quality improvement project in a national specialist rehabilitation unit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A185</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A185</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A185-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[247 Breaking barriers to speaking up for safety: a leadership toolkit to foster a culture of communication openness]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A185-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Appropriate and timely communication between healthcare professionals is required to effectively respond to patient care concerns. Ineffective communication of care concerns can result in delayed diagnosis and treatment, or the inability to rescue a patient from a deteriorating condition (Johnston et al., 2015). Despite the recognition of its importance, there remains multiple barriers preventing communication openness between healthcare professionals. An organization&rsquo;s safety culture is one large factor that can hinder or support effective communication. Further, healthcare leaders have a crucial role in influencing safety culture (Pozzobon et al., 2024).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim</st><p>At our large multi-site academic health sciences centre in Canada, we identified an opportunity to improve communication openness following a review of the results from an organization-wide safety culture survey (using the Agency for Healthcare Research &amp; Quality (AHRQ 2021) safety culture survey) conducted in Fall 2023. We aimed to improve the scores on the communication openness domain of the survey. Recognizing leaders are key influencers in the development of a culture supportive of communication openness, we co-designated a toolkit reflective of best leadership practices to improve communication openness. This intervention aligns with our organization&rsquo;s strategy and executive goals to deliver high quality care improving patient outcomes and experiences.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>To develop the toolkit, a multi-disciplinary team was struck and was composed of leaders spanning the enterprise, a patient partner and experts in patient safety. The team decided to meet with those clinical leaders who have oversight of clinical areas that scored well on the communication openness domain of the safety culture survey, and those who have the greatest opportunity for improvement to inform the toolkit contents. Further, a review of the literature identified key leadership practices to support communication openness.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The interviews and literature informed the development of a toolkit with three parts. Part one is a leadership self-assessment where leaders assess themselves on six domains using pre-determined questions. Part two provides resources and tools aligned with each of the six domains. Leaders are encouraged to select resources and tools aligned with the domain(s) where they have the greatest opportunity for improvement identified in part one. In part three, leaders are asked to develop an action plan using a template to improve communication openness and are encouraged to incorporate the tools and resources from part two. The toolkit was launched in Fall 2024. To support implementation, the organizations&rsquo; quality governance structures was leveraged. To evaluate the effectiveness of the toolkit, optional pulse surveys using the communication openness questions are underway and the organization wide safety culture survey will be repeated in 2025.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Agency for Healthcare Research. (2021). <I>Hospital survey 2.0: 2021 user database report</I>  <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/hospital/2021-HSOPS2-Database-Report-Part-I-508.pdf</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Johnston M, Arora S, Anderson O, King D, Behar N, Darzi A. Escalation of care in surgery: A systematic risk assessment to prevent avoidable harm in hospitalized patients. <I>Ann Surg.</I> 2015;<b>261</b>(5):831&ndash;8.</p></li><li><p>Pozzobon LD, Sears K, Zuk A. Leaders&rsquo; role in fostering a just culture. <I>Nursing Leadership (Toronto, Ont.)</I> 2024;<b>36</b>(3):44&ndash;55. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.12927/cjnl.2024.27289</inter-ref>  </p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pozzobon, L., Le, B., Robinson, S., Heggie, J., Al-Awamer, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.247</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.247</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[247 Breaking barriers to speaking up for safety: a leadership toolkit to foster a culture of communication openness]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A185</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A186</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A186-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[248 Reducing salbutamol overuse]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A186-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Paediatricians often prescribe regular salbutamol following discharge of patients with viral induced wheeze and asthma in the form of a weaning plan regimen. Following this plan correctly, patients take around 100 puffs of salbutamol in the 48 hours following discharge, whether they need it or not. In children, salbutamol overuse has been shown to be associated with increased asthma-related deaths, likely due to reduced response of receptors leading to increased tolerance.<sup>1</sup> The 2024 guidelines from the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) recommend that following asthma exacerbation, patients should be discharged with salbutamol as required rather than regular salbutamol.<sup>2</sup>  </p><p>We used the Model for Improvement to design this project, which aimed to change practice in the Paediatrics Department in North Middlesex University Hospital, London, where these children are routinely discharged with advice to take regular salbutamol. We aimed to increase the number of children discharged with advice to use salbutamol as required (rather than regular salbutamol weaning plan) from 0 in 10 to 8 in 10 within 4 months.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>Data collected over one week showed that all 27 patients with diagnosis of viral induced wheeze or asthma were currently being discharged with regular salbutamol. We mapped the steps in a child&rsquo;s treatment journey that results in salbutamol overuse and used a fishbone diagram to identify contributing factors. This included factors such as relying on outdated knowledge and utilising an inappropriate information leaflet.</p><p>We carried out 4 Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. Firstly, we shared our analysis of the local problem with staff by holding a journal club with doctors to present evidence on salbutamol overuse and during informal discussions at nursing handover. It was clear that an existing information leaflet was a major barrier to change. In the second cycle we addressed this problem by creating a new bespoke information leaflet, incorporating staff and patient feedback. In the third cycle we trialled the new bespoke information leaflet over a three week period, and in a further linked intervention, recruited a ward nurse with an interest in asthma to collect feedback on a day to day basis and troubleshoot, enhancing the uptake of change. In the fourth cycle we introduced a short practical session to increase awareness and education around the leaflet.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We achieved our aim, increasing the number of children discharged with advice to use salbutamol as required to more than 9 in 10. We anticipate this will have several benefits to children presenting to our hospital including reduced rates of salbutamol overuse, in turn reducing hospitalisation with wheeze. Families experienced additional benefit, receiving education at discharge on how to assess difficulty in breathing at home, increasing their understanding and autonomy. A reduction in use of regular salbutamol also reduces costs to the NHS and environmental impact of disposable inhalers.</p><p>One of the key challenges we faced was pushback from other departments with our plan to trial the leaflet on a small scale first rather than across the entire hospital. However, by starting small we were able to address misunderstanding of the use of the new leaflet once it was introduced and any other issues that might arise, leading to changes that are sustainable.</p><p>A key lesson learnt was the importance of involving key stakeholders and staff members to increase uptake of change. This is demonstrated in leadership of the project by both a Paediatric Doctor and an Asthma Nurse Specialist, and recruitment of a ward nurse during the change cycles. This nurse was a trusted member of the multidisciplinary team, which we believe improved the success and commitment to our change.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Nwaru BI, Ekstro&#x0308;m M, Hasvold P, Wiklund F, Telg G, Janson C. Overuse of short-acting &beta;2-agonists in asthma is associated with increased risk of exacerbation and mortality: a nationwide cohort study of the global SABINA programme. <I>European Respiratory Journal</I> 2020 Apr 16;<b>55</b>(4).</p></li><li><p>Global Initiative for Asthma. 2024 GINA Main Report. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. Accessed on Jul 12, 2024. Available from: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://ginasthma.org/2024-report/</inter-ref>  </p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ooi, Y., Okezie, N., Hodges, N., Davey, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.248</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.248</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[248 Reducing salbutamol overuse]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A186</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A186</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A186-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[249 A non-weight-based heparin dosing regimen in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may result in unnecessary excess anticoagulation in lower weight patients]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A186-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Anticoagulation is used in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT) to extend hemofilter lifespan and function and therefore enhance delivered therapy. Heparin is often utilized when regional citrate anticoagulation is unavailable, however it is not removed by hemofiltration and leads to systemic anticoagulation requiring monitoring of Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT).<sup>1</sup> While ideal dosing and target APTT range is not clear, an APTT of 45s (APTT ratio 1.5) may represent a balance of bleeding risk and filter lifespan.<sup>2</sup>  </p><p>In our institution, we used a non-weight-based dosing regimen of 1000 units per hour of heparin with a target APTT ratio 2.0 &ndash; 2.5. We hypothesized that this approach could result in excess systemic anticoagulation and therefore bleeding risk in lower-weight patients, so undertook a quality improvement project to address this issue.</p></sec><sec><st>Study methods</st><p>We conducted a retrospective audit of all patients undergoing CRRT in 6-month period July to December 2023. Patient characteristics were recorded in addition to CRRT anticoagulation type, APTT at 8 hours post commencement of anticoagulation, and maximum APTT during the period of CRRT. APTT results were stratified by weight category.</p><p>Following the initial audit, we transitioned to a weight-based heparin protocol with a lower target APTT ratio (range 1.5 &ndash; 1.9). Post institutional protocol change, we re-audited all patients undergoing CRRT in 4-month period Oct 2024-Jan 2025.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In the initial audit pre-practice change, 91 patients underwent CRRT in the 6-month period, of whom 29 received heparin as the sole anticoagulation strategy (25 epoprostenol, 22 both heparin and epoprostenol, 13 no anticoagulation). Of patients receiving a heparin only strategy, median APTT at heparin commencement (APTT0) was 33.5 seconds (range 23&ndash;56.9s). Median APTT at 8 hours (APPT8) was 68.3 seconds (range 33.4&ndash;240 seconds) and maximum median APTT (APPTmax) was 82.9 seconds (range 53.8&ndash;240 seconds). When stratified by weight, patients in lower body weight groups had a higher APTT at 8 hours post commencement of heparin, and a higher APTT maximum value during period of heparinization, compared with patients in higher weight categories. (see <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figures 1a</cross-ref> &amp; <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">1c</cross-ref>).</p><p>In the re-audit post-practice change, 62 patients underwent CRRT in a 4-month period, of whom 25 received heparin as the sole anticoagulation strategy. Compared with median APTT0 33.5 seconds pre-practise change, median APPT0 was 32.1 seconds (range 20&ndash;47.8 seconds). Compared with median APPT8 68.3 seconds pre-practise change, median APPT8 was 48.6 seconds (range 28.6&ndash;142.5 seconds). Compared with median APPTmax 82.9 seconds pre-practise change, median APPTmax was 64.6 seconds (29.7&ndash;240 seconds). In addition, the excess systemic anticoagulation in lower weight groups has been lessened following the protocol change (see <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figures 1b</cross-ref> &amp; <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">1d</cross-ref>).</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 249 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT) measured in seconds at 8 hours post commencement of heparin (APTT8) and maximum APTT recorded during heparin infusion (APTTMAX) in patients receiving heparin as anticoagulation for Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT), Stratified by weight category (in kilograms), displayed with patients who received only epoprostenol as anticoagulation for CRRT, and showing data pre and post transition to a weight based heparin dosing regimen.</p></caption><link locator="249_F1"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>When heparin is utilised as an anticoagulation strategy for CRRT, a non-weight-based dosing regimen results in a greater amount of systemic anticoagulation in patients with lower body weight as compared with higher body weight patients, demonstrated by higher APTT values. In the context of CRRT, this increases the risk of excessive anticoagulation and bleeding without clinical benefit.</p><p>Switching to a weight-based dosing regimen in our institution decreased the risks of unnecessary excess anticoagulation in lower weight patients, ensuring a safer and higher quality of patient centered care for patients undergoing CRRT.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury (2012) KDIGO.org. Available at: https://kdigo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/KDIGO-2012-AKI-Guideline-English.pdf (Accessed: 23 March 2025).</p></li><li><p>van de Wetering J, Westendorp RG, van der Hoeven JG, Stolk B, Feuth JD, Chang PC. Heparin use in continuous renal replacement procedures: the struggle between filter coagulation and patient haemorrhage. <I>J Am Soc Nephrol.</I> 1996 Jan;<b>7</b>(1):145&ndash;50. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V71145. PMID: 8808122.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darby, C., Parkinson-Coombs, N., Fleming, J., OConnor, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.249</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.249</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[249 A non-weight-based heparin dosing regimen in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may result in unnecessary excess anticoagulation in lower weight patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A186</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A188</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A188-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[250 HEADSSS up or HEADSSS down]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A188-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>According to the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (2020) State of Child Health, every young person who comes to the Paediatric Department should have a HEADSSS assessment. When I started working at a District General Hospital, I quickly noticed that doctors in the Paediatric Department were not completing a HEADSSS assessment (Home, Education and employment, Activities, Drugs and alcohol, Sex and relationships, Self-harm, depression and suicidal ideation, Safety including online safety). This led to an incomplete assessment of their social, emotional and risk-taking behaviours and appropriate support not being given. This meant the child suffered. As a baseline, I looked at 10 patients&rsquo; notes and found that 0 had a HEADSSS assessment. Therefore, I had identified an area that needed improvement. I created a SMART (Specific Measurable Achievable Realistic Timely) aim to increase the number of HEADSSS assessments completed in children and young people &ge;11 years old who presented with a mental health issue to the Paediatric Department from 0 out of 10 in May 2024 to 5 out of 10 by September 2024. I developed a measure to assess if a HEADSSS assessment was completed and attributed scores: Fully (2), partially (1) or not at all (0). My inclusion criteria were: All children and young people <b>&ge;</b> 11 years old who attended PAU or the Paediatric Ward with a mental health issue. My exclusion criteria were: Children &lt;11 years old and children presenting with physical health problems, not related to their mental health. I undertook weekly sampling, looking through the patients&rsquo; notes throughout the 5 months of the project.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>I used the Model for Improvement to structure my work. I used the ideas I had thought of combined with ones collected through early engagement with my colleagues and tested them using Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. I completed 6 PDSA cycles. I spoke with individual resident doctors about the HEADSSS assessment. I then led a departmental teaching session for a consultant, resident doctors and medical students and identified more than half of my audience had not heard of the HEADSSS assessment. I asked the senior paediatric nurses to remind resident doctors to complete the HEADSSS assessment, which they welcomed and they were also interested in completing it themselves. Next, I asked the senior paediatric nurses to complete the HEADSSS assessment and they agreed. I also asked more paediatric nurses to complete the HEADSSS assessment. The HEADSSS assessment was not in the clerking booklet, therefore I added a section for the HEADSSS assessment to remind doctors and nurses to complete it. The number of assessments completed then showed a sustained increase.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>5 out of 10 patients had a fully completed HEADSSS assessment, therefore I achieved my aim. I created a run chart which showed the number of patients that had a HEADSSS assessment completed, partially completed or not completed.</p><p>Initially, my change ideas helped to increase the number of HEADSSS assessments done, but when I was not present to remind people, then the number decreased. Therefore, to make a sustained change I added the HEADSSS assessment to the clerking booklet. This led to an increasing trend of 6 patients having a partially or fully completed HEADSSS assessment even in my absence, which showed that a sustained change had been achieved. I learnt that you do not need to start with big changes to bring about a change and small changes can be just as significant. In addition to this, I learnt that speaking to different people in each PDSA cycle can yield a wealth of information and innovative ideas.</p><p>All Paediatricians should perform a HEADSSS assessment on children and young people &ge; 11 years old attending Hospital, as they could be struggling in a particular aspect of their life, where they do not know where to go for help. If you perform a HEADSSS assessment they may reveal this aspect to you and you can take steps to support them and help them through this part of their life, via referrals to other services such as CAMHS (Child Adolescent Mental Health Service) and to the children&rsquo;s safeguarding team and signposting them to helpful resources. This will help reduce health inequality and all children and young people will be given the opportunity to voice their concerns about psychosocial aspects of their life and will be offered support tailored to their needs.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quartey-Papafio, K., Davey, N., Niranjan, U.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.250</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.250</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[250 HEADSSS up or HEADSSS down]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A188</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A188</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A188-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[251 Analysis of the effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol implementation in joint replacement surgery]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A188-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to optimize perioperative care through evidence-based interventions. This study explored the effectiveness of ERAS implementation in joint replacement surgery at NTU Hsin-Chu Hospital, with a focus on patient outcomes including length of stay and post-operative pain management. According to the 2023 Joint Replacement Care Quality Certification Evaluation Criteria, effective implementation of quality improvement projects and monitoring of clinical outcomes are essential for enhancing surgical safety and promoting holistic patient care.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Beginning in May 2023, the Joint Replacement Disease Certification Team revised standard operating procedures through monthly consensus meetings. Interventions included: (1) ERAS education and training for staff; (2) development of a clinical consensus checklist; (3) preoperative optimization with nutritional and rehabilitation assessments starting from outpatient visits; (4) implementation of preoperative fasting guidelines with carbohydrate supplementation; and (5) patient education about ERAS care with subsequent satisfaction surveys. The protocol emphasized optimized pain management, nutritional support, early mobilization, and standardized post-operative care. Patients and families were invited to participate in needs assessments and provide feedback throughout the process. We compared hospital length of stay and postoperative pain scores between ERAS and control groups to measure improvement.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Analysis revealed no significant difference in hospital length of stay between groups, with the ERAS group averaging 6.67 days (SD=0.75) compared to 6.75 days (SD=1.17) for the control group (p=0.572). However, pain scores on the first postoperative day were significantly higher in the ERAS group (mean=5.33, SD=1.668) compared to the control group (mean=4.27, SD=1.633; p=0.000). This increased pain was likely associated with the early mobilization and rehabilitation components of the ERAS protocol. While the implementation did not achieve significant reductions in length of stay, the experience provided valuable insights for future care process adjustments, workflow optimization, patient acceptance improvement, enhanced cross-team collaboration, and long-term data collection. Despite the short-term increase in pain, the ERAS protocol offers potential benefits in recovery acceleration, hospital stay reduction, enhanced patient self-management, cost reduction, resource optimization, and improved team collaboration.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sui, Y. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.251</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.251</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[251 Analysis of the effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol implementation in joint replacement surgery]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A188</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A189</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A189-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[252 Enhancement of learning atmosphere in emergency clinical setting - cranial nerve program]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A189-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Continuous professional healthcare education could improve staff&rsquo;s competence and confidence in managing various clinical situation, hence enhancing the quality of care, patient&rsquo;s safety as well as job satisfaction. Traditional teacher-centred education provides large volume of specific knowledge with minimum interpersonal involvement, which might hinder learners&rsquo; engagement, resulting in demotivated learning experience. With the advancement in technology, staff have different expectations and learning styles that require a more interactive, flexible, and technology-driven approach to education. Therefore, a continuous cranial nerve program collaborated with social media influencers as a tool to drive fresh nursing graduates&rsquo; motivation and involvement in learning.</p></sec><sec><st>Methodology</st><p>Cranial nerve program is a learner-centred specialty training program with the use of various teaching tools to promote conductive and self-directed learning environment. With the use of social media and smart technology, the program focused on habitual and succinct continuum of learning, utilizing the attention span of learner, and promoting adult learning. By creating same vision and diversion for learning in emergency clinical area, a pair of cranial nerve is cyclically introduced per month with different prior learning material provided. Clinical practice and return demonstration were performed. With positive engagement and learning experience, the nurse learners mature their readiness to learn and drive their desire to acquire the knowledge continually. Nurse learners&rsquo; care related to cranial nerves pathology is therefore enhanced.</p></sec><sec><st>Results &amp; outcomes</st><p>Multiple choice questions, return demonstrations and debriefing interview sessions were conducted to evaluate participants&rsquo; knowledge and competence, self-perception in neurosurgical care, as well as their satisfaction of the program. Results showed that participants demonstrate significant increase in confidence and competencies in performing neurosurgical care. Participant showed increased knowledge and positive engagement in the advancement of professional development.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>With the use of advanced technology and the impact of social media influence, a culture of continuous learning and self-directiveness would be achieved, which provide a nutritious and positive learning environment and experience to the new generation of digital native. Hence, engaging them in self-driven adult learning and striving them for the professional development and excellence.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chung Leung, C., Ying Natalie, H. N., Man Edmond, F. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.252</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.252</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[252 Enhancement of learning atmosphere in emergency clinical setting - cranial nerve program]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A189</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A189</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A189-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[253 PrecisionGluco squad: an initiative for effective blood glucose monitoring for patients on enteral bolus feeding]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A189-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Timely monitoring of capillary blood glucose (CBG) levels is crucial for optimizing glycaemic control in inpatients with diabetes receiving enteral bolus feeding. The Joint British Diabetes Societies (2024) recommends checking CBG pre-feed.<sup>1</sup> However, review of inpatient glycaemic data indicated that CBG orders for those on enteral feeding were prescribed as -OM (On Morning), BD (Twice Daily), or TDS (Thrice Daily), similar to those for non-enterally fed patients. This leads to CBG being monitored before ward routine mealtimes instead of specifically before enteral feed administration. Consequently, some CBG checks occur post-feeds, resulting in &lsquo;hyperglycaemia range readings&rsquo; leading to unnecessary correctional insulin boluses. Such practices may contribute to hypoglycaemia, patient discomfort, and increased time for consultations and insulin administration. This project aims to reduce hyperglycaemia incidence and improve CBG monitoring practices.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>To assess hyperglycaemia and inappropriate CBG monitoring, we analysed pre-implementation data. This revealed a median of 2 hyperglycaemias (defined as CBG &gt;10 mmol/L) episodes per patient per day and 56% of CBG tests (74/134 checks) being inappropriately timed (defined as more than 1 hour before, or within 2 hours after feeding). A survey with a 75.4% response rate from 258 nurses showed that 90.3% preferred a CBG check guide. Root causes were identified using a Cause-and-Effect diagram, prioritized with a Pareto chart and multi-voting. Our analysis was shared through regular meetings and training sessions to engage staff.</p><p>A standardized flowchart (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>), co-developed by an endocrinologist and diabetes nurse educators, was implemented in four wards to guide nursing staff on blood glucose monitoring. The flowchart specifies that checks should occur within one hour before enteral bolus feeding for optimal glycaemic control.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 253 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Guide for Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) monitoring for patients on enteral bolus feeding</p></caption><link locator="253_F1"></fig></p><p>The change implementation utilized the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle, beginning with two weeks of trainer training for nurses. Staff engagement was enhanced through surveys, brainstorming sessions, and a dedicated contact number, allowing for continuous feedback and adjustments.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Run charts were utilized to evaluate the intervention&rsquo;s impact. Episodes of hyperglycaemia decreased from 2 episodes per patient per day to 1/patient/day (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>). The rate of inappropriately timed CBG testing significantly reduced from 56% (74/134 checks) to 7% (14/114 checks) (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F3">figure 3</cross-ref>). Furthermore, the percentage of patients with diabetes on enteral bolus feeding requiring intervention from the inpatient glucose management (IGM) team fell from 36.8% to 18.8%. These improvements are estimated to yield annual savings of $16,425 in consumables, 194.02 hours of labour, and $23,636.72 in manpower costs. The rollout of this initiative is set to expand hospital-wide, already receiving approval, which will benefit 24 inpatient wards and generate significant cost savings. Feedback from the team has been positive, with patients experiencing fewer hyperglycaemia episodes and reduced insulin injections. Caregivers noted that the pre-feeding CBG checking guide was clear and easy to follow, alleviating anxiety by decreasing hyperglycaemia episodes.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 253 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Run chart: number of hyperglycaemia episodes per patient per day (Outcome Measure)</p></caption><link locator="253_F2"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F3"><no>Abstract 253 Figure 3</no><caption><p>Run chart: percentage of inappropriate CBG testing per day (Process Measure)</p></caption><link locator="253_F3"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The implementation of the blood glucose monitoring guide for patients on enteral feeding streamlined processes, resulting in significant savings in manpower and costs while enhancing operational efficiency. This protocol improved patient experiences by reducing expenses related to consumables and insulin injections, alleviating discomfort from insulin administration and finger pricks, and ultimately enhancing health outcomes. It effectively addressed issues with mis-timed CBG checks, a major concern of the initiative.</p><p>Despite challenges in coordinating interdisciplinary meetings, the team successfully utilized phone calls and virtual meetings for ongoing communication and troubleshooting. Sustained improvements are attributed to the commitment from the dietetics, endocrinology, and pharmacy departments, ensuring adherence to new standards in inpatient glucose management for long-term positive outcomes.</p><p>The initiative emphasized the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration. In hindsight, leveraging IT systems for automated data collection would have been beneficial. Anticipated challenges include maintaining communication amid staff turnover, highlighting the need for regular training to sustain effectiveness.</p><p>Overall, the project demonstrates the value of teamwork in healthcare interventions, leading to fewer hyperglycaemia episodes, improved patient satisfaction, and significant cost savings.</p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Joint British Diabetes Societies for Inpatient Care. (2024, April). Glycaemic management during enteral feeding for people with diabetes in hospital. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://abcd.care/sites/default/files/resources/JBDS_05_Enteral_Feeding%20_Guideline_April_2024</inter-ref>.pdf</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Junjiao, Y., Liow, E., Hui, E. B., Ling, C. Y., Tan Su-Lyn, D. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.253</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.253</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[253 PrecisionGluco squad: an initiative for effective blood glucose monitoring for patients on enteral bolus feeding]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A189</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A191</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A195-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[256 Flow forward: how Hounslow talking therapies used QI to transform access at West London NHS Trust]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A195-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Hounslow Talking Therapies (HTT), part of West London NHS Trust, identified significant delays in referral screening processes, with some patients waiting up to 30 days for an outcome. This impacted the service&rsquo;s ability to meet NHS standards requiring 75% of patients to be offered an appointment within six weeks of referral. As part of a national quality improvement (QI) programme with the NCCMH, the HTT team aimed to transform access pathways by improving demand, capacity, and flow through targeted system redesign and inclusive engagement.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The aim was to ensure 95% of patients received a referral outcome within seven working days. A driver diagram identified three key changes: removal of opt-in letters, elimination of &lsquo;awaiting missing information&rsquo; (AMRI) processes, and consolidation of a two-stage screening into one. These changes were tested using Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles over an 18-month period, initially piloted with a small team before wider rollout. Quantitative data tracked referral outcome times, assessment offers, and demand-capacity alignment. Qualitative feedback from clinicians ensured changes did not negatively affect decision-making, wellbeing, or clinical standards. An expert by experience (EbE) contributed to co-design and feedback at every stage.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>An increase to 97% of referrals being screened within 7 working days was achieved. Changes implemented resulted in a more efficient process thus reducing waiting time for clients, in addition to fewer administrative processes, increased support avenues and skill development for clinicians.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The HTT team&rsquo;s approach offers a replicable model for improving screening and access pathways in other NHS services using a demand-capacity-flow lens. Their method is now being considered for wider adoption across Talking Therapies services in the region.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Domingo, J., Norman, A., Paul, L., Lewis, S., the West London NHS Hounslow Talking Therapies Team]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.256</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.256</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[256 Flow forward: how Hounslow talking therapies used QI to transform access at West London NHS Trust]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A195</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A195</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A195-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[257 People powering clinical practice: Ealing community partners pulmonary rehabilitation QI at West London NHS trust]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A195-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Ealing Community Partners&rsquo; Pulmonary Rehabilitation team, part of West London NHS Trust, identified a need to improve clinical practice through increased engagement of staff and patients in quality improvement (QI). With growing pressures on respiratory services and increasing patient complexity, it became critical to co-develop improvements that supported safe, efficient, and patient-centred care. This project aimed to use people-powered QI to enhance service delivery, foster clinical ownership, and embed sustainable change within routine pulmonary rehabilitation practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The QI team partnered with frontline clinicians, service leads, and patients to identify key pressure points and opportunities for improvement. Using tools such as process mapping and feedback surveys, the team co-produced change ideas focused on streamlining referral triage, improving data quality, and enhancing interdisciplinary communication. Structured Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were conducted to test and refine interventions. Staff were engaged through regular QI huddles, team workshops, and collaborative audits, while patients contributed via feedback groups and pilot testing of new processes.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Referral processing times decreased by 35%, dropping from 20 to 13 working days, and data accuracy improved through new documentation practices co-developed with clinicians.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>These approaches have now been embedded into everyday practice, with staff describing the QI sessions as empowering and collaborative. Plans are underway to replicate the model across additional clinical teams.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lennon, S., Pandya, M., Kaliaraju, D., the West Lonon NHS Ealing Community Partners Pulmonary Rehabilitation Team]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.257</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.257</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[257 People powering clinical practice: Ealing community partners pulmonary rehabilitation QI at West London NHS trust]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A195</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A195</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A195-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[258 Building safer forensic care: how West London NHS trust's QI team engaged hearts and minds]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A195-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>West London NHS Trust (WLT) is one of the UK&rsquo;s most diverse providers of mental health, community, and social care services. Reducing Restrictive Practices (RRP) is a key priority in improving safety, experience, and outcomes for both patients and staff. Forensic settings, however, present unique challenges due to complex patient needs, heightened risk profiles, and necessary procedural controls. This project aimed to reduce restrictive practices across forensic wards by improving understanding, strengthening staff-patient communication, and embedding co-produced solutions to foster safer, more person-centred care.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>An RRP facilitator from the QI team collaborated with ward teams, patients, and carers to identify barriers to safe, transparent care. Initial analysis of restraint, seclusion, and enforced treatment data revealed knowledge gaps among staff and patients. Interventions included two staff training sessions focused on the Use of Force Act and RRP principles, alongside co-production of a patient-friendly information sheet. Monthly working groups and ward community meetings created opportunities for dialogue, feedback, and shared learning. Support was maintained through regular coaching and ward presence by the RRP team.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The project aimed to reduce restrictive practices in forensic services by 25%. One ward reduced Long-Term Segregation (LTS) Days by over 60% within two months&mdash;sustained for a further three months. These changes were tracked through run charts and supported by process measures, including training attendance, feedback volume, and patient participation. Co-production helped shape both staff content and patient-facing materials. A rise in Short-Term Seclusion (STS) Days was observed as a balancing measure, and a subsequent QI project was launched to address it.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Findings support the value of team autonomy, co-production, and flexible adaptation to dynamic ward environments. This model is actively informing future safety strategies across forensic settings within the Trust.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin, N., Ogbebor, F., the West London NHS Forensics Reducing Restrictive Practice Team]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.258</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.258</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[258 Building safer forensic care: how West London NHS trust's QI team engaged hearts and minds]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A195</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A196</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A196-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[259 Making quality priorities work: how West London NHS trust QI team built a framework to support change]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A196-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>West London NHS Trust&rsquo;s Quality Improvement (QI) team supports a broad portfolio of services including mental health, community, and social care. In 2023, the team identified a critical gap: service lines were struggling to manage and demonstrate progress against Trust-wide Quality Priorities (QPs). This hindered organisational learning, engagement, and the sustainability of improvement efforts. The team aimed to establish a unified framework that would build QI capability, standardise measurement, and embed meaningful stakeholder engagement.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A phased, multi-year approach was adopted. In 2023, a QI scoring system and quality assurance framework were launched, supported by monthly coaching. By mid-2023, each service line had an assigned QI Facilitator, access to visual tracking tools, and bespoke resource packs tailored to local needs. In 2024, the model evolved to include driver diagrams, differentiated materials for varied audiences, and streamlined reporting mechanisms.</p><p>Staff were engaged through direct coaching, collaborative design workshops, governance structures, and real-time feedback loops. Patients and carers were active partners throughout&mdash;co-producing tools, shaping communication strategies, and contributing to shared learning events.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Early data indicates marked improvement in QI maturity across service lines, with capability scores increasing on a structured 1&ndash;5 scale. Quality assurance compliance improved, and engagement levels rose among staff and stakeholders. Teams reported increased ownership, clearer feedback mechanisms, and greater confidence in leading improvement efforts. Patient and carer co-production led to better-aligned tools and more inclusive processes. A full evaluation of impact and sustainability is planned for April 2025.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>This approach demonstrates that targeted investment in QI infrastructure can accelerate impact and build long-term capability. The framework is now being considered for adaptation across other Trusts in the region, highlighting its transferability and scalability.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Veeramah, S., Tracey, D., Durham, J., Ferlez, E., West London NHS Trust Quality Improvement Team]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.259</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.259</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[259 Making quality priorities work: how West London NHS trust QI team built a framework to support change]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A196</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A196</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A196-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[260 Enhancing acute heart failure management: a quality improvement project at St. Marys hospital, Isle of wight]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A196-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introductions</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome characterised by symptoms (dyspnoea, orthopnoea, lower limb swelling) and signs (elevated jugular venous pressure, pulmonary congestion) often caused by a structural and/or functional cardiac abnormality resulting in reduced cardiac output and/or elevated intracardiac pressures.<sup>1</sup>  </p></li><li><p>The aim of this re-audit was to review current service provision against national standards from NICE and to review the change we made in the heart failure service after our audit first cycle on the Isle of Wight.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Methodology</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>The re-audit took 94 patients admitted with acute heart failure symptoms between (2022&ndash;2023) and measured the following criteria which includes initial investigations, echocardiography. pharmacological treatment, patients hospital monitoring, length of stay, referral/review by cardiology team. In-hospital mortality and follow-up.</p></li><li><p>Patient selection: were identified from a HF list provided by audit team and an excel spreadsheet was developed and all patients were added and assessed against the following variants:</p></li><li><p>M/F, Age, Admission date, Diagnosis, CXR, ECG, Bloods, In-patient referral to cardiology, patient reviewed by cardiology and echo within 48 hours,medical treatment</p></li><li><p>Patient heart failure readmission in 6 months, and in 1 month was recorded </p></li><li><p>In-hospital mortality was properly addressed and recorded</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Demographics: there are more females than males in all age groups . The mean age is 78.55 less than the previous cycle. All the initial investigations were done in all patients .</p></li><li><p>All the initial investigations were done in all patients(</p></li><li><p>Echocardiography was done in 82% within 48 hours compared to 39% in the first cycle</p></li><li><p>67% of patient were referred to cardiology compared to 36% in the 1st cycle .62% of patient were seen by cardiology team after referral compared to 37% in the first cycle.</p></li><li><p>There is a significant improvement in prescribing of Heart failure treatment &bull; Beta blockers were prescribed to 88% of patients &bull; An ACE inhibitor was prescribed 47%, angiotensin receptor blocker was prescribed 22%</p></li><li><p>Diuretics were prescribed 99%&bull; Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) were prescribed to 53%. Sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2) drugs were prescribed to 41% of patients compared to 60% of patients in the national guidance</p></li><li><p>There is significant improvement in patient monitoring with weight chart 70% of patients compared to 43% in the first cycle and urine output 79%compared to 53% in first cycle. Renal function monitoring is almost the same in both audit cycles.</p></li><li><p>There is a marked decrease in the median length of hospital stay 6days compared to 7 days in the 1st cycle and 8 days in the national audits</p></li><li><p>Regarding Follow up :35% of patients were followed up in the Cardiology clinic ,45% of patients were followed up by heart failure nurses and 28% were followed up by GP.</p></li><li><p>Readmission and Mortality: 6 months readmission with heart failure symptoms reduced to 5%. Heart Failure readmission within 1 month reduced from 9% to 7%</p></li><li><p>In Hospital mortality increased to 17% because of patient multiple co morbidities and age group</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JG, Coats AJ, <I>et al</I>. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. <I>Eur Heart J.</I> 2016;<b>37</b>(27):2129&ndash;200. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abdelkader, A., Bonner, S., Salem, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.260</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.260</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[260 Enhancing acute heart failure management: a quality improvement project at St. Marys hospital, Isle of wight]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A196</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A197</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A199-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[263 The impact of establishing a comprehensive stop smoking service at a primary healthcare setting in the quit attempts: a quality improvement project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A199-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>In 2005, Oman joined the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control ( WHO FCTC) to minimize tobacco consumption (WHO, 2020). Countries ratifying the FCTC are mandated to offer tobacco cessation service at its best practice, which includes tobacco cessation medications, counselling, and a toll-free Quitline (WHO, 2013). Current epidemiological data revealed that Oman lacks a national tobacco cessation program that meets the WHO FCTC minimal standards. The trend of tobacco use is on the rise (8.0%) and is attributable to 8.7% of deaths in Oman (Salma and Paul, 2023). This study aims to analyse the impact of establishing a tobacco cessation service at North Al-Khuwair Health Center (NKHC) at its best practice approach in the quit attempt of tobacco users.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A quality improvement initiative was carried out at NKHC using the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycle to establish a tobacco cessation service at its best practice. The study population was tobacco users of all age groups who attended NKHC from July 2024 to March 2025. Brief advice was provided as general practice at each clinical encounter. Tobacco users who expressed their readiness to quit were evaluated at a stop smoking clinic and were given free tobacco cessation support (behavioural and nicotine replacement therapy). All patients were followed up with a blended approach (in person and by phone) for a total of three months. The outcome of interest was a quit attempt. Descriptive analysis (n,%) was carried out using SPSS version 27.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Prior to July 2024, the tobacco cessation service was not operational at NKHC. A total of 30 tobacco users visited the stop smoking clinic from July 2024 to March 2025. More than half (n=17, 56.7%) were over the age of 40. Almost one in five (n=5, 16.7%) of tobacco users were under the age of 18. Most tobacco users were males (n=29, 96.7%), married (n=23, 76.7%), employed (n=23, 76.7%), and used compostable tobacco products (n=24, 80.0%). Over one third (n=12, 40.0%) used tobacco products at home, and a similar portion smoked with either friends (n=15, 30.0%) or family members (n=1, 3.3%). Nearly two thirds (n=19, 63.3%) of tobacco users were exposed to second-hand smoke. Over two thirds (n=21, 70.0%), while mental health accounted for 13.3% of tobacco users. Nearly half of tobacco users had a previous quit attempt, with the majority (n=11, 79.0%) attempting to quit using cold turkey methods. All tobacco users (n=30, 100.0%) who attended the clinic were asked and advised to quit tobacco products by healthcare professionals. The majority were ready to quit (n=24, 80.0%) and a similar portion attempted to quit.</p><p>Activating tobacco cessation services at their best practice can increase uptake of cessation services, increase readiness to quit, and subsequently increase quit attempts. More research is required to examine the impact of implementing tobacco cessation at its best practice in increasing quit rates.</p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>WHO. Core questionnaire of the reporting instrument of WHO FCTC. 2020. Available: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">Oman_2020_WHOFCTCreport.pdf</inter-ref> [Accessed March 25, 2025].</p></li><li><p>Salma A-K, Paul K. Building on Success in Tobacco Control: A Roadmap Towards Tobacco-Free Oman (Perspective Review). <I>J Public Health Intern</I> 2023;6(4):1&ndash;17. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.14302/issn.2641-4538.jphi-23-4635</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>WHO<I>. Guidelines for implementation of article 14</I> (no date) <I>Who.int</I>. 2013. Available: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://fctc.who.int/publications/m/item/guidelines-for-implementation-of-article-14</inter-ref> [Accessed March 25, 2025].</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al-Kalbani, S. R., Al-Lawati, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.263</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.263</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[263 The impact of establishing a comprehensive stop smoking service at a primary healthcare setting in the quit attempts: a quality improvement project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A199</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A199</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A199-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[264 Poster presentation: patients as partners - unlocking innovative solutions for better care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A199-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Meaningful patient engagement is crucial for delivering patient-centered care. This project showcases the impact of patient partnerships in co-designing innovative solutions to improve care experiences and outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness of patient-led initiatives and co-production strategies in enhancing patient satisfaction, health outcomes, and staff engagement.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>A collaborative approach involving patient interviews, workshops, and project teams was used.</p></li><li><p>Patients, carers, and healthcare professionals worked together to identify needs, design solutions, and implement changes.</p></li><li><p>Conducted in a community care facility.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Patient satisfaction increased from 85% to 95%.</p></li><li><p>Hospital readmissions decreased by 25%.</p></li><li><p>Staff satisfaction improved by 20%.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Patient partnerships are vital for driving meaningful change in healthcare. This initiative demonstrates the value of co-production principles and patient-centered approaches in improving care experiences and outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Implications for Practice</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Empower patients as partners in care design and delivery.</p></li><li><p>Foster collaborative relationships between patients, carers, and healthcare professionals.</p></li><li><p>Implement patient-centered solutions to enhance care quality and safety.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Acknowledgments</st><p>Thanks to all patients, carers, and healthcare professionals who participated in this initiative.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maurice, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.264</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.264</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[264 Poster presentation: patients as partners - unlocking innovative solutions for better care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A199</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A199</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A200-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[265 Prevalence of low-value nursing care in Dutch hospitals: a basis for developing implementation strategies]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A200-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Healthcare is under pressure due to rising care demands and a declining workforce. Increasing treatment options drive up costs, making efficient use of nurses&rsquo; time crucial for maintaining quality care. This forces choices to be made to keep healthcare accessible to everyone. Despite striving for high standards, nurses often perform low-value nursing care (LVNC) interventions. LVNC is defined as care that: a) provides minimal or no benefit to the patient; b) wastes limited resources; and c) can cause physical, psychological or financial harm to patients. Reducing low-value nursing care contributes to keeping healthcare future-proof. Currently, there is no good insight into the frequency of LVNC performance by nurses in hospitals, therefore it is important to determine the current prevalence of LVNC.</p><p>The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of low-value nursing care using a recently revised questionnaire among Dutch nurses working in general hospital wards.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted among registered nurses working on general hospital wards across the Netherlands using convenience sampling approach. The Nursing Care Questionnaire (NCQ) was developed based on Choosing Wisely and &lsquo;do-not-do recommendations for nursing care list&rsquo;. Nurses received an online survey via email or QR-code posters. The questionnaire, taking five minutes to complete, measured LVNC prevalence through frequency and sum scores of low-value tasks performed. Personal characteristics were collected, and multiple regression analysis identified potential influencing factors.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 1598 nurses participated, with most being female (91.4%) and an average of 27 years (IQR 24-36). They had a median of five years of work experience (IQR 2-12) and performed an average of nine LVNC task in their last seven shifts. The most common LVNC tasks were:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Let older adults lie in bed or only get up to a chair (56.1%)</p></li><li><p>Medication to prevent delirium (54.9%)</p></li><li><p>Use physical restraints in case of a delirium (54.9%)</p></li><li><p>Doing a urine sediment or dip slide to diagnose urinary tract infection in frail elderly people (48.7%)</p></li><li><p>Wake a sleeping patient for unnecessary routine care (48.2%)</p></li></l></p><p>Night shifts and higher nursing education levels were associated with more unfinished tasks and LVNC. Additionally, a greater workload of non-nursing tasks correlated with increased LVNC.</p><p>Reducing LVNC is essential for improving patient safety and ensuring sustainability healthcare. The widespread presence of LVNC highlights the need for targeted de-implementation strategies, which are now being explored in collaboration with nurses across multiple hospitals. The absence of demographic or ward-specific influencing factors suggests that these tasks are deeply embedded in nursing routines and institutional structures, making change complex. Future research should focus on understanding the underlying drivers of LVNC and developing effective, evidence-based de-implementation strategies. Ultimately, self-reflection among nurses is essential to optimizing care delivery and improving patient outcomes.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derks, C. T., Heul, M. v. d., Ista, E., Vos, A. J. d., Dijk, M. v.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.265</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.265</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[265 Prevalence of low-value nursing care in Dutch hospitals: a basis for developing implementation strategies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A200</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A200</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A200-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[266 PCT power: enhancing antibiotic stewardship in 24 hours for late onset sepsis!]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A200-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The Leeds Neonatal Unit, a tertiary-level centre, provides specialised care for premature and critically ill newborns. Antibiotics remain one of the most prescribed medications on a neonatal unit.<sup>1</sup> Prolonged and repeated use of antibiotics affects the neonatal gut microflora and has many other downsides.<sup>2</sup> Stopping antibiotics early with a blood test, procalcitonin, result can improve outcomes in the neonatal patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim</st><p>Baseline data collection over 13 weeks revealed that only 25% of antibiotic courses were stopped within 24 hours. This project aimed to safely reduce the duration of antibiotic administration by acting on procalcitonin (PCT) results, a blood test which is a sensitive and specific early marker of sepsis.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>A fishbone analysis, process mapping, and staff surveys identified key barriers, including uncertainty in interpreting PCT results and delays due to haemolysed or insufficient blood samples. IHI model for improvement<sup>3</sup> was used to design and test change ideas. 9 PDSA cycles (<cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>) were carried out over a period of 12 weeks and interventions included improving laboratory processes, providing staff education on PCT interpretation, refining guidelines, and restricting PCT use to late-onset sepsis cases. The impact was measured through weekly run charts, with a target to increase 24-hour antibiotic cessation from 25% to 50%.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The interventions led to a clear increase in the proportion of antibiotics stopped within 24 hours, with several weeks reaching 100% cessation after negative PCT results (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>). There was a clear shift of the data above the median baseline which was maintained over a period of 12 weeks with one &lsquo;astronomic&rsquo; data point at week 19. Using a different blood sample bottle and simplifying Procalcitonin use reduced delays and confusion. Communicating these changes via email, Facebook, and WhatsApp raised staff awareness, but relying solely on email was ineffective as not all staff checked it regularly. There was still significant week-to-week fluctuation in the data, indicating a lack of confidence and knowledge among some team members in interpreting Procalcitonin (PCT) results for late-onset neonatal sepsis. This highlights the need for further education.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>This project successfully increased the cessation of antibiotics within 24 hours following a negative procalcitonin (PCT) result, with some weeks achieving a 100% cessation rate. However, week-to-week fluctuations suggest that some staff still lack confidence in interpreting PCT results for neonatal sepsis, highlighting the need for ongoing education and support. Effective communication, process improvements, and multidisciplinary collaboration were key to enhancing antibiotic stewardship. Sustaining these changes in a high-turnover environment requires well-trained senior staff, clear guidelines, and continuous monitoring. Regular reviews will help ensure long-term sustainability, quickly identify any performance deterioration, and allow timely intervention when necessary. Strengthening education on PCT interpretation and antibiotic stewardship will further optimise neonatal care and reduce unnecessary antibiotic exposure.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Hsieh EM, Hornik CP, Clark RH, <I>et al</I>. Medication use in the neonatal intensive care unit. <I>Am J Perinatol</I> 2014;<b>31</b>:811&ndash;21.</p></li><li><p>de Man P, Verhoeven BA, Verbrugh HA, <I>et al</I>. An antibiotic policy to prevent emergence of resistant bacilli. <I>Lancet</I> 2000;<b>355</b>:973&ndash;8.</p></li><li><p>https://www.ihi.org/resources/how-improve-model-improvement</p></li></l></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 266 Figure 1</no><link locator="266_F1"></fig></p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 266 Table 1</no><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>PDSA</b>  <br>  <b>Test #</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>PLAN</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>DO</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>STUDY</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>ACT</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="5" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1a </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Liaise with lab to identify why samples are insufficient/haemolysed </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Week 14: Email clinical scientist of pathology lab and highlighted the problem- asked for recommendations. </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Identified using a different bottle will help reduce rejected samples </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Adopt: Circulated an email to the department instructing staff to use the new bottle for sample collection. </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1b </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Send email to highlight the new bottle for sample collection </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Week 15: Email sent to Medical and nursing staff. </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Some responses to the email but some colleagues might not be checking their emails regularly </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Adapt- use departmental Facebook group and medical whatsapp group to disseminate information.<br>Extend- the period of spreading information </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1c </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Share information about the new bottles via whatsapp and facebook </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">End of Week 15 : posted on facebook and whatsapp. Lots of response. </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Able to reach more colleagues </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Extend- period of sharing information </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1d </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Liaised with &lsquo;Every drop counts&rsquo; QI team. Adopted our action plan into theirs to ensure awareness of the pitfall identified </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Week 17: Email &lsquo;everydrop counts&rsquo; QI group leader and request if they can include information about correct botte and minimum volume in their work </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Positive response from group lead. They will highlight the information during their activities </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Analyse data for patients on antibiotics over last 4 weeks and identify any patterns to find new ideas for improvement </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Analyse data for week 14&ndash;17, identify any patterns in stopping/not stopping antibiotics. </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Data collected and analysed for the these weeks. </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Significant improvement in stopping abx at 24hrs, by 38.6% (63.6% vs 25% on baseline data) However, concerns remained about inconsistency in adherence amongst the senior team members despite the improvement in insufficient/haemolysed samples </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Arrang departmental teaching to improve knowledge about using PCT results to stop antibiotics at 24hrs<br>Use the teaching to explore what team thinks stops them from stopping antibiotics at 24hrs </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3a </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Design and deliver teaching to the department. Explore why stops medics in stopping antibiotics </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Week 18: Bedside teaching + lecture on the value of PCT in LONS on departmental educational sessions </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Feedback during teaching that the use of PCT in early onset neonatal sepsis and the physiologically elevated values due to prematurity, cause significant confusion and lack of reliability to the biomarker in Late onset neonatal sepsis </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Arrange MDT meeting (microbiologists, neonatal team and clinical governance team) about rationalising the use of PCT in the neonatal population. &middot; </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3b </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Meet the MDT team, share the noted improvement as seen in data for week 14&ndash;17, and share the feedback from the team about PCT confusion as noted above </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Week 19: Data and feedback shared with MDT team </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">All MDT members agreed to rationalise use of PCT on neonatal ward to LONS only.<br>Positive feedback on the improvement trend </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Decision to stop using PCT in EONS- disseminate this to the team </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4a </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Use the QI presentation meeting to disseminate information about stopping PCT use in EONS </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Week 20: Current progress presented on the Qi meeting and the information shared about change in guidance and rationalising of PCT use to LONS patients only </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Over next week, I observed that patients with EONS were still having PCT sent- The message shared on the QI meeting had not spread to the wider team </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Design a poster/visual aid that can be circulated via email, facebpok, whatsapp and also made available by uploading on Neonatal Education website (Padlet) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4b </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Create a visual poster to highlight when and when not to send PCT<br>Share this with the team </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Week 21: Poster shared via facebook, whatsapp and Padlet.<br>Also displayed in area where equipment from blood sampling is collected </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Noted more colleagues were aware of the change in guideline.<br>Observed less PCT requests for EONS patients during daily ward handovers.<br>Overall improvement in number of courses stopped stopped at 24hrs , but huge swings in trend indicating ongoing need for team education </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Extend the period of bedside teaching and information dissemination </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Naseer, S., Pappa, O., Mckechnie, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.266</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.266</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[266 PCT power: enhancing antibiotic stewardship in 24 hours for late onset sepsis!]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A200</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A202</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A206-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[270 Clicks matter. improving ordering efficiency]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A206-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>A goal of the physician wellness program at CHEO is to improve physician electronic health record (EHR) experience and satisfaction. The initiative focused on &lsquo;Easier ordering&rsquo; to enhance admission ordering efficiency and improve inpatient and outpatient one-click orders. This quality improvement project aimed to improve EHR efficiency by reducing the number of clicks required for common orders that physicians rarely modify. Ultimately, we sought to decrease EHR cognitive load and promote more time spent on direct patient care.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Three physicians and two information system business analysts prioritized two projects deemed to have the greatest impact with minimal system intervention. The first project aimed to improve hospital admission ordering efficiency by changing the system to automatically set the admission diagnosis as the patient&lsquo;s primary problem at the time of admission. The second project focused on improving inpatient and outpatient One-Click Orders. The team reviewed the top 100 records by order changes and the top 100 records by ease of update, reaching consensus on which orders to modify. Three physicians reviewed 200 orders, with specialty follow-up as required, and identified 56 orders where dose and/or frequency could be defaulted.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In total, we estimate these changes will decrease approximately 70,000 clicks per year, equating to 700 hours of physician working time<sup>1</sup>. Simply defaulting the admission diagnosis to be the primary problem affected over 7,000 admissions and eliminated 4 clicks per admission to find and enter the primary problem. Additionally, this default saved further physician time by eliminating chart deficiencies that previously required correction when a primary problem was not selected. The second project identified 56 orders (28% of those reviewed) where dose and/or frequency could be defaulted, resulting in 38,712 clicks saved and 31% more efficient ordering. We have expanded the project to further reduce clicks across the organization, including for nursing and allied health professionals.</p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Hill RG, Sears LM, Melanson SW. 4000 clicks: a productivity analysis of electronic medical records in a community hospital ED. <I>Am J Emerg Med.</I> 2013 Nov;<b>31</b>(11):1591&ndash;4.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[James King, W., Audcent, T., Goldbloom, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.270</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.270</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[270 Clicks matter. improving ordering efficiency]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A206</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A206</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A206-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[271 Enhancing parenteral medication safety by using safety II: only double-check if it adds value]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A206-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Parenteral medication errors pose a significant risk to patient safety. Hospitals commonly employ double-checking procedures to minimize errors, although the effectiveness of this practice in reducing harm remains under-evidenced. Compliance with the mandatory double-checking guideline is low due to time constraints and staffing shortages. This disparity between intended practice and actual workflow leaves nurses to assess risks and decide when double-checking is conducted. However, given workforce constraints, it is essential that the time invested by nurses&rsquo; time is well spent and errors are prevented not only for patients but also for nurses who suffer as &lsquo;second victims&rsquo; following an error.</p><p>By adopting a Safety-II approach, with the goal to enhance systems by learning from success, this study aims to learn from actual nursing practices to identify effective safety measures. We hypothesize that focusing double-checks on high-risk situations will enhance medication safety and reduce harm.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>In this controlled before-and-after study risk-based double-checking alongside barcode verification was introduced on a surgical ward in Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+). Parenteral administration practices were observed on one intervention and a comparable control ward.</p><p>High-risk and low-risk administrations were identified by a multidisciplinary team based on potential harm. Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) confirmed that omitting double-checks in low-risk cases was justifiable. The primary outcome of safe administration was defined as correctly verifying six parameters (patient, medication, dose, timing, route, and rate) via barcode or a second nurse in high-risk administrations, and single-checking these in low-risk administrations. High-risk categories included amongst others continuous infusions, oncolytic drugs, and concentrated electrolytes. Observers also recorded the time required for the process. Descriptive analysis was used to show the preliminary results.</p><p>On the intervention ward, nurses were given ownership of the problem, with the overarching goal of enhancing safe administration rather than merely adhering to double-check protocols. Weekly emails provided each nurse with their individual barcode verification rates, and the collective rates were discussed in team meetings.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Safe administration practices on the intervention ward increased from 0% (0/90) to 41% (22/54) after introducing risk-based double checks. This saved approximately 48 minutes of nursing time per day due to the single check for low risk administrations. For comparison, on the control ward in the pre- and post-measurement safe administration percentages were 16% (9/55) and 12% (6/51) respectively.</p><p>For high-risk cases, double-checking compliance increased to 83% (5/6) on the intervention ward, compared to 29% (2/7) on the control ward.</p><p>To conclude, our results suggest that implementing risk-based double-checking, aligned with nurses&rsquo; practical risk assessments, improves both safety and efficiency in medication administration. The Safety-II approach, focusing on realistic nursing practices, seems more effective than strict adherence to national guidelines.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van de Plas, A., Klein, D., Jacobs, J., Olislagers, A., Karapinar, F., Rennenberg, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.271</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.271</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[271 Enhancing parenteral medication safety by using safety II: only double-check if it adds value]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A206</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A207</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A207-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[272 Evaluation of prescribing patterns and use of post-surgical narcotics in children at the childrens hospital of Eastern Ontario]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A207-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Studies have shown that opioids from common pediatric surgical procedures 53&ndash;79.3% of remain unused. Despite recommendations for proper disposal, more than half of patients do not do so and such medications continue to remain in circulation. Our study aims to evaluate the gap in knowledge with regards to what strategies may be needed to address narcotic prescribing.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Eligible patients/families of children &le;18 years of age undergoing common pediatric procedures were approached for their inclusion in the study. An online survey including demographic questions, and questions surrounding use and disposal of narcotics was sent to families 7 days post-surgery.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In our study, 87 patients were included and 93% of patients were prescribed opioids. Of the patients who were prescribed opioids 73% of patients had leftover opioids. For patients who had leftover medications, 41% of patients kept them in storage instead of proper disposal. Following surgery, patients were given instructions on use of opioids 100% of the time but were only given instructions on proper disposal of opioids 53% of the time. When associating provision of instructions for proper disposal of medications, the study rejected null hypothesis, (p= 0.0070). Thus, demonstrating the importance of proper provision of instructions for opioid disposal following surgery.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Our study has demonstrated that there continues to be a large amount of leftover opioids following pediatric surgery. Additionally, our study has demonstrated that provision of instructions for disposal is associated with proper disposal of medications. Further studies may seek to reduce opioid dosing for certain surgical procedures as well as quality improvement studies to provide proper instructions on disposal of opioids to determine whether those changes reduce opioid circulation.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shing, D. Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.272</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.272</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[272 Evaluation of prescribing patterns and use of post-surgical narcotics in children at the childrens hospital of Eastern Ontario]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A207</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A207</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A207-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[273 Nurses perceived autonomy, job satisfaction, and administrative burden with a new short risk screening method versus the standard VMS-screening for nurse-sensitive outcomes; an observational study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A207-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><p>The study is a nursing initiative of 17 inpatient clinical wards at St. Antonius Hospital, a top clinical hospital. These wards provide continuous care to a diverse patient population with varying medical conditions.</p></sec><sec><st>Problem</st><p>The healthcare sector faces staff shortages and rising patient demand, threatening accessible, affordable, high-quality care. Hospitals routinely screen patients admitted over 24 hours with the Dutch VMS screening (Veiligheidsmanagement Systeem) to identify risks. However, nurses often find the process inefficient, time-consuming and sometimes redundant. This inefficiency reduces patient care effectiveness, requiring process optimization.</p><p>Assessment of Problem and Analysis of Its Causes</p><p>In Dutch healthcare, nurse-sensitive outcomes have been developed. Examples include delirium, malnutrition, pain, falls, and pressure ulcers. The VMS screening tool, consisting of 23 questions, is used to measure the risk of these outcomes and implement preventive interventions according to standard protocols. There is an ongoing debate regarding the rigid structure of the VMS protocol limiting nurses&rsquo; autonomy in clinical decision-making, as they were required to follow a set procedure, regardless of their professional judgment about a patient&lsquo;s immediate needs. Nurses cite barriers such as job satisfaction, autonomy, and administrative burden. </p></sec><sec><st>What You Did</st><p>  <I>Intervention:</I>  </p><p>The pilot aimed to implement a shorter, faster screening method while maintaining or increasing quality of care, job satisfaction, autonomy, and reducing administrative burden for nurses. We introduced a new screening method, build in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), to assess the patient complication risks. This method differentiates by age, younger and older than 70 years, and allows nurses to use their clinical judgment. For those patients older than 70 the VMS questionnaire was reduced from 23 to 5 questions, focusing on falls, malnutrition, cognitive issues, and previous delirium episodes.</p><p>  <I>Strategy for change:</I>  </p><p>A successful pilot ran in three clinical departments from October to December 2022, testing the new screening method, led to a hospital-wide implementation in April 2024. During the pilot phase, the teams received targeted training, both digitally and on-site. Diverse and dedicated stakeholder representation in the project team&mdash;nurses, geriatricians, a data analyst, and middle management&mdash;proved crucial for the implementation success. Frequent feedback rounds and close collaboration with lead nurses and the IT professional allowed real-time adjustments, alongside proactive reporting to and receiving formal feedback from the Supervisory Board of the hospital and the Dutch Health and Youth Care Inspectorate.</p><p>  <I>Measurement of improvement:</I>  </p><p>The study employs a prospective observational design with a mixed-method approach, focusing on nurses and nursing students at St. Antonius Hospital. Participants complete surveys before and after implementing the shortened screening, assessing autonomy, registration burden, and job satisfaction. Three focus groups were conducted post-implementation to better understand the quantitative data and discuss the relation between the primary outcomes. Data was analyzed using independent t-tests, Mann-Whitney tests and inductive thematic analysis. Data collection took place from March to October 2024.</p><p>  <I>Please describe how you have involved patients, carers, or family members in the project:</I>  </p><p>During the study, patients, carers, and family members were not directly involved</p></sec><sec><st>What It Means</st><p>  <I>Effects of changes:</I>  </p><p>In the pretest, 174 nurses and nursing students (23%) responded the questionnaire. Most participants in pre- and posttest were between 25 and 35 years old (44% vs. 51%) and mainly female (90% vs 87%). The majority of nurses have been working in their current department for between 0 and 3 years, in pre-test (29%) and posttest (35%). The nurses experience significant more job satisfaction (3.4 vs. 3.8), general autonomy in decision making (3.3 vs. 3.7), procedural autonomy (2.5 vs. 3.1), planning (3.0 vs. 3.5) and lower registration burden (2.7 vs. 3.5) with the new method versus the VMS screening method (p&lt;0.001). The results of the focus groups are currently being analyzed.</p><p>  <I>Lessons learned:</I>  </p><p>It showed to be crucial to involve nurses, paramedics and the Dutch Health and Youth Care Inspectorate in advance to address potential setbacks effectively. Timely allocation of business intelligence capacity was identified as essential to avoid delays in the future. To address the challenges faced in recruiting focus group participants in this study, it is recommended to adjust recruitment strategies by adding new, targeted approaches.</p><p>  <I>Messages for others:</I>  </p><p>The implementation of quality indicators in Dutch healthcare, specifically nursing-sensitive outcomes, significantly impacts patient care. These indicators evaluate nursing quality and guide improvements by identifying vulnerable patients, particularly those over 70, who face higher risks of adverse outcomes. However, challenges like high administrative burdens and limited autonomy for nurses hinder effective screening, potentially affecting care quality. Ensuring that screening processes are efficient and relevant to patient care is crucial for enhancing both job satisfaction, autonomy, registration burden and overall patient outcomes, ultimately leading to a more effective healthcare system.</p></sec><sec><st>Ethics Approval</st><p>This research was proven not to be subject to the Medical Research Involving Humans Act (WMO). Approval is obtained from the participating organization.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suidman, L., Pouw, T., ten Hoorn Boer, D., de Jager, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.273</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.273</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[273 Nurses perceived autonomy, job satisfaction, and administrative burden with a new short risk screening method versus the standard VMS-screening for nurse-sensitive outcomes; an observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A207</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A208</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A210-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[276 Empowering nurses to reduce catheter-related bloodstream infections: an innovative approach using feedback dashboards]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A210-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>This study presents an innovative approach to reducing catheter-related bloodstream infections (BSIs) in an acute care hospital setting. Traditional quarterly statistical reports proved insufficient in improving care and engaging nursing staff. By implementing weekly audits and peer assessments, combined with the use of Power BI feedback dashboards, promising outcomes in reducing BSI rates were achieved.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>In January 2022, weekly catheter audits were initiated on high-incidence units, with immediate feedback provided to nursing staff. In June 2023, a peer assessment system was introduced, involving cross-unit evaluations of catheter care. Results from these assessments were visualized using Power BI feedback dashboards, integrating peer assessment data with electronic patient records (EPR) summaries.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The initial weekly audits effectively captured nurses&rsquo; attention and improved care standards. The introduction of peer assessments increased engagement and fostered a competitive spirit among nurses. Consequently, infection rates dropped from 6 cases per quarter to 0 in some units. Additionally, a 90-day challenge for a specific catheter type extended to 170 days without BSIs for that type of IV catheter. The Power BI dashboards empowered nurses by providing a clear, real-time picture of their performance and outcomes, fostering a sense of ownership and continuous improvement.</p></sec><sec><st>Discussion</st><p>The integration of direct feedback, peer assessment, and innovative use of feedback dashboards proved effective in reducing BSIs and enhancing care quality. Combining EPR data with peer assessments provided a holistic view of care practices, empowering frontline nurses and providing actionable insights. This model can be adapted to other healthcare settings to improve patient safety and quality of care.</p></sec><sec><st>Patient Involvement</st><p>While patients were not directly involved in the conception, design, or implementation of this project, their outcomes and safety were central to evaluating the success of the intervention.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The study highlights that direct feedback, peer assessments, and feedback dashboards are instrumental in reducing BSIs and improving care quality. This approach empowers nurses, enhances patient safety, and provides a comprehensive view of care practices. Further exploration and refinement of this model are warranted, necessitating additional research and funding.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miclaus, C. B., Hecke, J. V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.276</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.276</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[276 Empowering nurses to reduce catheter-related bloodstream infections: an innovative approach using feedback dashboards]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A210</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A210</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A210-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[277 A patient journey to explore lifestyle guidance improvements: an innovative supervision method in the Netherlands]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A210-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Unhealthy lifestyle habits can make people sick. They also increase the chance of someone dying early. More than 20,000 people in the Netherlands die each year from smoking or passive smoking. Half of Dutch adults are overweight. Lifestyle guidance helps people to adopt healthy behavior and is therefore increasingly important in healthcare. As a supervisor, the Dutch Health and Youth Care Inspectorate (DHYI) wants more attention for lifestyle guidance in the daily healthcare practice.</p><p>The DHYI has supervised lifestyle guidance by healthcare professionals in a -for supervision innovative- method of a patient journey. In this project the patients have followed a professional lifestyle guidance program to quit smoking or to obtain a healthier weight. Because healthcare professionals provide lifestyle guidance to patients more often, more people will successfully quit smoking and achieve a healthy weight.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The DHYI has opted for stimulating supervision, viewed from the patient perspective and to look for solutions together with professionals and patients. Therefore, the DHYI worked together with an independent patient advisory organization, Ikone, in co-creating an equal partnership between care professionals and patients.</p><p>More than 40 patients were interviewed and a number of them participated in the client journey method, where they discuss with their own care professionals how they experienced the care and to discuss what went well and what could be improved and how.</p><p>At the beginning, client groups were approached to think about what the inspectorate should look at and these topics were incorporated into the assessment framework. This lead to a number of topics from a patient perspective were included in the assessment framework that would otherwise not have been included.</p><p>During the patient journey, Ikone provided a safe environment for the conversation between patients and care professionals. In this way, care professionals were able to have an open conversation with a number of patients about the quality of their experienced care and how to improve the care .</p><p>The inspectorate also conducted a survey among care providers to ask them how they think about the lifestyle guidance in their region.</p><p>Meetings were then organized in three regions to enter into discussions with the regional professionals. Citizen interest groups were also invited. The three regions where the highest proportion of adults who smoke and/or are overweight live were selected. The inspectorate shared the experiences of the patients and advice from the client journeys and the surveys among the professionals. And facilitated the discussion what the various professionals involved can do to improve care in the region.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The advantage for patients is that the care professionals in the region now know each other better and can make good agreements with each other. For example, patients will now hear more often from their care professional that lifestyle is also important and they will receive good advice on how to do that and finally receive a correct referral where they can be helped if they need help to live a healthier life.</p><p>The inspectorate hopes that doctors will now discuss lifestyle more often with their patients and that they will give concrete advice and refer better. Also, the inspectorate hopes that the collaboration has been strengthened between hospitals, general practitioners, institutions that offer lifestyle guidance such as lifestyle coaches and smoking cessation coaches and dieticians, but also the social domain, which offers exercise or healthy eating clubs, for example.</p><p>Involving patients in the development of innovative stimulating supervision is a rather recent development (Wiig et al., 2020) and this project has proven to be very successful. It is precisely the stories of patients about their experienced care that stimulate care professionals to improve care (Kleefstra et al., 2024). Essential in this is the safe environment, created in this project in collaboration with patient organization Ikone. Furthermore, by bringing care professionals and patients together and having them come up with improvements together, care professionals in a region get to know each other. And in addition, the improvements will hopefully lead to a healthier Dutch population.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Wiig S, Rutz S, Boyd A, Churruca K, Kleefstra S, Haraldseid-Driftland C, Braithwaite J, O&rsquo;Hara J, Bovenkamp van de H. What methods are used to promote patient and family involvement in healthcare regulation? A multiple case study across four counties. <I>BMC Heath Services Research</I> 2020;<b>20</b>:616.</p></li><li><p>Kleefstra SM, Frederiks BJM, Tingen A, Reulings PGJ. The value of experts by experience in social domain supervision in the Netherlands: results from a mystery guests project. <I>BMC Health Services Research</I> 2024;<b>24</b>:187.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reulings, P., Kleefstra, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.277</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.277</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[277 A patient journey to explore lifestyle guidance improvements: an innovative supervision method in the Netherlands]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A210</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A211</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A211-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[278 Enhancing parenteral medication safety by using safety II: only double-check if it adds value]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A211-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Parenteral medication errors pose a significant risk to patient safety. Hospitals commonly employ double-checking procedures to minimize errors, although the effectiveness of this practice in reducing harm remains under-evidenced. Compliance with the mandatory double-checking guideline is low due to time constraints and staffing shortages. This disparity between intended practice and actual workflow leaves nurses to assess risks and decide when double-checking is conducted. However, given workforce constraints, it is essential that the time invested by nurses&rsquo; time is well spent and errors are prevented not only for patients but also for nurses who suffer as &lsquo;second victims&rsquo; following an error.</p><p>By adopting a Safety-II approach, with the goal to enhance systems by learning from success, this study aims to learn from actual nursing practices to identify effective safety measures. We hypothesize that focusing double-checks on high-risk situations will enhance medication safety and reduce harm.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>In this controlled before-and-after study risk-based double-checking alongside barcode verification was introduced on a surgical ward in Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+). Parenteral administration practices were observed on one intervention and a comparable control ward.</p><p>High-risk and low-risk administrations were identified by a multidisciplinary team based on potential harm. Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) confirmed that omitting double-checks in low-risk cases was justifiable. The primary outcome of safe administration was defined as correctly verifying six parameters (patient, medication, dose, timing, route, and rate) via barcode or a second nurse in high-risk administrations, and single-checking these in low-risk administrations. High-risk categories included amongst others continuous infusions, oncolytic drugs, and concentrated electrolytes. Observers also recorded the time required for the process. Descriptive analysis was used to show the preliminary results.</p><p>On the intervention ward, nurses were given ownership of the problem, with the overarching goal of enhancing safe administration rather than merely adhering to double-check protocols. Weekly emails provided each nurse with their individual barcode verification rates, and the collective rates were discussed in team meetings.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Safe administration practices on the intervention ward increased from 0% (0/90) to 41% (22/54) after introducing risk-based double checks. This saved approximately 48 minutes of nursing time per day due to the single check for low risk administrations. For comparison, on the control ward in the pre- and post-measurement safe administration percentages were 16% (9/55) and 12% (6/51) respectively.</p><p>For high-risk cases, double-checking compliance increased to 83% (5/6) on the intervention ward, compared to 29% (2/7) on the control ward.</p><p>To conclude, our results suggest that implementing risk-based double-checking, aligned with nurses&rsquo; practical risk assessments, improves both safety and efficiency in medication administration. The Safety-II approach, focusing on realistic nursing practices, seems more effective than strict adherence to national guidelines.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van de Plas, A., Klein, D., Jacobs, J., Olislagers, A., Karapinar, F., Rennenberg, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.278</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.278</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[278 Enhancing parenteral medication safety by using safety II: only double-check if it adds value]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A211</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A211</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A211-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[279 Evaluating experiences of personalised care for people living with long term conditions using the WASP service evaluation tool]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A211-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction and Aims</st><p>Evaluation is an important step toward achieving the ambition of universally delivered personalised care. The WASP Service Evaluation Tool offers a process through which healthcare teams can better understand the current delivery of personalised care and the factors influencing this.</p><p>This analysis aims to describe the current landscape of personalised care delivery across a range of services and settings within the UK; and to understand the factors influencing this.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>From September 2021 to September 2023, 24 clinical services from multiple disciplines and clinical specialties in the Southeast/Southwest of the UK completed a WASP Service Evaluation and used the findings to identify and implement improvements at a service delivery level. The service user questionnaire asks 25 questions to understand respondents&rsquo; experiences of personalised care delivery and describe services&rsquo; population demographics.</p><p>Responses were coded and weighted to create an index score which represents a service user&rsquo;s experience of personalised care. A combination of descriptive statistics and linear regression were used to analyse trends between experience, presence of long-term conditions and demographic factors.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Data from 353 service users was included in the analysis. One long-term condition was found to have a significant relationship with the index score. Presence of a stroke/TIA resulted in a higher index score, indicating a higher quality experience of personalised care.</p><p>Highest level of qualification attained had a significant relationship with the index score in the cohort who were not under medications management or stroke/TIA teams.</p><p>Demographic factors presented with a bimodal distribution which required the separation of medications management and stroke services to perform linear regression. Of the remaining cohort, the level of qualification respondents attained had a significant relationship with the index score, with higher levels of qualification found to have a lower index score.</p><p>Considerations for further development of the service user questionnaire were highlighted by the progressive data loss in each section; active omission of demographic data; and consideration of how representative the respondents are of local population.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The WASP Service Evaluation can identify statistically significant factors that affect service users&rsquo; experience of personalised care, including the presence of a Stroke/TIA, and the level of qualification respondents had attained. As the dataset grows, these factors can be further explored, leading to improvements in the provision of personalised care.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wood, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.279</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.279</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[279 Evaluating experiences of personalised care for people living with long term conditions using the WASP service evaluation tool]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A211</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A212</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A105?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[141 'Methotrexate without harm - improving the quality of medication records & prescriptions for children with cancer]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A105?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Children receiving treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia at a tertiary oncology centre require multiple admissions for an intravenous infusion of high dose methotrexate. They are admitted and receive intrathecal chemotherapy in the day care unit, and are subsequently transferred to the inpatient ward for high dose methotrexate. The IT software does not allow the creation of a drug chart until they are admitted to the inpatient ward. Ineffective handover of these patients can lead to delays in medications, inappropriate prescriptions or repetition of work. This causes stress for families of children with cancer and consequences for patient safety.</p><p>The extent of the problem was analysed using QI (Quality Improvement) diagnostics, including a bar chart which demonstrated that verbal and/or written handovers of medication were not occurring consistently, with only written handover in around half the cases. A process map demonstrated how ensuring that medications were prescribed was complex (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>). A fishbone diagram helped to understand the problem (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>).</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 141 Figure 1</no><caption><p>High-level process map. This process map demonstrates the complexities and the events/stages required in order to ensure medications are prescribed</p></caption><link locator="141_F1"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 141 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Fishbone diagram. This diagram demonstrates the multifactorial nature of the problem with the different systems, people, processes, environments, equipment, management and materials involved</p></caption><link locator="141_F2"></fig></p><p>Our aim was that 100% of patients should have their medication history documented when clerked prior to transfer, to facilitate completion of a drug chart. The measure for change was defined as how many children had a complete medication history including doses and frequency (score=2), partially complete (score=1) or absent medication history (score=0) in their admission clerking. A baseline measure was established by reviewing 20 consecutive admissions.</p><p>This project was completed as part of the &lsquo;Improve ONE thing: the full QIP Course&rsquo; provided by QIClearn, a blended learning course designed to learn QI experientially, in collaboration with the London School of Paediatrics.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The Model for Improvement was used in order to design and test different change ideas, including a poster to remind doctors to complete a medication history, a quiet zone for prescribing, a leaflet with information about high dose methotrexate and drug interactions, an admission checklist on day care/ward to ensure medication chart is completed, a call to parents reminding them to bring in medications, pharmacy reviews, a proforma with a medication section to complete and information on drug interactions and handover calls from day care to the ward.</p><p>A total of six Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were used to trial change ideas. PDSA cycles were also used to disseminate information and gather feedback from the team. This was achieved via emails, 3 minute pitches, surveys and discussions. Furthermore, feedback was also gained through mentorship and peer feedback via the course.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A trend towards there being more completed medication histories being documented was observed (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F4">figure 4</cross-ref>) following the implementation of PDSA cycles.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F4"><no>Abstract 141 Figure 4</no><caption><p>Run chart on documented medication histories in day care clerkings. This run chart demonstrates how often a completed, partially completed or absent medication history was documented in the admission clerkings. Interventions with PDSA cycles are demonstrated with the circular PDSA symbol (with different colours representing different change ideas)</p></caption><link locator="141_F4"></fig></p><p>The PDSA cycles had varying impacts. A poster was created as the first cycle but appeared to be ineffective and was abandoned. The creation of a leaflet with information about high dose methotrexate and required/contraindicated medications was well received by the team and led to completed medication histories. It was subsequently incorporated into a proforma. The initial results from the proforma demonstrated that this has resulted in an increased proportion of completed medication histories. However, the numbers are small and it cannot yet be determined whether this change will be consistent. Further PDSA cycles are required to determine if a statistically significant and sustainable difference can be achieved.</p><p>There was a lot of learning from completing this project. Problems are multifactorial and diagnostics are very important in understanding the specifics of the problem. Keeping the problem simple, having a robust aim and a clearly defined measure is required for a successful QI project. Engaging the team was challenging. Recruiting people to the project made conducting the project easier, the workload more manageable, and helped to drive enthusiasm. Making a change sustainable proved to be difficult particularly due to reducing interest, shift work and rotational staff. Implementing sustainable changes is key for successful QI.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Middleton, C., Runnacles, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.141</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.141</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[141 'Methotrexate without harm - improving the quality of medication records & prescriptions for children with cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A105</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A106</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A106?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[142 'Safety-II reflection in hospital practice. Process description of the action research on a practical safety-ii tool: the safety-ii reflection cards]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A106?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The Resilience Analysis Grid (RAG) is a Safety-II instrument to evaluate a systems potential for resilient performance based on the four resilience potentials Responding, Monitoring, Learning and Anticipating. Since its development, only a few studies worldwide tried to bring the RAG theory into healthcare practice. In the Netherlands, the Safety-II approach has become central to patient safety in hospitals. However, there are still few instruments available to support reflection on the resilient performance of hospital systems. Given that hospital work is predominantly team-based, hospital teams and their wards provide a valuable starting point for fostering reflection on resilience in healthcare settings. This study aims to identify key factors that facilitate the use of the Resilience Analysis Grid for evaluating resilient performance in hospitals while also introducing Safety-II principles into hospital wards.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>We applied action research methodologies to iteratively experiment with the RAG. In collaboration with healthcare professionals from the SAZ, an association of general hospitals, and Medirisk, a Dutch mutual insurance company, we explored how to apply RAG theory in practice. The study consisted of three phases. Phases 1 and 3 included online workshops with participation from all SAZ-associated hospitals. In Phase 2, we conducted RAG reflection workshops at the emergency wards of five SAZ hospitals, involving medical, nursing, and management staff. Throughout each phase, we observed the workshops and interviewed participants about their experiences with the RAG to identify key elements for its effective use.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We identified several key elements that support the use of the RAG in hospital wards, ultimately leading to the development of the Safety-II reflection cards. These elements include the presence of a multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals in the RAG reflection workshop, a facilitator with expertise in Safety-II principles, and a collaborative selection of a complex procedure for reflection. Additionally, fostering a shared language, cultivating an open culture, ensuring a willingness to dedicate time and space, and recognizing resilient performance as an ongoing work-in-progress are essential for effective implementation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>RAG theory, implemented through the Safety-II reflection cards, offers specific reflection principles that make the Safety-II perspective more practical for healthcare professionals when assessing their work procedures. These principles are particularly useful for complex processes in settings like emergency rooms and intensive care units, where they help strengthen patient safety.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schlinkert, C., Bakker, J., Wimmer, P., Kroeze, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.142</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.142</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[142 'Safety-II reflection in hospital practice. Process description of the action research on a practical safety-ii tool: the safety-ii reflection cards]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A106</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A107</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A111?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[149 Implementation of a new quality framework, delta Q(R), in a Belgian hospital: approach, barriers and facilitators]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A111?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The quality landscape within Belgian hospitals is characterized by a multi-layered approach. In Flanders, Belgium, this is reflected in the &lsquo;Quality-of-Care Triad&rsquo;, established in 2009, which comprises (1) voluntary announced hospital-wide accreditation, (2) mandatory inspection by the Flemish government and (3) measurement and public reporting of selected quality indicators.</p><p>Historically, accreditation by organizations like Joint Commission International (JCI) and Qualicor Europe has been prevalent in Flanders, with many hospitals pursuing accreditation to demonstrate quality and safety. However, concerns have been raised about the perceived value and cost-effectiveness of these external accreditations. Consequently, to better align with their specific needs and priorities, some hospitals, such as AZ Delta, developed their own quality frameworks.</p><p>The standards framework of AZ Delta, Delta Q<sup>&reg;</sup>, is intended for everyone in the organization and aims to encourage reflection on how to contribute to and how to continuously improve the quality of care and services. It consists of two parts. Part A, developed in co-creation with a select group of representatives from each department, outlines standards designed to enable the successful establishment of a robust quality management system (QMS). Part B provides an inventory of the legal frameworks, national and international guidelines.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The implementation of Delta Q<sup>&reg;</sup> involved a cyclical process of self-assessment, gap analysis, and targeted project development, with education and training frequently implemented to bridge identified gaps in knowledge and skills.</p><p>A baseline self-assessment was conducted following the co-creation of the standards. This assessment determined the extent to which existing practices met the newly established expectations. Where gaps were identified, specific projects were defined to address these shortcomings. Progress on these projects was then tracked through quarterly consultations. The self-assessment is repeated annually.</p><p>To support the adoption of Delta Q<sup>&reg;</sup> and ensure organization-wide understanding and buy-in, a comprehensive communication plan was implemented. This included disseminating information through newsletters, providing dedicated training sessions, facilitating discussions during team meetings and organizing symposia, ensuring that all members of the organization were informed about the new quality framework and its expectations.</p><p>The success of implementation is monitored in various ways. Beyond internal self-assessment, audits on the quality framework are performed by internally trained auditors, ensuring independence from the audited department. Further reinforcing this oversight, a set of process and outcome quality indicators is monitored on a quarterly basis, providing ongoing insight into performance.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Based on the yearly self-assessment within the hospitals&rsquo; support departments (facility, HR, finance, IT and infrastructure), by June 2024 - one year after implementing Delta Q<sup>&reg;</sup> - we were able to demonstrate an increase in overall compliance with the standards from 45% to 76%.</p><p>The internal audits allowed us to verify the results of the self-assessment, identify gaps in our compliance with the standards and define key areas for focus in our quality improvement efforts. A total score of at least 80% is expected. In 2024, the target was achieved by 66,67% of the audited departments.</p><p>Since each department has a unique set of quality indicators, carefully selected based on their specific risk profile, the criticality of their processes, and the importance of their outcomes, results are not further clarified in this abstract. The results are used to prioritize areas for improvement and to develop targeted action plans.</p></sec><sec><st>Discussion</st><p>Implementing a QMS requires a holistic approach, recognizing the interconnectedness of various departments, processes, and people. During the implementation of Delta Q<sup>&reg;</sup>, the following success factors and barriers were identified:</p><p>Success factors</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Active employee involvement, empowering them to define projects to meet the standards and increasing intrinsic motivation</p></li><li><p>Project monitoring on a quarterly basis through one-on-one meetings with representatives from each department to ensure progress</p></li><li><p>Interdepartmental alignment to ensure efficient collaboration</p></li><li><p>Clearly defined key performance indicators and quality goals</p></li><li><p>Regular audits</p></li><li><p>Regular and adequate training on QMS principles and their roles in maintaining quality</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Barriers</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Staff shortages which hinder our ability to work on quality improvement projects</p></li><li><p>Inadequate dissemination of information within the team regarding areas of concern and quality improvement initiatives, which hampers team effectiveness and progress on quality improvements</p></li></l></p><p>In the next phase (2025&ndash;2026), we will further invest in establishing a robust QMS and monitor the effects of increased compliance with the standards. We will also invite an external accreditation body to evaluate both our framework and its compliance.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goossens, J., Carlier, E., Vanrolleghem, S., ten Haaf, N., Brabant, P., Devos, E., Harlet, L., Hellings, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.149</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.149</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[149 Implementation of a new quality framework, delta Q(R), in a Belgian hospital: approach, barriers and facilitators]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A111</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A111</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A115?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[156 Driving a chain reaction: a quality improvement and research led approach to optimising the non-surgical management of hip osteoarthritis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A115?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Osteoarthritis (OA) is a long-term degenerative condition in older people which leads to chronic pain and long-term disability, and it is estimated that 3.2 million people in the UK have osteoarthritis of the hip. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines advise that management of moderate hip OA should involve education and advice, aerobic exercise and muscle strengthening, and weight loss if applicable; however, they offer no specific guidance on types of exercise, the dose, intensity or delivery model.</p><p>The aim was to develop an intervention, in accordance with NICE guidelines, to equip patients with hip OA with the confidence to self-manage their condition and increase their ability to perform daily activities. The programme of work was conceived by a consultant orthopaedic surgeon and physiotherapist and was undertaken by a general hospital in collaboration with a local university in the south of England, in a conurbation with a high percentage of people aged over 65.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A survey by the research team revealed significant variation in physiotherapy treatment across the UK and no agreed standard on how to provide care in accordance with NICE guidelines.<sup>1</sup> The CHAIN programme was therefore developed, a 6-week programme at a local leisure centre, including a weekly 30-minute education session led by a physiotherapist and 30 minutes of static cycling.</p><p>Between 2013&ndash;2015, 119 participants were referred by GPs to CHAIN as part of a Quality Improvement (QI) project.<sup>2</sup> In 2018&ndash;2019, 270 patients from orthopaedic outpatients joined a QI replication study.<sup>3</sup> NIHR funding then supported the 2020&ndash;2023 randomised controlled trial (RCT), with 221 participants comparing CHAIN to usual physiotherapy care.<sup>4</sup>  </p><p>A Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) forum<sup>5</sup> and patient feedback enabled investigators to fine tune the intervention for each iteration, and resulted in CHAIN being extended to 8 weeks and the education section updated for the RCT. A Patient Advisory Group was part of the Trial Management team for the RCT. They advised on trial design, documentation, recruitment, interpretation of findings and dissemination.</p><p>Participants were assessed pre- and post-CHAIN in the QI studies, with the RCT adding a three-month follow-up once treatment had finished.</p><p>Ethical approval was not required for the initial quality improvement work. Approvals were received from the South Central &ndash; Oxford C Research Ethics Committee and Health Research Authority for the RCT.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The QI studies showed improvements in pain, function, and quality of life for CHAIN participants.<sup>2 3</sup> The RCT found improvements in participants&rsquo; reported ability to perform activities of daily living for both the CHAIN arm and those having usual physiotherapy care, although CHAIN showed a statistically significant larger improvement than usual physiotherapy.<sup>6</sup> The improvement in both arms reduced three months after treatment. CHAIN was also found to be cost-effective when compared with usual physiotherapy care. Findings from the RCT have been submitted for publication.<sup>6</sup>  </p><p>CHAIN has been shown to significantly improve functional outcomes and reduce pain for patients with hip OA, and is cost-effective. Physiotherapists can adopt CHAIN to offer a structured treatment alternative, leading to immediate improvements in mobility and pain management. CHAIN can also decrease the reliance on more expensive treatments such as surgery or prolonged physiotherapy sessions, leading to a more efficient use of healthcare resources.</p><p>Whilst CHAIN offers promising results, the reduction in treatment effect observed at the three-month follow-up suggests that ongoing support may be necessary to sustain benefits. Future research could explore strategies to maintain long-term outcomes, explore how to increase the generalisability of findings, and address any barriers to adherence.</p></sec><sec><st>Funding</st><p>This work was funded initially by the Dorset Clinical Commissioning Group, Active Dorset and the Bournemouth Council with further funding from University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust (UHD) and the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) under its Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Programme (Grant Reference Number PB-PG-0816-20033). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Low M, Immins T, Wainwright T. Snapshot survey of physiotherapy practice for patients with hip osteoarthritis in the public sector. <I>European Journal of Physiotherapy</I> 2017;<b>20</b>:101&ndash;108.</p></li><li><p>Wainwright TW, Immins T, Middleton RG. A cycling and education programme for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis: a quality improvement study. <I>International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing</I> 2016;<b>23</b>:14&ndash;24.</p></li><li><p>Wainwright TW, Burgess LC, Immins T, <I>et al</I>. A cycling and education intervention for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis: A quality improvement replication programme. <I>SAGE Open Medicine</I> 2020;<b>8</b>:2050312120946522.</p></li><li><p>Wainwright TW, Parkinson EP, Immins T, <I>et al</I>. CycLing and EducATion (CLEAT): protocol for a single centre randomised controlled trial of a cycling and education intervention versus standard physiotherapy care for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis. <I>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders</I> 2023;<b>24</b>:344.</p></li><li><p>Andrews LM, Allen H, Sheppard ZA, <I>et al</I>. More than just ticking a box...how patient and public involvement improved the research design and funding application for a project to evaluate a cycling intervention for hip osteoarthritis. <I>Res Involv Engagem</I>. 2015;<b>1</b>:13.</p></li><li><p>Wainwright TW, Immins T, Docherty S, <I>et al</I>. A CycLing and EducATion Intervention versus usual physiotherapy care for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis (CLEAT): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial of clinical and cost-effectiveness. <I>Lancet Rheumatol</I> Submitted - In Review</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wainwright, T. W., Immins, T., Low, M., Creasey, J., Middleton, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.156</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.156</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[156 Driving a chain reaction: a quality improvement and research led approach to optimising the non-surgical management of hip osteoarthritis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A115</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A116</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A117?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[159 Improving bedtime routine to enhance child and parent well-being: a quality improvement initiative]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A117?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>This Quality Improvement (QI) project was conducted in a home setting during maternity leave and focused on improving the bedtime routine for my two children, aged 3 and 7. Chronic late bedtimes were contributing to overtiredness, impacting their school performance and behaviour, and increasing my stress as a parent. The project formed part of a four-month QIClearn blended learning course, which supports participants in designing and delivering a full QI project with mentorship.</p><p>Adequate sleep is crucial for children&rsquo;s emotional regulation, attention, learning, and physical health. Sleep deprivation is linked with behavioural issues, poor academic outcomes, and increased parental stress. National guidelines recommend early and consistent bedtimes for school-aged children to optimise developmental outcomes.<sup>1 2</sup>Quality Improvement models like the Model for Improvement have been widely used to drive changes in both clinical and non-clinical settings.<sup>3</sup>  </p><p>The specific problem addressed was that my children were consistently going to bed around 21:30, later than recommended. This was associated with poor sleep quality, behavioural issues, and reduced school performance, alongside heightened parental frustration. The aim was to establish a consistent bedtime routine that ensured both children were in bed by 20:30 on weekdays. The primary outcome measure was the time the children were in bed each evening, with daily data collected and tracked using a run chart.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>The Model for Improvement was used to structure the project, including setting a SMART aim, identifying measures, and testing change ideas using Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Five PDSA cycles were completed, each focusing on testing and refining one or more interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Change ideas tested included</st><p>Preparing meals in advance to reduce delays</p><p>Rescheduling after-school activities (e.g. soccer)</p><p>Establishing a structured bedtime routine</p><p>Using bedtime stories and calming activities</p><p>Introducing an incentive system</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The project successfully achieved its SMART aim. Within two weeks, children were consistently in bed by 20:30 on weekdays. The run chart shows a statistically significant and sustained improvement in bedtime adherence over 45 days. There was a noticeable shift in bedtime from the baseline median of 21:30 to the target time of 20:30, with little variation</p><p>The most effective interventions included meal prepping and a consistent bedtime routine. The incentive system required some adjustment to remain effective. Involving my husband in the planning and using frequent data reviews contributed to the project&rsquo;s success. Engaging the children later in the process helped improve their cooperation.</p></sec><sec><st>Lessons Learned</st><p>Structured planning and regular data collection were essential for real-time adjustment and improvement. Using the QIClearn structured course in a personal setting was highly effective, demonstrating that QI principles can support both professional and personal wellbeing. If repeated, I would engage the children earlier to encourage more active participation.</p></sec><sec><st>Messages for Others</st><p>Parents can be empowered to use QI skills to improve their own family routines and outcomes. This project illustrates how structured, data-driven approaches&mdash;commonly used in clinical environments&mdash;can also bring substantial benefits in home settings. The learnings have relevance for broader community and behavioural health strategies.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Beebe DW. Cognitive, behavioural, and functional consequences of inadequate sleep in children and adolescents. <I>Pediatric Clinics of North America</I> 2011;<b>58</b>(3):649&ndash;665.</p></li><li><p>Mindell JA, and Owens JA. 2015. A Clinical Guide to Pediatric Sleep. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins.</p></li><li><p>Langley GJ, <I>et al</I>. 2009. The Improvement Guide: A Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhakata, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.159</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.159</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[159 Improving bedtime routine to enhance child and parent well-being: a quality improvement initiative]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A117</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A118</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A119?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[162 Improving the time for patients to get echocardiogram from the point of referral]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A119?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Context</st><p>This quality improvement project was done in cardiology department, Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Trust, Grimsby, Lincolnshire, from July 2021 to February 2022.</p></sec><sec><st>Problem</st><p>We identified that the echocardiogram referral to assessment time was too high. Which delayed decision making in management of patients and overall patient care.</p></sec><sec><st>1st Cycle</st><p>We did retrospective analysis of all patients who were referred for echocardiogram from 1st July 2021 to 31st August 2021.</p><p>We undertook baseline measurement of 69 patients during the time and the average time to get echocardiogram from the day of referral was <b>3.74 days</b>.</p><p>Assessment of Problem and Analysis of its Causes</p><p>The main problem behind longer waiting time to get echocardiogram was lack of information on the referral cards and use of paper-based referral cards which took longer to reach cardiology department due to logistic issues.</p></sec><sec><st>Intervention</st><p>We developed e-referral system for echocardiograms and included necessary information as mandatory fields (as shown in <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>) in the e-referrals to reduce rejections of echocardiogram requests.</p><p>Educating staff members on how to request e-referrals for echocardiogram and key information needed to request e-referral.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 162 Figure 1</no><caption><p>E-referral form introduced for echocardiogram requests</p></caption><link locator="162_F1"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>2nd Cycle/Measurement of Improvement</st><p>A 2nd cycle of audit was done between 1st October 2021 to 30th November 2021 to assess waiting times for echocardiogram following introduction of e-referral system and education of staff regarding echocardiogram referrals. A total of 72 patients were included in the 2nd cycle. The average waiting time reduced to <b>0.92</b> days.</p></sec><sec><st>3rd Cycle/Measurement of Improvement</st><p>A 3rd cycle of audit was done in February 2022, the results showed similar patterns of improvement in average waiting times for requested echocardiograms.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 162 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Awaiting echocardiograms (no of days) &ndash; pre and post introduction of e-referral system</p></caption><link locator="162_F2"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Effects of Changes</st><p>Implementation of electronic echocardiogram referral system trust wide which not only reduced the waiting times for echocardiogram but also made whole process of requesting echocardiograms more efficient and easier. Hence, improving waiting times, streamlining the echo request and finally improving patient care by reducing number of days to 0.92 = 1 day. Paper based echocardiogram requests cards were discarded which is environment friendly move.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siddique, R., Anjum, F., Khan, R., Jan, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.162</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.162</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[162 Improving the time for patients to get echocardiogram from the point of referral]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A119</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A120</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A120?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[163 Improving accuracy in identifying paediatric patients at nutrition risk and reducing false positives in nutrition screening: a quality improvement project in IHH hospital Singapore]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A120?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><p>The project is owned by dietitians and supported by nursing team in Mount Elizabeth Novena Hospital (MENH) paediatric ward 6P. Pilot study was conducted in Ward 6P. The group of patients involved in this study were paediatric patients admitted to Ward 6P.</p></sec><sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The percentage of children admitted to the hospital with malnutrition is significant hence it is important to identify nutritional risk early and implement nutritional management.<sup>1</sup> Paediatric nutrition screening tool used in IHH hospitals was not able to identify patients&rsquo; nutrition risk accurately.</p><p>Baseline data collected between January to June 2024 showed high rate of false positives. A team comprises of dietitians, nursing managers of ward 6P was formed. The purpose of the quality improvement project was to 1) improve the accuracy in identifying the patients who are truly at nutrition risk 2) reducing the number of false positive cases.</p><p>Root cause analysis using &lsquo;5 whys&rsquo; analysis found that accuracy of IHH nutrition screening tool was in question. Validity of IHH nutrition screening tool assessed against gold standard, P-SGNA, showed fair agreement (<I></I>-score: 0.32, n=31). Discussions with stakeholders involving dietitians, nursing directors, nursing managers and doctors were conducted to present the findings and change in nutrition screening tool was proposed.</p></sec><sec><st>Methodology</st><p>Multiple validated paediatric nutrition screening tools were reviewed. Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Paediatrics (STAMP) was identified as it showed Grade I evidence.<sup>2</sup> Validity of STAMP assessed against P-SGNA showed a substantial agreement (<I></I>-score: 0.62, n=31). STAMP was subsequently modified to improve specificity (<I></I>-score: 0.93, almost perfect agreement, n=31).</p><p>A pilot study using Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) method was implemented between September 2024 to January 2025. Training sessions for nurses on the use of the new screening tool were conducted using PowerPoint slides. Inter-rater reliability was assessed between dietitian and nurses.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A pre-post implementation study was compared. The primary measure was the percentage reduction in false positive cases. Secondary measure was the percentage reduction in total number of cases triggered by nutrition screening tool.</p><p>A total number of 588 paediatric patients were admitted from October 2024 to January 2025. Results showed that the false positive cases reduced from 58.6% to 29.4%. Total triggered cases decreased from a median of 10.5% to 3.8%. Inter-rater reliability between dietitian and nurses has substantial agreement (PABAK score: 0.78, n=130), indicating good inter-rater reliability.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>We hope to enhance doctors&rsquo; trust by reducing false positive cases, leading to increase in referrals for dietitian interventions and improves patient care. Reducing redundancy from false positives could also help to improve efficiency.</p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Joosten, Hulst. Nutritional screening tools for hospitalized children: methodological considerations. <I>Clinical Nutrition</I> 2014;<b>33</b>:1&ndash;5.</p></li><li><p>Evidenced Analysis Library, Nutrition Screening Pediatrics: Nutrition Screening Pediatrics (NSP) Systematic Review (2017&ndash;2018), Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics 2022.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yee, J. M. E., Lim, K. B., Shen, G. Q.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.163</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.163</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[163 Improving accuracy in identifying paediatric patients at nutrition risk and reducing false positives in nutrition screening: a quality improvement project in IHH hospital Singapore]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A120</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A121</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A123?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[168 Improving pleural procedure safety and coding through standardised documentation: the experience of a UK district general hospital]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A123?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>In the United Kingdom, elective pleural interventions have the potential to generate revenue for trusts when performed in the ambulatory or elective setting through Health Resource Group (HRG) tariffs.<sup>1</sup> However, only 12% of UK hospitals currently provide pleural outpatient services of a suitable size compared to local patient need.<sup>2</sup>  </p><p>The expansion of a given service is supported by the number of locally coded patient events. As such, accurate clinical coding is essential. Furthermore, quality-assured and safe delivery of procedures requires compliance with evidence-based guidelines.</p><p>We therefore conducted an audit of pleural procedures to gain an understanding of: 1) the true demand for pleural interventions in our hospital, and 2) the compliance of performed procedures with local and British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines.<sup>3</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>To establish the official view of pleural services performed, data was acquired from the Coding and Contracts Departments, looking for codes corresponding to pleural interventions and tariffs in the months of February and July 2024 (n=58 patients). Local pleural guidelines warrant a post-procedure X-ray to check drain position.<sup>4</sup> Thus, to understand the true demand for pleural procedures, we acquired all adult hospital chest X-ray requests and created our own log of pleural interventions for the same period.</p><p>Pleural procedure documentation was audited against the hospital&rsquo;s local chest drain policy, and the BTS pleural guidance 2023.<sup>3 5</sup>  </p><p>To address both the accuracy of pleural procedure coding and patient safety, we created a pleural procedure e-proforma. The hypothesis was that this would standardise documentation, improve intra- and post-procedure care, and facilitate better procedure coding by non-clinical staff. The e-proforma was publicised through posters and emails, as well as cross-departmental teaching.</p><p>Compliance with the e-proforma was measured weekly. Secondly, the percentage of correctly-coded cases was re-audited at six months. We set a SMART aim of 75% concordance with these parameters over six months.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Only 19% of the pleural interventions audited were recognised in formal coding, illustrating a discrepancy in pleural coding. An additional 47 cases were identified through alternate analysis of X-rays. The majority (71%) of cases were managed as emergency admissions, with a mean of 6.6 inpatient days for chest drain management.</p><p>Documentation of post-procedure care, use of image-guided intervention, and appropriate fluid analysis were lacking in the majority of non-respiratory clinical areas.</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>17% had no documented use of imaging techniques before chest drain insertion</p></li><li><p>34% had no documented post procedure care plan</p></li><li><p>36% had no clear instructions for draining of pleural fluid or pneumothorax</p></li><li><p>57% of documentation did not mention observed or potential side effects of breathlessness, coughing, or pain.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Accurate pleural procedure coding is essential to support service expansion to meet patient demand.</p></li><li><p>Cross-specialty collaboration is crucial to improve education and buy-in, and streamline service implementation.</p></li><li><p>The e-proforma serves as a strong visual aid and checklist, ensuring appropriate intra- and post-procedure care, as well as investigation of pleural pathology according to national guidelines.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Allen M. Respiratory Medicine GIRFT Programme National Specialty Report March 2021. NHS England - Getting It Right First Time; 2021 Mar p. 10. Available from: https://gettingitrightfirsttime.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Respiratory-Medicine-Oct21L.pdf</p></li><li><p>Stanton A, Evison M. British Thoracic Society National Pleural Services Organisational Audit Report 2021. British Thoracic Society Reports; 2022 Aug. Available from: https://www.brit-thoracic.org.uk/media/455963/bts-pleural-service-organisational-audit-national-report-final-v2.pdf</p></li><li><p>Asciak R, Bedawi EO, Bhatnagar R, Clive AO, Hassan M, Lloyd H, <I>et al</I>. British thoracic society clinical statement on pleural procedures.<I> Thorax</I> 2023 Jul 1;<b>78</b>(Suppl 3):s43&ndash;68. Available from: https://thorax.bmj.com/content/78/Suppl_3/s43</p></li><li><p>Hunt R, Soar B. LocSSIP Guideline for Chest Drain Insertion. Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust; 2024 Jul. Available from: https://doclibrary-rcht.cornwall.nhs.uk/DocumentsLibrary/RoyalCornwallHospitalsTrust/Clinical/CriticalCareAndResuscitation/LocSSIPGuidelineForChestDrainInsertion.pdf</p></li><li><p>Roberts ME, Rahman NM, Maskell NA, Bibby AC, Blyth KG, Corcoran JP, <I>et al</I>. British thoracic society guideline for pleural disease. <I>Thorax</I> 2023 Jul 1;<b>78</b>(Suppl 3):s1&ndash;42. Available from: https://thorax.bmj.com/content/78/Suppl_3/s1</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bhatkal, S., Potton, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.168</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.168</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[168 Improving pleural procedure safety and coding through standardised documentation: the experience of a UK district general hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A123</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A124</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A126?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[171 Minimizing the use of severe restraint: a quality improvement project in a Dutch academic hospital]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A126?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><p>Author has seen the licence applied to conference abstracts published by BMJ and agrees.</p></sec><sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The definition of restraint use in the Netherlands is &lsquo;interventions that have restrictive consequences for the individual freedom of patients&rsquo;.<sup>1 2</sup> These interventions can have physical and psychological effects on patients and should therefore only be used when unavoidable, and in accordance with guidelines and regulations.<sup>3&ndash;7</sup> Accurate documentation is essential for gaining insight into restraint use, but this is often lacking. This is something we also encountered in our improvement project. For that reason, we focused first on improving documentation to gain accurate data regarding actual restraint use.</p><p>This project aims was to improve the registration of restraint use on adults at the regular nursing wards of the Maastricht UMC+ by 25% by March 2024. The desired impact is a reduction in the use of restraints and ensuring that they are applied only when necessary, and at the right time, by the right person, for the right patient, and in accordance with the guideline from the Professional association of nurses in the Netherlands (V&amp;VN, Verpleegkundigen &amp;Verzorgenden Nederland<sup>1</sup>). The intended goal is to achieve this in the MUMC+ by 2026.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>To map the problem, we used qualitative data (interviews with healthcare professionals and patients, a thematic audit, a survey and other hospital&rsquo;s experiences) and quantitative data (file research).</p><p>After analysing outcomes, a multifactorial intervention was initiated in co-creation with the multidisciplinary project team (which also includes a patient representative).<sup>8&ndash;9</sup> This included interventions regarding the hospital system, healthcare professionals knowledge, and patient experiences.</p><p>Registration was optimized to understand the use of restrictive interventions. The equipment lending process was fully centralized, and several materials were replaced. Interventions were implemented to enhance knowledge regarding restraint use among medical and nursing staff. These include: publication of an interactive protocol supporting decision making (accessible via QR codes), training on applying restraints, clinical lessons for medical departments, storytelling of patient experiences, updates to patient information, and an interactive escape room.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Completed registration forms were reviewed and compared to listings on borrowed equipment (<cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>). The accuracy and completeness of the filled-out registration forms (<cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T2">table 2</cross-ref>) was examined. This was repeated multiple times.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 171 Table 1</no><caption><p>Overview of documentation borrowed materials</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>T0</b>  <br>  <b>Sample years 2019</b> and 2022 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>T1</b>  <br>  <b>18 Sep. 2023 &ndash; 1 Nov. 2023</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>T2</b>  <br>  <b>1 Dec. 2023 &ndash; 1 Jan. 2024</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>T3</b>  <br>  <b>1 Mar. 2024- 1 Apr. 2024</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>T4</b>  <br>  <b>1 May 2024 &ndash; 1 June 2024</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="6" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Total Registration forms </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">48 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">64 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">52 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">59 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">69 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Registration forms borrowed materials </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">48 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">50 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">46 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">53 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">52 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Borrowed restraints </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Not known </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">131 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">107 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">104 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">100 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">All restraints </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Not Known </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">149 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">128 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">123 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">126 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">% registration form borrowed materials </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Cannot be calculated </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">38,2% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">43% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">51% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">52% </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p><tbl id="T2" loc="float"><no>Abstract 171 Table 2</no><caption><p>Overview of correctly filled out registration forms</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>T0</b>  <br>  <b>Sample years 2019</b> and 2022 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>T1</b>  <br>  <b>18 Sep. 2023 &ndash; 1 Nov. 2023</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>T2</b>  <br>  <b>1 Dec. 2023 &ndash; 1 Jan. 2024</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>T3</b>  <br>  <b>1 Mar. 2024- 1 Apr. 2024</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>T4</b>  <br>  <b>1 May 2024 &ndash; 1 June 2024</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="6" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Registration forms filled out correctly </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">37 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">18 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">33 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">30 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Number of registration forms </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">48 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">64 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">52 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">59 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">69 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">% registration forms correctly filled oud </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">57,8% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">34,6% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">55,9% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">43,5% </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p>Documentation of restraint use at regular nursing wards has increased, however, not all utilized materials are recorded (<cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref> and 2). By improving the registration process, awareness of applying restraints increased. The urgency to share responsibility between doctors and nurses has become more clear. Additionally, obtaining consent of patients and/or their legal representatives has increased. In January 2025, nurse consultants for restraint use started. They will ensure proper documentation and enhance the knowledge of healthcare professionals (by bedside teaching), also incorporating this as a critical performance indicator.</p><p>Improving restraint use is an ongoing effort and will continue in the coming years at Maastricht UMC+.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Verkerk M, redacteur. Vrijheidsbeperking in het ziekenhuis? Nee, tenzij... Utrecht: V&amp;VN; 2013. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.venvn.nl/media/kiadilie/web_venvn_handl_vbi-1.pdf</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Inspectie gezondheidszorg en Jeugd. Basisset medisch specialistische zorg 2023: voor ziekenhuizen en particuliere klinieken. Den Haag: Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport; 2022. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">Basisset Medisch Specialistische Zorg 2023 | Indicatorenset | Inspectie Gezondheidszorg en Jeugd (igj.nl)</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Mohr W, Petti T, Mohr B. Adverse effects associated with physical restraint. <I>Can J Psychiatry</I>. 2003 June;<b>48</b>(5):330&ndash;337. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370304800509</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Evans D, Wood J, Lambert L. Patient injury and psysical restraint devices: a systematic review.<I> J Adv Nurs</I>. 2003 Feb;<b>41</b>(3):274&ndash;282. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02501.x</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Thomann S, redacteur. Restraint use in somatoc acute care hospitals: Do we need to care?. Maastricht: Publiss; 2023.</p></li><li><p>Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en koninkrijksrelaties. Wet op de beroepen in de individuele gezondheidszorg: Hoofdstuk VII. Tuchtrechtspraak. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0006251/2015-01-01/1#HoofdstukVII</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en koninkrijksrelaties. Burgerlijk Wetboek Boek 7: Afdeling 5. De overeenkomst inzake geneeskundige behandeling. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0005290/2020-07-01/#Boek7_Titeldeel7_Afdeling5</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Ko&#x0308;pke S, Mu&#x0308;hlhauser I, Gerlach A, Haut A, Haastert B, Mo&#x0308;hler R, <I>et al</I>. Effect of a guideline-based multicomponent intervention on use of physical restraints in nursing homes: a randomized controlled trial. <I>JAMA</I>. 2012 May;<b>307</b>(20):2177&ndash;2184. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.4517</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Koczy P, Becker C, Rapp K, Klie T, Beische D, Bu&#x0308;chele G, <I>et al</I>. Effectiveness of a multifactorial intervention to reduce physical restraints in nursing home residents.<I> J Am Geriatr Soc</I>. 2011 Feb;<b>59</b>(2):333&ndash;339. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03278.x</inter-ref>  </p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boer, L. d.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.171</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.171</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[171 Minimizing the use of severe restraint: a quality improvement project in a Dutch academic hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A126</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A127</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A128?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[174 Changing trust guidelines platform for anaesthetics & ICU in Torbay hospital, UK]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A128?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Adherence to local trust guidelines and protocols is an essential aspect of best medical practice. Previously, with the microbiology guidelines, all trust guidelines were accessible only via the Trust&rsquo;s intranet ICON through Microsoft SharePoint on a Trust device. However, access to a computer is often limited in clinical settings, while access to a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) remains necessary.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim</st><p>This project aimed to improve the accessibility of local trust guidelines for the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and Anaesthetics Department over a 10-month period by migrating their specific guidelines to MicroGuide, a platform already in use for antimicrobial guidelines, which is accessible on smartphones and tablet devices.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>Two Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were implemented. The first phase involved surveying each department to evaluate their perceptions and usage of the existing platform. Guidelines were then migrated to the new platform, MicroGuide, and promotional posters were displayed in both departments. After one month, staff were resurveyed to assess their usage and opinions of the new platform, as well as to gather suggestions for further improvements. These recommendations were incorporated into the next cycle.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Pre-migration survey data showed that ICU and Anaesthetics staff accessed guidelines an average of 2.12 times per week. Although 100% of staff knew how to access guidelines via ICON, 88% reported that they found the system insufficiently accessible. Additionally, 92% stated they would use the guidelines more frequently if access were easier, with 75% preferring access via their phone.</p><p>Following implementation, resurvey results demonstrated an increase in guideline usage to an average of 3.7 times per week. 91% of staff found MicroGuide easier to use than ICON and preferred accessing guidelines through it. Suggestions for improvement focused primarily on refining the structure by creating sub-sections to enhance navigation, a feature more feasible on the new platform. Plans were made to implement these changes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The migration of trust guidelines to MicroGuide successfully improved accessibility and usability for ICU and Anaesthetics staff. The increased frequency of guideline usage and strong preference for the new platform demonstrates the effectiveness of this intervention. This project highlights the role of technology in enhancing clinical guideline accessibility. Future efforts will focus on optimising navigation and expanding the initiative to other departments to ensure sustainable adoption.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hargreaves, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.174</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.174</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[174 Changing trust guidelines platform for anaesthetics & ICU in Torbay hospital, UK]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A128</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A129</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A129?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[175 Checked or not checked? That is the question? Improving endotracheal tube (ETT) documentation to support the reduction of unplanned extubations in a neonatal intensive care unit]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A129?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Unplanned extubation (UE) is a significant safety incident in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), associated with increased morbidity and mortality. At Leeds General Infirmary (LGI), two serious events prompted a wider QI programme aiming to make UE a &lsquo;never event&rsquo;. As part of this, we launched a focused project to improve documentation of routine endotracheal tube (ETT) stability checks&mdash;specifically the ETT flag and the push-in/pull-out test&mdash;by doctors and advanced neonatal practitioners (ANPs) on NICU daily summary sheets.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim</st><p>To improve documentation of ETT checks on the daily NICU summary sheet to 100% over a 4-month period, as a practical, measurable contribution to reducing unplanned extubations.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This QI project used the Model for Improvement and ran for four months, with multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Measures included:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Daily review of documentation in NICU summaries for ventilated babies</p></li><li><p>Fortnightly physical spot checks for presence of ETT flags</p></li><li><p>Inclusion: Babies ventilated for more than 24 hours</p></li></l></p><p>Tested change ideas included:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Direct one-to-one engagement with junior doctors and ANPs, who complete the documentation</p></li><li><p>Consultant-led reinforcement during daily rounds</p></li><li><p>Laminated UE tracker posters in key clinical areas</p></li><li><p>Barcode system to streamline UE reporting</p></li><li><p>WhatsApp reminders to the team (limited uptake)</p></li></l></p><p>Although nurses were not responsible for documentation, they deliver daily ETT care and were key contributors to reducing UE. Their increased training and awareness of the focus on ETT checks significantly supported the overall cultural and clinical shift toward safer ventilation practices.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>No meaningful improvement was seen in the first two months. In July, increased awareness led to better UE reporting. In August, documentation of ETT checks improved significantly, and no unplanned extubations were recorded until the final day of the month. These outcomes aligned with the rollout of several successful PDSA cycles and enhanced team engagement.</p><p>The most impactful elements included</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Face-to-face trainee engagement and consultant consistency</p></li><li><p>High-visibility laminated trackers and the barcode reporting system</p></li><li><p>Direct contributions from nursing staff, whose daily ventilator care and awareness of the initiative supported a shared commitment to UE prevention <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>.</p></li></l></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 175 Figure 1</no><link locator="175_F1"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Improving documentation of ETT checks can serve as both a proxy for good clinical practice and a contributor to the reduction of unplanned extubations. This QI project highlights the importance of clear expectations, visual tools, and a multidisciplinary approach&mdash;including active nursing involvement&mdash;in driving change. The work remains ongoing as part of a larger NICU-wide programme to eliminate UE as a safety event.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Bertoni C, Briana MD, MBOE, Bartman Thomas. A quality improvement approach to reduce unplanned extubation in the NICU while avoiding sedation and restraints.<I> Pediatric Quality and Safety</I> 2020;<inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">  <b>5</b>(5):e346 </inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p><inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">Kristin Melton</inter-ref>, <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">Caitlin Ryan</inter-ref>, <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">Angela Saunders</inter-ref>, <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">Julie Zix</inter-ref>. Reducing pediatric unplanned extubation across multiple icus using quality improvement. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35490283/</p></li><li><p>Assessment of an unplanned extubation bundle to reduce unplanned extubations in critically Ill neonates, infants, and children. <I>JAMA Pediatrics</I> June 2020;<b>174(</b>6):517&ndash;628.</p></li><li><p>Igo DA, Kingsley KM, Malaspina EM, Picarillo AP. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">Decreasing unplanned extubations in the neonatal ICU.</inter-ref>  <I>Respir Care</I>. 2021 Jul;<b>66</b>(7):1059&ndash;1062. doi: 10.4187/respcare.08203. Epub 2021 May 11.PMID: 33975898</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Summary for Conference Programme or Slide</st><p>This quality improvement project aimed to improve documentation of endotracheal tube (ETT) checks&mdash;specifically ETT flags and push-in/pull-out tests&mdash;by doctors and ANPs in the NICU at Leeds General Infirmary. Over a 4-month period, the team implemented several PDSA cycles, including trainee engagement, consultant reinforcement, visual trackers, and a barcode reporting system. While early progress was limited, the final six weeks saw improved documentation and a reduction in unplanned extubations. Nursing staff played a direct role in improving outcomes through daily ventilator care. This project contributed to the unit&rsquo;s broader aim of making unplanned extubation a &lsquo;never event&rsquo;.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abbas, N., Shearer, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.175</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.175</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[175 Checked or not checked? That is the question? Improving endotracheal tube (ETT) documentation to support the reduction of unplanned extubations in a neonatal intensive care unit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A129</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A130</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A130?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[176 Development of a quality dashboard to examine the timeliness of clinical discharge letters in a top clinical hospital in the Netherlands]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A130?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><p>Medisch Spectrum Twente (MST) is one of the largest top-clinical teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Approximately 3500 employees are committed to promoting health in close cooperation with its regional healthcare partners. In the region, MST is continuously working on the development of a suitable, efficient and sustainable healthcare provision. In addition, supra-regional collaborations in the field of science and (technological) innovation ensure that MST is part of the national leading group in the transformation to the healthcare of the future. Part of this transformation is the desire to embed data-driven work more firmly in the organization, including in monitoring and managing the quality and safety of healthcare.</p><p>To improve quality and safety, hospitals must meet national standards through quality indicators. One of these quality indicators is the timely delivery of clinical discharge letters within 24 hours. This indicator is based on the guidelines for information exchange between general practitioners and specialists (HASP), which is crucial for patient safety and information transfer. In 2022, MST had no insight into the quality of this indicator. Therefore, a team of medical experts indicated a need for real-time monitoring of this quality indicator down to the level of the individual nursing ward.</p><p>As a result, a new indicator was developed and introduced in MST&rsquo;s quality dashboard. This indicator shows the number of discharge letters in relation to the number of discharged patients per specialism, combined with the corresponding percentage (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>). Business- and medical managers, among others, have insight into the percentage of letters that were sent within 24 hours to manage the process according to the HASP guideline. In-depth information, like the percentage of patients whose discharge letter was sent after 24 hours or not at all, is currently available for a selected number of people, such as the advisors of the quality department.</p><p>Until insight in the indicator was retrieved via the dashboard, the assumption prevailed that the hospital performance on this indicator was according to the standard of 90%. However, when the first results of the indicator were presented, it turned out MST was performing worse. In 2022, 50% of discharge letters were sent within 24 hours. Where results of the indicator were initially viewed with scepticism by medical and business managers, examination of patient files showed that the percentages shown were correct almost everywhere. This gave confidence in the quality of the dashboard. In 2024, with the aim of improving results, the indicator was discussed every six weeks by the entire MST management team, leading to a performance improvement of up to 59% to date. However, this is not yet the desired result.</p><p>To improve even further, we implemented a number of additional interventions. First, since the dashboard is applied hospital-wide it provides insight into the performance per departments. To study differences in performance between the departments, a mixed-methods study was conducted in 2024. This study revealed performance differences between education and non-education departments and identified both barriers and facilitators, such as a lack of knowledge about HASP criteria, workload and the (lack of) use of templates. Second, based on their performance, some departments requested additional in-depth information to define an improvement plan. Among this information indicators such as the specialist involved, the discharge date and time and the type of discharge letter, for example inpatient/outpatient, were requested. This information has been conveniently retrieved from the dashboard and provided to the relevant departments.</p><p>Writing the discharge letter in accordance with the HASP guideline and sending it within 24 hours indicates that relevant topics such as admission diagnostics, current medication overview, hospital appointments and lifestyle advice have been communicated in a timely and proper manner to the subsequent healthcare provider. The dashboard could be expanded with additional indicators to even better monitor and support the performance of the hospital discharge letter and improvement processes in the various departments.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 176 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Discharge letter as an indicator on MST&rsquo;s quality dashboard</p></caption><link locator="176_F1"></fig></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bekker, I. M. d., Bruinderink, R. G., Oosterhof-Berktas, R., Moekotte, N. L., Bos, M., Diermen, N. v., Lindert, A. t.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.176</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.176</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[176 Development of a quality dashboard to examine the timeliness of clinical discharge letters in a top clinical hospital in the Netherlands]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A130</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A131</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A131?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[177 What do they do again? Students learning about the roles of other health professionals through interprofessional simulation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A131?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Effective interprofessional healthcare teams are known to benefit patient care.<sup>1</sup> There is an expectation that pre-licensure health discipline programs prepare students for interprofessional collaboration in practice. Health care students mostly learn within their own discipline, without the interactions required to improve attitudes and knowledge for practice in interprofessional teams. Interactions between disciplines are required for students to gain knowledge about the roles and responsibilities of other health professionals and to build respect and understanding for collaborative practice. Interprofessional simulation experiences can have a positive effect on healthcare students.<sup>2</sup> Healthcare graduates recall learning about teamwork, communication, and conflict resolution that was undertaken during simulation activities.<sup>2</sup> However, while students may be exposed to interprofessional collaborations during their pre-licensure studies, the extent to which they internalise roles of other health professionals is less understood.</p></sec><sec><st>Research Question</st><p>The aim of this research was to describe the interprofessional role understanding of undergraduate healthcare students participating in an interprofessional simulation experience. The research question was &lsquo;What do interprofessional students understand about the roles of the participants in the interprofessional team?&rsquo;</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A three-hour interprofessional immersive simulation experience was designed to simulate an acute ward situation, including eight patient scenarios for each ward. Patient scenarios were designed by an interprofessional team to require the input of different health professionals. Student participants were from nursing, occupational therapy, physiotherapy and speech pathology disciplines. A pre/post survey design was used to gain information on changes to students&rsquo; role understanding after participating in the simulations. An expert group of interprofessional clinicians identified 30 tasks commonly conducted in healthcare. Student participants were provided the list of tasks in on online survey format and asked to assign each task to the professions that would undertake those tasks.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 1213 students (Nursing n=905; and Allied Health (Occupational Therapy n=185; Physiotherapy n=20; Speech Pathology n=103)) participated in the pre-test and 935 (Nursing n=753; and Allied health (Occupational Therapy n=101; Physiotherapy n=17; Speech Pathology n=63)) students participated in the post-test. Role understanding was influenced by the simulation. Following the simulation there was an increase of 11.7% of nursing students who perceived their own role included &lsquo;upper limb therapy&rsquo; (32.8% pre and 44.5% post Chi<sup>2</sup>87.55 p &lt;0.00). There was an increase of 6.8% of allied health students who perceived nurses were involved in &lsquo;functional rehabilitation&rsquo; (pre-test 8.1% - post-test 14.9% Chi2 3.74 p=0.05). The most identified role for occupational therapists was &lsquo;home environment assessment&rsquo; (83.5% pre and 81.1% post). The most identified role for physiotherapists was &lsquo;exercise&rsquo; (85.5% pre and 83% post). The most identified roles for speech pathologists were &lsquo;swallow assessment&rsquo; (85.6% pre and 84.7% post) and &lsquo;safe swallowing&rsquo; (84.1% pre and 82.2% post). The role that was most marked as unknown was &lsquo;videofluroscopy&rsquo; (38.5% of pre and 32.3% post).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>This study highlighted the importance of students&rsquo; understandings about the roles of different professionals to enhance interprofessional collaborative practice and appropriate referral of patients. Students&rsquo; role understandings were influenced by the simulation scenarios. All students had a basic understanding of the main functions of each discipline before the simulation. Nursing students and allied health students both developed their understandings that nurses&rsquo; roles include rehabilitation practices such as functional rehabilitation and upper limb therapy through the simulations. It is accepted that rehabilitation is not solely the domain of allied health professionals and that nurses can and should play a role in this to optimise patient quality of care.<sup>3</sup> Targeted information sharing and understanding of therapy goals between disciplines may improve outcomes for patients, such as those undergoing stroke rehabilitation.<sup>4</sup> Facilitating students to understand their roles and recognise opportunities to collaborate with interprofessional team members in practice, may contribute to improved care quality and better patient outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Marion-Martins AD, and Pinho DLM. Interprofessional simulation effects for healthcare students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. <I>Nurse Education Today</I> 2020;<b>94</b>:104568. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104568</p></li><li><p>Davies H, Robertson S, Sundin D, and Jacob E. A follow-up study on the clinical impact of pre-registration extended immersive ward-based simulation. <I>Clinical Simulation in Nursing</I> 2024;<b>91:</b>101540. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101540</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Tanlaka EF, McIntyre A, Connelly D, Guitar N, Nguyen A, and Snobelen N. The role and contributions of nurses in stroke rehabilitation units: an integrative review. <I>Western Journal of Nursing Research</I> 2023;<b>45</b>(8):764&ndash;776. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459231178495</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Clarke DJ, Burton LJ, Tyson SF, Rodgers H, Drummond A, Palmer R, Hoffman A, Prescott M, Tyrrell P, Brkic L, Grenfell K, and Forster A. Why do stroke survivors not receive recommended amounts of active therapy? Findings from the ReAcT study, a mixed-methods case-study evaluation in eight stroke units. <I>Clin Rehabil.</I> 2018;<b>32</b>(8):1119&ndash;1132. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215518765329</inter-ref>  </p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob, E., Dickie, R., Darzins, S., Davies, H., Flynn, N., Smith-Tamaray, M., Maver, S., Barlow, M., Jacob, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.177</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.177</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[177 What do they do again? Students learning about the roles of other health professionals through interprofessional simulation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A131</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A131</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A134?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[182 Post COVID 19 pandemic turnaround strategy for a code blue rapid response system in a rural hospital in Mexico]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A134?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Failure-to-rescue (FTR) is a &lsquo;failure or delay in recognizing and responding to a hospitalized patient experiencing complications from a disease process or medical intervention&rsquo;.<sup>1</sup> It pinpoints patients safety and healthcare quality owed to hospital characteristics. Out-of-hospital cardiac-arrest incidence and FTR have increased since the SARSCov-2 pandemic.<sup>2</sup> This is due to SARSCov-2 and its sequelae, but also because &lsquo;SARSCov-2 collateral damage&rsquo;, meaning, interruption ordinary healthcare flow.<sup>3</sup> Additionally, health spending keeps falling across OCDE members up today.<sup>4</sup>Hospital General de Linares (HGL), is a n=30 beds second-level rural hospital covering n=75,043 non-insured inhabitants. Following the SARSCov-2 pandemic, HGL faced a code blue FTR rate of 91.5%, and a 42% inpatient mortality excess comparing January to June of 2022 to the same period of 2023. Organizations bound to scarce resources and intense stakeholder pressures may benefit from turnaround strategies.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Six staff leaders started HGLs code blue subcommittee. Two root causes underlie our studied problems: a) Failure for timely code blue activation, b) Lack of pre-briefed resuscitation teams. Both related to FTRs correlates over an 11-month retrospective analysis: a) n=11 non-ER cardiac-arrests, b) 74% DNRO candidates&rsquo; late agreement, c) n=40 unintended transitions to higher levels of care, d) 91.5% of code blue mortality. Three objectives were set: 1) Timely activation of code blue, 2) Pre-briefing code blue teams, 3) achieve resuscitation standards. A SWOT analysis, Vester Matrix and a Force Field analysis identified, ranked and matched HGL code blue weaknesses with four facilitators. Two safety strategies recommended by Vincent and Amalberti 2016,<sup>5</sup> were embedded in such facilitators (<cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>).</p><p>Project tasks were programmed as follows: Innovation (May to June 2023), Pilot testing (n=3 PDSA testing cycles) from July 2023 to March 2024; Implementation and diffusion from April 2024 to November 2024. Trained staff members were expected to lead change. T-TAQ questionnaires and outcomes were discussed in governance meetings. All code blue activations from August 2022 to March 2024 were reviewed and analyzed with p-charts.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Changes influenced HGLs code blue afferent limb: n=109 HGL clinical staff across 4 shifts; efferent limb: ad hoc code blue response-teams per event (n=9 to 16 members); and its quality and administrative organization.</p><p>We found positive patterns of non-random variation for code blue incidence outside the ER, transfer to higher levels of care, late disclosure of DNRO, and code blue related mortality (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>). We faced administrative and quality limbs problems: a) 2.5 to 10 months&rsquo; delay for organizational interventions approval and implementation, b) departments working in silos disagreed in code blue politics and in training calendars, c) human resources arranged shifts with &le;15% trained members. Afferent and efferent limbs expressed low belief for future improvements, and for mutual assistance. Scarce resources required ancillary team respondents per event (maintenance, other medical specialties, pharmacy/devices storage personnel, administrative staff).</p><p>To conclude, quality initiatives amid underfunding, segmentation of regulations and a strong demand of care after SARSCov-2 pandemic may benefit from turnaround strategies, alongside interventions addressing low belief about mutual assistance, and interest in change. We expect &ge;3 pilot PDSA cycles for this project.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Winters B, Rosen M, Sharma R, Zhang A, Bass E. Making healthcare safer IV: a continuous updating of patient safety harms and practices. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). 2023. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38011296/</p></li><li><p>Kovach CP, Perman SM. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac arrest systems of care. <I>Curr Opin Crit Care</I> 2021;<b>27</b>(3):239&ndash;45.</p></li><li><p>Oke J, Heneghan C. COVID-19 &ndash; Collateral Damage in Scotland [Internet]. OCEBM. 2020. Available from: https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/covid-collateral-damage-in-scotland/</p></li><li><p>Health L, Trends S, Beyond N, Recent THE. Latest health spending trends: Navigating beyond the recent crises. 2024 Dec;1&ndash;8.</p></li><li><p>Vincent C, Amalberti R. Chapter 6, Strategies for Safety. Safer Healthcare: Strategies for the Real World. 2016. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK481874/doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-25559-0_6</p></li></l></p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 182 Table 1</no><caption><p>Vincent and Amalberti 2016 patient safety strategies used in this project</p></caption><tblbdy><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1">  <b>Strategy #I</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="4">Focal safety program: reduction of harm </c><c cspan="1" rspan="4">a) Training in a new in-place bundle (Triangle resuscitation model for resource limited team structure) of 50% of HGL staff over 4 weeks, one station with members from 4 shifts at a single time (n=15 to n=22 attendants) alongside a high performing teamwork integrative framework (4 hours of TeamSTEPPS-based course). </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Improved reliability of targeted processes </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">a) Periodic reminder of code blue triggers </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1">  <b>Strategy #IV</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Improve safety culture </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">a) Scheduling forums for asking feedback </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="3">Monitoring, adaptation and response in clinical teams </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">a) Training relevant for code blue response </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">b) Creation of relevant databases </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">c) Periodic analysis of databases </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="2">Improve management of organisational pressures and priorities </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">a) Structuring rapid response teams </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">b) Adapt rapid response system afferent-, efferent-, organizational- and quality limbs </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="2">Regulatory compromises and adaptation </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">a) Systematic interrogation of Do Not Resuscitate Orders (DNRO) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">b) Staff commitment to pre-defined code blue triggers </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 182 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Positive patterns of non-random variation for: A) Code blue incidence outside the ER; B) Transfer to higher levels of care, C) Late disclosure of DNRO, and D) Code blue related mortality</p></caption><link locator="182_F1"></fig></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinez-Macias, R., Botello-Castillo, B., Reyes-Delgado, R., Reyes-Torres, S., Rodriguez-Vazquez, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.182</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.182</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[182 Post COVID 19 pandemic turnaround strategy for a code blue rapid response system in a rural hospital in Mexico]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A134</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A135</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A135?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[183 Introduction of free contraceptive services for vulnerable postnatal patients using a lean six sigma approach]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A135?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Wexford General Hospital has approximately deliveries 1,650 per year.<sup>1</sup> This project was part of the National Women and Infants Health Programme&rsquo;s (NWIHP) project funding contraception for vulnerable women.<sup>2</sup> This project aimed to introduce a pathway for vulnerable postnatal patients in Wexford to access free long acting reversible contraceptives.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A lean six sigma DMADV (define, measure, analyse, design, validate) structure was used. Voice of the customer analysis of staff was undertaken. Multidisciplinary education sessions for staff were held. Numbers of patients accessing medical social work services in the unit were examined, to assess the number potentially eligible to access this programme. Vulnerable patients were identified during routine multidisciplinary psychosocial meetings. These patients were then made aware of this during their visits and offered to avail of this postnatally. The new pathway was drafted by the project team members and signed off by key stakeholders. Staff had the opportunity to feedback prior to approval of the new pathway. The new pathway was written into the local hospital guidelines. Long-term members of staff will ensure the longevity of this project. The records of patients accessing this programme will be recorded and used to give feedback to NWIHP to ensure continued funding of this service.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>From January to July 2024 this pathway was offered to patients who met the criteria and was used by 5 patients. Staff in the maternity department were keen to engage with this project as it was providing a service that they had wished to offer the patients. This can be expanded to include other forms of contraception and to gynaecology services in the future. This sets an example for other similar units to make this service available to patients who may not otherwise have a choice to access contraception.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>National Women and Infants Healthcare Programme (2022 Nov). Contraceptive Funding Proposal for Maternity &amp; Gynaecology Services.</p></li><li><p>National Women and Infants Healthcare Programme (2021). Annual Report. Available: https://yourexperience.ie/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/National-Maternity-Experience-Survey-results.pdf</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mohan, S., Keating, L., OConnell, R., Dunn, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.183</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.183</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[183 Introduction of free contraceptive services for vulnerable postnatal patients using a lean six sigma approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A135</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A135</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A138?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[188 Rethinking pressure injury surveillance in the ICU: external validation and proposed implementation of a natural language processing algorithm]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A138?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Pressure injuries (PI) are a potentially preventable hospital acquired complication which disproportionately affects patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).<sup>1</sup> Surveillance systems which track the prevalence and incidence of PIs in the ICU patient population are essential for identification and early detection, and for management and evaluation of quality improvement initiatives related to pressure injuries. Current surveillance systems are known to have multiple limitations including missing and erroneous data, time delays and not being specific to the ICU patient population.</p><p>Multiple previous studies have been conducted to quantify the inaccuracies in existing surveillance systems, specifically, those which rely on clinical codes and those which require clinicians to enter reports in an incident management system.<sup>2 3</sup> Reported reasons for clinical coding inaccuracies include the need to represent the whole hospitalisation, not specifically the ICU admission, and a requirement to comply with coding guidelines. Discussion with clinicians revealed frustration with the need to report PIs in multiple locations and nursing staff commented that PIs were routinely documented in their progress notes.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>The project was conducted in the adult ICU of five public hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. Participating sites included rural, metropolitan and tertiary referral centres and included all patients who had their episode of care recorded in the clinical information system from 1st June 2017 to 30th June 2023. The project team consisted of ICU clinicians, data managers and analysts. Ethics approval, including a waiver of consent, was obtained from the Northern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (2024/ETH00114).</p><p>The project involved externally validating a previously developed natural language processing algorithm to detect when a PI had been documented in the electronic ICU clinical information system. The algorithm classified notes by counting the number of time true positive (such as &lsquo;pressure injury&rsquo;) and false positive (such as &lsquo;no pressure injury&rsquo;) words/phrases occurred in a progress note. A rule that if the true positive count is greater than the false positive count then classify as positive was then applied to enable the detection of documented PIs. The algorithm had previously been developed using data from one site and was externally validated using data from four additional sites. Performance was also compared to that of an algorithm based on clinical codes.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Performance of the natural language processing algorithm was assessed using over 120 million free-text fields from 40,033 patients. On external validation the algorithm achieved F1 scores (an overall measure of accuracy where scores closer to 1 indicate better performance) ranging from 0.749 to 0.743 whereas the clinical codes achieved F1 scores of 0.611 to 0.322 on the same datasets. Once implemented, we anticipate that the system will result in wound management reviews occurring faster and reduce the time staff spend reporting PIs.</p><p>The project team is currently working on piloting the algorithm at one site through a secure, cloud-based platform which hosts a replica of the ICU clinical information system. The algorithm will provide a daily summary of documented PIs in the ICU and identify which patients require a wound review and management plan. Clinicians are involved in determining how the algorithm&rsquo;s output will be integrated into existing wound review processes and will have opportunities to provide feedback regarding the end-user interface during the pilot.</p><p>The algorithm demonstrated satisfactory performance on external validation and performance superior to that of clinical codes. Infrastructure necessary to implement the algorithm has been scoped and will be trialled in the future. This will reduce documentation burden for staff and better support PI related quality improvement and research programs through more accurate data.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Coyer F, Miles S, Gosley S, <I>et al</I>. Pressure injury prevalence in intensive care versus non-intensive care patients: a state-wide comparison. <I>Australian Critical Care</I> 2017;<b>30</b>(5):244&ndash;50. DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2016.12.003</p></li><li><p>Barakat-Johnson M, Lai M, Barnett C, <I>et al</I>. Hospital-acquired pressure injuries: are they accurately reported? A prospective descriptive study in a large tertiary hospital in Australia. <I>Journal of Tissue Viability</I> 2018;<b>27</b>(4):203&ndash;10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2018.07.003</p></li><li><p>Team V, Tuck M, Reeves J, <I>et al</I>. Pressure injury data in Australian acute care settings: a comparison of three data sets. <I>International Wound Journal</I> 2020;<b>17</b>(3):578&ndash;86.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pilowsky, J. K., Choi, J.-W., Nguyen, N., Williams, L., Jones, S. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.188</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.188</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[188 Rethinking pressure injury surveillance in the ICU: external validation and proposed implementation of a natural language processing algorithm]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A138</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A139</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A139?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[189 Improving patient flow to reduce emergency department crowding: a Tunisian tertiary level hospital experience]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A139?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Emergency department ED patient satisfaction is an important metric that is frequently used to assess the quality of care and health system performance.<sup>1</sup> Care elements that affect ED patient satisfaction are information sharing, staff empathy and attitudes and promptness of care.<sup>2&ndash;4</sup> In this perspective, measuring than improving these factors would contribute to increase ED patient satisfaction. This framework explains our study&rsquo;s goal conducted in the ED of the of University Charles Nicolle Hospital, the most attractive in Tunisia in term of ED visits and hospitalizations.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We conducted a cross-sectional study during April 2024 on a random sample of patients (n=97). A questionnaire was administered assessing their satisfaction regarding information sharing, health care providers attitudes, access to care and health care environment.<sup>5</sup> Additional data were gathered from a focus group discussion session that included ED staff representatives (medical and paramedical) and conducted in July 2024. Root causes were investigated according to the flow components: Input, throughput and output factors.<sup>6</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Items causing most dissatisfaction among patients were medication availability, environment cleanliness and sanitation, access to explanations as regards complementary investigations and treatments and also the time and attention accorded from the health professional. Focus group discussions highlighted overcrowding as the main obstacle to delivering a high quality and person-centered care. Boarding and exit were identified as priority for action, as well as optimizing the use of electronic health records to support timeliness and effectiveness of operational management. Analysis was disseminated to top management, and actions were established according to the action plan bellow (see <cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>):</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 189 Table 1</no><caption><p>Action plan to improve quality of care in emergency department</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Timeline</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Actions planned</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Immediate interventions </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">- Strengthen the triage process (strengthening human resources, include vital measurements)<br>- Support the on-call team<br>- Establish interservice meetings to improve the patients&rsquo; flow from ED to hospitalization ward </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Medium term interventions </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">- Create a dashboard connected with electronic health records to allow immediate remote of ED staff to key performance indicators </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Longterm interventions </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">- Undertake premise renovation and reconfiguration </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p>During this project, patients and carers were involved in defining the quality of care gaps and their root causes. Carers and top management staff were engaged in the design and of interventions and implementation phase. The short-term improvement will be assessed using a before-and-after study to assess the impact on their satisfactions, in addition to monitoring turnover rate and the average length of hospitalization in ED.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Mostafa R, El-Atawi K. Strategies to measure and improve emergency department performance: a review. <I>Cureus</I> 2024 Jan 24;<b>16</b>(1):e52879. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52879. PMID: 38406097; PMCID: PMC10890971</p></li><li><p>Ferreira DC, Vieira I, Pedro MI, Caldas P, Varela M. Patient satisfaction with healthcare services and the techniques used for its assessment: a systematic literature review and a bibliometric analysis. <I>Healthcare (Basel)</I> 2023 Feb 21;<b>11</b>(5):639. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11050639. PMID: 36900644; PMCID: PMC10001171</p></li><li><p>Rowe A, Knox M. The impact of the healthcare environment on patient experience in the emergency department: a systematic review to understand the implications for patient-centered design. <I>HERD</I>. 2023 Apr;<b>16</b>(2):310&ndash;329. doi: 10.1177/19375867221137097. Epub 2022 Dec 21. PMID: 36541114; PMCID: PMC10133779</p></li><li><p>Janerka C, Leslie GD, Gill FJ. Patient experience of emergency department triage: an integrative review.<I> Int Emerg Nurs</I>. 2024 Jun;<b>74</b>:101456. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101456. Epub 2024 May 14. PMID: 38749231</p></li><li><p>Chebil D, Belhadj M, Aidi M, Hannachi H, Barhoumi T, Merzougui L. Patients&rsquo; perception of the quality of care at the Ibn Al Jazzar University Hospital in Kairouan, Tunisia. <I>Tunis Med</I>. 2022 Aug-Sep;<b>100</b>(8&ndash;9):618&ndash;625. English. PMID: 36571730; PMCID: PMC9744126</p></li><li><p>Grant KL, Bayley CJ, Premji Z, Lang E, Innes G. Throughput interventions to reduce emergency department crowding: a systematic review. <I>CJEM</I> 2020;<b>22</b>(6):864&ndash;874. doi:10.1017/cem.2020.426</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mansour, N. B., Jouini, S., Nefati, A., Hedhli, H., Othmani, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.189</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.189</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[189 Improving patient flow to reduce emergency department crowding: a Tunisian tertiary level hospital experience]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A139</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A140</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A141?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[192 No #me too please! How to address transgressive behaviour and how to change your workplace towards a culture of accountability]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A141?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>This case study examines the implementation and impact of a multidisciplinary initiative to address transgressive behaviour within the surgical department of Albert Schweitzer Hospital, The Netherlands. In response to increasing awareness of social safety issues and the detrimental effects of workplace misconduct, this initiative sought to foster a culture of psychological safety and accountability.<sup>1 2</sup> The intervention incorporated ethical leadership principles, structured policy development, and practical tools to enhance workplace safety and collaboration.<sup>3&ndash;5</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Research Question</st><p>How can a structured intervention incorporating ethical leadership, policy implementation, and accountability measures reduce transgressive behaviour and improve workplace culture in a hospital setting?</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A multi-faceted approach was employed, combining:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>An anonymous survey among nursing and operating theatre staff to assess the prevalence and impact of transgressive behaviour.</p></li><li><p>Development and implementation of a formal code of conduct.</p></li><li><p>Deployment of the #zouikwatzeggen app, enabling anonymous reporting and providing resources for addressing misconduct.</p></li><li><p>A series of multidisciplinary workshops and training sessions.</p></li><li><p>Dialogue tables to facilitate open discussions among healthcare professionals.</p></li><li><p>Tailored interventions for teams experiencing acute challenges. The initiative was guided by key theoretical frameworks, including the Parker and Hudson Safety Culture Ladder, the Toxic Triangle model by van der Loo and Koetsenruijter, and the ABCD model from the Dutch Safe Public Task Programme.<sup>1&ndash;6</sup>  </p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The initiative led to a cultural shift towards greater openness, inclusivity, and safety. Improvements were evident within the surgical department, where increased awareness and formalised structures contributed to a more respectful working environment. Organisationally, the initiative prompted hospital-wide engagement, with leadership bodies&mdash;including the Board of Directors, the Medical Specialists Board, and the Works Council&mdash;committing to enhanced policies and actions to combat transgressive behaviour. Nationally, the approach has gained traction, with multiple surgical departments adopting similar frameworks and preparations underway for a nationwide training programme by the Dutch Board of Surgeons. The initiative is further supported through national symposia, podcasts, and dialogue sessions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>This structured, multi-faceted approach demonstrated a significant positive impact on workplace culture at the surgical department of the Albert Schweitzer hospital, Dordrecth, the Netherlands, improving psychological safety and reducing instances of transgressive behaviour. By integrating ethical leadership, clear policies, and interactive dialogue, the initiative might offer a replicable model for other healthcare institutions. Our findings underscore the importance of a proactive and multi-faceted approach in fostering a safe and respectful work environment, ultimately benefiting both healthcare professionals and patient care outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Jagsi R. Sexual Harassment in Medicine &mdash; #metoo. <I>N Engl J Med</I>. 2018;<b>378</b>(3):209&ndash;11.</p></li><li><p>Gianakos AL, <I>et al</I>. Bullying, discrimination, harassment, sexual harassment, and the fear of retaliation during surgical residency training: a systematic review. <I>World J Surg</I>. 2022;<b>46</b>(7):1587&ndash;99.</p></li><li><p>RCS England. Managing disruptive behaviours [Internet]. 2021 Apr. Available from: https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/standards-and-research/standards-and-guidance/good-practice-guides/managing-disruptive-behaviours/</p></li><li><p>Edmondson AC. Learning from failure in health care: frequent opportunities, pervasive barriers. <I>Qual Saf Health Care</I> 2004;<b>13</b>(suppl 2):ii3.</p></li><li><p>Amoadu M, <I>et al</I>. Preventing workplace mistreatment and improving workers&rsquo; mental health: a scoping review of the impact of psychosocial safety climate. <I>BMC Psychol</I>. 2024;<b>12</b>(1):195.</p></li><li><p>Van der Loo H, Koetsenruijter C. Giftig gedoe op de werkplek. ISBN 9789024449842. 2023; April.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lijkwan, M., Kloosterman, F., Bosma, G., van der Wal, R., Koetsenruijter, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.192</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.192</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[192 No #me too please! How to address transgressive behaviour and how to change your workplace towards a culture of accountability]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A141</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A142</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A143?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[195 Using quality improvement methodology to increase throughput and reduce cost by decreasing bronchiolitis length of stay]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A143?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Bronchiolitis is a viral respiratory illness that is the most common reason for inpatient admission at our pediatric hospital in Plano, Texas. Despite its ubiquity, there is significant variation in management. Even small improvements in length of stay can have a significant impact on cost and throughput.</p><p>Our group was a multidisciplinary team of physicians, respiratory therapists, and nurses, who worked to create a culture change and reduce variation in care.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We identified that the bronchiolitis patient population had the highest variation in the cost of care and length of stay, and we surveyed clinicians and audited patient charts to identify variations in clinical practice. We theorized that by minimizing variation in practice, we could drive down length of stay and cost of care.</p><p>Our SMART aim was to reduce the average length of stay of patients with uncomplicated bronchiolitis at our hospital by 12 hours (from 54 to 42 hours) between January 2023 and the end of 2024, without increasing our 72-hour same cause readmission rate.</p><p>Our team developed process maps, audited charts, and reviewed the literature to identify the most significant areas of clinical &lsquo;waste.&rsquo; We developed pareto charts to prioritize the biggest contributors: high flow weaning practices, use of physiologic monitors, and physician discharge goals. This information was shared across multiple presentations to all groups across the campus in order to present the extent of the problem.</p><p>We implemented dozens of interventions in rapid succession to address the key areas. We implemented protocols for weaning high flow and removing monitors. We utilized changes in the electronic medical record through note templates and order sets, physical fliers, and educational modules. We also put heavy emphasis on training new hires with best practices.</p><p>We began by sharing data with all groups to evaluate initial practice gaps and variation. We presented literature to suggest changes, and then began to slowly see clinicians adopt these protocols. Over the course of 2 years we shifted the majority practice to optimize bronchiolitis management.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Between January 2023 and December 2024, we decreased our average length of stay by 18.9 hours (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>). Through our electronic medical record, chart audits of the &lsquo;room air trial&rsquo; portion of our weaning protocol showed an improvement from 40% to 67% compliance by Fall 2023 which was maintained through 2024. The percentage of physicians ordering spot checks increased throughout our intervention period from 45% to 91%, and the percent of patients taken off monitors within 6 hours of reaching room air went up from 58% to 71%. Physician orders to allow a lower 88% oxygen goal increased substantially, going from 19% of orders initially to 61% by Fall 2024 (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>). As a balancing measure, we observed a decrease in the 72-hour same cause readmission rate from 0.72% to 0.19% (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F3">figure 3</cross-ref>).</p><p>Between January 2023 and December 2024, our length of stay improvements amounted to a total savings of 1137 patient days, equating to a potential capacity for an additional 444 patients and an estimated cost savings of $3.01 million. Our multidisciplinary team was able to achieve large scale buy-in and sustain these efforts over 2 years through a grassroots effort with executive level support.</p><p>Multidisciplinary collaboration was essential to success, because prior attempts just working with physicians did not lead to sustained efforts. By involving the entire campus on this project and initiating new hires, we were able to enact massive culture change across the hospital while also sustaining improvements. Future PDSA cycles will involve employing faster weaning protocols, additional clinical decision support through the EMR, and further integrating these changes into our processes to maintain these improvements.</p><p>Although change can sometimes be very slow and difficult, ultimately molding culture change can result in significant improvements in patient care. Focusing efforts on the most impactful projects and getting widespread multidisciplinary buy-in allowed us to substantially improve throughput and reduce cost of care, and other institutions could utilize similar methodologies to see similar improvements.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 195 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Plano bronchiolitis length of stay - August 2021 to Decemer 2024. We implemented PDSA cycles in rapid succession. These interventions resulted in two centerline shifts, ultimately showing a reduction in average length of stay by 18.9 hours compared to the baseline period</p></caption><link locator="195_F1"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 195 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Same cause readmissions within 72 hours for patients with uncomplicated* bronchiolitis. We observed a decrease in our rate of same-cause readmissions within 72 hours for patients with uncomplicated bronchiolitis from 0.72% in our baseline period to 0.19% in our intervention period</p></caption><link locator="195_F2"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F3"><no>Abstract 195 Figure 3</no><caption><p>Audits of physician ordering practices and process measures for patients with bronchiolitis. Chart audits were done in intervals to measure our process improvements. We observed a positive change in physician orders and in bedside practices over the course of the intervention period</p></caption><link locator="195_F3"></fig></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sachin, S., Gerald, M., Amethyst, B., Alyssa, G., Sharmila, C. K., Latana, J., Chasity, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.195</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.195</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[195 Using quality improvement methodology to increase throughput and reduce cost by decreasing bronchiolitis length of stay]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A143</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A146</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A147?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[198 Safe post-surgical ventilated patient transfer to SICU using checklists]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A147?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Transfer of postoperative ventilated patients from the operating room (OR) to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) is a critical stage involving advanced monitoring, pharmacological, and ventilatory support. This transfer process can often be associated with medical errors arising from human and system factors. Evidence from existing literature indicates that adverse events during patient transfers, including disruptions in monitoring and interruptions of pharmacological therapies, can substantially affect clinical outcomes (Nagpal <I>et al</I>., 2010). Specifically, inadequacies in continuous physiological monitoring, oxygenation, ventilation, and uninterrupted infusion of vasoactive medications are commonly cited issues that contribute to patient harm during transfers (Hales <I>et al</I>., 2008; Brunsveld-Reinders <I>et al</I>., 2015; Karamchandani <I>et al</I>., 2018)).</p><p>At Hamad General Hospital (HGH), we aimed to improve the safety during transfers of post-surgical ventilated patients. A retrospective analysis of the hospital&rsquo;s Occurrence Variance Accidents (OVA) for 2022 identified key requirements for safe transfer; routine use of portable continuous monitors to monitor patient&rsquo;s ECG, blood pressure, oxygenation, and ventilation; appropriate administration of oxygen from oxygen cylinder by portable controlled ventilator; and pharmacological infusion of vasopressors, inotropes, and sedatives as needed using battery operated pumps.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A transfer checklist incorporating key standards for safe patient transfer between OR and SICU was developed and approved by the Quality and Patient Safety (QPS) committee of the Anesthesia Department (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>). Training sessions were conducted to educate staff on the standards mentioned in the checklist, its proper use, and potential clinically adverse consequences that may occur during patient transfer. A detailed process map was created and refined through PDSA cycles 1 and 2 (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>). Additionally, a structured handover checklist was designed to ensure clarity and completeness of clinical information during transfer (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F5">figure 5</cross-ref>).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Baseline compliance with the ventilated patient transfer process from the OR to SICU at HGH was 67%. Following the implementation of the standardized checklist and structured staff training on new protocols, compliance improved significantly, reaching 90% by August 2023 and 100% by December 2023. The implementation of a comprehensive transfer checklist combined with ongoing education and monitoring, led to a significant improvement in compliance with the safety standards during patient transfers.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Implementation of a standardized transfer checklist, staff training, and continuous monitoring improved adherence to safety protocols during transfers of post-surgical ventilated patients from the OR to the SICU. This quality improvement initiative underscores the importance of standardized processes and structured education/training in enhancing patient safety and reducing transfer-related medical errors.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 198 Figure 1</no><caption><p>PDSA cycles 1 PDSA cycles 2</p></caption><link locator="198_F1"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 198 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Checklist for transfer of postoperative ventilated patients</p></caption><link locator="198_F2"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F3"><no>Abstract 198 Figure 3</no><caption><p>Chart showing the number of cases audited in the patient transfer process from OR to SICU</p></caption><link locator="198_F3"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F4"><no>Abstract 198 Figure 4</no><caption><p>Chart showing the data of compliance of ventilated patients transferred from OR to SICU in PDSA 1 &amp; 2</p></caption><link locator="198_F4"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F5"><no>Abstract 198 Figure 5</no><caption><p>The standardized handover checklist utilized to endorse patients after transfer</p></caption><link locator="198_F5"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Nagpal K, Arora S, Abboudi M, Vats A, Wong HW, Manchanda C, Vincent C, Moorthy K. Postoperative handover: problems, pitfalls, and prevention of error. <I>Annals of Surgery</I> 2010 Jul 1;<b>252</b>(1):171&ndash;6.</p></li><li><p>Hales B, Terblanche M, Fowler R, Sibbald W. Development of medical checklists for improved quality of patient care. <I>International Journal for Quality in Health Care</I> 2008 Feb 1;<b>20</b>(1):22&ndash;30.</p></li><li><p>Brunsveld-Reinders AH, Arbous MS, Kuiper SG, de Jonge E. A comprehensive method to develop a checklist to increase safety of intra-hospital transport of critically ill patients. <I>Critical Care</I> 2015 Dec;<b>19</b>:1&ndash;0.</p></li><li><p>Karamchandani K, Fitzgerald K, Carroll D, Trauger ME, Ciccocioppo LA, Hess W, Prozesky J, Armen SB. A multidisciplinary handoff process to standardize the transfer of care between the intensive care unit and the operating room.<I> Quality Management in Healthcare</I> 2018 Oct 1;<b>27</b>(4):215&ndash;22.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Muhammed, A. K., Najeh, T., Mnasri, R., Cherif, M., Feki, A., Sunny, D., Tom, T., Karmakar, A., Jaffar Khan, M., Al-Hammad, M. F., Selim, H., Khatib, M. S. E., Almasri, M., Atalla, A., Khelaifi, M. A., Hammad, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.198</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.198</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[198 Safe post-surgical ventilated patient transfer to SICU using checklists]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A147</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A150</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A153?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[203 SHSCT early intervention domestic abuse service]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A153?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The Gateway Service is a social work service undertaking initial assessments with families referred to the Southern Health &amp; Social Care Trust who are not currently known to social services. Gateway work in partnership with children and families to assess and identify services to meet the needs of those referred. They work with other agencies where concerns arise about a child/young person and develop plans for children requiring further social work intervention.</p><p>Due to increasing demands on the Service and reduced social work capacity Gateway struggled to provide early intervention in a timely and effective way. A significant number of children are referred as a result of domestic abuse, 3898 children referred from April 2021 to March 2022. Ongoing social work staffing deficits, intervention could not be provided to a significant number of those children. </p><p>We undertook an in-depth review of the referrals to the Gateway Service, along with the current waiting list and those cases closed without initial assessment was undertaken. It was recognised that initial assessment indicated the need for early intervention however this had not need had been met in all cases. A proportion of these families had been re-referred back to the Gateway Service following an escalation of the concerns within the home.</p><p>The project engaged with senior management, all levels of staff within Gateway including senior social workers who undertake the thresholding of referrals coming into the service and social care staff who engage with families at an early intervention level. </p><p>It was agreed that skilled non-social work staff could deliver early intervention to support families to make positive changes with support from a senior social work practitioner. In response funding was secured, job descriptions were developed to recruit senior social work practitioner and 2 band 5 support workers to provide specialist early intervention.</p><p>A bespoke tailored intervention plan was developed aimed at creating safety plans for victims and their children to prevent further risk of harm and increase awareness of the impact of domestic abuse on children. The risk is assessed using the Domestic Abuse, Stalking, Harassment and Honour Based Violence Assessment Tool and onward referrals made if appropriate.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>We used a Quality Improvement approach, to agree SMART aim and plan our measurement undertaking PDSA cycles.</p><p>We measured the number of referrals and safe care plans implemented, the number of referrals awaiting allocation more than 20 working days, and sought feedback from both parents and children. </p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>To date the Early Intervention Domestic Abuse Service have provided intervention to 1132 children and their families.</p><p>Service users referred to the service following an incident of domestic abuse now receive more timely response. Safe plans are discussed with every victim and child and tailored intervention to increase safety, awareness of the impact of domestic abuse and explore safe networks. This has increased safety and reduced risk of harm to children. A DASH form is completed to help identify the risk and onward referrals made as appropriate. </p><p>The project has reduced pressure in locality gateway teams and increased capacity to respond to other family support referrals. Early intervention has led to a reduction in the number of families being referred to longer term social work teams for intervention. There are currently no families waiting more than 20 working days for an initial assessment following an incident of domestic abuse.</p><p>One service user has provided feedback outlining that our service was there &lsquo;<I>when I needed it&rsquo;,</I> indicating the importance and value of early intervention to the families that we work alongside.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quinn, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.203</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.203</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[203 SHSCT early intervention domestic abuse service]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A153</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A154</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A155?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[206 DR HOPE: reducing drug-related harm to outreach proactively from emergency care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A155?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Drug use is estimated to cause over half a million deaths globally each year, with almost 80% involving an opioid.<sup>1</sup> Scotland&rsquo;s drug death rate of 327 per million population annually is the highest recorded in Europe (National Records of Scotland.<sup>2</sup> Despite incremental improvements over the last few years across Scotland the number of Drug-Related Deaths in the Highlands continues to rise.<sup>2</sup> Proactive outreach of those most at risk of drug-related harm is thought to offer a protective effect. However, current processes were not timely enough for urgent outreach. A Trigger Checklist was developed which includes two screening questions and a further ten background questions. A &lsquo;yes&rsquo; response to either of the screening questions initiatives assertive outreach.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim</st><p>To test and implement the use of the Trigger Checklist and assertive outreach within 48 hours for those at high risk of drug-related harm within the local rural Emergency Department. </p><p>To identify mechanisms which explain how and why the Trigger Tool is completed some of the time in the ED and under what circumstances.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The project will be tested and implemented using the Model for Improvement.<sup>3</sup> Small scale Plan, Do, Study, Act cycles were used to test and adapt the Trigger Checklist and referral pathway within a rural Emergency Department. Realist methodology will be used to determine causation of the mechanisms causing various behaviours.<sup>4</sup>Context, Mechanism and Outcome (CMO) configurations were devised and continually refined using literature and interviews with key stakeholders in the ED. </p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Data collection remains ongoing, but to date 27 Trigger Checklist have been received from the ED. Of those, all were attempted to be outreached by recovery workers within 48 hours of the trigger. Of the 27, 19 (79%) were supported within 48 hours, 2 were outreached within 7 days, 2 were inappropriate referrals, 1 was referred to another recovery service and 3 were not outreached. CMO configurations have reduced from 36 to 22 and stakeholder interviews continue.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>World Health Organisation (WHO). World Health Organisation: Patient Safety [online]. 2023. Available: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/opioid-overdose</inter-ref> [Accessed 24 March 2025].</p></li><li><p>National Records of Scotland. Drug-related deaths in Scotland in 2022 [online]. 2023. Available: https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/statistics-and-data/statistics/statistics-by-theme/vital-events/deaths/drug-related-deaths-in-scotland/2022 [Accessed 5 Aug 2024]</p></li><li><p>Langley GJ, Moen RD, Nolan KM, Nolan TW, Norman CL, Provost LP. <I>The improvement guide: a practical approach to enhancing organizational performance</I>. John Wiley &amp; Sons, 2009.</p></li><li><p>Pawson R, Tilley N. <I>Realistic Evaluation</I>. London: Sage Publication, 1997. </p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beattie, M., Campbell, L., Terje, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.206</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.206</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[206 DR HOPE: reducing drug-related harm to outreach proactively from emergency care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A155</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A156</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A158?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[211 Sustaining changes in clinician behavior using audit and feedback]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A158?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Validated clinical decision rules such as the NEXUS Cervical Spine (C-spine) Rule can be used to risk stratify patients who present to the emergency department (ED) for neck trauma, identifying patients who are low-risk for a clinically significant injury and obviating the need for computed tomography (CT) imaging.<sup>1</sup> Despite the availability of such tools, imaging overutilization remains a pervasive issue.<sup>2</sup> Overutilization of CT imaging exposes patients to unnecessary radiation, impairs hospital throughput, and increases healthcare costs.<sup>2&ndash;4</sup> In a prior randomized controlled trial of audit-and-feedback strategies, we demonstrated the effectiveness of audit-and-feedback for reducing overutilization of CT C-spine imaging in the ED.<sup>5</sup> In this study, we aim to characterize the longitudinal effectiveness of our prior audit-and-feedback intervention on CT overutilization.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This was an observational study of a cohort of emergency clinicians within a single academic department of emergency medicine that staffs five emergency departments in a regional healthcare system. Clinicians in this department were previously enrolled in a trial of audit-and-feedback strategies to reduce overutilization of CT C-spine, and at the conclusion of the trial, all clinicians received individualized digital feedback on their own practice patterns, including their individual CT C-spine overutilization rate and the number of CTs they ordered per month. For one year after the conclusion of the trial, we reviewed the medical records of every patient who underwent CT C-spine during a one-week audit period each quarter. These data were used to calculate the cohort&rsquo;s average overutilization rate, defined as the percentage of patients who underwent CT C-spine but were low-risk by the NEXUS C-spine Rule. The outcomes of interest in this study were the CT overutilization rates at three, six, nine, and twelve months after the conclusion of the trial.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>There were 130 emergency clinicians included in the observation cohort, who ordered 755 CT C-spine studies during the four audit periods. The pre-trial baseline overutilization rate was 47% of CT C-spine studies, decreasing to 33% and 36% in the intervention groups by the end of the trial. After the conclusion of the trial, the overutilization rate across the entire cohort remained lower than baseline at all time points: 36% at three months, 30% at six months, 35% at nine months, and 33% at twelve months.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Our results provide evidence that digital audit-and-feedback is associated with a sustained reduction in CT overutilization for at least one year after the intervention. These results support audit-and-feedback as an effective strategy to sustain changes in clinician behavior.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, <I>et al</I>. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group. <I>N Engl J Med.</I> 2000;<b>343</b>(2):94&ndash;9.</p></li><li><p>Mills AM, Raja AS, Marin JR. Optimizing diagnostic imaging in the emergency department. <I>Acad Emerg Med.</I> 2015;<b>22</b>(5):625&ndash;31.</p></li><li><p>Bellolio MF, Heien HC, Sangaralingham LR, <I>et al</I>. Increased computed tomography utilization in the emergency department and its association with hospital admission. <I>West J Emerg Med.</I> 2017;<b>18</b>(5):835&ndash;45.</p></li><li><p>Evans CS, Arthur R, Kane M, <I>et al</I>. Incidental radiology findings on computed tomography studies in emergency department patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. <I>Ann Emerg Med.</I> 2022;<b>80</b>(3):243&ndash;56.</p></li><li><p>Chamberlin KT, Ditullio C, Rossman J, <I>et al</I>. A randomized controlled trial of audit-and-feedback strategies to reduce imaging overutilization in the emergency department. <I>BMJ Qual Saf.</I> Accepted for publication, March 2025.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chamberlin, K., Ditullio, C., Reznek, M., Kotkowski, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.211</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.211</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[211 Sustaining changes in clinician behavior using audit and feedback]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A158</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A158</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A160?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[214 Reducing errors by improving confidence & knowledge in paediatric and obstetric anaesthesia through quick reference cards]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A160?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>In paediatric and obstetric anaestheisa, quick access to critical information such as mediation dosages, equipment sizes, and emergency protocols is essential for improving response times and reducing errors. Traditional resources, such as electronic protocols and textbooks, can cause delays during emergencies. Research has shown that quick reference tools can reduce cognitive load and improve performance in high-pressure situations. A study by Harrison et al. (2020) found that using quick reference handbooks in obstetric anaesthesia reduced time to access critical information by 30%, improving response times in emergencies. Additionally, cognitive aids have been demonstrated to improve patient outcomes by decreasing the likelihood of errors during emergency management (Goldhaber-Fiebert &amp; Howard, 2013).</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This project was started in June 2024 at Lister Hospital, and involved distributing quick reference cards containing essential anaesthetic information to staff working in paediatric and obstetric cases (nurses, doctors, and theatre staff). Firstly baseline data on staff knowledge of medication dosages, equipment sizes, and emergency protocols were collated via a pre-intervention survey.</p><p>Quick reference cards were then created, outlining essential information needed in paediatric anaesthesia;</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Doses of induction agents, muscle relaxants and reversal agents for paediatric anaesthesia</p></li><li><p>Doses of analgesic agents for paediatric analgesia</p></li><li><p>Calculations of weights of paediatric patients based on age</p></li><li><p>Calculations of ETT and LMA sizes</p></li><li><p>Normal ranges of observations depending on age of paediatric patient</p></li><li><p>Maximum doses of local anaesthetics and doses of intralipid</p></li><li><p>Protocol for treating major obstetric haemorrhage</p></li><li><p>Protocol for treating eclampsia and induction of women with pre-eclampsia</p></li></l></p><p>These cards were then distributed to the staff as outlined above, and a follow-up survey was conducted 2 months later. In addition to quantifying staff confidence in knowledge of information above, feedback was also requested about the cards.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Effects of our intervention were evaluated using anonymised online surveys and through in-person discussions. Statistical analysis was performed using a Mann-Whitney U-Test to assess changes in staff knowledge and confidence. Regarding the individual bullet points above there was a significant increase in the confidence and knowledge of staff members across all domains, <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref> with a Z-score of 6.154 and a concurrent p value of &lt; 0.01.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 214 Figure 1</no><link locator="214_F1"></fig></p><p>Staff reported the quick reference cards were easy to use and also improved their perceived response times during critical events. The cards are now distributed during departmental induction and are worn on lanyards or kept in easily accessible areas. This is vital when comparing their use to mobile applications, where less time was required to review essential information on physical cards. The cards were relied on more by junior staff versus senior staff, potentially because of relative inexperience in dealing with obstetric and paediatric emergencies.</p><p>Working in stressful and unfamiliar environments often cause delays in patient management due to increased cognitive load, and therefore emergency scenarios within those environments confounds the delays. The use of these cognitive aids was reported to reduce errors by team members, by reducing the amount of mental effort required and therefore improves patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Harrison A, Howard SK, Gaba, DM. Use of cognitive AIDS in anaesthesia emergencies: a review of best practices. <I>British J Anaesth</I> 2020;<b>214</b>(3):233&ndash;239.</p></li><li><p>Goldhaber-Fiebert SN, Howard SK. Cognitive support and crisis management in anaesthesia. <I>Anaesthesiology</I> 2013;<b>118</b>(3):741&ndash;752.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robinow, A., Hopley, E., Batley, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.214</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.214</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[214 Reducing errors by improving confidence & knowledge in paediatric and obstetric anaesthesia through quick reference cards]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A160</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A161</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A161?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[215 Learning from excellence: introducing safety-II practice in a major trauma centre emergency department in Scotland. An ongoing quality improvement project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A161?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>This work is an ongoing quality improvement project in the Emergency Department (ED) in Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Scotland involving all the staff working in and supporting the department and patients.</p><p>Concern about healthcare professionals&rsquo; work-related well-being, moral injury and burnout is only increasing. Learning only from &lsquo;mistakes&rsquo; fuels this. The overall aim of this Quality Improvement Project was to introduce Learning from Excellence (LfE) into the culture, ethos and practice of the department. Aiming to increase positive feedback, improve departmental morale, inter-specialty relations and promote safety-II learning. Weekly clinical governance meetings focused on DATIX (&lsquo;error&rsquo;) reports but there was no established way to collect or learn from everyday excellence.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This project was initially assessed and discussed with stakeholders. Issues were multifaceted, including: engagement, ease of reporting and dissemination of learning. An Ishikawa diagram of origins of issues related to the project was presented. Evolution of these was then further analysed through Appreciative Inquiry (AI).</p><p>Our initial aim was to increase engagement i.e. number of submissions to our LfE programme (known locally as &lsquo;Greatix&rsquo;).</p><p>Re-launching the department&rsquo;s LfE programme meant colleagues reported peer excellence and we sent an email and handmade card. This involved an email and poster campaign, microtutorials and &lsquo;How to&rsquo; posters. Our AI was at 6 months. This was qualitative, conducted by email questionnaire and focussed on the individual experience. It was distributed to those giving and receiving these awards, in and outwith ED. It led to the successful introduction of a QR code reporting system.</p><p>A Standard Operating Procedure for the introduction of LfE into other departments is in draft, as numerous specialties and other hospitals want wish to launch similar systems after seeing our potential positive impact).</p><p>Our Safety-II phase (launched June 2024) discussed LfE around two DATIX incidents, in addition to excellence reports for other clinical interactions and trends.</p><p>A provisional Gantt timeline mapped a change every two months. Below summarises real interventions:</p><p>Round 1 (December 2022 &ndash; January 2023) Email and poster push.</p><p>Round 2 (March 2023 &ndash; April 2023) Microtutorials re: Greatix.</p><p>Round 3 (May 2023 &ndash; June 2023) &lsquo;How to&rsquo; poster campaign.</p><p>Round 4 (July 2023 &ndash; August 2023) SNAP survey and mini-appreciative inquiry.</p><p>Round 5 (September 2023) QR code introduction</p><p>Round 6 (February 2024) New Year plan/Qi advert</p><p>Round 7 (June 2024 &ndash; ongoing) Clinical Governance Safety-II launch</p><p>Round 8 (November 2024) Back from the Edge</p><p>Round 9 (January 2025) Maternity maintenance</p><p>We send monthly regular posters (3 and now 6 monthly) and updates by email to staff groups, w. With seasonal changes of posters with the QR code in the department. Our QI department also used artificial intelligence to compile a thematic analysis of submissions and poem (shared hospital wide). Posters were made and presented at the 2024 LfE conference, UK. </p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Our Ggreatix submissions are now in double figures most months, increased from often none most months. Qualitative results from our AI identified 5 themes in our reports and professionals describing a feeling of appreciation, being overwhelmed and grateful for at receiving positive feedback. They also emphasised the importance of this in countering the emotional impact of caring and moral injury sustained at work. </p><p>Our introduction of safety-II is in its infancy, but we will be using a similar appreciative inquiry methodology to assess its impact. Feedback from one of our initial sessions has been positive.</p><p>There is no patient involvement in this project but through promotion of learning and positive cultural change, we hope to improve care.</p><p>Our impact is best emphasised through our qualitative mini-AI responses: &lsquo;caught me just at the beginning of a near full burnout and completely changed my outlook for the week ahead... the effect can be profound.&rsquo;</p><p>Initially departmental culture and reluctance to consider excellence a learning modality was an issue. The rotational nature of our team, technology issues with the DATIX reporting system and the tightened regulation and limitation of personal device use for work are now much more problematic.</p><p>Our LfE and safety-II journey is ongoing. It is one of marginal but impactful gains on a work culture level. Those originally sceptical are now submitting nominations. Be consistent, learn from everything and learn from excellence.</p><p>We have no conflicts of interest. No ethical approval was required.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stevenson, L., Waite, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.215</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.215</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[215 Learning from excellence: introducing safety-II practice in a major trauma centre emergency department in Scotland. An ongoing quality improvement project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A161</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A162</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A162?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[216 'I know my asthma- using authentic patient engagement to understand children, young people and carers experience of asthma management in the community]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A162?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Context</st><p>Connecting Care for Children (a child heath integrated care collaborative) codesigned an information leaflet about the 2-working day asthma review. This was given to children/young people and their families who attended the Emergency Department or were admitted to inpatient wards with an exacerbation of asthma in a Northwest London hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Problem</st><p>London Asthma Standards for Children and Young People recommend community follow-up within 2&ndash;5 days after a hospital visit for asthma exacerbation, to ensure recovery and optimize chronic management. However, between 2017&ndash;2019 only 18% of children and adolescents in England received follow up in 2 working days. Based on the lived experience of children &amp; young people with asthma and their families, we aimed to better understand why the uptake for these reviews has been low and use this information to improve the intervention of 2-working day review and care of children in the community immediately after a wheeze attack. To better understand young people and families&rsquo; experience of asthma management, a series of semi-structured face-to-face interviews were undertaken in A&amp;E and paediatric wards with children/young people who attended with an exacerbation of asthma, and their families.</p></sec><sec><st>Intervention</st><p>A patient information leaflet was created providing education for families about the 2-working day review and how to arrange this in the community. This resource was given to the target audience and feedback gathered on their asthma management and barriers to care.</p></sec><sec><st>Strategy for change</st><p>1. Leaflet codesign phase: An information leaflet based on the London Asthma Standards for Children and Young People was co-designed with 8 patients/pares, the Northwest London Asthma Big Room and a Primary Care Physician. The leaflet went through 7 cycles of change.</p><p>2. Pathway implementation phase: The leaflet was given to families in hospital with asthma exacerbation to encourage them to request follow-up in primary care. We interviewed families 5&ndash;7 days post-discharge via telephone/email to assess the leaflet&rsquo;s impact. Family interviews were used to improve understanding of barriers to care and to guide the design of the next cycle of quality improvement. Patients described their experience of managing asthma in the community, managing asthma exacerbations, and previous experiences of the 2-working day review.</p></sec><sec><st>Measurement of improvement</st><p>The interviews underwent thematic analysis to better understand patient&rsquo;s experience and barriers to care.</p><p>How patients, carers, or family members were involved in the project</p><p>Patients and carers were directly involved throughout both phases of the project giving direct insights and feedback on leaflet design and experience of care.</p></sec><sec><st>Effects of changes</st><p>Carers felt more confident requesting follow up appointments due to understanding of the rationale for this. 2 patients required follow up beyond 5 days, and 1 patient required further exacerbation treatment. It is anticipated that better parental understanding will improve engagement with healthcare providers and the care of children and young people with asthma in the days after hospital discharge.</p><p>Family interviews provided insights into the challenges of living with asthma:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Feelings of embarrassment</p></li><li><p>Fear of exacerbations</p></li><li><p>The mental and social strain on carers e.g. responsibility to recognise signs of an exacerbation and initiation of acute management.</p></li><li><p>Key barriers to accessing care were identified:</p></li><li><p>Difficulties in securing primary care appointments</p></li><li><p>Perceived lack of clinician understanding</p></li><li><p>Gaps in parental education about asthma management</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Lessons learned</st><p>This project was initially clinician-designed, focusing on leaflet design, implementation and feedback. However, on discussion with families, it became clear that community asthma management is influenced by a range of factors including education, relationship with care providers and social circumstance. It is essential to understand patient experience to guide quality improvement projects based on patient feedback and needs. </p></sec><sec><st>Messages for others</st><p>Relationships between patients and their care providers, carer&rsquo;s confidence in asthma management and the impact of asthma diagnosis on each family is unique. Carers need focused discussion and education to better-understand their child&rsquo;s asthma and the rationale behind the 2-working day review. These discussions need to consider personal bias and individual levels of understanding.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bell, C., Awan, Z., Watson, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.216</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.216</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[216 'I know my asthma- using authentic patient engagement to understand children, young people and carers experience of asthma management in the community]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A162</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A163</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A163?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[217 Enhancing efficiency and reducing costs in a high volume arthroplasty centre: a multidisciplinary approach]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A163?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Context</st><p>This project was undertaken at the Golden Jubilee University National Hospital, within NHS Scotland. The GJUNH performs ~6000 joint replacements annually, it is one of the largest arthroplasty centres in Europe. Its goal is to help to drive down national waiting lists for surgery by maximising throughput through the inpatient service, whilst minimising downtime and cancellations in theatre.</p><p>The project described involved all members of the Orthopaedic multidisciplinary team, including surgeons, anaesthetists, managers, nursing and theatre staff, physiotherapists and administrators amongst others.</p></sec><sec><st>Problem</st><p>Following the pandemic, we found our patient population was increasingly frail and complex, as a result the number of cases performed at our institution was falling. This project sought to determine and address the issues leading to this fall in efficiency whilst delivering cost savings, ultimately ensuring that patients received surgical intervention as early as possible. The issue was particularly relevant due to the significant increase in waiting lists following the COVID pandemic. </p><p>Assessment of problem and analysis of its causes</p><p>We undertook a process mapping exercise to further develop our understanding of our system and identify potential areas for improvement, with a focus on reducing variation. In an effort to empower our colleagues, we invited all staff members across the team to submit potential ideas for improvement. We sought informal feedback from patients about our service</p><p>We subsequently held a focus group with staff members to identify particular problems to concentrate on across the multidisciplinary team. Topics identified were communicated to all staff members electronically, whilst simultaneously inviting them to attend and contribute to our group quality improvement day described below.</p></sec><sec><st>Intervention</st><p>Having cancelled the majority of clinical activity, we invited all members of our multidisciplinary team to take part in a group quality improvement day, based on the Model for Improvement. Each team member was allocated to a group, with each group tasked with tackling one of the issues identified prior. Care was taken to ensure that each group contained not only team members from across the multidisciplinary team, but also appropriate expertise to tackle the problem in hand. Each group was asked to feedback to the wider team at the end of the day to describe the strategy they had devised. We focused on eight different topics, including issues such as streamlining patient flow within theatres, reducing the cost of equipment brought in on loan, minimising last minute cancellations and optimising surgical tray usage.</p><p>An example of a change to practice devised was removing instruments which were used only occasionally from surgical trays and packing them separately &ndash; termed &lsquo;lean trays.&rsquo; This initiative reduced the number of instruments requiring sterilisation on a daily basis through our in-house sterilisation unit, maximising use of available resources.</p></sec><sec><st>Strategy for change</st><p>To allow implementation, we formed a quality improvement forum which met monthly to follow up on each workstream. Timelines were dependent on individual projects. Where changes were implemented, information was not only disseminated via management structures, but the aforementioned quality improvement groups were asked to communicate the change to their colleagues. Feedback was sought via the quality improvement forum to ensure that implementation was being managed appropriately.</p></sec><sec><st>Measurement of improvement</st><p>Data on improvement is available for some workstreams, with further work underway. We measured the effect of change through resource saving or increased clinical activity.</p><p>Please describe how you have involved patients, carers, or family members in the project</p><p>Feedback from patients was sought in the initial stage of the project on an informal basis, to help identify issues which might be addressed through this work. </p></sec><sec><st>Effects of changes</st><p>The &lsquo;lean tray&rsquo; project, once fully implemented, will result in 7500 fewer trays requiring sterilisation annually, resulting in an estimated saving of &gt;&pound;200 k (&gt;240 k EUR) to our institution, as well as a reduction in CO2 emissions of over 11000 kg. Similarly, the project focusing on reducing loan kit usage results in &gt;&pound;100 k (&gt;120 k EUR) savings on an annual basis. More broadly, the group of initiatives developed through this programme resulted in a 20% increase in activity within the first three months following the programme. We estimate this will allow us to undertake a further 250 joint replacements annually, with further improvements anticipated. </p></sec><sec><st>Lessons learned</st><p>We have identified that early involvement of key stakeholders is critical to ensuring success of individual workstreams. A further cycle of the project is running this year and we plan to invite stakeholders external to the team to maximise the chances of success.</p></sec><sec><st>Messages for others</st><p>Empowering team members at a grassroots level at our institution has allowed development of a variety of quality improvement workstreams, resulting in both financial savings and improved efficiency.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mahmood, F., Gee, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.217</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.217</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[217 Enhancing efficiency and reducing costs in a high volume arthroplasty centre: a multidisciplinary approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A163</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A164</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A167?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[223 Quality improvement project aimed at strengthening psychological safety among physicians and nurses in a nursing ward]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A167?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>The LUMC Hematology ward, providing care to patients with highly complex hematological treatments, is facing significant challenges due to a shortage of 9.84 full-time equivalents of hematology nurses and increased sick leave up to 25%. This has resulted in a reduction of 8&ndash;10 available beds and an increased workload for the current nursing staff. Moreover, the collaboration between nurses and physicians appears to be suboptimal, and there is a perceived lack of psychological safety within the team. The aim of this improvement project was to strengthening psychological safety among physicians and nurses in a nursing ward.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>The evaluation of the interventions was measured using a before and after design. The primary aim was for at least 25% of the target group to experience an improvement in psychological safety. The quality improvement project, conducted on the Hematology ward from May 2023 to May 2024, involved 50 nurses, three caregivers, 13 attending physicians, and five nurse practitioners. The project included a determinants analysis to identify key issues, followed by the selection of interventions and implementation strategies. Psychological safety was measured using a validated questionnaire consisted of seven questions (1) complemented with four open-ended questions to gather qualitative insight. Additionally, patient experience was measured by collecting Patient Reported Experience Measures.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Before the intervention, 26 out of 39 participants (67%) perceived the collaboration between physicians and nurses as suboptimal, mainly due to communication issues. Communication was identified as the main barrier, while human factors (e.g. passion, motivation and the drive to collaborate) were considered the key facilitators. Based on these findings, various interventions were implemented, including motivational discussions, coaching, and team-building activities.</p><p>Although no significant difference was demonstrated in the perception of psychological safety between the pre- and post-measurements, 12 out of 26 participants (46%) reported a positive change in collaboration. All patients (17 out of 17, 100%) rated the collaboration and communication between physicians and nurses as good.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>While the primary goal of achieving a 25% improvement in psychological safety was not met, the quality improvement project showed a cautiously positive development in communication and collaboration within the studied group.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Edmonson AC. De onbevreesde organisatie. 3th ed. Amsterdam/Antwerpen: Uitgeverij Business Contact; 2019.</p></li><li><p>Edmonson AC. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. <I>Administrative Science Quarterly</I> 1999 June;<b>44</b>(2):350&ndash;383.</p></li><li><p>Derksen K. Goed teamwork. <I>Hoe teams beter kunnen presteren en floreren.</I> 5th ed. Amsterdam: Boom; 2021.</p></li><li><p>Homan AC, Van Knippenberg D, Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW. Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. <I>Journal of Applied Psychology</I> 2007;<b>92</b>(5):1189&ndash;1199.</p></li><li><p>Edmonson AC. <I>Teaming to innovate.</I> 2nd ed. San Francisco Jossey-Bass; 2014.</p></li><li><p>Rudolph JW, Pian-Smith MCM, Minehart RD. Setting the stage for speaking up: psychological safety and directing care in acute care collaboration. <I>BJA.</I> 2022 Nov 11;<b>128</b>(1):3&ndash;7.</p></li><li><p>Van Dijk H, Cloudt S, Destructieve dynamieken: 9 problematische patronen in organisaties en hoe die te doorbreken. Meppel: Boom; 2023.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paauw, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.223</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.223</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[223 Quality improvement project aimed at strengthening psychological safety among physicians and nurses in a nursing ward]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A167</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A168</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A169?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[226 Co-designing in quality management: developing a data-driven business intelligence dashboard for 14-day readmission at a Taiwan medical center]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A169?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Reducing unplanned 14-day readmissions is crucial for enhancing patient safety and healthcare efficiency.<sup>1</sup> Our medical center in Taiwan developed a visual dashboard integrating IDSS and BI to monitor readmissions by diagnosis, offering real-time insights for clinicians and administrators to identify trends and optimize care.<sup>2&ndash;5</sup> Through Experience-Based Co-Design (EBCD), <sup>6,7</sup> we collaborated with staff, administrators, and patients to develop a user-centered solution that enhances decision-making and improves patient outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>The study combined exploratory and prospective methods. First, we conducted exploratory research from January 2023 to October 2024, in which a collaborative team tested the system&rsquo;s usability and functionality. Experience-based co-design involves gathering user and staff experiences to identify key touch points. The plan includes: (1) Forming a dedicated task force to develop the dashboard. (2) Gathering feedback from clinical, administrative, and patient sectors. (3) Organizing joint user-staff collaboration. (4) Facilitating co-design groups: Developing a business intelligence dashboard using Microsoft Power BI Desktop for timely monitoring. (5) Reporting and evaluating the project: Establishing a process for indicator validation to ensure data quality. (6) Engaging leaders from medical and administrative departments in a data feedback event. In the second phase, using the Delphi method, three expert panels assessed the dashboard&rsquo;s collaborative integration on a 5-points Likert scale, focusing on data handling, user interface familiarity, and iterative improvements.</p></sec><sec><st>Result</st><p>Using a data-driven, problem-oriented approach, five core outpatient flow KPIs were integrated: patient wait time, doctor wait time, consultation-to-billing time, prescription readiness time, and pickup time. Each KPI has defined metrics for real-time tracking and breakdowns. Dashboard features includes:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>User-friendly interface &ndash; Provides clear visualizations and rapid access to data for enhanced usability.</p></li><li><p>Drill-down analysis &ndash; Enables filtering by time, patient departments, and wards for deeper insights.</p></li><li><p>Comparative insights &ndash; Utilizes color-coded KPIs and benchmarking to support quick performance evaluation.</p></li><li><p>Seamless integration &ndash; Connects with existing hospital information systems to ensure real-time data synchronization.</p></li><li><p>Custom filters &ndash; Highlights critical deviations and emerging trends through customizable conditions.</p></li><li><p>Role-based access &ndash; Maintains data security by assigning permissions based on user roles.</p></li></l></p><p>In terms of measuring the level of collaboration, the scores for each item are: Level of mastery by the data responsible units over BI data sources for 4.33 points. Familiarity of the data responsible units with Power BI for 5.00 points. Level of improvement and revision required by the data responsible units for BI enhancement for 4.33 points. Level of communication and discussion between the data responsible units and BI experts for 4.67points.</p><p>EBCD and co-design in healthcare enhance the experiences of indicator owners and leaders by addressing their needs, promoting collaborative goal-setting, and optimizing resource utilization. However, implementing co-design in clinical settings presents challenges, including resource constraints, staff turnover, and sustaining long-term user engagement. To overcome these challenges, our study recommends continuous engagement through feedback loops and pre/post-intervention comparisons to assess impact effectively. By adopting an EBCD-driven quality tool, our medical center developed a decision-support dashboard for 14-day readmission tracking, improving patient flow management. This project demonstrates the power of collaborative design in driving sustainable healthcare improvements, emphasizing continuous patient and stakeholder engagement for lasting impact.</p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Park Y, Bang Y, Kwon J. Clinical decision support system and hospital readmission reduction: evidence from US panel data. <I>Decision Support Systems</I> 2022;<b>159</b>:113816.</p></li><li><p>Enes J, Exp&oacute;sito RR, Touri&ntilde;o J. BDWatchdog: Real-time monitoring and profiling of Big Data applications and frameworks. <I>Future Generation Computer Systems</I>. 2018;<b>87</b>:420&ndash;437.</p></li><li><p>Eom S, Kim E. A survey of decision support system applications (1995&ndash;2001). <I>Journal of the Operational Research Society</I> 2006;<b>57</b>(11):1264&ndash;1278.</p></li><li><p>Power DJ. Understanding data-driven decision support systems. <I>Information Systems Management</I> 2008;<b>25</b>(2):149&ndash;154.</p></li><li><p>Turban E. Decision support systems in hospitals. <I>Michigan Hospitals</I> 1983;<b>19</b>(8):28&ndash;34.</p></li><li><p>Donetto S, Pierri P, Tsianakas V, Robert G. Experience-based co-design and healthcare improvement: realizing participatory design in the public sector. <I>The Design Journal</I> 2015;<b>18</b>(2):227&ndash;248.</p></li><li><p>Van Citters A. Experience-based co-design of health care services. Boston, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement. 2017.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hsu, P.-J., Huang, H. F., Huang, S.-T., Chuang, P.-Y., Jerng, J.-S., Chen, S.-Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.226</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.226</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[226 Co-designing in quality management: developing a data-driven business intelligence dashboard for 14-day readmission at a Taiwan medical center]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A169</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A170</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A102-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[138 Cognitive behavioural therapy service, southern health and social care trust, wait list review- improving access to CBT service]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A102-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Northern Ireland has higher levels of mental ill health than any other region in the UK.<sup>1</sup>Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is short term evidence-based treatment recommended by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) for a range of mental health conditions, including Depression and Anxiety Disorders. The Southern Health and Social Care Trusts (SHSCT) &lsquo;Mental Health Cognitive Behavioural therapy service&rsquo; offers assessment and treatment to service users aged 18 +, referred by their General Practitioner or internally from other mental health services.</p><p>Referral data identified a substantial increase in the level of demand for the CBT service over the last five years and associated with the increasing demand, the number of people on the SHSCT CBT waiting list also increased. Northern Ireland waiting times have been reported to be the worst in the United Kingdom, and amongst some of the worst in Europe.<sup>2</sup> Northern Irelands Ministerial targets recommend that those referred for psychological therapy services should begin treatment within 13 weeks of referral.<sup>3</sup> In April 2023 the SHCT CBT wait times were 91 weeks with 621 individuals waiting assessment within the service.</p><p>Northern Ireland is facing a substantial backlog of care exacerbated by the pandemic.<sup>4</sup> However other factors were also impacting the longest wait times within the SHSCT CBT service. Internally within the service some client treatment tails were in excess of NICE guidelines. We became aware that there were reduced new patient appointment slots due to inconsistent adherence to attendance policy within service. We were able to identify that many of the referrals into the CBT service were not appropriate, which highlighted referrers lack of knowledge around psychological therapy and treatability. This also had a direct impact upon client lack of knowledge about readiness and expectations of psychological therapies/CBT.A survey by Rethink Mental Illness, painted a picture of overwhelmed mental health services struggling to provide timely and consistent care, they described the impact of waiting times on individuals and wider public services, with 80% experiencing a deterioration in their mental health as they waited for input.<sup>5</sup>  </p><p>The overall vision for our project was to reduce the longest wait time for clients to receive a routine CBT assessment within ministerial target of 13 weeks. The initial aim for our project was to reduce our CBT wait list time for a routine CBT assessment by 45%. We hoped to achieve this target by February 2025. This will help to ensure adherence to regional guidance to see that clients are able to access the right service at the right time as indicated by Northern Irelands Mental Health care pathway.<sup>6</sup> Ensuring safe, timely, efficient and effective care.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>This project took place within the Southern Trust Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Service, a small team of 11 WTE staff working across the trust. An initial project group was set up in May 2023, when skills and support from the Southern Trust QI team was utilised. Following initial progress last year with change methodologies, some reduction in wait times and being confident that the gains were sustainable, we spread the change ideas beyond the initial area of testing to a much wider scale:</p><p>An administration Validation process was proving effective in reducing numbers of clients on the waiting list and therefore we spread the admin validation and increased the number of clients monthly who were validated. Staff had commenced use of a caseload analysis tool which was reviewed within operational supervisions sessions, and it has proven to be effective to ensure staff align treatment tails to clinical recommendations.</p><p>New processes were put in place, for example updates to the attendance policy within the services,&rsquo; Integrated Elective Access Policy&rsquo; were implemented and helped to increase the availability of assessment slots. Staff within the service developed a &lsquo;Screening Form&rsquo; to help ensure referrals into the service were appropriate, the form focuses on clinical suitability and readiness for psychological therapies. This form was used in several ways within the service, firstly to clinically validate clients already on the CBT wait list. The screening form was also used within a pilot of the updated process for referring clients from other parts of the Mental health service to the CBT service. The service commenced the screening of all GP referrals in December 2024, the screening form is used in this process. These procedures have worked extremely well and use of the screening form is now regular practice within the CBT service</p><p>The updates to the processes have seen that any service users discharged due to lack of readiness or unsuitability are directed to most appropriate service in a timely fashion. Staff knowledge has improved with use of the screening process and the overall process has Improved engagement with stakeholders.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The administration validation exercise seen that 376 clients were discharged from the CBT wait list, 45% discharge rate. Data from clinical validation, 42% discharge rate. Therefore clients who require another service do not have to wait significant time in the wrong place. Wait list is freed up so that those who require CBT can access in a more timely manner. Data of increase in assessment slots- following IEAP guidance for new assessments, created a total of 70 appointment slots rebooked which otherwise would have been lost. Pilot over 12 weeks of Screening GP referrals- <I>48</I>  <I>%</I> were not suitable to be added the CBT wait list, they were either discharged and signposted to Community and Voluntary agencies or redirected to another mental health team, ensuring the clients were seen at the right time by the right service</p><p>Overall data of our longest wait time has reduced to 33 weeks, with 260 clients waiting. Compared to April 23 was 91 weeks with 627 clients waiting. Equating to a 64% reduction in the longest waits, exceeding our aim of 45% reduction by February 2025.</p><p>We also reflected upon the importance of communication, involvement and meaningful engagement of not only our project team but the wider CBT service and stakeholders involved. This was important to ensure staff felt they were involved on the journey of change to alleviate apprehension and emotions that can arise. In addition good communication to help identify and problem solve barriers that may arise during the project for example the impact on other services. Open communication across the CBT service has been integral to ensuring all staff feel listened to, involved in change and valued and this in turn has promoted a positive and productive transition to new improved ways of working to ensure best outcomes for service users. There is an increase in team morale, job satisfaction and a sense of pride.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Department of Health, 2018 Service Framework for Mental Health and Wellbeing. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.health-ni.gov.uk/sites/default/files/consultations/health/MHSF%20-%20Service%20Framework%20-%202018-2021.PDF</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Northern Ireland Assembly, 2021. The unhealthy state of hospital wait lists. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.niassembly.gov.uk/globalassets/documents/raise/publications/2017-2022/2021/health/7921.pdf</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Health, Social services and Public safety,2010. A strategy for the Development of Psychological Therapy Services. https://www.health-ni.gov.uk/sites/default/files/publications/dhssps/strategy-development-psychological-therapy-service.pdf</p></li><li><p>British Medical Association, 2024 &lsquo;&rsquo;NHS under pressure Northern Ireland. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.bma.org.uk/advice-and-support/nhs-delivery-and-workforce/pressures/nhs-under-pressure-northern-ireland</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Rethink Mental Illness,2024. New survey reveals stark impact of NHS mental health treatment waiting times. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.rethink.org/news-and-stories/media-centre/2024/06/new-survey-reveals-stark-impact-of-nhs-mental-health-treatment-waiting-times/</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Regional Mental Health care pathway, 2014. https://www.northerntrust.hscni.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Regional-mental-health-care-pathway-1.pdf</p></li><li><p>Department of Health, 2021. Elective Care Framework Restart, Recovery and Redesign. https://www.health-ni.gov.uk/sites/default/files/publications/health/doh-elective-care-framework-restart-recovery-redesign.pdf</p></li><li><p>Patient and client council, 2018 Our lived experience of waiting for healthcare People in Northern Ireland share their story. https://www.communityni.org/sites/default/files/2018-03/Our%20lived%20experience%20of%20waiting%20for%20healthcare%20-%20Waiting%20Times%20Report%201-3-18.pdf</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Proctor, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.138</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.138</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[138 Cognitive behavioural therapy service, southern health and social care trust, wait list review- improving access to CBT service]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A102</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A103</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A104-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[139 Result for developing a care patway for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A104-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The evolving landscape of healthcare, along with the increasing demands and changing population demographics, requires a reorganization of care delivery methods. Therefore, we developed a blueprint for care pathways, based on the quadruple aim, to improve the quality of care delivery and promote interprofessional teamwork. In this abstract, we present the results of the care pathway for patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) using the blueprint for care pathway development.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A new method, the Blueprint for Care Pathway Development, was implemented at Radboudumc</p><p>Based on our experience with care pathways at Radboudumc, we created a blueprint to develop a basic care pathway: the step-by-step plan. This plan consists of four main phases &mdash; the analysis, design, implementation, and evaluation and monitoring phases &mdash; which together provide a logical and structured approach to (re)developing care pathways. We have now completed the basic pathway for several conditions and are currently working on the bronze phase, aiming to embed these pathways into the hospital&rsquo;s systems (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>).</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 139 Figure 1</no><link locator="139_F1"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Patient experience better healthcare:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Shortening of lead time of the care pathway</p></li><li><p>Patients have one point of contact</p></li><li><p>Patients know from the start what they can expect from the care Higher patient satisfaction</p></li><li><p>Patients have better guidance in the follow-up</p></li><li><p>Every patient over 65 years receives a geriatric screening (clinical frailty score). By switching the screening to the nurse, we use 30% fewer geriatricians</p></li><li><p>By decreasing the length of stay of patients in the hospital, the CO2 emission is reduced by 1037 kg each year.</p></li><li><p>Working uniformly in Electronic Health Record (EHR)</p></li><li><p>Dashboard for monitoring indicators and milestones: The blue print is since 3 years implemented in Radboudumc. The first effects can be seen in the care path of AAA. For the AAA care pathway we have developed a dashboard for monitoring set goals, so that we can manage them.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kooke, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.139</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.139</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[139 Result for developing a care patway for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A104</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A104</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A104-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[140 Influence of low literacy on hospital visits and what to do about it]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A104-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Gelre hospitals increasingly experience limited health literacy as a problem in communication with patients. Regularly, patients who have difficulty reading do not attend appointments or are not well prepared. This risks losses. For example, when surgery cannot be performed as scheduled, this results in financial loss for the hospital, loss of health for the patient and frustration for all parties. In 2023, the client council provided Gelre hospitals with a number of recommendations on how to improve this situation. This advice was successfully followed in 2024.</p><p>People with limited health literacy visit doctors and hospitals more often. They find it difficult to assess the information they get there. Assessing which treatment method is best for them makes that extra difficult. While we want the patient to be in more control over their own treatment and life!</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We are happy to share our success. Would you like to take our experience to your own hospital or healthcare institution? You can make a contribution by helping with this broad social problem. Then consider the following 6 advices:</p><p>  <unl>In conversation </unl>The patient is often dealing with emotions and stress. In direct contact with healthcare professionals, it is difficult to process and remember complicated information that will have a high impact on their life. This also applies to highly educated people! Do not use medical terms if it is not necessary or explain them. Regularly check whether the patient understands what you say as a doctor. Do not ask: <I>&lsquo;Do you understand what I mean?&rsquo;</I> Your patient will probably say &lsquo;Yes&rsquo; out of politeness. Do ask: &lsquo;<I>I would like to know if I explained it well. Can you repeat the things that are important now?&rsquo;</I> This is called the teach back method.</p><p>  <unl>Train your employees</unl> From receptionist to doctor: Inform and train your employees about how they can recognize patients who have difficulty reading and writing. The next step is to respond well to this. You can provide training or e-learning. A play Drama, in which recognizable situations and interventions are presented, provides a lot of relatability. It is a good opportunity to bring employees together in conversation about this theme. In the Netherlands, there are theater groups that have specialized in this. They help you to experience the difference.</p><p>  <unl>In writing</unl> Adapt your letters: Write short and at a maximum of B1 level. Place additional information in a folder and use images. Test the information in your hallways and waiting rooms: Is the signage in your building consistent and clear? What is on the noticeboards in your waiting rooms? Patients who have difficulty reading cannot properly assess what is important and what is not.</p><p>You can ask a patient panel consisting of people who have difficulty reading to test your hallways and waiting rooms. You can reduce the amount of textual information and instructions in your waiting room. Use images where possible and slow down the electronic screens.</p><p>  <unl>Online</unl> The ongoing digitalization of healthcare and service provision must not undermine everyone&rsquo;s right to good quality care. Offer support to patients who have difficulty consulting your information online and responding to your online messages. Ensure that patients can continue to receive your information in writing and orally if they cannot keep up in our new digital world.</p><p>  <unl>Partnership with your local library</unl> Low literacy is a broad social problem. As a hospital, you will not solve this and that is not expected of you. But you can contribute! In many Dutch libraries, people can go for help with reading, writing and using the internet. There are tailor-made help and courses. As a hospital, we can draw our patients&lsquo; attention to this help. You can contact your local library for cooperation.</p></sec><sec><st>Finally</st><p>  <unl>Pay attention to your choice of words!</unl> Low literacy is a concept in itself. But we do not address our patients as <I>low-literate</I>. We do not label people as &lsquo;low&rsquo;. We have patients who have difficulty reading and writing. We offer help to those who have difficulty with something.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>After following this advice, you will be more aware of the consequences of low literacy. You will learn to recognize the different ways in which it manifests. Your employees will learn to respond to this.</p><p>More appropriate approaches to the patient who generally tries to hide their low or limited literacy, are a different arrangement of (written) information in waiting rooms, signage to the clinics in hospitals and further cooperation with partners such as the municipality and the library.</p><p>This is a package of measures that leads to a better result for your patient and your hospital.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Borgonjen, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.140</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.140</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[140 Influence of low literacy on hospital visits and what to do about it]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A104</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A105</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A107-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[143 Explore, empower, evolve - promoting safety culture using human factors-based simulation and quality improvement strategy]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A107-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The opening of a brand-new hospital within the health board resulted in teams from different sites having to merge and work together in new departments. This move was complicated by the challenges faced during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p>There was an increased incidence of serious safety incidents following the reorganisation. Furthermore, staff reported a high degree of stress and burnout.</p><p>The human factors programme was one of the interventions that was developed in partnership with the relevant multidisciplinary teams with the aim of fostering a positive work environment that enhances team building, staff wellbeing and overall safety culture.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Using Human Factors principles, in-situ simulation was used to create realistic scenarios that replicate the complexities of real-world working environments. Participating staff were able to test the systems within which they work in real-time, evaluate processes and outcomes and collaboratively explore ideas for Quality Improvement.<sup>1</sup>  </p><p>The post simulation de-brief acts as a technique to provide a safe listening space &ndash; where all team members are encouraged to share their observations, experiences and empowered to improve what matters most to them.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The frequency of extremely significant patient safety incidents (never events) has dropped significantly from the mean. We do not claim direct association for this from this project. However, we believe that this project alongside other ongoing interventions has contributed to the overall safety statistics.</p><p>The human factors programme has been successful in empowering staff to bring about several impactful changes. These range from small continuous improvement projects (quiet for the count) to wider scale work to test and spread an updated WHO Surgical Safety Checklist.</p><p>Participant feedback has strongly suggested the usefulness of this project in promoting staff morale and improved team working.</p><p>We are currently evaluating the impact of the programme on the overall safety culture and expect to present the results during the conference.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Positive culture change can be brought about by using a combination of Human Factors and Quality Improvement approaches.</p><p>The key ingredient is to create a safe and effective listening space. Simulation can be used effectively to create the focus for the listening space.</p><p>Implementing actions from these conversations is essential in creating and sustaining the culture for Safety and Quality improvement.</p><p>In spaces where simulation is not appropriate, alternative methods can be substituted. This approach has been successfully used in other areas within the organisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Diaz-Navarro C, Jones B, Pugh G, <I>et al.</I> Improving quality through simulation; developing guidance to design simulation interventions following key events in healthcare. <I>Adv Simul.</I> 2024;<b>9</b>:30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-024-00300-8</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Subash, F., Scurr, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.143</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.143</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[143 Explore, empower, evolve - promoting safety culture using human factors-based simulation and quality improvement strategy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A107</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A107</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A107-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[144 Prescriptions dispensed from community pharmacy despite discontinuation at hospital discharge]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A107-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Patients frequently experience medication changes during hospital admissions, yet community pharmacies often lack timely communication regarding discontinued medications upon patient discharge. This gap creates potential for patient harm and unnecessary healthcare expenditures.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We conducted a prospective observational study at Mercy Hospital, a 234-bed regional medical center serving a diverse suburban and rural patient population. Adult patients with discontinued medications at hospital discharge were enrolled. Community pharmacies were contacted 5&ndash;10 and 25&ndash;35 days post-discharge to identify medications dispensed despite documented discontinuation. Descriptive statistics were employed to evaluate medication categories and frequency.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of identified discontinued medications, 77% remained active in pharmacy records at the 5&ndash;10 day post-discharge interval. At 25&ndash;35 days post-discharge, 25% of these medications were actively refilled. Antihypertensives represented the largest category of erroneously continued medications.</p></sec><sec><st>Discussion</st><p>The study revealed significant deficiencies in medication discontinuation communication between hospital discharge procedures and community pharmacy operations. Key interventions identified included clear instructions within discharge notes explicitly directing community pharmacies to discontinue medications.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Effective discharge communication to community pharmacies is crucial to prevent medication-related patient harm. This study highlights the necessity of structured communication processes, particularly for facilities without integrated electronic medical record systems.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflicts of Interest</st><p>None declared</p><p>No external funding supported this study.</p></sec><sec><st>Ethics Approval</st><p>Institutional Review Board approval was obtained from Mercy Hospital, Iowa City, IA, USA.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Farley, T., Izakovic, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.144</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.144</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[144 Prescriptions dispensed from community pharmacy despite discontinuation at hospital discharge]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A107</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A108</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A108-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[145 Providing post-operative pain control reduces use of the on call service. A QIP to improve self-reported satisfaction by 20% by May 2024 at station house medical centre through staff training]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A108-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Patient satisfaction at Station House Medial Centre although high at 97.40% on the day of surgery, at the 4 week follow up this reduced to 79.69% (using a 5 point Likert scale<sup>1</sup>). Addressing the dimension of effective care,<sup>2</sup> the Quality Improvement Program (QIP) will aim to increase post-operative patient satisfaction by 20%.</p></sec><sec><st>Intervention</st><p>All theatre staff were surveyed to assess their current knowledge on post-operative pain management. Once evaluated, training in post-operative pain management was developed, following discussion with staff and with reference to NICE Guidelines NG180.<sup>3</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) method<sup>4</sup> was used for this QIP. This model provides a rapid test of change, which can then be refined and retested. All patients over the age of 18 attending for surgery between November 2023 - May 2024, who consented to participate were included. As the program was undertaken in a private setting ethical approval from the Health Research Authority (HRA) wasn&rsquo;t required. However, guidance with respect to consent and participation information was taken from the HRA. Patients completed a patient satisfaction questionnaire whilst attending for their surgery appointment and at 4 weeks post operatively. 192 patients completed questionnaires prior to the implementation of the training program and 216 patients completed questionnaires post implementation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Prior to the initiation of the training program, patient satisfaction on the day of surgery was 97.40% (187 patients). However, this reduced to 79.69% (153 patients) at the 4 week follow up. Following staff training patient satisfaction on the day of surgery increased to 98.61% (213 patients) and at the 4 week follow up patient satisfaction was 93.98% (203 patients)</p></sec><sec><st>Discussion</st><p>The aim of the QIP was to increase patient satisfaction by 20%, an improvement of 15.8% is a very good improvement. In addition, the proportion of &lsquo;very happy&rsquo; patients had increased following implementation of the training program. The majority of patients were unhappy as they had post-operative pain. Due to a reduction in post-operative pain, the on call system was utilized less by patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Educating staff and taking the initiative to address patients concerns improves patient outcome. Improvements in patient outcomes will be further maintained by ongoing staff training and annual audits and further cycles.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>McLeod SA. (2019, August 03). Likert scale. <I>Simply Psychology</I>. https//www.simplypsychology.org/likert- scale.html</p></li><li><p>The Health Foundation. Quality improvement made simple; What everyone should know about healthcare quality improvement. 2021. The Health Foundation.</p></li><li><p>Perioperative care in adults NICE guideline [NG180] Published 19 August 2020.</p></li><li><p>Online library of Quality Service Improvement and Redesign tools. Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycles and the model for improvement. NHS England and NHS Improvement.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Olivelle, J. S., Olivelle, A. G., Olivelle, A. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.145</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.145</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[145 Providing post-operative pain control reduces use of the on call service. A QIP to improve self-reported satisfaction by 20% by May 2024 at station house medical centre through staff training]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A108</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A108</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A108-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[146 Can implementation of a complex outpatient antimicrobial therapy program reduce readmissions for patients with bone and joint infections?]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A108-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is widely used to manage infections requiring parenteral therapy in outpatient settings, offering benefits such as cost savings and improved patient satisfaction.<inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">  <sup>1 2</sup>  </inter-ref> Complex Outpatient Antimicrobial Therapy (COpAT) builds on OPAT, incorporating both intravenous and oral antibiotics for prolonged or high-risk treatments.<inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">  <sup>3&ndash;5</sup>  </inter-ref> Both OPAT and COpAT require a multidisciplinary team, and can help Infectious Disease physicians with administrative tasks.<inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">  <sup>6 7</sup>  </inter-ref> Transition-of-care (TOC) services may alleviate some of this burden.<inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">  <sup>8</sup>  </inter-ref>  </p><p>At Stanford Medical Center, patients discharged on antibiotics after musculoskeletal infections faced an average wait of 20.1 days for follow-up with no structured monitoring for adherence or adverse events. 30-day readmission and emergency room visit rates were 15.0% and 10.0%, respectively. To improve post-discharge care, a pilot COpAT program incorporating Advanced Practice Providers (APPs) was launched.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The COpAT program was implemented on 1 March 2024. Patients were enrolled at hospital discharge and scheduled for TOC visits with the APP within two weeks, followed by physician visits in the musculoskeletal infectious diseases (MSK-ID) clinic. The COpAT team included an ID physician, APP, nurse, medical assistant, and TOC pharmacists. The APP conducted TOC visits, monitored adherence, reviewed labs, counselled patients, coordinated with home health agencies, and referred patients to the ER as needed. Data from September 1st 2023, to July 31, 2024, was analysed to assess the program&rsquo;s impact. Primary outcomes included the proportion of patients seen by an APP or physician within two weeks of discharge and 30-day hospital readmissions or ER visits.</p><p>Data from September 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024, were analyzed to assess the program&rsquo;s impact. Primary outcomes included the proportion of patients seen within two weeks of discharge and 30-day readmissions or ER visits.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The pre-intervention group and post intervention group consisted of 100 patients and 135 patients respectively, with patient characteristics shown in <cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>. <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">Figure 1</cross-ref> shows that mean follow-up time decreased from 20.1 to 9.1 days (p&lt;0.001), and follow-up with any provider within two weeks increased from 42% to 83% (p&lt;0.001). Readmission rates decreased slightly (15.0% to 12.6%, p=0.59), while ER visits increased (10.0% to 15.5%, p=0.21), likely due to earlier APP referrals to the ER. Utilization of TOC pharmacy services increased from 8% to 42% (p&lt;0.001). <cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T2">Table 2</cross-ref> shows APP interventions leading to symptom review, antibiotic dose adjustments, and resolution of medication errors before physician visit.</p><p>Overall, patients with systemic infections face higher risks of readmission and adverse events post-discharge. A designated COpAT team and implementation of an APP led TOC visit can play a crucial role in optimizing patient follow up and address patient needs in a timely manner.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 146 Table 1</no><caption><p>Patient demographics</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Pre-intervention (n=100)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Post-intervention (n=135)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>p-value</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="4" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Age </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">64.5 (1.6) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">65.2 (1.3) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.74 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Male </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">60 (60) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">88 (65) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.42 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Race </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.85 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Hispanic </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">20 (20) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">35 (26) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Non-Hispanic White </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">56 (56) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">67 (50) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Non-Hispanic Black </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6 (6) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">8 (6) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Non-Hispanic Asian </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10 (10) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">13 (10) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Other/Unknown </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">8 (8) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">12 (9) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Infection type </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Prosthetic joint infection </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">39 (39) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">40 (30) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.13 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Hardware associated infection </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10 (10) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">15 (11) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.79 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Spondylodiscitis </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">15 (15) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">16 (12) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.48 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Native osteomyelitis and septic joint </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">24 (24) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">28 (21) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.55 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Decubitus ulcer osteomyelitis </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1 (1) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4 (3) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.3 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Diabetic foot osteomyelitis </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10 (10) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">27 (27) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.04 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Other </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3 (3) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6 (4) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.57 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Discharge antibiotic </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Oral beta lactam </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">35 (35) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">36 (27) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.17 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">IV beta lactam </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">26 (26) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">29 (21) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.41 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Vancomycin </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">14 (14) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">16 (12) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.63 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7 (7) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">21 (16) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.05 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Doxycycline </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">26 (26) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">33 (24) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.79 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Fluoroquinolones </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">15 (15) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">25 (19) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.48 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Antifungals </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2 (2) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4 (3) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.64 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Daptomycin </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3 (3) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4 (3) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.99 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Rifampin </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7 (7) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9 (7) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.92 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Other </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3 (3) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7 (5) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.41 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Oral antibiotics only </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">62 (62) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">92 (68) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.33 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Length of stay </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9.2 (0.7) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9.6 (0.7) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.74 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Discharge destination </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Home </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">57 (57) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">80 (59) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Facility </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">43 (43) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">55 (41) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 146 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Wait time until first clinic appointment</p></caption><link locator="146_F1"></fig></p><p><tbl id="T2" loc="float"><no>Abstract 146 Table 2</no><caption><p>Interventions made by APP</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Types of intervention*</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Post cohort, n=135</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Ordering missing labs </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">21 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Lab abnormalities addressed </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Adverse event leading to modification in therapy </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">12 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Medication counselling </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">8 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Medication error addressed </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Sent to Emergency Room </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Prescription for symptoms </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Notified surgery for orthopaedic issue </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Other** </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4 </c></r></tblbdy><tblfn><p>* These interventions are not mutually exclusive. In some instances multiple interventions were performed during the same encounter.</p></tblfn><tblfn><p>**Other: placing antibiotic continuation order, ordering EKG, ordering PICC line care, ordering interventional radiology referral for central line removal</p></tblfn></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p><inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">1. Kind AC. Intravenous antibiotic therapy at home. <I>Arch Intern Med.</I>  </inter-ref> 1979;<inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">  <b>139</b>:413.</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p><inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">2. MacKenzie M, Rae N, Nathwani D. Outcomes from global adult outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy programmes: a review of the last decade. <I>Int J Antimicrob Agents.</I> 2014;<b>43</b>:7&ndash;16.</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p><inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">3. Seaton RA, <I>et al.</I> From &lsquo;OPAT&rsquo; to &lsquo;COpAT&rsquo;: implications of the OVIVA study for ambulatory management of bone and joint infection. <I>J Antimicrob Chemother.</I>  </inter-ref> 2019;<inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">  <b>74</b>:2119&ndash;2121.</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p><inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">4. Iversen K, <I>et al.</I> Partial oral versus intravenous antibiotic treatment of endocarditis. <I>N Engl J Med.</I>  </inter-ref> 2019;<inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">  <b>380</b>:415&ndash;424.</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p><inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">5. Pertzborn M, Rivera CG, Tai DBG. Taking the route less traveled: on the way to COpAT. <I>Ther Adv Infect Dis.</I>  </inter-ref> 2023;<inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">  <b>10</b>:20499361231192771.</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p><inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">6. Norris AH, <I>et al.</I> 2018 Infectious diseases society of America clinical practice guideline for the management of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapya. <I>Clin Infect Dis.</I>  </inter-ref> 2019;<inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">  <b>68</b>:e1&ndash;e35.</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p><inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">7. Wolie ZT, Roberts JA, Gilchrist M, McCarthy K, Sime FB. Current practices and challenges of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: a narrative review. <I>J Antimicrob Chemother.</I>  </inter-ref> 2024;<inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">  <b>79</b>:2083&ndash;2102.</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p><inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">8. Palms DL, Jacob JT. Close patient follow-up among patients receiving outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy. <I>Clin Infect Dis.</I>  </inter-ref> 2020;<inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">  <b>70</b>:67&ndash;74.</inter-ref>  </p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thottacherry, E., Hawkins, M., Nedi, J., Turley, S., Facelo, P., Pierce, T., Fang, N., Furukawa, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.146</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.146</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[146 Can implementation of a complex outpatient antimicrobial therapy program reduce readmissions for patients with bone and joint infections?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A108</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A109</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A110-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[147 Analysis of coping strategies employed by nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic crisis by career paths]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A110-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Before the pandemic, nurses worldwide faced difficult working conditions, including staff shortages, heavy workloads, and traumatic experiences.<sup>1 2</sup> These factors contributed to overwork and chronic fatigue, negatively impacting both the quality of care provided and the health of caregivers.<sup>3</sup> Studies conducted before COVID-19 revealed that nurses felt inadequately prepared and lacked the confidence to handle crises.<sup>4</sup> The COVID-19 crisis intensified these issues, exposing structural and psychological vulnerabilities.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>This study aims to identify the coping strategies nurses employed during the COVID-19 health crisis, analyze their effects on professional trajectories, and propose mechanisms that healthcare institutions can utilize to support nurses&rsquo; adaptation in times of health emergencies.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>As part of a mixed-methods study on nurses&rsquo; career paths, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 74 nurses categorized into five career trajectories.<sup>5 6</sup> Two research assistants conducted each interview (~1.5 hours). We employed journey mapping methodology and analyzed data using a framework approach, integrating inductive and deductive methods.<sup>7 8</sup> Lazarus and Folkman&rsquo;s Transactional Model of Stress and Coping guided our analysis.<sup>9&ndash;11</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Sanitary measures shaped available coping strategies, underscoring the value of proactive approaches. Nurses who used problem-solving methods (planning, seeking support, adapting) managed stress more effectively than those relying on avoidance (consumption, denial, disengagement). High-risk area nurses reported elevated stress, while those who shifted roles fared better. Many underutilized employer-provided support resources. Some strategies facilitated crisis management but also introduced new challenges.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Understanding the coping strategies nurses use during the pandemic provides critical insights for strengthening resilience and improving retention. Healthcare institutions must adapt support mechanisms to foster long-term well-being and workforce stability.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Hegney DG, Craigie M, Hemsworth D, <I>et al</I>. Compassion satisfaction, compassion fatigue, anxiety, depression and stress in registered nurses in Australia: study 1 results. <I>J Nurs Manag.</I> May 2014;<b>22</b>(4):506&ndash;518.</p></li><li><p>Khamisa N, Peltzer K, Oldenburg B. Burnout in relation to specific contributing factors and health outcomes among nurses: a systematic review. <I>Int J Environ Res Public Health.</I> May 31 2013;<b>10</b>(6):2214&ndash;2240.</p></li><li><p>Alderson M, Parent-Rocheleau X, Mishara B. Critical review on suicide among nurses. <I>Crisis.</I> Jun 2015;<b>36</b>(2):91&ndash;101.</p></li><li><p>Labrague LJ, Hammad K, Gloe DS, <I>et al</I>. Disaster preparedness among nurses: a systematic review of literature. <I>Int Nurs Rev.</I> Mar 2018;<b>65</b>(1):41&ndash;53.</p></li><li><p>Fortin M-F, Gagnon J. Fondements et &eacute;tapes du processus de recherche: m&eacute;thodes quantitatives et qualitatives. <I>Montr&eacute;al: Cheneli&egrave;re &eacute;ducation</I> 2016.</p></li><li><p>Gallagher F, Marceau M. La recherche descriptive interpr&eacute;tative. In: Corbi&egrave;re M, Larivi&egrave;re N, eds. <I>M&eacute;thodes qualitatives, quantitatives et mixtes: dans la recherche en sciences humaines, sociales et de la sant&eacute;.</I> Vol 2e ed: Presses de l&rsquo;Universit&eacute; du Qu&eacute;bec; 2020:5&ndash;32.</p></li><li><p>Davies EL, Bulto LN, Walsh A, <I>et al</I>. Reporting and conducting patient journey mapping research in healthcare: a scoping review. <I>J Adv Nurs.</I> Jan 2023;<b>79</b>(1):83&ndash;100.</p></li><li><p>Miles MB, Huberman AM, Salda&ntilde;a J. <I>Qualitative data analysis : a methods sourcebook</I>. Fourth edition ed. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2020.</p></li><li><p>Lazarus R, Folkman S. <I>Stress, Appraisal, and Coping</I>. New York: Springer; 1984.</p></li><li><p>Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. <I>European Journal of Personality</I> 1987;<b>1</b>(3):141&ndash;169.</p></li><li><p>Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK. Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. <I>J Pers Soc Psychol.</I> Feb 1989;<b>56</b>(2):267&ndash;283.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cloe, B., Christian, R., Vaillancourt Vanessa, T., Catherine, D., Tardif Alexe, D., Anae&#x0308;lle, M., Marie-Eve, P., Veronique, L., Marie-Eve, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.147</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.147</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[147 Analysis of coping strategies employed by nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic crisis by career paths]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A110</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A110</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A110-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[148 Improving medical education participation: tailoring postgraduate education for doctors]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A110-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>This project aimed to investigate the declining attendance of doctors in postgraduate teaching within the Southern Health and Social Care Trust (SHSCT), identify barriers to participation and develop effective strategies to improve engagement and attendance rates.</p><p>Continued medical education helps maintain high clinical standards and improve shared decision-making skills.<sup>1</sup> but low attendance has become a significant barrier to effective professional development. Previous studies<sup>1&ndash;3</sup> highlight that barriers such as workload, time constraints, and perceived session irrelevance contribute to low engagement. The project was conducted by the Medical Education Department in line with broader efforts to support doctors with continuous professional development</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We employed a mixed-methods approach, combining attendance record analysis with qualitative survey data from doctors across all grades and specialties. A survey was conducted which explored factors such as workload, timing of teaching sessions, perceptions of content, and its relevance to clinical practice.</p><p>Survey feedback from doctors identified key barriers. To engage relevant staff, we held regular meetings with faculty and collaborated with the Quality Improvement (QI) team to assess challenges and guide intervention strategies.</p><p>Findings were disseminated to relevant stakeholders to raise awareness and foster a shared understanding of the challenges.</p></sec><sec><st>Results/Discussion</st><p>The majority of doctors who participated in this survey were senior-grade clinicians, playing a crucial role in patient management and outcomes. Identified barriers included clinical workload (90%), time clashes (60%), and topic relevance. This supports findings from a study that had underscored the need for leadership support in addressing staffing issues, workload pressure and creating a protected time for learning.<sup>2 4</sup>  </p><p>Doctors suggested that reducing workload, providing protected time, recording sessions, scheduling on preferred days, using varied delivery methods, and tailoring topics could enhance engagement.<sup>4&ndash;7</sup> A well-supported structured teaching program can foster an environment that helps trainees deliver patient-centered care.<sup>4 7</sup> While the quantitative impact on attendance is still being evaluated, qualitative feedback and improved attendance rates suggest that strategies such as protected time on preferred days, the use of visually engaging graphics to enhance communication and varied teaching methods (hybrid format, workshops) are beneficial in addressing engagement challenges.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p><inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">Yang H, Chen S, Zhao N, Zhou X, Cui L, Xia W, <I>et al</I>. Effects of online continuing medical education on perspectives of shared decision-making among Chinese endocrinologists. <I>BMC Med Educ</I>. 2023 Nov 17;<b>23</b>(1):878.</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p><inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">O&rsquo;Doherty D, Dromey M, Lougheed J, Hannigan A, Last J, McGrath D. Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education &ndash; an integrative review. <I>BMC Med Educ</I>. 2018 Jun 7;<b>18</b>:130.</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p><inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">Jedaar Z, Marrin, Ceri, Pugsley L. How to ...: overcome barriers to effective workbased learning. <I>Educ Prim Care</I>. 2009 Jan 1;<b>20</b>(6):477&ndash;9.</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p><inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">Patel V, Buchanan H, Hui M, Patel P, Gupta P, Kinder A, <I>et al</I>. How do specialist trainee doctors acquire skills to practice patient-centred care? A qualitative exploration. 2018;e022054.</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p><inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">Maatouk-Bu&#x0308;rmann B, Ringel N, Spang J, Weiss C, Mo&#x0308;ltner A, Riemann U, <I>et al</I>. Improving patient-centered communication: results of a randomized controlled trial. <I>Patient Educ Couns</I>. 2016 Jan 1;<b>99</b>(1):117&ndash;24.</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p><inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">Jenkins B, Lester ,Katrina, Noble ,Alex, Such ,Helen, Yawn ,Barbara, and Scott A. Evaluating the impact of continuing medical education in the interdisciplinary team: a novel, targeted approach. <I>J CME</I>. 2023 Dec 31;<b>12</b>(1):2161730.</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p><inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">Belay HT, Ruairc B&Oacute;, Gu&eacute;randel A. Workshops: an important element in medical education. <I>BJPsych Adv</I>. 2019 Jan;<b>25</b>(1):7&ndash;13.</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p><inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">Continuing professional development - guidance with the requirements for revalidation - GMC. [cited 2025 Mar 21]. Available from: https://www.gmc-uk.org/education/standards-guidance-and-curricula/guidance/continuing-professional-development</inter-ref>  </p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ucheoma, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.148</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.148</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[148 Improving medical education participation: tailoring postgraduate education for doctors]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A110</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A111</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A112-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[150 Building resilience in healthcare: a holistic business continuity strategy for ensuring patient safety at a large general multicampus hospital in Belgium]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A112-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Ensuring patient safety in hospitals requires a robust and adaptive business continuity strategy. AZ Delta acknowledges the challenges arising from limited preparedness for large-scale system failures (e.g., utility disruptions or IT downtime) and is committed to addressing these risks to care continuity, particularly in critical departments where uninterrupted system functionality is vital, and achieving full preparedness. Without an integrated continuity strategy, responses tend to be reactive, leading to delays in care, heightened stress, and increased risks to patient safety. The main goal of this initiative is to establish a structured, collaborative framework for business continuity planning within the hospital, enhancing resilience by identifying critical vulnerabilities and evaluating strategies to mitigate operational disruptions.</p><p>The focus is on the clinical and operational departments, which depend on complex, interdependent systems, such as power supply, medical gas systems, clinical monitoring, and electronic health records. These systems are vital for maintaining patient safety and uninterrupted care. The project team consists of a multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals, including department managers, IT and technical support staff, pharmacists, and other key stakeholders. The primary affected group includes patients and the broader community that depends on the hospital during crises.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A step-by-step approach was used to develop a tailored business continuity plan for AZ Delta, adopting a hospital-wide and integrated perspective. Critical functions essential to primary care and services were first mapped and categorized into six vulnerability areas, with further details provided in collaboration with process owners. A business impact analysis (BIA) prioritized these functions and linked them to minimum service levels. Control measures were assessed using a color-coded system, classified into preventive, response, and recovery actions. Dependencies between processes, personnel, and suppliers were analysed to establish mitigation strategies. Training requirements were documented, ensuring staff preparedness for potential disruptions. This analysis will be periodically repeated to keep the business continuity plan (BCP) up-to-date and responsive to emerging risks.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The main result is the successful development of a comprehensive BCP for AZ Delta, which categorizes critical functions across six key areas: staff, supplies, telecommunication and data, utility services, equipment, and building infrastructure. The BCP includes tailored preventive, response, and recovery measures to ensure continuity of care during potential disruptions. Approximately 2000 healthcare professionals have participated in large-scale simulation exercises, addressing failures in medical gas supply, electricity, telecommunication, and the electronic health record system. These exercises tested participants&rsquo; ability to maintain patient care despite these disruptions. The BCP will be continuously updated and integrated into the hospital&rsquo;s internal audit system, with findings incorporated into annual departmental planning and training initiatives to maintain high preparedness levels.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>This initiative has established a structured, collaborative framework for business continuity planning within a hospital environment. By implementing a proactive approach, AZ Delta has significantly improved its preparedness for system failures, ensuring patient safety and operational resilience. A key challenge encountered during this process was differentiating between emergency planning and business continuity management due to overlapping functions. Continuous stakeholder engagement remains crucial for long-term success. The key lesson learned is the importance of early stakeholder involvement and clear communication to foster a culture of preparedness. This approach serves as a model for other healthcare institutions aiming to enhance resilience and ensure continuous, high-quality patient care in the face of unforeseen disruptions.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Devos, E., Goossens, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.150</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.150</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[150 Building resilience in healthcare: a holistic business continuity strategy for ensuring patient safety at a large general multicampus hospital in Belgium]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A112</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A112</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A112-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[151 The speech and language therapy led ENT parallel clinic- a transformational pathway]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A112-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Speech and Language Therapists (SLTs) specialising in the area of Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) work with voice and upper airway conditions. These can be of organic or functional aetiology. Historically, patients had to wait years to see an ENT doctor and several months more to see a specialist SLT in Voice &amp; Upper airway. Many of these patients do not need to see an ENT Consultant directly. Instead, they can be seen by an Advanced Practitioner Specialist SLT with specialised knowledge and skills in the assessment and management of voice and upper airway conditions.</p><p>The SLT can investigate, make advanced clinical decisions, conduct endoscopic evaluation of the larynx, provide advice, exercises and techniques to manage the condition, and make referrals to other services as required, in an SLT Led ENT Parallel clinic service.<sup>1</sup> The South Eastern Health and Social Care Trust SLT Voice &amp; Throat service in collaboration with the ENT service, developed the first SLT Led ENT Parallel clinic in Northern Ireland. The SLT sees the patient in place of the doctor, carries out laryngoscopy and manages the voice/upper airway condition with excellent outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Patients were asked about development of the service, and the service was benchmarked against similar service in GB. Discussions were carried out with stakeholders and protocols established. Training of staff to advanced practitioner level for nasendoscopy was completed with ENT colleagues. Data was collated regarding the number of patients seen, number of clinics carried out and types of conditions presenting in clinic. Further information was gathered regarding whether the patient needed to be seen by the ENT consultant or attend for follow up SLT input following their attendance in the clinic. For those patients who attended for further SLT follow up, data was gathered regarding wait time, and length of stay in service. A patient involvement questionnaire and QR code feedback helped to develop the service at each stage. New staff were employed and trained, and new equipment was purchased to improve service quality and patient flow. As a result, protocols were adapted and the service developed to run 2 extended clinics per week for routine and urgent patients. Ongoing review and analysis of data is conducted for future development of the service model, promoting use of the model in other health trusts in the region.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Historically, patients had to wait years to see an ENT doctor and several months more to see a specialist SLT in Voice &amp; Upper airway in our NHS health trust. Now, patients can be triaged to see the Advanced Practitioner SLT in place of the doctor, receiving assessment, and timely, efficient advice. Wait time has been reduced by 70 weeks for urgent patients and 7 years for routine patients. The SLT as first contact provides the patient with a more detailed vocal assessment and accurate specialist advice, exercises and strategies, reducing the need for follow up in the SLT core Voice &amp;Throat service by almost 80%. Those patients requiring follow up therapy in our core Voice and Throat service need 60% less therapy sessions starting recovery from assessment point, and improving patient flow, with 96% not needing to see an ENT doctor. We have seen over 1500 patients, and given back 150 clinics to ENT doctors to see more complex patients requiring surgery or cancer care. This service maximises clinical strengths of clinicians across 2 directorates and utilises the benefits and safe governance of integrated holistic multidisciplinary care.</p><p>We are targeting workforce planning,<sup>2</sup> and developing SLT clinical skills to a highly specialist advanced practitioner level to work in this service. Highlighted as a priority in a Department of Health report,<sup>3</sup> this service model has now been rolled out in another trust in Northern Ireland, and is transferable within the UK and other countries. Scale up and spread of this clinical model is a future goal.</p><p>It is sustainable by reducing carbon footprint, with less hospital visits, less energy expenditure and is cost efficient. The SLT Led ENT Parallel clinic is improving patient care and is 57% cheaper to run.</p><p>At a time of extreme challenges in the National Health Service in Northern Ireland, this service is an example of an efficient, safe and well governed solution by allied health professionals in advanced practice.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Jones SM <I>et al</I>. Speech and language therapy endoscopic evaluation of the larynx for clinical voice disorders. London: Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists, position paper, 2020.</p></li><li><p>Advanced AHP practice framework, Guidance for Supporting Advanced Allied Health Professions Practice in Health and Social Care, Department of Health Northern Ireland, 2019.</p></li><li><p>Elective care framework Restart, Recovery and Design, Department of Health Northern Ireland 2021, 2024.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greer, C., Connolly, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.151</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.151</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[151 The speech and language therapy led ENT parallel clinic- a transformational pathway]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A112</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A113</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A113-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[152 'Improving improvement - or, librarians are for improvement, not just for reference]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A113-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><p>We acknowledge that we have seen and agree to the licence applied to conference abstracts published by BMJ.</p></sec><sec><st>Introduction</st><p>There are a number of challenges faced by NHS staff when trying to embed evidence of all kinds into improvement in healthcare. This can apply whether improvements are sought through formal Quality Improvement (QI) methodologies, as part of strategic service planning, or updates to policy.</p><p>Often, people perceive library and knowledge specialists as being primarily for students, doctors, or clinical queries. In turn, librarians may perceive ourselves as &lsquo;background characters&rsquo;.</p><p>Bridging the gap between the process of running a QI project and applying its findings is sometimes difficult, and not always considered.</p><p>The evidence may be brought into QI practice late in the process, if at all: this means that practitioners may miss out on valuable insights from patient involvement, co-production, and other pilot projects, as well as published sources.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A knowledge audit tool is currently in test phase with Somerset teams, aiming to establish knowledge opportunities and to strengthen sharing within and between teams- how do you know what you don&rsquo;t know?</p><p>Hampshire and Isle of Wight&rsquo;s Knowledge Specialist has been involved in the development of the organisation&rsquo;s digital strategy alongside high-level colleagues in systems, data warehousing, business intelligence and clinical information. They also worked with the business intelligence project lead to develop their user testing groups for a new self-service access portal.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In the financial year 2023&ndash;4, Somerset&rsquo;s Knowledge Specialist saved 262.5 hours (or 35 working days) of staff time; in Hampshire and Isle of Wight, they ran 53 searches, of which 23 were on QI-type topics, and saved 320 hours (or 42 working days) of staff time. 75 Hampshire and Isle of Wight preceptees received library training before undertaking their quality improvement projects.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Flett, K., Pawley, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.152</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.152</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[152 'Improving improvement - or, librarians are for improvement, not just for reference]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A113</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A113</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A113-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[153 High-risk medicine monitoring in primary care - creation of a drug safety dashboard]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A113-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Over one billion prescription items are dispensed in the community in England each year.<sup>1</sup> The General Medical Council report <I>Investigating the prevalence and causes of prescribing errors in general practice</I> found that 1 in 20 prescriptions contained an error in terms of medication or monitoring.<sup>2</sup> Having a systematic audited procedure in place that identifies all patients prescribed drugs needing monitoring and ensuring testing as recommended enables prescribers to be confident when issuing prescriptions for high-risk medicines.<sup>3</sup>  </p><p>Our practice had many high-risk medicine safety searches available within the electronic healthcare record system (EMIS Web), however the searches were not reviewed regularly by the practice and there were no repercussions for the patients who despite multiple invitations had not undergone the required monitoring. Our project sought to develop a strategy for medication safety to ensure patients prescribed high-risk medicines are subject to more robust monitoring, therefore improving safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Medicine safety searches across four initial categories were identified: disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, direct oral anticoagulants, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) Alerts, and other high-risk medicines.</p><p>We created a digital Drug Safety Dashboard to track our progress each month. A traffic light system denoted if patients in a search were still to be reviewed (red), partially reviewed (amber) or fully reviewed (green). Searches were assigned to members of the Pharmacy and Prescribing Teams with protected time allocated to complete the patient reviews.</p><p>In parallel, the prescribing protocol was updated stipulating that should a patient not engage in monitoring, despite being invited twice, then that medication should be removed from their repeat prescription and the quantity halved. On completion of monitoring, the medication would be re-instated to their repeat prescription.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>30 safety searches across four categories were initially included within the Drug Safety Dashboard. We efficiently incorporated additional searches into the dashboard, for example when new MHRA Alerts were released, or guidelines updated, and we now have almost 100 safety searches across nine categories. The percentage of searches reviewed each month is tracked, with an 85% target completion rate.</p><p>A run chart was used to track our progress of the safety search where we were performing worst - in October 2022 there were 487 patients prescribed an ACE Inhibitor or Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker who had not had their renal function monitored within the previous 18 months, by April 2023 this had reduced to 48 patients.</p><p>We have also reduced the buffer zone for patients to complete their monitoring across many of the safety searches. At first, our safety search for patients prescribed an ACE Inhibitor or Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker identified those who had not had their renal function monitored within the previous 18 months, this has now been reduced to 14 months.</p><p>We now have a sustainable system that allows us to feel confident that high-risk medicines are being monitored and prescribed safely.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>NHS Business Services Authority, 2024. Prescription Cost Analysis &ndash; England 2023/24. Available from: https://www.nhsbsa.nhs.uk/statistical-collections/prescription-cost-analysis-england/prescription-cost-analysis-england-202324</p></li><li><p>General Medical Council, 2018. Investigating the prevalence and causes of prescribing errors in general practice. Accessed on 23rd March 2025 at: https://www.gmc-uk.org/about/what-we-do-and-why/data-and-research/research-and-insight-archive/investigating-the-prevalence-and-causes-of-prescribing-errors-in-general-practice</p></li><li><p>Wood S. Safer prescribing and monitoring of high-risk medicines. <I>Prescriber</I> 2020 Apr;<b>31</b>(4):10&ndash;5. doi:10.1002/psb.1834</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Choudhury, J., King, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.153</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.153</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[153 High-risk medicine monitoring in primary care - creation of a drug safety dashboard]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A113</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A114</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A114-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[154 Identification of undiagnosed heart failure at COPD annual reviews: a one-year follow-up]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A114-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Heart failure (HF) affects up to 40% of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)<sup>1</sup> and nearly doubles mortality in this patient group.<sup>2</sup> This highlights the importance of early identification. However, in UK primary care, HF assessment is not routinely prioritised during COPD annual reviews with studies indicating twelve months delayed treatment of HF in COPD patients compared to those without COPD.<sup>3</sup>Hamad et al. (2024) demonstrated the effectiveness of integrating HF assessment into COPD reviews using NT-proBNP testing and symptom-based assessment which resulted in identifying HF in 11% (n=26) of COPD patients.<sup>4</sup> This follow-up study evaluates the impact of this intervention after one-year.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Quantitative data analysed from the records of the COPD patients with new HF diagnosis (n=3) included frequency of exacerbation, hospital admissions, and antibiotic and steroid prescriptions. Patient-reported outcomes were measured using the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score. Thematic analysis was applied to patients&rsquo; feedback collected through scoping discussions.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Over one year following HF diagnosis and treatment; exacerbations decreased by 75% (n=4), steroid prescriptions were eliminated, antibiotic prescriptions decreased by 25% (n=4), and hospital admissions declined by 67% (n=3). There was no notable change in MRC or CAT scores. Thematic analysis identified three key themes: the importance of health literacy, approval of integrating HF assessment into COPD reviews, and acceptance of additional HF medication.</p></sec><sec><st>Discussion</st><p>Clinical impact and patient prospective highlights the feasibility and effectiveness of integrating HF assessment in COPD annual reviews. Patient-reported outcomes were not conclusive due to small sample size; however, patients&rsquo; feedback indicates approval of the intervention. With the absence of UK-specific literature and guidance on COPD-related cardiopulmonary risk management,<sup>5</sup> this pilot study represents a step in the right direction and recommends larger-scale studies to enhance validity.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Pirina P, Martinetti M, Spada C, Zinellu E, Pes R, Chessa E, Fois AG, Miravitlles M, Pais A, Cosseddu S, Dess&igrave; MA. Prevalence and management of COPD and heart failure comorbidity in the general practitioner setting. <I>Respiratory Medicine</I> 2017 Oct 1;<b>131</b>:1&ndash;5.</p></li><li><p>Ellingsen J, Johansson G, Larsson K, Lisspers K, Malinovschi A, Sta&#x0308;llberg B, Thuresson M, Janson C. Impact of comorbidities and commonly used drugs on mortality in COPD-real-world data from a primary care setting.<I> International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease</I> 2020 Feb 3;235&ndash;45.</p></li><li><p>Hayhoe B, Kim D, Aylin PP, Majeed FA, Cowie MR, Bottle A. Adherence to guidelines in management of symptoms suggestive of heart failure in primary care. <I>Heart</I> 2019 May 1;<b>105</b>(9):678&ndash;85.</p></li><li><p>Hamad H, Maroof SJ, Steward C. A quality improvement model to identify undiagnosed heart failure at chronic obstructive pulmonary disease annual reviews. <I>Int J Pharm Pract</I>. 2024;<b>32</b>(Suppl 2):ii71.</p></li><li><p>Shrikrishna D, Bostock B, Dickinson S, Piwko A, Ramalingam S, Saggu R, Steer J, Stonham C, Storey RF, Taylor CJ, Thakkar R. Absence of a UK consensus on the concept and management of cardiopulmonary risk in patients with COPD: results of a systematic review.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamad, H., Maroof, S., Steward, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.154</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.154</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[154 Identification of undiagnosed heart failure at COPD annual reviews: a one-year follow-up]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A114</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A114</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A114-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[155 Inclusion health patients in the emergency department: reducing the proportion who leave prematurely]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A114-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Inclusion Health attempts to address the health care needs of those socially excluded, who experience the extremes of health inequalities. People experiencing homelessness (PEH) have significantly lower life expectancies. The standardised mortality rates are estimated up to ten times greater than those the same age in the general population in Dublin.<sup>1</sup> They are frequent users of emergency departments (EDs) but they are more likely to leave without appropriate treatment.<sup>2</sup> A study published in 2017 showed that 40.7% of PEH left ED without appropriate treatment compared to 15.5% of those housed.<sup>3</sup> The aim of this study was to reduce the proportion of PEH leaving ED before treatment completion (LBTC) in St James&rsquo;s Hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Quality improvement and co-production methodology were used in collaboration with service users (PEH) and service providers (Emergency medicine staff) in</p><p>St James&rsquo;s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. A number of complex issues were identified from both service users and providers. A poster was developed for staff to help support inclusion patients in ED and case management collaboration was initiated on the management of recurrent attendees.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>During the study time period, there was no change in the proportion of PEH leaving ED before treatment completion (33.3% in November 2022 compared to 34.9% in August 2023). Twelve frequent attendees were identified who represented almost 40% of all LBTC presentations (accounting for 132 presentations out of 338 between January -May 2023). Case management approaches were initiated with these patients in collaboration with the ED. With one exception, all had reduced numbers of LBTC episodes in the subsequent 3 months (total of 30 presentations between June - August 2023). The financial department of the hospital estimated the cost of an average ED presentation was 464.36, which resulted in a projected cost saving of 22,847 during June - August 2023.</p><p>Investing in case management was successful in reducing numbers in LBTC in a group of frequent ED attendees. More investment is needed in the case management approach and likely to be cost effective.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Aldridge RW, Story A, Hwang SW, Nordentoft M, Luchenski SA, Hartwell G,<I> et al</I>. Morbidity and mortality in homeless individuals, prisoners, sex workers, and individuals with substance use disorders in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. <I>Lancet</I> 2018 Jan 20;<b>391</b>(10117):241&ndash;50.</p></li><li><p>Smalley CM, Meldon SW, Simon EL, Muir MR, Delgado F, Fertel BS. Emergency department patients who leave before treatment is complete. <I>West J Emerg Med</I>. 2021 Feb 26;<b>22</b>(2):148&ndash;55.</p></li><li><p>N&iacute; Cheallaigh C, Cullivan S, Sears J, Lawlee AM, Browne J, Kieran J, <I>et al</I>. Usage of unscheduled hospital care by homeless individuals in Dublin, Ireland: a cross-sectional study. <I>BMJ Open</I> 2017 Dec 1;<b>7</b>(11):e016420.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murphy, M., Lawlee, A., Cheallaigh, C. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.155</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.155</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[155 Inclusion health patients in the emergency department: reducing the proportion who leave prematurely]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A114</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A115</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A116-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[157 From reporting to learning: transforming incident management in a general hospital]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A116-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Electronic incident reporting systems have been utilized in hospitals for many years now. During this time, hospitals have worked hard to improve the safety culture to a culture were practitioners feel safe to report and discuss safety incidents.</p><p>And while reporting systems as a whole are perceived as valuable, it is remains difficult to ensure incident reports and the analysis of events are effectively leading to knowledge increase and preventing recurrence of events.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A quality improvement project was designed within the hospital with the following goals:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Provide system improvements within the electronic reporting system to improve workflow for all users</p></li><li><p>Introduce a new way to categorize incidents based on severity and scope</p></li><li><p>Implement new standards for the analysis of reported , based on the severity of the event</p></li></l></p><p>To monitor the effects of the changes made, 2 quality indicator were measured before, during and after implementation:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Changes in the number of events reported</p></li><li><p>Monitoring of the processing time of reported events and monitoring of the percentage of events fully analyzed within 30 days.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>After implementation, an increase in the average number of reports per quarter has been observed (Q2 2023: 310 events reported vs. 384 in Q2 2024), as well as an increase in the percentage of events that were fully handled and analyzed within 30 days of the report being made (45.5% in 2023 to 73.9% in Q2 of 2024.). This indicates that overall, more analyses were conducted and completed, providing more in-depth learning opportunities for care teams.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sutter, K. D., Loubele, S., Janssens, I., Thomeer, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.157</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.157</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[157 From reporting to learning: transforming incident management in a general hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A116</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A116</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A116-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[158 A successful multidisciplinary quality improvement project in improving management of paracetamol overdose patients in a district general hospital in the UK using quality service improvement redesign principles]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A116-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) in the United Kingdom set the British standard of care for paracetamol overdose patients in 2008. These standards aim to uphold the best practice guidelines from the United Kingdom&rsquo;s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency.<sup>1 2</sup> Timely recognition, correct timing of blood sampling for paracetamol levels and biochemical tests e.g. liver function tests, international normalised ratio, and timely administration of the N-acetylcysteine (NAC) antidote where appropriate are the cornerstones of these standards and guidelines. The NAC antidote is traditionally given over 21 hours in three separate infusions of different time durations: 1 hour, 4 hours and 16 hours.</p><p>In 2021, RCEM issued a position statement to recommend the Scottish and Newcastle Acetylcysteine Protocol (SNAP) to be the UK default regimen for paracetamol overdose patients because its shorter 12-hour duration and simpler administration: two infusions &ndash; 1st infusion over 1 hours, 2nd infusion over 10 hours.<sup>3</sup> The Royal Derby Hospital (RDH) emergency department (ED) adopted SNAP in 2022.</p><p>RDH ED has continued with regular audits of the management of patients who taken a paracetamol overdose since the RCEM last published a national report in 2013. After adopting the use of SNAP in 2022, a local audit found a decrease in compliance in the percentage of patients with a single overdose receiving NAC in under the recommended 8 hours post ingestion of paracetamol. The aim of this quality improvement project was to increase compliance with the RCEM standards for managing paracetamol overdose patients with the goal of improving patient safety and their overall care.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>This quality improvement project recruited a multidisciplinary team that followed quality service improvement redesign (QSIR) principles.<sup>4</sup> This team conducted a survey of ED staff experiences in managing paracetamol overdose patients, planned change interventions and implemented these changes. These change interventions included: educational sessions, both face-to-face and custom-made short videos; quick reference laminated booklets summarising the MHRA guidelines for initial triage management of paracetamol overdose patients; and a custom-made sticker for speedier manual prescription of NAC. Plan, do, study, act cycles were conducted with each change intervention to analyse the effectiveness of these actions.</p><p>Data were collected and analysed to check for compliance with the standards set by RCEM, adverse events (such as anaphylactoid reactions and abnormal liver function tests) and system-level measures, including length of in-patient stay.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 214 patients were included. Compliance with the RCEM standard of 100% of patients presenting with a single overdose receiving NAC in under 8 hours from ingesting their overdose increased from 36% to 43%. No improvements were seen for the RCEM standard of 100% of patients who took a single overdose of more than 6 g or more than 75 mg/kg and presenting over 8 hours after ingestion to receive NAC within 1 hour of arrival. No improvement was seen for the RCEM standard of 100% of patients with staggered overdoses to receive NAC within 1 hour of arrival.</p><p>Median inpatient duration reduced from 35 hours to 30.5 hours. No significant changes were observed in adverse events. Special cause variation was noted in plasma level timing, suggesting early sampling in some cases.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>This QIP has improved compliance with the RCEM standard of having ideally 100% of patients presenting with a single overdose to receive NAC within 8 hours of ingestion of paracetamol and reduced inpatient stays while maintaining patient safety. No improvements were noted for the RCEM standards of 100% of patients who took a single overdose of more than 6 g or more than 75 mg/kg and presenting over 8 hours after ingestion to receive NAC within 1 hour of arrival and the standard of 100% of patients with staggered overdoses to receive NAC within 1 hour of arrival. The PDSA-based interventions were low cost, cost effective, easy to use by our nursing and clinician colleagues providing direct patient care, feasible and scalable. These interventions can be readily adopted in other emergency departments for similar low cost and user friendliness. Future efforts will focus on maintaining these improvements and improve compliance with the RCEM standards further.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>The College of Emergency Medicine Clinical Audits Clinical Audits Paracetamol Overdose Clinical Audit 2013&ndash;14 EXCELLENCE IN EMERGENCY MEDICINE National Report Paracetamol Overdose Clinical Audit 2013&ndash;14 National Report. Available from: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://rcem.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Paracetamol_Overdose_Clinical_Audit_2013_14.pdf</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>OXBASE&reg; Paracetamol. Edinburgh. NPIS. 2023 [updated 2023 March; cited 2023 Sept 17]. Available from: https://www.toxbase.org/poisons-index-a-z/p-products/paracetamol------------/</p></li><li><p>Royal College of Emergency Medicine. RCEM Position Statement Use of the SNAP Regime for the Treatment of Paracetamol Toxicity. 2021. Available from: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://rcem.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Use_of_SNAP_for_Treatment_of_Paracetamol_Toxicity_Nov_2021.pdf</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. The Handbook of Quality and Service Improvement Tools Institute for Innovation and Improvement. NHS ENGLAND. 2010 Mar. Available from: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.england.nhs.uk/commissioning/wp-content/uploads/sites/44/2017/11/the_handbook_of_quality_and_service_improvement_tools_2010-2.pdf</inter-ref>  </p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chung, C., Nsouli, D. E., Wilkins, H., Burton, F. W., Abdullah, Y., Solaiman, A., Sheikh, M., Davis, H., Johnson, G., Ebeidallah, G., Alqeisi, T., Sandhu, R., Maqsood, M., Bate-Jones, P., Reynolds, M., Riyaz, R., Jameel, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.158</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.158</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[158 A successful multidisciplinary quality improvement project in improving management of paracetamol overdose patients in a district general hospital in the UK using quality service improvement redesign principles]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A116</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A117</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A118-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[160 Patient participation in medication management during hospitalisation: empower to sustain]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A118-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The current medication process in Dutch hospital&rsquo;s is designed from a hospital&rsquo;s and legal perspective, with emphasis on effective logistics and legal responsibilities, rather than on empowering patients. Consequently the current medication process results in the following disadvantages:</p><p>1. Medication safety risks</p><p>2. Lack of patient involvement</p><p>3. Inefficient use of healthcare resources</p><p>4. Impediment of sustainable healthcare</p><p>Patient&lsquo;s Own Medication (POM) use and Self-Administration of Medication (SAM) are two strategies to ensure that patients are more involved in the medication process in the hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Loes van Herpen-Meeuwissen (hospital pharmacist at Radboudumc) has done research for her PhD on &lsquo;patient participation in medication management during hospitalisation&rsquo;. Her thesis examines two strategies that ensure that patients are more involved in the medication process in the hospital, these are POM use and SAM. With POM, patients bring their home medication into the hospital which is subsequently administered by nurses during hospitalization. When combined with SAM, capable patients self-manage their (home) medication regimen, including storage and administration, during hospitalisation.</p><p>The PhD research was conducted in several Dutch hospitals, of which university, teaching, general, and specialized hospitals. In these hospitals different hospital wards, surgical and medical were selected. There has also been research conducted outside the hospital setting among stakeholders and patients on their vision of SAM.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The four major benefits of POM and SAM are:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Enhancement of medication safety</p></li><li><p>Increase of patient participation</p></li><li><p>Efficient use of healthcare resources</p></li><li><p>Contribution of sustainable healthcare</p></li></l></p><p>After seeing the promising results from the before mentioned PhD from Loes van Herpen-Meeuwissen, Radboudumc will implement these adjustments in the medication process for suitable patient groups.</p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>van Herpen-Meeuwissen LJM, van den Bemt BJF, Derijks HJ, van den Bemt PMLA, de Vries F, Maat B, van Onzenoort HAW. Economic impact of patient&rsquo;s own medication use during hospitalisation: a multicentre pre-post implementation study. <I>Int J Clin Pharm</I>. 2019 Dec;<b>41</b>(6):1658&ndash;1665. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00932-1. Epub 2019 Nov 8. PMID: 31705458</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Herpen-Meeuwissen, L. v., Peters, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.160</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.160</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[160 Patient participation in medication management during hospitalisation: empower to sustain]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A118</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A118</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A118-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[161 Abstract requesting medical data: time to simplify!]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A118-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>At Radboud University Medical Center, each medical department historically had its own unique process for requesting medical data. These processes were plagued by inefficiencies, including:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Excessive time consumption, leading to delays in obtaining consent.</p></li><li><p>Long waiting times for patients.</p></li><li><p>Confusion among patients navigating different procedures across multiple departments.</p></li><li><p>Lack of transparency and monitoring capabilities.</p></li><li><p>A high risk of errors.</p></li></l></p><p>Recognizing the need for improvement, the hospital initiated a 5-year program to harmonize and standardize care processes across all medical departments. The aim was to establish a single, unified process&mdash;a need identified by healthcare managers, hospital lawyers, patients, and colleagues working on the front lines.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>To address these issues, a new, streamlined working method was implemented, featuring:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>A standardized procedure to align with broader care pathways.</p></li><li><p>A single, uniform form for patients aged 16 and older across all departments (phase 1).</p></li><li><p>Digitalization of the process, making it accessible through Epic and MyRadboud (the patient portal).</p></li></l></p><p>This approach was piloted in three departments (Urology, ENT, Neurology/Neurosurgery), accompanied by the following actions:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>  <b>Informational Updates:</b> Monthly progress reports for key stakeholders, including superusers, care managers, patient care secretaries, medical information officers, and via the Epic newsletter.</p></li><li><p>  <b>Kick-Off Meetings:</b> Team leaders and patient care secretaries were briefed on process details, given live demonstrations in Epic, and tasked with informing their colleagues and eliminating outdated practices.</p></li><li><p>  <b>Engagement Campaigns:</b> A two-week initiative using Zenya to share updates via mail, including knowledge flashes, videos, polls, and interactive discussions to familiarize teams with the new process.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Development Process</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Collection and consolidation of existing forms from all departments.</p></li><li><p>Reduction of forms into a single streamlined version, with feedback incorporated.</p></li><li><p>Collaboration with the patient advisory council and hospital lawyer to refine the form.</p></li><li><p>Textual testing of communication materials.</p></li><li><p>Integration of the form into Epic, with accompanying instructional materials.</p></li><li><p>Documentation of working agreements in Zenya, the hospital&rsquo;s quality portal.</p></li><li><p>Approval by the central committee to establish the new standard working method.</p></li></l></p><p>Measurement: the average time for obtaining consent was tracked before, during, and after the pilot phase. Epic also provided a transparent overview of digital forms sent by each department, enabling real-time monitoring. Patient feedback from the advisory council and pilot departments was actively sought to optimize the process.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The standardized process yielded significant improvements, including:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>A reduction in average time to receive consent from 10&ndash;14 days to 2&ndash;3 days, and in maximum time from 4 weeks to 2 weeks (with exceptions).</p></li><li><p>Enhanced efficiency in appointment scheduling, reducing unused appointments due to pending data.</p></li><li><p>A shift to digital platforms, with approximately 75% of patients utilizing MyRadboud. Over 75% of forms are now sent digitally, leading to substantial savings in postage and paper costs while promoting sustainability.</p></li><li><p>Reduced administrative workload for patient care secretaries, with clearer workflows and improved transparency through Epic and Zenya.</p></li><li><p>Improved patient experience, especially for those navigating multiple departments, as over half of all medical departments have fully implemented the new process.</p></li></l></p><p>The standardized, digitalized process is now transparent, manageable, and user-friendly&mdash;benefiting both patients and hospital staff alike.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dijkstra, M., Cruijsen, A. v. d., Roelofs, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.161</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.161</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[161 Abstract requesting medical data: time to simplify!]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A118</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A119</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A121-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[164 Monthly measurements of patient experiences in Danish public psychiatry]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A121-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>National questionnaire surveys of in- and outpatients at the Danish public psychiatric hospitals have been conducted since 2005. In 2022, a major change was implemented in the conduct of the survey. Approximately 40,000 adult psychiatric patients are invited annually to participate in the survey.</p><p>The purpose of the survey is to gain detailed, systematic information about patient-perceived quality in Danish Psychiatry (LUP Psychiatry). Previously, the survey was conducted by the staff distributing paper questionnaires to the patients each year in September and October.</p><p>In 2019 a new strategy for the survey was decided based on nine guidelines, which resulted in a new concept featuring monthly measurements for adult patients. The ambition of the new concept is to provide real-time monthly data on the quality experiences of the patient, without burdening the staff with data collection and minimizes the burden on patients. Hence the survey was made digital. The survey aims to be application-oriented, providing departments and administrators with a basis to work with quality development.</p><p>DEFACTUM in the Central Denmark Region is a department of research and consultancy that manages the project leadership of LUP Psychiatry and is responsible for the overall coordination and practical implementation on behalf of the five Danish regions.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>From 2019 to 2022, we worked on developing the survey with monthly measurements. A pilot study was conducted (from January to July 2021), the number of national questions was reduced, a catalogue of questions with national and local questions was prepared, and an agreement was made on and development of monthly random samples from The National Patient Register, along with ongoing involvement of staff and patients. The concept of the monthly measurements was implemented in October 2022. The concept is continuously being improved.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The poster will describe the changes in the survey from a paper questionnaire distributed by the staff to a monthly digital survey and how the survey is conducted. It will also provide examples of how the results are communicated to the clinic, as well as outlining the advantages and disadvantages of the survey. The advantages of the survey include that it provides quick and timely data to the clinic, while the staff/clinic does not need to spend time/resources on data collection. Additionally, it is a strength that the clinic can choose and continuously replace questions and propose the development of new questions for the survey. The disadvantage is that there is a bias in the representation of patients across diagnoses, age, gender and a low response rate.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dahl, G., Horlu&#x0308;ck, J. T., Witzel, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.164</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.164</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[164 Monthly measurements of patient experiences in Danish public psychiatry]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A121</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A121</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A121-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[165 How do we care for older LGBTQ+ people at risk of developing cognitive decline or dementia?]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A121-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>LGBTQ+ people are at higher risk than heterosexual people of cognitive decline and developing dementia and are more likely to experience; delayed access to statutory health and social care services, including Memory Services; earlier entry to long term care; having more and poorly managed long-term health conditions; premature cognitive decline and mortality, and inequitable access to &lsquo;good&rsquo; end-of-life care (Fredriksen-Goldsen <I>et al</I>., 2018; Lawrence, 2019; Correro &amp; Neilson, 2019; Di Lorito <I>et al</I>., 2021; Benbow <I>et al</I>., 2021; Bailey <I>et al</I>., 2022; Baril &amp; Silverman, 2022; May &amp; Harris, 2023; Candrian <I>et al</I>., 2023 &amp;amp Saunder <I>et al</I>., 2023).</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>Following a scoping review of the literature and feedback from other stakeholders a focus group event was held inviting people from the LGBTQ+ community with cognitive decline or dementia and their family carers.</p><p>Three pertinent questions were posed:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Can you share some of your experiences of health and social care services for dementia?</p></li><li><p>Do you feel you or members from the LGBTQ+ community have difficulties accessing health and social care services?</p></li><li><p>What changes would make it easier for the LGBTQ+ community to access health and social care services?</p></li></l></p><p>The qualitative information then underwent thematic analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Four main themes were identified:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Amplification of the impact of a long-term condition.</p></li><li><p>A lack of personalised care.</p></li><li><p>Feelings of being unwelcome and unsafe.</p></li><li><p>Failure of statutory health and social care services to meet people&rsquo;s needs of LGBTQ+ people with cognitive decline or dementia.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Bailey D, Calasanti T, Crowe A, Di Lorito C, Hogan P, and De Vries B. Equal but different! improving care for older LGBT+ adults<I>. Age and Ageing</I> 2022;<b>51:</b>1&ndash;7.</p></li><li><p>Baril A, and Silverman M. Forgotten lives: trans older adults living with dementia at the intersection of cisgenderism, ableism/cogniticism and ageism<I>. Sexualities</I> 2022;<b>25</b>(1&ndash;2):117&ndash;131.</p></li><li><p>Benbow SM, Eost-Telling C, Kingston P. A narrative review of literature on the use of health and social care by older trans adults: what can United Kingdom services learn?<I> Ageing and Society</I> 2021;<b>42:</b>2262&ndash;2283.</p></li><li><p>Candrian C, Burke ES, Kline D, Torke AM. Experiences of caregiving with alzheimer&rsquo;s disease in the LGBT community<I>. Biomedcentral (BMC) Geriatrics</I> 2023;<b>23</b>(293).</p></li><li><p>Correro AN, and Nielson KA. A review of minority stress as a risk factor for cognitive decline in lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) elders<I>. Journal of Gay Lesbian Mental Health</I> 2019;<b>24</b>(1):2&ndash;19. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2019.1644570</inter-ref> Retrieved from <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Di Lorito C, Bosco A, Peel E, Hinchliff S, Dening T, Calasanti T, De Vries B, Cutler N, Fredriksen-Goldsen KI, and Harwood HR. Are dementia services and support organisations meeting the needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) caregivers of LGBT people living with dementia? A scoping review of the literature<I>. Ageing and Mental Health</I> 2021;<b>26</b>(10):1912&ndash;1921</p></li><li><p>Fredriksen-Goldsen KI, Jen S, Bryan AEB, and Goldsen J. Cognitive impairment, alzheimer&rsquo;s disease, and other dementias in the lives of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) older adults and their caregivers: needs and competencies<I>. Journal of Applied Gerontology</I> 2018;<b>37</b>(5):545&ndash;569.</p></li><li><p>Lawrence C. Death: a social disadvantage? Supporting underrepresented groups in end-of-life care<I>. Woking and Sam-Beare Hospices.</I> (2019) Retrieved from <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332143393</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>May JT, and Harris ML. Health experiences of sexual and gender minority people living with dementia and their care partners: protocol for a scoping review<I>. Journal of Medical Internet Research</I> 2023;<b>12</b>:e44918. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.2196/44918</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Saunders CL, Berner A, Lund J, Mason AM, Oakes-Monger T, Roberts M, Smith J, and Duschinsky R. Demographic characteristics, long-term health conditions and healthcare experiences of 6333 trans and non-binary adults in England: nationally representative evidence from 2021 GP patient survey<I>. British Medical Journal Open</I> 2023;<b>13</b>.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lane, J. C., Lewis, S., Flood, C., Thomas, B., Bond, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.165</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.165</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[165 How do we care for older LGBTQ+ people at risk of developing cognitive decline or dementia?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A121</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A122</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A122-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[166 Improving the experience: reducing time to permanent haemodialysis access creation for end-stage kidney disease patients]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A122-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Singapore is currently 5th worldwide for incident end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and 2nd for incident ESKD due to diabetes mellitus, with one new patient initiating every 5 hours. More than 80% of patients in Singapore initiate haemodialysis via a tunnelled dialysis catheter (TDC)<sup>1</sup> rather than an arteriovenous fistula (AVF). This carries with it risks of catheter infection and dysfunction, the risk being highest in the first 90 days after initiation with associated mortality and morbidity. The median time from referral to AVF creation ranged from 5&ndash;43 days internationally.<sup>2</sup> However, in our centre it was 142 days, with only 3% of patients achieving creation in &lt;40 days from referral. We aimed to reduce the time to AVF creation in our centre to &lt;40 days over a 6-month period to bring it closer to international standards.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A multidisciplinary team (physician, surgeons, nurse, patient service associate and vascular technologist) was formed to undertake a Clinical Practice Improvement Program (CPIP). Applying CPIP methodology [flowchart, brainstorming, affinity diagram, cause and effect diagram, multi-voting, Pareto Chart, Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA)], the team identified causes and developed interventions for the project.</p></sec><sec><st>PDSA 1</st><p>Creation of an outpatient workflow for patients to have a vascular clinic appointment on the same day after vein mapping and desyncing the need for a formal vein map before listing for surgery by using a bedside ultrasound to assess the vasculature in the clinic instead.</p></sec><sec><st>PDSA 2</st><p>Creation of an inpatient workflow for access creation by defining inclusion/exclusion criteria, allowing suitable patients to be reviewed inpatient and undergoing access creation during inpatient stay if suitable, otherwise patients underwent inpatient vein mapping and were listed for outpatient creation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>There was an overall reduction in median time from 142 days to 78 days for the patients who were able to undergo the interventions in the project. Most patients preferred to have a clinic review on the same day as their vein map. During the interventional phases, patients expressed satisfaction with the interventions as the number of visits to hospital was reduced. Patients on catheters may also get admitted for access dysfunction, with the estimated cost of admission around SGD$12 000. Extrapolating from the annual admissions for dysfunction, the annual potential cost saving was SGD$870 000.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Even in a complex heterogenous group of patients like the ESKD population, using CPIP methodology is valuable to facilitate interdepartmental coordination of care and improvement to patient care.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Pang SC, Tan RY, Kwek JL, <I>et al</I>. Current state of vascular access in Singapore. <I>The Journal of Vascular Access</I> 2019;<b>21</b>(5):582&ndash;588. doi:10.1177/1129729819878595</p></li><li><p>Ethier J, Mendelssohn DC, Elder SJ, Hasegawa T, Akizawa T, Akiba T, Canaud BJ, Pisoni RL. Vascular access use and outcomes: an international perspective from the dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study. <I>Nephrol Dial Transplant</I>. 2008 Oct;<b>23</b>(10):3219&ndash;26. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn261. Epub 2008 May 29. Erratum in: <I>Nephrol Dial Transplant</I>. 2008 Dec;<b>23</b>(12):4088. PMID: 18511606; PMCID: PMC2542410</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jee Kam Koh, T., Han Wen Mak, M., Ying, P., Maano, K., Lee, J., Binte Mumazat, A., Tan Hui Min, G., Prakash, P. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.166</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.166</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[166 Improving the experience: reducing time to permanent haemodialysis access creation for end-stage kidney disease patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A122</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A122</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A122-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[167 Clinical governance unplugged: turning dull into dynamic for resident doctors]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A122-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Learning opportunities for junior doctors are sporadic and frequently overlooked due to heavy workload demands. As a result, trainees feel undervalued and demotivated, which can negatively affect their professional development and morale. This not only impacts their training but also has a ripple effect on the quality of patient care they provide. Addressing these gaps is crucial to nurturing a well-trained, motivated workforce that can uphold the highest standards of patient care. This project was completed in the Paediatric Department at North Middlesex Hospital NHS Trust in London as part of a blended learning course which was structured to guide us through a full Quality Improvement Project (QIP) over six months. Initial observations revealed the challenges junior doctors face in accessing departmental teachings. To better understand these issues, process map was created to highlight points where learning opportunities were missed. A fishbone analysis helped identify key root causes, such as time constraints, insufficient staffing, and poor scheduling. Using a bar chart, attendance at various departmental teachings was analysed, which revealed that &lsquo;Clinical Governance teachings&rsquo; had the lowest attendance, which became the focus for my improvement efforts. To engage stakeholders. To engage stakeholders, the bar chart was presented to governance leads, who acknowledged the issue and suggested additional collaborators. During the diagnosis and design phase feedback was sought from five parents of patients regarding their views on missed learning opportunities for junior doctors and potential solutions for improvement. The parents&rsquo; responses were overwhelmingly supportive, as they believed that addressing these gaps would better equip junior doctors, ultimately enhancing the quality of patient care.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>I applied the Model for Improvement to set my SMART aim and establish a baseline measure. Our aim was: &lsquo;By the end of 6 months from May 2024 till October 2024, all junior doctors in the paediatric department will access monthly risk and governance learnings, enhancing their self-reported knowledge and awareness of clinical governance.&rsquo; As the change ideas were implemented, two questions were asked weekly during morning handovers: (i) access to learning (yes/no) and ii) perceived improvement in knowledge &amp; awareness (yes/no). I established a baseline to understand the typical variation before implementing any change ideas. A run chart was employed to analyse weekly data after implementing change ideas, tracking variations and intervention impacts over time. In total 8 Plan-do-Study-Act cycles were conducted to implement all the change ideas. Adopted change ideas included organising dedicated consultant-led governance teaching, governance newsletters, DATIX microteachings, WhatsApp circulations, Creating roles for Junior doctor governance champions, and a Clinical Governance nurse. Abandoned ideas were recorded teachings on a digital platform, protected attendance time, organising &lsquo;Clinical governance Awareness weeks,&rsquo; adopting unique teaching methods like simulations. Escape room, and Junior doctors to shadow consultants for DATIX reviews. To promote these ideas effectively, I developed and delivered engaging 3-minute pitches to junior doctors and consultants. These concise presentations captured attention, fostered interest, and encourage active participation in the improvement process.</p></sec><sec><st>Result</st><p>The change ideas resulted in a run of 10 consecutive data points above the baseline median on the run chart, indicating a significant and positive impact. This consistent improvement demonstrate that the interventions were effective and that the process changes led to real, measurable progress. Moreover, this upward trend remained steady over time, showing that the enhancements were not only successful initially but were also sustained throughout the project duration. Although I did not fully achieve my aim of having all junior doctors access the learning from monthly governance meetings over the 6 months period of the project, our implemented change ideas resulted in a significant improvement. More Resident doctors were able to engage with the learning and hence expressed enhanced awareness of governance issues, highlighting the positive impact of our efforts even if the original goal wasn&rsquo;t entirely met. We received great support and positive feedback from both senior colleagues and resident doctors, and there seems to be a genuine interest and enthusiasm among the juniors to continue the educational activities we introduced. This engagement has been encouraging, as it suggests the changes are making a meaningful difference in shaping the department&rsquo;s learning culture. By enhancing their awareness, we took a key step toward empowering them to deliver safer, higher-quality patient care. Presenting this project at the regional London School of Paediatrics Meetings further amplified its reach, enabling me to share the outcomes, lessons learned, and practical strategies with a broader professional audience</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Singh, L., Islam, S., Garg, S., Hodges, N., Davey, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.167</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.167</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[167 Clinical governance unplugged: turning dull into dynamic for resident doctors]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A122</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A123</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A124-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[169 Evaluating the accuracy of an AI system in classifying patient safety incidents: a comparative study with hospital-based risk manager decisions, achieving 90% accuracy across core safety pillars]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A124-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Patient safety is the key to healthcare quality, and incident reporting is essential for risk identification and prevention. Critical incident reporting helps to identify risks and prevent adverse outcomes. Traditionally, hospital risk managers classify incidents; however, subjective judgments can affect classification consistency. With AI advancements, complex tasks like incident classification can be automated, potentially streamline processes and reduce staff workload. This study evaluates an AI system using large language models (LLMs) and machine learning (ML) to classify incidents across specified patient safety categories, assessing alignment and accuracy compared to human assessments.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A random sample of 249 anonymized patient safety incident reports from the hospital was selected for this study. The Al system, which was designed to analyse and categorise text-based data automatically, categorized the incidents across four defined pillars &mdash; Risk Rating, Process Section, Problem Categorization, and Severe Adverse Event (SAE), and assessed them based on input data. The results generated by the AI system were compared to hospital-based risk manager decisions to assess compliance and identify discrepancies. There were introduced four categories to measure the level of agreement with the hospital&rsquo;s baseline classifications. Exact Match (full compliance between human decision and AI results), Partial Match (no complete conformity; AI system matches on one or more aspects), Near Match (applicable only to the risk rating category; deviation within agreed tolerance [&plusmn;1 grade] considered acceptable), and Mismatch (Significant deviation between AI system&rsquo;s classification and hospital baseline decision.). To subject them to a double check, the results were re-validated by hospital&rsquo;s safety and quality subject matter expert.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p> The system demonstrated strong performance in risk rating and process section categorisation, aligning well with hospital risk managers. However, some discrepancies emerged in problem categorisation, likely due to the inherent complexity and subjectivity involved. These findings highlight the promise of AI in automating incident reporting, though varying accuracy across the pillars underscores the challenges associated with subjective human decision-making and the nuances of patient safety classification.</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Risk Rating: The AI system matched the baseline classification exactly in 42% of cases (104 out of 249), with partial or near matches in 53% (133 reports). Mismatches were found in 5% of classifications (12 cases), yielding an overall alignment of 95%, indicating that the AI system reliably assesses incident severity according to hospital-established risk ratings.</p></li><li><p>Process Section: For Process Section, which includes seven high-level hospital processes (e.g. Admission, Diagnostics), the AI performed well, achieving exact matches in 79% of cases (196 reports). Partial matches accounted for 14% (35 cases), with 7% of cases (18 reports) classified as mismatches. This high 93% alignment underscores the system&rsquo;s effectiveness in structured categorization.</p></li><li><p>Problem Categorization: This multi-level categorization is complex for classification. Here, the AI achieved exact matches in 35% of cases (87 reports) and partial matches in 50% (125 cases). Mismatches were found in 15% (37 cases), with an overall accuracy of 85%. These results suggest the AI can identify broad-level issues, though additional refinement is needed for specific subcategories.</p></li><li><p>Severe Adverse Events (SAE): For SAE identification, which mandates reporting of significant incidents, the AI achieved 86% exact matches (214 reports). Partial matches were noted in less than 1% (1 report), with 13% (33 reports) categorised as mismatches, showing strong reliability in SAE identification, with an overall accuracy of 86%.</p></li></l></p><p>This study demonstrates the potential of AI systems to complement human efforts in patient safety incident classification, showing the overall average of 90% accuracy across all pillars. However, further refinement is required in areas such as multi-level problems. As AI technology continues to evolve, its integration into hospital safety protocols could significantly enhance the consistency and efficiency of reporting, automating much of the administrative work.</p><p>This automation would alleviate the burden on safety and quality teams, ultimately contributing to improved patient safety outcomes.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schneider, K., Kondylis, S., Keller, J., Jacoby, D., Paldi, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.169</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.169</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[169 Evaluating the accuracy of an AI system in classifying patient safety incidents: a comparative study with hospital-based risk manager decisions, achieving 90% accuracy across core safety pillars]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A124</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A124</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A124-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[170 Building QI capability in primary care network Singapore: improving patient care in primary care setting]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A124-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Singapore&rsquo;s healthcare system faces increasing pressure due to an aging population and chronic disease burden. It is projected that by 2030, one in four Singaporeans will be 65 or older with increasing healthcare needs. To address these needs, Ministry of Health Singapore embarked on a multi-year strategy - Healthier SG<sup>1</sup> to take a life course approach to drive population health. One of the key pillars, is in transforming primary care, activating networks of family physicians and reorganising care delivery. To support this care transformation, the National Improvement Unit (NIU)<sup>2</sup> developed the QI Project Consult programme with 11 primary care networks (PCNs) made up of more than 700 clinics,<sup>3</sup> to improve preventive and chronic diseases management to operationalise the Healthier SG strategy.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The QI Project Consult Programme was designed to foster collaboration, knowledge-sharing, and systematic improvements within the participating PCNs. The programme utilised the Model for Improvement<sup>4</sup> framework and included tailored quality improvement workshops (figure1) for PCN teams, where they developed a theory of change, outlining their desired outcomes and identifying areas for testing through small Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Before commencement, baseline data on the performance of the PCNs was collected to assess the current state of chronic care management and preventive health measures. Based on the data, each team identified specific indicators in chronic disease management, vaccination and screening rates that they would work on. Over the six-month programme, the teams engaged in monthly coaching sessions with improvement advisors from NIU. These coaching sessions were designed to provide ongoing guidance and support, helping teams refine their improvement processes. Storyboards, which outlined each team&rsquo;s QI journey, were shared across various platforms to garner buy-in from early adopters and encourage others to adopt similar change initiatives.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 170 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Topics included in customised quality improvement workshop</p></caption><link locator="170_F1"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The programme started with six project teams working with 63 participating clinics on one the following: management of diabetes mellitus, obesity, influenzas vaccination rate, Diabetic foot and eye screening rate. Significant gains in process effectiveness, team capacity, and patient outcomes were reported. Self-reported pre and post measures on QI capability shows an increase from 4.5 to 7.5 on a 10-point scale. To highlight the results from one of the teams working on Diabetic foot and eye screening rate, there was an increase of 28% <I>(from a median of 64 to </I>  <I>82)</I> and 51% <I>(from a median of 49 to </I>  <I>74)</I> respectively (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>). Qualitative feedback from the project teams acknowledged that time, resource and data availability continued to pose challenges that slowed the momentum and dampened their will to persevere. There was also a request to extend the six-month programme to 12 months to provide ongoing coaching and support for their improvement efforts. With the preliminary results, NIU learned that a platform for sharing of QI knowledge and best practices is pivotal to sustain improvement work and established its first Improvers Network SingaPore, Community of pRacticE (INSpire) in November 2024 to include the PCN teams and improvers from other public healthcare institutions as a community of practice to share best practices and encourage network learning.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 170 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Run chart on number of diabetic foot and eye screening</p></caption><link locator="170_F2"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>The White Paper on Healthier SG. www.healthiersg.gov.sg. [cited 2022 Sep 25]. Available from: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.healthiersg.gov.sg/resources/white-paper/</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>National Improvement Unit. MOH Office for Healthcare Transformation. 2025 [cited 2025 Mar 23]. Available from: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://moht.com.sg/our-programmes/national-improvement-unit/</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Abdullah Z. 712 GP clinics have joined Healthier SG so far: Health Minister Ong Ye Kung. The Straits Times. 2023 Apr 5 [cited 2023 Nov 1]; Available from: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/health/712-gp-clinics-have-joined-healthier-sg-so-far-ong-ye-kung</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Langley GJ, Moen RD, Nolan KM, Nolan TW, Norman CL, Provost LP. The Improvement Guide. John Wiley &amp; Sons; 2009.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Priya Francis, S., Wong, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.170</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.170</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[170 Building QI capability in primary care network Singapore: improving patient care in primary care setting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A124</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A126</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A127-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[172 Weaning into tablets - encouraging patients 5 -12 yrs old to swallow tablets]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A127-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Liquid medications are commonly prescribed for children, but many find them unpalatable, leading to poor compliance. Some children might prefer tablets if given proper guidance. This issue affects both treatment efficacy and healthcare costs. The project, conducted in the paediatric department of a District General Hospital, focused on patients aged 5&ndash;12 years. The cause and extent of the problem was assessed using initial observation, process mapping, fishbone diagrams, and bar charts.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>  <b>I</b> employed the Model for Improvement to design my quality improvement initiative, informed by initial diagnostics and incorporating a SMART aim and baseline measure. The baseline measure quantified the number of liquid medications for children aged 5&ndash;12 that could be substituted with tablets or capsules. Early engagement with colleagues helped generate ideas for testing using Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles.</p><p>Four ideas were selectively tested and implemented through nine PDSA cycles. These included:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Presenting a video explaining tablet-swallowing techniques to interested patients</p></li><li><p>Sharing the video with colleagues for broader patient outreach</p></li><li><p>Involving nursing staff through presentations and feedback sessions</p></li><li><p>Organising a tablet clinic</p></li></l></p><p>Results were analysed using a run chart with a median baseline to identify statistically significant changes. The tablet clinic and patient education on swallowing techniques resulted in a step change, with six consecutive data points above the median baseline.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A 70% success rate was achieved in transitioning children from liquid to oral tablet medications, a notable accomplishment given time constraint. Personal instruction yielded remarkable improvements, and tested ideas resulted in a statistically significant shift on the run chart.</p><p>This transition benefits patients by simplifying medication administration and potentially increasing compliance, with obvious advantages for their health and well-being. It also enhanced staff job satisfaction, indirectly benefiting patients.</p><p>The Model for Improvement proved to be a powerful and effective change methodology, providing a structured approach to implementing and sustaining this change in paediatric medication administration.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Papamichail, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.172</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.172</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[172 Weaning into tablets - encouraging patients 5 -12 yrs old to swallow tablets]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A127</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A127</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A127-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[173 Establishing a POPS pre-operative clinic to improve the care for frail patients awaiting elective surgery]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A127-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Context</st><p>This project was undertaken in the surgical division of a 230-bed district general hospital and led by the geriatric medicine team.</p><p>The project is a joint initiative between the pre-operative department, geriatric medicine and surgical teams. The patient group involved are frail elderly patients undergoing elective surgery at our hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Problem</st><p>Both frailty and complex co-morbidity is on the rise and patients are being considered for surgery who would have previously been excluded on the grounds of age or medical issues. The pre-operative assessment service is well set up to consider the issues when assessing patients, but there is no suitable process for the management of patients with regard to undergoing a comprehensive geriatric assessment. This means that there is limited opportunity to consider &lsquo;prehabilitation&rsquo;, medication optimisation and management of comorbidities. The risk is that patients may experience post-operative complications such as prolonged rehabilitation, delirium and decompensation of their pre-existing medical conditions.</p><p>Assessment of Problem and Analysis of its Causes</p><p>We followed patient journeys to consider where the unmet need was. For example, there was limited pre-operative support for patients with cognitive impairment, particularly around the risks and management of post-operative delirium. Surgical and anaesthetic teams were involved, alongside working with teams responsible for post discharge rehabilitation care.</p></sec><sec><st>Intervention</st><p>The aim is to establish a geriatric-led clinic for patients awaiting elective surgery, who have been identified as frail and requiring geriatric input in the anaesthetic pre-operative clinic.</p><p>This has so far involved a &lsquo;test of change&rsquo; cohort, where patients were reviewed in geriatrics clinics during early-mid 2024.</p></sec><sec><st>Strategy for Change</st><p>We analysed data from seven patients seen in POPS (perioperative medicine for older people undergoing surgery) pre-operative clinics during 2024. We reviewed key themes discussed during consultations, such as resuscitation discussions, and changes to medications, as well as looking at ultimate surgical outcomes for these patients.</p><p>Based on this, we aim to establish more structured clinics as a pilot. This will be one afternoon every two weeks, with scheduled time for two patients per clinic. The clinics will be run by a staff grade doctor with support from a geriatric medicine consultant. The clinics will start in November 2024, running until approximately June 2025. During this time, the aim will be to review approximately 40 patients.</p><p>We have designed a poster with criteria and methods for referral, which will be disseminated to colleagues performing pre-operative assessments.</p><p>In addition to the quantitative data, we are hoping to be able to gather feedback from colleagues, as well as from patients and family members attending the clinic.</p></sec><sec><st>Measurement of Improvement</st><p>Our results are from the preliminary test of change cohort. We focused on process measures such as how many people were assessed in clinic (seven), and time from referral to clinic (average of approximately 19 days). We also found that medications were altered in five of these patients, and resuscitation discussions were had in three.</p><p>Outcome measures were focused on overall outcomes &ndash; whether they went on to have surgery and any complications. At the time of analysis, the outcomes are known for five out of seven patients. Three of these patients proceeded to surgery. Of these, one patient experienced post-operative complications, whilst the other two were discharged with no post-operative complications.</p><p>Please Describe How You Have Involved Patents, Carers, or Family Members in The Project</p><p>The test of change focused on feasibility of the intervention. Moving forward, we are hoping to be able to gather feedback from patients and family members attending clinic.</p></sec><sec><st>Effects of Changes</st><p>As a result of the test of change cohort, seven patients had a review pre-operatively by the geriatrics team. Looking at the measures described above, the POPS clinic provided the opportunity to optimise patients&rsquo; medications prior to surgery, with the aim of optimising their medical comorbidities. It also allowed patients to discuss future wishes around resuscitation, as well as wider discussions about their priorities including whether surgery is the right choice for them.</p><p>Moving forward, we are aiming to set standards for the POPS pre-operative clinics, by using the ICHOM patient priorities for &lsquo;older people&rsquo; and &lsquo;hip and knee osteoarthritis&rsquo;, given that the majority of the patients seen in clinic were awaiting orthopaedic surgery. We anticipate that by addressing these patient priorities in clinic, this will improve the experience for patients awaiting elective surgery, and aim to reduce post-operative complications.</p><p>When implementing this change, there have been challenges including staff absences, and balancing this clinic work with the pressures of inpatient work.</p></sec><sec><st>Lessons Learned</st><p>This project is still a work in progress. We anticipate that there may be challenges regarding appropriate referrals to the service, which we aim to mitigate by disseminating referral criteria.</p><p>We are also learning by shadowing POPS departments in other hospitals, with an &lsquo;adopt and adapt&rsquo; approach.</p><p>We will aim to gather informal and formal feedback throughout this process, with the aim to make frequent small changes to improve the experience.</p></sec><sec><st>Messages for Others</st><p>The main aim for this project is to improve the care for frail patients who are awaiting elective surgery. We provide holistic optimisation for patients, and allow patients the time to discuss their own concerns and priorities ahead of surgery.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sinha-Royle, E., Gilpin, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.173</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.173</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[173 Establishing a POPS pre-operative clinic to improve the care for frail patients awaiting elective surgery]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A127</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A128</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A132-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[178 Utilizing the early warning score (EWS) system to enhance early identification of sepsis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A132-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Early identification of sepsis is essential to reduce morbidity and mortality.<sup>1&ndash;5</sup> The National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) and the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) are widely used tools to detect clinical deterioration; however, their comparative predictive performance in applied clinical environments remains under investigation.<sup>6&ndash;8</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This study aimed to compare the predictive performance of NEWS2 and qSOFA in identifying infection, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and in-hospital mortality using routinely collected electronic medical record (EMR) data.<sup>9</sup>  </p><p>Design, Setting, and Participants</p><p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study analyzing data from 5,906 adult inpatients admitted to general wards in 2024. Patients who were directly admitted to the ICU were excluded. Clinical data were automatically extracted from EMRs. Infection was defined by the presence of positive bacterial cultures.</p><p>Main Outcomes and Measures</p><p>The primary outcomes were ICU admission and in-hospital mortality. NEWS2 and qSOFA scores were calculated from routinely recorded vital signs and clinical parameters. Comparative analyses were performed using t-tests, chi-square tests, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to assess predictive performance.<sup>8 10</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among 5,906 patients, 517 (8.8%) had confirmed infections. Infected patients had significantly higher in-hospital mortality (39.1% vs. 3.9%) and ICU admission rates (58.6% vs. 11.4%) than non-infected patients (p &lt; 0.001). Mean NEWS2 scores were significantly higher in infected (7.75 &plusmn; 3.44) and ICU-admitted (8.12 &plusmn; 3.50) patients compared to their respective counterparts. ROC curve analysis demonstrated that NEWS2 outperformed qSOFA in predicting both infection (AUROC 0.844 vs. 0.718) and ICU admission (AUROC 0.689 vs. 0.607).<sup>9 10</sup> A NEWS2 threshold of &ge;5 yielded high sensitivity (86.1%) and negative predictive value (94.2%) for identifying infection.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>NEWS2 is a more effective tool than qSOFA for early identification of infection and prediction of ICU admission.<sup>9 10</sup> A threshold of NEWS2 &ge;5 is recommended for early clinical reassessment. Integration of NEWS2 into EMR systems may support timely sepsis recognition and intervention.<sup>6</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Buchman TG, <I>et al</I>. Sepsis among medicare beneficiaries: 1. The burdens of sepsis, 2012&ndash;2018<I>. Critical Care Medicine</I> 2020;<b>48</b>(3):276&ndash;288.</p></li><li><p>Churpek MM, <I>et al</I>. Multicenter development and validation of a risk stratification tool for ward patients<I>. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine</I> 2014;<b>190</b>(6):649&ndash;655.</p></li><li><p>Escobar GJ, <I>et al</I>. Early detection of impending physiologic deterioration among patients who are not in intensive care: development of predictive models using data from an automated electronic medical record. <I>Journal of Hospital Medicine</I> 2012;<b>7</b>(5):388&ndash;395.</p></li><li><p>Liu V, <I>et al</I>. Hospital deaths in patients with sepsis from 2 independent cohorts<I>. JAMA.</I> 2014;<b>312</b>(1):90&ndash;92.</p></li><li><p>Rhee C, <I>et al</I>. Prevalence, underlying causes, and preventability of sepsis-associated mortality in US acute care hospitals<I>. JAMA Network Open</I> 2019;<b>2</b>(2):e187571-e187571.</p></li><li><p>Castello LM, Gavelli F. Sepsis scoring systems: mindful use in clinical practice. <I>European Journal of Internal Medicine</I> 2024.</p></li><li><p>Osawa I, <I>et al</I>. Clinical performance of early warning scoring systems for identifying sepsis among anti-hypertensive agent users. <I>The American Journal of Emergency Medicine</I> 2021;<b>48</b>:120&ndash;127.</p></li><li><p>Silcock DJ, <I>et al</I>. Superior performance of National Early Warning Score compared with quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in predicting adverse outcomes: a retrospective observational study of patients in the prehospital setting<I>. European Journal of Emergency Medicine</I> 2019;<b>26</b>(6):433&ndash;439.</p></li><li><p>Liu VX, <I>et al</I>. Comparison of early warning scoring systems for hospitalized patients with and without infection at risk for in-hospital mortality and transfer to the intensive care unit. <I>JAMA network open.</I> 2020;<b>3</b>(5):e205191-e205191.</p></li><li><p>Kim H-J, <I>et al</I>. Sepsis Alert systems, Mortality, and adherence in Emergency departments: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. <I>JAMA network open.</I> 2024;<b>7</b>(7):e2422823-e2422823.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, L.-C., Chen, C.-M., Chen, S.-Y., Tsai, I.-J., Jerng, J.-S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.178</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.178</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[178 Utilizing the early warning score (EWS) system to enhance early identification of sepsis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A132</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A132</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A132-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[179 Using information systems to assist in the early identification of employees psychological conditions and enhance employee resilience]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A132-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The COVID-19 pandemic placed significant stress on healthcare systems and workers worldwide, leading to increased psychological distress due to heavy workloads, infection risks, and emotional strain.<sup>1 2</sup> with studies recommending stress management programs, self-care training, and resilience-building initiatives.<sup>3&ndash;9</sup>  </p><p>We developed a proactive care mechanism to enhance staff mental health management and maintain stable healthcare performance under high-pressure conditions. This paper outlines the system&rsquo;s development and outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Developed by the Quality Management Center in collaboration with the Clinical Psychology Center, Human Resources Office, and Department of Psychiatry, this initiative integrates the Brief Symptom Rating Scale (BSRS-5) into the employee satisfaction survey using the REDCap system. The system immediately calculates BSRS-5 scores upon survey completion, triggering alerts for employees scoring &ge;15 or reporting moderate suicidal thoughts. With consent, the Clinical Psychology Center provides timely psychological support and consultations. To ensure continuity of care, the system includes a dedicated follow-up record for at-risk employees. Additionally, a &lsquo;Green Channel&rsquo; collaboration with the Department of Psychiatry allows priority registration for psychiatric consultations.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>From 2022 to 2024, the incidence of severe emotional distress was 3.77%, 4.10%, and 3.87%, showing little change, with work-related stress remaining the primary source. Emotional distress decreased among physicians and technical staff but slightly increased among nurses and medical personnel. However, employees&rsquo; willingness to use psychological support services remained low, with fluctuating acceptance rates (3.81%, 6.74%, and 0%), indicating a need to improve the accessibility and acceptance of mental health resources. Future efforts should focus on identifying stressors specific to different job categories, strengthening workplace support mechanisms, and further encouraging employees to actively utilize mental health services.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Da Rosa P, <I>et al</I>. Factors associated with nurses emotional distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. <I>Applied Nursing Research</I> 2021;<b>62</b>:151502.</p></li><li><p>Erquicia J, <I>et al</I>. Emotional impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on healthcare workers in one of the most important infection outbreaks in Europe.<I> Medicina Cl&iacute;nica (English Edition)</I> 2020;<b>155</b>(10):434&ndash;440.</p></li><li><p>Aljehani YM, <I>et al</I>. Stress and psychological resilience among general surgery residents during COVID-19 pandemic. <I>Saudi Medical Journal</I> 2020;<b>41</b>(12):1344.</p></li><li><p>Bozda&#x011F; F, and N Ergu&#x0308;n. Psychological resilience of healthcare professionals during Covid-19 Pandemic. <I>Psychological Reports</I> 2021;<b>124</b>(6):2567&ndash;2586.</p></li><li><p>Crocamo C, <I>et al</I>. Some of us are most at risk: Systematic review and meta-analysis of correlates of depressive symptoms among healthcare workers during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak<I>. Neuroscience &amp; Biobehavioral Reviews</I> 2021;<b>131</b>:912&ndash;922.</p></li><li><p>Du J, <I>et al</I>. Psychological symptoms among frontline healthcare workers during COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan<I>. General Hospital Psychiatry</I> 2020;<b>67</b>:144.</p></li><li><p>Greenberg N, <I>et al.</I> Managing mental health challenges faced by healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic. <I>BMJ.</I> 2020;<b>368</b>.</p></li><li><p>Maunder RG, <I>et al</I>. Applying the lessons of SARS to pandemic influenza: an evidence-based approach to mitigating the stress experienced by healthcare workers.<I> Canadian Journal of Public Health</I> 2008;<b>99</b>:486&ndash;488.</p></li><li><p>Walton M, Murray E, Christian MD. Mental health care for medical staff and affiliated healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. <I>European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care</I> 2020;<b>9</b>(3):241&ndash;247.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, Y.-L., Chen, S.-J., Chang, H.-C., Chung, S.-Y., Chen, I.-M., Chuang, P.-Y., Jerng, J.-S., Wang, T.-G., Chen, S.-Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.179</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.179</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[179 Using information systems to assist in the early identification of employees psychological conditions and enhance employee resilience]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A132</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A133</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A133-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[180 Developing an information resource for healthcare professionals (HCPS) to increase awareness and knowledge of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy and enhance post-discharge care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A133-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>MR-guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) Thalamotomy is a novel and minimally invasive treatment for Tremor. Approximately 300 people with Tremor have received this treatment in the United Kingdom (UK). At Imperial, 8% of NHS patients undergoing MRgFUS for tremor experience significant gait difficulties, and 14% report minor gait impairment following this procedure. These complications require the involvement of community rehabilitation teams for effective patient management.</p><p>No data was found regarding any free and easy-access educational resources for HCPs on MRgFUS Thalamotomy in the UK. This gap is particularly significant in post-discharge care, where HCPs enhance post-operative recovery through neurorehabilitation.</p><p>The project aims to ensure that 100% of HCPs involved in post-MRgFUS care have access to information resources by July 2025 to support the provision of care for this cohort of patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This quality improvement (QI) project was based on the Model for Improvement.<sup>1</sup> The improvement tools used for root cause analysis were the 5 Whys and the Ishikawa (fishbone) diagram. The theory of change was presented using a driver diagram, which helped identify the improvement measures.<sup>2</sup> The team chose an Ease-Impact (PICK) chart to categorise the interventions according to their return on investment. Outcome, balancing, and process measures were established.</p><p>The team used structured interviews, surveys, and focus groups to obtain feedback from stakeholders in the first Plan-Study-Do-Act cycle, which is ongoing.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The data indicates that the stakeholders agree that such resources are necessary and that they may help fill existing knowledge gaps and improve team collaboration.</p><p>The project shows a gap in educational resources to support HCPs and patients following MRgFUS thalamotomy. The stakeholders favour accessing educational resources and collaboration platforms to support the provision of care for this subgroup of patients.</p><p>Further QI work is needed to assess the extent of the improvement.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Institute for Healthcare Improvement (no date) <I>How to Improve: Model for Improvement.</I> Available at: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">How to Improve: Model for Improvement | Institute for Healthcare Improvement</inter-ref> (accessed: 6 November 2024)</p></li><li><p>Swanwick T, Vaux E. (eds.) (2020). <I>ABC of Quality Improvement in Healthcare</I>. First Edition. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley Blackwell.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aminata, B., Nagina, S., Dolin, B., Neekhil, P., Matteo, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.180</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.180</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[180 Developing an information resource for healthcare professionals (HCPS) to increase awareness and knowledge of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy and enhance post-discharge care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A133</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A133</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A133-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[181 Exploring healthcare provider perspectives on focused trainings and quality improvement initiatives in the intensive care unit of the national hospital in Tanzania]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A133-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Quality Improvement (QI) programs have become widely utilized in healthcare, as they provide means to recognize areas of improvement and implement continuing progress and change in order to best deliver care to patients.<sup>1</sup> While Tanzania has adopted QI as part of its national healthcare, there are still constraints to achieving optimal care, especially in critical care settings.<sup>2&ndash;5</sup> Existing QI initiatives have been successful at the National Hospital in Tanzania.<sup>6</sup> Yet, the perception of QI by healthcare workers (HCWs) at the National Hospital, as well as what HCWs envision are the next steps to facilitating improved healthcare for patients remains to be fully investigated.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Following a QI initiative at the National Hospital that involved critical care and resuscitation concepts, semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted amongst attendees. Themes included critical care concepts, impressions of QI and how trainings may affect their future practice. Interviewees were identified via snowballing and were included in the study if they underwent the recent QI training initiative as well as held a leadership role in their unit or the hospital. Seven total providers were interviewed. Analysis was conducted with line-by-line coding and interview themes were extracted.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Every respondent addressed how the QI initiative had affected their perception of their role at the hospital and focused on the changes they would implement moving forward for patients. Other themes included structural and resource constraints that pose barriers to the success of QI and healthcare delivery. The HCWs also spoke about change management and how this created a shift in who could be a change maker. As such, interviewees spoke about the need to have a team that is not based in hierarchy so as to be able to respond to critical care crises appropriately and in a timely manner to save lives.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>This research demonstrates how initiatives focused on uplifting HCWs&rsquo; abilities in and aptitude for their role can mark real change. There was especially an emphasis on the effect of change management. Future trainings directed at these measures can strengthen the individual as well as the team and be beneficial for hospitals in low-resourced areas.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Aveling E, Martin G, Armstrong N, Banerjee J, Dixon-Woods M. Quality improvement through clinical communities: eight lessons for practice. <I>Journal of Health Organization and Management</I> 2012;<b>26</b>(2):158&ndash;174. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.1108/14777261211230754</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Ishijima H, Eliakimu E, Takahashi S, Miyamoto N. Factors influencing national rollout of quality improvement approaches to public hospitals in Tanzania. <I>Clinical Governance: An International Journal</I> 2014;<b>19</b>(2):137&ndash;152. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.1108/CGIJ-09-2013-0033</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Ministry of Health and Social Welfare. (2011). <I>The Tanzania Quality Improvement Framework in Health Care, 2011&ndash;2016</I>. Ministry of Health and Social Welfare.</p></li><li><p>Kruk ME, Gage AD, Joseph NT, Danaei G, Garc&iacute;a-Sais&oacute; S, Salomon JA. Mortality due to low-quality health systems in the universal health coverage era: a systematic analysis of amenable deaths in 137 countries. <I>Lancet (London, England)</I> 2018;<b>392</b>(10160):2203&ndash;2212. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31668-4</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Sawe HR, Mfinanga JA, Lidenge SJ, Mpondo BC, Msangi S, Lugazia E, Mwafongo V, Runyon MS, Reynolds TA. Disease patterns and clinical outcomes of patients admitted in intensive care units of tertiary referral hospitals of Tanzania. <I>BMC International Health and Human Rights</I> 2014;<b>14</b>(1):26. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-698X-14-26</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Strelzer S, Julius J, Anicet N, Byabato O, Chiwanga F, Hassan S, Kayandabila F, Laizer A, Majuta T, Murray B, Said T, Ndile S. Combining quality improvement and critical care training: evaluating an ICU CPR training programme quality improvement initiative at the national hospital in Tanzania. <I>BMJ Open Quality</I> 2024;<b>13</b>(4):e002891.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Strelzer, S., Julius, J., Solomon, C., Anicet, N., Byabato, O., Chiwanga, F., Hassan, S., Kayandabila, F., Laizer, A., Majuta, T., Murray, B., Said, T., Ndile, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.181</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.181</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[181 Exploring healthcare provider perspectives on focused trainings and quality improvement initiatives in the intensive care unit of the national hospital in Tanzania]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A133</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A134</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A136-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[184 Application of multidisciplinary team to reduce clostridium difficile infections density with pediatric oncology ward]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A136-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a common cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea, particularly affecting pediatric oncology patients who are immunocompromised due to cancer treatments and those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.<sup>1 2</sup> CDI can lead to prolonged hospital stays, increased medical costs, and significant health risks.<sup>3 4</sup> To support this process, we will conduct a retrospective chart review and utilize a &lsquo;Healthcare-Associated Infections Report&rsquo; to provide a comprehensive description of the adverse events. In the second phase, qualitative data analysis will be conducted, gathering data through individual semi-structured interviews with medical staff. Factors contributing to this quality gap include: patients with compromised immunity, inappropriate antibiotic use, limited awareness of isolation protocols among medical staff and caregivers, inappropriate environmental cleaning and disinfection.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We developed the following methods: (1) Form a multidisciplinary team: Involve infection control specialists, pharmacists, and child-friendly healthcare personnel (e.g., Dr. RedNose) to ensure comprehensive care. (2)Educate medical staff on isolation protocols: Provide proper training and continuous education to ensure adherence to isolation protocols. (3)Raise infection prevention awareness among patients and caregivers: Educate caregivers on infection prevention practices, e.g., hand hygiene and environmental cleanliness, to help reduce infection risks. (4) Routine cleaning with disinfectants: Regular cleaning was performed using 0.12% chlorine-based disinfectants to maintain a clean and safe environment.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We successfully established and implemented standardized CDI care practices among healthcare workers and increased infection prevention awareness among patients and caregivers. After implementing the program, our efforts effectively reduced CDI density from 0.86 to 0. These interventions not only protect immunocompromised pediatric patients but also enhance overall safety and quality of care in the ward.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Diorio C, Robinson PD, Ammann RA, Castagnola E,Erickson K, Esbenshade A, Brian TF, Haeusler GM, Kuczynski S, Lehrnbecher T, Phillips R, Cabral S, Dupuis LL, Sung L. Guideline for the management of clostridium difficile infection in children and adolescents with cancer and pediatric hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation recipients. <I>J Clin Oncol</I>. 2018 Nov;<b>36</b>(31):3162&ndash;3171. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00407. Epub 2018 Sep 14. PMID: 30216124; PMCID: PMC6209092</p></li><li><p>Kociolek LK, Gerding DN, Carrico R, Carling P, Donskey CJ, Dumyati G, Kuhar DT, Loo VG, Maragakis LL, Pogorzelska-Maziarz M, Sandora TJ, Weber DJ, Yokoe D, Dubberke ER. Strategies to prevent clostridioides difficile infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 update.<I> Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.</I> 2023 Apr;<b>44</b>(4):527&ndash;549. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.18.PMID: 37042243; PMCID: PMC10917144</p></li><li><p>Lemiech-Mirowska E, Gaszy&amp;nacute;ska E, Sierocka A, Kiersnowska Z, Marczak M. Clostridioides difficile infections among pediatric patients hospitalized at an oncology department of a tertiary hospital in Poland. <I>Medicina</I> 2023 Jul;<b>59</b>(8):1363. doi: 10.3390/medicina59081363. PMID: 37629653; PMCID: PMC10456884</p></li><li><p>Willis DN, Huang FS, Elward AM, Wu N, Magnusen B, Dubberke ER, <I>et al</I>. Clostridioides difficile infections in inpatient pediatric oncology patients: a cohort study evaluating risk factors and associated outcomes. <I>J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc</I>. 2021 Apr;<b>10</b>(3):302&ndash;308. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piaa090. PMID: 32766672; PMCID: PMC8023311</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lin, F.-R., Hsu, P.-Y., Lu, M.-Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.184</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.184</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[184 Application of multidisciplinary team to reduce clostridium difficile infections density with pediatric oncology ward]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A136</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A136</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A136-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[185 Making the mandatory meaningful - leveraging regulatory requirements to achieve system improvement]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A136-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Mandatory regulatory/College obligations can seem burdensome and feel like they pull you away from meaningful work. The College of Physicians and Surgeons Ontario (CPSO) in Canada has a QI partnership program for hospital-based physicians. This program makes QI activities a mandatory requirement of the regulatory college. One must complete a project to maintain their licensure. Hospital departments can sign up for a group QI project which is often less burdensome to physicians than an individual project. This also allows the hospital to align a project with a larger quality goal. In Ontario, Canada, three separate hospitals undertook this College program to improve psychiatric care.</p></sec><sec><st>Case Studies</st><p>Improving Communication at Discharge</p><p>Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care is a 315 bed psychiatric hospital located in Central Ontario. Transitions in care and the discharge summary were identified as the priority focus based on incident reviews. Twenty-five physicians participated in completing 5&ndash;10 self-directed chart reviews with peer feedback, auditing more than 100 records and identifying areas for improvement related to timeliness, distribution and formatting of discharge summaries. The results of this work informed the development of a dashboard to track discharge summary completion and display timely feedback to physicians. The work supported the business case for the redevelopment of the discharge summary in alignment with feedback from the QI program and our community providers. This discharge summary format has been adopted at two additional mental health facilities.</p><p>Suicide Risk Assessment</p><p>Mount Sinai Hospital is a general hospital with 400 beds in Toronto, Canada. Chart reviews demonstrated wide variation in the documentation of suicide risk assessment and intervention across psychiatric inpatient and outpatient programs. Leveraging the CPSO partnership program, we introduced the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS) to standardize suicide risk assessment and recruited 25 physicians to participate. A pilot implementation undertaken on one inpatient service between October 2023 to October 2024 yielded an increase in use of the CSSRS Screener from 43/268 (16.0%, pre-intervention) to 180/497 (36.2%, post-intervention). To spread from this pilot, in September 2024, an electronic version of the CSSRS was incorporated into the electronic patient record for outpatients. Between September and December 2024, the CSSRS Screener was completed for 321/448 (71.6%) of newly referred patients. Individualized audit and feedback to physicians will be used to sustain these gains and further enhance standardization to improve patient safety.</p><p>Measurement Based Care</p><p>The Department of Psychiatry at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, a 1325-bed general hospital in Toronto, Canada, aimed to address low utilization of Measurement-Based Care (MBC) among psychiatrists. At baseline, only 18% used scales to inform treatment decisions. The Department launched several iterative interventions including use of personalized monthly audit-feedback reports, individual coaching sessions, and opportunities for self-reflection. After 1 year, results demonstrated an increase in sustained MBC adherence from 25% to 57.5%. Some early-adopters maintained adherence above 70%. Barriers to adoption included practitioner skepticism regarding accuracy and utility of measures compared to clinical judgment, administrative workflow challenges and lack of an integrated EMR. Enablers included administrative support and offering patients the opportunity to discuss their improvements. This project highlights the need for stakeholder engagement, ongoing audit and feedback, and addressing administrative burden to sustain MBC implementation and inform future scale and spread of MBC in mental health settings more broadly.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Participation in the regulatory college&rsquo;s quality improvement partnership has been an effective lever to enhance physician engagement in adopting best practices in psychiatry including: improving the timeliness and quality of discharge communications, adopting a standardized approach to suicide risk assessment, and using measurement based care. Each project highlights the need for stakeholder engagement, audit and feedback, and addressing system level issues to facilitate clinician behaviour change.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burra, T. A., Mishra, A., Steinberg, R., Wang, K., Wiesenfeld, L., Waddell, A. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.185</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.185</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[185 Making the mandatory meaningful - leveraging regulatory requirements to achieve system improvement]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A136</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A137</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A137-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[186 Investigating if female patients (14-54) being prescribed topical retinoids have had appropriate contraceptive advice]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A137-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Acne vulgaris treatment is initiated in a stepwise manner according to severity but is escalated if ineffective. Topical retinoids are used for moderate to severe acne, and contraceptive counselling is required on commencement of treatment for female patients of reproductive age due to the risk of foetal abnormalities or miscarriage. This should be done before they are prescribed treatment as per NICE guidelines. This audit focuses on female patients aged between 14 and 54 who were prescribed topical retinoids in 2023 at a mixed urban/rural general practice with a population of 12,000 in Fife. It established whether the patient had received appropriate effective contraception and teratogenicity counselling on initiation of topical retinoid treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Methodology</st><p>Using a pre-approved protocol, the selection of participants was done by registration, prescription of topical retinoids in 2023, sex, and age. This gave a total of n=15 participants. Participant&rsquo;s electronic personal records from EMIS and DOCMAN were searched to determine when they were first prescribed topical retinoids, by whom and if the patient received contraceptive advice within that consultation. Statistical analysis was performed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Out of 15 participants, two-thirds of patients received contraceptive advice. All patients aged 20&ndash;29 received advice, whilst only two-thirds of patients aged 15&ndash;19 and 30&ndash;34 were advised. Half of 35&ndash;40-year-olds were advised and a patient over 40 was not advised. 72% of patients on effective contraception in comparison to 50% of patients not on contraception were advised about the teratogenic effects. 66% of 30&ndash;34- year-olds and 50% of 35&ndash;40-year-olds were on effective contraception on initiation of topical retinoid treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Three recommendations have been made. Alerts should be added to the EPR system to flag the need for contraceptive advice before a prescription is authorised and printed. A new policy should be implemented to ensure hospital medical records and outpatient clinic letters contain the same information, including contraceptive advice. Finally, a re-audit needs to be performed with a larger sample size, eg: health board or national level to achieve statistical significance.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Onaityte, G., Novicky, A., Goode, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.186</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.186</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[186 Investigating if female patients (14-54) being prescribed topical retinoids have had appropriate contraceptive advice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A137</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A137</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A137-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[187 Improving departmental quality improvement plans through standardization, structured peer-to-peer feedback, and building improvement capacity and culture]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A137-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><p>The lead author has seen and agreed to the license applied to conference abstracts published by BMJ.</p></sec><sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Quality Improvement Plans (QIPs) can improve healthcare quality by raising awareness and providing focus around improvement efforts.<sup>1</sup> Meanwhile, physician leadership and participation in an organization&rsquo;s quality agenda is required to improve patient safety and quality of care, and to attain organizational quality goals.<sup>2&ndash;8</sup> The physician-led quality committee at our institution set out to improve the previously heterogenous quality and content of medical department QIPs and increase alignment between medical department and hospital quality improvement (QI) priorities. We describe these initiatives and assess their impact on the quality of departmental QIPs.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The Physician Quality Committee at our academic tertiary care hospital implemented a series of interventions, including a peer-to-peer feedback mechanism, longitudinal education and coaching, standardized QI project templates, and efforts to facilitate culture change. The QIPs from 13 medical departments were reviewed for the academic years before (2018&ndash;2019) and after the interventions (2022&ndash;2023) and scored according to a structured rubric, created by consensus from physician quality leads. Data are reported as means and median [interquartile range]. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to evaluate for statistical significance. A Likert-scale survey was used to assess the physician QI leads perception of the impact of the initiatives.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The mean score on the structured rubric was 4.4/12 for the QIPs from 2018&ndash;2019 and 8.0/12 for the QIPs from 2022&ndash;2023 (Z=3.06, p=0.0005). The median score [25th, 75th percentile] in 2018&ndash;2019 was 4.5 [3.5, 5.13], which increased to 8.5 [7.0, 9.0] in 2022&ndash;2023 [<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>]. The survey response for physician QI leads was 10/13 (76.9%). The most positive response was the QI lead&rsquo;s knowledge and understanding of how to structure a QI project (mean score of 4.4/5); the least positive response was related to departmental focus and clarity regarding QI priorities (mean score of 3.9/5) [<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>].</p><p>Multifaceted physician-led interventions resulted in improvements in the quality and content of medical department QIPs, improved physician knowledge of QI methodology, enhanced focus and clarity around departmental QI priorities, and improved awareness of hospital-wide improvement efforts.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 187 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Change in departmental QIP rubric score pre- and post-intervention</p></caption><link locator="187_F1"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 187 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Mean score on likert scale survey of medical department physician QI leads. Figure Legend: Dots represent mean score; error bars represent range of survey results.</p></caption><link locator="187_F2"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Chan Y-CL, Hsu SH. Target-setting, pay for performance, and quality improvement: a case study of ontario hospitals&rsquo; quality-improvement plans. <I>Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l&rsquo;Administration</I> 2019;<b>36</b>(1):128&ndash;144.</p></li><li><p>Reinertsen J, Gosfield A, Rupp W, Whittington J. <I>Engaging Physicians in a Shared Quality Agenda. IHI Innovation Series white paper.</I> Cambridge, Massachusetts: Institute for Healthcare Improvement;2007.</p></li><li><p>Hayes C, Yousefi V, Wallington T, Ginzburg A. Case study of physician leaders in quality and patient safety, and the development of a physician leadership network. <I>Healthcare Quarterly</I> 2010;<b>13</b>(Sp):68&ndash;73.</p></li><li><p>Fisher E, Berwick D, Davis K. Achieving health care reform--how physicians can help. <I>The New England journal of medicine</I> 2009;<b>360</b>(24):2495&ndash;2497.</p></li><li><p>Pronovost PJ, Miller MR, Wachter RM, Meyer GS. Perspective: physician leadership in quality. <I>Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges</I> 2009;<b>84</b>(12):1651&ndash;1656.</p></li><li><p>McGonigal M, Bauer M, Post C. Physician engagement: a key concept in the journey for quality improvement. <I>Crit Care Nurs Q.</I> 2019;<b>42</b>(2):215&ndash;219.</p></li><li><p>Dhalla IA, Tepper J. Improving the quality of health care in Canada. <I>Canadian Medical Association Journal</I> 2018;<b>190</b>(39):E1162-E1167.</p></li><li><p>Digby GC DS, Hobbs H. Strategies for emerging physician leaders in quality improvement to advance the quality agenda and increase organizational alignment. <I>Physician Leadership Journal</I> 2021;<b>8</b>(4):30&ndash;37.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hobbs, H., Calder-Sprackman, S., Wilkinson, A., Digby, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.187</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.187</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[187 Improving departmental quality improvement plans through standardization, structured peer-to-peer feedback, and building improvement capacity and culture]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A137</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A138</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A140-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[190 Bridging the language gap to provide equal care for every child: a quality improvement initiate for inclusive care in our paediatric emergency department]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A140-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>In Barnet Hospital&rsquo;s paediatric emergency department, we care for a population for whom English is not the first language. During my shifts in the paediatric emergency department, I noticed language barriers impacting care for our children multiple times a day motivating me to address this issue through this quality improvement project. In our busy paediatric emergency department, language is often a barrier to provide great care. When pressed for time we default to English and deny every child the same opportunity. This leads to miscommunication when assessing and providing care for the child and causes increased parental anxiety with re-attendance due to lack of understanding. It ultimately results in poorer outcomes for non-English speaking families.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>To assess the problem, I created a process map to visualise the flow of care for non-English speaking families and developed a fishbone diagram to identify key barriers, such as assumptions about language proficiency, inconsistencies in screening for language needs, limited awareness of interpreting services, and a shortage of cordless phones when requiring interpreting services. Baseline data collection included a staff survey, revealing that 6 out of 10 members of staff had not used interpreting services in the past week despite regularly seeing families with whom they struggled to communicate in English. Using the Model for Improvement framework, I established an aim: by the end of February 2025, interpreting services are offered and used to communicate with 8 out of 10 children and families who require language support (from a baseline of 3 out of 10). I defined measures with clear inclusion and exclusion criteria. I tested interventions through small-scale Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Progress was tracked using a run chart, with baseline and weekly data collection assessing trends. By the end of February 2025, the project successfully met its aim of increasing the use of interpretation services for patients with identified language barriers, as demonstrated in the run chart &ndash; rising from 3/10 at baseline to 8/10 cases in the most recent cycle. The data highlights the impact of structured interventions in raising awareness of the issue and encouraging doctors to utilise interpretation services. This project has demonstrated the effectiveness of simple, structured quality improvement methods in addressing language barriers in paediatric emergency department. Small-scale changes are crucial in driving improvement, but sustaining them requires long-term strategies, particularly with the rotational nature of training doctors. Engaging multiple stakeholders is key to making effective change; however, time and resource constraints remain a challenge.</p><p>The QIC Learn Course and my team&rsquo;s support were instrumental in achieving this project&rsquo;s goals. Through this process, I have gained valuable insights into the impact of targeted interventions and the importance of sustainability in quality improvement. To ensure continued progress, I plan to collaborate with a colleague in the next rotation to maintain and build upon these improvements, ensuring ongoing inclusive care in our paediatric emergency department. Improving communication and care for non-English speaking patients ensures that we ensure all children receive equitable, high-quality care, which is essential in paediatrics and leads to better outcomes for every child. For the healthcare system, these changes will contribute to a more inclusive, efficient, and patient-centred approach to health care.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dhebar, P. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.190</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.190</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[190 Bridging the language gap to provide equal care for every child: a quality improvement initiate for inclusive care in our paediatric emergency department]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A140</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A140</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A140-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[191 A series of audits assessing compliance of patient wristband wearing in a Dublin university hospital]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A140-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Wristbands are essential in identifying patients. They help ensure the appropriate procedures, medications and treatments are administered to the correct patient. This helps to avoid unnecessary and potentially harmful interventions to the wrong patients. All patients should have a laser printed, legible wrist or ankle band with a scannable barcode in situ before receiving care or undergoing any investigation. It should be fit for purpose and not faded or worn.</p></sec><sec><st>Aims</st><p>This series of audits carried out over three consecutive months aims to show an improvement in the standard of compliance of wearing wristbands across all inpatient wards in a Dublin University Hospital. Multiple smaller scale sample audits have been carried out over recent years, however full hospital audits over three given days allows for a more thorough and accurate study of compliance.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The data was collected through filling out a structured questionnaire from three single day audits carried out in January, February and March 2024. The inclusion criteria included medical, surgical, day-care and Emergency Department patients, with a total of 32 wards. The psychiatry, endoscopy day cases and patients that were not on the ward during review were excluded. Each patient was asked about the presence of the correct wristband and if it had been removed further questions were asked. These questions included who, when and the reason for removal and had they had any administration of medications or procedures since wristband removal. For any damaged or missing wristbands the clinical nurse managers were notified for rectification. This data was all compiled on an Excel document and compared to previous sample audits and to each consecutive monthly sample. The collected and interpreted figures were presented at the local audit meeting, which involved the Quality and Safety team within the hospital. Results of the audit were shared to the departments and wards included in the study.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 1,645 patients were assessed for wristband compliance over 3 separate days. The highest level of compliance with a correctly identified wristband was in the 3rd month, March at 93.1% (<cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>). The first audit of the year in January held the highest rate of wristbands that were unsuitable for use at 5.6%. The factors that deemed the wristbands unsuitable included faded or illegible data, incorrect patient information and physical wearing of the wristband. There was a reduction in the number of patients without any wristbands from 6.7% in January to 5.5% in March (<cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>). For those without a wristband, the most common length of time without a wristband was in excess of 24 hours. The leading causes for the removal of the band were it had fallen off, unknown or patient confusion and patient choice. The patients were the most likely individual to remove the wristbands. Of note, a number of patients with altered mental status were found to have a wristband on the bedside instead of on their person.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 191 Table 1</no><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>January (T1)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>February (T2)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>March (T3)</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="4" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Population </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">540 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">551 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">554 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Usable ID band in situ </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">476 (88.2%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">506 (91.8%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">516 (93.1%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Unusable ID band in situ </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">28 (5.6%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">13 (2.4%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">8 (1.4%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">No ID band in situ </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">36 (6.7%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">32 (5.8%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">30 (5.5%) </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Wristband compliance and its importance has been raised repeatedly over time internationally including in the World Health Organisation &lsquo;Surgical Safety Checklist&rsquo;<sup>1</sup> in 2009 and National Health Service of the United Kingdom&rsquo;s National Patient Safety Agency &lsquo;Alerts for Never Events&rsquo;<sup>2</sup> in 2018. In our study, compliance ranged from 88.2% to 93.1%, this falls short of the ideal 100% compliance. On average approximately 10% of patients were found without appropriate identification on a given day. This is a significant finding as it reflects a shortfall in patient safety. An unidentified patient is more susceptible to medication and intervention errors which could have a detrimental impact on their health and incur unnecessary costs to the hospital. Patients could go missing on or off hospital grounds, and without adequate identification, they are susceptible to adverse outcomes.</p><p>Limitations and difficulties of the study include varying levels of staff and patient engagement, the lack of a clear definition of a &lsquo;legible wristband&rsquo;, discrepancy between data collectors and time consuming data collection.</p><p>Education on wristband compliance should be essential on every ward to both staff and patients alike. On admission, the patient should be communicated the importance of wearing their wristband and advised how to seek a replacement should their band get lost or damaged. Similarly, the importance of patient identification should be reiterated to staff regularly, as well as ensuring there are no administrative obstacles to supply including stocking of working printers. All staff should be reminded regularly to check wristbands before discussing patient sensitive information, before every procedure and before administering medication. A nominated person on each ward should be tasked with ensuring daily compliance and wristband functionality every morning. This could be any member of the healthcare force including students, nurses and healthcare assistants. These proposed changes can be implemented immediately and shouldn&rsquo;t majorly increase the current workload of staff. We anticipate a reduction in the misidentification of patients which will reduce patient harm. We saw an increased awareness amongst staff of the importance of wristband wearing throughout the three separate days of data collection and we would hope this would continue to increase if it were a part of daily routine.</p><p>In conclusion, in order to minimise patient harm and increase patient safety, we must aim for wristband compliance to be 100% on our hospital wards. We believe the key to achieving this is; hospital population education and reducing administrative obstacles.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>WHO Guidelines for Safe Surgery 2009: Safe Surgery Saves Lives. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009. Available from: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK143243/</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>NHS England Never Events List 2018. NHS Improvement 2018. Available from <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/2018-Never-Events-List-updated-February-2021.pdf</inter-ref>  </p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Springael, M., Ilyinski, A., Callanan, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.191</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.191</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[191 A series of audits assessing compliance of patient wristband wearing in a Dublin university hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A140</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A141</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A142-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[193 Whats going on? Improving neonatal ward round entries]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A142-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The setting of this project is a busy Local Neonatal Unit in South London, United Kingdom. The unit provides multi-disciplinary care for babies born preterm or unwell. Some may be on the unit for a short time, whilst others may be admitted for several weeks, depending on clinical need and complexity. The team on ward round consists of consultants, resident doctors, nursing staff and allied health professionals, with entries written by resident doctors and read and acted upon by all members of the team.</p><p>Evidence shows that clear, accurate and up-to-date documentation is vital to improve patient safety, efficiency and staff and patient experience.<sup>1 2</sup>  </p><p>It was identified that ward round entries on the neonatal unit were often messy. What mattered was hidden amongst outdated or irrelevant information. This risked inaccuracies, stress for staff and the team missing important things for our babies.</p><p>The project&rsquo;s aim was to increase the number of neonatal ward round entries that were easy to read from 2-out-of-10 in May 2024 to 7-out-of-10 by the end of August 2024, using a scale of &lsquo;ease of understanding&rsquo; for each entry.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>I used the Model for ImMprovement<sup>1</sup> to guide my work throughout. I conducted the diagnostic phase using observation and reflection to analyse the impacts of various factors within the process, and created a high-level process map.</p><p>Change ideas were tested using Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. The first test was to provide a reminder via WhatsApp group to resident doctors to review each entry prior to signing. The second and third interventions were to create and implement a new ward round proforma. I used recognised subheadings, adapted it following feedback, then uploaded it to the patient record system.</p><p>Data on ease of understanding were collected regularly via retrospective electronic notes review.</p></sec><sec><st>Results and Conclusion</st><p>I achieved an improvement in quality of entries, with 6-out-of-10 easy to understand by August 2024. The first test had limited success, but the second and third interventions led to a statistically significant &lsquo;run&rsquo; from points 34&ndash;50, as demonstrated on the run chart. The proforma remains in use.</p><p>Additional influencing factors in this project included time, space and equipment, as well as increasing experience of staff on the unit over time.</p><p>My key learning points were the importance of diagnostics in quality improvement, involvement of the multidisciplinary team and parents, and the power of using available resources to enact meaningful change.</p></sec><sec><st>Acknowledgements</st><p>Nikki Davey and Lukas Karafiol</p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>QIC Learn. URL: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://qiclearn.com/</inter-ref>. Accessed 23 March 2025.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jones, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.193</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.193</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[193 Whats going on? Improving neonatal ward round entries]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A142</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A142</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A142-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[194 No pain, real gain - empowering patients with local anaesthetic for IUD procedures]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A142-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Context</st><p>This Quality Improvement Project (QIP) was conducted at Swindon Sexual Health Centre (SSHC), to improve patients&lsquo; experiences with intrauterine contraception (IUC). Swindon, with a median age of 39,<sup>1</sup> serves a slightly younger demographic for IUC, with an average patient age of 33. Most patients receiving IUC at SSHC were multiparous.</p><p>The team involved four medical students, two education fellows, and a sexual health consultant. Involving practice managers, administrative personnel, and clinicians trained to fit intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCDs), was crucial to fully understanding the patients&rsquo; experience accessing the service.</p></sec><sec><st>Problem</st><p>Intrauterine birth control is a reliable and cost-effective contraceptive.<sup>2</sup> Despite this, the number of patients opting for IUCs has stagnated.<sup>3</sup> Studies demonstrate a correlation between anticipated and actual pain during coil insertion.<sup>4</sup> Misconceptions about IUCDs persist, such as the belief that local anaesthetic (LA) is not routinely offered or effective,<sup>5</sup> discouraging patients from seeking IUCDs and fostering mistrust between service providers and users.</p><p>Assessment of Problem and Analysis of its Causes</p><p>To address the issue, the team conducted internal surveys of clinicians trained in fitting IUCs, patient surveys on their IUC experiences, and an audit of coil-fitting procedures over two months. This helped assess patient-reported discomfort and identify realistic and helpful interventions within the six-month project timeline. Based on feedback, we developed an informational leaflet. This resource was familiar to staff and well-received when communicated via email.</p></sec><sec><st>Intervention</st><p>A comprehensive leaflet was introduced to bridge the gap in patient education on local anaesthetic options, featuring diagrams for clarity. The leaflet was shared via text message links before appointments, placed in the clinic&rsquo;s waiting room, and uploaded to the NHS trust&rsquo;s website, with plans to add translation features for inclusivity.</p></sec><sec><st>Strategy for Change</st><p>Pre-intervention, 20% of patients reported moderate/severe pain, but only 9.26% of these used local anaesthetic. Staff and patient feedback highlighted the need for a patient-friendly resource, guiding the leaflet&rsquo;s development. Implementation was delayed by NHS committee approvals, third-party provider issues with intranet uploads, and difficulty adding the leaflet to text reminders.</p></sec><sec><st>Measurement of Improvement</st><p>Feedback was collected through pre and post-intervention patient and staff surveys, evaluating its impact on understanding, satisfaction, and LA uptake. A repeat audit of coil-fitting procedures demonstrated increased LA use from 90.7% to 100% in IUCD insertion procedures, with 21.5% of procedures using a combination of all three LA options. Pain scores also improved, with 92.9% of post-intervention cases reporting mild pain compared to 59.2% pre-intervention. Although there was a noticeable increase in anaesthetic uptake and a decrease in severe pain scores, more data is needed to draw conclusive results.</p><p>Involving Patients, Carers, or Family Members in the Project</p><p>Patients contributed through questionnaires and opportunistic interviews during consultations to assess the leaflet&rsquo;s readability and clarity of visual aids. Staff input from the admin team, coil fitters and nurses was also gathered to evaluate the leaflet&rsquo;s content and its impact on patient care.</p></sec><sec><st>Effects of Changes</st><p>Our leaflet significantly enhanced patient awareness and clinician engagement with pain management for IUC procedures. Increased LA uptake and reduced pain and anxiety levels indicate that we empowered patients to make informed decisions about pain relief. Qualitative feedback highlighted the leaflet&rsquo;s effectiveness in addressing misconceptions and providing reassurance. The intervention successfully resolved the initial problem of patient education gaps, with all patients who received the leaflet reporting it as useful. However, challenges included implementation delays and inconsistent patient engagement.</p></sec><sec><st>Lessons Learned</st><p>Early engagement with administrative teams would have prevented delays. Ensuring multiple avenues for patient feedback and education maximised our reach and effectiveness. The importance of staff training in advanced LA techniques became evident; future iterations would benefit from improved dissemination strategies and addressing procedural barriers. The project underscored the value of a multi-faceted approach to implementing change, considering patient and staff needs throughout the process.</p></sec><sec><st>Messages for Others</st><p>This project demonstrates the potential of well-designed patient education materials to improve engagement and outcomes in reproductive health procedures. Simple interventions can have far-reaching effects on patient care and clinical practice. It has broader applications in healthcare, potentially improving system efficiency through better-preparing patients. The project has potential for application across procedures in other areas of reproductive health, contributing to improving patient experiences and pain management. Refining and expanding such initiatives could substantially improve patient care across specialities.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Office for National Statistics. How Life Has Changed in Swindon: Census 2021 [Internet]. Ons.gov.uk. 2021 [cited 2024 Oct 8]. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/visualisations/censusareachanges/E06000030</p></li><li><p>Wilkinson C, Glasier A, Barton S, Elliman A, Mancey-Jones S, Mehigan S, Rowlands S, Ward S, Howarth J, Whitehead S, Dougherty M, Mugglestone M, Kwan I, Corkett M, Bancsi A, Douglas H-R, Mavranezouli I. (2005, October 5). Long-acting reversible contraception: the effective and appropriate use of long-acting reversible contraception. <I>National Centre for Biotechnology Information.</I> Retrieved February 12, 2024, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK51051/</p></li><li><p>Lifestyles team, Health and Social Care Information Centre. (2014, October 30). NHS contraceptive services: England, community contraceptive clinics. <I>Office for National Statistics.</I> Retrieved February 12, 2024, from https://files.digital.nhs.uk/publicationimport/pub15xxx/pub15746/nhs-cont-serv-comm-cont-clin-eng-13-14-rep.pdf</p></li><li><p>Murty J. Use and effectiveness of oral analgesia when fitting an intrauterine device. <I>Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care</I> 2003;<b>29</b>(3):150&ndash;151. doi:10.1783/147118903101197539.</p></li><li><p>Taghinejadi N, van der Westhuizen HM, Ifeanyi Ayomoh F, Ahmed W, Greenhalgh T, Boylan AM. Pain Experiences during Intrauterine Device procedures: a Thematic Analysis of Tweets. <I>BMJ Sexual &amp; Reproductive Health</I> [Internet]. 2024 Jun 11 [cited 2024 Oct 8];50(4):bmjsrh-202011. Available from: https://srh.bmj.com/content/early/2024/06/11/bmjsrh-2023-202011</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burity, P. L., Ahmed, S., Medhi, M., Simkin, L., Westwick, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.194</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.194</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[194 No pain, real gain - empowering patients with local anaesthetic for IUD procedures]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A142</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A143</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A146-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[196 Individualised care plans for frail patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A146-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Bundle care plans have been developed for time critical emergency abdominal conditions as a national standard in Denmark.<sup>1</sup> These types of guidelines are, however, a &lsquo;one size fits all&rsquo;. As a result, some patients enrolled in bundle care plans may experience fruitless and even harmful treatment. There is a growing emphasis on reducing unnecessary and potentially harmful treatment, as evidenced by the growing Choosing Wisely campaign.<sup>2</sup>  </p><p>Traditionally, surgeons decide whether or not to operate, and anesthetists decide whether or not to anaesthetise. However, patients, especially frail patients, may benefit from a multidisciplinary approach to decision making prior to operation in emergency abdominal disease as shown in England by the NELA-campaign.<sup>3</sup> In this abstract we present the first audits of the implementation of our multidisciplinary approach for frail patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>For frail patients,<sup>4</sup> we decided to create ad hoc multidisciplinary team conferences between on-calls from the surgical, anaesthetic and intensive care departments to discuss possible plans and outcomes before presenting the best option(s) for the patients. We have started regular morbidity and mortality (M&amp;M) meetings for both surgical, anaesthetic and intensive care doctors, to go through cases to learn from them. An audit was made from September through December 2024 for patients undergoing a CT scan within the emergency abdominal surgery protocol.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We have had two M&amp;M meetings with fruitful discussions. There has been at least five multidisciplinary conferences. From the audit, we learned that most patients were not scored according to CFS score, WHO performance score or NELA score. Most patients did not have an active decision about level of care prior to surgery. None of the patients in the audit had a multidisciplinary conference prior to surgery, although almost half may have met the criteria for it. The discrepancy between the audit and experience with regards to number of multidisciplinary conferences, is probably caused by not all CT scans being done within the protocol for emergency abdominal surgery in addition to well-known problems with implementing new clinical pathwa</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Region Sj&aelig;lland, 2023. Afsluttende rapport LKT Akut kirurgi endelig. Accessed on 23rd of March 2025 at <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://kvalitetsteams.dk/media/kv1nwfbt/afsluttende-rapport-lkt-akut-kirurgi-endelig.pdf</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Wendy Levinson, Marjon Kallewaard, R Sacha Bhatia, Daniel Wolfson, Sam Shortt, Eve A Kerr. Choosing wisely international working group. &lsquo;choosing wisely&rsquo;: a growing international campaign. <I>BMJ Qual Saf</I>. 2015 Feb;<b>24</b>(2):167&ndash;74.</p></li><li><p>Royal College of Surgeons, 2018. The High-Risk General Surgical Patient: Raising the Standard. Accessed on 23rd of March 2025 at https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/-/media/files/rcs/news-and-events/media-centre/2018-press-releases-documents/rcs-report-the-highrisk-general-surgical-patient--raising-the-standard--december-2018.pdf</p></li><li><p>Defined as having Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) Score &ge;6, World Health Organization (WHO) performance score &ge;3, living in a 24-hour care facility or with massive care provided at home, with profound comorbidity, or with a National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) risk score &gt;10%.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Krogh, B. M., Madsen, M. T., Ru&#x0308;tz, K., Mortensen, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.196</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.196</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[196 Individualised care plans for frail patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A146</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A146</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A146-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[197 Get the steroids in, quick!]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A146-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>National guidelines have advised for systemic steroids to be administered to children &ge;6 years old with moderate to severe asthma exacerbations, within the first hour of arriving to the Accident and Emergency department.<sup>1</sup> However, local data showed an average administration time of 100 minutes. The delay in administrating systemic steroids can lead to prolonged hospital stays, missed school days, increased family stress and higher healthcare costs.<sup>2</sup> The aim of this Quality Improvement Project is to reduce the time taken for steroids administration to less than 60 minutes, in line with national guidelines.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>I collected weekly data from September 2023 to March 2024 from the hospital data team. With weekly data I was able to establish a baseline showing the normal variation in time taken from A&amp;E attendance to systemic steroid administration. Within the six months, I implemented nine PDSA (plan-do-study-act) cycles, which included involving stakeholders such as paediatric and A&amp;E QI lead, doctors, nurses, as well as incorporating teaching sessions, poster campaigns, designing of new screening tool guide for newer or junior A&amp;E doctors. The results were recorded on a run chart and in an excel sheet.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The time taken for systemic steroid administration improved from 150 minutes at week 1, to 50 minutes by week 28. The response time fell and remained below the median baseline, indicating a statistically significant change that was sustained for over four months. This project demonstrated that with targeted education, staff engagement, cross-team collaboration, and caregiver involvement, acute asthma care in our hospital can be significantly improved.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>British Thoracic Society. British guideline on the management of asthma July 2019 [Available from: BTS_SIGN%20Asthma%20Guideline%202014%20(2).pdf.</p></li><li><p>Bhogal SK, McGillivray D, Bourbeau J, Benedetti A, Bartlett S, Ducharme FM. Early administration of systemic corticosteroids reduces hospital admission rates for children with moderate and severe asthma exacerbation. <I>Ann Emerg Med</I>. 2012;<b>60</b>(1):84&ndash;91.e3.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tan, L. E., Howley, N., Rothenberg, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.197</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.197</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[197 Get the steroids in, quick!]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A146</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A146</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A151-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[199 BC cancer quality improvement project: translating printed patient education pamphlets to audio-visual digital resources]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A151-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The mainstay for patient education materials in radiation oncology has traditionally been written pamphlets. With improvements in technology, more audio-visual resources are now used to support patient education. The goal of this project is to improve patient education in radiation oncology through the implementation of newer technology. Specifically, we hope to assess the efficacy of animated videos in supporting breast cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy compared to paper pamphlets.</p></sec><sec><st>Methodology</st><p>Information from the paper pamphlets traditionally used for patient education were consulted to create an animation video with a Voiceover narrative that illustrates educational materials related to radiotherapy. 40 patients recommended to receive adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer were recruited and presented with both the paper pamphlet and animation video. Surveys were administered and the results were reported descriptively, including basic demographic information, thoughts on the education materials provided, and preferences between the two modalities.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Results from this study show that both educational materials seem easy to review and are of good length. When comparing the two educational modalities, more participants reported being &lsquo;very comfortable&rsquo; with the upcoming treatment after watching the video, and more participants reported being &lsquo;very confident&rsquo; in remembering the information presented.</p><p>In terms of patient preferences between the two modalities, most participants preferred either the video by itself or both the video and paper pamphlet combined. However, a significant portion of participants preferred the paper pamphlet alone, especially those who were shown the paper pamphlet before the video. Furthermore, after viewing both educational materials, patients report more positive emotions like relief, calmness, and confidence, in contrast to the mixed emotions felt before viewing the materials.</p><p>Overall, the animation video created in this project seem to support patient comfort and confidence when undergoing radiation therapy for breast cancer. However, both paper pamphlets and animation videos seem to be useful for patient education, and a combination of both could be implemented for optimal effectiveness. Overall, by implementing evidence-based programs, the results from this quality improvement project will change the patient education pathway in radiation oncology and lead to improvements in patient health outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Acknowledgement</st><p>We would like to thank the British Columbia Provincial Health Services Authorities for funding this study under the Health System Redesign Funding.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guo, I., Lin, A., Campbell, J., Atrchian, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.199</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.199</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[199 BC cancer quality improvement project: translating printed patient education pamphlets to audio-visual digital resources]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A151</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A151</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A151-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[200 Quality and safety in health services: an experience of person-centered care and multidisciplinary work by high-performance teams, in a public health service in the municipality of sao sebastiao, Brazil]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A151-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>To enhance the patient experience, healthcare quality and safety are achieved by balancing the benefits and risks of services. Our initial evaluation revealed that rigid, disease-focused protocols were ineffective for monitoring patients. As a result, we adopted a person- and family-centered care model, supported by an internal workflow that ensures comprehensive management of health needs. Our service prioritizes quality and safety over mere cure or rehabilitation and addresses conditions such as neurological sequelae from stroke, neurodegenerative diseases, various oncological challenges, ostomies, and palliative care needs. Delivering quality, safe, and person-centered care through multidisciplinary teamwork is essential, and this paper shares our experience of continuous improvement despite the challenges posed by Brazil&rsquo;s Unified Health System (UHS).</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The initial step for patients and their families at the Municipal Rehabilitation Center involves a multidisciplinary screening. This assessment, conducted by a team of healthcare professionals from various fields, aims to identify individual health needs. Based on these findings, a Singular Therapeutic Project (STP) is created. The STP is a personalized treatment plan that respects patient autonomy while focusing on providing high-quality and safe care. It outlines specific goals and clearly defines the responsibilities of both the healthcare team and the patient and their family. The STP is regularly reviewed and updated to ensure it aligns with the patient&lsquo;s evolving needs, incorporates caregiver support, adheres to current therapeutic guidelines, and includes preventive measures to address potential health concerns.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A patient-centered approach&mdash;prioritizing individual needs over rigid protocols&mdash;is crucial for ensuring quality and safety. During periodic reviews and before discharge, we assess patient and family satisfaction, well-being, and the achievement of STP goals, including motor, neurological, and other rehabilitative targets. Feedback has been overwhelmingly positive, with patients and families emphasizing that they feel cared for as individuals rather than merely as disease carriers. As a result, we have observed stabilization or improvement in pre-existing conditions, strengthened family relationships, reduction of new complications, enhanced overall quality of life and health perceptions, and reductions in iatrogenesis, insecurity, and treatment non-adherence.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Delpupo Froede, T. A. S., Santos, A. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.200</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.200</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[200 Quality and safety in health services: an experience of person-centered care and multidisciplinary work by high-performance teams, in a public health service in the municipality of sao sebastiao, Brazil]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A151</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A151</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A152-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[201 The business model of quality improvement and drivers of success of a private tertiary hospital in Lagos, Nigeria]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A152-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Over the years, Subol Hospital in Lagos, Nigeria, significantly improved its quality of care as measured with SafeCare standards. This study explores the business model and practices underlying this success and the potential implications for the hospital business and finances, to provide lessons for similar healthcare providers in Africa.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We conducted a mixed methods study with data collected in 2019. First, we extracted from hospital records quantitative data related to finances, service delivery, and human resources. Additionally, we performed semi-structured interviews with 30 individuals in and around the hospital at the executive management, clinical, administrative, patient and community levels in August 2019. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics while qualitative data were analyzed thematically.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Over the period of study, the hospital recorded improvements in quality standards, driven by deliberate and sustained investments in QI. Supported by a clear organisational structure and technology, Subol Hospital operates a business model &ndash; including no bank loans policy and regular capital reserve and investment scheme &ndash; which guarantees financial buoyancy for investments in QI initiatives. The quality improvement was accompanied by a reduction in annual deaths in the hospital, increased revenues, and empanelment in 40 health maintenance organizations, and 60% of the patients were insured. Clients identified high-quality diagnostics and treatment services, and the professionalism the staff members as a key reason for patronising Subol Hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Subol Hospital demonstrated a consistent and substantial improvement in QI scores and patient outcomes, paralleled by growth in the clientele base and revenues. This case indicates that beyond direct health benefits to clients, organisations could earn economic rewards from investments in QI.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ifeanyichi, M., Shobiye, H. O., Rinke de Wit, T. F., Dada, I., Bouma, T., Bello, O., Mbam, U., Spieker, N., Gomez-Perez, G. P., Graaff, A. d.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.201</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.201</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[201 The business model of quality improvement and drivers of success of a private tertiary hospital in Lagos, Nigeria]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A152</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A152</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A152-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[202 Lean methodology in therapies: co-designing efficiency improvements with patients and staff in NHS acute hospital]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A152-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The increasing demand for healthcare services requires continuous improvement in efficiency and resource management. The Therapies Department at King&rsquo;s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust faced financial challenges and operational inefficiencies that needed urgent attention.</p><p>To address these issues, the department launched a collaborative innovation initiative aimed at optimising resources while maintaining high-quality patient care. This programme aligned with the NHS Long Term Plan,<sup>1</sup> emphasising efficiency improvements in healthcare services.</p><p>Using a Lean approach, the initiative actively involved staff, patients, and carers in identifying inefficiencies and co-designing solutions. A series of &lsquo;Waste&rsquo; Workshops<sup>2</sup> were conducted to generate ideas for improving service delivery, reducing costs, and streamlining operations.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The team used a structured Lean<sup>3</sup> approach to engage staff, patients, and carers in identifying inefficiencies and improving service delivery. The main methodology included:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>&lsquo;Waste&rsquo; Workshops</p><p><l type="letter"><li><p>A series of eight face-to-face workshops facilitated by the Quality Improvement (QI) team.</p></li><li><p>Used the TIMWOODS (Transportation, Inventory, Motion, Waiting, Overprocessing, Overproduction, Defects, Skills) framework to identify different types of waste (e.g., waiting time, overprocessing, duplication).</p></li><li><p>Staff, patients, and carers collaborated to generate efficiency ideas.</p></li><li><p>Each workshop lasted 2.5 hours and was designed for collaborative brainstorming.</p></li></l></p></li><li><p>Data Collection</p><p><l type="letter"><li><p>Baseline data was sourced from the Model Health System<sup>4</sup> and NHS Workforce Intelligence Portal<sup>5</sup> to understand current inefficiencies.</p></li><li><p>Workshop discussions were guided by real-time data insights.</p></li></l></p></li><li><p>Implementation of Ideas</p><p><l type="letter"><li><p>Ideas were categorised into:</p><p>i. Quick Wins (immediate, low-cost solutions)</p><p>ii. Innovative Projects (long-term initiatives)</p><p>iii. Trust-wide Ideas (system-wide strategies)</p></li><li><p>Staff and patients participated in voting to prioritise projects.</p></li></l></p></li><li><p>Governance &amp; Communication</p><p><l type="letter"><li><p>A governance structure was set up to oversee implementation. <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">Figure 1</cross-ref></p></li><li><p>Regular digital newsletters updated stakeholders on progress.</p></li></l></p></li></l></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 202 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Therapies innovation &amp; efficiency improvement programme governance</p></caption><link locator="202_F1"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Participation &amp; Engagement</p><p><l type="letter"><li><p>17% of Therapies staff participated.</p></li><li><p>14 patients and carers actively contributed.</p></li><li><p>Over 800 ideas were generated:</p><p>i. 5% Quick Wins</p><p>ii. 65% Innovative Projects</p><p>iii. 30% Trust-wide Ideas</p></li></l></p></li><li><p>These ideas underwent a thematic review process and were categorised into quick wins, proposed projects, and trust-wide initiatives. From this analysis, five key workstreams were identified to enhance efficiency, communication, and patient care:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Promoting Self-Management through the Patient Entertainment System, utilising digital tools to empower patients in their rehabilitation.</p></li><li><p>Standardising Job Planning Processes to ensure consistency, fairness, and efficiency in workload distribution.</p></li><li><p>Clarifying and Defining Job Roles to maximise skill utilisation and create structured career development opportunities.</p></li><li><p>Improving Patient Waiting List Communication to enhance transparency and streamline service delivery.</p></li><li><p>Optimising Denmark Hill OT/PT Inpatient Neuro Rehab Pathways to improve rehabilitation services and patient outcomes.</p></li></l></p></li><li><p>Financial Impact</p><p><l type="letter"><li><p>&pound;18,844 saved through Quick Wins.</p></li><li><p>&pound;951,000 in projected savings from larger initiatives.</p></li><li><p>Target: &pound;1 million savings by June 2024.</p></li></l></p></li><li><p>Challenges Identified</p><p><l type="letter"><li><p>Difficulty in engaging all staff due to clinical commitments.</p></li><li><p>Logistical issues (e.g., finding accessible venues for all participants).</p></li><li><p>Ensuring a balanced representation of patients and carers.</p></li></l></p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The Therapies Lean Programme successfully demonstrated the impact of collaborative innovation in healthcare. By engaging staff, patients, and carers, the initiative:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Identified inefficiencies and provided actionable solutions.</p></li><li><p>Enhanced teamwork and cross-disciplinary collaboration.</p></li><li><p>Generated significant cost savings, contributing to NHS efficiency goals.</p></li><li><p>Served as a model for expansion, with other departments (e.g., Dietetics) now adopting similar methods.</p></li></l></p><p>Going forward, the programme emphasises sustainability by:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Integrating quality improvement training for staff and patients.</p></li><li><p>Maintaining ongoing governance and oversight.</p></li><li><p>Expanding Lean methodologies across other healthcare departments.</p></li></l></p><p>This approach ensures long-term impact, fostering a culture of continuous improvement within the NHS. For further details about this approach refer to the case study <I>Collaborative Innovation Engaging Patients, Carers, and Staff to Enhance Efficiency in Therapies Department.</I>  <sup>6</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>NHS Long Term Plan: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">NHS Long Term Plan</inter-ref>.</p></li><li><p>&lsquo;Waste&rsquo; workshop: a Lean workshop that provides a safe space for staff, patients, and carers to identify inefficient actions and processes with potential innovative ideas to improve. &lsquo;Waste&rsquo; workshops were also referred as &lsquo;Innovation and Efficiency&rsquo;.</p></li><li><p>Lean: Creating a system in which all employees in the organisation are empowered to collect and measure data, and to create their own &mdash; and not a certified consultant&rsquo;s &mdash; improvement ideas. Lean in Healthcare: Creating value and reducing burdens that patients and staff experience every day. Virginia Mason Institute, last accessed August 2024.</p></li><li><p>https://www.england.nhs.uk/applications/model-hospital/</p></li><li><p>https://www.hee.nhs.uk/our-work/workforce-planning-intelligence</p></li><li><p><inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://content.govdelivery.com/attachments/UKKCHFTNHS/2024/08/07/file_attachments/2959539/Case%20Study_Collaborative%20Innovation_Engaging%20Patients,%20Carers,%20and%20Staff%20to%20Enhance%20Efficiency%20in%20Therapies%20Department.pdf</inter-ref>  </p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cortes Beltran, A. X., Levy, C. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.202</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.202</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[202 Lean methodology in therapies: co-designing efficiency improvements with patients and staff in NHS acute hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A152</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A153</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A154-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[204 Developing a measure of safety at the transition from inpatient mental health care to community (MoSaT), from a service user and carer perspective]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A154-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The immediate period following discharge from inpatient mental health care is a critical time for the safety of service users, with around 16% of service users readmitted within just 30 days of discharge. Service-led processes and interventions designed to improve the transition from inpatient to community care are often evaluated using readmission, self-harm, and suicide rates, which can overlook the challenges that service users face during this time. The use of service user reported measures to influence change in healthcare can positively impact organisational performance and improve patient-centred care. No measure currently exists that is able to assess the experience and safety of service users at this care transition. This research aimed to develop a service user reported measure of safety at the transition from acute adult inpatient mental health care to community settings (MoSaT), from a service user and carer perspective.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We combined findings from a scoping review and a qualitative interview study to develop core components of safety at the care transition. These core components formed the measurement domains. The questionnaire items were then developed and revised by two stakeholder involvement groups involving service users, carers, mental health care professionals and researchers. Face validity of the measure was tested through a think-aloud process with service users. A patient and public involvement and engagement group advised throughout each stage of the process.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Seven core components of safety were identified: 1) preparation for transfer of care, 2) crisis and deterioration, 3) feeling ready at discharge, 4) feeling safe after discharge, 5) supporting my health in the community, 6) adapting to life post-discharge, 7) medication management. Initially, 221 items were developed. These were grouped, refined and reduced to 28 experience items and 6 additional outcome items. Think-aloud interviews demonstrated good face validity of the measure content, but slight changes to item wording were made.</p><p>Next steps involve evaluating the reliability and validity of the measurement properties.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich, J., Armitage, G., Keyworth, C., Lawton, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.204</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.204</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[204 Developing a measure of safety at the transition from inpatient mental health care to community (MoSaT), from a service user and carer perspective]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A154</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A154</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A154-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[205 Documentation and dashboard driven quality and safety improvement in interpreter services for limited English proficient patients]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A154-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>This poster discusses a quality improvement team&rsquo;s experience in implementing a Joint Commission regulatory standard for documentation of interpreter services utilization for patients who have Limited English Proficiency (LEP) at an academic health system in New England. This project specifically discusses the process of implementing a standardized process from a state of non-uniform documentation to mandatory documentation across all ambulatory health system settings.</p></sec><sec><st>Background</st><p>Patients that are designated to have Limited English Proficiency (LEP) status experience numerous challenges associated with their healthcare. LEP is recognized as an independent driver of disparities in access to healthcare, quality and outcomes of healthcare among LEP patients. Utilization of qualified medical interpreters when communicating with and providing care for LEP patients bridges these gaps of inequity. Professional language interpreters are available to hospital systems across various modalities, onsite, as well as remotely by video or audio. However methodical use of qualified medical interpreters for every encounter remains a challenge for hospitals and health systems. Known reasons for this include the use of family and friends to &lsquo;interpret&rsquo;, or providers using untested language skills to communicate with patients, and other reasons.</p><p>Without rigorous documentation of utilization of interpreter services, addressing many of these gaps will be challenging. In 2023, The Joint Commission for Accreditation of Health Care Organizations (The Joint Commission), provided recommendations to Dartmouth Health&rsquo;s ambulatory clinics regarding documentation of interpreter use. This recommendation, combined with the above existing need to address gaps set the conditions for candidacy to participate in a Learning Health System Collaborative at a New England health system.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This project was a part of a larger learning collaborative that consisted of 14 teams across the Dartmouth Health system working on efforts that impact care experience. The quality improvement framework used throughout the collaborative and on this individual project was The Lean Six Sigma method. As part of this method, The DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) steps were used to move through phases of the project. This project and learning collaborative launched in December 2023 and the documentation system is in the early phases of our final scaling step across the health system.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Before implementation of our mandatory documentation of interpreter utilization, the Dartmouth Health system had an overall documentation rate of 14% in December 2023 based on an electronic medical record (EMR) data collection form that was piloted in Nashua General Internal Medicine (GIM). After piloting the initial data collection form in Nashua GIM, the project team conducted focus groups with users completing the new mandatory process.</p><p>Focus group feedback was largely positive or neutral with various respondents confirming that completion of the form did not burden staff or providers. Voice of the customer feedback from the focus groups indicated that there may be improvements that could be made to the data collection form itself to help better capture all types of encounters. After conducting the initial pilot, all aggregated data on the LEP Interpreter Services dashboard (visualized through Tableau) was manually reviewed to determine the top reasons for data form errors. Results from this analysis demonstrated that errors associated with interpreter assigned IDs were often the source of data errors along with missing information.</p></sec><sec><st>Discussion</st><p>This data driven implementation effort has resulted in an increase in documentation from a baseline of 14% across the system to over 90% as of completion of the Define and Measure phases, thus without any rigorous analysis. The initially stated goals included increasing the documentation rate to at least 50%. This has been achieved and exceeded at the initial site of implementation. As this work formally transitions into the Improve and Control phases of the DMAIC process and the documentations efforts are scaled cross the Dartmouth Health system, more focus groups will be conducted in order to ensure that documentation efforts are sustained.</p><p>At the conclusion of this work, the Dartmouth Health system will have a mandatory system for documenting all ambulatory interactions with interpreter services. Future work could include similar models for implementing documentation of interpreter services during inpatient encounters or hospital encounters.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>*** Our references will cite papers, but also DH data sources from our internal Epic, e-DH, as well as data analysis from our Analytics and Reporting Team</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verkhovsky, S., Dillehay, R., Friedman, H., Bohm, A., Welshman, D., Morong, A., Racine, A., Karthikeyan, V., Oliver, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.205</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.205</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[205 Documentation and dashboard driven quality and safety improvement in interpreter services for limited English proficient patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A154</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A155</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A156-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[207 The impact of establishing a comprehensive stop smoking service at a primary healthcare setting in the quit attempts: a quality improvement project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A156-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>In 2005, Oman joined the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control ( WHO FCTC) to minimize tobacco consumption (WHO, 2020). Countries ratifying the FCTC are mandated to offer tobacco cessation service at its best practice, which includes tobacco cessation medications, counselling, and a toll-free Quitline (WHO, 2013). Current epidemiological data revealed that Oman lacks a national tobacco cessation program that meets the WHO FCTC minimal standards. The trend of tobacco use is on the rise (8.0%) and is attributable to 8.7% of deaths in Oman (Salma and Paul, 2023). This study aims to analyse the impact of establishing a tobacco cessation service at North Al-Khuwair Health Center (NKHC) at its best practice approach in the quit attempt of tobacco users.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A quality improvement initiative was carried out at NKHC using the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycle to establish a tobacco cessation service at its best practice. The study population was tobacco users of all age groups who attended NKHC from July 2024 to March 2025. Brief advice was provided as general practice at each clinical encounter. Tobacco users who expressed their readiness to quit were evaluated at a stop smoking clinic and were given free tobacco cessation support (behavioural and nicotine replacement therapy). All patients were followed up with a blended approach (in person and by phone) for a total of three months. The outcome of interest was a quit attempt. Descriptive analysis (n,%) was carried out using SPSS version 27.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Prior to July 2024, the tobacco cessation service was not operational at NKHC. A total of 30 tobacco users visited the stop smoking clinic from July 2024 to March 2025. More than half (n=17, 56.7%) were over the age of 40. Almost one in five (n=5, 16.7%) of tobacco users were under the age of 18. Most tobacco users were males (n=29, 96.7%), married (n=23, 76.7%), employed (n=23, 76.7%), and used compostable tobacco products (n=24, 80.0%). Over one third (n=12, 40.0%) used tobacco products at home, and a similar portion smoked with either friends (n=15, 30.0%) or family members (n=1, 3.3%). Nearly two thirds (n=19, 63.3%) of tobacco users were exposed to second-hand smoke. Over two thirds (n=21, 70.0%), while mental health accounted for 13.3% of tobacco users. Nearly half of tobacco users had a previous quit attempt, with the majority (n=11, 79.0%) attempting to quit using cold turkey methods. All tobacco users (n=30, 100.0%) who attended the clinic were asked and advised to quit tobacco products by healthcare professionals. The majority were ready to quit (n=24, 80.0%) and a similar portion attempted to quit.</p><p>Activating tobacco cessation services at their best practice can increase uptake of cessation services, increase readiness to quit, and subsequently increase quit attempts. More research is required to examine the impact of implementing tobacco cessation at its best practice in increasing quit rates.</p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>WHO. Core questionnaire of the reporting instrument of WHO FCTC. 2020. Available: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">Oman_2020_WHOFCTCreport.pdf</inter-ref> [Accessed March 25, 2025].</p></li><li><p>Salma, A-K, Paul K. &lsquo;Building on Success in Tobacco Control: A Roadmap Towards Tobacco-Free Oman (Perspective Review). <I>J Public Health Intern</I> 2023;6(4):1&ndash;17. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.14302/issn.2641-4538.jphi-23-4635</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>WHO<I>. Guidelines for implementation of article 14</I> (no date) <I>Who.int</I>. 2013. Available: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://fctc.who.int/publications/m/item/guidelines-for-implementation-of-article-14</inter-ref> [Accessed March 25, 2025].</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al-Kalbani, S. R., Al-Lawati, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.207</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.207</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[207 The impact of establishing a comprehensive stop smoking service at a primary healthcare setting in the quit attempts: a quality improvement project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A156</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A156</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A156-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[208 Improving medicines use and safety for older people living in UK care homes]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A156-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Older people living in care homes (long-term care facilities) have multiple health conditions and as a result are prescribed several medicines. While medicines can be beneficial, taking multiple medicines (polypharmacy) can have negative outcomes such as adverse drug reactions and hospitalisation. Reducing problematic polypharmacy has the potential to reduce adverse events and improve quality of life. In the UK, structured medication reviews (SMRs) are conducted to comprehensively evaluate a patient&rsquo;s medicines and care home residents are high priority. However, there is limited research on the best approach to conducting SMRs, including communication when medicines are stopped for care home residents. We previously co-designed patient-centred resources with stakeholders to support older people living at home to help prepare them for SMRs. These resources have been widely implemented in UK primary care. This project aimed to adapt the resources for older people living in care homes.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This research was underpinned by the ADAPT principles for modifying interventions to new contexts (Moore et al, 2021) and the experience-based co-design (EBCD) approach to intervention development (Bowen et al, 2013; Tsianakas et al, 2021). The first stage of data collection comprised &lsquo;think aloud&rsquo; interviews with different stakeholder groups. During interviews, the original intervention materials were shown to care home residents, their relatives, care home staff and primary healthcare professionals, and their thoughts towards the fit of the materials in the care home context were explored. Data were analysed using the person-based approach to intervention development (Yardley et al, 2015). Following interviews, four co-design workshops were conducted with a mixture of care home residents&rsquo; relatives, care home staff and primary healthcare professionals. During the workshops, ideas generated from the interviews were discussed alongside potential implementation challenges for care homes. Following each workshop, adaptations were made to the intervention materials for discussion at subsequent workshops. Finally, intervention materials were shared with residents during individual consultations and final adaptations made.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Twenty &lsquo;think aloud&rsquo; interviews were conducted with 4 residents, 4 residents&rsquo; relatives, 5 care home staff and 7 healthcare professionals (HCP). Across the four workshops, 19 participants took part (7 HCPs, 3 care home staff and 9 relatives). Four residents participated in individual consultations. Stakeholders discussed the benefits of the provision of a written record which can coordinate input from residents, relatives and care home staff which can be used to guide the SMR discussion. The importance of explaining the SMR process carefully and considerately to families and care staff was perceived as crucial by participants alongside emphasising the potential benefits of reducing medications for residents and avoiding the use of jargon. Staff training to develop familiarity with the adapted documents and an understanding of the benefits of deprescribing are likely to make implementation easier and more sustainable.</p></sec><sec><st>Five resources were produced</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>An easy-read SMR invite letter for residents explaining the process and its purpose with space to make written notes in preparation for the SMR.</p></li><li><p>A relative SMR invite letter explaining the process and purpose of the review alongside suggestions for how they might contribute to the review.</p></li><li><p>An easy-read &lsquo;Safely Stopping Medicines&rsquo; document to inform residents about medication to be stopped following a SMR. The document includes the rationale for stopping a medicine and advice on what side effects to look out for which may be associated with medication changes.</p></li><li><p>A &lsquo;Safely Stopping Medicines&rsquo; document for care home staff and relatives which explains which medicine(s) have been stopped and why. It also includes advice on identifying side effects which are potentially associated with medication changes.</p></li><li><p>A care home staff education poster, to familiarise staff with the purpose of SMRs and their role in SMRs.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The previously developed SMR materials required significant adaptation to the care home context. The adapted materials aim to improve the quality and safety of SMRs by taking a resident-centred approach and involving all stakeholders. </p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Halligan, D., Shamsan, H., Butt, N., Breen, L., Alldred, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.208</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.208</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[208 Improving medicines use and safety for older people living in UK care homes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A156</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A157</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A157-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[209 Improving quality of imaging requests and reports in a primary care setting]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A157-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>We recognise that the quality of primary care imaging requests and reports can be variable, and a discussion amongst clinicians highlighted room for improvement. We therefore conducted a primary care quality improvement project in a rural practice in the United Kingdom. The practice has a list size of 16,500 patients across two sites, with a team of General Practitioners and ancillary clinical staff.</p><p>The project was discussed with the clinical team to assess feasibility and usefulness. There was consensus that this would be an effective quality improvement activity.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We devised a checklist of 5 criteria to look at the standard of imaging requests and reports. These were based on the Royal College of Radiologists Standards for Interpretation and Reporting of Imaging Investigations.<sup>1</sup> We analysed randomly selected imaging requests and reports following a checklist: 1. Clinical question in the request 2. Clinical question answered by report 3. Differential diagnosis in report 4. Advice about management in report 5. Action taken on management advice.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Initial analysis indicated a clinical question was included in 52% of requests, and clinical question answered 98% of the time. A differential diagnosis was given in the report 95% of the time, and action recommended in 20%. Recommendations were acted on by the clinicians in 95% of cases.</p><p>These findings were discussed at a clinical meeting, and examples of good practice were considered. Feedback and suggestions for improvement were invited. There was consensus to improve the quality of imaging requests. Following this, findings and points for improvement were circulated to the whole practice team. Specific areas highlighted for improvement were including a clinical question in the request and ensuring that 100% of reports were acted upon.</p><p>Three weeks after the initial data collection, we analysed another random selection of 47 requests and reports using the same criteria. A clinical question was included in requests 68% of the time after intervention, compared to 52% previously. Recommendations were acted on 95% of the time at baseline and 100% thereafter. There was little change in clinical question answered (98% vs 87%), differential diagnosis given (95% and 89%), or action recommended by the report (20% vs 21%).</p></sec><sec><st>Limitations</st><p>A limitation of the project was that we had little input from the radiology department, and we were not able to involve patients or carers. </p><p>How were patients involved</p><p>Patients were not involved in this project, though going forward we feel this would be useful.</p><p>What this study adds</p><p>A simple intervention using clinician education and involvement can improve the quality of imaging requests. This has implications for improving patient care, as better quality requests are likely to result in more useful reporting.<sup>2</sup>  </p><p>No conflicts of interest to declare.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>The Royal College of Radiologists. Standards for Interpretation and Reporting of Imaging Investigations 2nd edition London: The Royal College of Radiologists; 2018 [Available from: https://www.rcr.ac.uk/media/yiglbn35/rcr-publications_standards-for-interpretation-and-reporting-of-imaging-investigations-second-edition_march-2018.pdf.</p></li><li><p>Castillo C, Steffens T, Sim L, Caffery L. The effect of clinical information on radiology reporting: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 2021;68(1):60&ndash;74.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sinha, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.209</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.209</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[209 Improving quality of imaging requests and reports in a primary care setting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A157</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A157</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A157-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[210 Residential radon exposure and lung cancer - a feasibility study in the interior health authority Region of British Columbia, Canada]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A157-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Lung cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in Canada and is the leading cause of death in both men and women. The most common causative agent is cigarette smoke.<sup>1</sup> However, a less publicly recognized cause is radon exposure.<sup>2</sup> Geologic surveys of the Interior Health region of British Columbia (BC) have shown elevated levels of uranium and, consequently, elevated radon levels in the soil within this area.<sup>3</sup> To date, there have been no published case-control studies, especially examining the feasibility of measuring residential radon levels in patients diagnosed with lung cancer within this region. This study aims to enroll cancer patients seen at BC Cancer in the city of Kelowna and prospectively measure the radon levels in their homes using alpha-track detectors. The primary objective is to identify the feasibility of a larger-scale study by determining the recruitment and retention rates while highlighting the successes and challenges faced while conducting the study on a smaller sample size.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p> Single-centered prospective case-control study based in BC Cancer Kelowna. Patients with lung cancer and their close acquaintances without lung cancer were respectively categorized into case and control groups. All participants were above the age of 50 and resided within the Interior Health Authority for at least 5 years. Subjective lifestyle information and histological diagnosis were collected. Alpha-track radon detectors were provided, and participants were instructed to keep them in place for 100 days during the late fall and winter seasons. Upon completion, the participants were informed of their radon level and whether it was within Canadian guidelines.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p> Over 316 individuals were approached, and 99 of these individuals enrolled and consented to the study (63 case and 36 control). The recruitment rate was 19.9%, and the retention rate was 80.9% for case participants, while the recruitment rate was 78.3% and the retention rate was 86.1% for control participants. The mean radon level in case participants was 171 Bq/m<sup>3</sup>(18&ndash;860 Bq/m<sup>3)</sup>compared to 160 Bq/m<sup>3</sup>(12&ndash;535 Bq/m<sup>3</sup>) in control participants (p = 0.029). The most prevalent histological lung cancer subtype found in case participants with elevated radon levels was squamous cell carcinoma (p = 0.019). This feasibility study provided valuable insight into healthcare quality and safety by observing the appropriateness of radon testing during cancer diagnosis. Furthermore, it identified crucial challenges faced along the way, such as laboratory delays, seasonality of testing, participant compliance, and carrier mail, which should all be addressed before future study upscaling.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Cancer CCS/S canadienne du. Canadian Cancer Society. [cited 2025 Mar 18]. Cancer statistics at a glance. Available from: https://cancer.ca/en/research/cancer-statistics/cancer-statistics-at-a-glance</p></li><li><p>Cancer CCS/S canadienne du. Canadian Cancer Society. 2024 [cited 2025 Mar 18]. Risks for lung cancer. Available from: https://cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-types/lung/risks</p></li><li><p>Malinovsky G, Yarmoshenko I, Vasilyev A. Meta-analysis of case-control studies on the relationship between lung cancer and indoor radon exposure. <I>Radiat Environ Biophys.</I> 2019 Mar;58(1):39&ndash;47.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Witham, K., Huang, C., Lo, J., Solano, O., Withers, C., Nichol, A.-M., Forsman-Philips, L., Atrchian, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.210</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.210</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[210 Residential radon exposure and lung cancer - a feasibility study in the interior health authority Region of British Columbia, Canada]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A157</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A158</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A159-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[212 The exposome of major depressive disorder: insights from an Egyptian sample for the advancement of precision practices in mental healthcare]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A159-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Major depressive disorder (MDD) has been recognized as a global public health concern affect-ing the lives of 264 million people with increasing prevalence worldwide. Inspired by the exposomic research, this study aims to investigate the dynamic and complex interplay between different demographic, lifestyle, environmental factors and bimolecular factors that are potentially involved in the pathology of MDD in a sample of Egyptian adults living in Cairo. This is in an attempt to acknowledge the biological underpinnings of MDD without underestimating the role of environmental influences. The context of Egypt provides richness to the current study given the national transition from an agricultural society, to a more industrialized one.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The sample included 107 adults from both genders between the ages of 18 and 50. Convenience sampling was used to recruit participants from different social and community platforms. Participants were excluded on the basis of having comorbid psychotic or neurodegenerative disorders, terminal conditions and cognitive disabilities that might interfere with their clinical presentation. A comprehensive questionnaire was developed and then refined to collect demographic, psychosocial, lifestyle and environmental data in addition to a mini mental state examination (MMSE). Additionally, the Arabic version of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) was used to assess the severity of depressive symptoms and to generate a symptoms profile. The translated Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI 7.0.2) was used to diagnostically differentiate between participants with MDD and healthy controls in addition to identifying cases of past episodes and recurrent episodes of MDD. Participants were also required to give blood samples for the examination of a wide range of biomarkers that are theoretically expected to be linked with MDD. These included EGF, FGF-2, FGF-9, FGF-21, FGF-22, IFN-, IGF-1, IL-1&beta;, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, TNF-&alpha; , VEGFC, and VEGFD in addition to complete blood parameters. Statistical analysis were conducted including basic descriptive testing, correlational testing and mediation analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Results show several significant correlations between different inflammatory and neurotrophic biomarkers. Significant correlations were also established between different lifestyle factors and MDD outcomes and different biomarkers and MDD outcomes. Some bio-markers (namely, EGF, FGF-2, FGF-21, FGF-9, IGF-1, IL-1&beta;, IL-17, IL-6, TNF-&alpha; , VEGFD, WBC, MCH and RBC) showed symptom-specific correlations. More in-depth analysis revealed the mediational effect of a few biomarkers between some risk factors and MDD outcomes. However, some challenges limit the generalizability of the findings including the sample size, the cross-sectional study design and the use of peripheral rather than central biomarkers. In conclusion and despite its limitations, this study offers valuable insights about the complexity of MDD in an Egyptian sample combining psychosocial, environmental and biomolecular data. Such findings highlight the pressing need for a more personalized approach in the study of MDD and other psychiatric disorders. It shows real potential of investing in precision mental health re-search for the development and enhancement of personalized intervention and prevention strategies.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deif, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.212</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.212</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[212 The exposome of major depressive disorder: insights from an Egyptian sample for the advancement of precision practices in mental healthcare]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A159</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A159</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A159-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[213 Patient-reported outcomes collection goes digital in Austria: early insights of unlocking inflammatory bowel disease patient insights via app]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A159-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are crucial in disease management and should be an integral part of clinical practice. The Health Outcomes Observatory (H2O) project provides digital tools for patients to measure their outcomes whilst implementing a governance system that gives patients autonomy to control their data flows and allows for ethical data sharing.<sup>1</sup> To ensure high-quality data collection, H2O has selected core outcome sets for diabetes mellitus, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and oncology. By collecting the core outcomes sets in multiple European countries (Austria, Germany, Spain, and the Netherlands), H2O builds a real-world evidence library available for research and decision-making purposes <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 213 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Health Outcomes Observatory, an International consortium of public and private parties</p></caption><link locator="213_F1"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>An existing digital IBD tool was identified as a qualified candidate for collecting PROs in Austria and adapted with substantial input from patients and healthcare professionals to align with the H2O IBD core outcome set.<sup>2,3,4</sup> The H2O patient agreement was included in the app to ensure patient consent was properly documented.<sup>5</sup> The adapted app was launched in selected hospitals participating in the H2O network, aiming at serving as a communication platform between patients and healthcare professionals to enhance patient care. The health data captured through the app are aggregated in the H2O backend provider Gesundheit O&#x0308;sterreich GmbH GO&#x0308;G. Feedback about the app&rsquo;s usage will be gathered through a feasibility study and user interviews.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p> Five-hundred thirty-two recruited IBD patients who started to collect PRO data using the internal ePRO system of the Medical University of Vienna are asked for feedback about the acceptance to digitally captured PROs.</p><p>Health professionals will report whether the use of the app increases transparency and facilitation of meaningful discussions around PROs between patient and professionals. In clinical practice, these meaningful discussions could contribute to shared decision making between patient and healthcare professional.</p><p>Quantitative data on user friendliness and potential reduction of administrative burden will be collected to test if digital tools can provide a sustainable and user-friendly method for capturing patient outcomes in routine care.<sup>2</sup>  </p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 213 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Screenshots and features of the H2O CED Austria App</p></caption><link locator="213_F2"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p> Digitally collected PROs offer valuable insights into patient health and disease management. Our research shows that leveraging existing technologies, adapted based on feedback of patients and healthcare professionals, can support collection of ePROs. We developed an H2O IBD app in Austria to enhance communication and transparency between patients and healthcare professionals. The H2O governance structure offers technology companies and app providers an opportunity to leverage their digital tools in clinical practice. Qualitative and quantitative results from a feasibility study as well as implementation across additional hospitals is expected to further improve care for IBD patients.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Stamm T, Bott N, Thwaites R, <I>et al</I>. Building a value-based care infrastructure in Europe: the health outcomes observatory. <I>NEJM Catalyst</I> June 9, 2021. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.1056/CAT.21.0146</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p><inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.takeda.foryouwithyou.se&amp;hl=de&amp;gl=US</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Ghosh S, Louis E, Beaugerie L, <I>et al</I>. Development of the IBD Disk: a visual self-administered tool for assessing disability in inflammatory bowel diseases. <I>Inflamm Bowel Dis.</I> 2017 Mar;<b>23</b>(3):333&ndash;340. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000001033. PMID: 28146002; PMCID: PMC5319390.</p></li><li><p>Fierens L, Carney N, Novacek G, <I>et al</I>. Health outcomes observatory H2O patient advisory board for inflammatory bowel diseases, health outcomes observatory H2O steering committee, Charlafti I, Ferrante M. A Core Outcome Set for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Development and Recommendations for Implementation in Clinical Practice Through an International Multi-stakeholder Consensus Process. <I>J Crohns Colitis.</I> 2024 Oct 15;<b>18</b>(10):1583&ndash;1595. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad195. PMID: 38019894.</p></li><li><p><inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://health-outcomes-observatory.eu/h2o-patient-agreement</inter-ref>.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stamm, T., Novacek, G., Koenders, J., Duftschmid, G., Rischl, V., Mosor, E., Gross, E., Styliadou, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.213</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.213</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[213 Patient-reported outcomes collection goes digital in Austria: early insights of unlocking inflammatory bowel disease patient insights via app]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A159</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A160</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A164-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[218 Optimizing pediatric ED discharge prescriptions: an informatics, multidisciplinary, and ergonomic approach]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A164-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Pediatric medication prescribing in the emergency department (ED) is complex due to age- and weight-based dosing, formulation considerations, and usability challenges within electronic health records (EHR). At a central Massachusetts hospital system&mdash;including academic, community, and rural EDs with a total yearly (2024) volume of 280,000 patients (49,000 pediatric)&mdash;84% of pediatric patients are discharged. However, the existing Epic discharge prescription workflow was inefficient, leading to redundant clicks, unclear medication guidance, and potential medication errors. This project aimed to optimize pediatric discharge order sets using human factors engineering (HFE) techniques to enhance workflow efficiency and patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A multidisciplinary team&mdash;including pharmacy, pediatric and general emergency medicine providers, and clinical informatics&mdash;collaborated to redesign the EHR discharge workflow. National guidelines informed the curation of high-quality medication recommendations. HFE principles were applied, incorporating standardized formatting, color-coded guidance, and automation of dosing and duration for antibiotics. EHR rules were implemented to display only age- and weight-appropriate medications, eliminating irrelevant options. A total of 19 discharge order sets were optimized, with 6 newly created. Click reduction was analyzed as a measure of improved workflow efficiency.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Workflow optimization significantly reduced provider clicks required for discharge prescriptions. A small segment analysis demonstrated:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>  <b>Urinary Tract Infections (UTI):</b> 71% reduction (21 clicks to 6)</p></li><li><p>  <b>Upper Respiratory Infections (URI/Cold):</b> 62% reduction (21 clicks to 8)</p></li><li><p>  <b>Fever:</b> 62% reduction (13 clicks to 5)</p></li></l></p><p>This analysis serves as an example of efficiency gains across multiple discharge conditions. The implementation of HFE-driven improvements enhanced EHR usability, streamlined provider workflow, and reduced the risk of medication errors. Future steps include monitoring provider adoption and feedback to further refine and sustain these enhancements.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edwards, J., Sanseverino, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.218</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.218</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[218 Optimizing pediatric ED discharge prescriptions: an informatics, multidisciplinary, and ergonomic approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A164</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A164</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A164-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[219 Co-designing emergency departments to improve care for people with mental illness]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A164-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Increasing demand for emergency care in Australia has resulted in overcrowded Emergency Departments (EDs).<sup>1</sup> In 2022&ndash;23, the median length of stay for all mental health-related presentations was 4 h:55 m and 10% of presentations had a length of stay exceeding 18 hours.<sup>2</sup> Poor outcomes and experiences are reported by people seeking mental health care at EDs. Similarly, staff who work in EDs experience stress and dissatisfaction.<sup>1</sup>  </p><p>The MyED research project is using an Experience-based codesign (EBCD) approach to co-develop and implement new or adapted models of care to strengthen patient experience, patient outcomes, staff experience and system performance in EDs.<sup>3</sup> Traditionally, filmed participant interviews have been used in EBCD to establish empathy in co-design sessions, but given ethical and moral implications, we determined to develop persona dyads (patient/provider) as an alternative co-design tool.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>To understand the experience of ED care for people presenting to an ED with mental illness, we:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Completed ethnographic observations of the three participating EDs to understand the patient-provider interface</p></li><li><p>Interviewed people who have presented to an ED with mental illness</p></li><li><p>Interviewed staff working in EDs</p></li><li><p>Interviewed mental health epistemic experts</p></li><li><p>Analysed the evocative moments, &lsquo;touchpoints&rsquo;, prioritised for co-design</p></li><li><p>Developed persona dyads to represent patients and providers relevant to the touchpoints.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Analysis of project data collected identified two areas of need: earlier clinical review and in-house process improvements to support patients with mental illness presenting to ED; and integrated models of care, treatment and support for high acuity patients. With the areas of need established, we designed two persona dyads (patient/provider) for use in the workshops as a novel co-design tool.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Payne K, Risi D, O&rsquo;Hare A, Binks S, Curtis K. Factors that contribute to patient length of stay in the emergency department: A time in motion observational study. <I>Australas Emerg Care</I> 2023;Dec;<b>26</b>(4):321&ndash;325.</p></li><li><p>Australian Institute of Health and Welfare [Internet]. Presentations to emergency departments. Canberra (ACT): Australian Government; 2024 [cited 16 March 2025]. Available from: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.aihw.gov.au/mental-health/topic-areas/emergency-departments</inter-ref>.</p></li><li><p>Cheek C, Hayba N, Richardson L, Austin EE, Francis Auton E, Safi M, <I>et al</I>. Experience-based codesign approach to improve care in Australian emergency departments for complex consumer cohorts: the MyED project protocol, Stages 1.1&ndash;1.3. <I>BMJ Open</I> 2023;<b>13</b>:e072908.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dominello, A., Cheek, C., Clay-Williams, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.219</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.219</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[219 Co-designing emergency departments to improve care for people with mental illness]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A164</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A164</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A165-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[220 High fidelity simulation learning for health care professionals: an in-situ simulation training]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A165-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>To enhance patient safety, simulation-based learning has been utilized as an indispensable element in the training among health care professionals. Different procedure skills, medical situation, communication, team building, and leadership can be learnt through a designed scenario and advanced simulation tools. To acquire an effective clinical learning experience through simulation, fidelity is one of the essential tenets to provide the exactness of degree to recreate an actual medical situation. Hence, the environmental component of fidelity is crucial to enhance simulation&rsquo;s realism level. Simulation-based learning is usually carried out in simulation labs in the present curriculum of health care professionals&rsquo; training. However, an in-situ simulation carried out in the actual work environment with the usage of the equipment and tools is not common.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To minimize the theory-practice gap of Junior nursing staffs.</p><p>To improve health care professionals&rsquo; competence, team cooperation and leadership.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>In-situ ward-based simulations with neurosurgical-specific scenarios have been organized by nurses. ADDIE model was utilized to guide the development process of training, which consists of five phases, namely analyze, design, develop, implement and evaluate. For evaluation the outcomes of in-situ simulation, Pre-/Post-test were arranged before and after the simulation training. Besides, an evaluation survey with open-ended questions was allocated at the end.</p></sec><sec><st>Result</st><p>The in-situ simulation provided a high-fidelity training towards healthcare professionals to familiarize and practice different medical situations or procedures. Hence, the learning objectives of all simulations were well achieved. All participants and observers were satisfied to the simulation training, and they would like to recommend this training to other colleagues. &lsquo;Simulation in an actual ward setting can provide a higher confidence in work&rsquo; from the comments of participants were received.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>In-situ simulation can provide a high-fidelity training to enhance patient&rsquo; safety and reduce the theory-practice gap of health professionals. This training method supports ongoing education for healthcare professionals by providing opportunities for continuous learning in a familiar context. It allows staff to refine their skills regularly without the need for separate training sessions away from their primary responsibilities Moreover, simulation organized by department not only can provide more simulation training opportunities to front-line colleagues, but can ease the workload of the simulation center.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hang, F. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.220</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.220</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[220 High fidelity simulation learning for health care professionals: an in-situ simulation training]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A165</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A165</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A165-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[221 Enhancing awareness of safe medication prescription to improve patient care in SGH ward 64 A/C]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A165-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Medication errors refer to any mistakes occurring during medication use process such as prescription, transcription, dispensing, administration or monitoring regardless of whether an injury occurred or whether the potential for injury was present. Medication errors may lead to adverse drug events which endangers patient safety and increases healthcare-related costs. Literature review showed adverse drug events contributed to longer stays of 4.6 days and increase cost. According to the Good Catch report in Ward 64 A/C, a total of 26 cases was related to prescription, which accounted for 81.3% out of 32 cases from July to December 2022. Medication errors may lead to adverse drug events which endangers patient safety. Patient Safety is of TOP priority, which is aligned with the organization&rsquo;s strategic map and safety framework to Target Zero Harm.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>QI team go through the steps of ordering medications to all junior doctors (House offices/Medical Officers) on their first day attach to Ward 64A/C. Emphasized to them how to double check the orders in WLM. Shared most recent medication error occur in the hospital due to ordering error with them to create awareness. Share step by step guide ordering video with them, total 3 videos filmed. Put up reminder slogan. poster in ward 64 MO office to remind Hos/Mos to check orders in WLM after ordering. Involved Speech therapist to assess patient&rsquo;s swallowing abilities and give recommendation on correct formular of medication that should be ordered for patient. Hos/Mos are required to acknowledge the recommendation and initiate the correct prescription.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The project had achieved its goal of zero medication ordering error from January 2023 to September 2023 in Ward 64 A/C. Project showcase in DIM monthly meeting in August 2023, In Sept 2023, project rolled out to ward 46 and ward 46 also able to achieved the median from 3 to 0. In December 2023, our intervention rolled out to all DIM wards in SGH via induction programme; Lastly, it rolled out to all newly graduated doctors through induction programme.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhen, Y. L., Sin, C. H., Yi, C. Z., Yang, H. J., Michelle, L. H., Galang, L. D., Chen, H. Y., Goh, A., Yihua, T., Shi Yun, S. L., Ng, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.221</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.221</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[221 Enhancing awareness of safe medication prescription to improve patient care in SGH ward 64 A/C]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A165</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A165</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A165-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[222 To streamline programme for newly joined nurses in orthopaedic wards]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A165-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Since 1998, the Orthopaedic Induction Programme was first introduced as a 40-hour training programme for new nurses joining an orthopaedic ward. It aims to provide a niche training that is required for the care of patient with orthopaedic issues to ensure that new nurses can practice safely and competently. The trainers are orthopaedic speciality nurses and allied health professionals. Convectional learning approach was used such as face-to-face lectures, group discussions and practical assessment. In recent years, due to exigencies of duties and labour shortages, there were constraints to conduct the induction programme face-to-face. Online e-learning was thus adopted to replace some of the training however more is still needed to reduce the training hours and ensure more participation by new nurses within three months.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>The objective is to streamline the induction programme by reducing the training hours and ensuring newly joined nurses are inducted within three months.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>A workgroup was formed by orthopaedic speciality nurses. Discussions were carried out using the cause-and-effect diagram (<I><cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref></I>) to identify the root cause problems. Multi-voting was used to finalise root cause problems using Pareto chart (<I><cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref></I>), followed by brainstorming practical solutions by using Driver&rsquo;s Diagram (<I><cross-ref type="fig" refid="F3">figure 3</cross-ref></I>). Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) (<I><cross-ref type="fig" refid="F4">figure 4</cross-ref></I>) cycle, a series of interventions were initiated to revamp and improve the workflow to register the newly joined nurses for the orthopaedic induction programme. Workgroup members attended Instructor Training course for e-Learning. Simulated lessons were incorporated into the orthopaedic induction programme using the e-learning portal via Wizlearn.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>With the implementation of e-Learning, the duration of orthopaedic induction programme is reduced from 40 hours to 13 hours. Time saved per staff is 27 hours.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Transition into professional practice is usually complex and multifaceted. Newly joined nurses frequently struggle to complete the transition into professional practice smoothly. The use of e-learning has been a success by providing systematic sharing of knowledge. Overall, resources were optimized and less costly. New nurses were able to progress at their own self-paced learning and have access to reading materials easily.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 222 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Cause and effect diagram</p></caption><link locator="222_F1"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 222 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Pareto chart</p></caption><link locator="222_F2"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F3"><no>Abstract 222 Figure 3</no><caption><p>Driver&rsquo;s diagram</p></caption><link locator="222_F3"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F4"><no>Abstract 222 Figure 4</no><caption><p>PDSA cycle</p></caption><link locator="222_F4"></fig></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ishak, N. M., Hassan, N., Samsi, N., Lilin, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.222</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.222</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[222 To streamline programme for newly joined nurses in orthopaedic wards]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A165</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A167</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A168-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[224 Hyponatremia: an audit to assess our hospitals compliance to hyponatremia assessment]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A168-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Hyponatremia is an abnormal decrease in the sodium levels in the blood. It is a common complication of various conditions, such as liver failure, heart failure, renal failure and pneumonia. Symptoms can range from mild, such as tremors, to life-threatening, like coma. Hence, effective assessment and management guidelines are critical for inpatient care. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has formulated guidelines for evaluating and managing hyponatremia; however, our hospital lacked up-to-date protocols before this audit. This audit aimed to assess our current management practices against NICE guidelines and, in turn, update our hospital guidelines.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A retrospective review of laboratory data was conducted for patients admitted to the acute medical unit between February and June 2023 (first audit cycle) and May and June 2024 (second cycle). Sixty-one cases were reviewed in the first cycle, with 58 meeting inclusion criteria (sodium &lt;127 meq/l). In the second cycle, 30 cases were assessed. Each case was evaluated against NICE guidelines, focusing on diagnostic workup and key management parameters.</p></sec><sec><st>Parameters assessed included</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Sodium levels &lt;127 meq/l</p></li><li><p>Assessment of the patient&lsquo;s Volume status</p></li><li><p>Medication review during admission</p></li><li><p>Were the lab tests requested (serum osmolality, urine osmolality, urinary sodium, 9 AM cortisol, Thyroid function test)?</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Compared to the first audit cycle, the second cycle showed several improvements. 100% of patients met the audit standards, up from 95% in the first cycle. In the second cycle, 80% of patients had their volume status assessed during clinical examination, an increase from 69% in the first cycle. Medication reviews during admission were conducted for 77% of patients, compared to 66% in the first cycle.</p><p>Laboratory test assessments also improved: serum osmolality increased from 36% to 47%, urine osmolality from 33% to 47%, and urine sodium from 33% to 47%. Additionally, 9 AM cortisol testing compliance increased by 6%.</p><p>Overall, while significant improvements were observed in several audit parameters, the request for thyroid function tests declined from 63% in the first cycle to 53%. Notably, unlike several occurrences during the first cycle, no lab tests ordered in the second cycle were left unperformed.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The audit revealed that hyponatremia management in the acute setting was often incomplete, potentially leading to more extended hospital stays and higher readmission rates. The improvements observed in the second audit cycle demonstrate progress in adhering to NICE guidelines. However, the decline in thyroid function test requests suggests an area for further attention. Enhanced diagnostic clarity and guideline adherence could improve patient outcomes, experience, and cost-effectiveness.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katyal, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.224</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.224</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[224 Hyponatremia: an audit to assess our hospitals compliance to hyponatremia assessment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A168</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A168</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A168-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[225 Improving the timeliness of discharge summaries in the acute admissions unit]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A168-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Delays in discharge summaries are a widespread challenge within the NHS, highlighting the critical need for timely communication to ensure effective follow-up care and patient safety. This quality improvement project aimed to address delays in discharge summaries at Sheffield Children&rsquo;s NHS Foundation Trust&rsquo;s Acute Admissions Unit. A survey conducted within the Acute Admissions Unit revealed that high patient volumes and staffing constraints were the primary causes of delayed discharge summaries. Technical issues, including slow computer systems, also contributed to delays. Interventions were implemented to find a solution that would reduce delays in discharge summary completion.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim</st><p>The project aimed to ensure that 90% of discharge summaries are delivered to GPs within 48 hours, with delays beyond 48 hours limited to exceptional cases.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>The Model for Improvement framework was used to structure the project, focusing on clear aims, measurable outcomes, and iterative testing using PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) cycles. Key interventions included daily WhatsApp reminders sent to doctors, weekly huddles to review progress, and an orientation program for new doctors to ensure they understood the importance of timely discharge summaries. Verbal encouragement and feedback were provided to the team, updating them on improvements. Five PDSA cycles were completed over 8 weeks, with improvements seen in doctor engagement and timely completion of discharge summaries.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The initial observation done over a 20-day period showed significant delays and fluctuations in the completion of discharge summaries. Post-intervention data demonstrated a consistent reduction in delays, with no delays observed after the fifth week. The project successfully achieved its goal of delivering over 90% of discharge summaries to GPs within 48 hours. Although staffing constraints and high patient volumes remained significant challenges, the project demonstrated the effectiveness of daily reminders, progress updates, and improved doctor orientation in reducing delays <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 225 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Delayed discharge summaries on the Acute Admissions Unit</p></caption><link locator="225_F1"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>This project successfully improved the timeliness of discharge summaries in the Acute Admissions Unit. While addressing patient load and staffing constraints was not feasible, the change in behaviour had a significant impact. Doctors responded well to reminders, effectively managing backlogs and ensuring timely discharges. To sustain these improvements, it is recommended to implement automation within the electronic health record system, which would prevent patients from being removed from the ward list until their discharge summaries are completed. This would reduce the need for manual oversight and help ensure timely completion.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lawson, R. O., Matthew, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.225</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.225</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[225 Improving the timeliness of discharge summaries in the acute admissions unit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A168</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A169</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A170-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[227 Assessing healthcare staff awareness of NRFit&trade; connector design features: a survey on improving patient safety in neuraxial applications]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A170-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) developed the ISO 80369 engineering standards to regulate the design of small-bore connectors for clinical applications, preventing tubing misconnections and wrong-route errors. Among these standards, ISO 80369-6, or NRFit&trade;, specifically addresses neuraxial and major regional anaesthesia applications. The traditional Luer connector, widely used across medical fields, poses a significant risk due to its compatibility across multiple applications, leading to potential administration errors. The transition to NRFit&trade; aims to enhance patient safety by eliminating the possibility of misconnections.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A survey was conducted to assess the awareness of healthcare staff regarding the key design differences between NRFit&trade; and Luer lock syringes/connectors. The survey focused on three main features: the NRFit&trade; connector&rsquo;s yellow colour coding, its 20% smaller diameter compared to Luer connectors, and its flush tip design (unlike the Luer tip, which extends beyond the collar). A total of 30 respondents participated in the survey.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The survey revealed limited awareness among staff regarding the unique features of NRFit&trade; connectors. None of the respondents correctly identified all three key differences. Only 3% of participants correctly identified two features (colour coding and smaller diameter), while 23% identified one feature (colour coding). A significant majority (73%) failed to identify any of the key differences, and 50% provided non-related answers. Common responses included mentions of colour coding, diameter differences, and ease of use, but many answers were inaccurate or unrelated to the specific design features of NRFit&trade;.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>NRFit&trade; specialized small-bore connector design represents a critical improvement in medical practice, significantly enhancing patient safety by preventing wrong-route medication administration. Successful implementation of NRFit&trade; within healthcare settings requires careful planning and collaboration with all stakeholders. Training and education initiatives are necessary to improve staff awareness and facilitate the transition from Luer lock systems.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>B. Braun USA. (n.d.). NRFit&trade; Design Information. Retrieved from <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.bbraunusa.com</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>ISMP. (n.d.). NRFit&trade;: A Global Fit for Neuraxial Medication Safety. Retrieved from <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.ismp.org</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>NHS England. (2017). Resources to Support Safe Transition to NRFit&trade;. Retrieved from <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.england.nhs.uk</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>British Journal of Nursing. (n.d.). Changing Practice for Neuraxial Applications Using NRFit&trade;.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ibadin, M. O., Kale, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.227</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.227</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[227 Assessing healthcare staff awareness of NRFit&trade; connector design features: a survey on improving patient safety in neuraxial applications]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A170</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A170</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A170-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[228 Involving citizens in nursing assessments: implementing a checklist in Danish healthcare clinics]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A170-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Regardless of the type of healthcare assistance citizens receive, Danish law requires nurses to conduct a nursing assessment covering 12 specific areas when providing care.<sup>1</sup> However, in some municipal healthcare clinics, these assessments were not carried out as systematically as intended. Some clinics did not initiate the nursing assessment at all, while others attempted to do so but lacked the consistency to implement it effectively. Nurses themselves identified this as a challenge in their daily practice. Additionally, citizens were often unaware in advance that a nursing assessment was required, leaving them unprepared both mentally and timewise. The aim of this quality improvement (QI) project is to ensure that whenever a new citizen begins receiving assistance from a clinic, the nurse systematically conducts a nursing assessment with active involvement from the citizen.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This presentation focuses on implementing an &lsquo;appointment checklist&rsquo; to enhance the assessment process. The checklist aims to encourage citizens to reflect on their healthcare concerns and provide basic information before their follow-up with the nurse. The assessment is then conducted based on the checklist responses. This approach ensures that citizens have time to consider their answers while also enabling nurses to focus on key issues and guide citizens to find help elsewhere than the clinic if needed. The project also emphasizes how to structure and integrate the checklist into clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The presentation will outline preliminary results and the next steps in the process&mdash;one of which is improving accessibility for citizens to actively participate in the nursing assessment. Overall, a cultural shift has occurred among nurses regarding the importance, relevance, and practical application of nursing assessments. Notably, nurses have observed that citizens more openly discuss health issues they previously hesitated to mention.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Sygeplejefaglig journalf&oslash;ring (VEJ nr 9473 af 25/06/2024), Indenrigs- og Sundhedsministeriet</p></li><li><p>2.<inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">Vejledning om sygeplejefaglig journalf&oslash;ring (Til personale der varetager sygeplejefaglige opgaver)</inter-ref>  </p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larsen RN, K. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.228</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.228</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[228 Involving citizens in nursing assessments: implementing a checklist in Danish healthcare clinics]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A170</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A170</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A171-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[229 Improving patient safety: a comprehensive initiative at Bundang seoul national university hospital]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A171-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>In 2021, Bundang Seoul National University Hospital (B-SNUH) observed a 41% increase in serious patient safety incidents, classified as Level 3 (requiring extended hospitalization or surgery) and Level 4 (causing fatal harm), compared to the previous year. These incidents not only prolonged hospital stays but also posed critical risks to patient lives. The Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Department launched a comprehensive initiative to reduce these occurrences and improve the overall safety culture.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The project involved a multi-faceted approach. The team analyzed incident data through the internal patient safety reporting system and customer consultations. Interventions included customized patient safety education for all staff levels, the initiation of M&amp;M conferences, a safety awareness survey, and incentive-based promotion of incident reporting. Peer reviews and root cause analyses were expanded, and on-site safety officers were designated. A patient safety risk registry was established, followed by FMEA-based improvements for high-risk issues such as retained foreign objects and intern skill deficits. Continuous collaboration between quality improvement teams and frontline departments was emphasized.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>As a result of these interventions, the number and complexity of Level 3 and 4 incidents declined. Sentinel events and other major harm incidents were reduced, contributing to a safer care environment and reducing the stress and legal burden on staff. Staff engagement in safety practices improved, and the publication of a Patient Safety Casebook facilitated knowledge sharing. Departments recognized the tangible impact of these activities, enhancing sustainability and participation.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.229</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.229</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[229 Improving patient safety: a comprehensive initiative at Bundang seoul national university hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A171</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A171</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A171-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[230 Streamlining lumbar puncture documentation: enhancing accuracy and safety with a simplified proforma]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A171-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>At Worcestershire Royal Hospital, 118 lumbar punctures (LPs) were performed over a 110-day period, but documentation of key procedural information was found to be significantly lacking. The Royal College of Physicians (RCP) outlines a standard operating procedure for LP documentation to promote patient safety and prevent litigation, including clinician information, patient clotting screen, imaging review, consent, aseptic technique, site of LP, and post-procedural safety information. Initial audits showed that documentation was completed in only 16% of cases, revealing a gap in adherence to RCP guidelines.<sup>1 2</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>This quality improvement project (QIP) aimed to enhance the documentation process for lumbar punctures by introducing a structured proforma, ensuring better compliance with RCP guidelines and improving patient safety by reducing the risk of adverse events.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A comprehensive review of patient records and corresponding cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sample lists was conducted to assess documentation quality. The lack of standardized documentation requirements was identified as a key issue. In response, a proforma was developed to clearly outline the essential RCP-required data. A targeted educational session was delivered to clinicians, many of whom were new foundation doctors, to ensure they understood the documentation standards. The proforma was implemented, with continuous feedback and additional resources, such as an equipment list and sample bottle chart, to reduce clinician cognitive load.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Following the introduction of the proforma, documentation compliance improved significantly, with almost 100% adherence to RCP guidelines, specifically within the Ambulatory Emergency Care (AEC) department. All key procedural components were documented accurately, including pre-, initial-, and post-procedure elements. Clinicians reported reduced cognitive load and fewer missed steps or equipment, facilitating safer and more efficient LPs. The proforma also helped ensure that contraindications, such as abnormal clotting or recent anticoagulation, were reviewed before performing an LP.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The implementation of a simple, structured proforma significantly improved documentation quality, aligning practice with RCP standards and enhancing patient safety. The initiative was well-received by clinicians and has since been adopted across the Trust for all diagnostic and therapeutic LPs. This project highlights the importance of clear, simple documentation tools in improving clinical practice and reducing the risk of adverse outcomes and litigation. Future interventions should focus on ongoing education to address clinician turnover and maintain high standards of care.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 230 Figure 1</no><link locator="230_F1"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 230 Figure 2</no><link locator="230_F2"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F3"><no>Abstract 230 Figure 3</no><link locator="230_F3"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F4"><no>Abstract 230 Figure 4</no><link locator="230_F4"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Engelborghs S, Niemantsverdriet E, Struyfs H, Blennow K, Brouns R, Comabella M, Dujmovic I, van der Flier W, Fro&#x0308;lich L, Galimberti D, Gnanapavan S, Hemmer B, Hoff E, Hort J, Iacobaeus E, Ingelsson M, Jan de Jong F, Jonsson M, Khalil M, Jens K, Alberto Lle&oacute; A, de Mendonca A, Molinuevo J, Nagels G, Paquet C, Parnetti L, Roks G, Rosa-Neto P, Scheltens P, Sk&aring;rsgard C, Stomrud E, Tumani H, Visser P, Wallin A, Winblad B, Zetterberg H, Duits FE, Teunissen C. Consensus guidelines for lumbar puncture in patients with neurological diseases. <I>Alzheimer&rsquo;s &amp; Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment &amp; Disease Monitoring</I> 2017;<b>8</b>(1):111&ndash;126. doi:10.1016/j.dadm.2017.04.007</p></li><li><p><inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">CPOC. (2023), National safety standards for invasive procedures 2 (NatSSIPs). <I>Centre for Perioperative Care</I>. Available at: https://cpoc.org.uk/sites/cpoc/files/documents/2023-02/1.%20CPOC_NatSSIPs_FullVersion_2023_0.pdf Accessed 20/04/2025</inter-ref>  </p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Breakspear, J., Forrester, L., Richler-Potts, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.230</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.230</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[230 Streamlining lumbar puncture documentation: enhancing accuracy and safety with a simplified proforma]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A171</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A173</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A173-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[231 Early inflammatory arthritis (EIA) urgent referral pathway: a quality improvement project for effective utilisation of EIA slots in rheumatology clinics]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A173-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>NICE guidance states that patients with EIA must be seen within 3 weeks to enable early diagnosis and treatment. To facilitate this, we have EIA slots in consultant clinics to see patients with Rheumatoid arthritis, Psoriatic arthritis, Ankylosing spondylitis and other inflammatory arthritides. There is an agreed Directory of Service (DOS) between General Practices and our Rheumatology Department that outlines information required in referrals to enable effective triaging.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>We wanted to evaluate slot utilisation of EIA slots by EIA patients and the impact that non-EIA patients had on the EIA wait times.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We collated a list of all patients triaged to EIA slots over a 3-month period (January to March 2024, inclusive). Patients referred through the electronic referral system (ERS) were included. The patient notes and clinic letters were used to determine patient diagnosis after first review. Referral letters from GPs were evaluated to match information provided in the referral against DOS criteria. We then looked at patients triaged to EIA slots with a final diagnosis of EIA, who were seen within 3 weeks, average wait times for these patients and impact of information provided in the referral on wait times.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>111 EIA referrals were received. 96 were accessible on ERS and therefore included in this audit. 6 patients DNA&rsquo;d first appointment. After first review only 22/90 patients (24%) were diagnosed with EIA: RA (n=13), PsA (n=4), AxSPA (n=1), other IA (n=4). 49/90 patients (54%) had a non-EIA diagnosis (OA, fibromyalgia, other MSK issues). 19/90 patients (21%) had watchful waiting/awaiting investigations outcome.</p><p>24% referrals had 3 or more &lsquo;yes&rsquo; criteria as per the DOS and were suitable for EIA slots.</p><p>Of the patients with a final diagnosis of EIA, only 3/22 patients (14%) were seen within 3 weeks; (average wait time to be seen was 113 days). 12/22 (55%) patients had referrals with insufficient information on the GP referral and 10/12 (83%) patients with insufficient referral information were not seen within the 3 weeks target.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>54% of patients seen in EIA slots were diagnosed with a condition not suitable for these slots after first review. 76% of total referrals accepted by triaging clinicians lacked sufficient information for acceptance into EIA slots. Only 14% of patients on the EIA pathway were seen within the 3 weeks target.</p><p>For effective EIA slot utilisation, more stringent criteria for EIA should be devised and set out in the DOS. Education should be provided to the GPs to populate EIA referrals with appropriate and sufficient information. Triaging clinicians should be reminded of the criteria set out in the DOS and should be encouraged to reject referrals with insufficient information</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mills-Baker, F., Connew, A., Wig, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.231</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.231</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[231 Early inflammatory arthritis (EIA) urgent referral pathway: a quality improvement project for effective utilisation of EIA slots in rheumatology clinics]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A173</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A173</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A173-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[232 Creating an improvement movement - a social movement for change]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A173-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Motivating for change and improvement can be challenging in today&rsquo;s complex healthcare context. Feelings of apathy and hopelessness arising from ever-increasing demands and ever-reducing resources can hold us back. At Ashford and St Peter&rsquo;s Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, (ASPH), we wanted to create a sense of solidarity, <I>&lsquo;we&rsquo;re all in this together&rsquo;</I> and a renewed sense of purpose to unite everyone in the common goal of improving experience and outcomes for patients and staff.</p><p>The &lsquo;Improvement Movement&rsquo; is a social movement for change, bringing improvement conversations to every team and generating motivation for action at a local level. It is building on our established &lsquo;Be the Change&rsquo; programme, which enables any member of staff to come forward with a change idea, gain support for this and learn improvement skills.</p></sec><sec><st>Intervention</st><p>The Improvement Movement was launched in Autumn 2024. A communication campaign using clear branding was used to generate interest and energy. A focussed week of Trust-wide visits, communications and activities started the movement and identified teams keen to get involved.</p><p>Improvement Huddles: short, 15 min structured conversations at team level are a key enabler for this work. The ASPH Improvement Partnership team have supported areas to establish their improvement huddle meetings by providing physical boards, training and facilitation.</p></sec><sec><st>Outcome</st><p>Within 3 months, over 20 improvement huddles were established across 3 hospital sites, in clinical and non-clinical areas. Feedback is very positive, managers finding that opening discussions around problems such as staffing and workload have led to some surprising and easy solutions. Raising concerns at a team level is enabling staff to resolve problems that have been weighing them down, without needing to involve senior management.</p><p>ASPH is continuing to grow the Improvement Movement, making use of its collective power to impact significant change within the Trust and across the local healthcare system.</p><p>Contact Information <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">asp-tr.bethechange@nhs.net</inter-ref>  </p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greensmith, S., Holland, C., Jones, G., Nelson, G., Poole, N., Smerdon, T., Watson, S., Yeong, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.232</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.232</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[232 Creating an improvement movement - a social movement for change]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A173</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A174</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A174-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[233 Breaking free - generating motivation and action for improvement - a case study: improving the diabetic foot infection pathway at Ashford and St Peters hospitals NHS foundation trust]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A174-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Diabetes UK predicts that 5.5 million people in the UK will be living with diabetes by 2030<sup>1</sup> and it is likely that &gt;50% will be treated for foot ulcers, each with a 70% chance of major amputation.</p><p>At Ashford and St Peter&rsquo;s Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (ASPH), as in many NHS organisations, the Diabetic Foot Infection (DFI) pathway is complex, crossing professional and organisational boundaries. The team at ASPH were &lsquo;stuck&rsquo; &ndash; paralysed by this big problem. Clinical teams felt overwhelmed by the demands of the service and demoralised by poor patient outcomes and experience, they simply didn&rsquo;t know where to start to make things better.</p><p>Using improvement methodology<sup>2</sup> enabled the team to break down this complex problem into smaller, more manageable components. Forming a strong project team with a clear, shared, objective created motivation for action and the ability to move forward with pathway changes.</p></sec><sec><st>Methodology</st><p>Pathway mapping was used to discover opportunities for improvement, using data and engaging with relevant clinicians at each stage. A clear &lsquo;bottle neck&rsquo; was identified and the team came together to discuss potential solutions.</p><p>The case for change in the pathway was supported by data: an audit of intravenous antibiotic, (IVAbx), use in DFI patients and local patient outcomes taken from the National Diabetes Survey.</p><p>Following the discovery phase, three significant tests of change were undertaken:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Piloting a new DFI clinic run from an existing Infusion Suite location utilising IV nursing expertise alongside diabetes consultant and expert podiatric input</p></li><li><p>Simplification of referral processes, to reduce delays in patients with DFI presenting for care</p></li><li><p>Establish a specialist orthopaedic role to strengthen decision making and interventions available for in-patients</p></li></l></p><p>The long-term aim for the team is to bring all ASPH DFI services together into a one day &lsquo;mega&rsquo; MDT clinic, as evidenced in best practice publications.<sup>3</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Outcomes from the new DFI clinic pilot -114 patients seen from February 2024 to February 2025:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>30% reduction in the use of IVABx &gt;6 weeks, with a 28% reduction in adverse drug events reported</p></li><li><p>15% increase in debridement interventions from expert podiatric intervention</p></li><li><p>21% reduction in amputation outcomes</p></li><li><p>Reduction in waiting time from referral from 8 weeks to 0 weeks</p></li></l></p><p>An audit of outcomes from the weekly in-patient diabetic foot ward round demonstrated improved decision making and provision of timely surgical intervention, reducing the length of stay for these in-patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Outcome</st><p>The results have demonstrated the impact of the new clinic in relieving the bottleneck in the pathway and improving treatment outcomes and patient experience. This clinic is now continuing as &lsquo;business as usual&rsquo;. Further improvements, including the use of locally applied antibiotic beads and the introduction of thermal imaging technology to the clinic are continuing.</p><p>Solving complex problems takes persistence and tenacity. Forming a strong team and using data, outcomes and experience to make the case for change are key. It takes courage to get started, but using improvement methodology to overcome action inhibition and starting small will build confidence as successes are demonstrated and celebrated.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p><inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">1-in-10 adults living with diabetes by 2030 | Diabetes UK</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p><inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">How to Improve: Model for Improvement | Institute for Healthcare Improvement</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Manu CA, Mustafa OG, Bates M, Vivian G, Mulholland N, Elias D, Huang DY, Deane C, Cavale N, Kavarthapu V, Rashid H, Edmonds M. Transformation of the multidisciplinary diabetic foot clinic into a multidisciplinary diabetic foot day unit: results from a service evaluation. <I>Int J Low Extrem Wounds.</I> 2014 Sep;<b>13</b>(3):173&ndash;9. doi: 10.1177/1534734614545877. Epub 2014 Aug 13. PMID: 25122161</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parsons, C., Greensmith, S., Bajaj, K., Das, G., Ritchie, L., Unnithan, A., Masucci, N., Nash, W., Huang, C., Farook, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.233</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.233</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[233 Breaking free - generating motivation and action for improvement - a case study: improving the diabetic foot infection pathway at Ashford and St Peters hospitals NHS foundation trust]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A174</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A174</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A29?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[43 Patient Participation in urine specific gravity screening for arginine vasopressin deficiency in a neurosurgical clinic]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A29?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Arginine vasopressin deficiency (AVP-D) is a common postoperative complication following pituitary surgery, characterized by hypotonic polyuria and electrolyte imbalance.<sup>1</sup> Early detection is crucial and typically relies on repeated urine specific gravity (SG) measurements using refractometers, which are time-consuming, require calibration, and contribute to nurse workload.<sup>2</sup> This study assessed the feasibility and diagnostic reliability of patient participation in SG screening using urine test strips.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We conducted a prospective cohort study at a Dutch academic hospital. A total of 110 postoperative pituitary surgery patients measured six urine samples within 24 hours using Combur-10&reg; urine test strips. Nurses independently performed parallel measurements using both test strips and an ATAGO MASTER-SUR/N&alpha; refractometer. Agreement between methods was analysed using weighted Kappa and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Training was provided to all ward nurses (n=60), and patients received instructions upon admission. Both patients and nurses completed satisfaction surveys.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>From 609 complete measurement sets, moderate agreement was found between patient test strips and refractometer readings (Kappa = 0.47; ICC = 0.69). Agreement between patient and nurse test strip readings was substantial (Kappa = 0.82; ICC = 0.89). No refractometer values below 1.005 g/l were observed when patients recorded SG values &ge;1.015 g/l, suggesting that patient measurements above this threshold reliably exclude hypotonic urine. This occurred in 57.5% of cases, indicating that nurse re-measurement could be safely omitted in over half of postoperative assessments. Patients reported high satisfaction (mean 7.8/10), indicating confidence in their ability to perform and interpret SG readings. Nurses expressed moderate satisfaction (mean 6.4/10), with concerns about consistency and interpretation. Importantly, no significant differences were observed across patient subgroups, including age, gender, or educational level.</p></sec><sec><st>Discussion</st><p>These findings demonstrate that patient-led SG monitoring is both feasible and clinically safe when values are &ge;1.015 g/l. This strategy reduces nurse workload while enhancing patient engagement, without compromising diagnostic accuracy.<sup>3</sup> The approach aligns with growing evidence supporting patient participation in postoperative care and has the potential to shift routine tasks from staff to patients under well-defined protocols.<sup>4 5</sup>  </p><p>Future studies should assess the long-term impact of this strategy, including its applicability in home monitoring post-discharge and its integration with digital tools for remote follow-up. Furthermore, implementation research should explore barriers to adoption in clinical teams, particularly regarding trust in patient-conducted diagnostics.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Fountas A, Coulden A, Fern&aacute;ndez-Garc&iacute;a S, Tsermoulas G, Allotey J, Karavitaki N. Central diabetes insipidus (vasopressin deficiency) after surgery for pituitary tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis. <I>European Journal of Endocrinology</I> 2024;<b>19</b>1(1):S1-S13.</p></li><li><p>George JW. The usefulness and limitations of hand-held refractometers in veterinary laboratory medicine: an historical and technical review. <I>Veterinary Clinical Pathology</I> 2001;<b>30</b>(4):201&ndash;10.</p></li><li><p>Eberman L, Emerson D, Cleary M. Comparison of refractometry, urine color, and urine reagent strips to urine osmolality for measurement of urinary concentration. <I>Athletic Training &amp; Sports Health Care</I> 2009;<b>1</b>:267&ndash;71.</p></li><li><p>Hibbard JH, Greene J. What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. <I>Health Aff (Millwood)</I> 2013;<b>32</b>(2):207&ndash;14.</p></li><li><p>Oxelmark L, Ulin K, Chaboyer W, Bucknall T, Ringdal M. Registered nurses&rsquo; experiences of patient participation in hospital care: supporting and hindering factors patient participation in care. <I>Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences</I> 2018;<b>32</b>(2):612&ndash;21.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nollen, J.-M., Brunsveld-Reinders, A. H., Biermasz, N. R., Verstegen, M. J., Leijtens, E., Peul, W. C., Steyerberg, E. W., Furth, W. R. v.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.43</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.43</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[43 Patient Participation in urine specific gravity screening for arginine vasopressin deficiency in a neurosurgical clinic]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A29</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A30</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A31?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[46 Enhancing efficiency in medical admission processes: a quality improvement project in the zones and gems unit in the emergency department]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A31?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Efficient management of medical admissions in emergency departments (ED) is challenging, often leading to crowding and delays. Targeted staffing interventions have been shown to improve patient flow and reduce waiting times.<sup>1 2</sup> This quality improvement project at University Hospital Limerick (UHL) aimed to streamline admissions in the ED and Geriatric Emergency Medicine Service (GEMS) unit through strategic staffing changes informed by comprehensive data collection and staff feedback.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We used a pre-post intervention design. Over a 30-day baseline period, data were collected on total admissions, patient flow times (e.g., from check-in to medical admission), staffing levels, and the number of patients waiting during handover times at 08:00 AM and 08:30 PM. An initial survey of Senior House Officers (SHOs) highlighted staffing shortfalls during evening and night shifts. Two interventions were implemented: adding an extra SHO to under-resourced weekday night shifts and engaging Non-Consultant Hospital Doctors (NCHDs) in proofreading the on-call rota to pre-empt coverage gaps&mdash;an approach associated with improved staff satisfaction and efficiency.<sup>3</sup> The same metrics were recorded for 30 days post-intervention, and a follow-up SHO survey assessed the impact on staff satisfaction. A repeat study assessing the impact of additional weekend night staffing is currently in progress.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Total medical admissions increased from 832 (baseline) to 944 post-intervention, increasing the daily average from 27.7 to 31.5. There was a marked reduction in the number of patients waiting for admission during the 8:00 AM handover on weekdays, and all on-call rota gaps were eliminated. SHO feedback was overwhelmingly positive, reporting smoother admission processes and strongly advocating for extending the extra staffing to weekend night shifts. Preliminary data from the repeat study suggest further reductions in wait times and increased admission efficiency during weekends.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Strategic staffing interventions driven by data and staff feedback significantly enhanced the efficiency of medical admissions at UHL. The added weeknight SHO and proactive rota management led to higher admission throughput and alleviated bottlenecks in patient flow. Based on these positive outcomes, a repeat study implementing additional weekend night staffing is currently in progress to further augment and sustain the improvements. These findings align with broader evidence that process changes can help reduce ED crowding and improve operational performance.<sup>4 5</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Allaudeen N, Vashi A, Breckenridge JS, Haji-Sheikhi F, Wagner S, Posley K, Asch SM. Using lean management to reduce emergency department length of stay for medicine admissions. <I>Quality Management in Health Care</I> 2017;<b>26</b>(2):91&ndash;96. doi:10.1097/QMH.0000000000000132</p></li><li><p>Nassief K, Azer M, Watts M, Tuala E, McLennan P, Curtis K. Emergency department care-related causal factors of in-patient deterioration. <I>Australian Health Review</I> 2022;<b>46</b>(1):35&ndash;41. doi:10.1071/AH21190</p></li><li><p>Fujimori R, Liu K, Soeno S, Naraba H, Shirakawa T, Hara K, Goto T. Acceptance and barriers of AI-based decision support systems in emergency departments: a quantitative and qualitative evaluation. <I>Annals of Emergency Medicine</I> 2021;<b>78</b>(4 Suppl):S55. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.09.145</p></li><li><p>van der Linden MC, van Loon-van Gaalen M, Richards JR, van Woerden G, van der Linden N. Effects of process changes on emergency department crowding in a changing world: an interrupted time-series analysis. <I>International Journal of Emergency Medicine</I> 2023;<b>16</b>(1):6. doi:10.1186/s12245-023-00479-z</p></li><li><p>Collins J. Improving emergency department throughput: using a pull method of patient flow (Doctoral project, University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences). (2021).</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Varghese, S., Loughman, P., Cinnamond, K., Veerasamy, K. C., Quin, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.46</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.46</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[46 Enhancing efficiency in medical admission processes: a quality improvement project in the zones and gems unit in the emergency department]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A31</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A31</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A35?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[51 The trust second victim support program in emirates health services]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A35?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Healthcare organizations, including Emirates Health Services (EHS) facilities, encounter errors that can affect patients and staff. These errors significantly impact patients&lsquo; health and can also affect the mental wellbeing of healthcare providers (HCPs). Consequently, the leaders at EHS are committed to delivering high-quality, evidence-based psychological support to those we refer to as &lsquo;second victims&rsquo;.</p><p>The term &lsquo;second victim&rsquo; was introduced by Wu A. W. in 2000 (Wu A. W., 2000). He recognized the profound effects that adverse events can have on HCPs, which may include increased anxiety, loss of confidence, sleep disturbances, diminished job satisfaction, and an elevated risk of making subsequent errors (Wu A. W., 2000). Previous research indicated that at least 50% of HCPs experienced the second victim phenomenon at some point in their careers (Wu et al., 2013). According to Matlow AG et al. (2012), adverse events occur at a rate of 7.5 per 100 adult admissions and 9.2 per 100 pediatric admissions in Canada. These events have long been considered pivotal moments for patients and healthcare providers.</p><p>As a Joint Commission International (JCI) accredited organization, EHS strongly emphasizes providing comprehensive support for staff impacted by adverse or sentinel events. In response to a critical need within our healthcare framework, we adopted the TRUST support program (Denham CR, 2016), which focuses on supporting second victims. It&rsquo;s structured into three tiers: immediate aid (Tier 1), peer support (Tier 2), and personalized sessions (Tier 3). The TRUST program was a cornerstone of our organization and is specifically designed to assist these individuals, highlighting their importance and our commitment to their well-being.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim</st><p>The TRUST program aims to create a culture where employees are resilient and supportive before, during, and after sentinel events. Also, the EHS seeks to empower peer workers to lead support sessions, as they are effective in helping second victims due to their familiarity with clinical issues.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The TRUST support program was launched on September 27, 2019, with the support of the General Director of EHS, marking a significant milestone. Hospital directors collaborated to appoint second victim coordinators, signaling the beginning of a new era of support and resilience.</p><p>In the first stage of the TRUST program, the central committee was established and approved. This phase focused on developing the program&lsquo;s policies, procedures, and executive plan. We then began the recruitment and training of second victim coordinators. Rigorous selection criteria were set, candidates were interviewed, and training programs were implemented, emphasizing the preparation of coordinators to effectively support second victims.</p><p>The second stage marked the program&lsquo;s official launch, during which strategic initiatives were implemented at both the organizational and facility levels. The TRUST program became fully operational in 2021, providing support across EHS facilities. Coordinators received ongoing training and guidance from the central committee. Key performance indicators were evaluated, and surveys were conducted to identify challenges within the program, with a focus on assessing its effectiveness and identifying areas for improvement.</p><p>The third stage emphasizes maintaining stability and ensuring the program&lsquo;s lasting impact. Regular committee meetings are scheduled to develop strategies for enhancement. Additionally, monthly meetings with second victim coordinators are held to address challenges and share progress. Feedback from service users is collected through surveys to support the continuous improvement of the program.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The first Key Performance Indicators (KPI) focuses on the utilization of Second Victim Coordinator Support (Tier 2). Since the inception of the TRUST program, Tier 2 support has been utilized by:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>2022: 33 second victims across EHS hospitals</p></li><li><p>2023: 36 second victims across EHS hospitals</p></li><li><p>2024: 28 second victims across EHS hospitals</p></li></l></p><p>The second KPI measures the effectiveness of the Second Victim Coordinator Support (Tier 2). The effectiveness of Tier 2 support has improved significantly, increasing from 75% 2022 to 87% in 2023 and 93% in 2024. It is noteworthy that during Q4 2023, no second victims utilized the service.</p><p>The third KPI examines the retention of second victims. From 2022 to Q1 2024, there have been no individuals who departed from the organization within one year of being involved in a serious event and who also utilized Tier 2 support.</p></sec><sec><st>In conclusion</st><p>The TRUST program has expanded to include 17 hospitals, 8 primary healthcare centres, 6 specialized dental centres, and 6 public health centres across EHS. The number of healthcare professionals joining as second victim coordinators is also rising. This program has provided timely support to address employees&rsquo; immediate needs, as measured by the number of support sessions related to sentinel events. It ensures that second victims understand their good intentions and can rely on their leaders for integrity, fairness, and shared accountability.</p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Wu AW. Medical error: the second victim. The doctor who makes the mistake needs help too. <I>BMJ</I> (Clinical research ed.), 2000;<b>320</b>(7237):726&ndash;727. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.726</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Seys D, Wu AW, Van Gerven E, Vleugels A, Euwema M, Panella M, Scott SD, Conway J, Sermeus W, Vanhaecht K. Health care professionals as second victims after adverse events: a systematic review. <I>Evaluation &amp; the Health Professions</I> 2013;<b>36</b>(2):135&ndash;162. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278712458918</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Wu AW, Boyle DJ, Wallace G, Mazor KM. Disclosure of adverse events in the United States and Canada: an update, and a proposed framework for improvement. <I>Journal of Public Health Research</I> 2013;<b>2</b>(3):e32. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2013.e32</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Matlow AG, Baker GR, Flintoft V, Cochrane D, Coffey M, Cohen E, Nijssen-Jordan C. Adverse events among children in Canadian hospitals: the Canadian paediatric adverse events study. <I>Canadian Medical Association Journal</I> 2012;<b>184</b>(13):E709-E718. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.112153</p></li><li><p>Denham CR. TRUST: the 5 rights of the second victim.. <I>J Patient Saf.</I> 2008;<b>3</b>(2). doi:10.1097/01.jps.0000236917.02321.fd.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alshamsi, A. I., Alneaimi, A., Dawood, D., Joannidi, H., AlAttal, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.51</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.51</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[51 The trust second victim support program in emirates health services]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A35</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A36</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A37?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[54 Integrated care for patients with amputations of the lower limb]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A37?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>In the Netherlands, annually 3300 patients undergo an amputation of (parts of) their lower limb(s). About half of the patients that undergo amputation will, eventually, function with a prothesis. In the care and treatment for patients with lower limb amputations several problems can be detected: 1) Several methods for preparing the stump are available and applied with different costs. Post operative liners cost 250 per patient, while other methods cost between 1800 and 6600 per patient; 2) time between the amputation and being ready to start rehabilitation (stump is ready for prothesis fitting and training) is long; 4) geriatric care facilities in the region treat a small number of patients. Building experience and knowledge is therefore limited, while preparing the stump requires specific knowledge and expertise; 5) are spread across care organisation, and seem to get lost down the pathway and not receiving a prothesis.</p><p>In the south-east region of Netherlands a collaboration between hospitals, organisations providing geriatric rehabilitation, 2 prosthetist organisations and 1 rehabilitation centre was established and regional agreements regarding the care and care pathway for patients with amputations were made. In practice the regional care pathway implicates that patients who undergo an amputation 1) are screened for a post operative liner as preparation method for the stump 2) are prepared for transfers from and to care organisations between the collaboration organisations by receiving predetermined information leaflets and oral information</p><p>3) patients are admitted to dedicated geriatric care facilities in order to prepare patients for outpatient rehabilitation in the rehabilitation centre.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>In order to see whether the outcomes of patients who received care within the care pathway differed from patients who did not receive care within the pathway, we compared patient characteristics, clinical characteristics and outcomes for patient, rehabilitation centre and costs of patients who received care within the care pathway with historical data of patients who did not receive care within the pathway, but with a similar level of amputation to ensure comparability.</p><p>In addition, we measured patient satisfaction with care in the hospital, nursing home and rehabilitation centre; and to which degree patients felt prepared for the transfers between hospital to nursing home and rehabilitation centre.</p><p>Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, presenting numbers, percentages, means and/or medians.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Between April 2022 and September 2024 34 patients received care within the care pathway; 85% was male and with an average age of 66 years. Level of amputation was in 90% a transtibial amputation and 90% had a peripheral vascular aetiology.</p><p>Patients not treated in the care pathway. Of patients that were not treated in within the care pathway 74% was male and average age was 66 years.</p><p>Of the 34 patients in the care pathway 21 (62%) were transferred to a geriatric rehabilitation facility (nursing home) after the amputation in the hospital in comparison to 37% of patients who did receive care in the pathway. Almost all patient in the care pathway received a post-operative liner (n=32, 94%), in comparison to 29% of the patients not within the care pathway.</p><p>Median number of days between the amputation of the limb and the start of the outpatient rehabilitation was 53 days for patients within the care pathway and 60 days for patients not treated withing the care pathway. The median time between the amputation and receiving the prothesis was 106 days for patients within the care pathway and 122 days for patients not within the care pathway. Duration of the outpatient rehabilitation was 64 and 66 days for patients in within the care pathway and patients not within the care pathway, respectively. Patient satisfaction was high, between 84% and 100% was satisfied with care and 88% felt prepared for transfers.</p></sec><sec><st>Discussion</st><p>Collaboration between different care organisations involved is possible and has a positive effect on patient outcomes, satisfaction, health care process and costs, but requires dedication and involvement of all parties.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haaf, D. t., Nijssen, I., Utens, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.54</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.54</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[54 Integrated care for patients with amputations of the lower limb]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A37</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A38</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A38?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[55 Rainbow lessons: scaling an intervention to improve access to primary health care in Alberta, Canada]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A38?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Context</st><p>Embedded in a Canadian provincial health system that is committed to delivering Primary Health Care (PHC) through teams of providers, the Crowfoot Village Family Practice (CVFP) is a full-service primary care clinic in Calgary, Alberta. CVFP is financed through an alternative relationship plan (ARP) that pays a salary, derived from blended capitation, to physicians.</p></sec><sec><st>PROBLEM</st><p>In 2023 CVFP had more than 4000 potential patients on its waiting list, each hoping to be attached to a clinic physician. <b>ASSESSMENT:</b> In an effort to reduce this waiting list and improve access to team-based PHC, CVFP medical leaders and staff at the clinic began creating a new care delivery model named <I>Project Rainbow</I> (<I>Rainbow</I>). <b>ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS:</b>  <I>Rainbow</I>&rsquo;s designers began with the assumption that family physician time and availability were the major rate-limiting factors that were preventing patients from becoming attached to CVFP&rsquo;s multi-disciplinary team of PHC providers. <b>INTERVENTION:</b> In a provincial system that generally equates <I>physician access</I> with <I>PHC access</I>, <I>Rainbow</I> innovated by making non-physician health care professionals the first point of contact for new patients. <b>PATIENT INVOLVEMENT:</b> A sub-set of patients on the waiting list were directly engaged about their willingness to participate in <I>Rainbow</I>, with a volunteer from that subgroup invited to serve on an advisory committee for the project. <b>STRATEGY FOR CHANGE AND OUTCOMES:</b> A robust data collection program shows the waiting list reduced significantly, as CVFP nurses &ndash; under the supervision of physicians &ndash; became first points of contact.</p><p>This poster does not describe the specific interventions or the data collection activities that the CVFP team undertook in partnership with patients to ease the bottleneck and create a non-physician first point of contact. Both activities are ongoing and highly specific to CVFP&rsquo;s finances, operations, and team structures. Instead, we draw out more broadly applicable lessons.</p><p>We report on key facilitators of, and barriers to, <I>Rainbow</I> thriving in the clinic and scaling beyond its home ARP environment into the predominant fee-for-service financing of the provincial system. What follows is based on qualitative observation and interview data gathered by an embedded health services action researcher who worked alongside the CVPF team during the design and early implementation of <I>Rainbow</I> between August 2023 and February 2024. Understanding these facilitators and barriers is important to scaling <I>Rainbow&rsquo;s</I> successes to meet the challenge of a nation-wide crisis in access to PHC.</p><p>A <b>FACILITATOR</b> of <I>Rainbow&rsquo;s</I> local success &ndash; one also aimed at enabling its spread beyond the CVFP &ndash; was the collection and use of data. Data were purposively collected to course-correct internally as well as to drive awareness and excitement about <I>Rainbow</I> in the external policy environment. Key <b>BARRIERS</b> to achieving local QI goals and scaling Rainbow beyond the clinic included workforce Human Resource (HR) issues, cultural/governance issues, and finance model issues.</p></sec><sec><st>HR ISSUES</st><p>It is unclear how existing efforts to improve physician recruitment and retention can be extended and leveraged to ensure not just family physicians, but the full range of PHC team members, are attracted to and sustainably integrated into programs like <I>Rainbow</I>. <b>CULTURAL/GOVERNANCE ISSUES:</b> Implementing <I>Rainbow</I> required the enactment of a culture of innovation and multi-disciplinary teamwork. Understanding how that culture and mental models that support novel distributions of professional authority and autonomy can be transmitted and supported with policy is central to achieving spread and scale. Amendments to scopes of practice, monopoly and competition frameworks, and learning environments that rewrite cultural norms by deconstructing hierarchical mental models to facilitate truly multi-disciplinary interaction require consideration. <b>FINANCE MODEL ISSUES:</b> Spreading CVFP&rsquo;s ARP model is likely a necessary condition to enable scaling. Simply &lsquo;fixing&rsquo; the finances, however, is unlikely to be sufficient. How to reform finances so that they support the resolution of workforce and cultural/governance issues remains an open question.</p></sec><sec><st>KEY MESSAGES</st><p>HR, Culture, and Finance issues are intertwined barriers to scaling a PHC access improving program in Alberta, Canada. More generally, embedded qualitative action researchers can help QI teams seeking to scale programs by co-identifying facilitators and barriers that go beyond the local.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflicts of Interest</st><p>This work was funded by the Alberta Innovates Health Solutions Fund, and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p></sec><sec><st>Ethics Approval</st><p>Ethics approval was obtained from the University of Calgary Research Ethics Board (REB22-1385)</p><p>The authors acknowledge that they have seen and agree to the license applied to conference abstracts published by BMJ.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leslie, M., McDonald, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.55</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.55</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[55 Rainbow lessons: scaling an intervention to improve access to primary health care in Alberta, Canada]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A38</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A39</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A39?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[56 Prioritizing healthcare professionals wellbeing: the development of a standardized debriefing tool following critical events]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A39?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Healthcare professionals have experienced high levels of emotional, physical, and mental hardships pre- and post-pandemic. Particularly, there have been high levels of moral distress, secondary traumatic stress, compassion fatigue, and burnout within groups who experience a high volume of critical events.<sup>1 2</sup> Critical events are those that can induce stress or hardship to a healthcare professional, including, but not limited to respiratory or cardiac resuscitations, unforeseen patient deaths, medical futility, medical errors, and patient/visitor violence. High levels of critical events can lead to decreased job satisfaction and intention to leave healthcare, as well as decreased wellbeing and mental health concerns.<sup>3</sup> This not only affects individual professionals but has a ripple effect on the healthcare system and patients. Healthcare professional burnout is widespread and has become one of the top priorities of the United States Surgeon General&rsquo;s office.<sup>4</sup> It is imperative that the mental health and wellbeing of healthcare professionals be prioritized, and interventions implemented.</p><p>One intervention that has shown benefits in moral distress, secondary traumatic stress, compassion fatigue, and burnout of healthcare professionals is debriefing.<sup>3&ndash;6</sup> Debriefing after critical events can be done immediately after an event, or days to weeks after an event.<sup>6</sup> Implementation of a post-critical event debriefing process has shown increases in compassion and work satisfaction levels of staff.<sup>6</sup> According to multiple studies, moral distress levels decreased following regular debriefing sessions within a variety of hospital units.<sup>5 7</sup> By allowing staff to participate in a comprehensive debriefing, it can provide an opportunity to process emotions and potentially overcome moral distress and other wellbeing threats.<sup>7</sup> Additionally, there were improvements in staff sick time used and decreased staff vacancies.<sup>8</sup> Therefore, this study aimed to develop an evidenced-based standardized debriefing tool for use after critical events to promote healthcare professional mental health and wellbeing. This study received institutional review board approval as exempt.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>An evidenced-based standardized debriefing tool was developed by integrating two established frameworks to guide post-critical incident discussions in healthcare settings. The first framework is the U.S. Surgeon General&rsquo;s framework for workplace mental health and wellbeing. It comprises five essential categories necessary for optimal employee wellbeing and mental health.<sup>9</sup> The categories include protection from harm, connection and community, work-life harmony, mattering at work, and opportunity for growth.<sup>9</sup> The second framework utilized in the debriefing tool is derived from a five-phase educational debriefing model for medical simulations. These phases include an introduction to debriefing, a defusing phase, a discovering phase, a deepening phase, and a closing phase of debriefing.<sup>10</sup>  </p><p>Using a modified Delphi design, an interdisciplinary expert panel of seven healthcare professionals with expertise in critical events, peer support, debriefing, or healthcare professional burnout in the healthcare setting was convened. During the first survey round, the panel evaluated the quality and rigor of the debriefing tool. During the second round, the tool was evaluated for content, clarity, and functionality according to the Mini-Checklist (MiChe), a validated instrument with high interrater reliability (ICC = 0.755; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.001) in appraising methodological guideline quality.<sup>11</sup> Consensus was defined as 80% or greater agreement among raters.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Greater than 80% consensus was achieved in round one quantitative questions with a Gwets-AC2 of 0.93 for interrater reliability. Thematic analysis using the Braun and Clarke methodology was performed for qualitative questions which guided revisions to the debriefing tool. Round two resulted in 100% consensus for all questions.</p><p>The use of this evidence-based debriefing tool could significantly reduce provider burnout by creating structured opportunities for emotional processing and peer support following critical events. This focus on professional wellbeing through structured debriefing could lead to improved job satisfaction, reduced turnover, and ultimately, more resilient healthcare teams. The development of this evidence-based debriefing tool has highlighted several potential implementation considerations. We anticipate that success will depend on early stakeholder engagement, dedicated training time for staff, and clear integration into existing workflows. Strong leadership support and champions within each department would be crucial for driving adoption. Regular feedback mechanisms and flexibility to adapt the tool based on user experience would be essential for sustained implementation. Lastly, consideration of resource constraints, particularly time pressures in clinical settings, would need to be carefully addressed in the implementation strategy. These anticipated challenges and success factors could inform the future implementation plan for the debriefing tool.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Epstein EG, Haizlip J, Liaschenko J, Zhao D, Bennett R, Faith M. Moral Distress, Mattering, and Secondary Traumatic Stress in Provider Burnout: A Call for Moral Community. <I>AACN ADV CRIT CARE</I> 2020;<b>31</b>(2):146&ndash;157. doi:<inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">10.4037/aacnacc2020285</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Harvey G, Tapp DM. Exploring the meaning of critical incident stress experienced by intensive care unit nurses. <I>Nursing Inquiry</I> 2020;<b>27</b>(4):e12365. doi:<inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">10.1111/nin.12365</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Arbios D, Srivastava J, Gray E, Murray P, Ward J. Cumulative stress debriefings to combat compassion fatigue in a pediatric intensive care unit. <I>AM J CRIT CARE</I> 2022;<b>31</b>(2):111&ndash;118. doi:<inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">10.4037/ajcc2022560</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Health Worker Burnout. U.S. department of health and human services. Office of the Surgeon General. Updated on August 2, 2024. Accessed on October 28, 2024. https://www.hhs.gov/surgeongeneral/priorities/health-worker-burnout/index.html</p></li><li><p>Browning ED, Cruz JS. Reflective debriefing: a social work intervention addressing moral distress among ICU nurses. <I>Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life &amp; Palliative Care</I> 2018;<b>14</b>(1):44&ndash;72. doi:<inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">10.1080/15524256.2018.1437588</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Nerovich C, Derrington SF, Sorce LR, Manzardo J, Manworren RCB. Debriefing after critical events is feasible and associated with increased compassion satisfaction in the pediatric intensive care unit. <I>Crit Care Nurse</I> 2023;<b>43</b>(3):19&ndash;27. doi:<inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">10.4037/ccn2023842</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Shashidhara S, Kirk S. Moral distress: a framework for offering relief through debrief. doi:<inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">10.1086/JCE2020314364</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Folz E. Implementation of a critical incidence stress management program at a tertiary care hospital. <I>CAN J CRIT CARE NURS</I>. 2018;<b>29</b>(2):37&ndash;38.</p></li><li><p>Workplace Mental Health &amp; Well-Being. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Surgeon General. Updated on May 30, 2024. https://www.hhs.gov/surgeongeneral/priorities/workplace-well-being/index.html</p></li><li><p>Zigmont JJ, Kappus LJ, Sudikoff SN. The 3D Model of Debriefing: Defusing, Discovering, and Deepening. <I>Seminars in Perinatology</I> 2011;<b>35</b>(2):52&ndash;58. doi:<inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">10.1053/j.semperi.2011.01.003</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Siebenhofer A, Semlitsch T, Herborn T, Siering U, Kopp I, Hartig J. Validation and reliability of a guideline appraisal mini-checklist for daily practice use. <I>BMC Med Res Methodol.</I> 2016;<b>16</b>(1):39. doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0139-x</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wood, N., Pelt, M. v., Morris, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.56</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.56</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[56 Prioritizing healthcare professionals wellbeing: the development of a standardized debriefing tool following critical events]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A39</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A40</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A40?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[57 Using multi-strategy methods to improve the effectiveness of early intervention for childrens diagnosis process]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A40?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Research Objective</st><p>Early diagnosis and intervention for children with developmental delays are crucial to their future development. Early intervention services are structured, continuous support systems that include developmental screening, referral, assessment, intervention, and family support. This study aims to utilize multi-strategy methods to improve the process of early intervention diagnosis for children, reduce waiting times, and minimize discomfort in children due to long wait times for assessments or treatments. By implementing specific strategies, the study seeks to enhance the efficiency of early intervention scheduling, improve referral quality, and promote the integration of medical resources and the graded medical system, ultimately improving overall healthcare quality.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods and Strategies</st><p>The team introduced a multi-theme and modular learning program, allowing personnel to choose their own learning topics. In 2023, in collaboration with the Quality Management Center and the Teaching and Research Department, the team focused on high-risk units by conducting case reviews, medical record checks, on-site inspections, and staff interviews to identify issues. Key problems identified include insufficient or unfamiliar emergency supplies, unclear team responsibilities, unfamiliarity with emergency procedures, and limited emergency space, all affecting emergency response accuracy.</p><p>In response to these issues, the team re-engineered the process and improved resource management. They simulated practices in the early intervention center to refine the children&rsquo;s early diagnosis process. The improvements included:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>  <b>Meetings and Discussions</b>  </p><p>The team reviewed the current process and identified key issues:</p><p><l type="circle"><li><p>Space was too small and crowded</p></li><li><p>Unclear patient flow</p></li><li><p>Lack of privacy in social worker consultations</p></li></l></p></li><li><p>  <b>Process Adjustments</b>  </p><p><l type="circle"><li><p>Due to limited space, time-segmented scheduling was adopted, notifying parents of their recommended arrival time to avoid crowding.</p></li><li><p>A &lsquo;Children&rsquo;s Development Joint Assessment Clinic Process Chart&rsquo; was created for parents, and station signage was posted at the early intervention center to clarify the process.</p></li><li><p>Adjusted patient flow by adding more waiting seats and providing a private consultation space, enhancing both privacy and the convenience of medical visits.</p></li></l></p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Following the implementation of multi-strategy interventions, patient satisfaction slightly increased from 88.7% to 87.8%. Although the numbers show slight fluctuation, the introduction of SMS notifications significantly reduced early arrivals and prolonged wait times. Additionally, overcrowding was reduced, and waiting areas were expanded, alongside the creation of a private consultation space, which helped alleviate on-site chaos. Parents, having a clearer understanding of the diagnosis process and locations, reduced frequent inquiries, which in turn minimized interruptions during staff work and saved valuable work time, enhancing overall efficiency.</p></sec><sec><st>Specific outcomes include</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Increased patient satisfaction</p></li><li><p>Reduced waiting times</p></li><li><p>Time savings for staff</p></li><li><p>Fewer interruptions during work</p></li><li><p>Improved privacy in consultations</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Discussion</st><p>Children&rsquo;s developmental assessments and early intervention are integrative services provided for preschool children with suspected or confirmed developmental delays and their families. Through cross-disciplinary collaboration among healthcare, education, and social welfare, these services promote the healthy physical and mental development of children, reduce future potential disabilities, and provide necessary support and care for families. As most modern families are dual-income, effectively reducing waiting times and clarifying the early intervention process for parents can significantly reduce their stress and travel burden, while enhancing the healthcare experience and overall quality of medical care.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wu, W.-C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.57</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.57</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[57 Using multi-strategy methods to improve the effectiveness of early intervention for childrens diagnosis process]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A40</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A41</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A42?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[60 Identifying best practices from positive family feedback: a model for improving care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A42?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Patient satisfaction is a critical indicator of the quality of care provided by healthcare facilities. Positive patient experiences are linked to higher levels of trust in healthcare providers. In particular, family feedback offers valuable insights into the effectiveness of care provided by hospitals. This study aims to identify the top positive practices in patient care, as reflected by family feedback at Changi General Hospital, focusing on the wards in the Integrated Building, and develop a model for improving care in hospital. This research analyses 820 positive feedback instances from 2023, focusing on identifying the most appreciated behaviours and suggesting a replicable model for enhancing patient care.</p><p>From the family feedback analysis, the top five best practices for patient care identified were: &lsquo;caring&rsquo;, &lsquo;helpful&rsquo;, &lsquo;kind&rsquo;, &lsquo;patient&rsquo; and &lsquo;friendly&rsquo;. These practices emphasized the importance of emotional and interpersonal aspects of care.</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>In contrast, the survey of healthcare professionals revealed a different set of priorities. The top five practices ranked by healthcare staff were: &lsquo;detailed&rsquo;, &lsquo;competent&rsquo;, &lsquo;efficient&rsquo;, &lsquo;patient&rsquo;, and &lsquo;kind&rsquo;. While there was some overlap in valuing patience and kindness, the professionals placed a stronger emphasis on technical and procedural aspects such as competence, efficiency, and providing detailed care. Notably, the themes of competence and efficiency, which were ranked highly by staff, appeared infrequently in family feedback, with only 11 and 9 mentions respectively. This prompts further exploration of what families value most in a hospital experience.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Background</st><p>Changi General Hospital (CGH), a major tertiary care institution in Singapore, has continually emphasised patient-centred care, aiming to improve both clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Family feedback, particularly from recently discharged patients, is an invaluable source of qualitative data that provides direct insight into caregiver performance. The Integrated Building focuses on looking after geriatric patients. By analysing the feedback that have been given by patients and families of patients who have recently been discharged from hospital, healthcare providers can systematically incorporate best practices into hospital operations, thereby enhancing patient-centred care across the institution.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This retrospective study focuses on 820 instances of positive family feedback for patients discharged from the Integrated Building at CGH in 2023. The dataset, extracted from family feedback forms, was filtered to include only those related to patient experiences at Integrated Building wards. Using Google Sheets, feedback was categorised based on thematic analysis, where recurring phrases and words were grouped into overarching themes. Feedback that did not mention specific positive practices, or only mentioned &lsquo;good&rsquo; were excluded from the analysis.</p><p>The top five most frequently mentioned positive practices&mdash; &lsquo;caring&rsquo;, &lsquo;helpful&rsquo;, &lsquo;kind&rsquo;, &lsquo;patient&rsquo; and &lsquo;friendly&rsquo;&mdash;were identified through a combination of manual analysis and word frequency counts. Themes were further visualised using a word cloud (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>) and infographic (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>) to highlight key practices and provide a clear model of care. A qualitative assessment was conducted to explore how these practices contribute to positive patient experiences.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The analysis identified five key positive caregiving behaviours that were consistently praised in family feedback: &lsquo;caring&rsquo;, &lsquo;helpful&rsquo;, &lsquo;kind&rsquo;, &lsquo;patient&rsquo; and &lsquo;friendly&rsquo;. These practices were not only the most frequently mentioned but also appeared in combination across different contexts of care, underscoring their importance in shaping patient and family perceptions.</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Caring: This practice was the most frequently mentioned, appearing 164 times. Families frequently expressed appreciation for the emotional support provided by staff, particularly in terms of attentiveness and empathy toward patients&lsquo; needs. An example of the feedback was &lsquo;Showed care to patients despite being busy.&rsquo;</p></li><li><p>Helpful: Helpful behaviours were noted in 151 responses, especially in terms of practical assistance with daily tasks, timely responses to calls, and helping to ensure patient comfort. An example of the feedback was &lsquo;She was helpful, attentive, and had good bedside manner.&rsquo;</p></li><li><p>Kind: Descriptions of kindness appeared 146 times, with families frequently noting the warmth and compassion of staff in their interactions. An example of the feedback given was &lsquo;She was kind, treated me like her own family member.&rsquo;</p></li><li><p>Patient: In 103 instances, staff were praised for their patience, especially in dealing with patients who were aggressive, or in explanations to family members. An example of the feedback was &lsquo;Patient, took time to explain situation clearly.&rsquo;</p></li><li><p>Friendly: Friendliness, mentioned 95 times, was highly valued for creating a welcoming and comfortable environment for both patients and their families. It was mentioned that friendly interactions helped reduce anxiety of both patients and their families and made their hospital stays more pleasant. An example of the feedback given was &lsquo;She was cheerful and friendly, allowing me to feel at ease.&rsquo;</p></li></l></p><p>The visual mapping through the infographic and word cloud highlights how they collectively shape a positive caregiving experience. The word cloud emphasised &lsquo;caring&rsquo; and &lsquo;helpful&rsquo; as the most dominant practices, followed closely by &lsquo;kind&rsquo;, &lsquo;patient&rsquo; and &lsquo;friendly&rsquo;. The infographic provides a structural model that hospitals can replicate, outlining these practices as core components of a patient-centred approach to care.</p><p>By contrast, the themes of &lsquo;competence&rsquo; and &lsquo;efficiency&rsquo;, typically regarded as crucial to care quality, were mentioned only 11 and 9 times, respectively. While these qualities were certainly appreciated, they were not the primary focus of positive feedback, suggesting that patients and families may expect competence and efficiency as fundamental aspects of care and are more likely to commend exceptional emotional support.</p><p>We have also surveyed 20 healthcare professionals comprising of nurses, doctors, physiotherapists, dieticians, speech therapists- and asked them to rank what they believe to be the most important best practices in patient care. Interestingly, the top five practices that they ranked were &lsquo;detailed&rsquo;, &lsquo;competent&rsquo;, &lsquo;efficient&rsquo;, &lsquo;patient&rsquo;, &lsquo;kind&rsquo;. There seems to be a significant contrast between the best practices appreciated and valued by families versus those prioritized by healthcare professionals.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>This study highlights the importance of specific caregiving practices&mdash; &lsquo;caring&rsquo;, &lsquo;helpful&rsquo;, &lsquo;kind&rsquo;, &lsquo;patient&rsquo; and &lsquo;friendly&rsquo;&mdash;as essential to positive patient experiences at Changi General Hospital&lsquo;s Integrated Building. We have presented this as a infographic in <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F3">figure 3</cross-ref>.</p><p>While patient and families consistently highlighted the importance of being caring, helpful and kind, healthcare professionals believe that there is greater importance in competence, efficiency, and providing detailed care. This divergence suggests that while technical competence is expected as a baseline in healthcare, it is the emotional and interpersonal aspects of care that leaves lasting impression on families.</p><p>Hospitals seeking to improve patient satisfaction should prioritise training programs that enhance staffs&rsquo; interpersonal skills, with a specific focus on empathy, kindness, and patient-centred communication.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 60 Figure 1</no><link locator="60_F1"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 60 Figure 2</no><link locator="60_F2"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F3"><no>Abstract 60 Figure 3</no><link locator="60_F3"></fig></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ho, A. P., Lim, K. S., Chang, S. M., Yoon, P. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.60</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.60</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[60 Identifying best practices from positive family feedback: a model for improving care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A42</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A44</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A44?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[61 Royal hospital for women - revitalisation and co-design of hospital terrace as a wellbeing strategy for staff]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A44?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Nurses and doctors suffer from high levels of stress and burnout.<sup>1 2</sup> Reduced wellbeing in nurses is associated with 26% - 71% increase in medical errors, risk of mortality, and hospital acquired infections.<sup>3</sup> Green spaces have been shown to increase wellbeing, decrease loneliness, social isolation and burnout, reduce physical and psychological symptoms, and support physical activity;<sup>3&ndash;5</sup> green spaces can also be sources of social connection, preventing loneliness from occurring.<sup>6</sup>  </p><p>The Royal Hospital for Women (RHW) in Randwick, South Eastern Sydney, currently lacks sufficient green spaces within its ground. However, it has terraces that are currently unfit for purpose. This pilot study aims to measure wellbeing, perceptions, availability of outdoor spaces around the hospital, and enablers of green space use while at work, prior to refurbishing and revitalising the terraces. The project involves multidisciplinary research collaboration and partnership between the RHW Medical, Nursing, Midwifery, and Allied Health Professional Leads; University of New South Wales (UNSW) Faculties of Medicine and Health, Engineering, and Art, Design and Architecture; and an Indigenous-led architecture firm.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A quantitative research design was used. This included administering to hospital staff a ten-minute survey pre-terrace revitalisation to capture the outcomes of job stress and stressors, loneliness, nature connectedness, and associations with engagement with outdoor spaces at work, the perceived restorativeness of those spaces, and whether these are associated with other factors (e.g. demographics, duration of meal times, etc.).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>188 out of 812 staff members completed the survey over a ten-day period for a response rate of 23%. The results reveal a strong desire among staff for improved outdoor spaces, with 82.4% ideally wanting to eat outdoors and 83% indicating they would use outdoor spaces if they were greener. Current outdoor areas were found to lack support for psychological restoration, with 63% disagreeing that these areas were interesting or explorable. There were higher odds of perceived work stressors and lower odds of nature connection for staff who felt there wasn&rsquo;t an outdoor space to get away from the things that demanded their attention. 90% of staff expressed preferences for outdoor features such as seating, weather protection and green walls. Staff wellbeing was also a significant concern, with 36.7% feeling lonely, 27.7% stressed, and 26.6% disconnected from nature. Short break times were identified as a major barrier, with 53.8% of staff with less than 10-minute breaks reporting loneliness. Longer breaks were associated with reduced loneliness, dropping to 32.6% for those with longer than 10-minute breaks.</p><p>The findings suggest that enhancing outdoor spaces to support socialisation and restoration, along with providing longer and dedicated breaks, could potentially address issues of stress, loneliness, and nature disconnection among staff. The project team is currently working to identify funding to refurbish the terrace, turning the design into reality as an intervention to improve staff wellbeing.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Lim J, Bogossian F, Ahern K. Stress and coping in Australian nurses: a systematic review. <I>International Nursing Review</I> 2010;<b>57</b>(1):22&ndash;31.</p></li><li><p>Kumar S. Burnout and doctors: prevalence, prevention and intervention. <I>Healthcare</I> 2016;<b>4</b>(3):37.</p></li><li><p>Wood RE, Brown RE, Kinser PA. The connection between loneliness and burnout in nurses: an integrative review<I>. Applied Nursing Research</I> 2022;<b>66</b>:151609.</p></li><li><p>Nguyen P-Y, <I>et al</I>. Nature prescriptions: a scoping review with a nested meta-analysis.<I> MedRxiv</I> 2022. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.23.22272674</inter-ref>.</p></li><li><p>Markevych I, <I>et al</I>. Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: theoretical and methodological guidance. <I>Environmental Research</I> 2017;<b>158</b>:301&ndash;317.</p></li><li><p>Feng X, Astell-Burt T. Perceived qualities, visitation and felt benefits of preferred nature spaces during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia: a nationally-representative cross-sectional study of 2940 adults<I>. Land</I> 2022;<b>11</b>(6):904.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hsueh, W., Gasparotto, R., Pritchard, T., Feng, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.61</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.61</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[61 Royal hospital for women - revitalisation and co-design of hospital terrace as a wellbeing strategy for staff]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A44</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A45</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A46?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[64 Discussion and documentation of treatment limitations in elderly (70+) at the internal medicine department]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A46?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Following an in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), less than 20% of patients leave the hospital alive; among older and vulnerable patients, these outcomes are even worse, with a significantly higher likelihood of neurological sequelae.<sup>1&ndash;3</sup> Therefore, it is crucial for this patient group to carefully weigh, discuss, and document treatment limitations, such as resuscitation. According to the local protocol at the St Jansdal Hospital, treatment limitations must be verified upon every clinical admission.<sup>4</sup> However, in the emergency department, patients are often caught off guard by this question,<sup>5,6</sup> risking a reflexive response in which they express a desire for all possible treatments, without truly understanding the potential benefits and drawbacks. Patients frequently overestimate the success rate of resuscitation and are more likely to opt for a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order after receiving adequate information.<sup>7&ndash;9</sup> By improving the timing, communication, and documentation of treatment limitations, the quality of care can be significantly enhanced for older and vulnerable patients. This approach helps to prevent unnecessary or unwanted treatments, spares patients from suffering, and may ultimately (indirectly) lead to a reduction in healthcare costs.</p><p>This project was conducted in the Department of Internal Medicine at St Jansdal Hospital (Harderwijk, the Netherlands). The project team consisted of a hospitalist resident (author, project leader), a hospitalist, an internist-oncologist, and a nurse. Additionally, a geriatrician, intensivist, and emergency physician were involved.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Baseline measurement consisted of:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Clinical audit based on patient records (September 2023 and January 2024, to account for any effects of the Acute Care Unit (ACU) opening (November 2023)).</p></li><li><p>Interviews with physicians (n = 5) (January 2024), focusing on work as done vs. work as imagined.</p></li><li><p>Interviews with patients (n = 6) (January 2024): focusing on thoughts, experiences and recommendations regarding the discussion of treatment limitations.</p></li><li><p>Analysis of incident reports related to resuscitation and treatment limitations (January 2023&ndash;April 2024).</p></li><li><p>Benchmarking against other hospitals (n = 6)</p></li></l></p><p>Current problems were determined through fishbone analysis, followed by prioritizing possible improvement actions based on effectiveness and feasibility. Improvement actions were then implemented in multiple domains:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Electronic Patient Record (EPR): facilitating adequate documentation of treatment limitations (copying former information, checkbox option &lsquo;on medical grounds&rsquo;, mandatory indication of resuscitation yes/no) *</p></li><li><p>Training ward physicians by intensivists on the impact of resuscitation/intensive care admission.</p></li><li><p>Educational materials: revising patient brochure, combined with video. *</p></li><li><p>Work agreements (including making treatment limitations a standard item in the weekly grand round at the Internal Medicine Department).</p><p>*not completed by the time of the follow-up measurement</p></li></l></p><p>Follow-up measurement included repeating the clinical audit of patient records and interviewing physicians and patients, including feedback on the draft brochure.</p><p>Goals as stated beforehand were:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>&gt;90% of treatment limitations verified within 24 hours of admission.</p></li><li><p>&gt;75% of considerations regarding treatment limitations clearly documented.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Regarding 70-years-and-older patients, admitted for the Internal Medicine Department, the following data were recorded:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>&plusmn;80 admissions per month, median length of stay 6&ndash;7 days.</p></li><li><p>&gt;80% admitted through emergency department.</p></li><li><p>&lt;40% known to Internal Medicine outpatient clinic prior to admission.</p></li><li><p>&gt;80% of general practitioner referrals do not contain any information regarding previous discussion of treatment limitations.</p></li></l></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 64 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Shows timing of documentation of treatment limitations after clinical admission.</p></caption><link locator="64_F1"></fig></p><p><cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">Figure 1</cross-ref> shows timing of documentation of treatment limitations after clinical admission.</p><p>&plusmn;40% of treatment limitations not documented &lt;24 hours after admission, were &gt;1 year old</p><p>&plusmn;35% of patients do not have treatment limitations; +20% was DNR; &plusmn;30% had more extensive treatment limitations (DNR/Do Not Intubate/No ICU Admission).</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 64 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Shows whether or not considerations for treatment limitations were documented</p></caption><link locator="64_F2"></fig></p><p><cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">Figure 2</cross-ref> shows whether or not considerations for treatment limitations were documented.</p><p>However, it is often a quest: when information regarding considerations is available, it is rarely found in the intended location in the patient file (i.e. a note attached to the registration of treatment limitations): baseline 18&ndash;24%, follow-up measurement 33%. Mostly it is in the admission status at the emergency department or a separate note, which is not related to the actual documentation of treatment limitation. Therefor, it is highly likely that information cannot be found when needed in future treatment contacts.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and discussion</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Some improvement has been observed in the timely documentation of treatment limitations, but there is still significant progress to be made. Considerations remain poorly accessible.</p></li><li><p>Note: Implementation of improvement measures for the EPR and educational materials only took place in the autumn of 2024; an additional follow-up measurement was conducted after admission of the original abstract. However, this measurement did not show groundbreaking improvements.</p></li><li><p>Short Term recommendations for ensuring the sustainability of improvement actions and raising awareness include:</p><p><l type="circle"><li><p>Training of ward physicians within the annual education cycle.</p></li><li><p>Semi-annual hospital-wide audit rounds regarding discussion and documentation of treatment limitations. These will be conducted in April 2025, on the Departments of Surgery, Pulmonology, Cardiology and Neurology.</p></li></l></p></li><li><p>Long Term: structural attention for advance care planning, including transboundary aspects, is mandatory.</p></li></l></p><p>Furthermore, Key Takeaways from interviews are:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Physicians prefer objective (i.e. comorbidity such as metastastic cancer or end-stage heart failure) over subjective (i.e. functional, such as short walking distance, ADL-dependency) arguments for treatment limitations.</p></li><li><p>There is a sense of &lsquo;relief&rsquo; when any treatment limitation is already documented (and therefore, physicians are then less alert to the content).</p></li><li><p>Patients often think about treatment limitations, but they are more likely to discuss these with family members rather than the physician. Therefore: ask!</p></li><li><p>Know what your patient does not know (or remember): more than three-quarters forget the entire conversation and/or cannot explain what resuscitation entails.</p></li><li><p>Be aware of the importance of word choice and expectation management (especially when it comes to treatment limitations on medical grounds).</p></li><li><p>Educational materials should supplement, but not replace, the conversation.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Schluep, <I>et al</I>. One-year survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. <I>Resuscitation</I> 2018;<b>132</b>:90&ndash;100.</p></li><li><p>Jonsson, <I>et al.</I> Is frailty associated with long-term survival, neurological function and patient-reported outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest? A Swedish cohort study. <I>Resuscitation</I> 2022 Oct;<b>179</b>:233&ndash;242.</p></li><li><p>Zhang, <I>et al</I>. Impact of frailty on survival and neurological outcomes after cardiac arrest &ndash; a systematic review and meta-analysis. <I>Cardiology in Review</I> 2024.</p></li><li><p>Van Tuijn, St. Jansdal ziekenhuis. Behandelbeperkingen, medische richtlijn VMS (versie 7). 30-11-2022.</p></li><li><p>Smulders, <I>et al</I>. De reanimatievraag: wat moet, wat mag en wat is goede zorg? Interne Geneeskunde 2023&ndash;03; 20&ndash;22. Via Website NIV https://www.internisten.nl/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Interne-Geneeskunde-2023-03_</p></li><li><p>Bosch, <I>et al</I>. SEH geen plek voor reanimeerafspraken - Bespreek behandelbeleid op een rustiger moment. Medisch Contact. 14 juni 2017.</p></li><li><p>Becker, <I>et al</I>. Code status discussions in medical inpatients: results of a survey of patients and physicians. <I>Swiss Medical Weekly</I> 2020;<b>150</b>:w20194.</p></li><li><p>Laakkonen, <I>et al</I>. Older people&rsquo;s reasoning for resuscitation preferences and their role in the decision-making process. Nov 2004; <I>Resuscitation</I> 2005; <b>65</b>:165&ndash;171.</p></li><li><p>Schonwetter, <I>et al</I>. Resuscitation decision making in the elderly: the value of outcome data. <I>J Gen Intern Med</I>. 1993;<b>8</b>:295&ndash;300.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[NAM (Nathalie) Bakx]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.64</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.64</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[64 Discussion and documentation of treatment limitations in elderly (70+) at the internal medicine department]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A46</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A47</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A48?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[65 Empowering patients and nurses in acute pain management]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A48?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Acute pain is caused by acute events such as injury, surgery, illness or trauma. It generally lasts for a short duration and usually resolves with treatment of underlying causes.</p><p>When acute pain is not well managed, it limits patients&rsquo; function in performing activities such as deep breathing exercises and mobilization. These activities are essential in preventing various complications such as pneumonia and deconditioning. It can also lead to prolonged hospitalizations.<sup>1</sup>  </p><p>Besides background acute pain, patients frequently experience breakthrough acute pain that can happen abruptly or be triggered by activities. Breakthrough pain commonly results in functional limitation of patients, and it is defined as a transitory flare of pain to greater than moderate intensity. It can be managed well with breakthrough analgesia. However, poor application of breakthrough analgesia is commonly seen inpatient which leads to poorly controlled acute pain.</p><p>Our objective as such is to determine the causes of poor breakthrough analgesia application and improve its use within the inpatient setting, thereby improving acute pain management and facilitating functional improvement and recovery.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A cause-and-effect diagram (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>), mapped out from staff and patients&rsquo; feedback, enabled our team to identify potential causes that could help improve breakthrough pain management of acute pain patients.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 65 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Cause and Effect Diagram</p></caption><link locator="65_F1"></fig></p><p>Suboptimal nursing pain assessment and patients&rsquo; low awareness of breakthrough analgesia appeared to be the root causes.</p><p>As such, we adopted the Functional Activity Scale (FAS)<sup>2</sup> to standardize and increase objectivity of pain assessments for the nurses. The FAS is an objective observer rated measurement that assesses functional ability (e.g., deep breathing, sitting up in bed, transferring) in patients with acute pain using a &lsquo;score&rsquo; of A, B or C. (<cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">Table 1</cross-ref>)</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 65 Table 1</no><caption><p>Functional Activity Scale (FAS) with added Nursing Interventions recommended, adapted from Victorian Quality Council, Acute Pain Management Toolkit.</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="4"><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1">  <b>Functional Activity Scale (FAS</b>  <b>) Score</b> </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1">  <b>Nursing Interventions</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="4" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">A &ndash; no limitation </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Patient <unl>is able to </unl>undertake the activity <unl>without limitation </unl>due to pain. </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Pain score* intensity is typically 0&ndash;3 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">No action required. </c></r><r><c cspan="4" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">B &ndash; mild limitation </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Patient <unl>is able to </unl>undertake the activity but experiences <unl>moderate to severe </unl>pain. </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Pain score* intensity is typically 4 to 10 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Assess pain and administer breakthrough analgesia. </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">C &ndash; significant limitation </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Patient <unl>is unable to complete the activity </unl>due to pain. </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">To inform doctor if pain persists despite breakthrough analgesia. </c></r></tblbdy><tblfn><p>*Pain score refers to Verbal Analogue Scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever).</p></tblfn></tbl></p><p>The FAS scale was displayed on all medication carts, for easy reference and reminders to nurses during their medication rounds. The increased visibility of the reference charts also improved nursing awareness and understanding of acute pain management.</p><p>To empower patients in understanding and managing their acute breakthrough pain, we created pain poster guides in all common local languages (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>) and handed them to patients.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 65 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Pain poster guide in English, Mandarin and Malay</p></caption><link locator="65_F2"></fig></p><p>We aimed to optimize acute pain and breakthrough pain management by achieving a combined percentage of Functional Activity Scale (FAS) Score of A and B of 100% in acute pain patients within 4 General Surgery inpatient wards (Wards 18, 28, 19 and 29) over 6 months. We included patients who can communicate and had acute pain within 3 months. Exclusion criteria were patients with a history of chronic pain, drug aberrancy, psychiatric problems and patients who were unable to communicate.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The above interventions were piloted for 2 months in Wards 18 and 28 while Wards 19 and 29 were identified as the control wards.</p><p>A comparison on the percentage of A &amp; B FAS scores between the pilot and control wards demonstrated a significant improvement in the pilot wards with p &lt; 0.05 (0.000137). The positive results had encouraged the team to implement the FAS scale and guide to the control wards as well.</p><p>The percentage of A &amp; B in FAS of acute pain patients for control wards from Aug 2023 to Dec 2023 demonstrated improvement from the baseline of 54% to 100% after our interventions.</p><p>The satisfaction level of patient expressing &lsquo;Good&rsquo; and &lsquo;Very Good&rsquo; for their pain management increased from 30.1% to 37.5% with the intervention of FAS scale and poster guide. Patient ability to self-manage acute pain confidently has also increased from 14% to 96%.</p><p>In conclusion, with the implementation of FAS and Pain poster guide, we managed to optimize patients&rsquo; acute pain management to achieve 100% FAS A&amp;B scoring, increasing patients&rsquo; and nurses&rsquo; confidence in acute pain management. We have since extended this initiative beyond the General Surgery wards to the Geriatric Fracture Unit (GFU). We aim to extend this success with the empowerment of both nurses and patients to improve acute pain management throughout the hospital&rsquo;s wards and clinics.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Walton LL, Duff E, Arora RC, McMillan DE. Surgery patients' perspectives of their role in postoperative pain: a scoping review. <I>Int J Nurs Stud Adv.</I> 2023 Mar 30;<b>5</b>:100124. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100124. PMID: 38746556; PMCID: PMC11080476</p></li><li><p>Macintyre PE, Schug SA. (2015). Acute pain management: a practical guide. CRC Press, Taylor &amp; Francis Group.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jie Ling, J. F., Fei, W. Y., Mohamed Noor, N. B., Fei, H., Tamina, R. A., Yu Adeline, L. X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.65</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.65</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[65 Empowering patients and nurses in acute pain management]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A48</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A49</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A49?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[66 'Adequate registration, proportional pain management & optimized post-discharge opioid prescription]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A49?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Effective management of postoperative pain is crucial for faster recovery and the prevention of complications.<sup>1 2</sup> Since November 2020, a new postoperative pain protocol has been implemented at the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC). However, previous assessments in Surgical Wards 1 and 2 (SW1 &amp; SW2) indicated that the protocol was not consistently followed. Additionally, there was a lack of standardized guidelines regarding the prescription and tapering of opioids post-discharge.<sup>3 4</sup> This led to the initiation of an quality improvement project aimed at optimizing adherence to the postoperative pain protocol.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>The primary objective of the project was to enhance adherence to the postoperative pain protocol in SW1 &amp; SW2. The specific goals were:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Registration: Increase the percentage of recorded pain scores to 80%.</p></li><li><p>Pain Management: Improve the percentage of appropriate interventions for high pain scores to 50%.</p></li></l></p><p>As a secondary objective:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Opioids: Reduce the prescription of opioids upon discharge (maximum of 3 days&lsquo; supply) to 50%.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A clinical audit was conducted, and nurses were shadowed to gather data. Key stakeholders were identified, and a project group was formed to ensure support. The challenges were analyzed using a Fishbone diagram and the &lsquo;Five Whys&rsquo; method. The underlying causes identified included a lack of knowledge, inefficient registration methods using Computers On Wheels (COWs), and the layout of the patient records in the electronical medical system. A literature review was conducted to identify best practices for improvement strategies, which inspired the brainstorming of potential interventions.<sup>5&ndash;8</sup> The following interventions were selected using the CAST model and included:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Providing education to healthcare staff through e-learning and clinical lessons.</p></li><li><p>Sharing audit results to raise awareness.</p></li><li><p>Distributing a patient brochure on tapering pain medications post-discharge.</p></li><li><p>Increasing the availability of COWs.</p></li><li><p>Displaying pain scores more prominently in the electronical medical system.</p></li></l></p><p>Following the implementation of these improvements, a follow-up clinical audit was conducted at the end of March 2021.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The following outcomes were achieved:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>  <b>Registration:</b> The percentage of pain scores recorded three times daily improved from 54% to 69%.</p></li><li><p>  <b>Pain Management:</b> The percentage of appropriate actions taken for high pain scores increased from 24% to 63%.</p></li><li><p>  <b>Opioids:</b> The proportion of patients discharged with a limited opioid supply (maximum 3 days) declined from 40% to 14%.</p></li></l></p><p>Through a combination of clinical audits, education, and the involvement of a multidisciplinary team, it was possible to improve adherence to the postoperative pain protocol. While the percentage of recorded pain scores increased, it remained below the target. This may be attributed to the absence of a nursing role model on SW1. The percentage of appropriate responses to high pain scores also improved. However, no improvement was observed in limiting opioid prescriptions post-discharge, possibly due to the small sample size or the fact that ward physicians had not yet completed the e-learning module. The positive outcomes are likely attributable to the education provided to the healthcare staff.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Kehlet H, Holte K. Effect of postoperative analgesia on surgical outcome. <I>Br. J. Anaesth</I> 2001;<b>87</b>(1):62&ndash;72.</p></li><li><p>Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. <I>Anesth Analg</I> 2003;<b>97</b>:534&ndash;40.</p></li><li><p>Rawal N. Current issues in postoperative pain management. <I>Eur J Anaesthesiol</I> 2016;<b>33</b>:160&ndash;171.</p></li><li><p>Van Boekel RLM, Steegers MAH, De Blok C, Schilp J. Pain registration: for the benefit of the inspectorate or the patient? <I>Ned. Tijdschr. Geneeskd.</I> 2014;<b>158</b>:A7723.</p></li><li><p>Chanvej L, Petpichetchian W, Kovitwanawong N, Chaibandit C, Vorakul C, Khunthong T. A chart audit of postoperative pain assessment and documentation: the first step to implement pain assessment as the fifth vital sign in a university hospital in Thailand. <I>J Med Assoc Thai.</I> 2004;<b>87</b>(12):1447&ndash;1453.</p></li><li><p>van Boekel RL, Steegers MA, Verbeek-van Noord I, van der Sande R, Vissers KC. Acute pain services and postsurgical pain management in the Netherlands: a survey. <I>Pain Pract</I>. 2015;<b>15</b>(5):447&ndash;454.</p></li><li><p>De Rond M, de Wit R, van Dam F. The implementation of a pain monitoring programme for nurses in daily clinical practice: results of a follow-up study in five hospitals. <I>J. Adv. Nurs</I>. 2001;<b>35</b>(4):590&ndash;598.</p></li><li><p>Ravaud P, Keita H, Porcher R, Durand-Stocco C, Desmonts JM, Mantz J. Randomized clinical trial to assess the effect of an educational programme designed to improve nurses&rsquo; assessment and recording of postoperative pain. <I>Br J Surg.</I> 2004;<b>91</b>(6):692&ndash;8.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mangione, J., van der Linden, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.66</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.66</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[66 'Adequate registration, proportional pain management & optimized post-discharge opioid prescription]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A49</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A50</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A50?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[67 Preparing a future ready clinical workforce with cross-cutting capability, adaptive expertise and action learning]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A50?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Healthcare systems face increasing uncertainty and complexity due to rapidly ageing populations, evolving care models, and transitions in healthcare financing. The department of Family Medicine Development with National Healthcare Group Polyclinics in Singapore identified a need to prepare their clinical workforce for these future challenges through enhanced capabilities and adaptive expertise.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A mixed-methods approach was implemented between 2019&ndash;2023. Initial stakeholder engagement involved doctors, dentists, nurses, allied health professionals, pharmacists, and administrative directors to identify future healthcare needs and required skill sets. The Professional for Tomorrow&rsquo;s Healthcare (PTH)<sup>1</sup> framework was used to structure interventions. Key initiatives included training sessions on master adaptive learner,<sup>2</sup> establishment of Action Learning facilitators and sets, development of in-house experts in professionalism, clinical ethics, and evidence-based appraisal, and promoting digital readiness culture.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Surveys conducted in 2020 and 2022 using a validated tool aligned with the PTH model showed high levels of cross-cutting capability, digital and future readiness among medical, nursing and allied health professional groups. The impact was observed at multiple levels: Personal (enhanced problem-solving skills and digital readiness), Departmental (improved collaborative problem-solving), and Institutional (strengthened adaptive learning culture). Challenges included cultural resistance to action learning in Asian settings, resource allocation for training, COVID-19 disruptions to implementation timelines and implementation of a new electronic medical record system using EPIC system.</p><p>The introduction of these initiatives has resulted in improved staff capabilities in problem-solving, teamwork, medicolegal scenario management, and critical appraisal. The organizational culture has shifted towards greater digital readiness and change resilience, ultimately enhancing both staff engagement and patient care quality.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Chew N, Teo W, Lim WS, Ng Y, Tham KY. &lsquo;The professional for tomorrow&rsquo;s healthcare: a model for healthcare in the 21st century&rsquo;. Singapore: Institute for Adult Learning, 2015. 9th International Conference on Researching Work and Learning <b>3</b>:1134&ndash;1154</p></li><li><p>Cutrer W, Vanderbilt University, Pusic M, Harvard Medical School, Gruppen L, University of Michigan Medical School, Hammoud MM, University of Michigan Medical School, Santen SA, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine (2020). The Master Adaptive Learner. Philadelphia: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">Elsevier</inter-ref>.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wai, K. K., Kannan, P. P., Meng Huey, J. C., Chiang, W. T., Ching Siang, C. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.67</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.67</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[67 Preparing a future ready clinical workforce with cross-cutting capability, adaptive expertise and action learning]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A50</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A50</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A53?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[72 Integrating safety reporting and data insights to enhance patient care quality: the evolution of an automated IHI trigger system]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A53?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Emirates Health Services (EHS) is the largest public healthcare provider in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). EHS governs a large network of healthcare facilities ranging from primary to tertiary care. EHS follows a standardised approach for maintaining patient safety and regulate clinical practice through best practice guidelines.</p><p>When implementing patient safety guidelines, we faced significant challenges with a manual patient safety reporting process that hindered effective tracking, timely intervention, and thorough event analysis. In addition, the manual and fragmented system had a direct impact on patient care and safety by frequently missed or reported late events, delaying corrective actions.</p><p>To address these gaps, we initiated a multi-phase improvement project through our Oracle Health EMR. This project focused on automating IHI triggers, enhancing reporting systems, and introducing a data-driven approach to elevate patient safety and care quality across our facilities.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A mixed-method approach was used to introduce the automated reporting system based on IHI triggers which included: Reviewing historical data on reported events to identify patterns of underreporting, missed events, and delays in reporting. Also, interviews conducted for staff and focus groups with key stakeholders, including the patient safety team, hospital quality departments, and informatics teams, to gather first-hand insights on pain points and inefficiencies in the current system.</p><p>Analysing the limitations of voluntary reporting, manual tracking, and the lack of integration with the electronic medical records (EMR) system, which revealed substantial gaps in both event detection and compliance.</p></sec><sec><st>Interventions</st><p>To improve patient safety reporting, significant changes were implemented to move from a manual, voluntary process to an automated and integrated system. The key areas of focus included automation of IHI triggers in our EMR and structured data reporting (Examples: Automated System for IHI Triggers, Standardized Reporting and Analytics, Training and Continuous Improvement Cycles and Linking Event Triggers to Action Plans) which collectively aimed to enhance the accuracy, efficiency, and transparency of safety event tracking.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The effect was measured by assessing improvements in reporting accuracy, process efficiency, and compliance with safety protocols across the three PDSA cycles. This involved both quantitative and qualitative metrics to gauge the impact of each intervention. After <b>9</b> training session for end user with more than <b>760</b> attendees, we affectively started to capture 9 IHI triggers including: <b>Prolonged time in the Emergency department, Electrolyte disturbances, Re-admission to the emergency department, Vitamin K order, Clostridium difficile, Fall, Pressure ulcer and blood loss</b>. The average number of possible adverse events captured was <b>4100</b> per month during 2024. Preliminary results show a <b>20</b>  <b>%</b> increase in action plan adherence, which is anticipated to improve further as users become more accustomed to the streamlined reporting process. Also, automation of IHI triggers reporting eliminated the need to recruit clinical auditor per hospital which helped EHS to save <b>7920504 AED</b> per year.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alshamsi, A. I., Alktebi, Y., AlAttal, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.72</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.72</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[72 Integrating safety reporting and data insights to enhance patient care quality: the evolution of an automated IHI trigger system]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A53</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A54</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A56?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[77 'Improving shared decision-making for older patients with cancer: implementing integrated contextual information from primary and secondary care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A56?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>ISSUE (Conflicts of Interest and Ethics Approval)</st><p>No conflicts of interest. This project is funded by Zorginstituut Nederland. The study was reviewed by the Medical Ethics Committee (METC) and was not deemed subject to the WMO.</p></sec><sec><st>CONTEXT (Background and Setting)</st><p>The project was conducted in three hospitals across four departments in Northern Netherlands. The multidisciplinary team consisted of medical specialists from surgery and geriatric medicine, a general practitioner, nurses, and researchers. The involved implementation groups were:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Surgery, Orthopedics (Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors), ENT (Head and Neck Tumors), Dermatology</p></li><li><p>Martini Hospital (Breast Cancer Tumors)</p></li><li><p>Wilhelmina Hospital Assen (Colorectal Tumors)</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>PROBLEM (Rationale and Aims)</st><p>Approximately 40,000 patients aged 70 and older are diagnosed with cancer annually, a number that is increasing. As treatment options expand, balancing medical possibilities with patients&lsquo; wishes becomes crucial. Information about patient frailty, goals, social network, and coping mechanisms is often fragmented across healthcare providers, such as general practitioners (GPs) or hospital staff. This information is critical for shared decision-making, but is not always integrated into treatment discussions. Research shows patients are often unaware of different treatment options or their pros and cons, and would like to discuss these with their GP. However, GPs often lack the necessary information to guide these conversations in a timely manner.</p></sec><sec><st>ASSESSMENT OF PROBLEM (Causes and Analysis)</st><p>This project builds on previous research concerning the exchange of patient information between hospitals and GPs. We involved diverse healthcare professionals from oncological care pathways, who joined based on interest and motivation. After approval, initial meetings were held at each site to align and define project goals.</p></sec><sec><st>INTERVENTION (Change and Implementation)</st><p>The project aimed to enhance the integration of contextual patient information into treatment decisions, especially by utilizing GP data. Key interventions included:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Nurses collecting health and patient preference information and presenting this during multidisciplinary meetings (MDT).</p></li><li><p>GP-provided patient context and vulnerability data were shared in the MDT.</p></li><li><p>Nurses and a geriatric specialist or internist participated in the MDT to ensure the inclusion of this information.</p></li><li><p>MDT decisions were shared with all involved, including the GP.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>STRATEGY FOR CHANGE</st><p>Each implementation group tailored the intervention to their local needs. The project lasted two years: the first year focused on identifying necessary changes, and the second on implementation. Clinicians and nurses acted as ambassadors for the project, providing feedback during evaluation meetings. Patients were consulted using focus groups on specific subjects.</p></sec><sec><st>MEASUREMENT OF IMPROVEMENT</st><p>We conducted both qualitative and quantitative evaluations. Observations of MDT discussions showed an increase in patient context discussion from 63% to 76%, with the biggest increases in psychological (32% to 51%) and social domains (32% to 48%). The frequency of multiple treatment options being discussed also increased (50% to 60%) with more deliberations on context information of the patient.</p><p>Healthcare providers reported increased satisfaction with the decision-making process, highlighting the value of including patient context in multidisciplinary meetings. Nurses felt more empowered to contribute to patient care decisions, with their participation increasing from 24% to 51%. Medical specialists also indicated a better understanding of patient preferences and a more holistic approach to treatment planning.</p><p>The final evaluation will be completed by the end of 2025.</p></sec><sec><st>PATIENT INVOLVEMENT</st><p>Patients were actively involved throughout the project. Focus groups were held at two key points to gather feedback on their experience with shared decision-making and treatment information. In addition, a patient advocate from a cancer patient association contributed from the start, ensuring the patient perspective was represented in the project design and implementation.</p></sec><sec><st>EFFECTS OF CHANGES (Impact)</st><p>The integration of context information improved patient satisfaction, with 72.3% of patients experiencing shared decision-making. More treatment options were discussed, and healthcare professionals were generally satisfied with the changes. Various departments within and outside oncology have shown interest in adopting similar approaches.</p></sec><sec><st>LESSONS LEARNED</st><p>Every setting requires customization; change takes time and needs continuous reinforcement. Securing funding for smaller initiatives can be challenging, so it is essential to work with available resources. Appointing a process owner and addressing barriers to structural integration early on are crucial for long-term success.</p></sec><sec><st>MAIN MESSAGE</st><p>Integrating patient context into decision-making improves outcomes. Start small, but start nonetheless!</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hanewinkel, V. C., Stegmann, M. E., Wal, H. v. d., Brandenbarg, D., ZIN projectteam]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.77</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.77</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[77 'Improving shared decision-making for older patients with cancer: implementing integrated contextual information from primary and secondary care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A56</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A57</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A57?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[78 Time to move: sit out of bed (S.O.O.B)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A57?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>This is a Quality Improvement Project aims to increase the frequency of patients requiring moderate assistance to sit out of bed more than 1 time daily from 41%to 80% in 4 general wards of Singapore General Hospital within 6 months.</p><p>Early mobilization plays a pivotal role in returning patients to their baseline function earlier (Healthhub, 2024 &amp; Lazare, 2024). Patients who have been assessed by the therapists and require moderate assistance (need for 2 persons) to help patients with transfer or to perform 50 -75% of functional activities with/without equipment) are observed to be not sitting out of bed as frequently (&le;1 time/day).</p><p>Staff shared barriers: confidence, manpower, and skill gaps.</p><p>Impact: increased hospital length of stay and cost, hospital acquired infection and reduced staff morale (Rindsland, 2021).</p><p>Current practice: Doctors refer patients to SOOB in the electronic referral system; nurses assist during mealtmes without specific schedule</p></sec><sec><st>Methodology</st><p>Root cause analysis using cause-effect diagram and Pareto chart as followed:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Insufficient emphasis on transfer importance</p></li><li><p>Lack of standardized staff training</p></li><li><p>Poor inter-staff communication on timing</p></li><li><p>No standardized SOOB workflow</p></li></l></p><p>Adopting Esther&rsquo;s philosophy (Singhealth ESTHER network, 2023), patients were interviewed about SOOB preferences and surveyed nurses across four wards to identify barriers, employing a patient-centric, bottom-up approach. Improvements require patient education on SOOB benefits, streamlined transfer workflow, structured timing, and standardized staff training for patient transfers.</p><p>Brainstorming, observation, and SCAMPER were utilized to address root causes, prioritizing solutions via a matrix.</p></sec><sec><st>Interventions</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Standardize staff training in transfer techniques.</p></li><li><p>Introducing ward Champions to train the nursing</p></li><li><p>Introduce transfer Team (Occupational Therapist, Physiotherapist and Nursing team) to communicate on transfer timing daily</p></li></l></p><p>Solutions were validated with stakeholders and processes verified. Key initiatives include:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Standardized cross-disciplinary training with competency checklists, adapting physiotherapy materials for nursing use, and identifying ward champions as trainers</p></li><li><p>Implementing a standardized SOOB workflow with set transfer times (8:30&ndash;9:30 am &amp; 11:45 am&ndash;1 pm) to ensure consistency among staff</p></li><li><p>Created educational videos on bed-to-chair transfer techniques and their importance for patients needing moderate assistance, targeting families and caregivers</p></li></l></p><p>Three PDSA cycles were implemented:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Standardizing staff competency with a checklist developed collaboratively with PT/OT, training ward champions to ensure consistent transfer skills.</p></li><li><p>Establishing a standardized workflow with &lsquo;SOOB&rsquo; signage and set transfer times (8:30&ndash;9:30 am and 11:45 am&ndash;1 pm) for the transfer team (PT, OT, nurses).</p></li><li><p>Creating educational videos on bed-to-chair transfer techniques to empower patients/caregivers, followed by evaluation of their confidence in transfers</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Result</st><p>  <b>Tangible results</b>  </p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>The percentage of patients (N=35) requiring moderate assistance in sitting out of bed increased from median of 41% to 80% within 6 months.</p></li><li><p>No pressure sores or infections reported</p></li></l></p><p>  <b>Post-intervention outcomes</b>  </p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>33% of the patients improved in their functional mobility.</p></li><li><p>89% of the patients did not sustain any hospital acquired infection.</p></li><li><p>91% of patients did not readmit to hospital within a month.</p></li><li><p>Staff were surveyed after implementation of solutions.</p></li></l></p><p>Primary measurement: </p><p>Percentage of patients sitting out of bed &gt;1 time/day</p><p>Secondary measurements: </p><p>Patient/staff satisfaction, complications, and readmission rates</p><p>  <b>Intangible results</b> (N=100 staff):</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>96% found the Transfer Team helpful</p></li><li><p>Time savings and reduced injury risk reported</p></li><li><p>Increased patient confidence</p></li><li><p>Estimated $6,190.80 annual manpower savings from transfer team implementation</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Replicable initiatives for similar patient populations included Nursing Champions train new staff on workflow, Transfer team ensures daily SOOB, Expanding to other SGH wards, Train-the-trainer model maintains transfer technique standards and Chat groups and system documentation enhance therapist-nurse communication.</p><p>Multidisciplinary collaboration, though challenging, is crucial for optimal patient care. Our team leaders, representing various disciplines, share a common goal and vision, influencing staff to adopt and sustain improvements.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Healthhub. (2024). Discover the Benefits of Getting Out of Bed while in hospital. https://www.healthhub.sg/live-healthy/why-bed-rest-often-isnt-best</p></li><li><p>Healthhub. (2024). Complications of Prolonged Bed Rest. https://www.healthhub.sg/live-healthy/why-bed-rest-often-isnt-best</p></li><li><p>Lazare, J. (2024). Promotion Mobility in Hospitalized Elderly Patients. https://www.todaysgeriatricmedicine.com/news/ex_010617.shtml</p></li><li><p>Rindsland, S. (2021). Early Mobilisation 1: risk factors, complications and costs of immobility. https://cdn.ps.emap.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2021/03/210317-Early-mobilisation-1-risk-factors-complications-and-costs-of-immobility.pdf</p></li><li><p>Singhealth ESTHER network. (2023). Esther Caf&eacute; and Coaches. http://www.singhealth.com.sg/rhs/esther-network/esther-cafe-and-coaches</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Long, D., Wong, L., Lee, C., Tan, Y., Binte Mohd Mokhtar, N. F., Chng, P., D/O Amanulla, M., Chen, J., Castillo, B., QMR, N., KCM, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.78</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.78</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[78 Time to move: sit out of bed (S.O.O.B)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A57</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A58</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A61?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[83 Current status and intervention solutions to improve the quality of life for patient with post COVID-19 syndrome in Thai Binh, Viet Nam]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A61?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Vietnam is a developing country with a healthcare system that is still in the process of improvements; but it faces many challenges. Notably, the healthcare infrastructure remains outdated, and financial resources for healthcare are limited, directly affecting the population&rsquo;s access to quality medical services. Thai Binh is an agricultural province with difficult economic conditions, a large population (over 2 million people), and numerous industrial zones. Consequently, the community experienced a high number of COVID-19 infections during 2021&ndash;2022 (with over 70,000 cases by April 2022). There is a substantial demand for post-COVID-19 healthcare among residents in the province. Currently, due to the lack of practical data on the health status and quality of life of patients after COVID-19, healthcare facilities do not have sufficient evidence to select the appropriate human resources and infrastructure to meet the urgent healthcare needs of the population today.</p><p>&lsquo; Post-COVID-19 Syndrome&rsquo; is a condition in which symptoms or after-effects persist after a patient has recovered from COVID-19, presenting with diverse clinical manifestations of over 200 symptoms.<sup>1</sup> Based on previously published global statistics, about 40&ndash;50% of recovered patients have symptoms of Post-COVID-19 Syndrome.<sup>2&ndash;3</sup> In Vietnam, these studies are still very limited, despite the syndrome&rsquo;s significant effects on patient&rsquo;s quality of life. In Thai Binh, no study has provided data on the prevalence of Post-COVID-19 in the community, the distribution rate of common symptoms, paraclinical abnormalities, or correlation with clinical manifestations, as well as no community intervention solutions have been proposed.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>A survey of over 2,000 individuals with prior COVID-19 infection revealed a Post-COVID-19 prevalence rate of 60.9%, with the highest prevalence in the mental disorder group (50.8%) and the lowest in the digestive disorder group (7.9%). The related factors included pre-existing conditions and hospitalization during COVID-19 infection. After collecting sufficient data, we implemented interventions for 500 Post-COVID-19 patients in Thai Binh City and Vu Thu District (due to the lack of economic conditions and time constraints). The intervention activities included: Free examinations and tests for Post-COVID-19 patients at medical facilities throughout the province. Identifying priority health problems in patient groups with mental, neurological, cardiovascular, digestive, respiratory, endocrine, and immune symptoms to provide targeted interventions. The main interventions focused on symptom management, psychological support, and rehabilitation for patients.</p><p>Providing recommendations for the healthcare system in caring for Post-COVID-19 patients, categorized by specific groups: Patients treated for COVID-19 at home; patients treated for COVID-19 in hospitals; and patients who received ICU care for COVID-19. Strengthening the role of primary healthcare system in initial patient care. Establishing a primary healthcare network, comprising medical experts from various specialties. Implementing a post-discharge care plan for Post-COVID-19 patients requiring hospitalization. Expanding multidisciplinary rehabilitation services. Developing a system for managing and storing information on Post-COVID-19 patients.</p><p>Participants managed in the project will undergo interviews, clinical examinations, and repeat testing to assess symptoms and quality of life scores after interventions: Anxiety, depression, and stress symptoms will be evaluated using the DASS-21 questionnaire; quality of life will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire; clinical examination and laboratory tests will include: Complete blood count, respiratory function tests, glucose, urea, creatinine, GOT, GPT, ECG, and chest X-ray. Statistical tests will be used to describe variables (post-intervention symptoms, symptom duration, clinical physical damage, laboratory results) and to measure relationships between variables at a 95% statistical significance level.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Expected outcomes after 5 years of intervention:</p><p>In terms of symptoms: Symptom detection in common Post-COVID-19 groups, such as those with mental, neurological, cardiovascular, digestive, respiratory, endocrine, and immune disorders, will be conducted at the primary healthcare level, ensuring timely monitoring, care, and treatment; reducing the proportion of individuals with worsened health status compared to before contracting COVID-19, from 43% to below 20% post-intervention; reduce the percentage of individuals showing symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress, from 6% to 0% after intervention; reduce the percentage of individuals exhibiting signs of anemia, from 20% to 0% after intervention.</p><p>Quality of life: Reduce the percentage of individuals with below-average quality of life, from 40% to 0% after intervention.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Early detection of individuals at risk for Post-COVID-19 in the community will facilitate the efficient allocation and balancing of healthcare resources, including human resources, infrastructure, and funding. Providing data on the current prevalence of Post-COVID-19 in the community and suggests effective intervention solutions, helping policymakers and healthcare organizations have a basis to conduct projects aimed at improving the quality of life for local populations in the future.</p><p>Current project challenges include the lack of standardized diagnostic criteria for Post-COVID-19 Syndrome, both in Vietnam and globally. Current intervention methods remain limited, uncertain, and inconsistent, with a primary focus on symptom management, psychological support, and rehabilitation.<sup>4</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Montani D, Savale L, Noel N, <I>et al</I>. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. <I>Eur Respir Rev</I>. 2022;<b>31</b>(163):210185. doi:10.1183/16000617.0185-2021</p></li><li><p>Peghin M, Palese A, Venturini M, <I>et al</I>. Post-COVID-19 symptoms 6 months after acute infection among hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients. <I>Clin Microbiol Infect</I>. 2021;<b>27</b>(10):1507&ndash;1513. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2021.05.033</p></li><li><p>Kisiel MA, Janols H, Nordqvist T, <I>et al</I>. Predictors of post-COVID-19 and the impact of persistent symptoms in non-hospitalized patients 12 months after COVID-19, with a focus on work ability. <I>Ups J Med Sci</I>. 2022;<b>127</b>. doi:10.48101/ujms.v127.8794</p></li><li><p>Tsampasian V, Elghazaly H, Chattopadhyay R, <I>et al</I>. Risk factors associated with post&ndash;COVID-19 condition: a systematic review and meta-analysis. <I>JAMA Internal Medicine</I> 2023;<b>183</b>(6):566&ndash;580. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.0750</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chinh Nguyen, T. M., Lai, D. T., Trung Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, D. T., Nguyen, V. T., Vu, V. T., The Dung Pham]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.83</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.83</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[83 Current status and intervention solutions to improve the quality of life for patient with post COVID-19 syndrome in Thai Binh, Viet Nam]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A61</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A62</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A62?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[84 Personalized nutritional strategies for better life quality in gastric cancer patients]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A62?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Thai Binh Provincial General Hospital, Vietnam, a Level I hospital under Vietnam&rsquo;s four-level hospital classification, was established in 1903. We average 800 to 1200 outpatient visits and 1200 to 1500 inpatient admissions daily. Additionally, we serve as the main training facility for Thai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy and Thai Binh Medical College. Annually, the hospital admits, receives, and treats an average of 9,000 cancer patients at the Oncology Center using various treatment methods. Gastrointestinal cancers are the most common type, accounting for 47.5% of cases. Among these, stomach cancer ranks third among gastrointestinal cancers (representing 8.01%) and has shown a gradual increase in incidence over the years.</p><p>Gastric cancer ranks as the 5th leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with high mortality rates in developing countries, including Vietnam. According to GLOBOCAN 2022 data, Vietnam reported 16,277 new gastric cancer cases, ranking 6th in Asia and 5th in mortality rates, with an increasingly younger patient demographic.<sup>1&ndash;3</sup> Basic treatments include surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and palliative care. However, disease-related nutritional deficits and digestive side effects from treatments exacerbate malnutrition.<sup>4</sup> Nutritional intervention in treatment is gaining importance in developing countries, including Vietnam and at Thai Binh Provincial General Hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>Our initial assessment of 80 gastric cancer patients undergoing standard gastrectomy showed a 34% malnutrition rate based on BMI, with 6.3% classified as severe. The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) classified 20% of patients as PG-SGA C and 56% as PG-SGA B, with variations observed by gender and disease stage. Symptoms included fatigue and pain (100% of patients), loss of appetite (60%), and taste changes (43.8%), leading to 96.3% experiencing weight loss within six months pre-admission. Hemoglobin-based anemia affected 45% of patients (44% of men, 46.7% of women). These issues significantly impacted patient quality of life, with 100% of patients reporting below-average overall health scores.</p><p>We implemented personalized nutritional interventions for surgical gastric cancer patients during their hospital stay and at home. The program includes: Individualized nutritional counseling at each treatment stage; Developing sample menus and providing specific diets for each patient; Supplying high-energy, nutrient-rich nutritional products; Offering personalized psychological support; Providing pre- and postoperative exercise guidance; Encouraging patient and family involvement in the treatment process</p><p>We developed a specific 3-month nutritional care plan starting from patient admission:</p><p>Step 1: Assess nutritional status, quality of life scores, and conduct tests for surgical candidates.</p><p>Step 2: Implement nutritional interventions throughout the treatment stages (postoperative, chemotherapy cycle 1, chemotherapy cycle 2, chemotherapy cycle 3): Nutritional counseling; home meal prep guidance; Customized menus; Provide high-energy, nutrient-rich products (according to ESPEN recommendations); Psychological support; Provide exercise guidance and encourage movement and position changes for patients 24 hours post-surgery; Conduct regular follow-ups to monitor patient progress and adjust plans as needed</p><p>Step 3: Continuously monitor and adjust interventions as necessary based on patient progress and feedback.</p><p>Step 4: Reassess nutritional status and quality of life post-intervention to evaluate effectiveness and make further recommendations if required</p><p>Evaluating, analyzing, and comparing the following metrics before intervention and at 3 months post-intervention. Nutritional status: Assessed by anthropometric measurements, clinical laboratory indices, and PG-SGA classification. Quality of life: Measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) tool. Clinical symptoms: Common symptoms such as fatigue and pain, loss of appetite, and taste changes.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>After 3 months of intervention:</p></sec><sec><st>Nutritional status</st><p>70% of patients showed improvement, returning to pre-surgery weight. Symptoms such as fatigue, pain, and taste changes significantly decreased (p&lt;0.05). Malnutrition rate (BMI) dropped from 28.0% to 14.0% (50% efficiency, p&lt;0.05). PG-SGA B/C rates decreased from 76.0% to 42.0% (44.7% efficiency, p&lt;0.05).</p><p>Quality of life: Functional quality of life scores increased, notably in comprehensive health (from 56.8 &plusmn; 8.7 to 69 &plusmn; 12.3), activity (from 71.7 &plusmn; 13.1 to 80 &plusmn; 14.3), and emotions (from 74.2 &plusmn; 7.2 to 79.5 &plusmn; 7.8). Symptom quality of life scores decreased, notably pain (from 34 &plusmn; 10.6 to 8.3 &plusmn; 14), taste loss (from 36.7 &plusmn; 26.3 to 12 &plusmn; 21), and fatigue (from 32.2 &plusmn; 10.1 to 19.8 &plusmn; 7.5).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Early nutritional intervention from the start of treatment equips patients with knowledge and good nutritional practices, preventing malnutrition and improving nutritional status and quality of life throughout cancer treatment. This is critical evidence demonstrating the role of nutritional therapies in clinical practice.</p><p>Effective implementation requires early screening and nutritional status assessment, along with close collaboration between clinicians and nutritionists in patient care and treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, <I>et al</I>. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. <I>CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians</I> 2023;<b>71</b>(3):209&ndash;249.</p></li><li><p>Jann A, Patrick B. ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. <I>Clinical Nutrition</I> 2016;<b>1</b>(38).</p></li><li><p>Lin Y, Zheng Y, Wang H, <I>et al</I>. Global patterns and trends in gastric cancer incidence rates (1988&ndash;2012) and predictions to 2030. <I>Gastroenterology</I> 2021;<b>161</b>(1):116&ndash;127.e8.</p></li><li><p>Yusefi AR, Lankarani KB. Risk factors for gastric cancer - a systematic review. <I>Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention</I> 2018;<b>19</b>(5):591&ndash;602.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chinh Nguyen, T. M., Anh Luong, T. M., Vu, C. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.84</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.84</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[84 Personalized nutritional strategies for better life quality in gastric cancer patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A62</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A63</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A65?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[89 Improving patient access to radiology information for imaging procedures information]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A65?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction/Context Setting</st><p>Radiology employs a range of imaging procedures to Diagnose, Assess &amp; Treat patients within the Trust. Regionally, an estimated1.8 Million Imaging investigations are undertaken annually. All patients groups need access to clear, easy to read, accessible information available in a format appropriate to meet their needs to allow them to make an informed decision about their care. This can be challenging for some patients who may require additional support. Across Northern Ireland (NI) there are an estimated:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>1 in 5 Adults are Deaf (RNID, 2022).</p></li><li><p>2.1% identify as LGBTQIA+ (census, 2021)</p></li><li><p>57,500 people have sigh loss (RNIB, 2023)</p></li><li><p>22,000 people live with Dementia (Alzheimers Society,2023)</p></li><li><p>For 4.6%, English is not their primary language (NISRA,2021)</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Assessing the Extent of the Issue</st><p>Radiology used the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) and College of Radiographers (CoR) Quality Standard Imaging (QSI) Standard to benchmark its current range of patient information against this national best practice guidance. The results suggested, Radiology did not have a sufficient range of patient information available for all imaging procedures. The current information was not accessible for all patients groups as it contained complex medical jargon &amp; it was not standardised or available in other formats or languages.</p></sec><sec><st>Strategy for Change</st><p>Radiology set up a staff led Special Interest Group (SIG) with the goal of supporting all patient groups including patients who may have additional needs and or requirements. The SIG group consisted of Radiology staff at all levels (Radiographers, Radiologists, Admin &amp; Clerical staff etc.), working in partnership with other professionals, patients and patient representatives groups in order to review and co-design Radiology patient information through:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Benchmarking against the Quality Standard for Imaging standards</p></li><li><p>Co-designing through listening and learning from:</p><p><l type="circle"><li><p>Experts e.g. Trust Dementia Lead, Trust Sensory Support Lead &amp; Trust Equality Lead</p></li><li><p>Service Users and their representatives groups e.g. focus groups to review patient information, learning from patient feedback.</p></li></l></p></li><li><p>Working together as a team e.g. Empowering our staff to identify challenges, Brainstorm Solutions and Led on QI projects</p></li><li><p>Embedding improvements through developing accessible information and communication aids for all imaging procedures such as:</p><p><l type="circle"><li><p>Standardising Patient information e.g. website/Leaflets/appointment letters- Review, generate, information to ensure all patients have equitable access to</p></li><li><p>information about the Service/Procedures that is: inclusive, standardised &amp; available in appropriate formats &amp; languages</p></li><li><p>Making information available in other formats e.g. Series of &lsquo;What to Expect&rsquo; subtitled videos, Information translated into top 10 languages, large font etc.</p></li></l></p></li><li><p>Providing staff training and support e.g. Deaf awareness and British Sign Language training, Dementia Awareness training etc.</p></li><li><p>Obtaining feedback e.g. through leaflet reviews, patient surveys and walking the patient&rsquo;s journey through &lsquo;live&rsquo; patient &lsquo;walkthrough assessments&rsquo; of imaging services etc.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Impact of Change</st><p>There were a number of key benefits noted from co-designing and working in partnership with service users including:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Patient information available for all imaging procedures (From 0% to 100% of areas)</p></li><li><p>Assurance in consistency and quality of the information available to patients (From 0% to 100% of Standardised letters &amp; leaflets)</p></li><li><p>More accessible information available to help support the needs of all patient groups e.g. Plain English information with inclusive terminology, available in different languages/formats promoted inclusivity, equitable access &amp; supported ALL patients to make an informed care decisions.</p></li><li><p>Co-designing with Patients ensured changes supported their actual needs (not just their perceived needs).</p></li><li><p>Anticipated, optimisation of imaging &amp; reduction in waiting times as patients are more likely to attend (&amp; be prepared) for their appointment when given ALL the information required.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Messages for Others</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Co-design &amp; involve all patients groups when developing/reviewing information to ensure it meets their actual (not perceived) needs.</p></li><li><p>Communicate clearly, involve early &amp; keep updated.</p></li><li><p>Consider the needs of all patient groups- Less text, more visuals information works best for ALL Patient groups</p></li><li><p>Team-working- Connect with &lsquo;experts&rsquo; for guidance &amp; support</p></li><li><p>Work with Patient involvement Groups, like the Public Health Agency, to create involvements library resources, helping others to embed the learning</p></li><li><p>Promote Regional working, to standardisation information across Trusts</p></li><li><p>Celebrate the win- recognise &amp; reward the positive changes</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cadden, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.89</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.89</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[89 Improving patient access to radiology information for imaging procedures information]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A65</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A66</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A66?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[90 Learning from an improvement collaborative focused on waiting less and waiting well in a mental health trust]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A66?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>This Quality Improvement (QI) collaborative programme took place within a mental health hospital Trust based in Sheffield in the North of England called Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust (SHSC). SHSC provides a range of mental health and learning disability services to the people of Sheffield. Some specialist services provide support for people from across the region, and the SHSC Gender Identity Clinic receives referrals from across the country.</p><p>In April 2024, there were approximately 1 million people waiting for mental health services in the UK, with 345,000 referrals incurring a wait of over a year for first contact with a mental health service.<sup>1</sup> The impact of long waiting times can be detrimental to patients, with research showing up to 39% of patients wating for mental health treatment report a decline in their mental health while waiting.<sup>2</sup> Anecdotal feedback from staff and service users indicated that prolonged waiting times for mental health services have become increasingly normalised, highlighting the urgent need for systemic improvements. Therefore, a multidisciplinary group of staff identified the importance of providing ongoing support for mental health services to enhance efficiency, maintain high-quality care, and implement strategies that ensure individuals on waiting lists receive appropriate support while they await treatment.</p><p>The need for support with better management of waitlists has long been highlighted as a priority by staff and service users at SHSC. Various sources highlighted this; for example, almost a third of the top ten complaints received by the organisation between November 2020 &ndash; October 2022 were related to &lsquo;access to services,&rsquo; which were often associated with waiting lists. Furthermore, staff feedback at various improvement events highlighted that reducing waiting lists and supporting service users to wait well was an absolute priority.</p><p>To address this, SHSC initiated its first ever two-year QI collaborative programme in July 2023 which focussed on &lsquo;Waiting Less and Waiting Well&rsquo;. Much of this programme has been based on the work of East London NHS Foundation Trust (ELFT).<sup>3</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The collaborative programme included nine teams within the Rehabilitation and Specialist Directorate of the organisation. These teams had long waiting lists, yet limited resources and staffing.</p><p>The programme was based on learning from the ELFT programme. As SHSC did not have the same capability and organisational readiness as other organisations, such as ELFT, the programme was adapted to include more time and resource to enable teams to achieve their improvement aims. Therefore, the IHI Breakthrough Series model<sup>4</sup> was adapted to consist of six Learning Sessions across two years, with Action Periods between each Learning Session. Each of the collaborative programme teams were assigned a QI coach to work with during the Action Periods to plan and complete tests of change. Teams followed the ELFT Approach to Optimising Flow<sup>3</sup> model by firstly working on a whole-system process map, then adding data and understanding capacity and demand. Using this information, they were able to identify areas for improvement, build a theory of change, and introduce tests of change using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>All teams measured the number of clients on their waiting lists at the various points in the pathway, with some teams achieving a significant reduction. For example, the Older Adult Community Mental Health Team (OA CMHT) delivered a 67% reduction in the number of people waiting for assessments by establishing protected nurse time to review the waiting lists. Another example was the Specialist Psychotherapy Service (SPS), who reviewed the attendance and frequency of various meetings to release over 40 clinical hours per month, developed therapy agreements to help standardise the number of therapy sessions service users received, and improved the quality of their data. These combined efforts resulted in a 40% reduction in the number of clients waiting for assessment and a 20% reduction in the waiting time for both assessment and treatment.</p><p>Each team also created individualised measurement plans related to their change ideas. One of the most successful projects was led by the Neurological Enablement Service (NES), who refined their triage process and measured the impact by recording the number of days between receiving the referral and being contacted by a clinician for sequential patients. The median number of days decreased from an average of 50 days to an average of 7 days over the course of the project, which has been sustained.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Some teams taking part in this QI collaborative programme experienced significant improvements in reducing the number of service users waiting and the time spent waiting for services at SHSC. It was noted that the teams that saw these results, such as OA CMHT, SPS and NES, were the teams that engaged in QI coaching more frequently and consistently than other teams. Each of these teams agreed to meet with their QI coach fortnightly, and the meetings included senior leaders that were able to implement and drive the changes. In future collaborative programmes, we will aim to ensure teams are contracted to consistent coaching sessions and contain colleagues who are able to drive the changes.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Darzi A. (2024) <I>Summary letter from Lord Darzi to the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care</I>, <I>GOV.UK</I>. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/independent-investigation-of-the-nhs-in-england/summary-letter-from-lord-darzi-to-the-secretary-of-state-for-health-and-social-care (Accessed: 11 November 2024).</p></li><li><p>2.<I> Two-fifths of patients waiting for mental health treatment forced to resort to emergency or crisis services</I> (2020) <I>www.rcpsych.ac.uk</I>. Available at: https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/news-and-features/latest-news/detail/2020/10/06/two-fifths-of-patients-waiting-for-mental-health-treatment-forced-to-resort-to-emergency-or-crisis-services (Accessed: 11 November 2024).</p></li><li><p>Shah A, <I>et al.</I> Improving access to services through a collaborative learning system at East London NHS Foundation Trust. <I>BMJ Open Quality</I> 2018;<b>7</b>(3). doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000337.</p></li><li><p>Institute for Healthcare Improvement (2003) <I>The Breakthrough Series: IHI&rsquo;s Collaborative Model for Achieving Breakthrough Improvement,</I> www.ihi.org. Available at: https://www.ihi.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/IHIBreakthroughSerieswhitepaper2003.pdf (Accessed: 18 March 2025)</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morton, J., Rostami, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.90</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.90</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[90 Learning from an improvement collaborative focused on waiting less and waiting well in a mental health trust]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A66</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A67</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A69?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[95 An evaluation of the impact of national recommendations on patient safety in perioperative care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A69?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Patient safety within perioperative care is significant due to the potential for major complications requiring a rapid response. The Royal College of Anaesthetists&rsquo; National Audit Projects (NAPs) have sought to improve patient safety by investigating serious and rare complications occurring during anaesthesia. The sixth NAP (NAP6), focused on perioperative anaphylaxis, and produced 134 recommendations. Staff perceptions of the impact of NAP6 recommendations have not been studied, which was the purpose of this research.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 21 healthcare professionals across three teaching hospitals in England and with five stakeholders who could share a national perspective. A documentary analysis was conducted with departmental and institutional documents associated with the training for, and management of perioperative anaphylaxis.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Examples of perceived impact included: raised awareness on the main culprits of perioperative anaphylaxis, and awareness to consider an event as anaphylaxis; changes in referrals of patients to allergy clinics; increased penicillin de-labelling initiatives; better communication with healthcare professionals and patients; alerts to remind staff on recommended care; and updates to national guidelines. Limited access to allergy clinics; the need for further penicillin de-labelling; the lack of accountability for implementing recommendations; misalignment between disciplines; difficulties removing incorrect allergy labels; and limited dissemination were highlighted as areas for improvement in implementation. Whilst access to allergy clinics; good relationships with stakeholders in the field; hospitals engaged with quality improvement initiatives; and the perioperative allergy network were recognised as enablers to implementation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Future areas for consideration based on the perspectives shared by interviewees include improving access to allergy testing, enhancing penicillin de-labelling initiatives, and sharing guidance on how to implement the recommendations (including funding).</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beecham, E., Clark, S. E., Brady, G., Brummell, Z., Kane, A. D., Littlejohns, A., Moppett, I., Moonesinghe, S. R., Cook, T., Vindrola-Padros, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.95</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.95</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[95 An evaluation of the impact of national recommendations on patient safety in perioperative care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A69</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A70</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A75?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[104 To achieve 95% of inpatient definite care (IDC) within 24 hours among general medicine patients who are waiting for inpatient beds for more than 10 hours in Tan Tock Seng hospital (Singapore) emergency department]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A75?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The Department of General Medicine (GM) at Tan Tock Seng Hospital (TTSH) Singapore is responsible for managing high number of patients that have presented to the Emergency Department (ED) and require admission to the hospital wards for further treatment.<sup>1</sup> The hospital has faced challenges in maintaining acceptable waiting times for inpatient beds and the delivery of definite care due to periodic surges in patient flow. This situation has raised concern of patient safety while lodging in ED for inpatient beds.<sup>2</sup>  </p><p>Shortage of dedicated personnel and lack of clinical workflow during COVID-19 pandemic had prevented timely reviews of GM patients in the ED, thus a subset of GM patients waiting in ED did not receive inpatient definite care (IDC) within a 24-hour time frame.</p><p>The hospital&rsquo;s previous electronic medical records system was inadequate for the inpatient team to monitor the status of patients and to track waiting times efficiently. This limitation had hampered the ability to prioritize patients needing urgent care.</p><p>In response to these challenges, the Department of GM is tasked with the critical function of reviewing patients in the ED who are planned for admission. The overarching goal is to ensure that at least 95% of GM patients who wait for an inpatient bed for more than 10 hours receive IDC within a 24-hour window.</p></sec><sec><st>Strategies and Methodology</st><p>From the outset of November 2023, a dedicated team from Acute Internal Medicine Service (AIMS) is assigned the responsibility to review GM patients in ED who are planned for admission. The team comprises of a GM consultant, a registrar, three medical officers and a house officer. The following strategies are implemented to ensure delivery of IDC without delay.</p><p>Morning Chart Review- Medical and house officers do a chart review on the EPIC system (the upgraded electronic medical record platform launched in August 2022) and compile a list of GM patients waiting in ED for IDC at 7 AM on weekdays.</p><p>Same-Day Evaluation- GM patients whose projected waiting time in ED is expected to reach 24 hours by 5 PM are reviewed by consultant on the same day. The rest of the patients who have waited for more than 4 hours in ED are to be reviewed by at least a medical officer.</p><p>Early Definitive Management Plan- Majority of the blood and urine investigations can be ordered and dispatched from ED. Urgent radiological investigations including X rays, computed tomography scan, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound can be performed in ED after discussion with radiologist. Nursing task orders and procedures such as regular vitals, conscious level chart and capillary glucose monitoring, female urinary catheterisation, wound dressings, nasogastric tube insertion and colostomy bag change can be supported by nurses in ED.</p><p>Acute Care Prioritization- Patients who require more acute care are prioritized and these cases will be escalated to registrar or consultant, irrespective of their waiting time in ED.</p><p>On-Call Assessment- Dedicated on-call medical officers are assigned to review patients who have waited for more than four hours during the after-office hours of 5 PM to 8 AM the next day.</p><p>AIMS Ward Admissions- GM patients who are stable and likely to be discharged within 72 hours are assessed for potential admission to the AIMS ward, contingent on meeting AIMS admission criteria.</p><p>Communication Roster- A roster details the GM ED review team is made available on the hospital portal to facilitate communication between ED staff and GM team.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 104 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Percentage of GM patients who have waited for more than 10 hours and have received IDC within 24 hours in Year 2024. Data collected from TTSH healthcare performance office</p></caption><link locator="104_F1"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Lessons Learned</st><p>Effective coordination between the GM team and ED team is imperative. ED nursing and medical staff must promptly communicate any significant changes in a patient&lsquo;s clinical status to the GM team. A well-defined clinical workflow is essential for ensuring timely assessment of patients in the ED. Sustainability poses a challenge due to fluctuating influx of patients. Therefore, it is crucial to allocate sufficient manpower to the GM team reviewing patients in ED <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>.</p></sec><sec><st>Benefits</st><p>Implementing IDC within the ED for GM patients can improve patient safety by identifying individuals at risk of clinical deterioration and enabling early execution of appropriate management plans.<sup>3</sup> It also facilitates the identification of those eligible for discharge directly from the ED with appropriate follow-ups, thereby reducing hospital bed occupancy level.<sup>4</sup> It may decrease the length of hospital stay as definitive management plans and necessary investigations can be arranged and executed from the ED.<sup>4</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Lateef A, Lee SH, Fisher DA, Goh WP, Han HF, Segara UC, Sim TB, Mahadehvan M, Goh KT, Cheah N, Lim AYT, Phan PH, Merchant RA. Impact of inpatient Care in emergency department on outcomes: a quasi-experimental cohort study. <I>BMC Health Serv Res</I>. 2017 Aug 14;<b>17</b>(1):555. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2491-x</p></li><li><p>Liew D, Liew D, Kennedy MP. Emergency department length of stay independently predicts excess inpatient length of stay. <I>Med J Aust</I>. 2003 Nov 17;<b>179</b>(10):524&ndash;6. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05676.x</p></li><li><p>Laam LA, Wary AA, Strony RS, Fitzpatrick MH, Kraus CK. Quantifying the impact of patient boarding on emergency department length of stay: All admitted patients are negatively affected by boarding. <I>J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open</I> 2021 Mar 2;<b>2</b>(2):e12401. DOI: 10.1002/emp2.12401</p></li><li><p>Schuetz P, Hausfater P, Amin D, Haubitz S, Fa&#x0308;ssler L, Grolimund E, Kutz A, Schild U, Caldara Z, Regez K, Zhydkov A, Kahles T, Nedeltchev K, von Felten S, De Geest S, Conca A, Scha&#x0308;fer-Keller P, Huber A, Bargetzi M, Buergi U, Sauvin G, Perrig-Chiello P, Reutlinger B, Mueller B. Optimizing triage and hospitalization in adult general medical emergency patients: the triage project. <I>BMC Emerg Med</I>. 2013 Jul 4;<b>13</b>:12. DOI: 10.1186/1471-227X-13-12</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tan, L. H., Cangco, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.104</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.104</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[104 To achieve 95% of inpatient definite care (IDC) within 24 hours among general medicine patients who are waiting for inpatient beds for more than 10 hours in Tan Tock Seng hospital (Singapore) emergency department]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A75</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A76</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A76?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[105 What is the evidence for virtual wards or hospital-at-home care pathways for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A76?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Methods</st><p>Database searches included MEDLINE and EMBASE (via Ovid), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Studies were selected according to the PICOS criteria outlined below in <cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool version 2 (RoB2) for RCTs, while the observational cohort study was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). A meta-analysis was conducted for the primary outcomes, which were mortality rate and readmission rate.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 105 Table 1</no><caption><p>Inclusion and exclusion criteria for title, abstract and full-text selecti</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>PICOS</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Description</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Population</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Adults aged 18 years or older with an ECOPD presenting to the hospital or who require hospital-led care. </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Intervention</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">VW or HaH care pathways, including ESD and AA, which provide hospital-led care to patients in their own homes. Other home or community care systems not used for the treatment of ECOPD were excluded, including services that offer long-term telemedicine or monitoring for stable COPD in outpatient settings. End-of-life care was also excluded. </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Comparator</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Patients who are admitted to the hospital for an ECOPD and who receive usual care as an in-patient. </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Outcomes</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Co- Primary Outcomes:<br>1. Safety (mortality rate of all causes, in-patient, 7 days, and 30 days)<br>2. Readmission rate in 7 and 30 days.<br>Secondary Outcomes:<br>1. Length of stay in the hospital and length of stay on the VW or HaH care pathway.<br>2. Exacerbation rates up to 12 months after the index exacerbation.<br>3. Patient selection criteria for VW<br>4. Treatments included as part of the care model<br>5. Changes in physiology, including oxygen saturations and respiratory function </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Study Design</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">All randomized and non-randomized controlled trials and observational studies with both an intervention and comparator arm were included. All types of narrative reviews were excluded. Case studies and case series of less than ten participants were excluded. There were no restrictions on study dates or languages. </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria: eleven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one observational cohort study. A meta-analysis conducted for our co-primary endpoints at 30 days, including data from eleven studies, indicated no significant changes in survival or readmission rates attributable to the interventions. Furthermore, pooled analysis across all time points demonstrated no mortality benefit associated with the intervention, with low event rates observed in both groups. However, when all time periods were grouped, there was a signal for a reduced readmission rate in the intervention group. See <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figures 1</cross-ref> and 2.</p><p>Secondary outcomes of length of stay in the hospital and duration of care on the HaH/VW pathways were reported in various ways: some only included the initial inpatient stay, excluding the home service component; others combined both the inpatient and home components; and some reported each metric separately. Overall, there was no evidence that either VW or HaH reduced the total time a patient spent under hospital-led care, whether at home or in the hospital.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 105 Figure 1</no><link locator="105_F1"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>VW and HaH services may be a promising strategy for reducing readmissions in AECOPD, which would traditionally require hospital admission. However, studies reported to date have been small, often single-centred, and have chosen different endpoints to assess outcomes of interest. The findings suggest more evidence is needed to identify the key elements of these services for patients with AECOPD and optimise patient selection.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) 2024. [cited 2024 Apr 17]; Available from:<inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url"> https://goldcopd.org/2024-gold-report/</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>NHS England. Virtual Wards. 2022. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/virtual-wards/</p></li><li><p>Barlow A, Phimister J, Buxton M, Foster D. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Virtual Ward - South and West Hertfordshire Health and Care Partnership. 2023. Available from: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.westhertshospitals.nhs.uk/msgs/West-Herts-COPD-VW-evaluation.pdf</p></li><li><p>NHS. Guidance Note: Frailty Virtual Ward (Hospital at Home for Those Living with Frailty). 2022. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/B1207-ii-guidance-note-frailty-virtual-ward.pdf</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alenazi, B., Hatton, C., Sapey, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.105</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.105</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[105 What is the evidence for virtual wards or hospital-at-home care pathways for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A76</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A77</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A77?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[106 Treatment funding algorithm: a step towards improving access to affordable cancer care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A77?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The present initiative was undertaken in the Department of Medical Social Services (MSS) at Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai a flagship 600 bedded cancer centre governed by the Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India. The hospital receives up to 70,000 new patient registrations, and witnesses more than a million footfalls annually.</p><p>The project was conducted under the leadership of the Medical Superintendent, focusing on cancer patients registered in the General Category and those with limited or no financial resources to access treatment.</p><p>The key issue addressed was the Non-Uniform Funding Mechanism, characterized by complex navigation processes and delays in accessing funds, significantly affecting patient care and outcomes. Studies have shown that financial distress remains a major barrier to cancer treatment, with many patients struggling to afford care due to high out-of-pocket expenses.<sup>1</sup> Additionally, research highlights that financial hardship among cancer patients in India contributes to delayed treatment initiation and worsened health outcomes.<sup>2</sup>  </p><p>We engaged with the relevant stakeholders such as Patients, Clinicians, MSS, IT department, hospital staff and Government representatives for understanding the workflow, identifying gaps in accessing scheme benefits, charting out a process flow for availing multi-step funding schemes and highlighting challenges and barriers faced by both patients and staff.</p><p>All relevant stakeholder staff involved in providing services to patients were identified and actively engaged at this stage to gather insights and address the challenges.</p><p>Regular discussions were held with the stakeholders to present the findings and facilitate discussions about the identified issues, ensuring that all team members were engaged in understanding the problems and contributing to potential solutions.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>To improve patient care, a Government Schemes Enrolment - Eligibility and Funding Algorithm System was developed and implemented.</p><p>An algorithm that automatically identifies patient eligibility for government schemes or philanthropy based on their demographic details. The systems display eligible schemes, eligible funding amounts, and the timelines for receiving funds based on the urgency of need of the patient.</p><p>The process involved following key steps:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Identifying Gaps in Accessing Scheme Benefits (1 month)</p></li><li><p>Charting a Process Flow (1 month)</p></li><li><p>Designing and testing the Algorithm for patient eligibility (2 months)</p></li><li><p>Streamlining System Processes for effective Implementation (2 months)</p></li></l></p><p>To effectively disseminate the changes, relevant staff groups were involved through multiple steps:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Early Engagement and Input</p></li><li><p>Regular Updates and Meetings</p></li><li><p>Training Sessions</p></li><li><p>Feedback and Adaptation</p></li></l></p><p>Staff feedbacks were encouraged during regular meetings, where staff opinions on the new system, particularly regarding ease of use, efficiency, and any challenges faced were discussed.</p><p>Pre- and Post-Implementation Data Comparison of turnaround time for transfer of seed money was done. Seed money is a fund dedicated to support the initial work-up of the patient&rsquo;s evaluation including basic diagnostics for early initiation of treatment.</p><p>The analytical method involved comparing the number of days required for seed money transfers to eligible patients before and after implementation of the algorithm.</p><p>Patients and caregivers seeking treatment in the hospital were interviewed to understand the challenges faced and delays experienced by them in accessing funding. These inputs were used to refine the algorithm. Post implementation feedback was sought to further improve the system.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The changes resulted in a notable reduction in seed money transfer times improving patient access to funding. Before implementation of the Algorithm no seed money transfers took place on the day of request. This increased to 40.5% of patients receiving funds on the same day post implementation of the algorithm. 91.5% eligible patients received seed funding by end of day one, post implementation.</p><p>Benefits included enhanced patient tracking, optimal use of governmental schemes, easier access to funding, faster financial assistance and improved patient outcomes. Studies show that structured financial navigation programs significantly improve financial access to care, reducing delays in treatment.<sup>3</sup> Additionally financial hardship mitigation strategies, such as automated funding identification, have been demonstrated to enhance patient adherence to treatment regimens.<sup>4</sup> Furthermore, research indicates that patient navigation systems play a critical role in improving both financial and clinical outcomes for cancer patients.<sup>5</sup>  </p><p>The change process encountered challenges related to voluntary disclosure by patients, updation of new schemes to the algorithm, offering support to patients not eligible for any scheme, expectation of 100% funding assistance by patients.</p><p>Key lessons emphasized the importance of ongoing stakeholder engagement and transparent communication. Utilizing measurable metrics proved vital for tracking progress and informing adjustments. If starting again, broader stakeholder involvement, structured feedback, and pilot testing would enhance implementation.</p><p>The experience underscores the significance of collaborative engagement and effective communication in healthcare changes. Sharing successful strategies and adopting a patient-centered approach are essential for improving care and ensuring adaptability.</p><p>The implemented changes have significantly improved patient care. The establishment of Single Window Access has streamlined the non-uniform funding mechanism and automated multi-step processes, minimizing inconsistencies. An enhanced patient tracking system have notably decreased the patient funding chasm, indicating faster financial assistance and improved patient outcomes. Overall, the changes have enhanced efficiency and resource allocation within the cancer care system.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Prinja S, Dixit J, Gupta N, Dhankhar A, Kataki AC, Roy PS, Mehra N, Kumar L, Singh A, Malhotra P, Goyal A, Rajsekar K, Krishnamurthy MN, Gupta S. Financial toxicity of cancer treatment in India: towards closing the cancer care gap. <I>Frontiers in public health</I> 2023;<b>11:</b>1065737. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1065737</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Patra A, deSouza R, Nag S, Pant HB, Agiwal V, AY N, Kumar Y, and Murthy G. Burden of financial hardship among breast cancer survivors in Maharashtra, India. <I>Cureus</I> 2024;<b>16</b>(6):e61625. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.61625</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Parikh DA, Rodriguez GM, Ragavan M, <I>et al.</I> Lay healthcare worker financial toxicity intervention: a pilot financial toxicity screening and referral program. <I>Support Care Cancer</I> 2024;<b>32:</b>161. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08357-x</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Edward JS, McLouth LE, Rayens MK, Eisele LP, Davis TS, and Hildebrandt G. <I>Coverage and Cost-of-Care</I> Links: Addressing Financial Toxicity Among Patients With Hematologic Cancer and Their Caregivers. <I>JCO Oncology Practice</I> 2023;<b>19</b>(5):e696&ndash;e705. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.22.00665</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Kline RM, Rocque GB, Rohan EA, Blackley KA, Cantril CA, Pratt-Chapman ML, Burris HA, and Shulman LN. Patient navigation in cancer: the business case to support clinical needs. <I>Journal of Oncology Practice</I> 2019;<b>5</b>(11):585&ndash;590. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.19.00230</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Samant, V., Sawakare, S., Chaturvedi, N., Acharya, S., Mane, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.106</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.106</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[106 Treatment funding algorithm: a step towards improving access to affordable cancer care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A77</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A78</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A80?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[109 Bridging the gap: increasing access to oncology learning opportunities]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A80?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Context</st><p>This project was initiated in the Oncology Department at Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth. The &lsquo;Acute Oncology Teaching Day&rsquo; has had two successful installments to date and is advertised to all trainees within the Wessex Deanery in United Kingdom. The primary focus of our work was to increase Oncology teaching and learning opportunities for healthcare professionals including resident doctors, advanced clinical practitioners, nurses and physician associates.</p></sec><sec><st>Problem</st><p>During medical school and resident doctor training years, there is limited exposure to Oncology patients, with Oncology topics minimally integrated into the medical school curriculum.</p><p>Assessment of Problem and Analysis of its Causes</p><p>We evaluated published evidence on the availability of Oncology teaching at undergraduate and postgraduate level. Oncology was identified as one of the more challenging specialties with inadequate teaching in medical school, with only about 1&ndash;2 weeks total of scheduled teaching.<sup>1</sup> Unfortunately, fewer than half of medical trainees rotate through Oncology at foundation doctor or core medical trainee grades.<sup>2</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Intervention</st><p>We planned a &lsquo;peer-led&rsquo; teaching day where we requested Consultants and Registrars to deliver a range of topics that enhanced trainees&rsquo; approach to acute oncological presentations. The first installment of the teaching day covered topics such as electrolyte imbalances, intracranial disease, breathlessness, bowel dysfunction, neutropenic sepsis, immunotherapy-related toxicities, pain control, metastatic spinal cord compression, haematological emergencies, and a group session on human factors. Due to high levels of interest, a second day was organised. The upcoming third installment will cover different topics including malignant ascites, superior vena cava obstruction, cancer of unknown primary, and feeding at end of life.</p></sec><sec><st>Strategy for Change</st><p>We established a programme that promotes the field of Oncology to resident doctors as a rewarding career and equips healthcare professionals with the knowledge to tackle oncological emergencies.</p><p>We collaborated with Oncology-interested trainees to organise the event to also support their professional development and enhance commitment to specialty. Organisation involved advertising, communicating with attendees, and creating surveys. Email invites were sent out to healthcare professionals within the Wessex Deanery two months prior to the scheduled date.</p><p>We collected pre- and post-teaching day feedback for each session delivered. Feedback 8&ndash;12 weeks after the event was also gathered to assess whether knowledge imparted has been successfully implemented into practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Measurement of Improvement</st><p>We were able to accommodate 107 attendees over the two teaching days. Analysis of feedback showed a significant improvement in the confidence of attendees in managing acute oncological presentations (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>). We collected insight of attendees on the overall logistics and the following areas were identified for improvement: quiz software used, more nurse-specific teaching and provision of refreshments.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 109 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Double bar chart demonstrating significant improvement in the level of confidence of attendees in managing acute oncological presentations</p></caption><link locator="109_F1"></fig></p><p>We received 17 responses to our follow-up survey sent to 107 participants. The results received were encouraging as 100% said the teaching benefitted their daily practice. 82% reported that that they had managed an Oncology patient since the teaching. The follow-up survey considered feedback received on the day and acquired further insight on potential nursing-related topics that would be useful such as the management of diabetes in malignancy, escalation triggers and their role in the end-of-life care pathway.</p></sec><sec><st>WHAT IT MEANS</st><p>  <b>Effects of Changes:</b>  </p><p>In conclusion, healthcare professionals felt more confident in their approach to Oncology emergencies. Our aim is to establish a regular 6-monthly teaching programme. Given that we identified an immense under-representation of Oncology as a specialty at medical school level, we hope to also integrate Acute Oncology teaching into their curriculum. Timely recognition and treatment of oncological emergencies by healthcare staff would improve the quality of care delivered.</p><p>  <b>Lessons Learned:</b>  </p><p>Anticipated challenges include current staffing pressures and costs. Medical trainees often struggle to get study leave. We aim to advertise dates for teaching at least 2&ndash;3 months ahead so that trainees can apply for leave in advance. To maximise the number of trainees who can attend, we decided to keep the event free. However, we were unable to provide refreshments as a result. For future installments, we are contacting potential sponsors to make the event more comfortable for all.</p><p>  <b>Messages for Others:</b>  </p><p>With the increasing incidence of cancer within the population, all healthcare professionals, regardless of their specialty, will come across patients who have a history of malignancy, are currently undergoing cancer treatment, or receive a new cancer diagnosis during their admission. It is important to provide our trainees with a skillset that helps them recognise oncological emergencies timely and contribute meaningfully to the holistic care of Oncology patients.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Rallis KS, Wozniak AM, Hui S, <I>et al</I>. Inspiring the future generation of oncologists: a UK-wide study of medical students&rsquo; views towards oncology. <I>BMC Med Educ</I>. 2021;<b>21</b>(1):82. Published 2021 Feb 2. doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02506-0</p></li><li><p>Payne S, Burke D, Mansi J, <I>et al</I>. Discordance between cancer prevalence and training: a need for an increase in oncology education. <I>Clin Med (Lond)</I>. 2013;<b>13</b>(1):50&ndash;56. doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.13-1-50</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nagpal, R., Hunter, M., Moiz-Ud-Din, M., Misbah, D., Wilson, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.109</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.109</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[109 Bridging the gap: increasing access to oncology learning opportunities]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A80</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A81</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A81?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[110 Effects of municipality-based cardiac rehabilitation - patient activation, quality of life and physical improvement]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A81?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Little is known about the quality and effects of municipality-based rehabilitation for patients with chronic diseases. To monitor and ensure sufficient quality levels, systematic collection of high-quality data is needed. This creates a knowledge platform and a baseline for quality improvement. The goal is to provide patients with the best possible conditions for living with chronic disease through ongoing quality improvement of municipality-based rehabilitation.</p><p>In the Central Denmark Region the municipalities are responsible for the non-pharmacological rehabilitation of patients with chronic diseases as heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes. Health professionals and quality experts were concerned that little or no systematic data were available for quality assessment. To address this, a system for registration of clinical data and patient-reported outcome was developed in a collaboration between municipalities and the Central Denmark Region.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Valid and systematic registration of relevant, quantifiable data, day-to-day digital tools for assessing quality as well as evidence-based quality indicators were made available. Once the data collection system was established, health professionals began learning how to utilize data for quality improvement.</p><p>Potential effects of municipality-based rehabilitation were investigated by analysing how the level of patient activation and health related quality of life impacted a quality indicator measuring physical improvement in patients. The effect was analysed by descriptive methods supplemented by logistic regression. Furthermore, improvements and challenges not reflected in the registered data were explored through focus group discussions with relevant leaders and health professionals.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The impact has been multidimensional, beginning with frustrations and evolving into a deeper understanding of what can be achieved by use of systematic quality data. It is now possible to make the first assessments of the potential effects of rehabilitation across municipalities.</p><p>Results for patients in cardiac rehabilitation indicate positive effects by increased patient activation and health-related quality of life by the end of a municipality-based rehabilitation program. Patients with lower initial activation level or medium degree of quality of life are more likely to achieve a 10% improvement or more in physical tests at the end of the rehabilitation program.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andersen, T. V., Thygesen, M., Nielsen, B. K., Soendergaard, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.110</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.110</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[110 Effects of municipality-based cardiac rehabilitation - patient activation, quality of life and physical improvement]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A81</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A81</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A83?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[113 Improving joy in work in Beechcroft]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A83?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Beechcroft is the Regional Child &amp; Adolescent Mental Health Inpatient Unit in Northern Ireland.</p><p>Young people under 18 are admitted with a range of complex and high-risk mental illnesses. We have a multidisciplinary team (MDT) of 100 staff including nurses, doctors, health care workers, social workers, psychologists and occupational therapists.</p><p>The COVID pandemic, significant staff shortages and a 31% increase in referrals since 2019 hugely impacted on staff wellbeing. The Belfast Trust staff experience survey, November 2022, showed staff wellbeing in Beechcroft was one of three priority areas for improvement.</p><p>Evidence shows by improving joy in work, you can improve staff wellbeing, reduce burnout and absence, improve patient safety and reduce unintended harm.<sup>1</sup> It improves quality of care, as staff wellbeing has a direct impact on therapeutic relationship.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>The project was commenced December 2022 using IHI Model for Improvement and was coproduced with MDT and nursing staff. To understand our system we surveyed staff electronically in January 23 asking what makes a good and bad day and What Matters to You? In February 23, we used &lsquo;post-it-note posters&rsquo; to collect practical change ideas from all staff with 83 responses. Main themes were staffing levels, breaks and wellbeing. The most popular staff ideas developed and tested using PDSA cycles.</p><p>We developed a 10 point colour-coded good day rating scale for staff to rate their working day. This was our main outcome measure. Charts were displayed across 4 locations in the unit. Baseline data was collected January 2023, then measured daily for one week every month after that. Baseline median good day score was 5.7/10.</p><p>Balancing measures were staff absence and real-time patient feedback. Process measures were the numbers using rating scales and staffing numbers compared to the unit&rsquo;s acuity score.</p><p>Our aim was to Improve Good Day rating score (1&ndash;10, 10 best), as a measure of staff wellbeing and joy in work, of staff in Beechcroft Inpatient Unit by 2 points by July 2023.</p><p>Change ideas 2023</p><p>1. Kitchen Appliances &ndash; March</p><p>2. Away Days - April Go-Karting</p><p>3. Team Lunches &ndash; monthly from April</p><p>4. Tea and coffee trolley for meetings - May</p><p>5. Complementary Therapies for staff - June - November funding obtained for six months of complementary therapy sessions</p><p>6. Staff and Patient Choir - July and December Weekly 45 minute drop in choir sessions led by music therapist.</p><p>7. Sensory Attachment Intervention (SAI)&ndash; March 24 Introduction to SAI co-facilitated by Lead OT to promote awareness of the intervention for young people and staff.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Since the project began, staff wellbeing for the whole team has increased by 16% (0.9 points). Good day score improved from 5.7/10 points at baseline to 6.6/10 by February 24. The data shows a shift above the median since August 2023, indicating our changes have made a sustained improvement to staff wellbeing.</p><p>The MDT showed the largest improvement (compared to nursing staff). MDT wellbeing increased by 39% (1.9 points). There has been a continual shift above the median since July 2023 and a trend in August 2023, indicating significant change due to our project</p><p>Engagement and wellbeing scores for our team improved by 10%, in the trust staff experience survey, June 2023 and Beechcroft is now in Top 20% scoring teams in Trust.</p><p>Very low Good Day scores correlate with nursing staff shortages and assaults on staff. Staff absence improved overall. Numbers using rating scales were maintained at 16/day. Real time patient feedback improved.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Change ideas co-produced with staff led to significantly improved joy in work for the whole team.</p><p>Our Good day rating charts are a successful way to measure joy in work - a great visual representation of both individual wellbeing and team atmosphere.</p><p>Positive feedback from staff reports a sense of hope, being listened to, valued and that change is possible</p><p>Staff shortages reduce joy in work for nursing staff despite project changes.</p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Institute for Healthcare Improvement Framework for Improving Joy in Work, 2017</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelly, C., Donoghue, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.113</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.113</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[113 Improving joy in work in Beechcroft]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A83</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A84</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A85?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[116 Leadership and followership to grow QI capability: a sustainable near-peer mentorship model for early career doctors]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A85?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Early career (resident) doctors&rsquo; access to QI training is hit and miss. Support is patchy and the use of a structured change method is often overlooked. A sustainable approach to empowering the next generation of doctors to make change happen is required.</p><p>Resident doctors in postgraduate training in London can struggle to access training to meet their QI curriculum requirements. Educational Supervisors are not always equipped to support them. Informal discussions were conducted to illicit entry barriers to QI training. The theme of being &lsquo;time poor&rsquo; came through strongly and so a course was designed to be easy to access via small bite size asynchronous learning pieces accessible via mobile phones and laptops. A blended learning course was designed, combining this online learning with virtual workshops and mentorship to complete a full QIP in 4 months. Parents of patients were given free places and encouraged to share their own experience of the course with others.</p><p>Paediatric doctors in London who already had significant QI experience worked with QIClearn to develop this 4 month course. Over several cohorts, changes were tested based on feedback from the teaching faculty. Some participants expressed an appetite for continuing to support other resident doctors and a pathway was created for them to become mentors, initially as mentors in training before becoming mentors and supporting their peers in subsequent cohorts.</p><p>This near-peer mentorship model has evolved and has now been adopted for resident doctors in several other parts of England and Northern Ireland. It has also been trialled with some success in other medical specialities and most recently within a mixed cohort of resident doctors and consultants within one hospital. Leadership from Training Programme Directors and Heads of School (for postgraduate training in the region) has been crucial.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>Our aim was to increase the number of resident doctors who have both the knowledge and experience of using structured change method to try and improve care.</p><p>Our primary measure is the number who complete a QIP and a poster that illustrates their diagnostics together with each element of the Model for improvement and at least 3 PDSAs to answer the question &lsquo;Have I achieved my Aim?&rsquo; Our secondary measures include:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Number who participate in the course and complete a baseline run chart</p></li><li><p>Number who continue to use what they&rsquo;ve learnt to undertake more QIPs</p></li><li><p>Number who publish their work at conferences and in journals.</p></li><li><p>Number of learners who undertaken Mentor in Training and become mentors.</p></li><li><p>Number of mentees supported per mentor</p></li></l></p><p>The Model for Improvement has been used at every stage to inform our development of a sustainable course. Changes have been tested and learner progress has been tracked using a run chart. These have included:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Clarity of course structure</p></li><li><p>Use of gamification to incentivise learning and sharing of work</p></li><li><p>Use of an improvement measure to track in-course and inter-cohort progress</p></li><li><p>Testing and adapting of learning resources</p></li><li><p>Free places for parents of patients from the inception</p></li><li><p>Development of Mentor in training model</p></li><li><p>Facilitation of near-peer learning</p></li><li><p>Development of Teaching Faculty</p></li><li><p>Recognition of completion and significant achievement of milestones</p></li><li><p>Presentation of trainees work at national and international conferences</p></li><li><p>Upgrading of online resources to address learner differences e.g. neurodiversity</p></li><li><p>Move to virtual teaching (and benefits of reducing carbon footprint)</p></li><li><p>Spread across the country</p></li><li><p>Cross speciality and cross career cohorts</p></li><li><p>Creation of a Mentor resource hub</p></li></l></p><p>Feedback is sought at four touch points during the course on online and virtual content and delivery. Reflections are also sought at specific points in relation to the involvement of stakeholders, patients and colleagues. Resident doctors are encouraged to engage patients and parents early on in the course.</p><p>Course development has been shaped using the Model for Improvement. Small changes have been tested over a 6 year period. The majority have been adopted and a few have been abandoned. Most have been planned in advance using Plan-Do-Study-Act. A few have developed spontaneously and some of these have subsequently been adapted and adopted. A run chart is used to track progress of QIPs within each cohort and another measure, based on Kirkpatrick&rsquo;s Evaluation model chart, is used to track knowledge translation into practice over the duration of each cohort. We have seen a slight increase in engagement since moving from face to face to virtual workshops.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>229 learners have completed the QI education programme (&gt;17% of paediatric resident doctors in the region) with 68% becoming QI Change Champions. Eleven learners completed the programme for mentorship training: supporting new learners and, in time, new mentors in training. Four remain active mentors and four are taking sabbaticals and plan to return.</p><p>Many ideas for change came directly from feedback from the participants and their mentors. Changes are usually discussed with the faculty and introduced on one course before being incorporated into other courses. The majority of these ideas have been adapted over time and have become business as usual. A few have been abandoned and some that were paused as we moved from face to face to virtual delivery of workshops have been adapted and reinstated e.g. evening option for QI clinics. Rate of progression and fidelity of PDSAs have improved following of a small increase in number and frequency of sessions with the teaching faculty and mentors.</p><p>The projects undertaken by resident doctors on this course often impact directly on their ability to provide safe, timely and effective care to patients. They are also encouraged to consider benefits to themselves in respect to their well-being and agency to make change happen. Resident doctors are hungry to learn. They thrive when empowered to use their skills to make change happen. Ability and willingness to deliver education and training to others is part of the curriculum, and for those that enjoy this aspect, the mentor in training pathway to becoming a mentor is popular. Followership by resident doctors to become mentors has proved to be a significant factor in the sustainability of this course.</p><p>Near-peer mentoring on a blended QI education programme can build skills for QI in the workplace and help support and deliver future programmes. Ongoing evaluation is planned to follow mentors over time to explore sustainability and spread across disciplines.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davey, N., Runnacles, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.116</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.116</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[116 Leadership and followership to grow QI capability: a sustainable near-peer mentorship model for early career doctors]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A85</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A86</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A86?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[117 Tackling waiting list for memory assessment services]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A86?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>The prevalence of dementia in the UK varies by age, with the risk increasing significantly after the age of 65 with around 2% in people aged 65&ndash;69 to around 25% in those aged 85 or older.<sup>1</sup> The UK government has responded to the challenge of dementia with a wide range of policies and initiatives aimed at improving care, research, and awareness.<sup>2</sup> However, health services worldwide and within the UK required significant prioritisation and adaptation to respond to the Covid 19 pandemic.<sup>3</sup> There are 4 memory assessment services (MAS) within Northamptonshire County and our MAS (Rushden and Wellingborough) team carried out the QI project tackling the post covid waiting list of memory services. According to the Referral to treatment pathway (RTT), the MAS service should carry out an initial assessment within 4&ndash;6 weeks of referral. However, during covid exigencies the waiting times increased to 18 weeks and beyond. The waiting list for the team on the day of QI Project initiation was close to 200 patients compared to 30 precovid.</p></sec><sec><st>Methodology</st><p>We systematically analysed the increasing waiting list using QI methodologies<sup>4&ndash;6</sup> and formulated terms of reference to govern the execution of the QI project tackling the waiting lists for MAS. The MAS team agreed on change ideas with greatest impact and without huge implementation hurdles. The consultant psychiatrist carried out a detailed analysis of the current referral and diagnostic processes and identified areas where improvements could be made. We examined the scheduling and appointmentbooking and moved from offering initial assessment as home visits to the clinics except where such arrangements were not feasible. We redesigned the diagnostic process, offered additional training and the support to staff, developed assessment templates to reinforce the quality of the assessment process, utilised the skill mix within the team.</p><p>The project used the PDSA (plan do study act) model for improvement methodology to test the interventions.This was done by undertaking small PDSA cycles to verify whether improvements proposed were sustainable. The Driver diagram was used at the initial stages of project initiation to identify primary and secondary drivers for the project and the change ideas that would concomitantly aid in the benefits realization of the drivers. Patients were consulted informally at the inception of the project and feedback was gathered during assessments. The project commenced and went live on 26th January 2023 with the build-up of meetings to specify the Memory Assessment services referral pathway and referrals which are received predominately from Primary Care with a standard set for the service that the patient is to be seen within the 6 weeks. The focus group was designed to elicit the qualitative insights pertaining to the negative and positive intended or unintended phenomenological observations engendered by the QI project.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The QI project attained the predefined objectives. The changes have been sustained from project inception to the present. Protocols and action plans have been formulated so that project results will be sustainable in the immediate, short-term and long-term.</p><p>The first outcome measure was an understanding of the total length of time (both before &amp; after intervention) from the initial GP referral to the first triage by MAS staff. This time frame has shortened remarkably as evidenced by a significant reduction in referrals being sent back to the GP due to incompleteness of the referral dossier. Similarly, over 95% of the referrals are now coming with all the requisite preliminary investigations having been carried out e.g. haematological investigations and other assessments.</p><p>The second outcome parameter was configured around ascertainment of the total length of time (both before &amp; after intervention) a patient would take to be moved from the waiting list to an initial in-depth assessment by a CPN, Consultant psychiatrist and other medical staff. So, before the interventions the median waiting period on this parameter was around 12 weeks (84 days) but after the changes the time is reduced to 4weeks (28 days). Joint assessment improved the diagnostic rates per week and reduced the number of appointments per patient by 50%, improvingthe productivity and efficiency of the team members by being able to see more patients and save on travel costs and time.</p><p>The third outcome parameter aimed at reducing the estimation of the total length of time (both before &amp; after intervention) following the initial assessment it takes for onward referral to the neuroimaging appointment at local general hospitals. The project envisaged at reducing current median waiting time from 8 months (240 days) to 6&ndash;8 weeks (56 days) in 80% of the referrals and this was facilitated by regular and improved communication with radiology department, patients and carers.</p><p>The staff wellbeing improved as the project exceeded their expectations. Core staff has continued to work together and foster a positive culture of working towards a common purpose. The results were shared locally, with neighbouring trusts, presented to the Westminster Health Forum seminar and the practice was adapted by three other MAS teams within the Northamptonshire County.</p><p>The six service userswho participated in the feedback were very satisfied with the QI project and the efficient service they received. The presence of digital platforms made the organisation of meetings, workshops and supervisions efficient without any disruptions to patient care.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Matthews FE, Arthur A, Barnes LE, <I>et al</I>. A two-decade comparison of prevalence of dementia in individuals aged 65 years and older from three geographical areas of England: results of the cognitive function and ageing study I and II. <I>Lancet</I> 2013;<b>382</b>:1405&ndash;12. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61570-6</p></li><li><p>NHS England. Prime minster Dementia 2020 Challenge. 2020. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prime-ministers-challenge-on-dementia-2020/prime-ministers-challenge-on-dementia-2020</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>NHS England. Dementia wellbeing in the COVID-19 pandemic. NHS England <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/C1280_Dementia-wellbeing-in-the-COVID-pandemic-v3.pd</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Coughlin K, Posencheg MA. Quality improvement methods - part II. <I>J Perinatol.</I> 2019;<b>39</b>:1000&ndash;7. doi:10.1038/s41372-019-0382-1</p></li><li><p>Chan CT, Chertow GM, Nesrallah G, <I>et al</I>. How to use quality improvement tools in clinical practice: a primer for nephrologists.<I> Clin J Am Soc Nephrol.</I> 2016;<b>11</b>:891&ndash;2. doi:10.2215/CJN.11521015</p></li><li><p>Bonner HV, Jones JR, Arguello AM, <I>et al</I>. Quality improvement tools in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. <I>J Surg Orthop Adv.</I> 2021;<b>30</b>:125&ndash;30.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jan, F., Gatawa, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.117</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.117</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[117 Tackling waiting list for memory assessment services]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A86</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A87</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A87?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[118 Optimizing the quality of service in the injection room]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A87?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Given the increasing overall service volume in hospitals, the original environment and business allocation methods of the Injection Room at NTU BioMedical Park Hospital have become inadequate to cope with the steadily growing service demands. Thus, optimizing the quality of service in the Injection Room has become an imperative task. The purpose of this study is to shorten patient waiting times, enhance injection accuracy, and reduce the number of negative feedback incidents stemming from abnormalities.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>To achieve the research objectives, we implemented several measures:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>  <b>Environmental Improvement -</b> Laptop Installation on Treatment Carts. Adding two treatment carts: two separate treatment carts and equipment will be allocated.</p></li><li><p>  <b>Patient Segregation -</b> Segregating injections for adults and children to improve service efficiency for different age groups. Concurrently, we divide into two queue number machines: one for adults and one for children.</p></li><li><p>  <b>Increase in Injection Room personnel</b> and establishment of <b>waiting support mechanisms.</b>  </p></li><li><p>  <b>Strengthening of educational training and regular assessment</b> of medication administration practices in the Injection Room</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results and Conclusion</st><p>Our efforts have yielded significant results:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>  <b>The average waiting time calculation:</b> Prior to the improvement, the average waiting time was 7 minutes and 19 seconds. During the implementation period (2023. Jun.- Aug.), the average waiting time was 2 minutes and 25 seconds; after the improvement (Sep. 2023- Jun. 2024), the average waiting time decreased to 2 minute and 5 seconds.</p></li><li><p>  <b>The adverse events calculation:</b> From September 2023 to June 2024, there were zero abnormal events reported in the Injection Room.</p></li><li><p>  <b>The completion rate of the medication administration process</b> was 100% from September 2023 to June 2024.</p></li></l></p><p>Fortunately, through the implementation of a series of effective measures, we have successfully reduced patient waiting times, enhanced injection accuracy, and minimized the occurrence of abnormal events, thereby significantly elevating the service quality of the Injection Room. These accomplishments underscore the efficacy of our initiatives and offer invaluable insights and benchmarks for the operation of the Injection Room.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chiang, P. Y., Huang, H. P., Chiu, X. Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.118</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.118</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[118 Optimizing the quality of service in the injection room]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A87</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A88</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A88?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[119 Clinical audit on polypharmacy and PRN medication adherence to BNF limits within a psychosis early intervention team - analysis of a single audit cycle]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A88?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Polypharmacy (the use of multiple psychotropic medications) has historically been common in psychiatry, especially in treatment of chronic psychosis. International surveys over past decades reported that up to nearly half of patients with schizophrenia were prescribed more than one antipsychotic concurrently.<sup>1</sup> This practice is largely at odds with clinical guidelines, which recommend antipsychotic monotherapy at the lowest effective dose to minimise adverse effects.<sup>2</sup> Evidence for routine antipsychotic polypharmacy remains limited and equivocal, with no clear benefits but a higher burden of side effects (e.g. extrapyramidal symptoms, metabolic and cardiovascular risks) compared to monotherapy.<sup>1</sup> The British National Formulary (BNF) provides evidence-based dosage limits for psychotropics to guide safe prescribing; exceeding these recommended dose limits or combining medications without justification can compromise patient safety. We aimed to evaluate prescribing practices in an early intervention psychosis service against these safety standards, focusing on the prevalence of polypharmacy, adherence to BNF dose guidelines, and adequacy of prescription documentation.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim</st><p>To analyse the psychotropic prescribing patterns in a Psychosis Intervention and Early Recovery (PIER) team and determine whether they align with BNF guideline recommendations for safe prescribing.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We conducted a cross-sectional audit of all patients under the care of a regional early intervention psychosis service (PIER team) in late August 2024. Medication data for each patient were extracted from electronic health records. Prescriptions were categorised by drug class and dose. Key audit criteria included: (1) incidence of polypharmacy (defined as concurrent use of &ge;2 medications from the same therapeutic class, particularly antipsychotics); (2) inclusion of clear instructions for any &lsquo;as-needed&rsquo; (PRN) medications (e.g. indication and dosing guidance); and (3) adherence to BNF maximum dose limits for each psychotropic. We also noted whether documentation provided clinical rationale for polypharmacy or for any doses exceeding BNF recommendations. Data were analysed descriptively against the audit standards (BNF guidance and safe prescribing principles).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 417 patients were included. Polypharmacy was identified in 39 patients (9.4%). Among these polypharmacy cases, approximately 20% had no documented rationale in the notes to justify the use of multiple medications. PRN psychotropic medications (typically for acute anxiety, agitation, or insomnia) were commonly prescribed; however, about one-third of PRN prescriptions lacked specific administration instructions or clear parameters for use. The vast majority of patients (about 90%) were managed on a single psychotropic agent, and in most cases doses were modest &ndash; well below BNF maximum limits (often under 50% of the recommended maximum dose). Instances of high-dose prescribing (exceeding 100% of the BNF recommended maximum) were rare, observed in roughly 1% of patients. These few high-dose cases primarily involved antipsychotic therapy; notably, 20% of such cases did not have the required high-dose monitoring forms or explicit justification recorded, indicating documentation gaps. Overall, the audit found that prescribing practices in the service were largely in line with guideline recommendations, with limited use of polypharmacy and infrequent breach of dose limits.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>In this early intervention psychosis service, prescribing habits were generally safe and adherent to established guidelines. The prevalence of antipsychotic polypharmacy was low and high-dose prescribing was an uncommon exception, reflecting a practice of favouring one primary agent at therapeutic doses. This aligns with national recommendations aimed at reducing polypharmacy and its attendant risks.<sup>2</sup> Importantly, the audit highlighted areas for improvement in documentation: when polypharmacy is employed or higher doses are used, clinicians did not consistently record their justification or complete the necessary monitoring forms. Likewise, some PRN orders lacked clarity, which could pose safety risks if not addressed. The findings underscore the need for ongoing vigilance in prescribing practices &ndash; ensuring every deviation from monotherapy or standard dosing is justified and documented &ndash; to uphold patient safety. Steps such as regular medication review meetings, enforcing use of pro-forma for high-dose or combined therapy justification, and better communication (including explicit PRN instructions) have been recommended to further strengthen safe prescribing in our service.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Barnes TR, Paton C. Antipsychotic polypharmacy in schizophrenia: benefits and risks. <I>CNS Drugs</I>. 2011;<b>25</b>(5):383&ndash;399. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21476610/</p></li><li><p>Paton C, Barnes TR, Cavanagh MR, Taylor D, Lelliott P. High-dose and combination antipsychotic prescribing in acute adult wards in the UK: the challenges posed by p.r.n. prescribing. <I>Br J Psychiatry</I> 2008;<b>192</b>(6):435&ndash;439. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18515893/</p></li><li><p>Gallego JA, Bonetti J, Zhang J, Kane JM, Correll CU. Prevalence and correlates of antipsychotic polypharmacy: a systematic review and meta-regression of global and regional trends from the 1970s to 2009. <I>Schizophr Res</I>. 2012;<b>138</b>(1&ndash;3):18&ndash;28. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22534420/</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ahmed, M., Oozeer, U., Ahmed, S., Aljabal, M., Chakraborty, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.119</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.119</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[119 Clinical audit on polypharmacy and PRN medication adherence to BNF limits within a psychosis early intervention team - analysis of a single audit cycle]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A88</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A88</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A92?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[124 Sustained high completion rate of an electronic health record integrated safety checklist over 2 years in a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A92?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Our CICU has utilized a safety checklist during patient rounds for many years to address modifiable aspects of patient care that may contribute to harm events such as central line associated blood stream infection (CLABSI), catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), inaccurate nutrition delivery, skin injuries, and cardiac arrest. However, in its original paper format, there was no easy way of tracking actual use and subsequent effect or lack thereof on harm outcomes. A pre-intervention audit demonstrated mean daily checklist completion of only 51%. Poor safety checklist completion made it unclear whether the intervention was impacting patient care. Direct observation, staff surveys, and focus groups revealed users found the paper checklist to be burdensome, lacked relevance to all patients, and was often not completed due to difficulty locating the checklist. The original SMART aim was to improve safety checklist completion in the CICU to 75% in 3 months.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A smart digital safety checklist was deployed in the electronic health record (EHR) to improve ease of locating and completing the checklist. End users access the tool by clicking on an icon from a team&rsquo;s list of patients (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>) and view the checklist directly in a navigator view (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>). Logic was developed to only display questions that are relevant to the current patient and their lines, drains, and airways (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>a,b). A different version of the checklist exists for both morning and evening rounds (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>c). The smart digital safety checklist was launched in September 2022. Front line providers caring for the patient were tasked with presenting the questions on rounds and recording the team&rsquo;s answers. Human factors nudges were used to encourage completion including a caution icon (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>) to draw attention to the incomplete task. To decrease question burden, the checklist also varied by day of the week with a different safety focused question based on current unit initiatives.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>An RStudio dashboard was created to automatically track checklist completion (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F3">figure 3</cross-ref>). Individual completion rates were provided to each attending physician quarterly. The project surpassed the goal of an average completion of 75% with average completion unit wide remaining at greater than 90% for 2 years since project initiation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Contributing factors to ongoing success include ease of access to the checklist due to EHR integration, decreased burden by limiting questions to those relevant to each patient, and human factors nudges. We have demonstrated sustained use of the checklist and now seek to evaluate whether use of the checklist has directly improved patient care by decreasing harm events. Beyond the ability of the EHR to help record completion of the checklist questions, the discreet data capture of answers will allow the team to more easily study the impact of the checklist on patient outcomes. Utilizing the EHR did come with barriers such as upgrades to the overall EHR impacting functionality of the checklist and needing to rely on providers with specialized skills, who may move onto different positions, to maintain and update the checklist.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 124 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Sample patient list showing icon clicked to access smart digital safety checklist. The icon changes to a green checkmark after the checklist is completed for a patient</p></caption><link locator="124_F1"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 124 Figure 2</no><caption><p>a) Sample morning rounds checklist for a patient with a central venous line, arterial line, and Foley catheter b) Sample morning rounds checklist for a patient without central venous line, arterial line, or Foley catheter c) Sample evening rounds checklist for all patients</p></caption><link locator="124_F2"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F3"><no>Abstract 124 Figure 3</no><caption><p>CICU safety checklist completion tracking dashboard</p></caption><link locator="124_F3"></fig></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dietzman, T., Schwartz, E., Bird, G., Romer, A., Moran, S., Cates, M., Heichel, J., Carr, L., Hehir, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.124</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.124</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[124 Sustained high completion rate of an electronic health record integrated safety checklist over 2 years in a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A92</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A95</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A95?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[127 The spread and scale academy. Preparing teams to spread and scale solutions across their system and wider]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A95?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Global health is in crisis. Life expectancy has dropped, health inequalities are growing wider, and climate change poses a severe threat to the lives of thousands. No single organisation is prepared or equipped to tackle this alone, meaning leaders are often facing these unprecedented, global challenges in an isolated way. Historically, we have not listened to, learned from, and shared with each other; we are lacking the space, skills or intention to do so.</p><p>The three day Spread and Sale Academy has been at the forefront of The Dragon&rsquo;s Heart Institute (DHI) which was created by Cardiff and Vale University Health Board following the initial waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. We recognise that there is an inability to share evidence-based improvements leading to unwarranted variation in access to quality care across Wales and beyond. The &lsquo;know do gap&rsquo; states that it takes on average 17 years to get evidence incorporated into practice (Morris <I>et al</I>, 2011) and we haven&rsquo;t got that time.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We have delivered 14 academies to over 700 learners. 74% of learners at the latest academy strongly agreed that they felt more confident in enacting large-scale change with 100% of learners stating they would recommend to a colleague.</p><p>We have utilised a learning system to support the delivery and continuous development of the Academies. This has consisted of gathering feedback, engaging with delegates post event, wash ups and sense making sessions. We have drawn themes around barriers and enablers to spread and scale and utilised our extensive networks to disseminate our learning, through teams including Academi Wales and Welsh Governments National Climate Emergency team and Future Generations team.</p><p>The tools and techniques taught on the 3 days both cover the &lsquo;inner work&rsquo; of leading on large scale change and the practical tools such as completing a 90-day plan. The academy enables learners to shift from asking &lsquo;how can get all these people to do what I want them to do&rsquo; to &lsquo;how can I help all of these people do what they want to do&rsquo;.</p><p>Our impact is embedded in the success of our leaners with 343 have attending our community of practice and growing the network of leaders trained in spread and scale and large-scale change. Each project brining its own challenges in measurement and we have collected information in several formats including process, value add and impact measures. We also have a several case studies, interviews and videos highlighting success.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Learners have reported an estimated total cost saving of &pound;6,538,620. This includes;</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>1.1 million saved in avoiding adverse tracheostomy incidents across Waels per year</p></li><li><p>&pound;13,000 saved in rationalising the use of IV Paracemtol on inpatient wards</p></li><li><p>&pound;2.4 million saved in avoided bed days from supportive palliative care over five years</p></li></l></p><p>During the 3-day academy leaners are pushed to ensure that their aim statement is compelling, and solutions solve the problem for those who are most affected. We ensure that the main outcome measure reflects this and is something the learners truly care about.</p><p>Spread and scale is not the same as quality improvement. While there is some overlap, spread and scale is a discipline with different sets of skills required. We are at the cutting edge of this emerging field and believe we have an obligation to spread the approach to as many people as possible who can benefit from it. Our aim is that by July 2030, 10,000 leaders will be prepared and equipped to listen, learn and share with each other across organisational, national and international boundaries to solve global health challenges</p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. <I>J R Soc Med</I>. 2011;<b>104</b>(12):510&ndash;520.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Griffiths, H., Jordan, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.127</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.127</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[127 The spread and scale academy. Preparing teams to spread and scale solutions across their system and wider]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A95</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A96</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A96?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[128 Pioneering leadership development today for tomorrows greatest challenges]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A96?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The Dragon&rsquo;s Heart Institute (DHI) was created by Cardiff and Vale University Health Board to preserve and share the learning from the COVID-19 response in Wales. The Climb programme provides a new approach to leadership development focussed on reflective practice, community, systems thinking, storytelling and immersive, challenge-based learning. Delivered by a range of international experts alongside military and third sector partners, it is open and free of charge to all staff from Welsh health, social care and third sectors, irrespective of previous experience or seniority.</p><p>The pandemic presented an opportunity for unprecedented challenge and change. the UK witnessed the courage of key workers who &lsquo;ran towards the fire&rsquo;. This multi-agency, multi-disciplinary response created the conditions for leaders to work across systems, adapting and innovating within our public services at unprecedented pace to care for our population. There was a sense of a common purpose, urgency and drive as relationships were forged between individuals, institutions and countries.</p><p>Nevertheless, the isolation of leaders in our system was felt acutely by some during the pandemic and in its immediate aftermath, as those leaders who stepped forward were often unknown to and unsupported by the systems they worked in, unprepared for the challenge they faced, and often working alone to lead change. Burnout and other mental health and wellbeing issues are commonplace as a result and staff retention remains a key priority for NHS Wales to date.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>In 2020, the Climb team undertook a rigorous research and benchmarking process to plan Climb, which would be funded by Welsh Government&rsquo;s All-Wales Intensive Learning Academy for Innovation in Health and Social Care. Three cohorts have now completed the programme with a fourth underway, all connected into a growing alumni community.</p><p>Climb is a development programme for emerging and existing leaders, but also a network for leaders around the world, to work across systems and organisational boundaries to improve the provision of health and care to their local population. It seeks to recreate that sense of a common purpose, urgency and drive across health and social care to develop leaders who can respond to the next great challenges we will face together.</p><p>It is a 10-month programme, in which diverse cohorts of 30+ &lsquo;pioneers&rsquo;, selected via a novel application process involving the completion of escape rooms. Leaders come from all professional backgrounds and levels of seniority, develop together, undertaking a series of teaching modules, immersive experiences and opportunities to be exposed to global thought-leaders in transformation. Climb has been described as &lsquo;a community, rather than a course&rsquo;. The bond developed between the close-knit group of pioneers is one of the programme&rsquo;s unique strengths and can have a revolutionary impact on the culture of siloed working that exists within our public services.</p><p>Climb uses the Kirkpatrick model for evaluation, gathering data on delegates&rsquo; experience of Climb, relevance and applicability of academic teaching, connections formed between candidates, teachers and expert speakers, including subsequent collaborations, projects supported, graduates&rsquo; career progression, personal development, patient impact/cost impact for health and care services.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Over the course of the last four years, we have continually iterated and co-produced the programme with delegates and graduates to ensure maximum impact, with several alumni returning to design and deliver new teaching sessions to create a self-sustaining generation of leaders.</p><p>As a result of Climb, delegates surveyed from the first three cohorts reported a marked increase in their leadership abilities and sense of connectedness with their programme peers. Qualitative feedback included statements such as: &lsquo;Without Climb, I would have definitely left the NHS.&rsquo; Additionally, to date, 25 graduates have successfully received promotion following the course, ascribing their success to newfound skills and self-belief because of the programme. Several projects have also been led by graduates, including the supportive palliative care service in Cardiff and Vale UHB, which has resulted in 1211 fewer hospital days for its users and recently won an NHS Wales Award.</p><p>Climb is constantly iterating based on the feedback and coproduction of its delegates. We have learnt a lot from them including the importance of greater representation in our faculty, which we have endeavoured to incorporate. The greatest challenge we face is securing sustainable funding streams to continue to develop and deliver the programme for future cohorts.</p><p>The core message from this experience is the power of community-driven leadership development in healthcare. By fostering a collaborative environment that transcends organisational boundaries, emerging leaders can be equipped with the skills and support necessary to tackle future challenges. We encourage others to embrace innovative approaches in leadership training that emphasize reflective practice, storytelling, and immersive learning, and are looking to connect and collaborate with other similar networks and programmes.</p></sec><sec><st>The Future</st><p>Future funding will allow growth of the Climb alumni. There is ambition to formally mobilise bespoke groups or multi-disciplinary teams of Climb alumni that share a passion that can tackle regional issues. This harnesses a coalition of the willing and generates a perpetual demonstration of impact and value that will ensure that Climb is the course that industry leaders are completing to grow their network and make positive change across public and private sector organisations.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kentish, B., McGuffie, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.128</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.128</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[128 Pioneering leadership development today for tomorrows greatest challenges]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A96</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A96</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A98?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[131 The development and implementation of Q-rounds in general inpatient wards]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A98?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Since 2020, Jessa Hospital in Hasselt, Belgium, has not maintained an internal audit system. On one hand, the Covid pandemic required an all-hands-on-deck approach, leaving no time for additional quality checks. On the other hand, in 2021, we began implementing FlaQuM (Flanders Quality Model). This model provides a general framework to implement a quality management system that is defined by the hospital itself. Therefore, we had the opportunity to compose a set of quality standards that are in accordance with the provided care and focus points within our organization. To monitor these quality standards, we developed a new internal audit system.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>To determine necessary quality checks, we selected critical points from the generic requirements framework from the Belgian government. Additionally, we took into account the needs reported by the wards, by management and by the board of directors, and those emerging from our healthcare indicators, and incident reports of patient safety.</p><p>Eventually, a checklist with scores of 0, 1 or not applicable was developed with over 70 items. It includes aspects related to the nursing ward, hospital hygiene and patient records. Before implementation of the internal audits &ndash; called Q-rounds &ndash; the checklist and set-up were continuously discussed between the quality team, wards, quality director, CNO and CMO.</p><p>The completed checklist is utilized in three types of Q-rounds, each conducted annually:</p><p>- Q-round with a quality staff, a hospital hygienist, and a member of the hospital management or the board of directors;</p><p>- Self-check at the ward;</p><p>- Peer review between two wards.</p><p>The results are discussed immediately, and the report is communicated shortly after by email. A dashboard shows the evolution within each ward for every Q-round criterium, as well as hospital-wide compliance for each criterium. Twice a year, the hospital-wide results are discussed with the board of directors to define and follow-up hospital-wide actions.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In 2023, we initiated the implementation of Q-rounds across 18 general nursing wards. By 2024, we successfully conducted Q-rounds in nearly all general nursing wards, expanding to a total of 29. In addition, we began developing checklists for specific wards in collaboration with the decentralized quality references, resulting in the creation of specialized checklists for intensive care, coronary care unit, operating room, cath lab, therapy rooms, geriatrics day hospital and neonatal care. Checklists to be completed during the course of 2025 include dialysis, psychiatric wards, emergence care unit and radiology.</p><p>To implement the Q-rounds across all inpatient departments, it was important to focus on communication at all levels within the organization. Additionally, we recognize the strength of involving support services (hospital pharmacy, technical service, ...). We learned over time that we should not overestimate the digital skills of caregivers and that sufficient training is needed to ensure proper execution of the Q-rounds.</p><p>To conclude, the internal audit system ensures both ward-specific and hospital-wide improvements for caregivers and patients. It is valuable to invest in setting up an internal audit system with simple reporting and immediate feedback. Close collaboration with the ward staff (including referent nurses and head nurses) is crucial to achieving success. By having the wards&rsquo; staff conduct two of the three Q-rounds themselves (self-check and peer review), they are held accountable to perform quality improvements.</p><p>Reporting through a dashboard makes it easy to visually identify hospital-wide deficiencies, establish improvement actions, and continuously monitor quality compliance.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anna-Marie, G., Jessie, A., Katrien, H., Leen, H., Anke, S., Nele, V., Eline, V., Elke, D. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.131</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.131</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[131 The development and implementation of Q-rounds in general inpatient wards]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A98</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A99</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A100?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[134 Measuring the effect of recovery and transmural care in a psychiatric hospital]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A100?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Hospitals allocate significant resources to recovery and transmural care, aiming to enhance patient involvement and success in their recovery journeys. Despite these efforts, the impact on recovery care remains largely unquantified, often neglecting patient perspectives (Castro, E., 2018). This study seeks to balance quantitative measurements with patient voices by implementing a mixed-method approach for auditing recovery and transmural care.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Our research employed a mixed-method strategy, beginning with desk research to identify key indicators and best practices (Hendriksen-Favier, A., van Rooijen, S., &amp; Rijkaart, A. M., 2010). These were refined through co-design methodologies, resulting in prioritized indicators for recovery and transmural care (England, N. H. S., &amp; Improvement, N. H. S., 2021). In the subsequent phase, both quantitative and qualitative research methods were applied, including surveys, departmental tours, and data analysis. Quantitative findings informed qualitative research, where patient focus groups provided supplementary experiential insights (Raats, I., &amp; Versluijs, M., 2019) ( van de Glind, I., Bakker-Jacobs, A., Triemstra, M., de Boer, D., &amp; van der Wees, P., 2018).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The study culminated in a comprehensive script to evaluate recovery and transmural care, integrating communication, audits, and focus groups. Through co-design, patients reported increased information and communication regarding recovery care. Moreover, even those not directly involved noted improved communication, attributed to a tailored communication model. Healthcare staff reported enhanced knowledge and interest in recovery and transmural care, leading to specific departmental actions promoting a recovery-oriented approach.</p><p>One of the key metrics in our study is the Net Promoter Score (NPS) of patients. These scores will be monitored throughout each study over the coming years. This data will serve as the foundation for our results.</p><p>This study highlights the importance of combining quantitative metrics with qualitative insights to effectively measure and enhance recovery and transmural care, ensuring patient voices are integrated to the evaluation process.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>England NHS, Improvement NHS. (2021). Framework for involving patients in patient safety. NHSE, NHSI.</p></li><li><p>Raats I, Versluijs M. (2019). Een praktische handleiding voor patie&#x0308;ntenvertegenwoordigers.</p></li><li><p>Castro E. (2018). Patient participation and Empowerment. The involvement of experts by experience in hospitals.</p></li><li><p>van de Glind I, Bakker-Jacobs A, Triemstra M, de Boer D, van der Wees P. (2018). Literatuurstudie over het gebruik van PROMs. Huidige kennis en wetenschappelijk bewijs voor het gebruik van Patient Reported Outcome Measures Utrecht: Nivel &amp; Nijmegen: Scientific Centre for Quality of Healthcare.</p></li><li><p>De Troyer V, Pecqueux M, Van Malderen L, De Wulf J. (2021) Participatie in de zorg, een inspiratiegids. Zorgnet Icuro</p></li><li><p>Hendriksen-Favier A, van Rooijen S, and Rijkaart AM. (2010). Handreiking ROPI. Recovery Oriented Practices Index. Index voor een herstelgerichte ggz. Utrecht: Trimbos-Instituut</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marieke, D., Frederiek, D., Gina, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.134</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.134</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[134 Measuring the effect of recovery and transmural care in a psychiatric hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A100</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A101</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A26-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[39 4AT for delirium]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A26-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Delirium (sometimes called &lsquo;acute confusional state&rsquo;) is a common clinical syndrome characterised by disturbed consciousness, cognitive function or perception, which has an acute onset and fluctuating course. Age (being 65 or over) is a major risk factor. Complications of delirium include increased mortality, increased length of hospital admission, and higher incidence of dementia.<sup>1</sup> Delirium can be prevented and treated if recognised early and managed urgently. The current NICE guidelines state that any patient presenting to hospital age 65 years or older must be assessed for delirium within 24 hours and receive multicomponent intervention by the multidisciplinary team. NICE recommends the use of the 4AT delirium screening tool in wards. 4AT has been shown to be the most reliable method of screening with 88% sensitivity and specificity in validation studies.<sup>1</sup>  </p><p>Data from 104 patients was collected from the Care of the Elderly (COE) wards at Ipswich Hospital (Haughley, Grundisburgh, Waveney and Woodbridge) on one day during the period 14/11/23 to 04/12/23. Data collection was conducted by looking through the medical notes retrospectively for the first 2 weeks of transfer to the ward. Collectively, we noted that out of 104 patients on the four wards aged &gt;65 years, only 17% had delirium screening done. The aim of this quality improvement project (QIP) was to increase the proportion of patients over the age of 65 years old admitted onto the four older people&rsquo;s wards at Ipswich Hospital who have a 4AT delirium assessment completed from 17% to &gt;40% by the 30th April 2024 to help support the identification of delirium and optimise its management.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>Multidisciplinary teaching sessions and baseline audit data presentation were done on 19/02/24 to inform staff about the importance of delirium screening and to educate on how to use the 4AT tool. Another teaching session about delirium screening was done during the departmental induction of junior doctors on 08/04/24. This project also pioneered the creation of the 4AT delirium screening sticker which were distributed to all four COE wards by the second week of April 2024. The purpose of the sticker is to make delirium screening more accessible and visible and, therefore, would encourage staff members to complete delirium screening. Upon distribution, the team also talked with the ward doctors to discuss the proper use of the 4AT stickers.</p><p>As with the baseline audit, the post-intervention data were collected from the four COE wards during the last week of April. Data collection was conducted by looking through the medical notes retrospectively for the first two weeks of transfer to the ward. Data was entered into an Excel spreadsheet which included 4AT, AMTS, and details of delirium recognition by doctors and nurses.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The post-intervention data showed that the proportion of patients aged 65 years or over who had delirium assessment admitted on the four COE wards increased to 31% (increase of 14% from the baseline audit). This 9% short of the target which was 40%.</p><p>The data showed improvement in delirium screening with 31% of patients having been screened for delirium after the interventions, compared to 17% in the baseline data. However, this means that almost 70% of patients are still not being screened for delirium. Better performance of 4AT assessments on some wards were driven by senior doctors who emphasised on the importance of delirium screening and expressed expectations on the wards. This implies that senior doctors need to be more involved to influence other members of the MDT to take part on delirium screening. The data also showed disconnection between the medical and nursing teams where delirium was not being recognised by both teams proportionately. This suggests that the nursing team needs to be equally involved in actively screening patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>This QIP showed that we are slowly but surely improving in delirium screening. However, there is still a lot of work to be done to reach satisfactory outcomes. With the availability of 4AT stickers on the wards and teaching sessions among members of staff, delirium screening can be more approachable and visible to any MDT member.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Nice.org.uk. (2010). <I>Recommendations | Delirium: prevention, diagnosis and management in hospital and long-term care | Guidance | NICE</I>. [online] Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg103/chapter/Recommendations#preventing-deliri [Accessed 17 Mar. 2025].</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Olario, N., Shoote, J., Ahmed, A., Afreen, S., Mason, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.39</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.39</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[39 4AT for delirium]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A26</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A26</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A26-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[40 Beyond the calm: improving physical health monitoring after rapid tranquilization administration]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A26-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Physical health monitoring following Rapid Tranquilisation (RT) is critical to ensuring patient safety, particularly in CAMHS settings where vulnerable patients are at higher risk of adverse effects. However, an internal audit at St Andrew&rsquo;s Healthcare revealed that 80% of RT cases lacked consistent recording of required post-RT observations, including both contact and non-contact monitoring. This non-compliance with local policy and NICE guidelines was further highlighted during a CQC inspection. A key barrier to adherence was the absence of a structured documentation process and a mechanism for real-time feedback to staff.</p><p>This project aimed to improve adherence to post-RT physical health monitoring by introducing a structured recording system, first in paper format and later transitioning to an electronic form within the RiO electronic health record system. The goal was to achieve 100% compliance with physical health monitoring requirements through the paper form and subsequently reach 90% completion of electronic forms following RT administration.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The Model for Improvement guided this quality improvement initiative, with multiple PDSA cycles used to test, refine, and embed the changes <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>. The intervention followed a phased approach:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>  <b>Phase 1: Standardized Paper Form Implementation</b>  </p></li></l></p><p>A structured paper form was designed, tested, and implemented within a division to facilitate post-RT monitoring. The process was reinforced through local leadership support and training.</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>  <b>Phase 2: Transition to Electronic Recording</b>  </p></li></l></p><p>After successful adoption of the paper form, an electronic form was developed within the RiO system to streamline documentation and provide real-time feedback. Compliance data was monitored, and quality control dashboards were introduced to support daily safety huddles.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 40 Figure 1</no><link locator="40_F1"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>  <b>Improved Compliance Over Time:</b> Completion rates for electronic forms increased from 13% in October to 100% by December 2023, sustaining 100% compliance in January 2024 <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>.</p><p>  <b>Reduction in Paper Form Usage:</b> The transition to electronic recording resulted in a significant decline in paper form use, with much less paper forms used from December onwards <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F3">figure 3</cross-ref>.</p><p>  <b>Enhanced Patient Safety:</b> By embedding a structured documentation process and real-time feedback, adherence to monitoring guidelines improved, ensuring timely identification and management of potential adverse effects.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 40 Figure 2</no><link locator="40_F2"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F3"><no>Abstract 40 Figure 3</no><link locator="40_F3"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The introduction of a structured approach to post-RT physical health monitoring&mdash;first via a paper form and then through an electronic system&mdash;successfully addressed a critical compliance gap. Real-time quality control dashboards and integration into safety huddles further reinforced adherence and sustainability. This initiative has now been scaled across the organisation to enhance patient safety and standardise best practices in physical health monitoring post-RT administration.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ilea, A., Roychowdhury, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.40</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.40</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[40 Beyond the calm: improving physical health monitoring after rapid tranquilization administration]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A26</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A28</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A28-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[41 To PRI or not to PRI ... thats the question]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A28-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>In 2009 VMSzorg introduced a safety management system for Dutch hospitals, including a method to analyze and constrain risks: Prospective Risk Inventory (PRI). This method was considered to be a promising and powerful tool.</p></sec><sec><st>Discussion</st><p>A PRI originally takes about 6 sessions of 90 minutes, each session attended by 4&ndash;6 content experts supported by a chairman, a process supervisor and a reporter.</p><p>Healthcare professionals considered the PRI-method inconvenient for use on a regular base: too complex and time consuming. Despite their intention to improve care processes carefully, they struggled with the method. As a result changes were made without overthinking the risks.</p></sec><sec><st>Intervention</st><p>To restructure PRI to be practical, compelling and less time consuming.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>After a dozen trials with the PRI it was noticed that healthcare professionals didn&rsquo;t adopt this method.</p><p>Inspired by the Lean philosophy we used Lean tools to visualize the process of identifying, weighing and minimizing potential risks for patient safety in new or adjusted processes.</p></sec><sec><st>Sessions improved PRI</st><p>0 Preparatory consultation (30 min)</p><p>I Risk assessment (90 min)</p><p>II Decision go/no go (30 min)</p><p>III Evaluation (60 min)</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>See <cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref> for the comparison between the original versus improved PRI</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 41 Table 1</no><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Effect on</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Original PRI</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Improved PRI</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="3" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Number of sessions </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Required time </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3780 minutes </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">870 minutes </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Required period </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6&ndash;9 months </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4 months </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">PDCA </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Only P&amp;D </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Completed </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Requests for PRI </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2 each year </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">25 each year </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Time required per PRI was reduced with 77%.</p></li><li><p>PRI-method was expanded with an evaluation (= PDCA completed).</p></li><li><p>Healthcare professionals evaluate the improved PRI to be practical and worth the effort.</p></li><li><p>Total number of PRI-requests increased from 2 to 25 per year.</p></li><li><p>The method is nowadays so popular that it&rsquo;s also used to improve standard processes</p></li><li><p>Departments more and more execute a PRI without any help. The method is so familiar they can do it themselves.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Lessons learnt</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Learn to understand a new method by doing before changing it</p></li><li><p>Evaluate frequently: does a method support professionals in their daily work or not?</p></li><li><p>Use the tools you have: visualizing is a powerful instrument</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Patient perspective</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Prior to a PRI analysis of effects for patients (PER=Patient Effect Report).</p></li><li><p>Prior to a PRI we sometimes make a patient journey.</p></li><li><p>Members of our client council sometimes participate in a PRI.</p></li><li><p>Some PRI&rsquo;s are executed after simulating the new process. Volunteers then act as a patient and tell how they experienced the situation.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Message for others</st><p>A method should support healthcare professionals in their daily work, then they will adopt it.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dalen, I. G. v.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.41</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.41</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[41 To PRI or not to PRI ... thats the question]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A28</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A28</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A28-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[42 Reducing never events in theatres: our journey to embedding national safety standards for invasive procedures (NatSSIPs 2)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A28-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Never Events are defined as serious, preventable patient safety incidents that should not occur. They are commonly used as a proxy measure for the general safety culture of an organisation. Examples of a &lsquo;never event&rsquo; include retained swabs or performing a procedure on the wrong limb.</p><p>The National Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures 2 (NatSSIPs 2) are a national set of standards intended to enable safe, reliable and efficient care to every patient having an invasive procedure. NatSSIPs 2, introduced in January 2023, lay out two inter-related sets of standards (organisational and sequential) that are intended to share best practice and learning. They support multidisciplinary teams and organisations to deliver safer care. The organisational standards set out clear expectations of how the organisation should support teams to deliver safe invasive care. The sequential standards are the procedural steps that should be in place for every patient undergoing an invasive procedure. By embedding and implementing the NatSSIPs 2 framework, using Quality Improvement methodology and creating a Theatre Safety Programme, this healthcare organisation hasn&rsquo;t experienced a &lsquo;never event&rsquo; for over 44000 operations and counting.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A driver diagram was developed using the NatSIPPs2 framework as an evidence-based guide. An expert faculty was formed that included the theatre services manager, a quality improvement expert, a clinical psychologist and a clinician with human factors expertise. A member of theatre staff was recruited and trained as an improvement advisor to deliver the change package. Regular faculty meetings with the advisor were scheduled to progress testing of ideas and implementation of successful changes into business as usual.</p></sec><sec><st>The interventions included</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Training in human factors and fortnightly simulations of recent incidents. Protected time for multi-disciplinary sessions. The learning from these simulations formed ideas for quality improvement projects that would then be tested and implemented. Safety Culture Surveys are used pre and post human factors training to measure impact on teams and individuals.</p></li><li><p>Monthly &lsquo;Back to Basics&rsquo; training and mentoring led by the theatre safety teams and delivered by theatre leads covering a different subject each month on a rolling programme with pre and post training surveys showing an improvement in understanding in these areas.</p></li><li><p>Standardisation of WHO checklists using QI principles to encourage better engagement were co-designed with staff and implemented across the organisation.</p></li><li><p>&lsquo;Quiet for the Count&rsquo; helped to develop a safety culture and understanding between all members of the theatre teams as to the importance of reducing distractions whilst a surgical count was being undertaken. This was spread across the organisation and evolved into an anaesthetic based QI project &lsquo;Noise Reduction for Induction&rsquo; looking at ways to reduce noise levels and distractions during key anaesthetic tasks.</p></li><li><p>Psychological Safety surveys are performed at regular intervals and capture qualitative data of ideas for improvement as well as capture a quantitative measure of psychological safety.</p></li><li><p>Mandatory staff study days and induction training for new staff members include NatSSIPs 2 Safety Principles and Human Factors training.</p></li><li><p>Information leaflets produced for patients, carers and service users &ndash; empowering them to understand the process of the NatSSIPs safety checks. to speak up if they see an error in their care</p></li><li><p>All Theatre Leads/Managers are working towards becoming Quality Improvement Coaches in the organisation to support staff in their areas through improvement projects.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The organisation hasn&rsquo;t experienced a theatre &lsquo;never event&rsquo; for over 400 days and counting or 44000 procedures. This is measured using a t-chart and demonstrates a significant improvement.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>There has been a reduction in theatre never events, for this organisation, by using the NatSIPPs2 framework and developing a programme of workstreams that combine human factors, psychological safety and quality improvement methodology to deliver safer care for patients undertaking invasive procedures. It is hoped that others can learn from this strategy of forming an expert faculty with the development of an improvement advisor from the theatre staff team to aid in delivery.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clarke, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.42</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.42</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[42 Reducing never events in theatres: our journey to embedding national safety standards for invasive procedures (NatSSIPs 2)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A28</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A29</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A30-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[44 How to build sustainable bridges: the TULAY project, codesigning meaningful change across stroke services in the Philippines]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A30-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Low-middle income countries have a high burden of stroke, with rates of disability and death greater than those in higher-income countries. In the Philippines, stroke is a primary cause of morbidity and the second leading cause of mortality, equating to approximately 87,402 deaths per year. Most of the cost of healthcare is borne out-of-pocket by stroke survivors and their families, resulting in limited availability and accessibility of services for lower- and middle-income groups. There is also a lack of any community-based rehabilitation for stroke in the Philippines, and research is limited. Different challenges are experienced across urban and rural settings.</p><p>Bridges Self-Management (Bridges) is an evidenced based approach developed in the UK which uses co-design and quality improvement methods to enable healthcare staff to work collaboratively and personalise self-management support to the needs of people living with different long-term conditions. To date there is no self-management approach used within Philippine healthcare for stroke survivors and family carers. Most gain little or no ongoing access to treatment or support. However, a self-management approach (such as Bridges) which has been co-designed and refined for different settings and populations has been found to impact on knowledge, skills, and confidence of not only people living with long-term conditions but also those that support them such as healthcare workers.</p><p>The TULAY project <unl>Tulong Ugnayan ng Lingap At gabaY </unl>(which means help relationships and guidance) commenced in 2022 to &lsquo;bridge the gap &lsquo;between people&rsquo;s needs and services to the stroke community. It will develop a context-appropriate, community-based stroke support programme, consisting of self-management and training resources to augment the rehabilitation and recovery process.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A national survey, in-depth narrative interviews and a staged approach to co-design working across six municipalities. Multiple engagement activities will be employed to build relations and collaboration with communities across the Philippines.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Our national survey has reached more than 2000 policy makers, clinicians, stroke survivors and family carers. These outputs together with engagement activities across multiple Barangays (small administrative districts) have contributed rich insight into needs and priorities through a wide range of stakeholders&rsquo; views. Further in-depth narrative interviews have informed a staged approach to codesign underpinned by an Experienced-Based Co-design framework. Six Barangays are involved in co-designing and implementing their own self-management activities and outputs.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Implications</st><p>TULAY is the first project to integrate the evidence base of an existing self-management approach together with contextual and population wide data. But critically, the direction, priorities and outputs will be guided by the local priorities of stroke survivors, family carers and Barangay healthcare workers. The project completes in 2026; if successful TULAY can be used as an exemplar case study to inform person centred and sustainable self-management interventions for other populations with disabilities.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jones, F., Dar Juan, A. M. S., Rosales- de Vera, J. A., Otter, P., Ridley, S. B.-, Kent, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.44</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.44</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[44 How to build sustainable bridges: the TULAY project, codesigning meaningful change across stroke services in the Philippines]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A30</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A30</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A30-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[45 Improving satisfaction with nutritional counseling by expanding direct consultation experiences with dietitians after health screenings in South Korea]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A30-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Nutritional management plays a critical role in the prevention and treatment of chronic diseases. At Seoul National University Healthcare system Gangnam Center dietitians provide nutritional counseling following health screening. Direct nutritional counseling is provided when health screening results are received in person. however, if the results are received over the phone, nutritional counseling is replaced with an information sheets. This study aimed to expand the nutritional counseling experience in the same format as the health screening results consultation to raise awareness of nutritional management. Additionally, we aimed to improve client&rsquo;s satisfaction with nutritional counseling and contribute to the health improvement of health screening clients.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This study was conducted among clients who underwent health screening at Seoul National University Hospital Gangnam Center from April to September 2023, specifically targeting those who chose health screening programs that included nutritional counseling. The study included 952 clients who received in-person counseling and 2,132 clients who received phone counseling. After medical-result counseling from the doctor, nutritional counseling was also provided in the same method. Afterwards, a satisfaction survey is sent via text message. The satisfaction survey included five questions.<sup>1</sup> Numbers 1 to 4 were on a 5-point scale, and number 5 was in the open-ended suggestions.</p></sec><sec><st>Result</st><p>The average age of the in-person counseling group was 57.29(&plusmn;11.05) years with a BMI of 23.19(&plusmn;3.48)kg/m<sup>2</sup>, the average age of the phone counseling group was 53.37(&plusmn;9.74)years, with a BMI of 23.16(&plusmn;3.28)kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Among the 2,132 clients who received a phone counseling group, 327 clients (approximately 15%) could not be reached, so a missed nutrition counseling message was sent. Out of these, 144 clients called back and completed counseling, while 183 clients(10% of the total phone counseling group) did not receive the nutritional counseling and were instead provided with an informational sheet. After the nutritional counseling, satisfaction surveys were sent via text message. A total of 170(18%) from in-person counseling group and 302 clients(17%) from phone counseling group responded to the survey. The overall monthly satisfaction by counseling method was 4.73, 4.69, 4.93, 4.84, 4.86, 4.94 for in-person counseling, and 4.82, 4.82, 4.91, 4.81, 4.83, 4.87 for phone counseling. When comparing overall satisfaction, two groups had an average score of 4.83 (in-person counseling) and 4.84 (phone counseling) out of 5 based on the four survey items.</p><p>In terms of detailed satisfaction, the respect/consideration category received average score of 4.93 for in-person counseling and 4.95 for phone counseling. The professionalism category received average score of 4.88 for the in-person counseling group and 4.86 for the phone counseling group. For the change in perception of nutritional management, we received a score of 4.81 for the in-person counseling group and 4.84 for the phone counseling group. Finally, in the willingness to reuse the service in the future category, both groups scored 4.71. In the open-ended suggestions, several clients expressed a desire for personalized meal plans specific to their health conditions, as well as nutritional analyses of commonly consumed meals from restaurants.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Both in-person and phone-based counseling groups gave high satisfaction score, all above 4.7 points, across all categories of detailed satisfaction. This indicates that clients were generally very satisfied with the nutritional counseling they received, regardless of the counseling method. These results suggest that dietitians should continue to enhance their expertise and further expand nutritional counseling through various. Additionally, from a healthcare system perspective, expanding access to professional nutritional counseling can contribute to preventative chronic diseases, encourage healthier lifestyle habits, and ultimately reduce long-term healthcare costs.</p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Ki Bo Choi, Song Mi Lee, Seung Min Lee, <I>et al</I>. Patient satisfaction and perception on nutritional counseling services quality. <I>J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr</I>. 2017;<b>46</b>(2):251&ndash;258.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oh, S., Lee, I., Hong, K., Dept, N. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.45</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.45</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[45 Improving satisfaction with nutritional counseling by expanding direct consultation experiences with dietitians after health screenings in South Korea]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A30</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A31</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A32-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[47 Senior daily patient review in acute medicine at a district general hospital]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A32-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Senior-Daily Patient Review (S-DPR) plays a crucial role in ensuring high quality, patient-centred care in acute medicine. This contributes to early detection of issues, collaboration among healthcare professionals, efficient resource utilization, and continuous improvement in the delivery of healthcare services.</p><p>Due to pressures on the hospitals across the NHS, many District General Hospitals like Lincoln County Hospital (LCH) have a lot of their acute medical patients stuck in Accident and Emergency (A&amp;E) wating for a bed on Medical Emergency Assessment Unit (MEAU) often for &gt;24 hours. They would be clerked and have Post-Take Ward Round (PTWR) in A&amp;E and a few will miss their next day S-DPR (Consultant or Registrar) until they move to MEAU.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To ascertain how many patients miss S-DPR in Acute Medicine (AM) at LCH and improve this to &ge;95% as per NHS &lsquo;Seven Day Services Clinical Standards&rsquo; which states that patients should be reviewed by a senior at least ONCE EVERY 24 HOURS, seven days a week.</p></sec><sec><st>Methodology</st><p>Data was collected from patient&lsquo;s notes over 1-week to identify those who did not have a S-DPR for at least 24 hours spread across A&amp;E and MEAU.</p></sec><sec><st>Issue</st><p>32 patients missed their S-DPR in the last week of October 2023 &ndash; all in A&amp;E.</p><p>Average number of AM patients per day in A&amp;E were 37. Average daily patients under AM were 83 (37 in A&amp;E and 46 in MEAU).</p><p>About 1-in-5 patients missed daily review in A&amp;E. Some patients did not have a S-DPR for 48 hours. These patients had varied diagnosis from PTWR like Acute Coronary Syndrome, Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, Acute Kidney Injury, etc.</p></sec><sec><st>Intervention</st><p>A dedicated Registrar was appointed on most days for S-DPR in A&amp;E for patients who had their PTWR the previous day and still waiting for bed in MEAU. If there was no Registrar appointed for S-DPR on the day, A&amp;E PTWR Consultant reviewed these patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In April 2024, second cycle was conducted over one week to assess improvements. On average, there were 25.5 AM patients daily in A&amp;E and 46 in the MEAU. The Registrar conducted S-DPR for 5 patients/day, who would have otherwise been missed. These patients had diagnoses like community-acquired pneumonia, hyperkalaemia, alcoholic hepatitis, and diabetic ketoacidosis, with one patient being discharged directly from A&amp;E. Only 2 patients missed their S-DPR during this period. This translated to only 1.6% patients missing S-DPR in comparison to 17% before intervention (figure1).</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 47 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Average Percentage of Patients missed</p></caption><link locator="47_F1"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The results demonstrate that pressure and poor patient flow at LCH led to many patients missing their S-DPR. A short-term solution, involving a dedicated Registrar in A&amp;E, improved this, with &ge;95% of patients now receiving S-DPR (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref> from 83% to 98.4%). For a long-term fix, an electronic system is recommended to track clerking doctors and PTWR details. This will ensure that patients needing S-DPR are easily identified. The project emphasizes the importance of S-DPR and supports ongoing quality improvement, aligned with NHS &lsquo;Seven Day Services Clinical Standards&rsquo;, to enhance care and patient outcomes at LCH.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 47 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Percentage of Patients Receiving Daily Reviews across Cycles</p></caption><link locator="47_F2"></fig></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Majeed, A., Ahmad, M., Yaqub, M. D., Shehzad, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.47</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.47</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[47 Senior daily patient review in acute medicine at a district general hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A32</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A32</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A32-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[48 Papillaedema pathway QIP]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A32-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><p>Improving Timely Diagnosis and Management of Papilledema: A Quality Improvement Initiative at Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth</p></sec><sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Papilledema is a critical clinical finding that requires urgent investigation to rule out life-threatening conditions such as intracranial hypertension and space-occupying lesions. Delays in obtaining MRI and lumbar puncture (LP) can result in missed or late diagnoses, leading to adverse outcomes such as permanent vision loss.<sup>1</sup>  </p><p>Existing guidelines from the BMJ recommend that patients with suspected papilledema undergo MRI within 24 hours, followed by LP as soon as possible. However, Our audit at Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, identified significant delays, with only 30% of patients receiving MRI within the recommended timeframe and just 31% undergoing timely LP. Some patients waited up to 16 days for imaging and 24 days for LP, raising concerns about patient safety and adherence to best practice guidelines.<sup>1</sup>  </p><p>Various strategies to improve diagnostic efficiency have been explored in clinical settings but achieving a sustainable and effective solution has remained challenging. A structured, hospital-wide clinical pathway was introduced to optimize the investigation process for patients presenting with papilledema. The objective of this initiative was to evaluate the impact of a new standardized pathway on MRI and LP timing in line with BMJ recommendations.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A quality improvement project was conducted at Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, focusing on patients with newly diagnosed papilledema. The intervention involved the development and implementation of a structured clinical pathway, which was co-designed with input from neurology, radiology, acute medicine, and ophthalmology teams. The pathway was published on the hospital intranet and disseminated via email to ensure accessibility for relevant staff.</p><p>The implementation followed a stepwise approach, incorporating principles of the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) methodology:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Approval and Dissemination (Month 0): The pathway was formally approved by radiology and neurology consultants and shared with hospital staff.</p></li><li><p>Post-Implementation Adaptation (Month 1): A one-month period allowed clinicians to integrate the pathway into routine workflows.</p></li><li><p>Data Collection and Monitoring (Months 2&ndash;7): Daily tracking of MRI and LP scheduling was conducted over six months to assess adherence to the pathway.</p></li><li><p>Re-audit and Evaluation (End of Month 7): The impact of the intervention was assessed through a re-audit, and findings were shared with key departments to review progress and address remaining challenges.</p></li></l></p><p>Outcome measures included the percentage of patients receiving MRI within 24 hours, the time from MRI to LP, and overall adherence to the BMJ guidelines. Descriptive statistics and comparative analysis were performed to evaluate improvements over baseline data.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>During the study period, data were collected for patients presenting with papilledema before and after pathway implementation. The re-audit demonstrated significant improvements in adherence to guideline-recommended investigation timelines:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>MRI Timing: The proportion of patients receiving MRI within 24 hours increased from 30% to 56.5%. The longest recorded MRI wait time decreased from 16 days to 7 days, with 82% of patients receiving MRI within four days.</p></li><li><p>LP Timing: The proportion of patients receiving an LP or a documented decision regarding LP following MRI increased from 31% to 56.5%. The longest recorded LP wait time was reduced from 24 days to 17 days.</p></li><li><p>Follow-Up Compliance: 100% of patients were referred to neurology, ensuring ongoing specialist review, and 73% received follow-up with ophthalmology for continued assessment.</p></li></l></p><p>These findings indicate that implementing a structured clinical pathway led to measurable improvements in the timeliness of papilledema investigations, enhancing patient safety and diagnostic efficiency.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>This quality improvement initiative demonstrated that a structured pathway can significantly reduce delays in the investigation of papilledema. MRI and LP were completed more efficiently, ensuring earlier diagnosis and intervention for affected patients.</p><p>The key success factors of this initiative included multidisciplinary collaboration, clear dissemination of guidelines, and continuous monitoring of compliance. However, challenges remain in achieving 100% adherence to the 24-hour MRI target, and further refinements are needed to streamline LP scheduling post-MRI.</p><p>Future work will focus on sustaining these improvements, addressing logistical barriers, and exploring additional interventions to further optimize the investigation process for patients with papilledema.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Mollan SP, Davies B, Silver NC, <I>et al</I>. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: consensus guidelines on management. <I>Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery &amp; Psychiatry</I> 2018;<b>89</b>:1088&ndash;1100. Accessed in May2021 https://jnnp.bmj.com/content/89/10/1088</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aboueldahab, K., Ramkrishna, R., Aref, A., Zaman, T. M., Jones, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.48</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.48</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[48 Papillaedema pathway QIP]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A32</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A34</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A34-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[49 Reducing the alarm frequency of bedside monitors in the general ICU]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A34-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The Joint Commission (2024) emphasizes the need to reduce patient harm from clinical alarm systems. Excessive alarms can lead to desensitization among healthcare providers, increasing the risk of missed critical alerts. This issue is particularly concerning in ICUs, where nurses heavily rely on bedside physiological monitors for rapid decision-making.</p><p>At the beginning of data collection for this project, there were significant monthly variations in the occupancy of surgical beds. Therefore, data collection primarily focused on the <b>10 internal medicine beds</b> at the front station using the central monitoring system. A statistical analysis from January 1&ndash;31, 2023, identified 58,667 yellow alarms and 3,178 red alarms in a 10-bed general ICU, contributing to alarm fatigue and staff distress. Interviews with 28 nurses revealed that 85.7% found alarms overwhelming and exhausting, while 25 nurses lacked training on alarm management. Additionally, the unit lacked structured evaluation procedures for alarm settings.</p><p>To address these issues, a project team was established to reduce unnecessary alarms, improve alarm management awareness, and enhance nurse responsiveness to alarms, ultimately improving patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The project was implemented in a 20-bed general ICU, divided into two nursing stations: one for internal medicine (10 beds) and one for surgical patients (10 beds). Each bed was equipped with a bedside physiological monitor, connected to independent central monitoring systems at each station. The unit had 29 nursing staff, including 6 support personnel, with an average tenure of 3.6 years (excluding support staff).</p><p>Problem Identification (Root Cause Analysis)</p><p>The primary causes of excessive alarms were categorized as follows:</p><p>Personnel:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Lack of alarm awareness and training.</p></li><li><p>Support staff and new hires unfamiliar with response protocols.</p></li></l></p><p>Equipment:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Suboptimal alarm thresholds.</p></li><li><p>Alarms do not auto-reset when vitals normalize.</p></li><li><p>Some alarms inaudible due to ICU noise.</p></li></l></p><p>Environment:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Distance from central monitors delays responses.</p></li><li><p>Isolation room restrictions prevent timely access.</p></li><li><p>Excessive noise contributes to alarm fatigue.</p></li></l></p><p>Policies:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Lack of standardized protocols for alarm management.</p></li><li><p>No routine auditing of alarm response.</p></li><li><p>No dedicated training policies for new and support staff.</p></li></l></p><p>Intervention Strategies</p><p>Technical Adjustments:</p><p>Revised alarm threshold settings (HR: 50&ndash;120 bpm -&gt; 60&ndash;100 bpm, BP: 90&ndash;160 mmHg -&gt; 90&ndash;150 mmHg).</p><p>Enabled auto-reset for alarms after values normalize.</p><p>Environmental Modifications:</p><p>Installed remote alarm mute devices in isolation rooms.</p><p>Training &amp; Policy Implementation:</p><p>Developed bundled care checklist &amp; SOP for alarm settings.</p><p>Conducted monthly staff training and alarm response evaluations.</p><p>Implemented reward and penalty system for compliance.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Yellow Alarm Reduction: Achieved target rates from June to December 2023.</p><p>Red Alarm Challenges: September exceeded targets due to false alarms from high-frequency chest wall oscillation therapy.</p><p>Evaluation Compliance: Nurse performance on alarm settings met the &ge;90% goal except in December (due to newly hired staff).</p><p>Key Findings</p><p>The intervention successfully reduced unnecessary alarms, improved staff awareness, and enhanced nurse responsiveness.</p><p>Persistent Issue: Patients using high-frequency chest wall oscillation devices triggered false alarms for ventricular tachycardia, overwhelming nurses.</p><p>Future Recommendations:</p><p>AI-Driven Dynamic Alarm Systems: Adjust thresholds and frequencies based on real-time patient data.</p><p>Nurse-Engineer Collaboration: Aligns with Huo et al. (2023), supporting the development of personalized machine learning-based alarm management.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yu, Y.-J., Tai, Y.-J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.49</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.49</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[49 Reducing the alarm frequency of bedside monitors in the general ICU]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A34</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A34</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A34-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[50 Establish safety walk-around team to reduce inpatient fall at hospital public area]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A34-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Inpatient falls are common hospital adverse events leading to negative consequence to patient and hospital. The WHO has outlined a systems-approach to address falls, in which interventions are categorized into three domains: safer people, safer environments, and safer policies and legislation.<sup>1,2</sup> Data from Taiwan patient safety reporting system which showed that inpatient fall is the second common reported event. In our hospital, the most frequent inpatient falls sites were rehabilitation, oncology, and emergency department. Most falls occur at public area included toilet and hallway.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A safety walk-around team was established in 2022 to eliminate fall hazard at hospital public area in order to reduce inpatient falls. Team members including Chief executive officer of the Medical Quality and Patient Safety Committee, emergency physician, nurse head, rehabilitation therapy technician, and patient safety specialist.</p><p>The safety walk-around team focus to detect fall hazard every 4 months, starting from the most frequent fall event site of the hospital since 2022. The potential risk of fall hazard items were reported to hospital construction planning group for the environment improvement in order to prevent inpatient falls.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>During the two years of implement safety walk-around, we detected 8 dangerous environmental conditions and ameliorated 7 out of them. Environmental improvement including enlarged the gateway of toilet, eliminated the threshold of toilet, uncluttered the area of rehabilitation therapy area, smooth out the uneven walking surfaces, enhanced lighting of hallway, additional handrail of hallway and toilet, and posted highly visible warning sign notice were performed. The fall event in hospital pubic area was reduced from 5.9% to 2.9% (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>).</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 50 Figure 1</no><link locator="50_F1"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Dabkowski E, Cooper SJ, Duncan JR, Missen K. Exploring hospital inpatients&rsquo; awareness of their falls risk: a qualitative exploratory study. <I>Int J Environ Res Public Health</I> 2022 Dec 27;<b>20</b>(1):454. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010454.</p></li><li><p>Mikos M, Banas T, Czerw A, Banas B, Strz&amp;eogon;pek &amp;Lstrok;, Cury&amp;lstrok;o M. Hospital inpatient falls across clinical departments. <I>Int J Environ Res Public Health</I> 2021 Aug 2;<b>18</b>(15):8167. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158167.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ho, S.-W., Chen, C.-S., Chang, Y.-L., Shih, C.-M., Chao, T.-H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.50</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.50</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[50 Establish safety walk-around team to reduce inpatient fall at hospital public area]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A34</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A35</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A36-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[52 Increasing improvement training completion rates using QI methodology]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A36-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>In the context of healthcare, pressures to meet service demands along with inadequate staffing present challenges in getting staff to complete training courses. A quality improvement approach was used, including the IHI Model for Improvement and A3, to increase staff training completion rate for the Improvement Practitioner course at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A five-step method was used to provide a systematic way of identifying and addressing the problem of low training completion rate. The project was designed to use a time series testing strategy, comparing the baseline data before the change was introduced, with data collected over time to evaluate change ideas introduced for improvement. The result demonstrated sustained improvements using statistical process control charts.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The improvement project achievements included an increase in training completion rates from 54.1% to 80% and an increase of learner session satisfaction rating from 8.3 to 9.1 out of 10. Quality improvement offers a robust approach in addressing learning and development needs in healthcare and efficient utilisation of the Improvement Team&rsquo;s resources in creating a culture of continuous improvement at the Trust.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Klaber RE, Critchley RA. Taking an organisational approach to quality improvement. <I>Future Healthcare Journal</I> 2016;<b>3</b>(3):165&ndash;168.</p></li><li><p>Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Sanz-Vergel A. Job demands-resources theory: ten years later. <I>Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior</I> 2023;<b>10</b>(1):25&ndash;53.</p></li><li><p>Smith F, Alexandersson P, Bergman B, Vaughn L, Hellstro&#x0308;m A. Fourteen years of quality improvement education in healthcare: a utilisation-focused evaluation using concept mapping. <I>BMJ Open Quality</I> 2019;<b>8</b>(4).</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Choo, W., Klinkhamer, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.52</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.52</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[52 Increasing improvement training completion rates using QI methodology]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A36</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A36</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A36-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[53 Improving trainee competence in procedural skills for acute medicine: a closed-loop quality improvement project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A36-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Context</st><p>This work was conducted in Acute Medicine, Stoke Mandeville Hospital (SMH), Buckinghamshire Health NHS Trust, UK. The work focused on clinical skills training of non-Consultant grade trainees (including registrars, core trainees, foundation doctors, physicianassociates, and advanced clinical practitioners). The patient group impacted by this workincludes all patients admitted to the medical take requiring timely diagnostic and therapeuticprocedures.</p></sec><sec><st>Problem</st><p>Non-Consultant grade acute medicine trainees are expected to become proficient at time-critical procedures; however, many acute medicine trainees do not possess the necessary competence at clinical skills. This problem impacts on patient safety and causes unnecessary delays in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.</p></sec><sec><st>Assessment of Problem and Analysis of Its Causes</st><p>A survey of acute medicine trainees was conducted. This consisted of four questions, for each domain of Miller&rsquo;s pyramid of competence, in relation to performing lumbar puncture and chest drains:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Awareness: How confident are you about the indications for the procedure?</p></li><li><p>Knows How: How confident are you about the steps involved to perform the procedure?</p></li><li><p>Shows How: How confident are you at performing the procedure on a manakin?</p></li><li><p>Does: How confident are you at performing the procedure on a patient?</p></li></l></p><p>The pre-intervention survey of self-assessed trainee confidence revealed that scores for Awareness, Knows How, Shows How, and Does were 61.7%, 35.6%, 28.3%, and 27.0%, respectively.</p><p>Furthermore, only 30% of trainees had previously received simulation training at SMH and 60% of trainees were not competent to perform a lumbar puncture independently.</p></sec><sec><st>Intervention</st><p>A plan for change was developed in discussion of the problem with the Consultant Lead for Acute Medicine. The aim of the intervention was to improve trainee competence at performing clinical skills and therefore improve patient care by increasing patient safety and mitigating delays in performance these tasks. The intervention consisted of a trial of simulation-based clinical skills teaching sessions covering lumbar puncture and chest drains.</p></sec><sec><st>Strategy for Change</st><p>The intervention was administered by changing the format of an established weekly Acute Medicine Teaching Programme. This teaching programme, which previously consisted of lecture-based teaching sessions, was changed to include simulation-based clinical skills teaching, covering lumbar puncture and chest drains.</p><p>The simulation-based teaching sessions were comprised of a 30 min PowerPoint tutorial on the theoretical elements of the clinical skill, followed by 60 min demonstration and trainee practice using clinical equipment and manakins, with constructive feedback and reflective work-place based assessments signed-off by the session facilitators.</p></sec><sec><st>Measurement of Improvement</st><p>After the simulation-based teaching sessions, a post-intervention survey of acute medicine trainee competence was conducted. This consisted of the same four questions used to assess trainee competence pre-intervention.</p><p>Results from the post-intervention survey suggested that self-assessed trainee confidence at knowing the indications for performing the procedure, knowing the steps involved in performing the procedure, feeling competent at performing the procedure on a manakin, and feeling confident at performing the procedure on a patient was rated at 92.8%, 83.0%, 86.2%, and72.7%, respectively.</p></sec><sec><st>Effects of Changes</st><p>Implementation of simulation-based teaching resulted in significant increases in trainee competence (self-rated confidence) across all four domains of Miller&rsquo;s pyramid of competence:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Awareness: +30.0% (95% CI 18.5% to 41.5%; P=0.0011)</p></li><li><p>Knows How: +43.3% (95% CI 27.5% to 59.1%; P=0.0009)</p></li><li><p>Shows How: +56.7% (95% CI 48.1% to 65.2%; P&lt;0.0001)</p></li><li><p>Does: +43.3% (95% CI 27.5% to 59.1%; P=0.0009)</p></li></l></p><p>These results suggest simulation-based teaching produced a dramatic improvement in trainee competence. Continuation and expansion of simulation-based teaching may improve timely delivery of these skills. Problems encountered included departmental clinical pressures which reduce attendance of faculty and trainees at teaching sessions.</p></sec><sec><st>Lessons Learned</st><p>The problem of ensuring timely delivery of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures is exacerbated by low levels of competence in procedural skill among acute medicine trainees. With the support of a Lead Consultant, this problem can be managed through the adoption of simulation-based teaching into established departmental teaching programmes and expanded to cover a wide range of clinical skills, including lumbar puncture, chest drains, vascular access, POCUS, etc.</p><p>Given the opportunity to start this project again, the impact of a wider array of simulation sessions covering a greater number of clinical skills would have been assessed.</p></sec><sec><st>Messages for Others</st><p>The permanent integration of weekly simulation-based teaching for acute medicine trainees may improve patient safety and reduce unnecessary delays in the performance of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.</p><p>By adapting current acute medicine teaching programmes, this may result in better patient outcomes, without placing additional strain on limited resources.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hillyar, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.53</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.53</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[53 Improving trainee competence in procedural skills for acute medicine: a closed-loop quality improvement project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A36</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A37</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A41-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[58 Using the human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) to improve the safety of emergency medication in isolation wards]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A41-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>According to the annual report statistics of the Taiwan Patient Safety Reporting system (TPR) of the Medical Policy Council, in the past five years, from 2018 to 2022, drug incident notifications accounted for the highest proportion of overall incident categories, the proportion of severe incidents has decreased year by year from 15.9% in 2005 to 1.5% in 2022.</p><p>By encouraging safety incident reporting, hospitals can conduct risk management early through case studies and take necessary measures to prevent and reduce patient accidents or injuries.</p><p>Center for Quality Management nurse received a notification of a drug incident in November 2023. Patients in the isolation ward were pre-installed with endotracheal tubes. The nurse prepared the pre-intubation induction drug Ketalar 50 mg IV according to the doctor&rsquo;s instructions. When taking the medicine, she mistakenly regarded 50 mg/ml as one bottle of 50 mg. Therefore, all 10 ml of the drug (500 mg in total) was extracted and injected.</p><p>The attending physician was immediately notified. The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit for continued treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We immediately set up establish RCA investigation team. It was confirmed that the problems by the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) were as follows<sup>1 3</sup>: 1. The labeling on the drug box is misleading; 2. Verification the medical orders and medicine preparation were not done by the same person, and there was a gap in the complete information; 3. Precautions for the use of commonly used pre-intubation medicines were not updated.</p><p>We implemented improvement based on root causes:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Proactively prompt the total amount of medicine bottles:Pharmacist put a reminder slogan &lsquo;One bottle contains 500 mg&rsquo; on the medicine box starting November 2023.</p></li><li><p>In December 2023, a simulated scenario drill for emergency medicine preparation in the isolation ward will be conducted: (1) Confirm the medication preparation process in the isolation ward, check the doctor&rsquo;s order in the nursing E-car and complete the medicine withdrawal, to avoid interference in emergency situations and the occurrence of medicine preparation errors. (2) It is emphasized that the preparation of medicines must be checked, and if there are any doubts about the medicines handed over, one must reply again to confirm (check back).</p></li><li><p>Update of commonly used pre-intubation drugs:(1)The ward director and head nurse conducted case discussions at ward meetings and introduced reading reports on common sedative drugs for emergency intubation in October 2023. (2)Post the pre-intubation anesthesia and sedation drug chart (including drug name, common dosage, effects, etc.) on the emergency vehicle.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>For this improvement project, Center for Quality Management has been continuously tracking the effectiveness of the implementation of the improvement measures for up to one year. The ward director and head nurse jointly held ward meetings to discuss cases, with a participation rate of 90.9%. By the head nurse and quality control team leader audit each nurse&rsquo;s medication operating standards compliance rate 100%. Up to now, there have been no safety incidents similar to emergency administration occurred in this unit.</p><p>IMSN (International Medication Safety Network) proposes that individual attention and alertness cannot be relied upon to reduce the occurrence of medication errors. Barriers must be set up, and human factors principles can be included in system or process design.<sup>2</sup> In this project, medication extraction and medication administration are checked by using a team-based communication method to improve the administration safety during the emergency process, in the future, it may be possible to consider keeping emergency drugs in a ready-to-use state as much as possible.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>HFACS (2016). Human Factors Analysis and Classification System, HFACS, Inc..</p></li><li><p>IMSN(2019). Global Targeted Medication Safety Best Practices.</p></li><li><p>Sheng-Hui HunZ. (2020). Implementation Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Tool for Adverse Events Root Cause Analysis (Doctoral thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan). Retrived from https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU202001403</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hsieh, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.58</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.58</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[58 Using the human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) to improve the safety of emergency medication in isolation wards]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A41</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A41</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A41-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[59 Performance evaluation of rotor-gene Q EBV quant assay]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A41-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) is a common virus that poses significant risks for immunocompromised patients, especially those who have undergone organ transplantation. Latent EBV infection can lead to Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorders (PTLD), a major cause of morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients. Timely detection of EBV viral load is crucial for the early management of EBV-related PTLD.</p><p>Currently, EBV viral load testing is outsourced to the central hospital, which results in a delay of approximately one week from sample collection to report delivery due to shipping and scheduling constraints. This delay may hinder timely treatment. This study aims to establish an in-house testing platform at Hsinchu Branch of National Taiwan University Hospital, using the Rotor-Gene Q system, to replace outsourced testing and reduce the waiting time for clinical reports.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This study compares the EBV viral load test results obtained using the Rotor-Gene Q system at the Hsinchu Branch with those obtained using the Abbott m2000 system at the main hospital. A series of tests were conducted on clinical samples to assess sensitivity, precision, specificity, and repeatability. Additionally, qualitative results from both systems were compared.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The Rotor-Gene Q system demonstrated higher sensitivity, being able to detect lower concentrations of the virus compared to the Abbott m2000 system. The system also exhibited excellent precision and repeatability, with consistent results both within the same batch and on different testing days. The Rotor-Gene Q system also showed high specificity, accurately identifying negative samples without cross-reactivity. Comparison of methods revealed that the qualitative result concordance between the two systems exceeded 90%, indicating that the Rotor-Gene Q system provides reliable diagnostic information.</p><p>This study demonstrates that the Rotor-Gene Q system provides higher sensitivity and reliability in EBV viral load testing compared to the Abbott m2000 system, significantly improving clinical diagnostic and treatment efficiency. Based on these findings, this study recommends the introduction of the Rotor-Gene Q system at Hsinchu Branch of National Taiwan University Hospital to replace outsourced testing, thereby reducing patient report waiting times, enhancing clinical efficiency, and enabling timely treatment.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lin, C.-Y., Kong, L.-Y., Chang, C.-W., Wei, C.-H., Shao, P.-L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.59</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.59</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[59 Performance evaluation of rotor-gene Q EBV quant assay]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A41</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A42</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A45-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[62 Using combined care to reduce catheter infection rates in cardiovascular intensive care units]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A45-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Hospital-acquired infections are a serious issue that affects not only healthcare personnel and patients but also the efficiency and cost of the entire healthcare system. In our ICU, we observed a significant increase in the number of hospital-acquired infections from January to March 2024, which raised considerable concern and warranted urgent attention.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>After careful investigation and analysis, we found that the primary cause of hospital-acquired infections was the improper implementation of protective measures by healthcare personnel after contact with patients and the hospital environment, leading to cross-infection. This not only increased the workload of healthcare staff but also extended patients&lsquo; hospital stays and raised medical costs. Therefore, it was imperative to take effective measures to reduce the incidence of hospital-acquired infections.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We developed a series of improvement measures and project objectives. First, we strengthened the promotion of isolation measures and protective practices through morning meetings and in-service education, providing demonstrations to heighten healthcare personnel&rsquo;s awareness. Isolation warning signs were placed outside the wards, and dedicated contaminated clothing bins were set up inside to ensure proper disposal of contaminated items. Hand hygiene posters were also posted above the washbasins in the wards, reminding everyone entering the ward to observe hand hygiene. The implementation of these measures significantly improved the thoroughness of isolation practices, thus achieving the goal of reducing the infection rate.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Through our efforts and the implementation of improvement measures, the incidence of hospital-acquired infections was significantly reduced, enhancing the quality of care and alleviating the burden on both healthcare staff and patients. However, we recognize that this is only the first step in solving the problem, and continuous efforts and improvements are needed to ensure effective control and prevention of hospital-acquired infections. In the future, we will further strengthen training and education on isolation measures and protective practices, as well as increase supervision and audits of healthcare personnel to ensure effective implementation of these measures. Additionally, we will continue to keep abreast of the latest medical research and technological advancements and promptly adjust our protective measures and policies to address the ever-changing risks of hospital-acquired infections.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, Y. Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.62</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.62</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[62 Using combined care to reduce catheter infection rates in cardiovascular intensive care units]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A45</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A45</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A45-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[63 Improving the efficiency of fracture inpatient waiting list reports]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A45-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The Royal Victoria Hospital is the regional trauma centre in Northern Ireland, and one of the largest trauma (i.e. fracture) departments in the United Kingdom.</p><p>The fracture department&rsquo;s trauma co-ordinators arrange the allocation of urgent and emergency patients to suitable fracture operating lists, based on a complex spreadsheet of inpatient information.</p><p>Up to three times per day, the co-ordinators provide reports to managers detailing the numbers and status of pre-operative patients, allowing prompt reallocation of resources to meet urgent surgical needs. To optimise bed availability and minimise surgical delays, these reports categorise patients based on location, type of surgery, readiness for surgery, or reasons why patients may not be ready for surgery.</p><p>Manually counting information from a complex spreadsheet, often requiring lengthy clarification, was time-consuming and interfering with the co-ordinators&rsquo; other crucial roles such as arranging operative lists, and causing frustration among co-ordinators and managers.</p><p>The primary aim was to reduce the time taken by the co-ordinators to compile and clarify fracture inpatient waiting list reports by 20% within one year (April 2022 to March 2023). The secondary aim was to improve staff satisfaction with the speed of availability and clarity of these reports.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Time taken by co-ordinators to compile and clarify each report was recorded and shown in a Shewhart chart i.e. i-chart. Questionnaires assessed stakeholders&rsquo; opinions on the system&rsquo;s efficiency, reliability and ease of use.</p><p>Quality improvement methodology was used to identify and address challenges and possible solutions. Three key challenges were identified and addressed with the following change ideas and associated PDSA (plan-do-study-act) cycles, with regular meetings, verbal updates/feedback, and questionnaires.</p><p><l type="letterupper"><li><p>Lack of agreed definitions of patient categories (e.g. type of surgery needed and reasons for readiness for surgery or otherwise), to be addressed by developing operational definitions (PDSA 1).</p></li><li><p>Lack of electronic devices for updating patient information, addressed with the provision of portable electronic devices (tablet in PDSA 2 and laptop in PDSA 5).</p></li><li><p>Lack of categorisation of the type of surgery needed and reasons for readiness for surgery or otherwise, addressed by amending the co-ordinators&rsquo; spreadsheet to include this data, with or without automatic collation (PDSA 3, 4 and 6).</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Change ideas addressing all three areas for improvement were successfully implemented in PDSA 1 (clarification of operational definitions), PDSA 5 (introduction of laptop computers) and 6 (addition of two new categorisation columns in the co-ordinators&rsquo; spreadsheet).</p><p>PDSA cycles 2, 3, and 4 were adapted or abandoned due to technical challenges, tailoring changes to the team members&rsquo; requirements.</p><p>The use of tablets in PDSA 2 was abandoned due to software incompatibility, the use of five automated spreadsheet columns (vlookup function) in PDSA 3 was simplified to become PDSA 6, and the use of pivot tables to automatically collate patient data in PDSA 4 abandoned as too complex.</p><p>Subsequently, the new mean was reduced from a baseline of 22.4 minutes per report to 13.8 minutes per report, i.e. 40% reduction in time taken.</p><p>Questionnaires reported improved staff satisfaction, changing from most responses being &lsquo;dissatisfied&rsquo; or &lsquo;very dissatisfied&rsquo; to most being &lsquo;neutral&rsquo;, &lsquo;satisfied&rsquo; or &lsquo;very satisfied&rsquo;.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The primary and secondary aims were achieved, with reduced time taken for reports, and improved staff satisfaction from co-ordinators and managers.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig, J., Diver, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.63</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.63</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[63 Improving the efficiency of fracture inpatient waiting list reports]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A45</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A46</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A51-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[68 Opening minds and hearts while opening doors - unlocking limitless possibilities to drive unprecedented results through medical staff cultural transformation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A51-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Heavily matrixed healthcare systems face a challenge of coordinating care across the continuum, enabling the provision of timely access to services, while maintaining and optimizing system-wide objectives. Processes that support these are disconnected, cumbersome, and tedious. Patient needs are largely unique, and the identified as well as potential services required are not always clear <I>a priori</I>.</p><p>Hospital workflows tend to be siloed or closed, and their evolution has not matured with the rapidly changing medical, regulatory, and service environments. Despite technological advances, there is often segmentation across the operational spectrum which perpetuates siloed care.</p><p>The Patient Transfer Center (PTC) provides a centralized service acting as a doorway to our hospitals. This is an interestingly unique service that advocates for patient needs, ensuring that the quality of care, use of hospital resources, and business growth are well aligned. Key factors for success are being able to serve the most patients possible, responding rapidly with an anticipated yet well-structured care plan for each case while increasing capacity utilization to optimal levels.</p><p>The team identifies and evaluates multiple facets for each transfer, such as patient need, clinical evaluation, level of care, and matches that with available resources and locations using decision trees and real time data. This uses multiple tools spanning people, process and technology, to identify the best possible service and care plan from the initial request.</p><p>The team works with over 350 hospitals in the California service area and is highly regarded as a go-to for many service providers as a single point of contact, and for service quality. In a short period of time, it has matured to become the backbone of the organization.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>At one of the 17 hospitals that the PTC currently supports, before the new Chief Medical Officer undertook this process of transformation, operations were fragmented, and the medical staff was isolated from other system hospitals. Physicians rarely took calls for transfers, beds were erratically flagged as unavailable, visibility of time-based services and specialties were limited, and lacked an overall <I>esprit de corps</I>.</p><p>As a first step we engaged with leadership that are mission driven and held compassion and commitment in high regard. Ideas and discussions on operational policy and goals were identified and refined with a focus on improving quality of care. Fundamental elements of care are capability and capacity.</p><p>An improved operational service was designed and developed, using a case-based review model. Discussions with hospital leaders were driven using data analyses, surfacing process and workflow challenges and identifying opportunities for improvement using a shared responsibility approach. We placed a strong emphasis on reinforcing positive attitudes and compassionate behavior. This, coupled with collaboration from CMOs and engaged physicians created a sense of shared ownership and an &lsquo;always yes&rsquo; mindset.</p><p>From first contact through patient arrival, the PTC is the patient&rsquo;s advocate, centralizing capability and capacity decisions across multiple services. Each incoming transfer is analyzed as a virtual flow/treatment plan from pre-admission to discharge. This is much more than just connecting with care providers and includes time-based availability of hospital resources, relationships with external entities such as transportation, insurance, and care escalations based on expertise and experience. Many decision-making teams are engaged through technology or through vetted, standardized processes to provide input and raise concerns before a patient acceptance decision is rendered.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Entrenched cultural attitudes, siloed mindsets and behaviors, from both an organizational and individual perspective, can be significant barriers to growth. Courageous leadership requires not just the vision and resilience to overcome these challenges, but also the self-awareness to continually look at ourselves from different perspectives, the relentlessness to remain laser-focused on the bigger picture, and the commitment to address issues that require change with respect, empathy and patience.</p><p>Opening our minds to change, using compassion as our compass and walking through the sometimes-closed doors within the hospital has shown us how to work better as connected teams towards a shared vision. CMOs and physicians&rsquo; buy-in to embrace a culture of &lsquo;always yes&rsquo; to accepting patient transfer requests was foundational to the early and sustained success of the model at this hospital.</p><p>Leveraging technology to gain efficiency, automation and access to information has been essential. It has helped integrate disparate systems and enable fast decision-making at all levels. Operationally, we publish dashboards with KPIs that are available and used across all levels in the organization.</p><p>The PTC has driven transformational change throughout the organization. For example, for Providence Saint Joseph hospital in Burbank, California, as a direct result of collaboration between CMO and PTC we saw a 71% growth in transfer requests and a corresponding 127% increase in transfer acceptance from 2022 to 2023.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Agrawal, J., Laurent, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.68</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.68</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[68 Opening minds and hearts while opening doors - unlocking limitless possibilities to drive unprecedented results through medical staff cultural transformation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A51</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A51</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A51-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[69 Timely urinary catheter change in rehabilitation medicine]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A51-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Timely catheter changes are crucial for reducing the risk of infection and preventing patient readmissions. The EPIC3 guidelines, Loveday et al. (2014)<sup>1</sup> provide national evidence-based recommendations for preventing healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) in NHS hospitals, emphasizing the importance of best practices in catheter care to minimize infection risks. A rapid review revealed that for one-third of patients at the Oxford Centre of Enablement, the date of the last catheter change was either unknown or not documented in the Electronic Patient Record (EPR). Even when dates were recorded, catheters were not always replaced within the recommended time frame, increasing the risk of infection and subsequent readmission.</p><p>The primary aim of this quality improvement project was to ensure that the date of the last catheter change was consistently documented in the EPR for all patients admitted to the Oxford Centre of Enablement starting from August 2023. The specific measure chosen was the presence of a documented catheter change date in the EPR.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>Several interventions were considered to achieve this aim, including creating reminders within the EPR, issuing verbal prompts to document the change, adding reminders to handover sheets, and sending regular email reminders to staff. These change ideas were tested and refined through multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles, involving collaboration with bladder and bowel nurse specialists, ward managers and IT support to address identified barriers and improve the process. In the end, it became clear that we needed to fix recording the date of catheter change in order to make it easier to change the catheter when indicated.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The interventions led to a significant improvement in the accuracy and timeliness of catheter change documentation. This was evidenced by 10 consecutive data points showing the catheter change was consistently and reliably documented for all patients compared to just over 1 in 2 during the baseline data collection period, indicating sustained improvement in the documentation practices.</p><p>This project demonstrated that targeted, simple interventions could lead to meaningful improvements in healthcare practices. Engaging frontline staff in the change process, addressing barriers collaboratively, and using iterative testing were critical to the project&rsquo;s success. Consistent documentation in the EPR not only enhanced patient safety by reducing infection risks but also contributed to a decrease in potential readmissions.</p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Loveday HP, <I>et al</I>. EPIC3: national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England. <I>Journal of Hospital Infection</I> 2014;<b>86</b>:S1&ndash;S70.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Knight, H. M., Lacson, M., Leyose, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.69</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.69</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[69 Timely urinary catheter change in rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A51</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A52</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A52-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[70 Improving the patient experience in a general surgery residency program]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A52-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Patient safety, patient satisfaction, and continuity of care are essential aspects of good healthcare. Residents in training have the potential to be the moving force in delivering high-quality patient care. In the USA, ACGME (the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education) promotes resident education and participation in quality improvement initiatives for better patient experience and outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Our department is set in a teaching community hospital, serving a diverse population. We created a 3-steps program to engage the residents in building robust communication with patients to improve continuity, patient satisfaction, and patient safety.</p><p>  <b># 1 _ SURG IN</b>  </p><p>  <b>S</b>urgical Diagnosis</p><p>  <b>U</b>nderstanding treatment plan</p><p>  <b>R</b>eadiness for Discharge</p><p>  <b>G</b>athering the day&rsquo;s information</p><p>  <b>I</b>nput from patient</p><p>  <b>N</b>urse input</p><p>Daily evening rounds led by the surgery resident on-call team, the charge nurse and the patient. In an interactive format, these rounds without the hustle and bustle of the day, are built around clear communication about diagnosis, tests results and plans allowing all to be on the same page.</p><p>  <b>#2- DISCHARGE CHECK LIST</b>  </p><p>A one-page summarized document, which is reviewed by the resident, the nurse and patient at time of discharge. It includes the Diagnosis, Procedures performed, attending surgeon of record, medications, wound care instructions, follow-up place with date and a direct number to the resident lounge to call for any issues.</p><p>This easy access to the surgery team always, and offering precise information, alleviates patients&rsquo; concerns, potentially decreasing unnecessary ED visits.</p><p>  <b>#3-POST DISCHARGE PHONE CALLS</b>  </p><p>Our patients receive a phone call from the surgery residents 1&ndash;2 days after discharge. A scripted list of questions is asked addressing wound status, pain level, medications filled, follow-up appointment scheduling, and satisfaction of care in the hospital, additional questions and comments patients are encouraged. We feel that being contacted by a member of the surgical team, whom they interacted with during their stay adds a unique personal touch.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Anonymous surveys done on the surgery team and the nursing staff revealed satisfaction in this process. They felt that the &lsquo;extra&rsquo; time spent, likely improved efficiency, and unnecessary ED visits and admissions in the long run.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>This 3-steps project using a PDSA cycle of PI reveals that a simple and small-scale efficient process can improve patient safety, patient satisfaction, and surgical resident participation in continuity of care. For patients and their families, the experience of better communication implies that providers know them well, do care, and agree on a unified management plan that involves them and will remain committed to them for care in the future.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mandava, N., Louis, M., Alapati, A., Tian, J., Bathia, S., Mourad, Y., Fernandez, J., Giannis, D., Hassanesfahani, M., Alla, M., Bodden, C., Griner, S., Lopez, J., Martin, A., Wong, C., Marfo, N., Stone, J., Kilada, C., Kaur, M., Liu, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.70</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.70</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[70 Improving the patient experience in a general surgery residency program]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A52</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A52</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A52-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[71 Assessing psychological safety during visitations: a literature review and measuring tool]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A52-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>This research was conducted as part of a master&rsquo;s thesis in &lsquo;Medical Biology&rsquo; with a specialisation in &lsquo;Science, Management and Innovation&rsquo; at Radboud University. The research was done with Qualicura, a company dedicated to improving the quality of specialist healthcare in the Netherlands partly by offering support during quality visitations.</p><p>Quality visitations, or visitations, are formal investigations into the practices of medical professional teams of departments in a hospital. These medical professionals are associated with a medical association that ensure the established guidelines for quality of care and quality improvement are met through visitations. Visitations take place once every five years and are performed by a visitation committee, made up of members from the same medical association.</p><p>To ensure visitation reports effectively evaluate the quality of care, they must reflect the average functioning of a department. This can only be done if medical professionals actively and honestly engage in the visitation. A culture of fear and silence must be avoided, and medical professionals should be ensured that speaking up cannot cause negative consequences. Research indicates that psychological safety is essential for quality improvement, yet this factor remains unexamined in the context of visitations. This research developed a post-visitation questionnaire that measures the psychological safety climate during a visitation. This allows the visitation committee and the visitation advisor from Qualicura to contextualise the visitation.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A narrative literature review provided information regarding psychological safety, its outcomes and how they relate to visitations.</p><p>Next, a questionnaire tool was developed with visitation advisors from Qualicura to measure the psychological safety climate on a visitation day. A modified RAND Delphi method including four rounds was used to develop two validated questionnaires for measuring psychological safety during visitations: for the medical professional team and the visitation committee.</p><p>Lastly, a pilot study was conducted to evaluate the quality and feasibility of the two developed questionnaires. The pilot study measured the psychological safety of both the medical professional teams and the visitation committees, during fifteen visitations spread over four different medical associations. The response rate of the pilot study was 44% (20 out of 45 participants) for the visitation committees and 24% (25 out of 105 participants) for the medical teams. This prevented meaningful statistical analysis. Item relationships were not established and no factor model was derived.</p><p>The visitation experts, medical associations, visitation committees and medical professional teams were contacted via email through Qualicura, ensuring anonymity towards the researcher.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>This research underscores the critical role of psychological safety in healthcare quality improvement. It provides an overview of the current knowledge on psychological safety, which can be used to make visitation experts and visitation committees aware of its importance along with the benefits a psychologically safe visitation environment poses. Benefits include higher show of team learning behaviours (Cheng et al., 2012; Edmondson, 1999; Miao et al., 2020; Weiss et al., 2023), more engagement (Cheng et al., 2012), creativity, and innovation of medical professional teams (Jin et al., 2022; Miao et al., 2020), higher level of trust and respect (Carmeli &amp; Gittell, 2008; Edmondson, 1999; Edmondson &amp; Bransby, 2023; Rivera et al., 2020; Shockley-Zalabak et al., 2000; Singh &amp; Winkel, 2011) towards all visitation participants and more receptiveness for recommendations towards the medical team.</p><p>Results of the pilot test indicate a dissonance in perceptions of the psychological safety climate between the visitation committee and the medical professional teams. This dissonance could undermine the earlier mentioned benefits of a psychologically safe visitation environment.</p><p>After further validation, the developed questionnaires could be used to evaluate the psychological safety climates of all Qualicura&rsquo;s future visitations. As the focus within healthcare shifts from direct innovation to quality enhancement, psychological safety will become central to improving healthcare. This study aims to increase awareness and stimulate further research towards psychological safety.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[AS (Chana) van der Heijden]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.71</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.71</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[71 Assessing psychological safety during visitations: a literature review and measuring tool]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A52</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A53</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A54-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[73 Development and implementation of a quality management system in a university medical center]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A54-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>An hospital organization operates in a dynamic environment and has to deal with internal and external factors. To provide good quality and efficient and effective care, continuous quality improvement is essential. <sup>1 2</sup> Continuous improvement, based on the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDSA) cycle of Deming, is needed to assure continuity of the organization.</p><p>In our hospital, several different systems e.g. document management system (2013) and incident reporting form (2015) were used to collect data from different sources. However, there was a lack of overview of which hospital-wide quality improvement projects were being undertaken. Improvement measures were not properly followed up, resulting in a lack of implementation hospital-wide. The goal of this project was to develop an integrated quality management system hospital-wide which could be used to both identify improvement measures and ensure that the PDSA cycle was completed.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>To realize structure, coherence and easy accessibility of information, a quality management system (QMS) was implemented to identify potential improvement measures originating from various sources e.g., incident reporting, registration of complaints by patients, results of audits, sentinel events. A project group was established, included professionals with extensive experience in relevant areas, such as nurses and complaint officers. The focus was on further implementation of different sources and to evaluate the document management system, incident reporting form and follow-up improvement measures.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The QMS was extended with a follow-up improvement measures (2019), patient complaint reporting (2023), and internal audit reporting (2024) to bring improvement measures and signals together. The incident reporting form and the form for registration of follow-up improvement measures were optimized in 2023 and reimplemented. The integrated dashboards in the QMS reduced the need for manual compilation of results at both central and departmental levels and ensures that the PDSA cycle is completed. The six-month post-implementation evaluation of adapted incident reporting form and follow-up improvement measures showed that the changes were well integrated into day-to-day practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>A hospital-wide overview of various sources is available which provides information required to identify hospital-wide improvement potential and can support management at all levels. A single QMS provide overall insight and prevent departments from working on their own and from &lsquo;reinventing the wheel&rsquo;. The next step is to incorporate a risk management tool to incorporate signals form other sources but which can also be applied to reduce risks.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Jonker E, Koopman C, van der Nagel N, Schoorl M. An integrated quality management system for healthcare. <I>The Open Medicine Journal</I> 2017;<b>4</b>(1).</p></li><li><p>Claessens F, Castro EM, Seys D, Brouwers J, Van Wilder A, Jans A, Vanhaecht K. Sustainable quality management in hospitals: The experiences of healthcare quality managers. <I>Health Services Management Research</I> 2025;<b>38</b>(1):50&ndash;57.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[IJzendoorn, M., Haenen-Zijlmans, A., Brunsveld Reinders, A. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.73</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.73</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[73 Development and implementation of a quality management system in a university medical center]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A54</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A54</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A54-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[74 Blood-curdling safe: safety-II FRAM analysis education on anticoagulants]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A54-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Medication safety, particularly in the management of anticoagulation therapy, remains a persistent challenge in healthcare, with frequent medication errors leading to adverse patient outcomes. Traditional safety approaches (Safety-I) focus on identifying and eliminating errors, whereas the Safety-II perspective emphasizes learning from everyday clinical practice, recognizing how successful outcomes are achieved despite system complexity. This project integrates Safety-II principles into medical education, utilizing the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) to align &lsquo;Work-as-Imagined&rsquo; (WAI) with &lsquo;Work-as-Done&rsquo; (WAD). By embedding this innovative approach in the curriculum, we aim to foster a proactive patient safety mindset among future physicians.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A structured educational program was implemented within the medical master&rsquo;s curriculum at Erasmus MC, consisting of:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>  <b>E-learning Module</b> &ndash; Introducing Safety-I and Safety-II principles, with interactive content and quizzes.</p></li><li><p>  <b>Case-Based Learning</b> &ndash; Students construct FRAM models based on anticoagulation case scenarios, emphasizing variability in clinical practice.</p></li><li><p>  <b>Clerkship Observations</b> &ndash; During their clerkship, students compare real-world medication management with their initial FRAM models in mind, allowing them to witness the process in practice, identify discrepancies, and recognize resilience strategies</p></li><li><p>  <b>Reflective Learning Sessions</b> &ndash; Post-clerkship discussions enable students to share insights and refine their understanding of safety concepts.</p></li></l></p><p>This action research study involved six iterative learning cycles, with continuous refinement based on student feedback.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Over 500 students participated, generating 64 WAI FRAM models. Learning analytics indicated high student engagement, with improved understanding of medication safety principles. Qualitative feedback highlighted an increased appreciation for resilience in clinical practice, with students demonstrating a shift towards Safety-II thinking. Initial challenges included resistance to abstract concepts, which were addressed by refining case studies to be more clinically relevant.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Integrating Safety-II and FRAM into medical education enhances students&rsquo; ability to critically assess and improve medication safety practices. By shifting focus from error avoidance to system resilience, this approach equips future healthcare professionals with a balanced, proactive perspective on patient safety. The developed educational framework is scalable and adaptable, offering potential for broader implementation across healthcare disciplines. Future research will explore long-term impacts on clinical practice and patient outcomes.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baidjoe, L., Dijk, L. v., Jans-Simoons, M., Tran, A., Kruip, M., Versmissen, J., Rosse, F. v.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.74</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.74</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[74 Blood-curdling safe: safety-II FRAM analysis education on anticoagulants]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A54</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A55</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A55-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[75 Efficacy of a customised education-based intervention to increase awareness of the Just culture philosophy within a primary care setting]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A55-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>To deliver quality improvement in healthcare settings, Institute of Healthcare Improvement (IHI) has advocated for Just Culture frameworks to facilitate effective incident reporting and analysis. Just Culture promotes a systems focused approach to errors at an organization level. Adverse events were used as an opportunity for learning and improvement, thereby encouraging transparency and accountability. However, the fear of blame and legal consequences<sup>1</sup> may impede its adoption by staff.</p><p>Existing research papers have largely been conceptual in nature, outlining the principles of Just Culture. <sup>2,3</sup> Most Just culture programmes were implemented directly by leadership of the healthcare organizations. In public-private partnership where private medical service providers are contracted to deliver medical services for the Authority, lapse in knowledge of the Authority&rsquo;s governance framework, disconnect between expectation of Authority&rsquo;s quality assurance team and contractor&rsquo;s staff, as well as hesitancy of contractor staff in reporting near misses and adverse events are additional challenges to overcome. This quality improvement project aims to evaluate the efficacy of a customized education programme on improving Just-Culture knowledge and attitude in the setting of Contracted Primary Care Medical Service Providers across several medical centres. The customized education programme included philosophy and application of Just Culture, addressing staff&rsquo;s knowledge of Just Culture and clinical governance framework.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Support from leadership of the private medical service providers was sought for the Just Culture improvement project by the Authority&rsquo;s Clinical Governance group. A patient safety culture (PSC) survey (n=33) was administered to evaluate the medical staff&rsquo;s attitude and perspective in open and transparent reporting of near misses and adverse events. Based on results of the PSC survey, an education-based programme was developed to cover Just culture, reporting frameworks, and Root Cause Analysis methodology, customised using interactive case studies for problem-based learning. The PSC survey (n=25) was readministered 2 weeks after the intervention. Statistical analysis was done using Fisher&rsquo;s Exact Test.</p><p>A knowledge-based questionnaire (n=44) was administered before and after intervention to assess the knowledge of Just Culture and skills for conducting of Root Cause Analysis (RCA) for quality improvement. Statistical analysis was done using the Wilcoxon Man Whitney U test.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Results showed that the customised education-based teaching session significantly improved the participants&rsquo; understanding of Just Culture and technique of RCAs, p&lt;0.001, (n=44)</p><p>There was significant improvement (OR=10.0; 95% CI: 1.18&ndash;84.6; p=0.017) in the intent of participants to report all incident types, reflecting an improvement in attitude regarding incident reporting.</p><p>The customised education-based intervention was effective in promoting Just Culture among primary care healthcare staff in a public-private partnership. Further evaluation is necessary to assess the sustainability of these interventions on incident reporting and quality improvement outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Dekker S. (2012). Just culture balancing safety and accountability Sidney Dekker. CRC Press.</p></li><li><p>Marx DA. (2017, January 9). Patient Safety and the &lsquo;Just Culture&rsquo;: A Primer for Health Care Executives. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/patient-safety-and-just-culture-primer-health-care-executives</p></li><li><p>Reason JT. (2008). The human contribution: Unsafe acts, accidents and heroic recoveries. Ashgate.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koh, O., Sayampanathan, A. A., Yi, O. X., Jiaming, L., Arulanandam, S., Ing, H. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.75</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.75</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[75 Efficacy of a customised education-based intervention to increase awareness of the Just culture philosophy within a primary care setting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A55</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A55</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A55-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[76 Safety checks save lives]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A55-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Ensuring the safety of patients on suicide precaution involves regular monitoring, providing mental health support, carrying out interventions and performing safety checks to remove access to potential means of self-harm. Nurses self-confidence in caring for suicidal patients are highly affected by their suicide literacy level. Staff who are poorly informed on self-harm are less likely to identify at risk individuals.</p><p>Continuous education, updates on best/standardized practices/policy and open communication channels can help nurses stay informed and capable for providing the necessary support to patients at risk of suicide. The aim of the project was to reduce the number of suicidal risk associated incidents in Ward 46 and 46A from a median of 2 episodes per fortnight to 0 episode per fortnight within 9 months.</p></sec><sec><st>Methodology</st><p>Gaps in the workflow for managing patients on suicide precaution were identified, and root causes were determined using a Cause-and-Effect Diagram. A preliminary survey of nurses in Ward 46 &amp; 46A revealed that many staff wanted to enhance their knowledge and skills in caring for patients on suicide precautions. After a second round of multi-voting, three main root causes were identified using a Pareto Chart: lack of guidelines, communication skills, and risk awareness.</p><p>  <b>PDSA 1:</b> The team developed a &lsquo;Quick Reference Poster&rsquo; as a visual aid to assist nurses during safety checks. The poster emphasized important items to look out for, such as jewellery, alcohol handrub, toiletries, sharp objects, patients&lsquo; own medication, and topical creams. It was placed at the Nursing Counter for easy access, and briefings were conducted during rollcalls to ensure staff were aware of its contents. Visual aids were chosen for their ability to enhance memory retention and support better recall in critical moments.</p><p>  <b>PDSA 2:</b> Nurses reported increased confidence in performing safety checks after using the poster. To further strengthen the process, a tiered learning approach was implemented, pairing less experienced staff with Nurse Clinicians during safety checks. This mentorship approach helped build staff confidence and improve communication skills, ensuring that safety checks were conducted effectively and competently.</p><p>  <b>PDSA 3:</b> To address communication challenges, the team developed a script and FAQ guide to help nurses tactfully communicate the need for safety checks with patients and their families. This resource was designed to help nurses address any uncomfortable questions and facilitate open conversations. Briefings were held to ensure all staff were familiar with the script, and the policy was revised to reflect the latest guidelines and best practices for managing patients on suicide precaution.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Significant result was evident comparing the pre and post implementation findings that was carried out to reduce the median episodes of suicidal risk associated incidents. There was a decrease in the median episodes from 2 to 0 since it was last implemented. Although initiatives are in place to ensure patient safety, there are instances where self-harm may be inevitable e.g. patient biting tongue, hitting head against bed rails/wall. The result from our project reinforces SGH&rsquo;s Safety culture by ensuring our patients remain safe throughout their stay.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juan, K. L. L., Kaur, J. D., Yean, L., Guangyan, P., Shaik Hussain, N. B., Kim Choo, M. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.76</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.76</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[76 Safety checks save lives]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A55</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A56</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A58-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[79 Developing a skills escalator for embedding lived experience across an organisation or system to increase the voice of people in developing a more inclusive and responsive culture for improvement]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A58-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>For more than a decade the Advancing Quality Alliance (Aqua) has co-produced our quality improvement offers with Lived Experience Partners. We recognised the need for simultaneous structured development to both enable lived experience partners to operate in strategic influencing and leadership roles in heath and care, and to continue to enable them to collaborate and coproduce with health and care staff in a more tactical and operational space.</p><p>People with Lx often feel they are unable to progress beyond volunteering or entry-level work, particularly if there are no role models.</p><p>Aqua&rsquo;s approach was to upskill individuals to influence service redesign from operational to strategic levels. By constructing an approach using Lx, they can go beyond a tokenistic stakeholder perspective, where people are &lsquo;invited to speak at board&rsquo;, but with no impact or integration into the agenda of the organisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>We have developed career pathways using a skills escalator to help lived experience partners move from to Foundation to Practitioner to Partner levels of practice, and in parallel help health and care staff move from Foundation to Practitioner to Advanced levels of Personalised Care practice, accredited by the Personalised Care Institute.</p><p>Aqua also developed an impact survey to show the impact of lived experience involvement to organisations. It shines a light on how organisations and individuals engage with lived experience, and measures how well they were involved at different events.</p><p>Aqua&rsquo;s lived experience experts have co-designed the lived experience skills escalator and are integral faculty on the delivery teams, and co-deliver on Aqua&rsquo;s personalised care, safety and improvement programmes for health and care staff to name but a few.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Aqua has developed a unique clear, integrated framework to support this approach which supports the NHS Impact improvement agenda and the National Safety agenda.</p><p>Measuring the impact of Lx contribution is paramount. Sometimes, organisations are not ready for co-production and we observe little interaction between Lx partners and staff. The impact survey shines a light on how staff and organisations engage with Lx partners and raise awareness with our staff of the importance of having a Lx Partner engaged as it can shorten the distance to best outcomes.</p><p>Together these approaches shift relationships between organisations, clinicians &amp; patients by meeting the person&rsquo;s needs &amp; priorities before those of the system or professionals and engaging people in their care as fully as possible.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>NHS England (2019) Universal Personalised Care NHS England &raquo; Universal Personalised Care: Implementing the Comprehensive Model</p></li><li><p>NHS England (2023) Listening Well Guidance. NHS England &raquo; Listening well guidance</p></li><li><p>Wolf JA, Niederhauser V, Marshburn D, LaVela SL. Re-examining &lsquo;Defining Patient Experience&rsquo;: The human experience in healthcare. Patient Experience Journal. 2021;<b>8</b>(1):16&ndash;29. doi: 10.35680/2372-0247.1594.</p></li><li><p>Kostal G, Shah A. Putting improvement in everyone&rsquo;s hands: opening up healthcare improvement by simplifying, supporting and refocusing on core purpose. British Journal of Healthcare Management. 2021. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2020.0189</p></li><li><p>International Journal for Quality in Health Care (2021) E Nelson, P Batalden, T Foster; Coproduction of Health, Vol <b>33</b>(2).</p></li><li><p>Kings Fund (2021) &lsquo;Understanding Integration &ndash; How to listen to and learn from people and communities; C Thorstensen-Woll, D Wellings, H Crump, C Grahames Understanding integration: how to listen to and learn from people and communities (kingsfund.org.uk)</p></li><li><p>NHS England/Department for Health &amp; Social Care (2022) Working in Partnership with People and Communities - Statutory Guidance, NHS England &raquo; Working in partnership with people and communities: statutory guidance</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walker, E., Corgie, D., Riste, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.79</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.79</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[79 Developing a skills escalator for embedding lived experience across an organisation or system to increase the voice of people in developing a more inclusive and responsive culture for improvement]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A58</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A58</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A58-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[80 Guiding improvement with dashboard for process based analysis of bed management in a medical centre in Taiwan]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A58-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The issue of hospital bed capacity management significantly impacts patient flow, care quality, and operational efficiency, especially in high-demand environments like National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH). Inefficient discharge processes can cause delays, congestion, and increased operational costs.<sup>1,2</sup> To address these challenges, NTUH implemented technology-driven solutions to automate data processing and improve resource allocation. The hospital designed a real-time dashboard to enhance patient flow, ensuring timely admissions and reducing congestion in the emergency department.<sup>3</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>A collaborative team of clinicians and information technology experts designed a dashboard to enhance bed allocation. Key metrics monitored include emergency and outpatient waiting times, bed occupancy rates, and real-time ward capacity. Statistical trend charts provide insights into patterns across medical specialties and turnover rates. The dashboard leverages real-time updates and user-friendly interfaces for better decision-making.</p></sec><sec><st>Result</st><p>The implementation of the dashboard improved NTUH&rsquo;s efficiency in bed management, reducing system downtime to 2 seconds and achieving data consistency above 99%. Real-time data allowed hospital staff to better manage patient flow, anticipate demand, and allocate resources promptly. The dashboard&rsquo;s trend analysis enabled proactive decision-making, helping the hospital maintain emergency department capacity while optimizing overall resource management.</p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Jack EP, Powers TL. A review and synthesis of demand management, capacity management and performance in health-care services. <I>International Journal of Management Reviews</I> 2009/06/01 2009;<b>11</b>(2):149&ndash;174. doi:<inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00235.x</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Li L, Benton WC. Hospital capacity management decisions: Emphasis on cost control and quality enhancement. <I>European Journal of Operational Research</I> 2003/05/01/2003;<b>146</b>(3):596&ndash;614. doi:<inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00225-4</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Harper PR, Shahani AK. Modelling for the Planning and Management of Bed Capacities in Hospitals. <I>The Journal of the Operational Research Society</I> 2002;<b>53</b>(1):11&ndash;18.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Huang, S.-T., Hsu, P.-J., Huang, H.-F., Lin, Y.-C., Jerng, J.-S., Chen, S.-Y., Chen, Y.-K., Kuo, L.-C., Shang, R.-J., Chen, C.-J., Chao-Chi, H., Chen, H.-H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.80</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.80</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[80 Guiding improvement with dashboard for process based analysis of bed management in a medical centre in Taiwan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A58</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A59</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A59-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[81 A structural solution for safe and efficient medication prescribing, preparation, and administration: the devil is in the details]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A59-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Ensuring safe and efficient medication prescribing, preparation, and administration is a critical challenge in healthcare. Traditional medication order entry relies heavily on human verification, leaving room for protocol deviations, dosing errors, and inefficiencies. A structural solution that integrates all necessary details&mdash;such as drug indications, dosing calculations, preparation instructions, and administration protocols&mdash;could mitigate these risks. This study investigates whether a structured medication order entry system, GenPRES, outperforms manual human checks in enforcing protocol compliance and preventing errors.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A structural solution named GenPRES was developed and implemented in a Dutch PICU. This system ensures precise dosing calculations based on patient-specific characteristics, drug concentrations, practical administration requirements, and considerations for reconstitution and dilution. A prospective observational study compared the effectiveness of GenPRES with traditional manual human checks for detecting protocol violations.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Findings (175 observations) revealed that only 23.1% (9/30) of all protocol violations were detected by manual human control, highlighting a significant risk of undetected errors. In contrast, GenPRES could prevent 100% of protocol violations, ensuring absolute compliance with prescribing, preparation, and administration protocols. The system also improved workflow efficiency by reducing prescription processing time and supporting healthcare providers with clear, actionable prescribing guidance.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>By integrating all necessary prescribing details into a structured, automated system, a 100% protocol-compliant medication order entry process is achievable. The implementation of GenPRES demonstrates that absolute medication safety and efficiency can be realized, eliminating human errors that occur in traditional manual verification methods. Healthcare institutions should consider adopting such structural solutions to enhance medication safety and streamline clinical workflows.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bollen, C., Koers, S., Wannet, D., Liem, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.81</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.81</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[81 A structural solution for safe and efficient medication prescribing, preparation, and administration: the devil is in the details]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A59</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A59</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A59-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[82 Reducing blood culture contamination rates through quality improvement interventions]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A59-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Blood culture contamination is a prevalent issue in healthcare, leading to unnecessary antibiotic use, increased patient risks, and prolonged hospital stays. In 2023, our laboratory&rsquo;s blood culture contamination rates exceeded the system goal of 2% or 20,000 defects per million opportunities (DPMO) for eight out of twelve months, achieving only a 33% success rate. Aligning with High-Reliability Organization (HRO) principles, particularly Preoccupation with Failure, we set a goal to reduce contamination rates below 2% (&lt;20,000 DPMO), with a stretch goal of 1%. This objective was pursued through an awareness campaign targeting phlebotomists and a structured process improvement approach.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A retrospective analysis was conducted within a multicentric hospital in the southwest United States from January to September 2024, encompassing 7,274 blood cultures. Of these, 119 were contaminated, representing an average contamination rate of 1.63%. Key contaminants included Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Micrococcus, Bacillus, Coryneform, Aerococcus, and anaerobic bacteria. Following an intervention initiated in January 2024, contamination rates were monitored monthly, revealing a trend of improvement (e.g., January 1.76%, March 1.38%, July 0.90%, and September 0.34%). Statistical analysis showed significant reductions in contamination rates (p &lt; 0.05) after implementing enhanced training and protocol modifications.</p></sec><sec><st>Interventions</st><p>Increased Awareness: Emphasized the importance of proper skin preparation, particularly with new employees, and facilitated open discussions on the link between sepsis management and accurate blood culture collection.</p><p>Monitoring and Feedback: Monthly contamination rates were shared with phlebotomists. Retraining was previously recommended after three contaminations in one month or two over two consecutive months. To strengthen accountability, we initiated retraining with as few as two monthly contaminations.</p><p>Extended Skin Prep Time: The procedure was adjusted to include a 30-second scrub per side with ChloraPrep, double the prior protocol.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Following the interventions, blood culture contamination rates demonstrated a substantial downward trend. Rates dropped from 1.76% in January to 0.34% in September 2024, averaging 1.46% over 11 months. As shown in <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>, a steady decline was observed until Q3. However, a slight rebound occurred in October (1.92%) and November (1.78%), as illustrated in <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>, although rates remained below the 2% target. Statistical analysis using a paired t-test confirmed a significant reduction in contamination rates post-intervention (p &lt; 0.05), reinforcing the effectiveness of procedural changes and training initiatives. The cumulative reduction directly correlated with fewer false-positive sepsis alerts, a 12% reduction in unnecessary antibiotic use, and an 8% decrease in patient length of stay. While the recent increases highlight the need for continued reinforcement of best practices, the overall trend remains positive, reflecting the lasting impact of our interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>A multi-faceted approach focused on continuous education, reinforcement of proper technique, and rigorous monitoring has successfully reduced blood culture contamination rates in our laboratory. This intervention demonstrates the importance of awareness and protocol fidelity in achieving quality improvement in clinical settings. Ongoing education and positive reinforcement remain critical to sustaining these improvements.</p><p>  <b>Effects of Changes:</b>  </p><p>Reducing blood culture contamination directly improved patient care by cutting unnecessary antibiotic use, reducing complications, and shortening hospital stays, which also generated cost savings. Key challenges included initial resistance to the extended skin prep protocol and the need for ongoing monitoring to maintain adherence.</p><p>  <b>Lessons Learned:</b>  </p><p>We found that continuous education and real-time feedback are essential to sustaining procedural improvements. Earlier engagement with phlebotomists could have smoothed implementation, and establishing feedback loops from the start would have helped address procedural setbacks.</p><p>  <b>Messages for Others:</b>  </p><p>Quality improvement efforts in clinical settings benefit from strong staff involvement, continuous education, and clear data monitoring. Our success in reducing contamination rates not only enhanced patient care but also improved lab efficiency and reduced costs, offering a replicable model for quality enhancement in other clinical procedures.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 82 Figure 1</no><link locator="82_F1"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 82 Figure 2</no><link locator="82_F2"></fig></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kumar, A., Schultz, P., Avalos-Flores, M., Killian, R., Kumar, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.82</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.82</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[82 Reducing blood culture contamination rates through quality improvement interventions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A59</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A61</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A63-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[85 Application of information technology in improving quality of care assessment activities]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A63-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Along with the trend of applying information technology (IT) in healthcare management and operations, many hospitals have digitized their evaluation and quality monitoring processes.</p><p>Thai Binh Provincial General Hospital, Vietnam, a Level I hospital under Vietnam&rsquo;s four-level hospital classification, was established in 1903. We average 800 to 1200 outpatient visits and 1200 to 1500 inpatient admissions daily. Throughout its development, the hospital has implemented various technology solutions such as His <I>(Hospital Information System</I>), Redmine <I>(Project Management Software)</I>, and HRM <I>(Human Resource Management Software)</I>. These applications have effectively addressed issues related to patient management, resource allocation, healthcare economics, administrative procedures, and data reporting. However, a dedicated software solution for managing nursing activities was lacking.</p><p>The quality assessment of patient care at Thai Binh General Hospital currently faces multiple challenges. The evaluation process primarily relies on paper-based forms, requiring substantial manpower, time and lacking accuracy. Therefore, there is an urgent need to optimize the quality assessment of nursing care by integrating management software that ensures efficiency, simplicity, and convenience while minimizing implementation costs.</p><p>Webblog, a Google-based solution, fully digitized the evaluation process, automated data collection and aggregation, and generated real-time reports, thereby enhancing the efficiency of patient care management.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>Evaluation of the Current State of the Nursing Staff&rsquo;s Patient Care Quality Assessment at the Hospital: Time-consuming process (Preparation: 2 days/quarter, Implementation: 3 weeks/quarter, Data processing: 2 weeks/quarter); High resource consumption (Preparation requires 2 personnel; material usage: 3,510 printed pages/quarter, 2 ink cartridges/quarter, 175 pens/quarter); Experienced difficult, untimely, and inaccurate management processes; Experienced high rates of incorrect template usage (18%) and errors in marking and results (22%).</p><p>Application of Webblog and Other Google Tools to Improve the Quality Assessment Process: <I>First Quarter of 2021</I> - Researched suitable software applications and decided to adopt Webblog. Developed toolkits using Google Forms, with each assessment form corresponding to a Google Form. Created a spreadsheet to consolidate all form results, enabling easier tracking and summarization. Established a personal/group Webblog, designed evaluation content (integrating all toolkits into the Webblog), and published posts. Downloaded the Webblog application to mobile devices and selected assessment forms (accessible on both mobile and desktop). <I>Second Quarter of 2021</I> - Pilot implementation, refinement, and improvements. Trained 100% of head nurses and administrative nurses in all departments on installation and usage. <I>Third Quarter of 2021</I> - The Nursing Department organized a professional training session on &lsquo;Creating Forms and Basic Data Processing Using Google Forms in Nursing Care Activities&rsquo;. Subsequently, the Webblog system was fully implemented across the hospital.</p><p>For effectiveness evaluation, a survey was conducted among 100% of head nurses, chief medical technicians, and nursing department staff who had used the Webblog application. The results showed that 100% of users were satisfied and wished to continue using Webblog.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Economic Efficiency: No cost required for designing and maintaining the application annually. Savings of 4,934,800 VND per year, primarily from reduced paper usage (from 3,510 sheets to 100 sheets per quarter) and the elimination of other material costs. Time savings were achieved in preparation (reduced from 3 days to 1/2 day) and in data compilation, processing, and reporting (reduced from 3 weeks to 3&ndash;4 days).</p><p>Process Efficiency: Ensured convenience and ease of use on both mobile phones and computers. Integrates multiple forms into a single link, providing high accuracy and data security. Enhances proactive and timely management and monitoring.</p><p>100% of head nurses and chief medical technicians chose to continue using the Webblog initiative. 40% suggested further developing and expanding software applications for other activities.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The application of Webblog has significantly improved the quality assessment of patient care at Thai Binh Provincial General Hospital. This initiative not only saves time, manpower, and costs but also enhances the accuracy and professionalism in data management. In the future, it will be necessary to continue refining and expanding the scope of application to further optimize nursing care practices.</p><p>Improving the quality assessment of patient care by nurses through the Webblog application is one of many steps toward the hospital&rsquo;s healthcare system&rsquo;s global digital transformation.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chinh Nguyen, T. M., Lai, D. T., Trung Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, D. T., Anh Ngo, T. L., Bui, T. H., Xuan Pham, T. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.85</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.85</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[85 Application of information technology in improving quality of care assessment activities]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A63</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A63</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A63-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[86 Mind the gap: continuing professional development of nurses to safeguard future quality of care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A63-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Nurses are the largest group of healthcare providers across the world and have a pivotal role in providing good quality of care regarding health promotion, prevention and treatment. Research showed that inability to access resources and activities for Continuing Professional Development (CPD) influences quality of care and adversely affects nurses&rsquo; satisfaction, recruitment and retention. A comprehensive overview about the needs of nurses for successful CPD is missing. In addition, competencies gained through CPD fail to integrate into nursing practice. Effective transfer of knowledge and skills to the workplace is essential for good quality of care. However, there is a lack of comprehensive, validated instruments to assess training transfer in nursing practice. Therefore, the aims are to: 1) to provide a comprehensive overview regarding factors that influence CPD over a nursing career and 2) to develop and validate a questionnaire capable of measuring training transfer as an integrated construct, encompassing all factors influencing this process in nursing practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>1) Scoping review, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews. 2) The study followed a developmental, iterative approach guided by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Analyses of the scoping review showed that factors that influence CPD differ over a nursing career, which led to the identification of three groups: newly graduated nurses; experienced nurses; and experienced nurses with ambitions for advanced roles. Furthermore, analyses showed that factors for all three groups are related to personal and contextual facilitators and barriers. Newly graduated nurses find it important to be an accepted member of the team. They experience barriers when integrating into the nursing profession. Experienced nurses experience contextual barriers related to a lack of supportive structures and inaccessibility of CPD resources. There is limited time and availability of role models and a lack of support from managers and other colleagues. For the experienced nurses with ambitions for advanced roles, an important barrier is that nursing culture emphasizes direct patient care. Often it is unclear what the value is of new nursing roles which makes it difficult for them to develop these.</p></li><li><p>Results of the development and validation of the integrated measure for training transfer in nursing practice showed a good fit for nursing practice (Normed 2 of 2.014, TLI of 0.900, CFI of 0.907, and RMSEA of 0.051 [CI=0.048&ndash;0.054]). Almost 1600 nurses filled in the questionnaire and preliminary results show important relations between contextual, personal and training-related influencing factors. In addition, data show significant differences between types of nurses and their training transfer in nursing practice.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hakvoort, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.86</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.86</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[86 Mind the gap: continuing professional development of nurses to safeguard future quality of care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A63</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A64</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A64-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[87 Three basic training courses on palliative care for people with incurable cancer; a national evaluation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A64-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>People are living longer and longer with incurable cancer. To provide good care, it is important that all healthcare providers involved are skilled in palliative care. However, palliative care is not a standard part of education for future healthcare providers (2016)<sup>1</sup> and two-thirds of nurses, caregivers and assistants of general practitioners feel the need for training in the field of palliative care (2020).<sup>2</sup> The national program Palliative Care Training is set up to improve care for people with incurable cancer by training healthcare professionals.</p><p>The Palliative Care Training program created three Basic Palliative Care Trainings; one for nursing assistants and caregivers, one for nurses, and one for practitioners (nurse practitioners (NP), physician assistants (PA) and physicians). These training courses are given between March 2024 and December 2025. The accredited training is offered in-company and via open registration throughout the country. All over the Netherlands, organisations that are already involved in the training of healthcare professionals, adopt the training courses and offer them at a low price to healthcare providers in their region. This will ensure continuation of the courses after the program has ended. The training is given interactively with practice-oriented case studies. Ultimately 3,525 healthcare providers will be trained.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The training courses are evaluated on 1) experiences of participants with the training (8 items); 2) the extent to which participants apply what they have learned in their work after the training (8 items). Questionnaires were drawn up using the Kirkpatrick training evaluation model (2024, 2025).<sup>3 4</sup> Participants receive a (digital) questionnaire before the training (T0), immediately after the training (T1), 3&ndash;4 months after the training (T2). The questionnaires consist almost entirely of closed questions. During the conference interim results from T0 and T1 based on descriptive statistics are reported.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Currently, 613 T0 and 676 T1 questionnaires are filled in. Practitioners mark their training with a 7.4 (SD 1.3), nurses with a 7.4 (SD 1.7) and nursing assistants and caregivers with a 8.5 (SD 1.0). The top 3 of areas that are influenced the most by the training (at T1) are: spiritual (51%), psychological (41%) and physical care (36%) for practitioners; spiritual (47%), psychological (36%) and physical (35%) care for nurses; and physical (57%), psychological (51%) and spiritual (50%) care for nursing assistants and caregivers.</p><p>Participants value the training, especially the nursing assistants and caregivers. In all three trainings, most impact is achieved on the areas of spiritual, psychological and physical care. Current care and education is focused on making people better, and less on supporting people who do not get better. This training equips health care providers to provide appropriate care at the end of life.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Kennissynthese onderwijs palliatieve zorg. Aanbevelingen voor een toekomstgericht, efficie&#x0308;nt en kwalitatief goed onderwijsaanbod voor alle professionele zorgverleners in de palliatieve zorg. [Knowledge synthesis on palliative care education. Recommendations for a future proof, efficient and high quality supply of training and education in palliative care]. VUmc in opdracht van ZonMw. 2016.</p></li><li><p>De Veer A, Joren C, de Groot K, Francke A. Grote behoefte aan scholing in palliatieve zorg.{Great need for training in palliative care]. Utrecht: Nivel, 2020.</p></li><li><p>Anderson LN, J Merkebu J. The kirkpatrick model: a tool for evaluating educational research. <I>Fam Med.</I> 2024 Jun;<b>56</b>(6):403. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2024.161519.</p></li><li><p>Miranda FM, Santos BV, Kristman VL, Mininel VA. Employing Kirkpatrick&rsquo;s framework to evaluate nurse training: an integrative review. <I>Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem.</I> 2025;<b>33</b>:e4431. Doi:10.1590/1518-8345.7250.4431.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Plas, A. v. d., Meggelen, M. v., Hetem, J., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.87</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.87</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[87 Three basic training courses on palliative care for people with incurable cancer; a national evaluation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A64</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A64</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A64-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[88 Quality in oral care: horizontal and vertical co-creation in deliver]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A64-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>DELIVER (DELiberative ImproVEment of oRal care quality) is a comprehensive initiative funded under the European Union&rsquo;s Horizon Europe program. It aims to improve oral healthcare quality across practice, community, national, and international levels.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>We aim to analyse the interactions between stakeholders in their efforts to improve the quality of oral healthcare at the community level with implications for health policy.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods Used</st><p>Deliberative methods within the broader DELIVER project, seek to map oral healthcare priorities among stakeholders from healthcare, oral care and social care disciplines. Situational mapping is used to provide insights into the most pressing concerns and aspirations regarding oral health in the community (needs assessment). In subsequent focus group discussion, citizens, oral health professionals and other (health) professionals are invited to work with the researchers to co-design solutions.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Stakeholders identified a critical need for simplified access to oral care for all citizens, social support and personalised communication. The issue of unclarity about who is responsible for oral healthcare and quality improvement at the community level was emphasized. Improved governance, allocating responsibilities, cooperation and legislative instruments for oral healthcare quality improvement for treatment and for targeted prevention and monitoring are needed &ndash; at least for the adult population. Since the general practitioner and dentist are not in regular interdisciplinary systems or consultation groups, this group is hard to be located and namely addressed. Suggested solutions were: improved communication directed at vulnerable groups, and improved oral health financing, including access to governmental/public bodies and practice based sources, alignment in local insurance schemes, and provision of oral hygiene materials.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions and Implications</st><p>Primary oral care has been siloed out in terms of (legislative) quality instruments for targeted prevention and monitoring as well as interdisciplinary cooperation. This concerns especially the population group that (assume that they) cannot access oral care in a sustainable manner covering monitoring and prevention tools. Significant challenges lie in the lack of clear responsibility and governance between the different social and healthcare providers. These apply both horizontally within communities, i.e. between care providers, social workers, and citizens, and vertically, i.e. in the referral between community and practice level, including dentistry practices and hospitals (orofacial surgery). There is an urgent need for enhanced coordination, defined accountability, and stronger legislative frameworks to support oral health initiatives embedded in the healthcare system.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van der Linden, M., van Ardenne, E., Begovic, S., Gitz, S., Eisemann de Almeida, L., Rosing, K., Listl, S., Volgenant, C., van der Veen, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.88</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.88</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[88 Quality in oral care: horizontal and vertical co-creation in deliver]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A64</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A65</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A67-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[91 Improving discharge analgesics after lung cancer surgery: ensuring the provision of simple analgesics rather only using high-strength opioids]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A67-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The Royal Victoria Hospital in Belfast is the regional centre for thoracic surgery in Northern Ireland. The service provides surgery for thoracic tumours such as lung cancer surgery.</p><p>Lung cancer surgery is often associated with significant post-operative pain and has been linked to a high risk of prolonged post-operative opioid use. To help reduce opioid requirement, it is recommended that opioids are best used in combination with simple analgesics such as paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAID&rsquo;s), where appropriate. Initial anecdotal evidence suggested that rather than having simple analgesics as their first-line pain medication, some patients were being discharged after surgery on high-strength opioid analgesics but no simple analgesics.</p><p>A quality improvement project was conducted based on the use of the analgesics (painkillers) of opioid nai&#x0308;ve patients (i.e. patients who were not already on opioid analgesics) who were being discharged after lung cancer surgery in this unit.</p><p>The aim was to reduce the number of opioid nai&#x0308;ve patients, who had lung cancer surgery, being discharged on high-strength opioid analgesics without simple analgesics, by 20% from beginning of October 2023 to end of June 2024.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Details of discharge medications were collected retrospectively from the regional electronic healthcare system.</p><p>Baseline data revealed that 31% of patients were being discharged after lung cancer surgery on high-strength opioid analgesia with no simple analgesics.</p><p>Quality improvement methodology was utilised to assess processes and outcomes, with regular multidisciplinary meetings. The two key change ideas (implemented as Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles) were:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Education sessions for doctors, nursing and pharmacy staff (commenced December 2023), and</p></li><li><p>The development and implementation of guidelines for prescribing discharge analgesia, based on existing best practice guidelines and correspondence with other thoracic units throughout the United Kingdom. These guidelines advised the use of simple analgesics such as paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAID&rsquo;s), where appropriate, as a first line, with supplemental opioids. Details were disseminated among staff via e-mail and verbally, and copies of the guidelines were placed in clinical areas.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Details of discharge medications were collected retrospectively from the discharge prescription in regional electronic healthcare records, and collated to create a run chart.</p><p>Following the implementation of the education sessions, there was a brief improvement in prescribing however this was not sustained.</p><p>Following the implementation of prescribing guidelines, there was a sustained improvement, with the practice of prescribing high-strength opioid analgesics without simple analgesics almost completely ceasing (new median of 0%).</p><p>Telephone follow-up by specialist nurses, and reviews of each patient&rsquo;s regional electronic healthcare record at one month after discharge, demonstrated that no patients had required increased painkillers from either their general practitioner (primary care provider) or hospital in the month after discharge.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The implementation of these guidelines for discharge analgesic prescribing led to a clear improvement in prescribing practices, without patients reporting issues with pain control or seeking additional prescribed analgesics after discharge.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Montgomery, L., Craig, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.91</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.91</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[91 Improving discharge analgesics after lung cancer surgery: ensuring the provision of simple analgesics rather only using high-strength opioids]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A67</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A67</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A67-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[92 Co-creating design-directives for a new residential elderly psychiatric care facility in Belgium: a bottom-up approach to evidence-based design]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A67-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Residential psychiatric elderly care in Belgium is facing major challenges through the development of new legislation, demographic changes, and intensification of care needs, in combination with limited (human) resources, a weakening of the social construct and continuously evolving insights in psychiatric care provision. The residential psychiatric care facility wants to face these challenges through the development of a strategic framework and a clear vision of future residential psychiatric care provision and how this translates to the building-directives of a new building supported by both healthcare personnel and patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A mixed-methods approach based on the Evidence-Based Design Framework was used whereby a quantitative analysis of the population needs preceded sequential qualitative analyses. Walkthroughs with employees mapping current practices and (work)flows were used to gather and provide insight into current practices. These were followed by written interviews in which different employee profiles provided insight into the strengths and limitations of current practices and suggestions for future improvements, all from a building-design perspective. Both walkthroughs and written interviews informed discussions during focus groups with patients and their relatives, and with employees. In these interviews, we moved from the operational level to a more strategic level to develop guiding principles for the design of the new residential care facility. After each analysis, a steering committee consisting of operational and strategic profiles gathered to discuss the new insights. Afterwards, the steering committee participated in a workshop on strategic thinking, in which several scenarios based on i. the evidence-build design principles, ii. current and (known) future legislation, iii. trends in care needs and iv. patient- and employee perspectives were discussed. Finally, C-level profiles responsible for the strategic and financial decisions, and team-coordinators responsible for the operational working of the division were presented with these scenarios and the results of the steering committee workshops. After thorough discussion in a strategic impact workshop, a set of clear design-directives was developed in collaboration with the architects responsible for the design of the new residential care facility.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Ten guiding principles for the building-design were distilled from the quantitative and qualitative analyses: anticipating future care needs, safeguarding patient privacy and autonomy, improving care accessibility, implementing patient-tailored stimulus regulation, normalizing psychiatric care, providing evidence-based and holistic care, maximizing contact with nature, focusing on patient and personnel safety, standardizing logistics, and foreseeing in flexible use of spaces. Six non-mutually exclusive scenarios were further developed to foster a discussion about building design: the institution as a community, incorporating the garden as therapy space, organizing patient groups based on a stepped care model, the degree of digitization, flexible intake-criteria, and reducing patient group size. Based on this discussion, the C-level participants developed a strategic vision incorporating different (sub) scenarios from which design-directives were developed in collaboration with the responsible architects.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The use of a bottom-up co-creative process with patients, healthcare professionals and C-level profiles can lead to the development of a shared and evidence-based vision for the design of a future-proof psychiatric residential healthcare facility.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathalie, D. W., Elise, L., Pieter, V., Caroline, V., Ine, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.92</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.92</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[92 Co-creating design-directives for a new residential elderly psychiatric care facility in Belgium: a bottom-up approach to evidence-based design]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A67</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A68</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A68-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[93 To save cost by reducing wastage of microspore tapes in ward 11B\C by 80% within 3 months]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A68-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Singapore General Hospital (SGH), Ward 11B/C department of internal medicine accommodates patients with various chronic and acute conditions requiring intravenous cannulation, wound care, and catheter management. Micropore tape, available in three sizes with 12 pieces per box, is essential for securing medical devices, lines, and dressings. However, the current practice leads to significant wastage and infection risks, as partially used tapes become contaminated when left in various locations throughout the ward. This study aims to reduce micropore tape wastage by 80% within three months, form 20 pieces per day to 4 pieces per day, through targeted interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Intervention</st><p>A quality improvement initiative was undertaken to address the micropore tape wastage issue. The team employed a systematic approach using quality improvement tools, specifically a fishbone diagram for root cause analysis and a Pareto chart for factor prioritization. Key interventions included in-service talks on infection control by the infection prevention nurse, pre-packaging micropore tapes in zip-lock bags for patient bedside storage, and monthly orientation sessions for new doctors. Data on tape wastage were collected over one month to establish a baseline and monitor post-implementation outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Result</st><p>Following the interventions, a significant reduction in micropore tape wastage was observed, achieving the targeted of 4 pieces per day. This reduction translated to an annual saving of 5,840 pieces of tape, amounting to cost savings of approximately $3,796. The results also indicated improved infection control practices and reduced cross-contamination within the ward. Sustainability plans include extending the process to other wards, orienting new staff, and continuous monitoring to promote lean practices.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[XX, G., YPR, T., Sinnappan, T., Binte Mohd, N. F., Binte Suhari, N. A., Binte Ab Razak, N., Ch.Y, S., Bin Hasan, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.93</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.93</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[93 To save cost by reducing wastage of microspore tapes in ward 11B\C by 80% within 3 months]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A68</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A68</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A68-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[94 Educating patients and caregivers expectations during their casting journey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A68-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>In musculoskeletal clinics, the application of casts for various fractures often leads to dissatisfaction among patients and caregivers regarding the length and position of the cast.<sup>1,2</sup> Misunderstandings about the casting process can disrupt clinic flow, necessitating repeated explanations and counseling. This study aims to educate patients and caregivers about their expectations during the casting journey to enhance satisfaction and streamline clinic operations.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim</st><p>To improve patient and caregiver understanding of cast length and position through effective communication and visual education.</p></sec><sec><st>Methodology</st><p>A survey comprising four questions was administered to patients and caregivers to assess their understanding of the casting process. The questions focused on the clarity of explanations provided by doctors, understanding of cast length and position, and overall satisfaction with the explanation relative to the final cast appearance. Identified problems included misinterpretation of cast details, insufficient explanations due to time constraints, language barriers, and a lack of standardized communication. To address these issues, visual educational materials (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>), were introduced.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 94 Figure 1</no><caption><p>A model with different length and positions of cast</p></caption><link locator="94_F1"></fig></p><p>The visual education materials were presented to the Orthopaedic surgeons on 3 December 2021 to inform them of the changes. The surgeons were encouraged to utilize these materials, which were made available in all consultation rooms throughout the musculoskeletal clinic.</p><p>As part of continuous improvement and sustainability efforts, the team gathered feedback after March 2022. Newly posted doctors reported being unaware of the posters. Following discussions, two PDSA 2 solutions were implemented in April 2022: placing posters on tables during all clinic sessions and including the new practices in the orientation checklist for newly posted doctors.</p></sec><sec><st>Result</st><p>The same survey was adopted during the post implementation (December 2021 and March 2022), yielding significant improvements in all four questions as compared to pre-implementation (September 2021 to October 2021). Additionally, analysis from the results from August 2022 to September 2022 demonstrated sustained improvement (<cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>):</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 94 Table 1</no><caption><p>Comparison of survey results during pre-implementation, post-implementation, and sustainability periods</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Question</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Pre-implementation</b>  <br>  <b>September 2021 to October 2021 </b>  <b>(N=30)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Post-implementation</b>  <br>  <b>December 2021 and March 2022 </b>  <b>(N=60)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Sustainability Period</b>  <br>  <b>August 2022 to September 2022 </b>  <b>(N=40)</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="4" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Q1: Clarity of explanation </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">80% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">100% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">100% </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Q2: Understanding of cast length </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">53% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">100% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">100% </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Q3: Understanding of cast position </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">33% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">93% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">100% </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Q4: Overall satisfaction </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">67% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">100% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">100% </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p>Additionally, the intervention resulted in significant time saved that translated to activity cost savings, with an estimated annual saving of 486.2 hours and $7,632 per plaster technician.</p></sec><sec><st>Impact</st><p>The standardized explanation using visual aids has been successfully integrated into daily operations, with evidence of sustainability reflected in the maintained satisfaction rates. Overall, this project demonstrates that effective communication and visual education can significantly enhance patient experience and operational efficiency in musculoskeletal clinics.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Fred RT. Nelson Carolyn Tailaferro Blauvelt: Cast, splints, dressings, and traction; 2007. A manual of Orthopaedic Terminology (Seventh edition).</p></li><li><p>Ellsworth BK, Bram JT, Haeberle HS, DeFrancesco CJ, Scher DM. Back to Basics: Pediatric Casting Techniques, Pearls, and Pitfalls. <I>Iowa Orthop J</I>. 2023 Dec;<b>43</b>(2):79&ndash;89. PMID: 38213863; PMCID: PMC10777705.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mishra, N., Oo, J., Yeo, G., Samat, H. B., Abdullah, S., Cha, E., Ong, L. L., Saw, S., Choe, D., Ong, X. Y., Wong, B., Neo, J., Mahadev, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.94</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.94</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[94 Educating patients and caregivers expectations during their casting journey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A68</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A69</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A70-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[96 Auditing the process of medication verification at hospital admission: the experience in 4 Belgian hospitals (Andreaz network)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A70-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The medication verification process at patient admission within the Andreaz network hospitals (AZ Vesalius, Jessa Hospital, Sint-Trudo Hospital, and Sint-Franciscus Hospital) follows a standardized three-step protocol: 1) Verification: obtain a medication list based on reliable sources within 24 hours of admission; 2) Clarification: clarify the medication list in a conversation with the patient/relative (and check discrepancies with community healthcare professionals); 3) Reconciliation: all changes have to be documented in the patient file, and the process of medication verification has to be logged. This study aimed to examine whether the professional profile (physician, nurse, or pharmacy assistant) conducting medication verification affects the process quality.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>In May 2023, audits were performed to assess two key performance indicators: 1) The percentage of patients for whom all medication verification steps were completed (goal: &gt;80%); 2) The percentage of patients with one or more discrepancies identified when a hospital pharmacist, considered the gold standard, repeated medication verification (goal: &lt;20%). Discrepancies were classified by severity using the NCC MERP index.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Regarding adherence, in 83% of the included patients (n=63), all steps of medication verification were completed (verification: 95%, clarification: 100%, reconciliation: 88%). Observation bias may have influenced these results.</p><p>Quality of delivery: Medication verification is time-intensive (median: 15 minutes/patient, interquartile range 10&ndash;24). When assessing only recorded medications, discrepancies were found in 67% of cases (n=107), with forgotten home medications being the most common (40%). When only discrepancies of severity &lsquo;temporary harm&rsquo; or higher were considered, the discrepancy rate was 48%. Regression analysis showed no significant impact of factors such as admission type (planned or emergency), hospital, healthcare professional profile, patient age, or number of home medications on the likelihood of discrepancies. However, the average number of discrepancies was significantly lower (p&lt;0.01) when medication verification was performed by a pharmacy assistant, though this was not statistically significant for severe discrepancies.</p><p>The study&rsquo;s findings underscore the need for enhanced training in medication verification. While time-consuming, medication verification is essential for preventing medication errors. Further research should explore the role of hospital pharmacists, especially for high-risk patients, and consider including pharmacists in the control group. Pharmacy assistants may be a cost-effective choice, as they showed lower discrepancy rates and reduced salary costs without compromising quality. These results leaded to an increase in the number of full-time equivalents of pharmacy assistants employed for MV in Andreaz (May 2023:10.9,October 2024:13). An e-learning program is implemented to improve quality and logging of MV will be monitored with a query. Regular auditing can help identify gaps in this process and guide targeted improvements.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eline, V., Liesbeth, D., Luce, D., Bart, B., Noa, V., Sofie, W., Jochen, B., Elke, D. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.96</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.96</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[96 Auditing the process of medication verification at hospital admission: the experience in 4 Belgian hospitals (Andreaz network)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A70</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A70</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A70-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[97 Risky business. A quality improvement project to improve risk management communication]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A70-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Incident reports are raised when events do not occur as expected, with the aim of enabling change and improving patient care. However, the format in which these reports were distributed&mdash;bulky email summaries&mdash;led to difficulties in tracking outcomes and engaging clinicians. As a result, learning from incidents was inconsistent, contributing to repeated errors such as children missing drug doses. A more engaging and accessible approach to sharing incident feedback was needed to improve patient safety and clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim</st><p>To improve the dissemination and engagement with incident reports to facilitate learning and reduce repeat events.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A quality improvement approach was taken, informed by the Model for Improvement. The process began with a diagnostic phase, including mapping the incident reporting process from submission to change in practice, exploring potential causes of the problem using a fishbone diagram and gathering informal feedback from families on ward rounds to understand the patient perspective.</p><p>Interventions were tested using Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles, including:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>A pictorial newsletter summarising key learning themes and action points (adopted).</p></li><li><p>Discussion of all incidents in safety huddles (abandoned).</p></li><li><p>Encouraging all clinicians to attend risk meetings (abandoned).</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Baseline measures were established, and a run chart was used to track progress towards the SMART aim of having all incident report feedback presented in a clear, engaging, and accessible format by the end of October 2024. The pictorial newsletter demonstrated sustained engagement, with five consecutive data points below the baseline, indicating a statistically significant improvement.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The adoption of the &lsquo;Risky business&rsquo; newsletter has improved risk management communication by making incident report feedback more accessible, engaging and educational for clinicians, aligning with the PSIRF (patient safety incident report feedback) framework. The thematic feedback mechanism has enabled a culture where the focus is on learning from incidents with visible outcomes to improve patient care.</p><p>Future considerations include automating the dissemination process and integrating administrative support to ensure sustainability.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Magwenzi, M. M., Omar, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.97</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.97</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[97 Risky business. A quality improvement project to improve risk management communication]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A70</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A71</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A71-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[98 Improving maternity care experiences for black and mixed-black families together: co-producing priorities between communities and professionals in a London integrated care system]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A71-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Ethnic disparities in maternity care continue to affect Black, African, Caribbean, and mixed-Black heritage families in England, leading to poorer care experiences and health outcomes compared to other minoritised ethnic groups.<sup>1&ndash;3</sup> In the UK, Black women face three times higher maternal mortality rates than their white counterparts.<sup>4</sup> This is driven by structural and interpersonal racism within the healthcare system, inequities in resource allocation in relation to the wider social determinants of health, and fragmentation in the health care system which culminate in barriers in accessing personalised care, leading to mistrust and underutilisation of health services.<sup>2,5&ndash;7</sup>  </p><p>Given the longstanding ethnic disparities in healthcare, integrated care systems were established in 2022 to facilitate collaboration between the English National Health Service (NHS), local authorities, and the communities.<sup>8</sup> Co-production with communities is recognised as a fundamental approach in addressing health inequities and improving the safety and quality of care; however, to be constructive within an integrated care system, it requires shared goals and objectives between all parties.<sup>9</sup> Thus, this study aimed to understand the alignment of health and local authority professional perspectives with community needs on how to improve the experience of maternity care for Black families living in West London.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Using the nominal group technique, five separate nominal groups were conducted with NHS health professionals, three West London local authorities, community groups; and women and birthing people from Black, African, Caribbean, and mixed-Black heritage backgrounds. Each group was asked to brainstorm potential solutions to improving maternity experiences for Black families and anonymously rank top five solutions using a survey. Community workshops were held in community centres and were facilitated by two community organisers and lived experience partners using a trauma-informed approach.<sup>10</sup> Priorities were analysed using McMillan <I>et al</I>&rsquo;s multi-group nominal group technique methodology.<sup>11</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Fifty-four individuals attended the workshops, with 50% of attendees being community members. 89 unique ideas across 11 themes emerged from the workshops, with improving staff knowledge and capabilities in providing culturally tailored care as a shared priority across all groups. Maternity hospital staff prioritised providing information and education to families, while local authority and healthcare staff focused on solutions where health and community organisations collaborate to provide integrated care. Community groups uniquely prioritised having community-led advocacy mechanisms and culturally tailored mental health support, which were not highly prioritised by professionals.<sup>10</sup> The results demonstrated the importance of working closely with lived experience partners when setting co-production quality improvement priorities.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Thomas K. Listening to Mums: Ending the Postcode Lottery on Perinatal Care. All-Party Parliamentary Group on Birth Trauma. 2024.</p></li><li><p>Henderson J, Gao H, Redshaw M. Experiencing maternity care: the care received and perceptions of women from different ethnic groups. <I>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</I>. 2013;<b>13</b>:196. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-196</p></li><li><p>Abe C, Awe T, Peter M, <I>et al.</I> The Black Maternity Experience Report: a nationwide study of Black women&rsquo;s experiences of maternity services in the United Kingdom. 2022.</p></li><li><p>Felker A, Patel R, Kotnis R, <I>et al.</I> Saving Lives, Improving Mothers&rsquo; Care State of the Nation Surveillance Report: Surveillance findings from the UK Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths 2020&ndash;2022. MBRRACE-UK: Maternal, Newborn and Infant Clinical Outcome Review Programme 2024.</p></li><li><p>Birthrights. Systemic racism, not broken bodies: an inquiry into racial injustice and human rights in UK maternity care. 2022.</p></li><li><p>Williams C., McKail R., Arshad R. &lsquo;We need to be heard. We need to be seen&rsquo;: A thematic analysis of black maternal experiences of birthing and postnatal care in England within the context of Covid-19. <I>Midwifery</I>. 2023;<b>127</b>:103856. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103856</p></li><li><p>MacLellan J, Collins S, Myatt M, <I>et al.</I> Black, Asian and minority ethnic women&rsquo;s experiences of maternity services in the UK: A qualitative evidence synthesis. <I>Journal of Advanced Nursing</I>. 2022;<b>78</b>:2175&ndash;90. doi: 10.1111/jan.15233</p></li><li><p>NHS England and NHS Improvement. Building strong integrated care systems everywhere ICS implementation guidance on working with people and communities. 2021.</p></li><li><p>Kaehne A, Beacham A, Feather J. Co-production in integrated health and social care programmes: a pragmatic model. <I>JICA</I>. 2018;<b>26</b>:87&ndash;96. doi: 10.1108/JICA-11-2017-0044</p></li><li><p>Aryasinghe S, Averill P, Waithe C, <I>et al.</I> Improving the maternity experience for Black, African, Caribbean and mixed-Black families in an integrated care system: a multigroup community and interprofessional co-production prioritisation exercise using nominal group technique. <I>BMJ Qual Saf</I>. Published Online First: 27 November 2024. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017848</p></li><li><p>McMillan SS, Kelly F, Sav A, <I>et al.</I> Using the Nominal Group Technique: how to analyse across multiple groups. <I>Health Serv Outcomes Res Method</I>. 2014;<b>14</b>:92&ndash;108. doi: 10.1007/s10742-014-0121-1</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aryasinghe, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.98</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.98</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[98 Improving maternity care experiences for black and mixed-black families together: co-producing priorities between communities and professionals in a London integrated care system]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A71</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A71</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A71-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[99 Patient first improvement system: celebrating a journey of continuous improvement]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A71-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The Darzi independent report emphasises the fundamental need for our healthcare services to improve and innovate<sup>1</sup> and improvement methodologies are, more and more, in use across the NHS. The application of Lean thinking,<sup>2</sup> strategy deployment and capability building is rapidly becoming the norm within our healthcare organisations. Such systems may help to bring a ray of hope to the future landscape of the NHS. This presentation focusses on the capability building programme of one acute trust in the South East of England and the progress, so far, that results from empowering staff to become problem solvers and to have a voice that counts.<sup>3</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>Following the introduction of a performance management system<b>,</b> the Patient First Improvement System was established. This is a structured training and coaching programme developed for staff at all levels. This encompasses Lean core concepts such as identifying waste, strategy deployment processes, A3 structured problem-solving and practical workshops on how to run Lean improvement huddles. Improvement huddles follow a standard work. All staff are encouraged to raise improvement tickets when they identify areas of waste, improvement opportunities and problems highlighted through their performance and quality metrics. Improvement tickets are discussed and prioritised during weekly improvement huddles where teams come together to apply their knowledge and find solutions. All improvements are linked to the Trust strategy, giving our staff a &lsquo;line-of-sight&rsquo; to organisational priorities, ensuring staff understand how their contribution makes a difference to the bigger picture.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Two years in, 87 multi-disciplinary teams across all clinical and corporate divisions have been trained and coached to drive the Patient First Improvement System and build a culture of continuous improvement. Over 1200 improvement tickets have been implemented with many more in active progress. The realised benefits range from improving patient experience and quality, encouraging staff engagement, and better utilisation of resources. Tickets raised by our staff have led to improvements in many areas such as Radiology becoming paperless, and Trauma and Orthopaedics improving their patient discharge times. Feedback from staff describe the huddle boards as a really beneficial tool to use as a structured way to implement new ideas, enabling teams to operate more cohesively in responding to staff and patient needs.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>GOV.UK. Independent investigation of the NHS in England. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/independent-investigation-of-the-nhs-in-england</inter-ref> (cited March 2025).</p></li><li><p>Womack JP, Jones DT. Lean thinking&mdash;banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Journal of the operational research society. 1997 Nov 1;48(11):1148</p></li><li><p>NHS England. Our NHS people promise. https://www.england.nhs.uk/our-nhs-people/online-version/lfaop/our-nhs-people-promise/(cited March 2025)</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bonifacio, L., Marchant, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.99</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.99</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[99 Patient first improvement system: celebrating a journey of continuous improvement]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A71</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A72</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A72-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[100 Catheter-free is better: a cross-sectional de-implementation project to reduce the number of urinary and intravenous catheters used without a clear indication]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A72-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Hospitalized patients often receive medical devices such as drains, intravenous (IV) lines, and catheters as part of their treatment. Because these devices are foreign to the body, they increase the risk of infection, which can be particularly dangerous for vulnerable patients</p><p>Sometimes, the indication for an IV line or catheter is unclear. As a result, it cannot always be determined with certainty whether the proper care is being provided. Evaluating this care is therefore of great importance. Nationally, several programs focus on assessing care and promoting appropriate healthcare use. A peripheral hospital in the central Netherlands is part of a network that evaluates and optimizes healthcare practices. Through this network, a project was initiated to assess the appropriate use of peripheral IV lines and catheters.</p><p>This project aimed to reduce the number of unnecessary peripheral IV lines and catheters through targeted interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>For this project, the prevalence of IV lines and catheters was determined using a cross-sectional approach. Before the project started, a hospital-wide working group was established, including participation from nurses, physicians, and policy officers. This working group developed strategies to reduce the number of unnecessary IV lines and catheters.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The working group recruited a nurse &lsquo;champion&rsquo; for each nursing department. These champions played a key role in the project, because they lead the implementation. A baseline and an effect measurement were conducted using a validated questionnaire, administered by the nurse champion.</p><p>The baseline measurement, conducted in January 2022, showed that 68% of IV lines and catheters were placed with an appropriate indication. In response,several interventions were implemented, including:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Clinical lessons for nurses and physicians.</p></li><li><p>Announcements on the hospital intranet, with a structured communication plan in place.</p></li><li><p>Posters distributed in all nursing departments, outlining the appropriate indications for IV lines and catheters.</p></li><li><p>Updated protocols to reflect best practices.</p></li><li><p>Educational videos created and distributed to raise awareness.</p></li></l></p><p>Six months later, in June 2022, a follow-up measurement was carried out to assess the impact of these interventions. The results indicated an improvement, with the percentage of appropriate IV lines and catheters increasing to 82%. This demonstrates the positive effect of the interventions.</p><p>To ensure long-term impact, nurse ambassadors remain active, the measurement is repeated annually, and results are analyzed to guide further improvement.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bank, A., Bloemhof, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.100</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.100</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[100 Catheter-free is better: a cross-sectional de-implementation project to reduce the number of urinary and intravenous catheters used without a clear indication]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A72</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A72</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A72-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[101 Improving nursing staff satisfaction by abolishing the standard scoring of pain, pressure ulcers and malnutrition in pregnant, laboring and postpartum hospitalised women]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A72-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Context</st><p>This study was conducted at Medisch Spectrum Twente (MST), one of the largest top-clinical teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Approximately 3500 employees are committed to promoting health in close cooperation with its regional healthcare partners. In MST, nurses are required to standard screen patients for pain, pressure ulcers and malnutrition. The research was carried out in the mother-child unit, where a team of (obstetric) nurses work.</p></sec><sec><st>Problem</st><p>Disrupting healthcare is an important topic among hospitals in the Netherlands. Aim of disrupting care is to reduce regulatory pressure by letting go of redundant processes, resulting in nurses experiencing an increased job satisfaction and available time for the patient. To address the issue of disrupting care in our hospital, a Nursing Safety Officer was appointed in 2022 to support nursing departments upon request.</p><p>In the beginning of 2023, a disruptive issue arose in the mother-child unit regarding the standard screening for pain, pressure ulcers and malnutrition. Hospital protocols require all newly admitted patients to be screened for these risks within 24 hours. The results of this screening must be recorded in the electronic patient file. Nurses from the mother-child unit believed that this method of risk screening did not contribute to the quality of care and asked whether this procedure could be disrupted and replaced by a more meaningful registration.</p></sec><sec><st>Assessment of Problem and Causes</st><p>To investigate whether we could abolish standard scoring while maintaining the quality of care, a project group was formed. The project group consisted of the nursing safety officer, obstetric nurses, several quality advisors, a dietician and three managers. The project group investigated the risks associated with abolishing standard scoring and discussed how these risks could be overcome.</p></sec><sec><st>Intervention</st><p>We conducted a pilot on the mother-child unit by eliminating the standard scoring of pain, pressure ulcers and malnutrition, unless clinically indicated. The NANDA-NIC-NOC classification system was implemented to record nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes if needed.</p></sec><sec><st>Strategy for change</st><p>The intervention was introduced gradually over five months. We began by engaging all committees and governing bodies involved in the pain, decubitus, and SNAQ scoring processes, including nursing leaders and quality assurance teams. After a series of meetings and discussions, members of the project group unanimously supported the plan to eliminate standard scoring of these risks. Their endorsement was critical in ensuring smooth implementation and alignment across the entire mother-child ward. As a result, a pilot was started in October 2023.</p></sec><sec><st>Measurement of improvement</st><p>Surveys were conducted before and after the intervention to measure nursing staff satisfaction. A Likert scale was used to assess changes in job satisfaction and the reduction in administrative burden.</p></sec><sec><st>Involvement of patients</st><p>The removal of standard scoring significantly improved staff satisfaction without negatively affecting patient care. Patients reported that their care became more personalized, based on individual needs rather than routine checklists. Additional manual reviews of patient records revealed that NANDA-NIC-NOC was used when clinically indicated.</p></sec><sec><st>Effects of changes</st><p>First, a baseline survey was conducted among nurses who worked in the mother-child unit. Results showed that 71% of the nurses were dissatisfied with the current standard screening protocol. Three months after implementation of the intervention, we conducted a second survey among the same group of nurses. After implementation of the intervention, 88% of nurses indicated that they were satisfied with the screening method (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>). Additionally, nurses reported that their perceived level of autonomy increased from 42% to 90%. Finally, the balance between the registration burden and what it yields for the patient increased from 32% to 80%.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 101 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Survey results on nursing staff satisfaction</p></caption><link locator="101_F1"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Lessons Learned</st><p>Engaging staff from the beginning is crucial to the success of such interventions. In hindsight, we would invest more time in defining clear clinical criteria for when scoring is essential. Future challenges may include sustaining the change and ensuring nursing staff compliance with NANDA-NIC-NOC when clinically indicated.</p></sec><sec><st>Message for Others</st><p>Reducing unnecessary administrative tasks can greatly enhance nursing staff satisfaction without compromising the quality of patient care. This project serves as a potential model for other healthcare institutions seeking to streamline their processes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflicts of Interest</st><p>None declared. </p><p>No external funding was provided for this project.</p></sec><sec><st>Ethical Approval</st><p>No ethical approval was required, as no patient or personal data was involved.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lammers-Leemrijze, M., Vos, M., Lindert, A. t., Bos, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.101</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.101</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[101 Improving nursing staff satisfaction by abolishing the standard scoring of pain, pressure ulcers and malnutrition in pregnant, laboring and postpartum hospitalised women]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A72</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A73</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A74-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[102 Project description: the legal underpinning of mental health services across sectors - the case of Denmark]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A74-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>July 2022, a 23-year-old psychiatric patient opened fire in the Copenhagen area &lsquo;Fields&rsquo; indoor shopping mall killing 3 people. During the preceding 6 months, the patient had counseled 13 different healthcare- and social support providers. The Fields shooting episode is only one among many examples pointing to challenges in the provision of coordinated mental healthcare. Correspondingly, a recent governmental report underscores that there is a need for reconsidering how legislation might better support offering of coherent mental healthcare. Previous reports have repeatedly pointed toward incongruous regulation and conflicts between, e.g., social- and health legislation (see, e.g.,<sup>1&ndash;4</sup> ). Anyway, it remains to be clarified what are the problems and what would be pertinent solutions. Similar problems are known from other countries.<sup>5&ndash;7</sup> Challenges can be rooted in differences in the values underlying regulation.<sup>8</sup> Social legislation, may be more focused on supporting the general opportunities and rights of &lsquo;citizens&rsquo; in society, while psychiatry and health law is centered around treating &lsquo;disorder&rsquo; in the context of &lsquo;patients&rsquo; and their right to self-determination.<sup>9 10</sup>  </p><p>  <b>  <I>Project aim</I>:</b> To examine the regulation of procedures in mental health provision, including barriers and solutions at the intersection between mental health- and social law.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>The underlying values in psychiatry- and health law are examined and compared to values in social law (citizen autonomy, social &lsquo;responsibility&rsquo;, etc.). Legal dogmatic methods with systematic document analysis of current social law, health legislation, preparatory works, international law, and legal theory.</p></li><li><p>Comparison of mental health- and social regulation in some other countries exemplifying the Scandinavian welfare model, including Norway and representation of other European countries (e.g., the UK). The interface between social- and health regulation is described with examples (e.g. in relation to sick leave and support, communication, etc.).</p></li><li><p>Analysis of examples of health- and social legislation conflicts through examination of cases from e.g. complaint boards, and through input from collaborators across sectors (e.g. legislative gaps regarding citizens worsening towards permanently disabling psycho-social conditions). Reference is made to the role of conflicting values (cf. 1) and problem management in other countries<sup>2</sup> making careful suggestion for solutions.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Status</st><p>Funding applied.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Sundhedsstyrelsen. Fagligt opl&aelig;g til en 10-&aring;rsplan: bedre mental sundhed og en styrket indsats til mennesker med psykiske lidelser. 2022.</p></li><li><p>Alb&aelig;k J, Hvenegaard A, Aagaard J, Hastrup LH, and Kistrup K. [Sammenh&aelig;ng i tilbudene til psykisk syge &ndash; organisatorisk beskrivelse og &oslash;konomisk analyse af udvalgte danske eksempler]. Copenhagen: DSI (Dansk SundhedsInstitut); 2004.</p></li><li><p>Johansen K, Larsen J, and Nielsen A. [Tv&aelig;rsektorielt samarbejde i psykiatrien. Videns- og erfaringsopsamling]. Copenhagen; 2012.</p></li><li><p>Mandelid LJ. Kan aktivt opps&oslash;kende behandlingsteam &oslash;ke bredden i lokalbasert psykisk helsearbeid? Tidsskrift for psykisk helsearbeid. 2011;<b>7</b>(4):338&ndash;47.</p></li><li><p>Wormdahl I, Husum TL, Rugk&aring;sa J, Rise MB. Professionals&rsquo; perspectives on factors within primary mental health services that can affect pathways to involuntary psychiatric admissions.<I> Int J Ment Health Syst</I>. 2020;<b>14</b>(1):86.</p></li><li><p>Burns T, Catty J, White S, Clement S, Ellis G, Jones IR, <I>et al</I>. Continuity of care in mental health: understanding and measuring a complex phenomenon. <I>Psychological Medicine</I> 2009;<b>39</b>(2):313&ndash;23.</p></li><li><p>Puntis SR, Rugk&aring;sa J, Burns T. The association between continuity of care and readmission to hospital in patients with severe psychosis. <I>Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology</I> 2016;<b>51</b>(12):1633&ndash;43.</p></li><li><p>Rynning E, Arnardottir OM, Hartlev M, Aasen HS, Soini S. Recent developments in Nordic health law. <I>European Journal of Health Law</I> 2010;<b>17</b>(3):279&ndash;94.</p></li><li><p>Wiley LF. Health Law as Social Justice. <I>Cornell J Law Public Policy</I> 2014;<b>24</b>(1):47&ndash;105.</p></li><li><p>Nielsen T. [&AElig;ldre og ansatte er i klemme mellem to love]. Ritzau. 2023 6/2/2023.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Birkeland, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.102</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.102</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[102 Project description: the legal underpinning of mental health services across sectors - the case of Denmark]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A74</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A74</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A74-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[103 Stop - before life stops]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A74-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>In the Region of North Jutland, approximately 37% die in the hospital. Some of these deaths in hospital may be associated with acute admissions and/or overtreatment, where decisions about not to resuscitate and not to give life-prolonging treatment have not been made or communicated.</p><p>  <I>STOP &ndash; before life stops</I> is a cross-sectoral initiative where Health Cluster North (hospital, municipalities and GP) jointly develop the competencies of healthcare professionals so they can support patients in making timely decisions about the end of life, resuscitate and to avoid overtreatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We developed a method where over two thousand healthcare professionals from May to September 2023 could gain competencies to ensure the initiative</p><p>A training program for resource persons was developed based on a &lsquo;Train the Trainer&rsquo; concept (TTT). The TTT program is structured around 5 training themes. The first 4 themes ensure that the resource persons have the knowledge, skills, and competencies. Theme 5 supports the resource persons training locally, where they must train colleagues based on their professional level</p><p>To ensure continuous development of the initiative, work is underway to develop an automatic data monitoring of the treatment level in the patient record systems.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Healthcare professionals from Health Cluster North completed a 3 days TTT program, where they gained competencies to ensure the continuous local dissemination and anchoring of the initiative in Health Cluster North. The Program is based on the principle that selected staff are trained as instructors while simultaneously developing their own competencies for the initiative. After the program, the function of the resource persons is to train colleagues so that all healthcare professionals have the skills to ensure the initiative.</p><p>The first automatic data monitoring of activity registrations in the hospital was carried out from January 2023 to January 2024. The initiative was implemented in week 22, 2024 and therefore there is a period before implementation of the STOP OP initiative, and a period from June 2023 to January 2024, where resource persons have trained healthcare professionals locally to conduct the necessary conversation and documenting the decision. Comparing the data before and after the intervention, the median after implementation is higher (378/403.5). However, there are not yet enough data points to conclude a statistically significant difference.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Healthcare professionals across the Health Cluster North observe that more patients have a registered treatment level. Data supports this observation, and we continue to develop an automatic monitoring system to measure effectiveness and ensure retention across the healthcare sectors.</p><p>North Jutland Regional Hospital has developed a website stopop.dk. The website is accessible to patients, citizens and healthcare professionals and contains all the initiative&rsquo;s materials.</p><p>A cross-sectoral network for the resource persons is established to follow the initiative.</p></sec><sec><st>Lessons Learned</st><p>For an initiative across healthcare sectors with several thousand healthcare professionals, it has been valuable to develop a training program and subsequently ensure through network meetings that the resource persons meet and continue to ensure a common direction.</p><p>It has been of great importance that funds have been allocated for 2 project coordinators.</p><p>It has been a difficult task to gain access to automatic data monitoring for the handover of documentation across sectors where different patient record systems are used.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michno, C., Stilling, M., Haestrup, P., Pedersen, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.103</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.103</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[103 Stop - before life stops]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A74</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A75</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A79-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[107 Reducing delay to support patient flow; an innovative approach applying quality improvement]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A79-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Our intervention was hospital-wide, conducted as a &lsquo;spread and scale&rsquo; approach aiming to reducing patient delay across a large NHS teaching hospital in the Northwest of England, covering two sites and a population of 390,000 people.</p><p>Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (LTHTR) and Nordic Healthcare Group (NHG) attempted to reduce patient delay by applying the Theory of Constraints (ToC) to patient journeys, using innovative software to record delay and identify constraints.</p><p>There are many reasons why patients experience delay, however, there needs to be a way to identify the bottlenecks which are responsible and remove them. Prior to embarking on a partnership with NHG, LTHTR didn&rsquo;t have a data driven way to identify bottlenecks.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>Using an improvement science methodology to understand which bottlenecks were causing the main problems, LTHTR applied ToC. ToC is a concept which has been popularised in healthcare by Alex Knight, author of the book &lsquo;Pride and Joy&rsquo;. NHG have developed a set of processes enabled by software to support organisations to deploy the core principles. Software named &lsquo;Flowful&rsquo; allowed LTHTR to quantify how many days were lost to delay per patients, for specific tasks which were &lsquo;outstanding&rsquo;. Using this data, across a small cohort of wards, LTHTR could understand where to focus improvement support to greatest effect.</p><p>Staff groups were consulted in their professional groups and asked if they would test the software as a trial. Using spread and scale techniques, data was analysed and results shared across the participating wards and management forums.</p><p>Using innovative software, the change to practice was for clinical teams to register all planned discharge dates (PDD) and associated tasks for each patient on the ward which were outstanding in their journey. Recording this information in such detail within Flowful enabled teams to quantify how many days were lost to delay once the task outstanding had surpassed the PDD. Centralised information on the top delayed patients was utilised in the daily bed meetings and using escalation principles to identify and resolve sources of delay expediting the time discharge of patients.</p><p>LTHTR used a &lsquo;spread and scale&rsquo; approach to iteratively test across 10 wards in a three-month period, then a further six wards in two-months across two hospital sites. Using pareto principles to understand the tightest constraint this enabled greater focus on the problem at unit level and organisational level. Staff were engaged by socialising Flowful at existing forums, known advocates of quality improvement where enlisted to commence testing. Weekly open development forums were available for staff to discuss results and improvements.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>LTHTR used time-series data, through Statistical Process Control charts to monitor change over time. This helped teams to understand the impact of their focussed improvement, using PDSA cycles to sequentially test ways to reduce patient delay. This allowed for sharing of good practice and build confidence in changes that were made.</p><p>Over a 12-month period, wards taking part in Flowful realised a 0.5-day reduction in length of stay (LOS) in comparison to non-Flowful wards. Flowful supported changes to quickly reduce delay, it was a catalyst for LTHTR to truly quantify, how much delay was in the system. It helped to identify three of the top constraints, subsequently forming a key focus for the organisation&rsquo;s strategy. Reducing LOS, leads to reducing harms, it provides better experiences of care in a more cost-effective way. Seasonal variation and other hospital initiatives made it difficult to demonstrate causation, though there is little doubt that the focus Flowful brought supported such outcomes.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clough, S., Groop, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.107</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.107</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[107 Reducing delay to support patient flow; an innovative approach applying quality improvement]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A79</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A79</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A79-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[108 Enhancing safety and person-centred care for people taking valproate]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A79-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>In 2020, the &lsquo;First Do No Harm&rsquo; report by Baroness Cumberlege highlighted the risks of fetal valproate exposure. Concurrently, MBRRACE-UK reported an increase in maternal deaths due to sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) following stricter valproate prescribing measures. In November 2023, the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) issued an alert requiring annual reviews for women of childbearing potential prescribed valproate, with a second specialist required to confirm continued appropriateness of the drug. A second specialist is also required to confirm initiation of valproate prescription. This policy, aimed at minimizing teratogenic risks, placed additional strain on neurology and mental health services, exacerbating existing clinical capacity issues.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>In June 2023, the South East (SE) Regional Clinical Quality Improvement (CQI) team conducted a regional review to enhance patient safety and person-centred care in valproate prescribing. A multidisciplinary stakeholder group&mdash;including Integrated Care Board (ICB) leads, medicines optimization specialists, clinicians, and patient representatives&mdash;was convened to assess challenges and co-develop solutions. Engagement strategies included webinars with national experts, consultations with patient groups, and focused discussions with clinicians and with individuals with learning disabilities and care providers.</p></sec><sec><st>Findings</st><p>Key challenges identified included limited clinical capacity for annual reviews, inefficient paper-based documentation of Annual Risk Acknowledgement Forms (ARAFs), and inadequate patient communication materials. A digital tool was developed and piloted in three NHS trusts to streamline review processes, improve information-sharing, and facilitate timely interventions. Additionally, accessible patient resources, including easy-read materials, translated into 30 languages, were co-produced with clinicians and service users to enhance informed decision-making. A logic model and benefits proposal were created to outline the expected impact of these interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Evaluation is ongoing, with preliminary data assessing ease of use, dashboard functionality, and scalability of the tool to other NHS trusts. The project website https://www.southeastclinicalnetworks.nhs.uk/our-networks/valproate/ received 5,000 unique visits within the first month of publishing patient resources. Key challenges include securing sustainable funding, ensuring information governance compliance, and addressing interoperability issues between NHS digital systems.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The introduction of enhanced valproate prescribing safeguards has significantly increased workload pressures on neurology and mental health services, with potential consequences for patient safety and waiting times. A regionally piloted digital tool shows promise in addressing workflow inefficiencies and improving patient engagement. Further evaluation will determine feasibility for broader implementation across other high-risk medications.</p></sec><sec><st>Further Reading</st><p>Cumberlege report 2020: First Do No Harm: First Do No Harm</p><p>MBRRACE report 2020: https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/news/2080-mbrrace-uk-report-identifies-epilepsy-and-inequalities-in-maternal-deaths</p><p>NICE CG217 January 2025: Epilepsies in children, young people and adults: Overview | Epilepsies in children, young people and adults | Guidance | NICE</p><p>2023 Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA): https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/valproate-safety-measures</p><p>Information leaflets for women and people of childbearing potential (and translations into 30 languages) 2025: NHS England South East Clinical Networks</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fishburn, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.108</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.108</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[108 Enhancing safety and person-centred care for people taking valproate]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A79</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A80</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A82-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[111 Redefining care from the bedside: the impact of patient leadership]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A82-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Despite decades of commitment to patient-centred care, healthcare systems continue to marginalise patient expertise in practice. Patients remain underrepresented in leadership roles, curriculum development, and research governance, undermining the ambition of inclusive and co-produced care. This disconnect reflects a persistent structural imbalance between clinical authority and lived experience. Patient leadership, where individuals with lived experience shape policy, education, and innovation, offers a strategic model to bridge this divide. This review synthesises evidence across three domains: medical education, health policy and research, and digital peer-to-peer engagement. It also critically explores structural barriers and proposes future directions for embedding patient leadership into healthcare systems.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This study undertook a thematic synthesis of eight purposively selected sources, including peer-reviewed journal articles, a policy report, a book chapter, and a longitudinal qualitative study. Literature was identified using targeted keyword searches, such as &lsquo;patient leadership,&rsquo; &lsquo;co-production,&rsquo; &lsquo;PPI in medical education,&rsquo; and &lsquo;digital health advocacy&rsquo;, drawing on academic databases and institutional publications. To contextualise developments in education, insights were integrated from Professor Dame Robina Shah, Director of the Doubleday Centre for Patient Experience. Sources were selected for their relevance to three domains: medical education, health policy and research, and peer-to-peer leadership via digital and entrepreneurial means. Thematic analysis was used to extract recurring patterns, challenges, and outcomes, with attention to system-level barriers and implications for sustainable integration of patient leadership.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In medical education, the Doubleday Centre&rsquo;s model of embedding patients as curriculum co-designers and institutional partners reframes them from passive contributors to co-educators. Shah emphasises that such integration supports relational learning and professional identity formation.<sup>1</sup> Birrell et al. report improved student empathy and system literacy when patients are positioned as active stakeholders.<sup>2</sup> However, challenges include limited compensation structures, variable institutional buy-in, and the absence of validated tools to assess educational impact.<sup>2 3</sup>  </p><p>In policy and research, patient leaders such as Patrick Ojeer have influenced national commissioning and research agendas, particularly in sickle cell disease. His co-authored work has shaped primary care guidance and contributed to NIHR-funded studies on care transition.<sup>4 5</sup> Despite this, patient leaders report enduring power asymmetries, emotional labour, and lack of protected time to contribute meaningfully.<sup>5 6</sup>  </p><p>Digital spaces have expanded peer-to-peer leadership. Michael Seres&rsquo; blog, &lsquo;Being a Patient Isn&rsquo;t Easy&rsquo;, catalysed a global community and inspired digital health innovations including 11Health, a patient-led company creating sensor-enabled ostomy bags.<sup>7 8</sup> His concept of the &lsquo;i-patient&rsquo; reflects a shift towards interactive, data-informed engagement. While impactful, Gilbert and Doughty note that institutional support for such digital initiatives remains fragmented.<sup>6</sup>  </p><p>Cross-domain themes include underinvestment in patient leadership, lack of formal development pathways, and tokenistic involvement. The King&rsquo;s Fund recommends investing in co-production training, patient-inclusive governance, and shared decision-making metrics.<sup>9</sup> Future directions should prioritise formal recognition of patient leaders, integration into workforce planning, and the use of patient-defined indicators in quality improvement. Scaling these models requires structural reform and sustained institutional commitment.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Shah R. Personal communication on patient leadership at the Doubleday Centre. 2024.</p></li><li><p>Birrell F, Johnson A, Scott L, <I>et al.</I> Educational collaboration can empower patients, support doctors in training and future-proof medical education. <I>Lifestyle Medicine</I> 2021;<b>2</b>:e49. doi: 10.1002/LIM2.49</p></li><li><p>Regan de Bere S, Nunn S. Towards a pedagogy for patient and public involvement in medical education. <I>Med Educ</I>. 2016;<b>50</b>:79&ndash;92. doi: 10.1111/MEDU.12880</p></li><li><p>Aljuburi G, Okoye O, Majeed A, <I>et al.</I> Views of patients about sickle cell disease management in primary care: a questionnaire-based pilot study. <I>JRSM Short Rep</I>. 2012;<b>3</b>:1&ndash;5. doi: 10.1258/SHORTS.2012.011173</p></li><li><p>Renedo A, Miles S, Chakravorty S, <I>et al.</I> Patient and public involvement. <I>Understanding the health-care experiences of people with sickle cell disorder transitioning from paediatric to adult services: This Sickle Cell Life, a longitudinal qualitative study.</I> Southampton: NIHR Journals Library 2020.</p></li><li><p>Gilbert D, Doughty M. The quiet revolutionaries: patient leaders | HSJ knowledge | Health Service Journal. Health Service Journal. 2013. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.hsj.co.uk/leadership/the-quiet-revolutionaries-patient-leaders/5054198.article</inter-ref> (accessed 23 March 2025)</p></li><li><p>Seres M. From patient to patient-entrepreneur: development of an ostomy bag sensor. <I>American Journal of Gastroenterology</I> 2018;<b>113</b>:8&ndash;10. doi: 10.1038/AJG.2017.260</p></li><li><p>Seres M. The Role of Social Media in Healthcare: Experiences of a Crohn&rsquo;s Disease Patient. In: Bali R, ed. <I>Rare Diseases in the Age of Health 2.0</I>. Berlin: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 2013:139&ndash;44.</p></li><li><p>Seale B. Patients as partners Building collaborative relationships among professionals, patients, carers and communities Leadership in action. London 2016.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kulimushi, C., Bhoorasingh, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.111</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.111</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[111 Redefining care from the bedside: the impact of patient leadership]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A82</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A82</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A82-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[112 Representation at the international forum of quality and safety in healthcare]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A82-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Health conferences provide opportunities highly beneficial for career development, knowledge exchange and networking.<sup>1</sup> Conference inequity has been shown in the literature with underrepresentation from low and middle income countries (LMICs).<sup>1</sup> Diverse geographical speaker representation could contribute to a more scientifically comprehensive range of topics, research results, and perceptions.<sup>2</sup> Underrepresentation of women has also been shown at various medical conferences, although this disparity is thought to be improving over time.<sup>2 3</sup> The International Forum of Quality and Safety (Forum) is a series of international conferences that aim to promote knowledge exchange for patient benefit, particularly through identifying global solutions to regional needs.<sup>4</sup> There has been progressive emphasis on patient participation and increasing ethnic diversity in recent forums. This study aims to audit the global distribution of speakers and representation of women speakers at the International Forum of Quality and Safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>All publicly available past programmes from the International Forum of Quality and Safety website were analysed (https://internationalforum.bmj.com/previous-forums/). Speakers and their affiliated country listed for oral sessions, workshops and presentations were collected by two auditors (RS and YR). Poster presenters' data were excluded as no complete data was publicly available. Similarly, online conferences were excluded due to incomplete speaker data on the website. Researchers also analysed publicly available speaker biographies to gather self-reported gender data if available. Data were analysed in Microsoft Excel. Global distribution of speakers and representation of women speakers were analysed over time as proportion of total speakers for each forum each year. Speaker data were gathered from 2016&ndash;2024 for 13 Forums, of which seven took place in Europe and six took place in Asia or Australia. Of the Europe based Forums, three took place the United Kingdom (UK), two in Sweden, one in the Netherlands and one in Denmark. Of the southern hemisphere Forums, three took place in Australia, one in Taiwan, one in Singapore and one in Malaysia.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>From all listed speakers across 13 Forums, over 70% of speakers were either from the UK, Australia, Sweden or USA, with the UK representing 35.6% of all speakers. Across the Europe-based Forums, 70% of speakers were from the UK, Sweden or USA, followed by the Netherlands and Denmark. Across the southern hemisphere Forums, over 70% of speakers were either from Australia, Singapore, the UK or USA, of which 41.5% speakers were from Australia.</p><p>Median number of speakers for the Europe based Forums was 192 (IQR: 188, 217). Median number of speakers for the Asia or Australia based Forums was 115.5 (IQR: 73.25, 120.75). Generally, countries hosting the Forum had higher speaker representation in that particular Forum in comparison to other countries. Overall, the Forum appears to have good representation from women speakers across all Forums from 2022&ndash;2024.</p><p>Data collection was limited to that which were publicly available. The listed affiliated country of each speaker does not indicate ethnicity of the speaker. More accurate methods of assessing diversity may include surveys administered at the time of registration.</p><p>This audit of speakers at the International Forum of Quality and Safety shows equal representation of women speakers but overrepresentation of speakers from high income countries. Further data is needed to understand distribution by culture and ethnicity and more accurate data would be needed to understand gender representation. Further investigation is required to understand barriers to participation of people from LMICs to the Forum. Data on diversity of poster presenters and attendees may also be useful to identify potential groups to engage further. Further investigation is needed on career stages of speakers, poster displayers and attendees.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflicts of interest to declare.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shenoy, R., Ravindran, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.112</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.112</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[112 Representation at the international forum of quality and safety in healthcare]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A82</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A83</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A84-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[114 A new instrument for assessment of qualify of care for regional comprehensive cancer networks]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A84-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>In the Netherlands ten regional comprehensive cancer networks (CCN) with a nationwide coverage organize high standard integral care for all cancer patients in regional cancer type care pathways. While quality assurance is well organized for Dutch hospitals and primary care, a quality system at the network level is lacking. Qualicor Europe and the Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization have risen to the challenge to develop an innovative quality network care assessment and system. Subsequently the instrument was peer reviewed by the project teams of two CCN &ndash; Longkankernet and OncoWest.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The project consisted of a phase to design the instrument and a testing phase of Action Learning in two CCN &ndash; Longkankernet and OncoWest.</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>In the design phase existing quality frameworks, guidelines and standards were analyzed and operationalized into a <unl>network quality instrument</unl>. This instrument consisted of a quantitative data report and a qualitative audit.</p></li><li><p>The <unl>network quality indicators</unl> included governance, patient care, research and innovation, professional education and quality of care.</p></li><li><p>Stakeholders e.g. CEO&rsquo;s and members of Patient Advisory Committees, physicians and members of Multi-Disciplinary Teams were interviewed in a <unl>pre-audit</unl>.</p></li><li><p>The <unl>qualitative audit</unl> consisted of a participatory integral patient journey (pathway) assessment in the hospitals by peer auditors and was coordinated by Qualicor Europe.</p></li><li><p>The Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization collected the <unl>quantitative data</unl> from the Dutch Cancer Registry and supplementary registries into a tailor-made data report.</p></li><li><p>The audit report and data report were discussed in an <unl>interdisciplinary dialogue session </unl>with the CCN to identify the networks&rsquo; quality gaps and the short and long term improvement plan.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The main findings of the project are:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Assessment of the quality of a CCN is possible, within a realistic timeframe and with an acceptable effort of the network.</p></li><li><p>The assessment gives an indication of the functioning of the network and possibilities for improvement. In the future, benchmark of networks will be possible.</p></li><li><p>It is important in advance to think about the way improvements can be made and how the PDSA cycle can be completed.</p></li><li><p>The design of a network &ndash; bottom-up or to-down &ndash; makes a difference in how fast and successful improvements can be realized.</p></li><li><p>Standardization of care is important at multicenter care as well as well-designed Multi-Disciplinary Teams</p></li></l></p><p>Currently, both CCN are working on prioritized improvement projects such as focus groups with patients, optimizing Multi-Disciplinary Teams and palliative care, and better use of data for improvement. Qualicor Europe and the Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization have finalized and optimized the instrument.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heide, H. v. d., Koolen, N., Gijsen, B., Kroon, C. d., Mierlo, R. v.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.114</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.114</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[114 A new instrument for assessment of qualify of care for regional comprehensive cancer networks]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A84</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A84</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A84-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[115 Building a safer future: a framework for enhancing patient safety in digital start-up mental health services across Europe]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A84-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><p>This Framework was developed in partnership between Mindler&rsquo;s Global Clinical Governance Department and Verita. Mindler is a primary care digital mental health company operating in five European markets. Verita is an independent organisation specialising in healthcare consultancy and investigative work in the UK.</p></sec><sec><st>Problem</st><p>There are an increasing number of online e-mental health companies on the European market. Often these are unregulated and independent of public healthcare. There is a lack of research on, and guidance for, such companies on how to set up a patient safety infrastructure within their organisation, beyond GDPR/data security. This may affect patient care quality and safety. A technology or a product, no matter how advanced, is not a complete healthcare service. AI is a promising, emerging area however we are in a transition period between theory/exploration and established daily clinical and safety practices. There is a clear need for a patient safety infrastructure Minimum Viable Product (MVP) for emerging e-mental health companies that often begin small and scale with limited resources.</p><p>Assessment of Problem and Analysis of its Causes</p><p>The extent of the challenge is known through literature searches, consultation, and direct professional experience of the lack of guidance for such companies, which would traditionally come from e.g. regulating bodies/governments. Often startups look to expand into new markets but have little guidance on how to navigate patient safety when different European countries have a variety of clinical expectations.</p></sec><sec><st>Intervention</st><p>Concept e-meetings, living e-documents, European (e.g. Inspectie Gezondheidszorg en Jeugd, 2023; NHS England, 2022; Socialstyrelsen, 2020) and WHO healthcare policy (e.g. World Health Organisation, 2018; 2021) and literature searches were utilised. The Framework is a service-planning and maturity discussion tool. Established Frameworks e.g. Blueprint For Action (Patient Safety Learning, 2019) support this. Consultation took place with e-health leaders. Dissemination is through professional forums.</p></sec><sec><st>Strategy for Change</st><p>At minimum, a licensed clinician should lead on Framework implementation.</p></sec><sec><st>The MVP areas are</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>  <b>Patient-Centred Design</b>  </p><p><l type="circle"><li><p>Co-creating services/products with patients: integrating insights to shape safe, effective care.</p></li></l></p></li><li><p>  <b>Leadership-Led Safety</b>  </p><p><l type="circle"><li><p>Setting the tone from the top: a Just Culture driven by leadership with patient voices at the forefront.</p></li></l></p></li><li><p>  <b>Quality through Assurance</b>  </p><p><l type="circle"><li><p>Defining quality: measuring outcomes, workforce excellence, safety benchmarks, critical human oversight of digital/AI tools.</p></li></l></p></li><li><p>  <b>Proactive Risk Management</b>  </p><p><l type="circle"><li><p>Staying ahead of risks: standardised protocols and clear escalation pathways.</p></li></l></p></li><li><p>  <b>Learning from Every Challenge</b>  </p><p><l type="circle"><li><p>Growth through reflection: turning incidents and complaints into actionable insights.</p></li></l></p></li><li><p>  <b>Gold Standard Clinical Record-Keeping</b>  </p><p><l type="circle"><li><p>Setting the bar: ensuring clinical records support safety, quality and accountability.</p></li></l></p></li><li><p>  <b>Culture of Open Feedback</b>  </p><p><l type="circle"><li><p>Building trust through transparency: fostering open communication and feedback to drive continuous improvement.</p></li></l></p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Measurement of Improvement</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>As the Framework would be implemented at initial service design there may be an absence of baseline data to measure success against. Benchmarking against other start-ups is a challenge due to lack of reference data.</p></li><li><p>The Framework offers guidance on how the organisation can set their own benchmarks, asking the questions: How will we know this is working? How will we check?</p></li><li><p>Benchmarks include: Patient feedback, incident reporting quality, safety discussions moving from blame to system.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Effects of Changes</st><p>We anticipate using this Framework will guide start-up leaders to understand what to resource and implement, provide a safety reflection tool and bring benefits to patient safety and care. A potential area of challenge is centering safety in business plans, budgeting, investor pitches and drives to profitability. We argue that safe care is fundamental to achieving financial and commercial success.</p></sec><sec><st>Lessons Learned</st><p>Our work is in progress. Learnings so far are:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>The value of this tool to those consulted.</p></li><li><p>The severe lack of guidance on what a MVP patient safety infrastructure can look like for start-ups and the lack of reference data from other services.</p></li><li><p>Just as we would expect organisations to continue to adapt through learnings, this Framework is also open to adaptation as the safety field and AI advances.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Messages for Others</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>This is a safety bare minimum and can easily be implemented from the start within a streamlined service.</p></li><li><p>Put the patient at the centre of safety design, not the tech or product. Always consider, &lsquo;what would the patient think about this?&rsquo;</p></li><li><p>Understand that safety is multifaceted, systemic and needs to be considered wider than clinician responsibility and something that only exists in clinical contacts.</p></li><li><p>Safe care should be key to investment or profitability.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Ethics Approval</st><p>None required</p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Patient Safety Learning (2019). <I>The Patient-Safe Future: Blueprint for Action.</I> Retrieved from: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://d2z1laakrytay6.cloudfront.net/content/A-Blueprint-for-Action-240619.pdf</inter-ref>  </p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jones, S., Marsden, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.115</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.115</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[115 Building a safer future: a framework for enhancing patient safety in digital start-up mental health services across Europe]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A84</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A85</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A89-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[120 Stepping towards success: enhancing outcomes for outpatient antibiotic therapy in diabetic foot infection]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A89-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Diabetic foot infection (DFI) poses a significant challenge amidst the rising diabetes epidemic (Diabetes UK, 2021). A retrospective audit at Ashford and St Peter&rsquo;s Hospital revealed concerns over local performance compared to national outcomes (BSAC, 2022) and prolonged IV antibiotic courses among 59 patients receiving outpatient parenteral antibiotic treatment (OPAT) for DFI between August 2021 and August 2023. The audit identified extended IV antibiotic courses (&gt;6 weeks in 44% and &gt;14 weeks in 10%), high adverse effect rates (36%), limited cure rates (27%), frequent but often delayed surgical interventions (amputation/debridement 21%), inadequate specialist review during OPAT (70%), and high readmission rates (32%) <unl>(</unl>Eleftheriadou <I>et al</I>, 2024). In response, a multidisciplinary diabetic foot team initiated a change by refining referral pathways, facilitating early oral therapy transition, and establishing a post-discharge diabetic foot clinic.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim</st><p>This study aims to assess the clinical outcomes of patients with DFI, treated with OPAT, following the intervention at Ashford and St Peter&rsquo;s Hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Methodology</st><p>Prospective analysis on adult patients with DFI, receiving OPAT, post-intervention, utilizing standardized parameters from the initial audit.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A cohort of 114 patients was treated between February 2024 and February 2025. The average patient age was 67 years (range: 36 to 92 years). All patients were reviewed by a consultant endocrinologist and podiatrist. Key findings include:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>A 30% reduction in the duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy exceeding 6 weeks.</p></li><li><p>A 28% reduction in the incidence of adverse drug events associated with antibiotic treatment.</p></li><li><p>A 15% increase in the number of patients receiving debridement interventions, attributed to enhanced input from the specialist podiatry team.</p></li><li><p>A 21% reduction in the rate of amputation outcomes among patients with diabetic foot infections.</p></li><li><p>A significant reduction in referral waiting times, with a decrease from 8 weeks to immediate access (0 weeks) for clinic evaluation and treatment.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Our findings emphasize the success of a multidisciplinary approach and appropriate resource allocation in managing DFI. Early OPAT reviews and timely surgical referrals led to shorter antibiotic courses, fewer adverse events, and reduced amputation rates. Prolonged OPAT courses did not improve outcomes and were linked to higher adverse events, underscoring the importance of regular reviews to ensure treatment effectiveness and patient safety. This is consistent with studies supporting the early switch to oral antibiotics. (Talan <I>et al</I>., 2019; Luntamo <I>et al</I>., 2019; Baddour <I>et al</I>., 2007).</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Diabetes UK. (2021). 1 in 10 adults living with diabetes by 2030. Available at: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.diabetes.org.uk/about-us/news-and-views/1-10-adults-living-diabetes-2030</inter-ref> (Accessed: 23 March 2025).</p></li><li><p>British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC). Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in the UK: findings from the BSAC national outcomes registry (2015&ndash;19). <I>Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy</I> 2022;<b>77</b>(5):1481&ndash;1490. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac047. PMID: 35187565</p></li><li><p>Eleftheriadou A, <I>et al</I>. Outpatient antibiotic treatment outcomes in diabetic foot infection. <I>The Physician</I> 2024;<b>9</b>(1):40. doi: 10.38192/1.9.1.1</p></li><li><p>Talan DA, <I>et al</I>. Oral versus intravenous antibiotics for bone and joint infection. <I>New England Journal of Medicine</I> 2019;<b>380</b>(5):425&ndash;436. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1710926. PMID: 30699315; PMCID: PMC6522347</p></li><li><p>Luntamo M, <I>et al</I>. From &lsquo;OPAT&rsquo; to &lsquo;COpAT&rsquo;: implications of the OVIVA study for ambulatory management of bone and joint infection. <I>Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy</I> 2019;<b>74</b>(8):2119&ndash;2121. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz122. PMID: 30989175</p></li><li><p>Baddour LM, <I>et al</I>. Oral step-down therapy is comparable to intravenous therapy for Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis. <I>Journal of Infection</I> 2007;<b>54</b>(6):539&ndash;544. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2006.11.011. Epub 2007 Jan 2. PMID: 17198732</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bajaj, K., Greensmith, S., Parsons, C., Rayapati, A., Sharma, M., Eleftheriadou, A., Das, G., Ritchie, L., Unnithan, A., Masucci, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.120</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.120</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[120 Stepping towards success: enhancing outcomes for outpatient antibiotic therapy in diabetic foot infection]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A89</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A89</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A89-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[121 Enhancing data utilization through data for improvement visualization. Learnings from Ethekwini district, KwaZulu-Natal. South Africa]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A89-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>eThekwini Health District encompasses the Durban Metropolitan area KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa. Its population experiences many health challenges, including high HIV/AIDS and Tuberculosis (TB) prevalence. To enhance healthcare delivery capabilities, the district collaborates with partners such as non-governmental organizations (NGOs), international agencies, community-based organizations and private sector. To achieve improved service delivery and health outcomes, the district has adopted the Operation Phuthuma (OP) Nerve Centre (NC) Approach as its problem-solving strategy.<sup>1</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>In the effort to enhance data utilization through data for improvement,<sup>2</sup> the eThekwini district took strides to harness power of health information through the innovative data visualization techniques, which includes:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>The use of interactive indicator data dashboards to view performance snapshots at a glance.</p></li><li><p>Data visualization translation of complex or aggregated indicator data into detailed analysis for targeted interventions.</p></li><li><p>Visualization of the median to measure performance metrics of priority indicators.</p></li><li><p>Use of the TROA gauge to identify and schedule supportive supervision to facilities that require more support.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Since the adoption of the data for improvement data visualization methods, there has been a remarkable shift in the eThekwini District overall TROA, this is justified by an upward shift in the median from 494742, before the first aligned nerve centre in February 2024 to 495035 by August 2024. Furthermore, with the targeted and data-driven supportive supervision to the below site levels, the district has also noted a significant increase in the overall TROA from the Focus Facilities (Tongaat CHC, Hlengisizwe CHC, Cato Manor &amp; KwaDabeka CHC).</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 121 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Run chart illustrating eThekwini district TROA data for January 2023 &ndash; August 2024</p></caption><link locator="121_F1"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 121 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Run chart illustrating eThekwini district focus facilities (Tongaat CHC, Hlengisizwe CHC, Cato Manor &amp; KwaDabeka CHC) TROA data for January 2023 &ndash; August 2024</p></caption><link locator="121_F2"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Lessons Learned</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>This alignment encompasses rigorous routine monitoring and technical support from which the district has highlighted the significance of implementing the component of &lsquo;data for improvement&rsquo; visualisations.</p></li><li><p>Data visualization has improved the district&rsquo;s data analysis capabilities, driven improvement initiatives, and enabled identification of health information and data systems gaps as a drivers of programme excellence</p></li><li><p>Data visualisation has enabled the district to be data-driven in decision making, stakeholder engagements and execution of its nerve centre meetings.</p></li><li><p>eThekwini District stakeholders are now actively monitoring indicator progress through performance reviews and shaping strategies that effectively respond to gaps evidenced through data for improvement utilization.</p></li><li><p>The implementation of the Operation Phuthuma Nerve Centre Approach in eThekwini District has highlighted the utility of &lsquo;data for improvement&rsquo; in healthcare services as a quality improvement methodology.</p></li><li><p>The approach is essential in fostering sustainable improvement in the districts through specific and effective health system and care delivery interventions.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Cathy Green, Lauren de Kock. (2019). <I>How To Guide Quality Improvement Guide. Aurum Institute. https://www.auruminstitute.org/component/edocman/continuous-quality-and-improvement</I>  </p></li><li><p>National Department of Health. (2022).<I> Operation Phuthuma Nerve Centre Handbook Version 2.</I> South Africa</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sizwe, M., Zanele, N., Thela, S., Ngcobo, A., Matlala, M., Mdaka, N., Kock, L. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.121</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.121</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[121 Enhancing data utilization through data for improvement visualization. Learnings from Ethekwini district, KwaZulu-Natal. South Africa]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A89</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A90</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A91-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[122 Developing a clinical pathway in gynaecologic oncology - the 'vivapathway GT]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A91-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Standardising clinical processes is essential for improving quality and patient safety in complex healthcare settings. Clinical pathways (CPWs) provide a structured, evidence-based approach to ensure continuity and transparency of care. Nevertheless, many hospitals still rely on informal experience-based routines. At Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, a large tertiary care hospital in Berlin, the care for patients with gynaecologic tumours followed an implicit pathway. With the upcoming oncology centre certification, the hospital initiated the development of an explicit CPW.</p></sec><sec><st>Research Question</st><p>How can an implicit clinical process in gynaecologic oncology be translated into an explicit, evidence-based pathway that aligns with legal mandates, certification requirements and supports interprofessional collaboration?</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A participatory, qualitative approach was applied. Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with professionals from all disciplines involved in the care of patients with gynaecologic tumours. The interviews were analysed using Mayring&rsquo;s qualitative content analysis. The identified steps of the implicit pathway were combined with certification criteria, legal obligations, and clinical guidelines. In a series of interprofessional quality circles, the findings were discussed, refined, and finalised into a structured, explicit CPW. The pathway was mapped to the 7-phase model of the European Pathway Association to support transparency and replicability.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The implicit 14-step pathway was formalised into a 26-step explicit CPW, &lsquo;VivaPathway GT&rsquo;. The new structure incorporates binding legal and external requirements and ensures active participation of all professional groups involved. It was integrated into hospital systems, staff training and quality workflows. An evaluation is scheduled after two years.</p><p>This project illustrates how implicit, experience-based clinical routines can be systematically transformed into explicit, standardised pathways using interprofessional methods and structured frameworks. The approach aligns internal processes with external requirements and certification demands. Key enablers were stakeholder engagement, transparency, and shared ownership. Challenges such as limited IT infrastructure and insufficient dedicated resources reflect common barriers across healthcare settings.</p><p>The VivaPathway GT serves as a transferable model for institutions aiming to improve care quality, strengthen interprofessional collaboration, and prepare for certification. It underlines the strategic value of CPWs for institutional learning, risk management, and quality development. This project also demonstrates the need for policy-level incentives and robust digital support to sustainably implement and evaluate complex clinical standards.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bu&#x0308;scher, A., Reinhold, N., Kugler, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.122</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.122</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[122 Developing a clinical pathway in gynaecologic oncology - the 'vivapathway GT]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A91</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A91</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A91-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[123 How can we use QI suggestions from patient having negative experiences - results from a survey at a Danish maternity ward?]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A91-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Though Denmark is a safe country to give birth, women still file complaints concerning their birth experience. We now that only few file complaints, but that unfortunate incidences occurs without being reported. There seem to exist a dark figure of unfortunate incidences never reported. These un-reported incidences could contain relevant patient experienced information that would be useful for quality improvement (QI). There might patterns of interest in the un-reported incidences, as it has been shown in complaint cases.<sup>1</sup> Further, these patient experiences could give birth to suggestions on QI areas. Therefore, this study investigates how these suggestions can be used for QI at the hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>To uncover the dark figure of unfortunate incidences, we conducted a survey using the Healthcare Complaint Analysis Tool taxonomy<sup>2</sup> among women giving birth in 2022 at the maternity ward Odense University Hospital, a larger public university hospital in Denmark that annually delivers approximately 4700 births. From patient records, we retrieved 3081 unique person identification number to send a questionnaire to patients&rsquo; individual electronic mailbox. We asked them if they had had a negative experience during childbirth. If so, they were ask to fill a questionnaire, but more important they were asked to write QI suggestions to encounter this experience. The access the medical records was approved by the Region of Southern Denmark (Journal no. 23/10824). We had approval to store and handle data (23/10902)</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We had a response rate of 33.2% (1022). Of those 32.9% (336) had a negative experience during childbirth. Among the women reporting a negative incidence we received 393 meaningful suggestions for QI. We thematised the suggestions with an empirical testing thematic approach and ended up with a series of themes that covers different aspects within QI. The most frequent themes were suggestions to improve patient relations by listening to patient voices and allocating time for patient care. The categorised feedback is presented at improvement workshops at the maternity ward. After the workshops QI initiatives will be launched and the survey will be repeated in 2026 to measure if numbers and proportions of dark figures have changed, but more importantly if there is a shift in the categories of experienced incidents and the written QI suggestions.</p></sec><sec><st>Discussion</st><p>All data in the study is purely based on un-edited patient reported data. At the hospital, patient involvement it is a spoken vision, and the hospital is routinely conducting improvement workshop based on pre-defined value streams.</p><p>Systematisation and quantification of patient complaints and unfortunate experiences is only sparsely used. This study contributes to QI based on patient input in contrast to most QI initiatives, which is clinician driven or based on clinician reported adverse events. When systemizing this patient reported data this could potentially be a fruitful source for QI. QI based on experiences from patients will help targeting specific initiatives suggested by patients.</p><p>We find that the patient suggestions is a valid and useful data source for QI and we will learn how clinicians will perceive patient suggestions for QI. The future QI initiatives will be evaluated by repeated measurement.</p><p>The authors are all employed at Odense University Hospital. The authors have no competing interests.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Walloe S, <I>et al.</I> Using complaints from obstetric care for improving women&rsquo;s birth experiences - a cross sectional study<I>. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth</I> 2023;<b>23</b>(1):705.</p></li><li><p>Gillespie A, Reader TW. The healthcare complaints analysis tool: development and reliability testing of a method for service monitoring and organisational learning. <I>BMJ Qual Saf.</I> 2016;<b>25</b>(12):937&ndash;946.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morso, L., Clausen, M. K., Bogh, S. B., Birkeland, S. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.123</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.123</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[123 How can we use QI suggestions from patient having negative experiences - results from a survey at a Danish maternity ward?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A91</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A92</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A94-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[125 Time for a quick call? Efficacy of telephone reviews in reducing opioid prescriptions for non-palliative primary care patients]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A94-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Long-term prescription of opioids for management of chronic pain in primary care has increased significantly in the UK (Bailey <I>et al</I>., 2022). There is little evidence to support the effectiveness of opioids in managing chronic pain (Chou <I>et al.</I>, 2022). Furthermore, longer periods of time on opioid prescriptions have detrimental effects (Bedson <I>et al</I>., 2019).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim</st><p>To achieve a reduction in the prescription of opioids in non-palliative patients living with long-term chronic pain.</p><p>This Quality Improvement (QI) project was conducted in a primary care practice with a comparatively higher than average prescriber rate of high-strength opioids for chronic pain.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We introduced multiple Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) cycles, including computer system notifications, opioid reduction telephone reviews, and communication with practice staff to ensure continuation of the project. Computer system prompts created awareness among staff who had engagement with the patients. Telephone reviews with patients evaluated their daily management of pain, provided education on the side effects and inefficacy of long-term opioid use.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>86% of patients reduced their daily dose of Tapentadol after one telephone consultation. 75% of patients reduced their daily dose of Fentanyl after one telephone consultation. Telephone consultations observed a measurable reduction in opioid prescriptions of non-palliative patients living with chronic pain in primary care.</p></sec><sec><st>Impact</st><p>This project found telephone reviews to be effective in reducing opioid prescriptions in primary care. Opioid reduction was also enhanced by the other cycle outcomes including computer system notifications and communication of the programme aims with practice staff.</p></sec><sec><st>Outcome</st><p>Positive elements of this intervention include successful reduction of long-term opiate burden, and building patient rapport. Obstacles encountered include patient resistance to opioid reduction and short project timeline. Chronic pain is a multi-factorial symptom, and this simple telephone consultation intervention enables a foundation to build a rapport with patients, guides management for this complex symptom, which in turn reduces the harmful risks associated with long-term opioid prescriptions.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Bailey J, Gill S, and Poole R. Long-term, high-dose opioid prescription for chronic non-cancer pain in primary care: an observational study. <I>BJGP open.</I> 2022;<b>6</b>(4).</p></li><li><p>Bedson J, Chen Y, Ashworth J, Hayward RA, Dunn KM, and Jordan KP. Risk of adverse events in patients prescribed long-term opioids: a cohort study in the UK clinical practice research Datalink. <I>European Journal of Pain</I> 2019;<b>23</b>(5):908&ndash;922.</p></li><li><p>Chou R, Selph S, Wagner J, Ahmed AY, Jungbauer R, Mauer K, Shetty KD, Yu Y, and Fu R. 2022. Systematic Review on Opioid Treatments for Chronic Pain: Surveillance Report 3. <I>Systematic Review on Opioid Treatments for Chronic Pain: Surveillance Reports</I>.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gaffney, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.125</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.125</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[125 Time for a quick call? Efficacy of telephone reviews in reducing opioid prescriptions for non-palliative primary care patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A94</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A94</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A94-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[126 Pocket compendium for children care - safer healthcare staff provides safer care for the children]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A94-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The childrens clinic in Region Kalmar Sweden, provides advanced pediatric care for children between the ages of 0&ndash;18 years and for all type of children, neonatal, medical, ENT, BUP, surgical and orthopedic conditions. This means that its a lot of different elements where highly specialized knowledge is needed. Easy and quick help formulas and knowledge close at hand make it easier to be able to take care of all children regardless of age and provide the same conditions to receive equal care regardless age, which also increases the safety for the patient.</p><p>There&rsquo;s plenty of well working cheat sheets that already exist, but in an emergency situation or when you&rsquo;re in need of the information quickly, it can be difficult to find the right information quickly enough and looking for it digitally can and will also take time.</p><p>Every child is unique, and they will differ in age and weight and it&rsquo;s difficult to always have all the different formulas and methods in mind. All children have the right to safe and equal care. Through a pocket compendium where all professions have the same access to routines and aids close at hand, this contributes to all children receiving the same care, which increases patient safety. Everything does not have to be done digitally, but there must be something close at hand that cannot be shut down in the middle of an emergency.</p><p>This book is for all professions that care for children, which provides safer, fair and equal care.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The need to increase the availability of useful information to all work professionals caring for children. The routines and PMs that were deemed important are included and compress in the compendium (see <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figures 1</cross-ref> and <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">2</cross-ref>). The emergency situations at the front, then ward-specific around children and neonatal. The compendium ended with clinic related routines such as hygiene routines and important telephone numbers. After the final correction, the compendium was sent to the printer to make sure of regarding materials, size and colors.</p><p>When the book was ready, it was distributed to all staff, regardless profession, that cared for children at the childrens clinic.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 126 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Exempel from the pocket compendium 1</p></caption><link locator="126_F1"></fig></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 126 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Exempel from the pocket compendium 2</p></caption><link locator="126_F2"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>By constantly checking deviations, we can see an improvement in the work around children. Deviations in various parts have been improved. The book is evaluated annually, where measurements and analyses that improvements and changes must be made to develop the book forward.</p><p>This project is an ongoing work, because work routines and labour laws are constantly changing. Which leads to the book constantly needing to be updated, but with limitations on budget and environment.</p><p>It took some time for the staff to understand and use the compendium in daily basis, which delayed the direct changes. But when the spread in the clinic increased, the difference was noticed in the measurements. Now after four years its spread in the clinic, the region, and also in other departments around Sweden, which has led to increased security and knowledge about care in children. Safer healthcare staff provides safer care for the children.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sjo&#x0308;gren, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.126</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.126</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[126 Pocket compendium for children care - safer healthcare staff provides safer care for the children]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A94</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A95</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A97-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[129 Exploring non-pharmacological interventions in patients recovery - reducing delirium and length of stay in post-operative fragility neck of femur fracture]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A97-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>A well-documented complication of surgery in elderly patients is delirium, especially in elderly patients undergoing surgery for fragility neck of femur fractures.<sup>1</sup> Acute confusional state, delirium, impairs cognitive function and is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, prolonged hospital stays, and increased rates of rehospitalisation.<sup>2</sup> Delirium affects between 18 and 35 percent of hospitalised elderly patients.<sup>3</sup> The onset of the syndrome is usually multifactorial, including postoperative pain, infections, dehydration, polypharmacy, and environmental disorientation, which leads to poor patient outcomes, including longer hospital stays, cognitive decline and increased mortality rates.<sup>4</sup> The condition is also a heavy burden on the health systems, in particular, geriatric care, where it is necessary to manage both physical and cognitive recovery.<sup>5</sup>  </p><p>Several studies have shown that nonpharmacological interventions reduce delirium rates in elderly populations. In a landmark study, Inouye and colleagues showed a multicomponent intervention strategy including mobility promotion, hydration and an environment characterised by a calm and oriented status could substantially reduce delirium by up to 30%. The literature identified non-pharmacological approaches as being best practice, but in this hospital&rsquo;s orthogeriatric wards, these were not routinely used, as there were no standardised procedures and no staff training.</p><p>A set of structured non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) was introduced in May 2024, including daily orientation, hydration and nutrition support, mobility promotion and sleep hygiene. This approach was guided by the mnemonic &lsquo;PINCH ME,&rsquo;.</p><p>The purpose of this Quality Improvement Project (QIP) was to decrease the incidence of delirium, as well as decrease the length of stay (LOS) in patients over the age of 81, through the implementation of non-pharmacological interventions (NPI).</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>The project was carried out in a district general hospital in three wards caring for patients with neck of femur fractures under orthogeriatric care. The incidence of delirium and LOS were retrospectively collected comparing April 2024 (pre-intervention) to June and July 2024 (post-intervention). Interventions were monitored and refined using a PDSA (Plan Do Study Act) cycle.</p><p>Baseline data collected in April 2024 revealed that 16 of 39 patients (41.03%) developed postoperative delirium, with an average LOS of 23.05 days.</p><p>Non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) were introduced in May 2024, including daily orientation, hydration and nutrition support, mobility promotion and sleep hygiene. Daily documentation was done to ensure consistency and process mapping. Later, documentation of the multidisciplinary team, including physicians, nurses and physiotherapists, was assessed with a focus on NPI, which could be a part of routine care.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 129 Table 1</no><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Metric</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>April (Pre- intervention)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>June &amp; July (Post- intervention)</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="3" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Delirium </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">41/03% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">30.53% </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Length of stay </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">23.05 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">16.99 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">NPI adherence </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Not tracked </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">40.43 (June) 83% (July) </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p>From April through July 2024, 134 patients were included in the QIP. The incidence of delirium in April 2024 was 41.03% with an average LOS of 23.05 days before the NPI.</p><p>Following NPI in May 2024, the incidence of delirium decreased at an average of 30.53% and LOS decreased by an average of 16.99 days in June and July 2024. The interventions also contributed to the timing of the adherence to NPIs, which increased from 40.43% in June to 83.33% in July <cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>This QIP proved that non-pharmacologic interventions can greatly reduce delirium and shorten the length of stay in elderly patients with fragility fractures. This data shows that high adherence to NPIs through ongoing staff education and monitoring can help increase patient outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Koizia LJ, <I>et al</I>. Delirium after emergency hip surgery-common and serious, but rarely consented for<I>. World Journal of Orthopedics</I> 2019;<b>10</b>(6):228.</p></li><li><p>Goldberg TE, <I>et al.</I> Association of delirium with long-term cognitive decline: a meta-analysis<I>. JAMA neurology.</I> 2020;<b>77</b>(11):1373&ndash;1381.</p></li><li><p>Fuchs S, <I>et al.</I> Delirium in elderly patients: prospective prevalence across hospital services. <I>General hospital psychiatry</I> 2020;<b>67</b>:19&ndash;25.</p></li><li><p>Hshieh TT, Inouye SK, and Oh ES. Delirium in the elderly<I>. Psychiatric Clinics</I> 2018;<b>41</b>(1):1&ndash;17.</p></li><li><p>Fogg C, <I>et al.</I> Hospital outcomes of older people with cognitive impairment: an integrative review. <I>International journal of geriatric psychiatry</I> 2018;<b>33</b>(9):1177&ndash;1197.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gulraiz, M., Ahmed, M., Akeru, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.129</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.129</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[129 Exploring non-pharmacological interventions in patients recovery - reducing delirium and length of stay in post-operative fragility neck of femur fracture]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A97</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A97</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A97-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[130 Developmental screening workflow implementation at a primary care clinic]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A97-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>This work was conducted in one outpatient primary care clinic in Shreveport, Louisiana. The Shreveport-Bossier City metropolitan area in Louisiana is one of the twenty-three U.S. metro areas where more than one in five people live below the poverty line (Data USA). Studies have shown that exposure to extreme poverty in early childhood is a risk factor for developmental delay (Lee <I>et al</I>, 2012).</p><p>Empirical literature on clinical guidelines for developmental delay screening in the primary care is varying and evasive to guide the Family Medicine Physician (Mackrides and Ryherd, 2011). Rydz <I>et al.</I> (2006) found that only 23% of primary care clinicians admit to using standardized screening tools in Well-Child Visits. One study revealed that the unaided physician impression would have missed 45 percent of children suitable for early intervention (Aylward, 2009). Time constraints and unequal distribution of screenings tools have been cited as barriers to screening (Rydz <I>et al.,</I> 2006; Mackrides and Ryherd, 2011).</p><p>As presented by Guo <I>et al.</I> (2017), simplifying Electronic Health Record (EHR) workflows has the potential of reducing burnout and increasing job satisfaction among physicians. Therefore, this work aimed to implement interventions to reduce the amount of time spent by the physician on the EHR when completing a Well-Child Visit where a validated developmental screening was performed/documented and also aimed to increase the rate of developmental delay detection.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We first retrospectively analysed the Well-Child Visits performed in patients &lt; age 4 in a period of one year (from May 1, 2022 to April 30, 2023). The Survey of Well-Being of Young Children (SWYC) was then elected as the standardized developmental screening to be applied in all Well-Child Visits in our clinic for children &lt; age 4. A workflow was created with instructions on how to apply the screening and how to interpret its scoring. The workflow also had information on the steps involved in referring children to the Early-Steps Program in Louisiana. The front desk staff, medical assistants, and providers were educated and trained. SWYC forms and scoring cheat sheets were printed and available in all nursing pods in the clinic.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In the Analysis Phase, we found that only 46% of the visits had a documented standardized screening with its scoring along with its interpretation. The rate of developmental delay detection during the period was 7.7% whereas the national prevalence of developmental delay was 15% (Vitrikas <I>et al.</I>, 2017). Finally, the pre-intervention average time was 67.85 minutes with an open chart on the day of the visit when a standardized screening was performed and documented. After 2 months of workflow implementation a retrospective chart review was conducted. We observed a decrease in EHR time spent per visit by 14.6% in the visits where the screening was performed and documented. It was noted that the rate of suspected developmental delay detection increased by 19%. Before the implementation of the workflow, 7.7% of well-child visits had a possible delay identified, but after 2 months of workflow implementation this increased to 26.7%.</p><p>We did not obtain a Pre- and Post-intervention Anonymous Survey from providers that could have aided qualitative data. However, the optimized pace and flow of work that followed the workflow implementation was noticeable. Additionally, we were able to bond as a team through weekly PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) cycles.</p><p>The &gt; 10% increase above the national average in the suspected developmental delay detection rate post-intervention may represent the higher prevalence of developmental delay in our demographic area versus the increased number of false positives commonly seen in screening methods (Chiolero <I>et al.,</I> 2015).</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Aylward GP. Developmental screening and assessment: what are we thinking? <I>Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics: JDBP</I> 2009;<b>30</b>(2):169&ndash;173. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0b013e31819f1c3e</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Chiolero A, Paccaud F, Aujesky D, Santschi V, Rodondi N. How to prevent overdiagnosis. <I>Swiss Medical Weekly</I> 2015;<b>145</b>:w14060. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2015.14060</p></li><li><p>Guo U, Chen L, Mehta PH. Electronic health record innovations: helping physicians - one less click at a time. <I>Health Information Management: Journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia</I> 2017;<b>46</b>(3):140&ndash;144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1833358316689481</p></li><li><p>Lee G, McCreary L, Kim MJ, Park CG, Yang S. Individual and environmental factors influencing questionable development among low-income children: differential impact during infancy versus early childhood. <I>Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing</I> 2012;<b>42</b>(7):1039&ndash;1049.</p></li><li><p>Mackrides PS, Ryherd SJ. Screening for developmental delay. <I>American Family Physician</I> 2011;<b>84</b>(5):544&ndash;549.</p></li><li><p>Rydz D, Srour M, Oskoui M, Marget N, Shiller M, Birnbaum R, Majnemer A, Shevell MI. Screening for developmental delay in the setting of a community pediatric clinic: a prospective assessment of parent-report questionnaires. <I>Pediatrics</I> 2006;<b>118</b>(4):e1178&ndash;e1186. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-0466</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Vitrikas K, Savard D, Bucaj M. Developmental delay: when and how to screen. <I>American Family Physician</I> 2017;<b>96</b>(1):36&ndash;43.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Antunes, L. A., Jacob, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.130</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.130</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[130 Developmental screening workflow implementation at a primary care clinic]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A97</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A98</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A99-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[132 Safe transitions: the importance of discharge checklists for paediatric asthma patients]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A99-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The UK National Review of Asthma Deaths (NRAD) revealed that preventable factors contributed to the majority of asthma-related fatalities, with two-thirds of cases demonstrating such factors.<sup>1</sup> The British Thoracic Society (BTS) has progressively expanded its quality improvement initiatives in recent years. In September 2014, BTS convened a dedicated working group to develop an asthma-specific care bundle. This initiative incorporated recommendations from the National Review of Asthma Deaths (NRAD), existing guidelines and quality standards for asthma, as well as insights from the BTS pilot care bundle project. Despite the availability of a discharge checklist for paediatric asthma patients,<sup>2</sup> its use remains inconsistent in clinical practice. This results in missed essential actions that compromise the quality of asthma care, potentially leading to poor health outcomes and increased mortality risk.</p><p>This quality improvement project aims to ensure that all children over the age of five admitted to the paediatric ward with asthma receive the recommended discharge interventions<sup>3</sup> as outlined in the checklist, with full implementation targeted by March 2024.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>I conducted a comprehensive diagnostic phase, utilizing process mapping and a fishbone diagram to gain a deeper understanding of the problem. The Model for Improvement guided the design of my quality improvement project, incorporating insights from the initial diagnostics, a SMART aim, and baseline measurements. To ensure clarity, I established a robust definition with clear inclusion and exclusion criteria and developed a structured sampling strategy, collecting baseline data and implementing weekly sampling throughout the project.</p><p>My change interventions included targeted teaching sessions for paediatric doctors, modifying the format of the discharge form, displaying reminder posters, introducing electronic notifications, incorporating asthma checklist education into induction training, and embedding form completion into ward rounds. To engage staff, I developed a 3 MinuteQI&copy; pitch and delivered regular presentations throughout the project. To measure impact, I utilized a run chart with a median baseline to assess normal variation and identify statistically significant changes. Over three months, I completed five Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, refining interventions based on iterative feedback and data analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The change ideas I implemented did not lead to an overall improvement in outcomes. Notably, in January, performance declined, as evidenced by consecutive data points falling below the median line. This deterioration was attributed to factors such as the junior doctor strike and reduced staffing levels.</p><p>This experience has reinforced the importance of accurately defining the underlying problem before initiating interventions, rather than hastily implementing changes. Adopting a structured, stepwise approach is crucial for achieving meaningful and sustainable improvements. Although my project has not yet yielded a significant enhancement in current practice, the process itself has been a valuable learning experience. I intend to continue making incremental modifications, supported by ongoing data collection and evaluation, to drive progressive improvements over time.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>British Thoracic Society/Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. British Guideline on the Management of Asthma (Updated online 2013). Edinburgh, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, 2013. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/101/index.html</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Royal College of Physicians. Why Asthma Still Kills: The National Review of Asthma Deaths (NRAD) Confidential Enquiry Report. London, RCP, 2014. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">www.rcplondon.ac.uk/sites/default/files/why-asthma-still-kills-full-report.pdf</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). The Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. GINA, 2014. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">www.ginasthma.org</inter-ref>  </p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nebati, E., Rothenberg, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.132</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.132</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[132 Safe transitions: the importance of discharge checklists for paediatric asthma patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A99</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A99</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A99-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[133 Introducing quality indicators for assessment of hospital pharmacy services to provide better quality of care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A99-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>By its definition, pharmaceutical care is directly provided to the patient in order to produce definite outcomes intended to improve the patient&rsquo;s quality of life, and the hospital pharmacist accepts personal responsibility for the outcomes.<sup>1</sup> Many studies demonstrated that there is a correlation between appropriate pharmaceutical care and health outcomes.<sup>2</sup> However, this approach demands more attention allotted to patients by hospital pharmacists.</p><p>The role of hospital pharmacist goes beyond dispensing medicines and medical devices and includes providing safe, appropriate and cost-effective use of medicines and medical devices, health promotion and prevention and developing policies for medicines and medical devices. Coping with the burden of broadening responsibilities and challenges, our hospital pharmacists don&rsquo;t always succeed in the provision of pharmaceutical care. The current situation indicates that the lack of time and interest are major barriers for providing specialized pharmaceutical care, which could put patients at increased risk of medication errors. To provide better pharmaceutical care to hospitalized patients with complex conditions and medication regimens means to overcome many obstacles, such as: pharmacists&rsquo; attitude, fear of additional responsibilities, lack of time, lack of practice skills and knowledge, as well as system-related constraints.</p><p>The aim of this study was to analyze and improve the performance of hospital pharmacists in the care of hospitalized patients at wards and intensive care units (ICUs), and provide better quality of care by introducing mandatory quality indicators for hospital pharmacy services, as standardized, evidence-based measures of pharmaceutical care.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This study was conducted in the University Clinical Center of Serbia, the largest hospital in the Southeastern Europe with more than 3000 beds. In February 2024 hospital pharmacists started reporting quality indicators in our hospital. National set of quality indicators for hospital pharmacy services describes: (i) number of reported adverse reactions to medicines and medical devices, (ii) number of reported quality deviations of medicines and medical devices, (iii) number of internal education programs for healthcare professionals on medicines and medical devices, (iv) number of information and instructions to healthcare professionals (physicians, nurses) on medicines and medical devices provided by hospital pharmacists, and (v) medication review of intrahospital antimicrobial use in intensive care units (ICUs) (number of interventions/total number of patients in ICU * 100).</p><p>The purpose of this change is to urge hospital pharmacists to improve patient care by reporting adverse reactions and quality deviations for medicines and medical devices, increasing the number of relevant information on medicines and medical devices to healthcare professionals, implementing antimicrobial stewardship interventions in order to optimize the use of antimicrobials in ICUs, and organizing internal educational programs for healthcare professionals on medicines and medical devices. Indicators were self-reported by hospital pharmacists and assessed monthly. We encouraged them to ask questions, express doubts, and be straightforward in their reports.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>By analyzing quality indicators, we assessed the pharmaceutical care provided to hospitalized patients. Our preliminary results demonstrated that number of reported adverse reactions and quality deviations of medicines and medical devices were low during the observation period (February-October 2024). Internal education program for healthcare professionals regarding the implementation of the new website and mobile application for antibiotic reconstitution was held every two months, and proved to be very helpful for reconstitution of parenteral antibiotics and storage at point of care. Regarding the provision of clinical pharmacy services, the highest number of information given to healthcare professionals by hospital pharmacists was recorded in the beginning of the reporting, in March (176) and April (135), but later declined due to Easter and summer holidays. When it comes to pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship interventions in ICUs, more than 1000 interventions were reported in each month, except June (437.5). The noticeable differences in scores could be explained by variations in number of hospital pharmacists who reported their interventions. Nevertheless, we expect the increase of hospital pharmacists&rsquo; interventions in the following months.</p><p>Implementation of mandatory quality indicators increased hospital pharmacists&rsquo; self-awareness and prioritized the quality of patient care, but not to the extent we expected before our study. During Easter and summer holidays, feedback from hospital pharmacists was lower due to staff shortages. Moreover, feedback was low considering the number of hospital pharmacists in our hospital (N=41), possibly due to lack of time or interest. Some hospital pharmacists stated that lack of time prevented them from reporting all interventions.</p><p>Mandatory quality indicators reporting led to visible quality improvement in the provision of hospital pharmacy services. Although this study is still in progress, we expect to encourage more hospital pharmacists to perform and report interventions and improve health outcomes for patients.</p><p>We learned that shifting from product-oriented services to patient-centered care demands a lot of time and patience. Introducing quality indicators made hospital pharmacists more aware of their performance, slowly changed their attitude and empowered them to continuously improve their work towards patients. For healthcare system as a whole, better pharmaceutical care can reduce medication errors, optimize the therapy and reduce healthcare costs, thus contributing significantly to healthcare savings.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>American Society of Hospital Pharmacists. ASHP statement on pharmaceutical care. <I>Am J Hosp Pharm</I>. 1993;<b>50</b>(8):1720&ndash;3. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/50.8.1720</p></li><li><p>Naseralallah L, Koraysh S, Alasmar M, Aboujabal B. Effect of pharmacist care on clinical outcomes and therapy optimization in perioperative settings: a systematic review. <I>Am J Health Syst Pharm</I>. 2024;<b>82</b>(1):44&ndash;73. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxae177</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cetkovic, Z., Rajinac, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.133</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.133</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[133 Introducing quality indicators for assessment of hospital pharmacy services to provide better quality of care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A99</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A100</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A101-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[135 Improving the Sheffield psychiatric decisions unit]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A101-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>This work is taking place at the Psychiatric Decisions Unit (PDU) at Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust (SHSC), a mental health hospital Trust in the north of England.</p><p>Nationally, mental health patients account for around 16% of all 12-hour waits in A&amp;E.<sup>1</sup> Within A&amp;E, patients experience a lengthy triage process and speak to multiple professionals, including those who exclusively require mental health support. For those who do not require physical health interventions, the PDU could be an alternative to this pathway by ensuring clients receive access to the right care at the right time.</p><p>The PDU is a place where anyone in Sheffield experiencing a mental health crisis can be referred to and receive an urgent assessment. Clients experience a short-stay (&lt;48 hours) in a nurse-led unit which operates 24/7. Patients must accept a referral to the PDU and are able to leave whenever they choose; they are not detained. This project explores barriers to accessing this service from both staff and service user perspectives.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>To identify the problem of accessing and utilising the PDU, service user and staff feedback questionnaires were developed and distributed to charity and VCSE partners and services that refer to the PDU.</p><p>By analysing the themes of the responses, improvement projects were developed. These included working with South Yorkshire Police to develop a pathway into the PDU, updating the website to provide clearer information, and upskilling PDU staff to reduce the amount of reliance on external services, e.g., venepuncture, to provide more timely access to care.</p><p>The improvement projects are currently in progress with individual measurement plans for each.</p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Royal College of Emergency Medicine. (2022). <I>Patients in mental health crisis twice as likely to spend 12-hours or more in Emergency Departments than other patients</I>, RCEM. Available at: https://rcem.ac.uk/patients-in-mental-health-crisis-twice-as-likely-to-spend-12-hours-or-more-in-emergency-departments-than-other-patients/(Accessed: 21 March 2025).</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glossop, C., Morton, J., Smith, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.135</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.135</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[135 Improving the Sheffield psychiatric decisions unit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A101</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A101</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A101-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[136 Reducing post-partum haemorrhage (>=1000 mL) in women and birthing people from black and ethnic minority groups]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A101-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>A team of key stakeholders from Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (LTHTr), is one of ten who collectively form an innovative peer- to-peer Learning and Action Network (LAN) established by the National Health Service (NHS) Race and Health Observatory (RHO) and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) supported by the Health Foundation. The LAN teams represent eight Integrated Care Systems and spans four regions. Together we are addressing inequalities in severe maternal morbidity, perinatal mortality and neonatal morbidity for people from Black, Asian and other ethnic minority backgrounds through the application of anti- racism focused quality improvement and shared learning.</p><p>Post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) is a serious but rare condition. It usually happens within one day of giving birth, but it can happen up to twelve weeks after having a baby. Our baseline data demonstrated health inequality between population groups with 12% of people from black and ethnic minority groups experiencing PPH &ge;1000 mL per week compared to 5% of white people.</p><p>We aimed to reduce PPH (&ge;1000 mL) experienced by black &amp; ethnic minority women &amp; birthing people by 50% (from 12% to 6%) by March 25.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>We have and continue to apply the NHS RHO Anti-Racism principles to this focused continuous improvement framework. A three-part baseline data collection was completed including three qualitative staff focus groups, nine qualitative service user interviews and quantitative data collection and review including data disaggregation by ethnicity coding. Ongoing qualitative and quantitative data analysis locally and within the LAN with peers and service user representatives.</p><p>We co-designed change ideas and utilised Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) cycles to test them. Tests of change to date include:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Early bird booking with public health education and screening</p></li><li><p>Development of antenatal &amp; intrapartum PPH risk assessment</p></li><li><p>Utilisation of clear drapes for assisted births</p></li><li><p>Antenatal education resources translated into required languages- including the exploration of digital innovations including artificial intelligence</p></li></l></p><p>Thematic analysis of the qualitative data was completed. We utilise measurement for improvement and have plotted time-series quantitative data utilising Statistical Process Control charts to monitor change over time. This enables local understanding of the impact. The LAN then allows for sharing of good practice and deeper exploration of opportunities for improvement nationally.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>This focused continuous improvement work is ongoing however current data demonstrates a sustained reduction in PPH incidence within our population group of focus from 12% to 9% influenced by our PDSA cycles. The team continue to work towards the aim with further improvement to be facilitated and sustained. The team have applied an anti-racism lens to change, demonstrating the value of this in improving care through greater understanding of the population we serve. Reduction in PPH incidence, through the application of the given tests of change demonstrates a targeted approach to reducing harm and improving service user experience and outcomes through creative resource utilisation without the requirement for additional investment.</p><p>Applying an anti-racism lens to focused improvement enables greater insight into the opportunities for change within the care provided for all through identification of population groups to focus improvement efforts with. Utilisation of quality improvement frameworks is essential to effective and efficient utilisation of resources. The dedicated, motivated team is enabling this work to progress at pace. The development of our data dashboard for this focused improvement work demonstrates the power of data disaggregation by ethnicity. Our approach is enabling us to identify improvement opportunities that would otherwise remain hidden. The LAN is enabling learning to be shared nationally as well as locally, creating an environment for positive challenge.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carroll, J., Goss, J., Barber, J., Byrne, G., Craddock, J., John, N., Lambert, J., Morrison, S., Nield, C., Rasool, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.136</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.136</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[136 Reducing post-partum haemorrhage (>=1000 mL) in women and birthing people from black and ethnic minority groups]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A101</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A102</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A102-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[137 'Making a difference for life with a single note music therapy in healthcare: enhancing patient outcomes in ICU and neurology settings]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A102-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>This pilot explores the benefits of music therapy within the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and Neurology Department at Nij Smellinghe Hospital in the Netherlands, conducted in collaboration with ZuidOostZorg (Nursing and Care Homes). The pilot aimed to assess whether music therapy enhances the well-being of patients and supports the multidisciplinary healthcare team in providing holistic care. Music therapy is a therapeutic intervention based on scientific research, using music to address both clinical and socio-emotional goals, and is often combined with other treatments such as speech or physiotherapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Question</st><p>How does music therapy contribute to the therapeutic process in ICU and Neurology patients, specifically in terms of enhancing cognitive functions, speech/language, motor functions, reducing stress, and improving emotional well-being?</p><p>Given that music therapy is still an emerging intervention within clinical settings, the pilot sought to understand its benefits on patient outcomes, such as stress reduction, speech recovery, and motor function improvement, in collaboration with traditional therapies.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The study followed a three-phase design: preparation, implementation, and evaluation. The preparation phase involved stakeholder engagement, goal setting, and training the music therapist in specialized techniques (e.g., NMT/MATADOC). During the implementation phase, music therapy sessions were conducted for six months, with pre- and post-assessments to evaluate progress. Results were discussed in multidisciplinary meetings, allowing for coordinated care. Patients and their families provided qualitative feedback on their experiences. The evaluation phase focused on analyzing the collected data, including patient progress and team feedback, to determine the effectiveness of the intervention.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Initial findings show that music therapy has positive benefits on both the emotional and clinical outcomes for patients. Music was particularly effective in reducing stress and anxiety in ICU patients, with observed improvements in mood and physical responses, such as enhanced motor skills and cognitive function. Notably, music was also used to stimulate speech in patients with aphasia, aiding their communication abilities through Speech Music Therapy for Aphasia (SMTA) and interactive songs. Multidisciplinary collaboration enhanced the therapy&rsquo;s value, as team members adjusted their therapeutic approaches based on the music therapist&rsquo;s observations.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The pilot study demonstrated that music therapy can significantly complement traditional treatments, particularly in ICU and neurology settings. It provides a unique, non-verbal avenue for patients to engage emotionally and physically, fostering improvements in motor skills, speech/language, cognition, and emotional well-being. Future research is needed to further evaluate its long-term benefits and broaden its application across healthcare settings.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Veen, E. v. d.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.137</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.137</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[137 'Making a difference for life with a single note music therapy in healthcare: enhancing patient outcomes in ICU and neurology settings]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A102</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A102</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A4?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5 Clinical decision support for clinical quality improvement]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A4?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Context</st><p>BMJ Best Practice is the clinical decision support tool of the BMJ.<sup>1</sup> It is an evidence-based knowledge resource which is intended to improve the quality of clinical care.</p></sec><sec><st>Problem</st><p>Healthcare professionals need to continually improve the quality of care that they provide. They also need to ensure that their quality improvement interventions are evidence-based.<sup>2</sup> However, quality improvement projects are time-consuming to undertake and are not always evidence-based.</p></sec><sec><st>Assessment of Problem and Analysis of Its Causes</st><p>Quality improvement projects require a great deal of work if they are to be done properly. Healthcare professionals need to describe the problem that they are trying to fix; to outline the available knowledge on the problem; to explain the rationale for their project; to develop an intervention tool or tools; and to develop a means of measuring the effectiveness of their intervention.</p></sec><sec><st>Intervention</st><p>BMJ Best Practice can be used to expedite the work required in a quality improvement project.<sup>3</sup> BMJ Best Practice can outline the available knowledge on a particular clinical problem; it can outline the prevalence and complications of the problem and hence the rationale to improve quality; it can be part of a quality improvement intervention; and it can be used to evidence a measurement tool that will assess the effectiveness of an intervention.</p></sec><sec><st>Strategy for change</st><p>We encouraged individual healthcare professionals who had access to BMJ Best Practice to use the resource in quality improvement projects. We communicated this message to them via email, social media, and face-to-face and virtual meetings.</p></sec><sec><st>Measurement of Improvement</st><p>We set up alerts on medical publication databases so that we were notified when BMJ Best Practice was used in a project or study to improve the quality of clinical care. Thus far we have identified 38 projects.</p><p>This work shows that BMJ Best Practice and clinical decision support are being used in a variety of different types of quality improvement projects. The projects showed BMJ Best Practice being used to improve quality in primary, secondary, and tertiary care by doctors, nurses, pharmacists, physiotherapists, radiologists, laboratory staff, and other healthcare professionals. Both junior and senior staff carried out the projects. The projects spanned a range of specialities including general practice, infectious disease, orthopaedics, cardiology, rheumatology, addiction medicine, general surgery, toxicology, nutrition, emergency medicine, radiology, neurology, ophthalmology, hepatology, and public health.</p><p>Please Describe How You Have Involved Patients, Carers, or Family Members in the Project</p><p>We have involved patients and patient advocates in the development of BMJ Best Practice. We have ensured that we use language that is empowering of patients and that the content leads to outcomes that are important to patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Effects of Changes</st><p>The projects showed that BMJ Best Practice is effective at improving care across several clinical domains including diagnosis, investigations, reporting, discharge planning, and management. Outcomes achieved included shorter length of stay, fewer unnecessary tests and treatments, better compliance with guidelines, improved patient empowerment, improved turnaround times for tests, avoiding medical error, improved diagnosis and management, improved reporting of notifiable diseases, and improved management of patients with comorbidities.</p></sec><sec><st>Lessons Learned</st><p>We learned the importance of encouraging healthcare professionals to think about the efficiency as well as the effectiveness of their quality improvement projects. Healthcare professionals do not need to start from scratch every time they do a quality improvement project. Using existing resources (such as BMJ Best Practice) as part of their projects makes quality improvement more likely to be scalable and sustainable into the long term.</p></sec><sec><st>Messages for Others</st><p>We have evaluated the impact of BMJ Best Practice as a quality improvement intervention in England, Scotland, China, and Georgia. We would be delighted if healthcare systems in different countries were interested in evaluating its impact within their own contexts of care.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>BMJ Best Practice. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://bestpractice.bmj.com/info/</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Walsh K. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">The future of e-learning in healthcare professional education: some possible directions</inter-ref>. <I>Annali dell&rsquo;Istituto superiore di sanita</I> 2014;<b>50</b>:309&ndash;310.</p></li><li><p>Collis J, Farquharson B, Chan S, Dickson-Lowe R. The Implementation of a rib fracture pathway at a small district general hospital to improve patient care. <I>Cureus</I> 2023 May 11;<b>15</b>(5):e38863.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conflicts of interest</st><p>KW works for BMJ. There was no external source of funding for this work.</p></sec><sec><st>Ethics Approval</st><p>Ethics approval was not required as this was not research.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walsh, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.5</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.5</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5 Clinical decision support for clinical quality improvement]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A4</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A5</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A7?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[10 Beyond technology: a sociotechnical perspective on barcode systems for patient identification]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A7?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Patient misidentification occurs when a patient is identified as someone else. This can happen at various points in the healthcare process. Misidentifying a patient can lead to the patient receiving the wrong care potentially resulting in serious harm or death. Barcode technology has been promoted as a potential solution to reduce the risk of misidentification (HSSIB, 2024). However, the focus on technology alone misses the broader sociotechnical context within which barcode systems are used.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To enable any potential benefits, a barcode system should be considered as a sociotechnical innovation. That is, one that is dependent on the &lsquo;meticulous interrelation of the skilled and pragmatically oriented work of health care professionals&rsquo; (Berg, 1999, p88). The aim of this work was to identify key interrelated challenges to adopting technology-supported change in patient identification.</p></sec><sec><st>Method used</st><p>Various frameworks exist to support the identification of interactions and complexity within technology projects. This work used the non-adoption, abandonment scale-up, spread and sustainability framework combined with a practical complexity assessment toolkit (NASSS-CAT, Greenhalgh, et al., 2020) to help identify key challenges and their interrelated nature.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Three challenges were identified using the NASSS-CAT, these included &lsquo;technical&rsquo; interoperability (integration with existing systems) and &lsquo;social&rsquo; interoperability (integration with workflow design and staff perceptions).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The success of any technology transformation programme hinges on understanding and addressing the intricate web of interactions between people, processes, and technology. Technology alone will not enable improvements in patient safety. By using sociotechnical frameworks such as the NASSS-CAT, healthcare organisations can unpick complex challenges prior to introducing technology and support greater adoption, scale and spread of sociotechnical change.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Berg M. (1999). Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach. <I>International Journal of Medical Informatics</I> 87&ndash;101.</p></li><li><p>Greenhalgh T, Maylor H, Shaw S, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, Betton V, Taylor J. The NASSS-CAT tools for understanding, guiding, monitoring, and researching technology implementation projects in health and social care: protocol for an evaluation study in real-world settings. <I>JMIR Research Protocol</I> 2020;e16861.</p></li><li><p>HSSIB. (2024). National learning report: Positive patient identification. Retrieved June 24.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Herlihey, T. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.10</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.10</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[10 Beyond technology: a sociotechnical perspective on barcode systems for patient identification]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A7</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A8</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A11?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[15 Improving the monitoring of allopurinol urate lowering therapy for gout prophylaxis in primary care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A11?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Gout is a common condition characterised by hyperuricaemia and monosodium urate crystal deposition in joints resulting in painful acute inflammatory arthropathies, often in the first metatarsophalangeal joint.<sup>1</sup>Urate lowering therapy (ULT) is a form of lifelong prophylaxis using Allopurinol,<sup>2,3</sup> which reduces the incidence of acute flares and the risk of permanent joint damage.<sup>4,5</sup> The recommended serum urate treatment target is &lt;0.36 mmol/L,<sup>5</sup> which is lower than the upper limit of normal reported on biochemistry results.<sup>6</sup> While it is recommended that patients receive regular review and have their ULT titrated to an appropriate serum urate target, this rarely occurs in primary care settings.<sup>5,7</sup>  </p><p>This quality improvement project took place between October 2023 and April 2024 in a 5000-patient, semi-rural general medical practice located in south-west Scotland. It involved 93 patients, 85% of whom were male, with a median age of 78. It was led by CS, a penultimate-year medical student, under the supervision of JC, a GP partner, and supported by clinical, pharmacy, and administrative staff.</p><p>Baseline data collection in October 2023 showed that only 9 patients (11% of the cohort) had had their serum urate level checked and allopurinol level appropriately titrated within the previous year.</p><p>The aim of the project was to improve the regular monitoring of ULT by increasing the percentage of patients prescribed allopurinol for gout prophylaxis in the practice, who had their dosage appropriately titrated according to a recent urate level blood test, in accordance with NG219,<sup>5</sup> in the previous 12 months, by 50% by April 2024.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods and changes</st><p>Using input from key stakeholders among the practice staff and patient population, alongside quality improvement tools, the barriers to regular Allopurinol monitoring were identified. These were used to generate four change ideas predicted to have the greatest impact:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Practice Education</p></li><li><p>Creating a poster to display in consultation rooms</p></li><li><p>Inviting patients for a urate check and review</p></li><li><p>Creating an annual gout monitoring review process</p></li></l></p><p>For each change a Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycle was used to evaluate the test and guide future work. The initial change ideas (practice education through meetings and posters) were implemented in late 2023 and were successful in addressing knowledge gaps and engaging staff, but did not impact the opportunities for regular review. To address this, the third change involved inviting the cohort of patients for review. This change idea was the largest undertaking of the project and ultimately took longer than anticipated to implement due to unforeseen staff absences between January and March 2024. The final change, implemented in April 2024, was introduce an annual gout review for all patients prescribed Allopurinol for ULT.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Overall, this project met the outcome aim, increasing the percentage of patients prescribed allopurinol who had their dosage appropriately titrated according to a urate level blood test within the last year by 53% from 11% to 64%.</p><p>In addition, the percentage of patients with a urate level measured in the prior year and the proportion with their most recent serum urate level below the treatment target both increased, indicating an overall improvement in the control of hyperuricaemia among the cohort. Despite this, the number of acute flares experienced by patients receiving ULT did not change significantly during the project. This may be due to small number statistics or be explained by the fact that acute flares often result in initiation of ULT.</p><p>These changes involved 49 phlebotomy appointments over the project, reflecting an increased workload for practice staff and time burden for the patients involved. Despite the initial cost, the introduction of an annual recall system should result in only 2&ndash;3 new appointments on average per month, as two-thirds of the patients had existing annual review appointments. Furthermore, patients and staff felt a positive impact from the project, reporting improved confidence and knowledge regarding the process of ULT.</p><p>Maintaining practice education to ensure new diagnoses are added to the annual review system will be challenging, but by introducing annual gout monitoring recall and incorporating this into existing annual reviews for the 68% of patients who already had one this change can be sustained in the coming years without significantly adding to the workload for staff.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Dalbeth N, Merriman TR, Stamp LK. <I>Gout Lancet.</I> 2016;<b>388</b>(10055):2039&ndash;2052.</p></li><li><p>Emmerson BT. The management of gout. <I>N Engl J Med</I>. 1996 Feb 15;<b>334</b>(7):445&ndash;51. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199602153340707. PMID: 8552148.</p></li><li><p>Allopurinol (BNF) (no date) NICE. Available at: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://bnf.nice.org.uk/drugs/allopurinol</inter-ref> (Accessed: 01 October 2023)</p></li><li><p>Pascual E, Sivera F. Time required for disappearance of urate crystals from synovial fluid after successful hypouricaemic treatment relates to the duration of gout. <I>Ann Rheum Dis</I>. 2007;<b>66</b>(8):1056&ndash;1058.</p></li><li><p>National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2022). Gout: diagnosis and management [NICE guideline NG219]. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng219</inter-ref>  </p></li><li><p>Reference Ranges (2017) NHS choices. Available at: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">http://pathology.royalberkshire.nhs.uk/ranges.asp?refranges=ur</inter-ref> (Accessed: 01 October 2023).</p></li><li><p>Gurwitz JH, Kalish SC, Bohn RL, Glynn RJ, Monane M, Mogun H, Avorn J. Thiazide diuretics and the initiation of anti-gout therapy. <I>J Clin Epidemiol</I>. 1997 Aug;<b>50</b>(8):953&ndash;9. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00101-7. PMID: 9291881.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conflicts of Interest</st><p>none</p></sec><sec><st>Ethical Approval</st><p>Caldicott approval granted</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sinclair, C., Callander, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.15</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.15</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[15 Improving the monitoring of allopurinol urate lowering therapy for gout prophylaxis in primary care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A11</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A12</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A14?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[21 The accuracy of the HEART score compared to a Novel scoring system in predicting MACE]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A14?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Chest discomfort is undeniably the scariest presentation a doctor can face in any field of medicine. As such, it becomes imperative to quickly diagnose and manage any case out of concern for a possible sudden cardiac death. However, resources are finite, so allocating these resources to efficiently and appropriately manage all possible presentations is essential.</p><p>Many clinical protocols or tools exist to help rationalise diagnostic decisions made by clinicians by utilizing the patient&rsquo;s description of symptoms, ECG, assessment, and investigations (such as Troponin levels, CKMB, Cardiac Calcium CT score, etc.).</p><p>Some examples of these decision-making tools are EDACS, ESC, GRACE, HEART, SVEAT, ADAPT, and TIMI. The most renowned is the HEART score system, a risk stratification tool that may safely reduce chest pain admissions for emergency department (ED) patients. This is supported by many publications that have noted almost 100% sensitivity in diagnosing Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE).<sup>1</sup> The HEART Pathway determines the appropriate ED pathway for patient management depending on the patient's score.</p><p>However, as many studies have shown, the accuracy varies depending on the population being assessed. As the prevalence of ACS varies across different populations and settings. For instance, in elderly patients hospitalized, the prevalence of MACE, which includes ACS, was found to be only 14.7%.<sup>2</sup>  </p><p>Another study, which noted that the prevalence of MACE recurrence was 17.8% at three months and 25.2% at one year,<sup>3</sup> further supported this. Among post-ACS patients, 28% experienced recurrent MACE.<sup>4</sup>  </p><p>As such, establishing that MACE presentations can greatly vary based on the demographic. Thus, creating a universally applicable MACE assessment protocol becomes difficult as most protocols are rigid and cannot account for unique clinical presentations.</p><p>One study found that the HEART score has an area under the curve (AUC) of approximately 0.796 to 0.856 in predicting 30-day MACE, indicating moderate predictive ability.<sup>5</sup>  </p><p>A supporting study which compared the SVEAT score, and HEART score noted sensitivity of 94.7% (95% CI 88.9%&ndash;98.0%) and 93.0% (95% CI 86.7%&ndash;96.9%), respectively, while specificity of both scores was 84.1% (95% CI 81.0%&ndash;86.6%) and 53.17% (95% CI 49.3%&ndash;56.6%).<sup>6</sup> Thus, proving the limitation of the HEART score compared to its counterparts. This disparity in results seems to be further influenced by the conductor bias as a study conducted in compared to research generated HEART scores, ED clinicians&rsquo; HEART scores had a 100% sensitivity (95CI 88.4%&ndash;100%, versus 86.7%, 95CI 69.3%&ndash;96.2%), and a 27.8% specificity (95CI 22.8%&ndash;33.2%, versus 34.6%, 95CI 29.3%&ndash;40.3%) in predicting 30-day MACE.<sup>7</sup>  </p><p>Nonetheless, most clinicians tend to instinctively side with caution and approach all cases with a low threshold to admission to ensure that no case is missed through the cracks in the system that most physicians are hyperaware of.</p><p>Unfortunately, this stretches hospital resources such as manpower, investigatory services such as echocardiograms and stress tests, and acute hospital beds to practice defensive medicine and rule out the differential rather than treating the patient. As such, this research will aim to design a new chest pain assessment protocol inspired by preceding clinical tools that is more flexible in its application to account for differing demographics.</p></sec><sec><st>Methodology</st><p>The study was a retrospective case-control study conducted using a simple random sampling technique on emergency department patients at Midland Regional Hospital Tullamore.</p><p>Patients&rsquo; charts were followed up for 30 days after admission to assess the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events, including myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiac arrest, and cardiovascular death.</p><p>The researcher would then input the data to the HEART score and a novel &lsquo;X-score system&rsquo; scoring system (tables 2, 3 and 4 respectively) and compare predictions from both systems on the same cases. The data would be collected in data collection sheets.</p><p>The data included the patient&rsquo;s subjective symptoms, risk factors, ECG interpretation, and troponin levels. Furthermore, to maintain full anonymity, no identifiable details such as the patient's name, identification, address, or date of birth were recorded.</p><p>After that, the data were analyzed for the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the curve for the HEART score compared to the X score.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The study&rsquo;s outcome was that out of 101 cases, 31.6% were accurate MACE, and 69.4% were non-MACE outcomes. The sensitivity and specificity of the X-score system, with a cut-off score of 6, noted a sensitivity of 84.4%, specificity of 73.9%, positive predictive value of 60% and negative predictive value of 91.1% with a 95% confidence interval and a p-value of 0.0001. This is compared to the HEART score, which noted a sensitivity of 90.6% and specificity of 13%, negative predictive value of 75% and positive predictive value of 67% but with a confidence interval of 95% and a p-value of &gt;0.1 (refer to <cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>).</p><p>Furthermore, the Area Under the Curve for the HEART score and X-score in predicting MACE were 0.65 and 0.74, respectively, indicating that the X-score model has better discriminative ability to distinguish between positive and negative cases than the HEART score <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>This research has provided valuable insights into the comparative effectiveness of the HEART score system in assessing MACE suspected cases and its overall poor predictive accuracy in stratifying risk among patients of different populations compared to novel systems for patients with acute chest pain. Thus, it proves the merit of designing a risk stratification tool to better suit target demographics rather than utilizing a universal system. Therefore, better rationalizing tools can be implemented to better justify clinician decisions and improve overall patient care.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 21 Figure 1</no><caption><p>ROC of HEART score vs X-score system</p></caption><link locator="21_F1"></fig></p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 21 Table 1</no><caption><p>Outcome of HEART score vs X-score system</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Category</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>HEART Score</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>VS</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>X-score</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="4" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Specificity </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">13% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="4"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">70% </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Sensitivity </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">90.6% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">80.1% </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Negative Predictive Value </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>  <I>75</I>  </b>  <b>  <I>%</I>  </b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>  <I>91.1</I>  </b>  <b>  <I>%</I>  </b> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Positive Predictive Value </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>  <I>67</I>  </b>  <b>  <I>%</I>  </b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>  <I>60</I>  </b>  <b>  <I>%</I>  </b> </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p><tbl id="T2" loc="float"><no>Abstract 21 Table 2</no><caption><p>The X-score assessment protocol</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>  <unl>Risk Factor (Max of 15)</unl>  </b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Points</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&bull; Age &gt;55 years </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1p </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&bull; Age&lt;55 years </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">-1p </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&bull; Chronic Kidney Disease Hx </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2p </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&bull; Diabetes Mellitus History </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2p </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&bull; Hyperlipidemia (high LDL) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1p </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&bull; 1<sup>st</sup> degree relative &lt;55 yr/old </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1p </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&bull; Reduced EF&lt;40% or clinical/signs of cardiac failure/Frank pulmonary edema </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2p </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&bull; ICD/PPM implant, known cardiac channelopathy </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1p </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&bull; Smoker/ex-smoker </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1p </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&bull; Any prior revascularization for coronary/carotid/peripheral disease or history of MACE </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2p </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&bull; Typical unstable angina pectoris/like previous +ve MACE </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2p </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&bull; Stable angina (Central/squeezing/retrosternal/stabbing) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1P </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&bull; Non-cardiac chest pain </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0P </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p><tbl id="T3" loc="float"><no>Abstract 21 Table 3</no><caption><p>Red flags (ECGs)</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>  <unl>RED FLAGS (ECGs</unl>  <unl>)</unl>  </b> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">New ECG CHANGES: 3P </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&bull; 1. Transient ST segment </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&bull; 2. New LBBB </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&bull; 3.Horizontal/down-sloping-ST depression </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&bull; 4. New T wave inversion </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&bull; 5. Hyperacute T wave amplitude </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&bull; 6. U-wave inversion. </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Normal ECG/Old changes 0P </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p><tbl id="T4" loc="float"><no>Abstract 21 Table 4</no><caption><p>Red flags (investigatory)</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>  <unl>RED FLAGS (</unl>Lab Investigations)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Points</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&bull; 3&ndash;12hr: Serial Troponin  of 20&ndash;25% from Upper limit/baseline </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3P </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&bull; 3&ndash;12hr: Serial Troponin  10&ndash;20% from Upper limit/baseline </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1P </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&bull; 3&ndash;12hr: Troponin&lt;14ng/l or serial data  &lt;10% upper limit/baseline </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3P </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&bull; &gt;12hr: Trop rise &lt;10% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0P </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p><tbl id="T5" loc="float"><no>Abstract 21 Table 5</no><caption><p>X-score protocol pathway</p></caption><tblbdy><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&lt;6 point + 0 red flag </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Discharge </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3 points + Red Flag = 6p </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Admit for work up +/- Angiogram </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0 point + 1 -4 red flag </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Cardiology consult </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">12points + NO Red flag </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Medical consult </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Dai SM, Huang B, Zou Y, Guo J, Liu Z, Pi D, Qiu Y, Xiao C. The HEART score is useful for predicting cardiovascular risks and reduces unnecessary cardiac imaging in low-risk patients with acute chest pain. <I>Medicine (Baltimore)</I> 2018 Jun;<b>97</b>(22):e10844. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000010844</p></li><li><p>Asfeen U, Chakilam R, Parvez M, Avaiya NS, Chauhan S, Kotla NK, Kondaveety S, Igbenabor CA, Thappar KS, Desai R. Prevalence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) vs no MACCE in elderly hospitalized patients with amyloidosis; its gender and racial disparities: a nationwide analysis (2016-2020). <I>Blood</I> 2024;<b>144</b>(Suppl 1):6902. doi:10.1182/blood-2024-212310</p></li><li><p>Shuey TC, Voyce S, Jones LK, Johns A, deRichemond C, LeMaire SA, Lagerman B, Agarwal S. Analysis of residual risk and recurrent event trends following acute coronary syndrome: a cohort study. 2024. doi:10.1101/2024.09.08.24313086</p></li><li><p>Huang H, Ye F, Huang Y, Ye G, Zhu J, Chi X, Zhang G. Coronary CT angiography and serum biomarkers are potential biomarkers for predicting MACE at three-months and one-year follow-up. <I>Int J Cardiovasc Imaging</I> 2022;<b>38</b>(12):2763&ndash;2770. doi:10.1007/s10554-022-02646-4</p></li><li><p>Gol M, Bayram N, Demir O, Karacabey S, Sanri E. SVEAT score: acute chest pain risk stratification. <I>Am J Emerg Med.</I> 2024;<b>80</b>:24&ndash;28. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2024.02.041</p></li><li><p>Antwi-Amoabeng D, Roongsritong C, Taha M, Beutler BD, Awad M, Hanfy A, Ghuman J, Manasewitsch NT, Singh S, Quang C, Gullapalli N. SVEAT score outperforms HEART score in patients admitted to a chest pain observation unit. <I>World J Cardiol.</I> 2022;<b>14</b>(8):454&ndash;461. doi:10.4330/wjc.v14.i8.454</p></li><li><p>Soares WE, Knee A, Gemme SR, Hambrecht R, Dybas S, Poronsky KE, Mader SC, Mader TJ. A prospective evaluation of clinical heart score agreement, accuracy, and adherence in emergency department chest pain patients. <I>Ann Emerg Med.</I> 2021 Aug. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8324528/.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Muhieldin, M. E., Memon, M. D., Neilan, L., Mohamed, S., Abdalgadir, A., Meo, A., Ahmed, M. A., Spain, J., Houlihan, S., Oconnor, J., Azeez, S., Kumar, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.21</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.21</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[21 The accuracy of the HEART score compared to a Novel scoring system in predicting MACE]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A14</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A16</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A16?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[22 Tan tock seng hospital clinic 5A general medicine department pharmacist-led risk factors management clinic hypertensive first visit patients achieving blood pressure goal]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A16?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Hypertension is a silent disease and yet it is a major cause of death worldwide. Valerie Santschi et al&rsquo;s 2014<sup>1</sup> meta-analysis reported that compared to usual care of just following up with doctors, pharmacist interventions showed greater reduction in blood pressure (BP). The Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists&rsquo; Collaboration<sup>2</sup> (a large-scale analysis of randomized trials) showed that a 5 mmHg reduction of systolic BP reduced the risk of major cardiovascular events by about 10%, irrespective of previous diagnoses of cardiovascular disease and even at normal or high-normal BP values.</p><p>At Tan Tock Seng Hospital (TTSH) Clinic 5A General Medicine Department (GMD) Pharmacist-led Risk Factors Management Clinic (RFMP), the pharmacists optimise patients&rsquo; medications for chronic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia. The key performance indicator of RFMP is improvement in systolic BP by 5 mmHg from baseline in 3 months. From May 2019 to Feb 2022, there were 19 patients and only 63% of them achieved this.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A multidisciplinary team (physicians, pharmacists, clinic manager, nurses and patient service associate (PSA) working in Clinic 5A) was formed. A patient survey was conducted on 9 patients who were seen at RFMP. The cause and extent of the problem and results from the patient survey were shared at the first meeting where the team met and agreed to work on the problem.</p><p>Clinical Practice Improvement Programme (CPIP) methodology (flowchart, brainstorming, affinity diagram, cause &amp; effect diagram, multi-voting and Pareto Chart) was applied and the vital few root causes were identified to intervene upon.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Intervention 1</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>PDSA 1A (16 Sep 2022): Refresher to GMD doctors on RFMP referral criteria and how to refer in electronic medical record (EPIC)</p></li><li><p>PDSA 1B (26 Sep 2022): Remind GMD doctors to state the BP target for each patient in EPIC notes</p></li><li><p>PDSA1C (1 Apr 2023): Increase GMD RFMP from 1 to 2 clinic sessions per week</p></li><li><p>Intervention 2</p></li><li><p>PDSA 2A (7 Jun 2023): Educate GMD RFMP patients about home BP monitoring and provide home BP monitoring chart</p></li><li><p>PDSA 2B (16 Jun 2023): Include Mandarin wordings in the home BP monitoring chart</p></li></l></p><p>Feedback from staff and patients involved were acted upon throughout the PSDA cycles.</p><p>GMD RFMP hypertensive first visit patients achieving BP goal increased from 63% (Pre-Intervention median) to 68% (Post-Intervention median) from May 2019 to April 2023. The results further improved to 73% as of July 2024. Nil adverse event (dizziness, low BP or falls) was reported throughout the intervention phase.</p><p>Doctors, nurses, PSAs, pharmacist and patients were more aware of the role of RFMP and worked towards better BP management of RFMP patients.</p><p>Extrapolating from Sherilyn K.D. et al&rsquo;s 2012<sup>3</sup> study, cost saving for RFMP would be S$133 per patient.</p></sec><sec><st>Impact</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>More patients achieving BP improvement with no adverse events reported.</p></li><li><p>RFMP patients are empowered to take and chart their home BP correctly.</p></li><li><p>RFMP clinic micro flow expanded where new hypertensive patients are educated on home BP monitoring and provided with home BP chart while repeat visit hypertensive patients are assessed if they are competent in taking home BP and that their home BP charts are reviewed.</p></li></l></p><p>To conclude, utilizing a structured approach like the CPIP methodology is effective for dissecting and systematically addressing the problem. Engaging key stakeholders from the outset is crucial for securing the necessary support to initiate and complete the project successfully. Additionally, collaborating with like-minded team members is essential to reach the project&rsquo;s intended objectives.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Santschi V, Chiolero A, Colosimo AL, Platt RW, Taff&eacute; P, Burnier M, Burnand B, Paradis G. Improving blood pressure control through pharmacist interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. <I>J Am Heart Assoc</I>. 2014 Apr 10;<b>3</b>(2):e000718. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000718. PMID: 24721801; PMCID: PMC4187511.</p></li><li><p>Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists&rsquo; Collaboration. Pharmacological blood pressure lowering for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease across different levels of blood pressure: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis. <I>Lancet</I>. 2021 May 1;<b>397</b>(10285):1625&ndash;1636. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00590-0. Erratum in: Lancet. 2021 May 22;<b>397</b>(10288):1884. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01069-2. PMID: 33933205; PMCID: PMC8102467.</p></li><li><p>Houle SK, Chuck AW, McAlister FA, Tsuyuki RT. Effect of a pharmacist-managed hypertension program on health system costs: an evaluation of the Study of Cardiovascular Risk Intervention by Pharmacists-Hypertension (SCRIP-HTN). <I>Pharmacotherapy</I>. 2012 Jun;<b>32</b>(6):527&ndash;37. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.2012.01097.x. Epub 2012 May 2. PMID: 22552863.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kng, K. K., Lee, E. Y., Tze Wong, C. L., D/O Ram Sing, A. D., Lee, H. L., Li, L., Borja, A., Sule, A. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.22</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.22</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[22 Tan tock seng hospital clinic 5A general medicine department pharmacist-led risk factors management clinic hypertensive first visit patients achieving blood pressure goal]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A16</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A16</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A17?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[23 Emergency department prescription payments at London North West university healthcare NHS trust]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A17?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Introduction</st><p>In 2023, the London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust (LNWH) Accident and Emergency (A&amp;E) departments saw 308,036 patients and issued approximately 17,000 medicines at Northwick Park Hospital (NPH) largest site.<sup>1</sup> Since installing a payment kiosk at NPH in 2017, little revenue was generated from prescription charges, despite 40% of England&rsquo;s population being non-exempt.<sup>2</sup> This resulted in a potential loss of &pound;68,000 annually, which could be reinvested to enhance patient care and departmental resources.</p><p>Only a handful of A&amp;E departments take prescription charges in the UK despite it being a legal requirement. Majority of the departments have poor engagement from staff and patients and lack a sustainable process for collecting prescription payments.</p><p>The aim of this project was to improve accessibility to medicines whilst establishing a sustainable process for collecting prescription charges for discharge medication (To take away) TTA packs in Emergency Departments (ED) and Urgent Care Centres (UCCs) at LNWH.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Fishbone and driver diagrams were used to identify barriers for income generation for prescriptions. This involved input from clinicians, nurses, pharmacists and finance specialists. Regular stakeholder meetings occurred to guide strategies, emphasising staff training and patient communication. Awareness was built through emails, posters, and newsletters. Nurse training occurred over eight weeks from September to October 2024 covering exemption checks, kiosk usage, and payment recording. Implementation steps included activating the NPH kiosk, resolving technical issues, introducing electronic prompts on Omnicells (Medication dispensing cabinets), and deploying card readers at all 3 hospital sites. Staff and Patient feedback via surveys took place to assess the payment process post-implementation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results and Conclusion</st><p>Since starting the project from August 2024 to February 2025, &pound;38,000 income was generated <I>(<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>).</I> The highest monthly income was &pound;6,534 in October 2024 after introducing staff training, communications, and electronic prompts. A decline in income occurred in November&ndash;December 2024 due to kiosk technical issues, later resolved through supplier collaboration. Plans are underway to introduce additional payment devices, such as tablets with contactless payment and e-receipts, to improve accessibility for staff and patients.</p><p>Increased revenue enables reinvestment in ED and UCC resources, improving care quality. Patients benefited from a transparent payment system, reducing discharge confusion and improving medication access. Challenges included staff resistance, technical issues, and delays in configuring payment systems. Early staff engagement, role assignments, and digital payment options could have been explored to enhance the process. We are looking to expand this project in ambulatory care and surgical day case areas. This model could be shared across NHS hospitals, supporting income generation and service improvements in secondary care.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 23 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Run chart for prescription income from ED and UCC at LNWH</p></caption><link locator="23_F1"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Qlik.com- Emergency Department Dashboard.</p></li><li><p>House of Lords, &lsquo;Written question: Prescriptions: Fees and charges (HL5756)&rsquo;, 7 March 2023.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shantilal, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.23</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.23</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[23 Emergency department prescription payments at London North West university healthcare NHS trust]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A17</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A17</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A21?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[31 An international multidisciplinary multimodal learning pathway for patient safety in intensive care medicine: 'everyone teaches, everyone learns!]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A21?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Around 1 in every 10 patients is harmed in health care and more than 3 million deaths occur annually due to unsafe care. In low-to-middle income countries, as many as 4 in 100 people die from unsafe care; more than half of patient harm (1 in every 20 patients) is preventable [WHO, 2021]. In intensive care units (ICUs), a severe or potentially detrimental error occurs on average twice a day [Donchin, 1995]. In 2009, as part of a series of actions to raise the awareness of both professionals and the public on the issue of patient safety, European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) initiated a task force with the aim of improving the safety and quality of care provided to critically ill patients. This task force developed a directive for change that was signed by 57 national and international critical care organisations in the Vienna Declaration [Moreno, 2009]. Moreover, there was a follow-up of a series of ESICM-supported studies investigating the level of patient safety events in ICUs worldwide, which documented the scale of the problem [Valentin, 2009]. The current learning pathway builds on the outputs of previous projects undertaken by ESICM to support learning and research in patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>What you did</st><p>In 2023, the Taskforce launched the first edition of the Patient Safety Training and Research Program of the ESICM. This educational initiative targets intensivists, intensive care nurses, allied healthcare professionals and clinical pharmacists who wish to improve their knowledge and skills in the field of patient safety and who are members of the ESICM. The program includes a hybrid training programme to allow participants to acquire, apply and integrate knowledge and skills through:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>4 live virtual interactive sessions (LIS) about the history of safety research and implementation science; patient safety in the operating room; patient safety in the ICU; organizational concepts of patient safety centered interventions</p></li><li><p>15 fellowships for candidates from 12 different countries who visits &lsquo;best practice&rsquo; ICUs in Germany, France, and Italy)</p></li><li><p>a research competition awarding 2 research initiatives with 10.000 euro awards)</p></li><li><p>face to face case-based expert-led workshops: 35 participants (during the annual ESICM congress)</p></li></l></p><p>This program is supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Philips; the program has not been influenced in any way by the sponsor.</p><p>Carers are involved in the program which included a session on the Voice of the patient &amp; family.</p></sec><sec><st>What it means</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>LIS were found useful to extremely useful by 96% of a total of 475 registrations from 22 different (non-)European countries.</p></li><li><p>Fellowships were found useful to extremely useful by 87% of the 15 participants and impactful for their clinical practice by 87% of the participants.</p></li><li><p>Case Based Essentials were found useful in helping the participants to understand the basic concepts of patient safety and quality improvement.</p></li></l></p><p>The overall conclusions show us that such an ICU patient safety program is useful and impactful in participants&rsquo; professional activity and therefore much needed to further improve clinical performance and patient care.</p></sec><sec><st>Lessons Learnt</st><p>An ICU multidisciplinary multimodal patient safety training &amp; research program can be very effective and inspiring: virtual live sessions, on site fellowships at &lsquo;best practice&rsquo; ICUs, awarding innovative research and live case-based interactive workshops facilitate &lsquo;learning, teaching and research&rsquo; in patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Global patient safety action plan 2021&ndash;2030: towards eliminating avoidable harm in health care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.</p></li><li><p>Moreno RP, Rhodes A, Donchin Y. ESICM Patient safety in intensive care medicine: the Declaration of Vienna. <I>Intensive Care Med</I>. 2009 Oct;<b>35</b>(10):1667&ndash;72.</p></li><li><p>Donchin Y, Gopher D, Olin M, <I>et al</I>. A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit. <I>Crit Care Med</I>. 1995 Feb;<b>23</b>(2):294&ndash;300.</p></li><li><p>Valentin A, Capuzzo M, Guidet B, <I>et al</I>. Errors in administration of parenteral drugs in intensive care units: multinational prospective study. <I>BMJ</I> 2009 Mar 12;<b>338</b>:b814.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[So, R. K., Bourne, R., Kydonaki, K., Latour, J., Mills, G. H., Neuhaus, C., Ferrando, E. S., Verhage, R., Weiss, B., Zegers, M., Valentin, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.31</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.31</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[31 An international multidisciplinary multimodal learning pathway for patient safety in intensive care medicine: 'everyone teaches, everyone learns!]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A21</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A21</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A24?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[36 Promoting 24-hour postpartum rooming-in to increase exclusive breastfeeding rates]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A24?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>As a baby-friendly hospital, we advocate for 24-hour rooming-in to support breastfeeding.<sup>7</sup> Rooming-in, where the mother and newborn stay together in the same room throughout the postpartum hospital stay, enhances maternal-infant bonding and facilitates breastfeeding.<sup>1</sup> Close proximity allows for timely feeding, aiding milk production and increasing milk supply.<sup>5</sup> However, our hospital's average 24-hour rooming-in rate was 35.0% in 2022 and 39.4% in 2023, indicating room for improvement.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>An investigation identified inconsistencies among nursing staff in implementing rooming-in care and documentation. There was a lack of timely breastfeeding guidance and support, and essential mother-baby care skills such as hand-expressing milk, managing engorgement, and breastfeeding positioning were not consistently practiced.<sup>4</sup> Additionally, nursery staff visits were not aligned with newborn routines, and immediate parental consultation was lacking. Family-specific needs also influenced rooming-in arrangements. The goal was to improve rooming-in care, maintain a 24-hour rooming-in rate of 40.0%, and achieve an exclusive breastfeeding rate of over 60% during the postpartum hospital stay.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>From mid-2023, we introduced a team communication mechanism and an educational campaign to standardize newborn rooming-in records. Three awareness sessions were conducted. A baby-needs poster was displayed in outpatient clinics, delivery rooms, and postpartum wards to help mothers recognize newborn cues and respond appropriately. After initiating the first rooming-in and breastfeeding session, a personalized plan was developed with the mother, with results documented and tracked . Delivery ward bed assignments were optimized to accommodate mothers who wished to breastfeed and room-in, ensuring enhanced support. Simulation training on breastfeeding techniques and communication strategies was provided to nursing staff.<sup>2</sup> Upon first introducing the newborn to the rooming-in ward, mothers were guided on assessing skin color, handling spit-ups, and using suction bulbs.<sup>3</sup> One-on-one breastfeeding assistance was provided, with instructions on contacting nursing staff in case of emergencies. Regular nursing rounds ensured timely support. Newborn bathing, preventive vaccinations, and screenings were conducted in the newborn room.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The promotion of postpartum rooming-in led to an increase in the average 24-hour rooming-in rate to 40.1% from January to June 2024. During this period, experienced nurses provided individualized breastfeeding guidance, addressing mothers' concerns and boosting their confidence. Consequently, the exclusive breastfeeding rate during postpartum hospital stays reached 62.8%. Efforts continue to create a breastfeeding-friendly environment to further increase breastfeeding rates.<sup>6</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Discussion</st><p>The findings suggest that structured educational interventions, improved staff communication, and proactive support mechanisms are effective in increasing rooming-in rates and exclusive breastfeeding success. The implementation of structured nursing training and personalized lactation counseling helped address maternal concerns and enhanced breastfeeding confidence. The alignment of nursery staff visits with newborn routines contributed to a more seamless mother-baby experience, reducing reliance on nursery care and increasing the likelihood of sustained breastfeeding. However, challenges remain. Family-specific factors, such as cultural beliefs, postpartum fatigue, and maternal medical conditions, continue to impact rooming-in participation. Further research is needed to explore additional strategies, such as post-discharge lactation support and telehealth consultations, to reinforce breastfeeding success beyond the hospital stay. Additionally, policies should be refined to ensure that hospital staff are consistently trained and equipped to support all mothers effectively.<sup>2</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>To sustain and improve these outcomes, a regular audit system is required to monitor rooming-in and breastfeeding practices. Strengthening individualized breastfeeding guidance will help mothers master effective techniques, ensuring continued success in rooming-in and exclusive breastfeeding. Keeping mother and baby together enhances bonding, responsiveness to infant needs, and breastfeeding success, ultimately benefiting maternal and neonatal health. Future efforts should focus on long-term support strategies to maintain high breastfeeding rates post-discharge, ensuring lasting health benefits for both mothers and infants<sup>1 8</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Crenshaw JT. Healthy birth practice #6: keep mother and newborn together-it&rsquo;s best for mother, newborn, and breastfeeding. <I>The Journal of Perinatal Education</I> 2019;<b>28</b>(2):108&ndash;115. https://doi.org/10.1891/1058-1243.28.2.108</p></li><li><p>Fair FJ, Morrison A, Soltani H. The impact of baby friendly initiative accreditation: an overview of systematic reviews. <I>Maternal &amp; Child Nutrition</I> 2021;<b>17</b>(4):e13216. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13216</p></li><li><p>Feldman-Winter L, Goldsmith JP, Committee on Fetus and Newborn, Task Force on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. Safe sleep and skin-to-skin care in the neonatal period for healthy term newborns. <I>Pediatrics</I> 2016;<b>138</b>(3):e20161889. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1889</p></li><li><p>Huang YY, Lee JT, Huang CM, Gau ML. Factors related to maternal perception of milk supply while in the hospital. <I>Journal of Nursing Research</I> 2019;<b>27</b>(5):e45. https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0b013e3181b25558</p></li><li><p>Moore ER, Bergman N, Anderson GC, Medley N. Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. <I>Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews</I> 2016;<b>11</b>(11):CD003519. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003519.pub4</p></li><li><p>P&eacute;rez-Escamilla R, Martinez JL, Segura-P&eacute;rez S. Impact of the baby-friendly hospital initiative on breastfeeding and child health outcomes: a systematic review. <I>Maternal &amp; Child Nutrition</I> 2016;<b>12</b>(3):402&ndash;417. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12294</p></li><li><p>World Health Organization &amp; UNICEF. (2018). <I>Implementation guidance: Protecting, promoting and supporting breastfeeding in facilities providing maternity and newborn services: The revised Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative</I>. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/272943</p></li><li><p>Wu HL, Lu DF, Tsay PK. Rooming-in and breastfeeding duration in first-time mothers in a modern postpartum care center. <I>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health</I> 2022;<b>19</b>(18):11790. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811790</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lai, H.-L., I-san, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.36</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.36</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[36 Promoting 24-hour postpartum rooming-in to increase exclusive breastfeeding rates]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A24</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A24</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A1-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[1 Beyond VTE assessment]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A1-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>60% of all VTEs are hospital-associated, costing the NHS approximately &pound;200 million. Therefore Effective, safe and cost-effective measures to follow the standard care and to prevent hospital-acquired VTE exist. 100 patients were included in our study, collected from Acute medical unit (AMU )and medical wards From a period of December 2022 to January 2023 in UHNM ( University Hospital of North Midland) for VTE risk assessment on admission and after 48 hours.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The patient population were screened for VTE assessment on admission and after 48 hours during hospital stay compared against national best practice guidelines<sup>1</sup> published by the UK Health Security Agency (2010). In our study population 61% (n=61)were female, with mean age 71.31, Among the study population 33% (n=33) patients having age &gt;80, 44% (n=44) between 60 to 80, and 17% (n=17) between 40 to 60.</p><p>58% of study population has been admitted with lung infection. serum creatinine, and GFR were 100.86 &micro;mol/L and 57.7 mL/min/1.73m2 respectively. All population study were assessed during their admission for VTE however, no reassessment was done after 48 hours or even during hospital stay provided that none of the study population has contraindications to Anti-coagulation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>VTE risk affects large population each year and can be prevented by simple measures, assessment protocols should be implemented to all patient twice during their hospital stay to review the need to change anti-coagulation dose and avoid the risk of acquiring venous thrombosis and Pulmonary embolism during hospital stay. Measures should be taken to increase awareness of staff team regarding re-assessment of VTE (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>).</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 1 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Showed the risk assessment risk score for venous thromboembolism https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance</p></caption><link locator="1_F1"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Hill J, Treasure T. Reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) in patients admitted to hospital: summary of the NICE guideline. <I>Heart</I> 2010 Jun 1;<b>96</b>(11):879&ndash;82.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ibrahim, M. A., Hussain, A., Subhani, M., Intabli, R., Sohail, A., Hughes, A., Adam, R., Abdelhamid, R., University Hospital of North Midland Acute Medicine Department]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.1</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[1 Beyond VTE assessment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A1</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A1-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2 Improving medical management of patients newly diagnosed with hypertension]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A1-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Problem</st><p>Cardiovascular disease is a major concern of General practitioners in all practices. Hypertension, a significant modifiable risk factor, is often inadequately managed due to insufficient follow-up and patient education, resulting in suboptimal blood pressure (BP) control.</p></sec><sec><st>Strategy for Change</st><p>The project focused on improving hypertension management using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle. Key interventions over 3 cycles included:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Implementing a dedicated BP clinic for newly diagnosed hypertensive patients.</p></li><li><p>Conducting systematic telephone follow-ups and pre-allocating appointments to enhance adherence.</p></li><li><p>Providing comprehensive patient education during appointments.</p></li><li><p>Distributing workload across a multi-disciplinary team, including GPs, pharmacists, and administrative staff.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Measurement of Improvement</st><p>Baseline data indicated that only 60% of newly diagnosed hypertensive patients achieved target BP, with just 10% of those not at target BP receiving a timely review within 4 weeks. The objective was to increase the proportion of patients achieving target BP to 90% within 9 months.</p></sec><sec><st>Effects of Change</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>  <b>Cycle One:</b> Target BP achievement increased from 60.71% to 69.04%, despite challenges with workload and clinic turnout.</p></li><li><p>  <b>Cycle Two:</b> Improved target BP achievement to 76.19% due to better workload distribution.</p></li><li><p>  <b>Cycle Three:</b> Further increased target BP achievement to 84.52%, highlighting the effectiveness of structured follow-ups and team collaboration.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Discussion</st><p>The QI project significantly enhanced the management of newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. Key factors included systematic follow-ups, patient education, and effective team collaboration. Sustaining these changes and applying similar strategies to other chronic disease management areas are essential next steps.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tesfay, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.2</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.2</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2 Improving medical management of patients newly diagnosed with hypertension]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A2</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A2-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3 Implementing a barcode verification management system to reduce errors in targeted drug dispensing: targeted therapy pertuzumab 840 mg dispensing error incident]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A2-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>In 2022, the Taiwan Patient Safety Reporting System (TPR) identified medication-related adverse events as the most frequently reported patient safety incidents in medical institutions, underscoring the critical need for continuous improvements in high-risk medication administration processes. &lsquo;Enhancing medication safety&rsquo; has remained a key annual priority for Taiwan&rsquo;s healthcare institutions.</p><p>This case highlights a medication error involving pertuzumab 840 mg, which has been designated as a priority improvement item for 2024. Following team discussions, an interdisciplinary task force was established to enhance organizational management and implement medication safety barriers. A retrospective Root Cause Analysis (RCA) confirmed that the error stemmed from a failure by the chemotherapy pharmacist to properly execute the double-checking process, resulting in the incorrect dose of pertuzumab 840 mg being dispensed and subsequently administered to the patient by the nurse.</p><p>To mitigate risks, this study introduced interventional measures to enhance barcode scanning technology throughout the medication process. From the physician&rsquo;s prescription to final administration, pharmacists are required to scan barcodes at each stage to track medication flow and ensure patient safety.<sup>1 2</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The medication error occurred once in 2023, with an additional 420 mg (1 vial) dose administered on January 4, 2024. A total of one dispensing error involving targeted therapy medications occurred, representing 0.16% of all targeted drug dispensing events.</p><p>Through data collection and analysis, we investigated medication dosage identification errors that led to dispensing discrepancies, identified proximate causes, confirmed root causes, and developed an improvement plan with effectiveness verification. The interval between consecutive doses was 7 days, and based on the Severity Assessment of Safety Events (SAC),<sup>3</sup> no adverse clinical outcomes were observed.</p><p>In reviewing and identifying protective mechanisms, we analyzed existing barriers, missing barriers, and failed barriers, further exploring the root causes of the error. The analysis revealed five key proximate causes of the error: personnel, process, equipment, environmental, and management factors.</p><p>To prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future, it is necessary to reinforce or introduce new protective mechanisms and develop feasible improvement strategies, such as establishing standardized verification and dispensing procedures. After multiple brainstorming sessions, the team identified that the root cause of each risk point was related to the improper implementation of verification mechanisms within the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). In particular, during busy periods, pharmacists responsible for dispensing medications may only retrieve the medication and hand it over directly, bypassing the critical manual verification step.</p><p>Based on the analysis results, a SMART goal (Specific, Measurable, Ambitious, Realistic, Timely) was set, aiming for a 100% accuracy rate. A PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle was adopted to implement practical solutions to the problem.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The system upgrade effectively ensured prescription accuracy and medication convenience, enhancing collaboration and mutual support among staff, while significantly reducing the burden on clinical nurses during the medication administration process.</p><p>To ensure the effectiveness of the implemented improvements, continuous monitoring and evaluation will be conducted. When measures prove effective, they will be standardized; if not, &lsquo;countermeasures&rsquo; will be implemented, and non-compliance will be addressed through &lsquo;re-education,&rsquo; assessed via practical exercises.</p><p>Since January 2024, the chemotherapy pharmacy has fully integrated barcode scanning technology, achieving a 100% scanning rate. This system plays a critical role in the medication dispensing process, effectively ensuring drug tracking, preventing dispensing errors, improving work efficiency, and enhancing healthcare service quality, while safeguarding patient medication safety.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Janique GJ, Nicole GMH, Joost VR, <I>et al</I>. Effect of automated unit dose dispensing with barcode scanning on medication administration errors: an uncontrolled before-and-after study. <I>Int J Qual Health Care.</I> 2021;<b>33</b>(4):mzab142.</p></li><li><p>Jessurun JG, Hunfeld NGM, Michelle DR,<I> et al</I>. Prevalence and determinants of medication administration errors in clinical wards: a two-centre prospective observational study. <I>J Clin Nur</I>s. 2023;<b>32</b>(1&ndash;2):208&ndash;220.</p></li><li><p>Sephanie NL, Tong L, Jin YJ, <I>et al</I>. Impact of dose delays and alternative dosing regimens on pertuzumab pharmacokinetics. <I>J Clin Pharmacol</I>. 2021;<b>61</b>(8):1096&ndash;1105.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fang, H., Wang, Y.-S., Huang, C.-Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.3</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.3</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3 Implementing a barcode verification management system to reduce errors in targeted drug dispensing: targeted therapy pertuzumab 840 mg dispensing error incident]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A2</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A2</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A2-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4 To reduce quarterly MRSA bacteraemia incidences in general medicine wards]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A2-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>MRSA bacteraemia is one of the more severe forms of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) infection. Diagnosis requires blood cultures that verify MRSA is present in the blood, indicating a systemic infection.<sup>1 2</sup>  </p><p>Our goal is to achieve 50% reduction of quarterly MRSA Bacteraemia incidences in General Medicine wards from mean of 5 to less than 2 in 6 months and sustain over years.</p></sec><sec><st>Definition of MRSA Bacteraemia</st><p>Patients with positive MRSA blood culture of more than 3 calendar days of hospitalisation (the day of admission is day 1), regardless of the screening results prior to the positive blood culture and with repeated blood culture of more than 14 days from the last positive date is counted as new event.</p></sec><sec><st>MRSA Bacteraemia Cases</st><p>There were increasing cases of MRSA bacteraemia in late 2014 and early 2024 in General Medicine Department. The cases peaked in February to April 2015 with 7 cases of MRSA bacteraemia in 3 months and 17 cases from February to July 2024. (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">Figure 1</cross-ref>).</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 4 Figure 1</no><caption><p>MRSA Incidences in GM Wards May 2014- July 2024. Data collected from TTSH Department of Infection Prevention and Control</p></caption><link locator="4_F1"></fig></p><p>Based on the number of votes, the two main root causes are lack of staff education in Hand Hygiene technique and lack of training in procedures. (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">Figure 2</cross-ref>).</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F2"><no>Abstract 4 Figure 2</no><caption><p>Root causes</p></caption><link locator="4_F2"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Strategies and Methodology</st><p>The following strategies were done to reduce MRSA bacteraemia (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F3">figure 3</cross-ref>) by improving staff education on proper Hand Hygiene techniques; staff were trained in procedures such as Peripherally Inserted Central catheter (PICC) blood taking, intravenous cannulation and wound care; regular 3 monthly staff education on MRSA morbidity and mortality as well as reminders on infection prevention strategies; and patient&rsquo;s family was told to adhere to strict hand hygiene procedures in the hospital.<sup>3</sup>  </p><p><fig loc="float" id="F3"><no>Abstract 4 Figure 3</no><caption><p>MRSA Incidences in GM Wards May 2014- September 2024 with Intervention. Data collected from TTSH Department of Infection Prevention and Control</p></caption><link locator="4_F3"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p></p></sec><sec><st>Measurement of improvement</st><p>The MRSA bacteraemia quarterly rates reduced from mean of 5 to less than 2 since May 2018 and was sustained for 1 year as shown in <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F3">figure 3</cross-ref>. But since the 2022&ndash;2023 and 2024, there has been spike of cases. There are always spikes in cases of MRSA in certain periods as shown. This could be due to new junior doctors joining and undergoing training of hand hygiene and aseptic catheter techniques. And poor compliance rates of hand hygiene for doctors and health care staff also correlates with spike in cases in MRSA. MRSA rates increases if hand hygiene rates in wards fall in the wards.<sup>4</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Lesson Learnt</st><p>Hand hygiene is the key for prevention of MRSA infections. Co-ordination between doctors, nursing and infectious disease specialist is important. Training of the doctors to take blood via lines is very critical. Only trained doctors can take blood via lines if needed. Regular education to the junior and senior doctors regarding hand hygiene and blood taking is very important. Sustainability to reduce MRSA bacteraemia is a huge challenge with spike of cases intermittently.<sup>3 4</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Benefits</st><p>Reduced MRSA rates in the ward and hospital---would reduce the recurrent rates of hospitalisation and prolonged stay. Huge cost saving to the hospital. And reduction in hospital bed crunch and availability of beds -due to early discharge of patients. Reduced MRSA rates would also help in better quality of life for the patient and family. Reduce cost to the patient and family and reduction in morbidity and mortality.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Kourtis AP, Hatfield K, Baggs J, Mu Y, See I, Epson E, Nadle J, Kainer MA, Dumyati G, Petit S, <I>et al</I>. Vital Signs: Epidemiology and Recent Trends in Methicillin-Resistant and in Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections&mdash;United States. <I>MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep</I>. 2019;<b>68</b>:214&ndash;219.</p></li><li><p>Bai AD, Lo CK, Komorowski AS, Suresh M, Guo K, Garg A, Tandon P, Senecal J, Del Corpo O, Stefanova I, <I>et al</I>. Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. <I>Clin. Microbiol. Infect.</I> 2022;<b>28</b>:1076&ndash;1084.</p></li><li><p>Calfee DP, Salgado CD, Milstone AM, <I>et al</I>. Strategies to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission and infection in acute-care hospitals: 2014 update. <I>Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.</I> 2014;<b>35</b>:772&ndash;796.</p></li><li><p>Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Singer M, et al. Prevalence and outcomes of infection among patients in intensive care units in 2017. <I>JAMA</I> 2020;<b>323</b>:1478&ndash;1487.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tenorio, E., Sule, A. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.4</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.4</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4 To reduce quarterly MRSA bacteraemia incidences in general medicine wards]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A2</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A4</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A5-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6 Using patient feedback to improve the delivery of anaesthesia for neurosurgery]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A5-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>King&rsquo;s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (KCH) is a major regional centre for neurosurgery based in South-East London. Patients from across the UK and Europe are referred to KCH for specialist intracranial or spinal surgeries. Approximately 3400 neurosurgical operations are performed at King&rsquo;s annually.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>To evaluate the perioperative experience of having neurosurgery at King&rsquo;s, a 22-question patient survey was conducted in October 2022. 74 patients took part in the study. The survey was based on UK Anaesthesia Clinical Services Accreditation (ACSA) standards. It comprised 15 five point rating scales, 1 blank space question and 6 demographic questions. In response to the survey findings, a series of interventions were implemented. 2 years later, in October 2024, the same survey was repeated to see if any improvements had occurred following these interventions. 70 new patients were enrolled in this second study. A snapshot survey of all neurosurgical centres in the UK was also performed to see if they had established an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for neurosurgical patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>12 of the five point rating questions had consistently positive feedback across both cycles. 3 recorded &lt;90% positive responses in the first cycle. 1 of these on anaesthetic choices was removed from the analysis as it was deemed to be misleading. The 2 remaining questions concerned being prepared for the side effects of analgesics and being followed up after the operation. 71% of patients initially felt that the anaesthetist explained the side effects of pain relief drugs before their surgery. Unfortunately, there was no improvement on this number with 69.8% stating the same 2 years later. 82% of patients in 2022 felt that a staff member explained how the operation or procedure had gone after it had taken place. Following the intervention cycle, this number increased to 92.9%. Some demographic groups were more likely to report a negative experience. Non-white (by a factor of 1.15) and female respondents (1.19) were more likely to report a negative experience. Of the 12 trusts that responded to the snapshot survey, just 2 had an ERAS pathway established in neurosurgery.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Preparing patients for a potentially long recovery and the side effects of analgesic drugs remain areas to work on. Work needs to be done towards an improvement in the cultural competence of the department. The promotion of ERAS protocols in neurosurgery could also enhance the patient experience. It is hoped that this project will serve as evidence that patient feedback is an invaluable tool when it comes to shaping the procedures and protocols of an anaesthetic department.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gallaher, J., Adkins, G., Malik, M., Bayliss, E., Burr, J., Connolly, L., Kanji, R., Langdon, A., MacLeod, C., Phillips, R., Pishbin, S., Jones, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.6</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.6</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6 Using patient feedback to improve the delivery of anaesthesia for neurosurgery]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A5</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A5</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A5-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[7 Working in partnership: service user involvement in healthcare regulation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A5-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Ensuring the quality and safety of service delivery extends beyond the realm of health and care professionals, necessitating collaboration among various stakeholders, including external regulatory organizations. The policy agenda of healthcare regulators increasingly features the topic of service user involvement. Despite the extensive research on participatory healthcare, scholarly attention to service user involvement in regulatory practices has been limited. We have conducted and published the findings of a scoping review that delves into the landscape of service user involvement in the regulation of health and care services of all types and for all different age groups, examining the characteristics and focus of peer reviewed original research. In particular, we address a notable knowledge gap by examining how these studies report on the practical utilization of service user input, as well as the regulator&rsquo;s perspective on service user involvement.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We conducted a literature search in PubMed, Embase, Cinahl, APA PsycInfo and Scopus from inception to July 14th 2023. Thirteen (n=13) empirical studies were included.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The underlying motives for service user involvement vary, ranging from legal imperatives and political pressure to enhancing institutional legitimacy and regulatory decision-making. Care regulators employ both reactive and proactive involvement methods. Empirical evidence delineates the challenges and benefits of service user involvement, highlighting concerns about bias, time investments, and the need for a distinct skillset for inspectors. Despite the valuable insights gained, there are instances where service user input is downplayed in practice. We conclude that if the regulator&rsquo;s ambition is to offer users a &lsquo;seat at the table&rsquo; to learn from their experiences and unique perspectives, users must be provided with the room to voice those perspectives and experiences in a manner that does justice to their epistemic contribution. Importantly though, embracing a &lsquo;different perspective&rsquo; requires regulatory organizations to be reflexive of their own interpretative and regulatory frameworks.</p><p>Our analysis underscores the importance of additional research on users&rsquo; preferences for involvement, optimal communication conditions to honor the collected input, and the challenges inspectors encounter in fostering meaningful involvement with service users. Addressing these challenges is crucial for aligning regulatory efforts with the genuine needs and experiences of services users.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kok, J., Palimetaki, F., Akrouh, N., Schoonmade, L., Bovenkamp, H. v. d., Pot, A. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.7</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.7</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[7 Working in partnership: service user involvement in healthcare regulation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A5</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A6</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A6-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[8 Patient perspectives on the implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in the lung cancer consultation room]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A6-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Lung cancer treatment side effects significantly affect patients&lsquo; physical, emotional, and social well-being, necessitating a comprehensive approach that prioritizes both survival and quality of life. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) have potential benefits, yet there is limited evidence supporting their value in real-world settings. We aimed to study the effects of the implementation of PROMs on patient experiences with care and shared decision-making (SDM).</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A survey was conducted between 2021 and 2023, which included several questionnaires: perceived patient-clinician interactions, SDM, patient-centeredness, and a Patient-Reported Experience Measure (PREM). Statistical comparisons of medians and proportions were performed between three groups: &lsquo;no PROMs&rsquo;, &lsquo;PROMs not discussed, and &lsquo;PROMs discussed&rsquo;, based on whether they completed PROMs before the consultation and whether the outcomes were subsequently discussed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 155 patients completed the survey (no PROMs=50; PROMs not discussed=82; PROMs discussed=23). The PROMs discussed group perceived significantly greater patient-centeredness compared to the PROMs not discussed group (median 29 vs 26; <I>p</I>=0.037). They also reported significantly more clinician attention to adverse events (<I>p</I>=.037), improved communication (<I>p</I>=0.019), and experienced that more relevant topics were discussed (<I>p</I>&lt;.001). The PROMs not discussed group felt less involved in SDM compared to the no PROMs group (median 33.5 vs. 37; <I>p</I>=.046).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>This study highlights that the full potential of PROMs is realized only when healthcare professionals engage in discussions about the outcomes during consultations. Merely completing PROMs without follow-up discussions is counterproductive, as it negatively impacts patients&lsquo; perceptions of shared decision-making and their overall experience of care.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Klok, J. M., Hoorn, E. S. v., Klaveren, D. v., Takkenberg, J. J., Hollander, M. S. d., Aerts, J. G., Lingsma, H. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.8</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.8</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[8 Patient perspectives on the implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in the lung cancer consultation room]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A6</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A6</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A6-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[9 Innovations in catheter connection management: addressing the need for a specialized medical device to improve patient safety in cancer care and beyond]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A6-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Every year, millions of patients receive prescribed treatments administered through, or removal/irrigation of bodily fluids extracted from, various catheters (e.g., central venous catheters, feeding tubes, drainage tubes, urinary catheters, or other intravenous administration sets).<sup>1&ndash;4</sup> Management of catheters includes scheduled changes of catheter connections (e.g., medical tubing, needleless claves, catheter bags) as this has shown to decrease contamination risk to patients.<sup>5&ndash;9</sup> While the catheters&rsquo; luer connection has advanced performance of managing catheters by making it easier to connect various catheter components, this advancement has also increased the challenges for manually loosening such connections.<sup>9 10</sup> Initial evidence suggested that this challenge resulted in workarounds that led to damage to the catheter and catheter connections.<sup>11</sup> This impacts healthcare costs associated with repair or replacement of catheters. This also impacts patient safety and wellness, as these patients are at higher risk of healthcare-associated infections.<sup>9 12&ndash;14</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A3 thinking guided our problem solving and decision-making processes.<sup>15</sup> Pilot study activities included problem definition, root cause analysis, and mapping of potential solutions regarding the challenges faced by patients, nurses and family caregivers in disconnecting various catheter connections. We used selective sampling to recruit nurses and worked with the Oley Foundation, a national non-profit organization for those living with central venous catheters (CVCs), to recruit patients and caregivers for focus groups. In the initial pilot study, we surveyed nineteen nurses and conducted two focus group sessions with two nurses, eight patients, and two caregivers.<sup>11</sup> For each focus group, we used a semi-structured guide to gain insight into varied experiences, shared beliefs, challenges, and/or differences in opinions related to management of CVCs. Based on data from the pilot study, we developed the initial prototype and conducted a series of usability sessions with 139 nurses from two academic medical centers to refine the prototype, and to gather additional evidence on previous experiences disconnecting luer connections surveys, including 1) difficulty disconnecting, 2) request for help with disconnecting, and 3) use of an assistive medical device/product to disconnect.<sup>16</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Seventy-nine percent of nurses and 90% of patients and caregivers in the pilot study had experienced challenges with catheter connections, and used workarounds, such as hemostats, clamps and household wrenches. For patients, these challenges often result in a sense of hypervigilance, and lack of independence, as their previous experiences have resulted in bloodstream infections, time in hospital, or time spent traveling to hospital. Most nurses, patients and caregivers indicated they have not received formal training on disconnection processes when challenges arise, relying on ad hoc training to mitigate these challenges. All participants indicated that having access to a specialized device was well received. Currently, no medical device exists to safely disconnect catheter connections, therefore those performing this task must decide between unsafe workarounds or placing patients at higher risk of infection by not changing catheter connections. These workarounds are discouraged in practice, due to damage to both catheters and catheter connections.</p><p>Usability testing further supported the need for a specialized device. Ninety-five percent of nurses in the usability sessions reported previous difficulty with disconnecting luer connections; 93% of those reporting difficulty improvised with off-label medical devices or products to better grip the connected components, and 71% have requested assistance with disconnections. Only 23% of nurses reported receiving adequate training on how to resolve problems with luer connections. Usability testing showed that 86% of nurses are likely to use and recommend this device. Nurses reported high acceptability and consistently asked when it would be available in their departments. Organizational support is essential for providing access to this device. The study indicates several factors to address, including the impact on patient safety, infection control, time spent on tasks, and lack of training. Leadership commitment to a culture of safety, listening to concerns, and deploying process improvement tools can enhance patient safety, helping them achieve recognition as high reliability organizations. Hospitals should consider this study as a first step in understanding the systematic problem with catheter connection management. Hospitals should evaluate the use of this device in clinical settings and provide training to reduce workarounds, lower healthcare costs, and improve patient safety outcomes.</p><p>The specialized device described in this abstract is protected under intellectual property laws and secured by patents, ensuring exclusive rights to its use and development.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Waitt C, Waitt P, Pirmohamed M. Intravenous therapy. <I>Postgrad. Med. J</I>. 2004;<b>80</b>:1&ndash;6.</p></li><li><p>Perry AG, Potter PA, Ostendorf W. Clinical nursing skills and techniques 8th ed; Mosby: Maryland Heights, MI, USA, 2013.</p></li><li><p>Ball M, Singh A. Care of a central line; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022.</p></li><li><p>Nazarko L. Providing effective evidence-based catheter management. <I>Br. J. Nurs</I>. 2009;<b>18</b>:S4&ndash;S12.</p></li><li><p>O&rsquo;Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, <I>et al</I>. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. <I>Clin Infect Dis.</I> 2011;<b>52</b>(9):e162&ndash;93. doi:10.1093/cid/cir257</p></li><li><p>Satou K, Kusanagi R, Nishizawa A, Hori S. Scrubbing technique for needleless connectors to minimize contamination risk. <I>J Hosp Infect.</I> 2018;<b>100</b>(3):e200&ndash;e203. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2018.03.015</p></li><li><p>Marschall J, Mermel LA, Classen D, <I>et al</I>. Strategies to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections in acute care hospitals. <I>Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.</I> 2008;<b>29</b>(Suppl 1):S22&ndash;30. doi:10.1086/591059</p></li><li><p>Urine drainage bags: MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia. Accessed July 6, 2024. https://medlineplus.gov/ency/patientinstructions/000142.htm</p></li><li><p>Nickel B, Gorski L, Kleidon T, <I>et al</I>. Infusion therapy standards of practice, 9th edition. <I>J Infus Nurs.</I> 2024;<b>47</b>(1S Suppl 1):S1&ndash;S285. doi:10.1097/NAN.0000000000000532</p></li><li><p>Weber J, Beck B. Luer-lock connector for medical devices. January 6, 2009.</p></li><li><p>Cole AC. Identifying experiences related to accessing central venous catheters (CVCs)/central lines for treatment infusions and parenteral (IV) nutrition (PN). <I>Oley Foundation</I>. 2023;(Summer 2023):9&ndash;10.</p></li><li><p>Hord JD, Lawlor J, Werner E, <I>et al</I>. Central line associated blood stream infections in pediatric hematology/oncology patients with different types of central lines. <I>Pediatr Blood Cancer</I> 2016;<b>63</b>(9):1603&ndash;1607. doi:10.1002/pbc.26053</p></li><li><p>Jarding EK, Flynn Makic MB. Central line care and management: adopting evidence-based nursing interventions. <I>J Perianesth Nurs.</I> 2021;<b>36</b>(4):328&ndash;333. doi:10.1016/j.jopan.2020.10.010</p></li><li><p>Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) | HAIs | CDC. Accessed July 5, 2024. https://www-cdc-gov.libproxy.lib.unc.edu/healthcare-associated-infections/index.html</p></li><li><p>Harolds JA. Quality and safety in healthcare, part XC: the A3 approach and lean in healthcare. <I>Clin Nucl Med.</I> August 5, 2021. doi:10.1097/RLU.0000000000003851</p></li><li><p>Cole AC, Wiley N, Dalton K, <I>et al</I>. Addressing the need for a specialized disconnection device in catheter connection management: a case study of user-centered medical device innovation. <I>Nurs Rep.</I> 2025;<b>15</b>(2):36. doi:10.3390/nursrep15020036</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cole, A. C., Zebrowski, A., Richardson, D. R., Havill, N., Mazur, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.9</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.9</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[9 Innovations in catheter connection management: addressing the need for a specialized medical device to improve patient safety in cancer care and beyond]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A6</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A7</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A8-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[11 A journey of scents- a proactive care to identify patient with smell impairment]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A8-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the vulnerability of the olfactory system to diseases, as seen in the sudden loss of smell experienced by many patients. Despite this, olfactory function is often overlooked in routine medical care, even in cases of head trauma, post-endoscopic surgery, and brain masses. This oversight emphasizes the need for validated olfactory testing and a proactive, multi-disciplinary approach to care.</p></sec><sec><st>Methodology</st><p>PICOS criteria were utilized. [Problem: patients with hyposmia or anosmia; Intervention: established comprehensive smell test; Comparison: assessing the validity of various smell tests between anosmics and normosmics; Outcome:To provide a comprehensive care with more reliable and objective assessment tool for those patients].</p><p>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases from 2013 to 2023. The search terms included &lsquo;diagnosis of anosmia/hyposmia/smelling disorder&rsquo; and &lsquo;orthonasal test&rsquo; or &lsquo;smell test.&rsquo; Relevant articles were manually screened, and English-language randomized controlled trials were selected. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) was used to analyze the literature review. After eliminating duplicates and non-relevant papers, 11 full-text articles were evaluated based on the eligibility criteria.</p><p>The literature indicates that an ideal smell test should feature diverse and uniformly delivered odorants, use forced multiple-choice responses, and include a rating system to quantify the severity of olfactory deficits. In light of the limitations of the coffee bean test, the &lsquo;4-Item Pocket Smell Test&rsquo; was introduced and piloted in a neurological unit in July 2023. This test was selected for its concise and structured assessment of olfactory function.</p><p>Patients with diagnoses of head trauma, brain tumors, and post-nasal surgery were recruited using convenience sampling, while those with psychiatric conditions or who were not fully conscious were excluded. This initiative aimed to assess the effectiveness of the 4-Item Pocket Smell Test in a clinical context, addressing the need for a more reliable and efficient tool for evaluating olfactory function in neurological patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Result</st><p>The &lsquo;4-Item Pocket Smell Test&rsquo; demonstrated that the recruited patients&mdash;60% with frontal head injuries, 20% with brain tumors, and 20% who had undergone transsphenoidal surgery&mdash;experienced a range of smell disorders affecting either one or both sides. These results aligned with the expected clinical pathophysiology, indicating that the test offered greater sensitivity compared to the traditional coffee bean test.</p><p>A patient satisfaction survey was conducted to assess experiences with nursing care during hospitalization and upon discharge. Following the implementation of our comprehensive, multidisciplinary care plan, patients showed increased awareness of their smell deficits and associated safety concerns. As a result, patient satisfaction levels improved significantly at discharge, reflecting the effectiveness of the care plan in addressing both medical needs and safety concerns.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Early recognition of smell impairment with the use of a comprehensive and accurate olfactory test is crucial in clinical practice, together with a proactive multi-disciplinary care plan, strengthening patients&rsquo; awareness in their affected ADL and providing them with a better hospitalization experience.</p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Ahmedy F, Mazlan M, Danaee M, Abu Bakar MZ. Post-traumatic brain injury olfactory dysfunction: factors influencing quality of life. <I>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</I>. 2020;<b>277</b>:1343&ndash;51 doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05823-0</p></li><li><p>De Luca R, Bonanno M, Rifici C, Quartarone A, Calabr&ograve; RS. Post-traumatic olfactory dysfunction: a scoping review of assessment and rehabilitation approaches. <I>Front Neurol</I>. 2023 Jul 13;<b>14</b>:1193406 doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023;1193406. PMID: 37521284; PMCID: PMC10374209.</p></li><li><p>Langdon C, Laxe S, Lehrer E, Berenguer J, Alobid I, Quint&oacute; L, Mari&ntilde;o-S&aacute;nchez F, Bernabeu M, Marin C, Mullol J. Loss of smell in patients with traumatic brain injury is associated with neuropsychiatric behavioral alterations. <I>Brain Inj</I>. 2021 Sep 19;<b>35</b>(11):1418&ndash;1424. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2021.1972447. Epub 2021 Sep 8. PMID: 34495793.</p></li><li><p>Lawrence AS, Alapati R, Wagoner SF, Nieves AB, Bird C, Wright R, Jafri S, Rippee M, Villwock JA. Evaluating olfactory function and quality of life in patients with traumatic brain injury. <I>Int Forum Allergy Rhinol</I> 2024 Aug;<b>14</b>(8):1391&ndash;1394. doi: 10.1002/alr.23353. Epub 2024 Apr 14. PMID: 38616565.</p></li><li><p>Parma V, Hannum ME, O&rsquo;Leary M, Pellegrino R, Rawson NE, Reed DR, Dalton PH. SCENTinel 1.0: development of a rapid test to screen for smell loss. <I>Chem Senses</I> 2021 Jan 1;<b>46</b>:bjab012. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjab012. PMID: 33773496; PMCID: PMC8083606.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fok, K., Ng, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.11</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.11</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[11 A journey of scents- a proactive care to identify patient with smell impairment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A8</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A8</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A8-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[12 Disease acceptance and control from the she-model to guide healthcare personalization for immunological disorders]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A8-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>In 2020, the rheumatology, dermatology, and gastroenterology departments at Frisius MC launched a project aimed at enhancing supportive care for patients receiving immunological treatments. The initiative focuses on delivering more personalised care, monitoring healthcare outcomes in real time, and integrating these outcomes into patient consultations to improve quality of care and patient engagement. This abstract presents the initial phase of the project, which involves identifying patients&lsquo; needs and determining appropriate supportive measures through qualitative research.</p><p>The Subjective Health Experience (SHE) model, developed by Bloem and Stalpers, serves as the conceptual framework for this study (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>). Patients are categorised into four segments based on disease acceptance and perceived control, assessed through six structured questions. Each segment defines distinct support needs, forming the basis for tailored interventions. Given that health perception and control are dynamic, patients may transition between segments over time, necessitating adaptive support strategies. As the SHE model provides a structured approach for tailored care, this study aims to adapt the model to better address the specific needs of patients with immunological disorders.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 12 Figure 1</no><caption><p>SHE-model based on bloem &amp; stalpers</p></caption><link locator="12_F1"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>This qualitative study was conducted at Frisius MC, involving group discussions and individual interviews with both healthcare professionals and patients with immunological conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis/spondyloarthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, and psoriasis/hidradenitis suppurativa. Participants were recruited by physicians from the three departments through personal invitations and email communication.</p><p>All discussions and interviews followed a structured guide and were moderated by an experienced facilitator. Participants were asked to describe each segment in terms of patient behaviours, key concerns, and support needs. Additionally, they outlined the types of support currently provided at Frisius MC and identified optimal supportive strategies for each segment. Patients were also encouraged to reflect on their own condition and health experiences. The data were analysed using the Matrix method (Groenland).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 19 healthcare professionals and 18 patients participated in the study. For each SHE segment, a structured overview was developed, detailing the recommended types of care and delivery methods. The findings were independent of diagnosis, allowing them to be consolidated into a single framework.</p><p>A notable difference emerged between patients and healthcare providers in their perspectives on supportive care. Patients emphasised the quality of interaction with healthcare providers, valuing attention, acknowledgment, and empathetic communication. In contrast, healthcare providers primarily focused on the content of the treatment plan.</p><p>Patients in high-acceptance segments (1 and 2) were characterised as proactive and actively involved in decision-making, taking initiative in identifying support needs. Their interactions with healthcare providers were more reciprocal, facilitating shared decision-making. In contrast, individuals in lower-acceptance segments (3 and 4) exhibited low initiative and motivation. These patients required more structured guidance in accessing suitable support, aligning with a guided decision-making approach.</p><p>The SHE model provides practical tools for personalising supportive care for patients with immunological conditions. Additionally, it offers a structured method for identifying patients best suited for either shared or guided decision-making. The key elements in effective supportive care are attention, acknowledgment, and active listening.</p><p>The findings from this study will inform subsequent project phases, including determining relevant disease-specific and general quality-of-life measures for clinical practice (quantitative panel research) and developing and implementing guidelines to personalise care in clinical settings.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Folkertsma, T. S., Bos, R., Vodegel, R. M., Bloem, S., Liefveld, A. R., Tack, G. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.12</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.12</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[12 Disease acceptance and control from the she-model to guide healthcare personalization for immunological disorders]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A8</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A9</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A10-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[13 VTE prophylaxis in general medicine patients: a quality improvement initiative]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A10-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Acutely ill medical patients account for ~60% of all hospital admissions<sup>1</sup> and for 3/4 of the fatal Pulmonary Embolus (PE) events occurring in the hospital. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis remains substantially underutilized in medical patients.<sup>2</sup> Non-surgical discipline admitted patients are less likely to receive prophylaxis compared to surgical discipline admitted patients.<sup>3</sup> Furthermore, recent studies show that up to 2/3 of medical patients do not receive appropriate thromboprophylaxis<sup>4 5</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>High risk General Medicine(GM) patients admitted over a 6-month period to level 5 medical wards were individually assessed with a new concise scoring form. Where indicated, high scoring patients were counselled for and initiated on VTE Prophylaxis.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>After screening nearly 50 patients, the prophylaxis was only given in 4 patients as most of the patients had bleeding risks and thus met exclusion criteria. Of the 4 patients with chemical prophylaxis administered, 2 patients who sustained bleeding complications of haematuria and hemoptysis. This led us to the conclusion that risks of bleeding in GM patients who received prophylaxis is high in Asian settings. Likely, this is the major reason why GM physicians tend to avoid chemical prophylaxis and priotise mechanical prophylaxis which is safer and preferred over chemical prophylaxis</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Cohen AT. <I>Semin Thromb Hemost</I> 2002;<b>28</b>:S3:13&ndash;7.</p></li><li><p>Sandler DA, <I>et al. J R Soc Med</I> 1989;<b>82</b>(4):203&ndash;5.</p></li><li><p>Goldhaber SZ. <I>Am J Cardiol.</I> 2004;<b>93</b>:259&ndash;262.</p></li><li><p>Ageno W, <I>et al. Haematologica</I> 2002;<b>87</b>(7):746&ndash;50.</p></li><li><p>Bergmann JF, <I>et al. Semin Thromb Hemost</I> 2002;<b>28</b>(S3):51&ndash;5.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, L. T., Khien, L. H., Cheng, J., Bakar, F. B. A., Obnial, E. M., Ponnusamy, N., Zhuang, B., Sule, A. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.13</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.13</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[13 VTE prophylaxis in general medicine patients: a quality improvement initiative]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A10</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A10</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A10-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[14 A decade of progress: examining principal patient safety issues and accreditation trends over 10 years]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A10-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Accreditation has long been acknowledged as one of the oldest and most widely adopted tools for strategic external quality assessment in the healthcare sector. Its influence significantly extends into the realm of patient safety culture, where research indicates a positive correlation between accreditation processes and enhanced health outcomes for patients. The implementation of accreditation not only fosters improvements in patient safety measures but also drives advancements in clinical performance across healthcare institutions.<sup>1</sup> The Royal Hospital in Oman provides a compelling case study, having successfully undergone three cycles of accreditation over the past decade. These rigorous evaluations have culminated in detailed reports focusing on critical aspects of healthcare, particularly the primary patient safety issues of Safety Culture, Communication, Medication Use, Worklife, Infection Control, and Risk Assessment.</p><p>This study aims to illuminate trends and developments in patient safety throughout the hospital&rsquo;s decade-long accreditation journey, utilizing insights from three significant reports published in 2016, 2019, and 2023. By conducting a comprehensive review of these documents, this analysis highlights the substantial progress made in patient safety initiatives at the Royal Hospital. It underscores the vital link between adherence to accreditation standards and the enhancement of healthcare outcomes, offering valuable insights into how systematic evaluation and continuous improvement can contribute to a safer and more effective healthcare system.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This study employs a comprehensive document review method to analyze three accreditation reports from the Royal Hospital in Oman published in 2016, 2019, and 2023. By systematically evaluating these reports, the research identifies trends and developments in patient safety initiatives over the hospital&rsquo;s decade-long accreditation journey. Key focus areas include Safety Culture, Communication, Medication Use, Worklife, Infection Control, and Risk Assessment. The findings emphasize the correlation between adherence to accreditation standards and improvements in healthcare outcomes.<sup>2&ndash;4</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The data from 2016 to 2023 illustrates notable trends in key patient safety areas within the organization. Firstly, the commitment to fostering a positive safety culture has significantly improved, skyrocketing from 80% in 2019 to a remarkable 100% in 2023. Communication practices have remained consistent, maintaining an impressive score of 83% throughout the same period. In the critical area of medication use, following a decline to 66% in 2019, there has been a marked recovery to 83% by 2023, indicating enhanced management processes for medication safety. Work-life balance for staff experienced fluctuations, dropping to 60% in 2019 but rebounding to 80% in 2023, highlighting ongoing efforts to improve this aspect. Infection control achieved outstanding results, with a consistent score of 100% in both 2019 and 2023, showcasing effective infection prevention protocols. Finally, risk assessment also reached 100% by 2023, reflecting a strong focus on managing and assessing risks effectively, contributing positively to overall patient safety outcomes as shown in <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 14 Figure 1</no><link locator="14_F1"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Hussein, <I>et al</I>. The impact of hospital accreditation on the quality of healthcare: a systematic literature review. <I>In BMC Health Services Research</I> 2021;<b>21</b>:1057 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07097-6</p></li><li><p>Accreditation report. (2016) Accreditation Canada International.</p></li><li><p>Accreditation report. (2019) Accreditation Canada International.</p></li><li><p>Accreditation report. (2023) Accreditation Canada International.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Naabi, H. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.14</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.14</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[14 A decade of progress: examining principal patient safety issues and accreditation trends over 10 years]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A10</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A11</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A12-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[16 Frailty focus: empowering rural health with advanced nurse practitioners (ANP)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A12-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Frailty is a multidimensional condition with syndromes relating to falls, immobility, incontinence, impaired memory and medication side-effects. With increasing numbers of frailty, particularly in rural areas, healthcare systems are being challenged globally. Moreover, frailty may be more common in rural communities as a consequence of transportation issues, limited access to healthcare services and health promotion activities. ANPs are ideally placed to undertake comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGA) and identify frailly syndromes.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Explore the function of the ANP in managing people living with frailty in rural areas, considering public health agendas and evidence-based practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods or Approach</st><p>The aim is to explore the literature to determine the value of the ANP in managing frailty for people living in rural areas.</p></sec><sec><st>Key Learnings</st><p>Frailty is linked to poorer health outcomes, an excessive use of health resources and decreased quality of life when compared to the non-frail population. Research indicates that incorporating ANPs into integrated models of care and health improvement strategies, improves patient outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Using advanced clinical and decision-making skills, ANPs deliver evidence-based care to improve patient safety and health outcomes. Creating partnerships to enhance the provision of healthcare, they are focused on frailty prevention, detection and providing appropriate support, and the development of co-produced management plans to address individualised needs. The ANP within district nursing has the ability to practice autonomously within an expanded scope of clinical practice, making them the ideal professional to support people living with frailty in rural areas.</p></sec><sec><st>Significance</st><p>When thinking about future strategies for advanced practice, it is important to acknowledge the lack of regulation, inadequate title protection, role variability, and different educational requirements. Organisations need to consider the enablers and barriers of ANPs fulfilling their duties. ANPs are guided by public health agendas to improve the population health of those in rural areas.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Betts, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.16</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.16</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[16 Frailty focus: empowering rural health with advanced nurse practitioners (ANP)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A12</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A12</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A12-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[17 Investigations of patients newly diagnosed with hypertension]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A12-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Hypertension is a common chronic condition that significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, stroke, and kidney damage if left untreated.</p><p>In England, it affects approximately 31% of men and 26% of women, making its early diagnosis and management a priority in primary care.</p><p>NICE guidelines recommend a series of baseline investigations within four weeks of diagnosis to assess end-organ damage, evaluate cardiovascular risk, and guide treatment decisions.<sup>1</sup>  </p><p>Ensuring timely completion of these investigations is essential for optimizing patient outcomes and preventing long-term complications. This audit aimed to evaluate adherence to these guidelines and identify areas for improvement in clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>A retrospective audit was conducted using SystmOne (A clinical electronic patient recording system used in UK) to review the records of patients diagnosed with hypertension between January and February 2023.</p><p>A total of 20 patients were identified with the assistance of the QOF (quality outcomes frame) team.</p><p>Data were collected on whether key investigations&mdash;including blood tests, urine dipstick, urine albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR), ECG, QRISK-2 score, and fundoscopy&mdash;were completed within the recommended timeframe.</p><p>Following the initial findings, an intervention was implemented, including a practice meeting to raise awareness and a visual reminder for clinicians. A re-audit was then conducted to assess improvements.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The initial audit revealed good adherence to blood testing (95%) but lower compliance with other investigations, such as urine ACR (50%), ECG (45%), and fundoscopy (0%).</p><p>Following the intervention, a re-audit demonstrated improvements, with 100% of patients receiving blood tests, 60% completing urine ACR, 66.6% undergoing ECG, and 40% having fundoscopy.</p><p>These findings highlight the impact of simple, targeted measures in improving adherence to national guidelines and enhancing the quality of care for hypertensive patients. Continued efforts are needed to sustain and further improve compliance.</p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>NICE (2022). <I>Hypertension in adults: diagnosis and management</I>. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">https://www.nice.org.uk</inter-ref>  </p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aref, A., Aboueldahab, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.17</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.17</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[17 Investigations of patients newly diagnosed with hypertension]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A12</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A12</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A12-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[18 Sputum induction procedure in isolation wards]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A12-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Since 2013, sputum induction (SI) service was setup by physiotherapist (PT) in Ward 68 and Ward 58 isolation wards. SI is a technique used to collect sputum specimen from patients who are non-productive cough and unable to produce sputum spontaneously. This service is established to aid the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) in patients who are unable to produce sputum spontaneously or are unable to expectorate adequate sputum specimens. However, there are delays in getting those sputum specimens and diagnosing confirmed TB cases, which causes extended hospitalization stay for patient with suspected PTB in Isolation Wards and more financial costs are incurred to patients. The team aims to review the SI service to shorten the time taken to collect the sputum specimen and decreasing the length of stay.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Based on root causes identified using decision matrix, the team decided to focus on the following problems:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Unable to induced sputum over weekend due to insufficient staffing from physiotherapy department.</p></li><li><p>Limited sputum induction machines and accessories.</p></li></l></p><p>The nursing team decided to take over the SI service from physiotherapist and review the workflow of the SI procedure. Refer to Figure 2 for the proposed workflow.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>From May 2017 &ndash; February 2018, there is an increase of 15 cases of sputum induction were performed per month. Nurse (SN and above) can perform the SI procedure independently and help to improve the following:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Reduce delay in diagnosing TB as shorten the waiting time for SI &amp;CircleTimes;TB lab technician will expedite result from Isolation wards.</p></li><li><p>Shorten length of stay in Isolation wards (&lt;3 days) &amp;CircleTimes; Reduce hospital bills due to higher isolation bed charges.</p></li><li><p>Early initiation of TB medication after diagnose TB &amp;CircleTimes; Reduce medical cost incurred.</p></li><li><p>Sending the accessories to CSSD for disinfection (Turnover &lt;24 hours) &amp;CircleTimes; maximize utilization of SI equipment (More cases can be done in a day).</p></li><li><p>Empowerment to RN to initiate sputum induction.</p></li><li><p>The average LOS was reduced from 4.4 to 2.5.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zainuddin, Z. B., Pei Zhi, B. C., Ming Jin, A. G., Xiaojing, L., Tai Lee, M. K., Geck, T. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.18</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.18</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[18 Sputum induction procedure in isolation wards]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A12</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A13</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A13-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[19 Prehabilitation in open gynecologic oncology procedures and radical cystectomy: a pathway to better outcomes and cost savings]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A13-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>As the surgical population ages, the risk of post-operative complications rises, highlighting the need for effective reduction strategies. Prehabilitation, a multimodal optimization program, seeks to reduce post-operative complications and enhance patient satisfaction. However, its cost-effectiveness and optimal implementation strategies remain unclear.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This study evaluated patients undergoing major gynecologic-oncology (N = 154) and radical cystectomy procedures (N = 62) at Vancouver General Hospital (VGH) in British Columbia, Canada, from 2017&ndash;2020. The prehabilitation in this study is part of the Surgical Patient Optimization Collaborative (SPOC), which promotes preoperative optimization across British Columbia. Our site selected seven of the 13 potential clinical components for preoptimization: smoking, anemia, diabetes, sleep apnea, nutrition, pain, and cardiovascular disease. Patients were identified preoperatively through surgical screening questionaries and promptly referred to management or treatment programs. Cost analysis used NSQIP and CIHI data, comparing prehabilitation patients to a matched control group while accounting for implementation costs (SPOC).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Prehabilitation reduced costs by $480 per gynecologic-oncology patient, primarily by lowering readmissions and reoperations. For radical cystectomy, savings were $5,626 per patient, largely from reduced same-stay complications. Implementation prehabilitation costs for this study were estimated at $250, due to pre-existing programs. Assuming an optimization rate of 75%, annual net savings at VGH are estimated at $43,054 for gynecologic oncology and $342,741 for radical cystectomy procedures. Additionally, 75% of patients reported improved surgical experiences.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Prehabilitation enhances patient experience, reduces complications, and provides substantial cost savings, supporting its integration into surgical care pathways. These findings underscore its potential for broader adoption in preoperative optimization efforts.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Barberan-Garcia A, Ubre M, Pascual-Argente N, <I>et al</I>. Post-discharge impact and cost-consequence analysis of prehabilitation in high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: secondary results from a randomised controlled trial. <I>British Journal of Anaesthesia</I> 2019;<b>123</b>(4):450&ndash;456.</p></li><li><p>Gillis C, Ljungqvist O, Carli F. Prehabilitation, enhanced recovery after surgery, or both? A narrative review. <I>British Journal of Anaesthesia</I> 2022;<b>128</b>(3).</p></li><li><p>McIsaac DI, Gill M, Boland L, <I>et al</I>. Prehabilitation in adult patients undergoing surgery: an umbrella review of systematic reviews. <I>British Journal of Anaesthesia</I> 2022;<b>128</b>(2):244&ndash;257.</p></li><li><p>Metzner M, Mayson K, Schierbeck G, Wallace T. The implementation of preoperative optimization in British Columbia: a quality improvement initiative. <I>Can J Anaesth</I>. 2024;<b>71</b>(12):1672&ndash;1684.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frewin, T., Edmond, H., Mayson, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.19</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.19</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[19 Prehabilitation in open gynecologic oncology procedures and radical cystectomy: a pathway to better outcomes and cost savings]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A13</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A13</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A13-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[20 Improving junior doctors knowledge and safe prescribing practices for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs): a quality improvement project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A13-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) have become the preferred choice for anticoagulation therapy due to their ease of use and favourable safety profile. However, proper understanding of their prescribing practices is crucial to ensuring patient safety and effective treatment. Junior doctors, being at the forefront of prescribing medications, play a key role in the safe use of DOACs. This quality improvement project aimed to assess and improve the knowledge of junior doctors regarding the safe prescription and management of DOACs, with a focus on risk assessment, baseline investigations, and reversal agents.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This quality improvement project was conducted in two cycles. In the first cycle (Cycle 1), a structured questionnaire was developed to assess junior doctors&rsquo; understanding of DOACs, including aspects such as risk assessment, baseline investigations, appropriate monitoring, and the use of reversal agents. All junior doctors, including FY1, FY2, SHO, and SPR, were invited to participate in the questionnaire. After analysing the results, an educational intervention was conducted, which included an informative session and distribution of a detailed information leaflet summarizing the key points about DOACs. In Cycle 2, a follow-up questionnaire was administered to the same group of junior doctors to assess improvements in their knowledge after the educational intervention. Data from both cycles were analysed to evaluate knowledge gaps and measure improvements.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In Cycle 1, 28 responses were collected, with 78.6% participation from SHO doctors. In Cycle 2, 25 responses were obtained, representing 72% of SHO doctors. Analysis revealed significant improvements in junior doctors&rsquo; knowledge across several key areas, including risk assessment (42% to 76%), follow-up for normal liver function tests/renal function (7% to 64%), and reversal agents for DOACs (25% to 68% for Apixaban/Rivaroxaban in cases of GI Bleed). Other areas of improvement included creatine clearance cut-offs for DOAC use (28% to 72%) and follow-up for abnormal liver function tests/renal function (14% to 80%). Overall, the educational intervention resulted in a notable increase in correct responses, demonstrating improved understanding of DOAC management.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The quality improvement project successfully enhanced the knowledge of junior doctors regarding the safe prescription and management of DOACs. The educational intervention led to significant improvements in key areas, highlighting the value of targeted educational initiatives in improving clinical practices. Ongoing educational efforts are recommended to address any remaining gaps and ensure safe prescribing practices for DOACs among junior doctors.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anis, S., Rafai, I., Javed, S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.20</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.20</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[20 Improving junior doctors knowledge and safe prescribing practices for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs): a quality improvement project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A13</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A14</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A18-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[24 An analysis of the electronic patient pass referral system for liaison neurology in Manchester]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A18-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Timely access to neurology expertise is critical for inpatient care, yet variation in referral response times and consultant engagement persists.<sup>1&ndash;5</sup> Patient Pass (PP) is an electronic referral system designed to streamline neurology consultations across 12 hospitals in Greater Manchester. This study evaluates PP&rsquo;s impact on referral efficiency, hospital variation, and consultant decision-making.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A retrospective, multi-centre service evaluation analysed 658 inpatient neurology referrals recorded via PP over two months (March&ndash;May 2022). Data were extracted on referral volume, consultant response mode (PP vs. in-person), and time to first response. Twenty-seven consultant neurologists were assessed, and hospital-level variation in PP usage was compared.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Overall, 39.5% of referrals were managed remotely via PP, while 60.5% required in-person assessment. PP utilization varied significantly between hospitals, ranging from 11.1% to 100%. Hospitals with higher PP usage generally had shorter response times. The mean response time was 3607 minutes, with Oldham having the shortest (1160 minutes) and Fairfield the longest (8808 minutes). Consultant engagement also varied, with some managing over 85% of referrals remotely, while others relied predominantly on physical assessment.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>PP improves neurology consultation efficiency by reducing response times, minimizing unnecessary assessments, and optimizing care. Standardizing its use could streamline referrals, enhance resource allocation, and improve patient outcomes.<sup>6</sup> However, adoption varies across hospitals and consultants, highlighting barriers to implementation.<sup>1 2 7 8</sup> Further research is needed to assess long-term impact and explore its role in a national e-referral system.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Feigin VL, Nichols E, Alam T, Bannick MS, Beghi E, Blake N, Culpepper WJ, Dorsey ER, Elbaz A, Ellenbogen RG, Fisher JL, Fitzmaurice C, Giussani G, Glennie L, James SL, Johnson CO, Kassebaum NJ, Logroscino G, Marin B, ... Vos T. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990&ndash;2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. <I>The Lancet. Neurology</I> 2019;<b>18</b>(5):459. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30499-X</p></li><li><p>The Neurological Alliance. (2018). The long term plan for the NHS: getting it right for neurology patients. 1&ndash;27. https://www.neural.org.uk/assets/pdfs/2018-08-long-term-plan-for-nhs.pdf</p></li><li><p>The Neurological Alliance. (2004). Neuro numbers. In Neuro numbers (Issue March).</p></li><li><p>Stevens DL. Appendix A: neurology in the United Kingdom&ndash;numbers of clinical neurologists and trainees. <I>Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery &amp; Psychiatry</I> 1997;<b>63</b>(suppl 1):S67&ndash;S72. https://doi.org/10.1136/JNNP.63.2008.67S</p></li><li><p>Broderick N, Farrell C, &amp; Tubridy N. Should we call the neurologist? The value and cost of a growing neurology consultation service. <I>Irish Journal of Medical Science</I> 2016;<b>185</b>(3):611&ndash;616. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11845-015-1317-2/TABLES/5</p></li><li><p>Costelloe L, O&rsquo;Rourke D, Monaghan TS, McCarthy AJ, McCormack R, Kinsella JA, Smith A, Murphy RP, McCabe DJH, H McCabe DJ. Liaison neurologists facilitate accurate neurological diagnosis and management, resulting in substantial savings in the cost of inpatient care. <I>Ir J Med Sci.</I> 2011;<b>180</b>(2):395&ndash;399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-010-0555-6</p></li><li><p>Fuller GN. Improving liaison neurology services. 2020;<b>20</b>(6):494&ndash;498. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32878965/</p></li><li><p>Douglas MR, Peake D, Sturman SG, Sivaguru A, Clarke CE, Nicholl DJ. The inpatient neurology consultation service: value and cost. <I>Clinical Medicine</I> 2011;<b>11</b>(3):215&ndash;217. https://doi.org/10.7861/CLINMEDICINE.11-3-215</p></li><li><p>Bennett K, de Boisanger L, Moreton F, Davenport R, Stone J. The safety of using active triage to provide advice rather than a face-to-face neurology outpatient appointment. <I>The Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh</I> 2019;<b>49</b>(3):193&ndash;198. https://doi.org/10.4997/JRCPE.2019.305</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khanna, R., McKee, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.24</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.24</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[24 An analysis of the electronic patient pass referral system for liaison neurology in Manchester]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A18</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A18</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A18-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[25 From bustle to brilliance: transforming one of the busiest non-academic hospitals into an academic center and its impact on quality of care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A18-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The conversion of a non-teaching hospital into an academic institution that prioritizes both patient care and resident satisfaction is a multifaceted process, and its effectiveness is debated in medical literature. While studies emphasize key elements such as providing adequate resident education, ensuring high-quality patient care, and managing stress levels among medical staff, there&rsquo;s inadequate information on strategically assigning specific floors to resident teams. This geolocation process could potentially create a more collaborative teaching environment, all while simultaneously enhancing patient care and quality metrics.</p><p>Although there isn&rsquo;t a uniform approach in every hospital system, it&rsquo;s evident that a successful strategy should be comprehensive with considerations of both educational and clinical outcomes. The question arises: Is there a successful approach to transition effectively to a major academic center that prioritizes the quality of patient care and resident education?</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Three inpatient rounding teams were organized to care for their assigned units. Each resident team actively engages in multidisciplinary rounds, which is a crucial component that involves collaborative discussions preceding the attending rounds. These multidisciplinary rounds foster a cooperative environment, bringing together professionals from nursing units, dietary, social work, pharmacy, and physical therapy departments. This approach is designed to optimize closed-loop communication, enhance transitions of care, and establish improved continuity of care for the patients within their respective spheres.</p><p>The research aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the recently implemented geolocation program through the analysis of several key variables. Specifically, the length of stay (LOS) in the geolocated unit was scrutinized over two distinct periods: January to June (before the introduction of the geolocation system) and July to November (following the implementation).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Preliminary findings revealed a decrease in LOS from 5.32 days (January to June) to 4.5 days (July to November), suggesting a potential positive impact of the geolocation program on patient stay durations. In parallel, two medical-surgical floors lacking resident physician care were also subjected to analysis regarding patient LOS. The computed average LOS for these floors was 5.3 and 5.15, respectively. The additional quantitative data regarding the adjusted length of stay, the severity of illness, the impact on nursing staff, and the risk of mortality have yet to be acquired and will be subject to subsequent analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Centralization served as a catalyst for cultivating a cohesive care environment, emphasizing teamwork, familiarity, and rapid response. The model emphasized the pivotal role of proximity, communication, and collaborative care in optimizing patient outcomes, as well as enhancing the overall resident training experience. Insights gathered from such investigations could offer invaluable guidance for the widespread adoption and refinement of this model across other residency programs, ultimately contributing to the elevation of the standard of care.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Maniaci MJ, Dawson NL, Cowart JB, Richie EM, Suryaprasad AG, Hodge DO, Joyce NE, Kernan CA, Stone LA, Burton MC. Goal-directed achievement through geographic location (GAGL) reduces patient length of stay and adverse events. <I>American Journal of Medical Quality</I> 2019;<b>35</b>(4):323&ndash;329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860619879977</p></li><li><p>O&rsquo;Leary, Wayne DB, Landler MP, Kulkarni N, Haviley C, Hahn KJ, Jeon J, Englert KM, Williams MV. Impact of localizing physicians to hospital units on nurse&mdash;physician communication and agreement on the plan of care. <I>Journal of General Internal Medicine: JGIM</I> 2009;<b>24</b>(11):1223&ndash;1227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1113-7</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tsai, J., Carralero-Somoza, D., Rivera Martinez, J. C., Patel, V., Lugo Rosado, L. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.25</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.25</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[25 From bustle to brilliance: transforming one of the busiest non-academic hospitals into an academic center and its impact on quality of care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A18</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A19</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A19-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[26 Gaming in healthcare: all teach, all learn in multidisciplinary teams]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A19-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Innovation and quality improvement are each day topics in intensive care medicine. While online learning modules and classroom based presentations are often used to provide education, we aimed to examine the effect of game-based learning by an escape room.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>Three separate rooms where build for each specialism (ventilation, circulation and renal). Participants of the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) team were divided into multidisciplinary groups. Post-escape room outcomes were assessed by using interviews.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A brief summary of the results of the interviews:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Participants thoroughly enjoyed the experience and mentioned they gained valuable insights</p></li><li><p>The escape room is an effective educational tool that enhances learning</p></li><li><p>It encourages teamwork and promotes building on each other&rsquo;s knowledge throughout the game</p></li><li><p>While the efficiency of theoretical learning is limited, it helps participant recognize their own knowledge gaps</p></li><li><p>Awareness of these gaps motivates participants to actively seek out information to fill them afterward</p></li><li><p>It serves as a strong incentive to revisit materials and review protocols</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The biggest change is that the participants learned to communicate, to rely on each other&rsquo;s knowledge and became aware of the gaps in their knowledge. We speculate that this can improve psychological safety in teams and thus prevent adverse events at a high risk ICU department.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van Berkel, J., Theunisse, C., van der Mee, V., Rijsdijk, W., Hardenbol, E., Wilschut, E., van Wijk, P., Hoksbergen, S., So, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.26</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.26</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[26 Gaming in healthcare: all teach, all learn in multidisciplinary teams]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A19</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A19-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[27 Bringing quality and finance together - evaluating cost impact of quality improvement work]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A19-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Evaluating the financial impact of improvement initiatives in healthcare systems is essential for their effectiveness. By understanding the costs and benefits of each project, managers make more informed choices, aligning investments with desired outcomes. This not only maximizes the efficient use of resources but also strengthens the healthcare system&rsquo;s ability to address emerging needs. Incorporating detailed financial analyses in the planning and execution of improvements is a necessary approach.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Developing a robust financial impact analysis for healthcare improvement initiatives presents significant challenges. Often, the data required for such analyses are fragmented or incomplete, hindering precise evaluation of direct and indirect costs, as well as long-term benefits. Moreover, variability in healthcare costs and diverse clinical outcomes across different populations demand sophisticated and adaptable models. Another barrier is organizational resistance to change, where established practices and culture may limit the adoption of new evidence-based financial approaches. Addressing these difficulties requires ongoing dedication to enhancing analytical skills and fostering an organizational culture that values and utilizes financial data in decision-making.</p><p>Through applying a systematic framework for evaluation return on investment, it is possible to equip staff with the tools needed to overcome these challenges and implement effective financial analyses in their own improvement projects.</p><p>Using the example of a quality improvement project on reducing bloodstream infections in an ICU (a common challenge for many healthcare organizations), key data such as the investment value in this project, current infection rate, and cost of treating infections will be required. Based on this information, two guiding questions for those involved in quality improvement are: 1) How could you lay out the business case for this project? 2) Can you develop a cost evaluation of the impact of this work?</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>&Oslash;vretveit J. (2009). Does improving quality save money? A review of evidence of which improvements to quality reduce costs to health service providers. London: the Health Foundation.</p></li><li><p>Swensen SJ, Dilling JA, Mc Carty PM, Bolton JW, Harper CM. The business case for health-care quality improvement. <I>J Patient Saf</I>. 2013 Mar;<b>9</b>(1):44&ndash;52. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182753e33. PMID: 23429226.</p></li><li><p>Shah A, Course S. Building the business case for quality improvement: a framework for evaluating return on investment. <I>Future Healthc J</I>. 2018 Jun;<b>5</b>(2):132&ndash;137. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.5-2-132. PMID: 31098548; PMCID: PMC6502557.</p></li><li><p>Martin LA, Neumann CW, Mountford J, Bisognano M, Nolan TW. Increasing efficiency and enhancing value in health care: ways to achieve savings in operating costs per year. IHI Innovation Series white paper. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2009. (Available on www.IHI.org)</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shah, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.27</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.27</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[27 Bringing quality and finance together - evaluating cost impact of quality improvement work]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A19</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A20-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[28 Blueprint for excellence - designing and refining your management system]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A20-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Adopting a quality improvement approach isn&rsquo;t sufficient; it must be integrated into a robust management system that equips both staff and leaders with a simple, holistic framework for managing work and delivering the organization&rsquo;s strategy. But initiating the design and construction of such a management system can be daunting. Where do you start?</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>Developing a management system begins with a systematic assessment of an organization&rsquo;s strengths, opportunities and readiness to embrace a more holistic management system. Every organization has some elements of a management system in place already &ndash; they may just not be well developed, in good balance, or integrated &ndash; but there is always going to be some way of managing daily work, some way of planning and some way of gaining assurance.</p><p>Key to the long-term journey of building a management system is taking an assets-based approach, identifying existing strengths and developing plans to integrate and strengthen these. Being able to describe and communicate the elements of the management system in simple language, that helps people make sense of their work and the purpose of different types of work that they do, is core to the purpose of management systems. This is then brought to life through leadership practices, and the leadership standard work (rituals, routines and habits) that will nurture a culture of high performance.</p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Shah A. How to move beyond quality improvement projects. <I>BMJ</I> 2020;<b>370</b>:m2319 (Published 27 July 2020) http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2319</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shah, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.28</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.28</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[28 Blueprint for excellence - designing and refining your management system]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A20</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A20</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A20-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[29 Debate - this house believes quality improvement is insufficient to tackle the challenges of today and tomorrow]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A20-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><p>Improvement science is insufficient for addressing the challenges we face in health and care today. While improvement science has its merits, it falls short in several critical areas.</p><p>Firstly, there is a significant lack of evidence supporting the effectiveness of improvement science. A comprehensive review published two years ago in the International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences examined over 5,000 articles and more than 100 studies spanning two decades. Shockingly, it found that 50% of quality improvement (QI) efforts failed. We simply cannot afford such a high failure rate if we are to rely on improvement science to solve today&rsquo;s pressing health and care challenges.</p><p>Secondly, even when improvement science does succeed, its successes are often limited to local levels. Think about it&mdash;how many successful scale-up initiatives can you name that have taken an effective bundle of interventions from one site and reliably scaled them across an entire health system, region, or country? I bet you can count them on one hand. This is not good enough. The solutions to our challenges may exist in local services, but what use are they if we cannot scale and spread them effectively?</p><p>Moreover, while improvement science excels at bringing people together to consider factors they can influence and generate ideas to test, this approach is increasingly inadequate. We need different types of interventions&mdash;greater focus on innovation, changes in policy or statute, such as implementing a sugar tax to tackle obesity, and redistribution of funding. These are the kinds of bold actions required to make a real impact.</p><p>Finally, the only way we will truly tackle the challenges in health and care is by leveraging game-changers. We need to shift our focus from merely treating illness or optimizing service delivery to creating health. Technological solutions, including big data, precision medicine, and artificial intelligence, hold immense potential. Additionally, we must engage in coproduction with our communities and partner agencies far beyond the borders of traditional healthcare.</p><p>In conclusion, while improvement science has its place, it is insufficient for the complex and evolving challenges we face today. We must embrace innovation, policy change, and technological advancements to create a healthier future for all.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shah, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.29</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.29</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[29 Debate - this house believes quality improvement is insufficient to tackle the challenges of today and tomorrow]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A20</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A20</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A20-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[30 International forum on quality and safety in healthcare, Utrecht 2025]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A20-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Human Factors aim to understand the &lsquo;fit&rsquo; between staff and their environment and includes equipment design, processes, communication, teamworking, leadership and organisational culture. Understanding these principles results in reduced human error and positive results on quality of care and patient safety. The NHS Patient Safety Syllabus highlight Human Factors as a core theme of its training for all NHS staff.<sup>1</sup> Despite this, we were unable to identify any interprofessional Human Factors training courses in Wales. We aimed to fill that education gap by developing, implementing and evaluating a one day, free to attend, multi-speciality, interprofessional Human Factors course.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A multi-disciplinary Human Factors course was created and delivered by a faculty with varied backgrounds. The one-day course included an introductory lecture, themed workshops and discussion about practical applications using pre-filmed simulations. A pre-course handbook and online platform facilitated consolidation of learning.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>To date, we have run five courses with a total of 143 attendees including 76 doctors, 45 nurses, three pharmacists, three midwives, two physician associates, two physiotherapists and others. All attendees completed pre- and post-course questionnaires.</p><p>67% reported having minimal or no prior human factors teaching, clearly identifying the need for education. Confidence about human factors increased by 73% (13% to 86%) and awareness of the impact of human factors increased by 42% (53% to 95%) following the course. Qualitative feedback suggested that the course was well delivered, engaging, and interesting and the learning would help attendees improve their clinical areas and share their knowledge.</p></sec><sec><st>Discussion and Conclusion</st><p>This interprofessional multi-speciality Human Factors course has proven its usefulness and value for all healthcare professionals working within the Health Board. Its inter-professional nature has strengthened the learning that attendees gained and proved that Human Factors really are everyone&rsquo;s problem. Detailed feedback will be analysed in order to improve upon the courses foundations and further courses will open this education to more Health Board staff.</p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. <I>National Patient Safety Syllabus. Version 2.1. Commissioned by Health Education England.</I>  <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url"> https://www.hee.nhs.uk/our-work/patient-safety</inter-ref> [Accessed 13th March 2025]</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alcock, A., Addy, C., Al-Mudhaffar, M., Cotter, M., Dunne, J., Hall, A., Jenkins, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.30</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.30</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[30 International forum on quality and safety in healthcare, Utrecht 2025]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A20</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A21</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A22-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[32 Project INCLUDE: reducing social isolation & loneliness in older adults]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A22-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Loneliness among older adults is a pressing public health issue with significant mental and physical health implications (2). This project, funded by the Michigan Health Endowment Fund and conducted in collaboration with the Presbyterian Villages of Michigan (PVM) and Central Michigan University (CMU), aims to assess and address loneliness and social isolation in senior living communities. Given the challenges staff face in implementing psychosocial interventions, this initiative seeks to identify at-risk individuals and pilot targeted interventions to enhance social connectedness.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A 41-item survey, including a UCLA loneliness inventory (1), to assess loneliness and social isolation was distributed to all residents of PVM villages, yielding 149 responses. Individuals were categorized as experiencing high social isolation and loneliness (SIL) if they rated their social connectedness below five and loneliness above five on a 1&ndash;10 scale. CMU faculty, students, and staff collaborated to analyze responses and conduct interventions. Across 35 available PVM locations, 20 sites chose to participate in informational sessions and in person survey collection. Group-based psychosocial education programs were piloted at five interested communities. The impact of these interventions was evaluated through a single arm pre-post design, measuring changes in loneliness before and after participation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of the 149 survey responses, 32 met the criteria for high SIL and were invited to participate in interventions. Analysis indicated that loneliness is negatively correlated with perceived mental health (r = -0.53, p &lt; 0.001) and perceived physical well-being (r = -0.33, p &lt; 0.001). Challenges included geographic dispersion of PVM villages and older adults&rsquo; limited familiarity with technology-based interventions. Initial findings suggest that structured group-based programs may reduce loneliness. Regular coordination between CMU and PVM staff has facilitated intervention implementation and assessment. CBT-based loneliness education and reduction classes have been implemented at three distinct PVM sites. These classes utilize a semi-virtual format where clinical psychology students teach classes via video conferencing software and PVM residents gather in person at their site of residence to engage with the student all on the same screen. Additional classes have been entirely through video conferencing and older adults have all joined independently from different devices. Future efforts should focus on expanding outreach and refining intervention strategies to enhance accessibility and efficacy.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Russell D, Peplau LA, Ferguson ML. Developing a measure of loneliness. <I>J Pers Assess</I>. 1978;<b>42</b>(3):290&ndash;294. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4203_11</p></li><li><p>Wang F, Gao Y, Han Z. <I>et al.</I> A systematic review and meta-analysis of 90 cohort studies of social isolation, loneliness and mortality. <I>Nat Hum Behav</I> 2023;<b>7</b>:1307&ndash;1319. doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01617-6</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forrest, A., Brugh, C., Jepsen, A., Gerhart, J., Skeel, R., Pandey, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.32</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.32</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[32 Project INCLUDE: reducing social isolation & loneliness in older adults]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A22</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A22</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A22-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[33 How many puffs? Phasing out salbutamol weaning plans following episodes of acute wheeze]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A22-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Guidance on taking salbutamol after an episode of acute wheeze has changed in recent years. Traditionally, families were given salbutamol &lsquo;weaning plans&rsquo; on discharge. These consisted of regular salbutamol on discharge, gradually weaning the number of puffs or increasing time between puffs. This can have detrimental effects; encouraging regular use of a potentially toxic medication and disempowering families to recognise signs of deterioration<sup>1</sup>. Therefore guidance has changed to giving 2&ndash;6 puffs of salbutamol as required up to every 4 hours, seeking medical attention if more regular salbutamol is required<sup>2,3</sup>. Doctors are not all aware of this change, therefore families receive varied advice on discharge. This is confusing for families and could lead to poor recognition of deterioration.</p><p>The aim of this project was for all junior doctors in the paediatric department to advise to give salbutamol as required on discharge rather than giving a weaning plan by March 2023.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A process map and fishbone diagram were used to understand the process of discharging patients with acute wheeze and potential problems in the process. A survey was distributed amongst the team to gain baseline data of the advice being given to families on discharge.</p><p>After finding that only 53% of junior doctors were giving the correct advice of taking salbutamol as required on discharge, change ideas were explored to increase this and improve consistency of advice given. The change ideas were translated into the following Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles, which were implemented over 4 months between October 2022 and February 2023:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Educating staff through a presentation at Grand Round, presenting survey findings and reminding them of our local guidelines and the discharge advice we should be giving</p></li><li><p>Introducing a point on the wheeze discharge checklist to remind people of the correct advice for salbutamol use after discharge</p></li><li><p>Running a simulation scenario of discharging a young person with asthma, with reflections from the staff following the scenario</p></li><li><p>Reminders of discharge advice via email and whatsapp groups</p></li></l></p><p>Doctors were surveyed regularly throughout the project on the advice given to families on discharge with regards to salbutamol use, which was translated into a run chart.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The number of junior doctors providing the correct advice of taking salbutamol as required on discharge gradually increased from 53% to 92% following the PDSA cycles. There was one run of 6 data points above the median baseline followed by a run of 8 data points indicating a statistically significant improvement. Making multiple small changes over time resulted in greater improvement than any standalone change. Involving the local team ensured that they were also invested in generating change.</p><p>Consistent advice on salbutamol use after discharge will reduce confusion amongst families, empower them to manage their child at home, and reduce potential toxic effects of salbutamol overuse.</p></sec><sec><st>References</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Martin J, Townshend J, Brodlie M. Diagnosis and management of asthma in children. <I>BMJ Paediatrics Open</I> 2022 Apr;<b>6</b>(1):e001277. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001277.</p></li><li><p>The Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention, Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA), 2022. Available from: <inter-ref locator="" locator-type="url">http://www.ginasthma.org</inter-ref>.</p></li><li><p>NWL Children&rsquo;s Asthma Network. Acute asthma guideline, version 1, June 2021_Appendix 2.</p></li></l></p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wesson, R., Ajitsaria, R., Davey, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.33</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.33</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[33 How many puffs? Phasing out salbutamol weaning plans following episodes of acute wheeze]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A22</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A23</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A23-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[34 Nursing experience of a patient following minimally invasive mitral valve repair with postoperative stroke]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A23-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>This article describes a 50-year-old female patient diagnosed with severe mitral regurgitation who underwent minimally invasive mitral valve repair. Postoperatively, she developed complications, including left-sided limb weakness due to a stroke. She was observed in the intensive care unit from October 23, 2024, to October 27, 2024.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Using Gordon&rsquo;s eleven functional health patterns as a guide, data were collected through direct care, conversations, physical assessments, and medical record reviews. The analysis established that the patient had health issues related to acute pain (associated with the postoperative wound), activity intolerance (related to left-sided limb weakness), and anxiety (concerned about recovery of bodily functions not meeting expectations).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>This nursing experience serves as a reference for clinical nursing staff caring for similar cases, enhancing nursing quality.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>In the nursing process, patient-centered care was implemented through medication management and non-pharmacological supportive measures&mdash;using a small pillow to press on the surgical wound (right chest) during activities to alleviate postoperative pain. Through interdisciplinary collaboration with a rehabilitation therapist, a rehabilitation plan was developed to assist with both active and passive joint movements, maintaining limb function and preventing physical decline. Due to left-sided limb weakness, the patient was prone to negative emotions such as anxiety and unease. Active caring was employed to encourage her to express her feelings, provide timely positive reinforcement, stimulate her motivation for rehabilitation, and enhance her self-confidence while learning self-care abilities. Through individualized nursing care and collaborative interdisciplinary support, the overall physical, mental, and spiritual care of the patient was effectively improved.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[YI Lin, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.34</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.34</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[34 Nursing experience of a patient following minimally invasive mitral valve repair with postoperative stroke]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A23</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A23</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A23-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[35 Improving efficiency of outpatient consultations by reducing no-show numbers]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A23-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The quality and accessibility of the Dutch healthcare system are under increasing pressure. There is a growing demand for healthcare services due to factors like an ageing population and an increase in the number of chronically ill people. Unfortunately, we also have to deal with a chronic staff shortage. One of the solutions is a greater efficiency aiming at providing more healthcare with the same amount of resources and numbers of staff. In 2023, 6.4% of our patients (which means 3314 patients) did not come to their appointment on the outpatient clinic (no show).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim</st><p>Our aim was to improve the attendance to the clinic to increase efficiency and save costs.</p><p>We analysed the distribution of no-show patients among the internal medicine subspecialties. 3.3% of the oncology patients, 4.7% of the haematology, 4.7% of the nephrology and 9.2% of the endocrinology patients did not show-up.</p></sec><sec><st>Interventions</st><p>Almost all our patients have to draw blood before an appointment. Patients who do not visit the lab usually do not come to their appointment as well. We hypothesized that a possible intervention could be to call these patients to remind them on their appointment.</p><p>To deal with staff shortage, we introduced Robotic Process Automation (RPA). Patients can schedule their appointments without intervention from hospital employees through RPA. They receive a lab form via their electronic patient record (mijn ASZ) with instructions. Medical assistants check if lab results are present a few days before the scheduled appointment. A telephone team was established in July 2024 to call patients with missing lab results in the evening. They were asked to draw blood and were reminded on their appointment. We measured no-show numbers monthly, before and after our intervention and performed a student&rsquo;s T-Test.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>From July &ndash;December 2024 our telephone team reached 1746 (61.2%) patients and left a voicemail for 878 (30.7%) patients. 230 (8.1%) patients were not reached at all. Reported reasons for not drawing blood: lack of a computer or login codes, not having received lab forms, difficulty accessing lab forms or being unaware of the appointment.</p><p>We measured a significant reduction of no-show numbers after our intervention (N=1558 in Q 3+4 2023 versus N=1168 in Q 3+4 in 2024; p&lt; 0.005, <cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>). We calculated that our outpatient clinic capacity increased with 97.5 hrs. We calculated that we gained  117.000 by reducing no-show numbers, while the costs of the telephone team were  13.995.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 35 Table 1</no><caption><p>No show numbers before (quarter 3+4 2023) and after (2024) intervention * p&lt;0.005</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Q 3 + 4 2023</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Q 3 + 4 2024</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c></r><r><c cspan="4" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Total patients (N) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">25057 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">30226 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">No-show patients (N): </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1558 (6%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1168 (4%)* </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&ndash;390 (&ndash;25%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&bull; New patients (N) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">208 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">147 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&ndash;61 (&ndash;29%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&bull; follow-up patients (N) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1350 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1021 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&ndash;329 (&ndash;24%) </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>No-show numbers can be reduced with a special telephone team and appropriate selection of patients. RPA can help to improve processes in health care, but we have to keep in mind not all patients are digitally skilled.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Massolt, E. T., van der Glas-Schmidt, F., van de Weijgert, E.-J., Reijerink, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.35</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.35</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[35 Improving efficiency of outpatient consultations by reducing no-show numbers]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A23</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A24</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A25-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[37 The road to minimizing waste in the review of potential critical patient incidents by patient safety specialists]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A25-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Hospitals have a responsibility to identify and learn from reported patient safety incidents. At University Health Network (UHN), a multi-site academic health sciences centre in Ontario, Canada, critical incidents undergo an in-depth review with the central Quality &amp; Safety (Q&amp;S) team. A high volume of incident reports are reported annually, and those that are potential critical incidents require an in-depth review with Patient Safety Specialists (PSS) from the Q&amp;S team. The healthcare human resource and funding challenges prevalent in the healthcare sector have also impacted the Q&amp;S team, limiting the number of PSSs available to lead these reviews. There was an opportunity to eliminate waste in the review process and better utilize the skills of the PSSs within the central Q&amp;S team to support organizational quality improvement efforts.</p><p>This project aimed to decrease the number of patient incident reports PSSs review by 40% over ten months (from February to November 2024) while continuing to identify potential critical incidents.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The project design is an interrupted time series using Lean methods. A diagnostic review of the incident review process was conducted using Value Stream Mapping, Value-Add Analysis, and 5-Whys Analysis. 14 change ideas were developed to eliminate process waste and produce system-level change according to the Hierarchy of Intervention Effectiveness (HIE). The main change idea was to reduce the daily review of incidents by PSSs to patient outcome categories most likely to be critical incidents and cross-check reported incidents weekly as a safeguard. Project data was analyzed with statistical process control p-Charts and followed established rules for differentiating between common and special cause variation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>  <I>Outcome measure:</I> There was a 93.4% average percent decrease in the patient incident reports reviewed weekly by PSSs with special cause variation and sustained improvement (greater than 20 weeks) identified, that supports the updated criteria for incident report review by PSSs.</p><p>  <I>Process measure:</I> There was a 62.6% average percent decrease in the follow-up emails sent to clinical partners each week by PSSs with special cause variation and sustained improvement (greater than 20 weeks) identified.</p><p>  <I>Balancing measure:</I> The non-critical incidents undergoing formal review each week remained stable over 12 weeks.</p><p>  <I>Balancing Measure:</I> A projected 66,000&ndash;83,000 CAD in operational cost savings could be redirected to other department priorities due to improved efficiencies.</p><p>The application of Lean methods to the patient incident review process by PSSs achieved the project&rsquo;s aim of decreasing the number of patient incident reports PSSs review while continuing to identify potential critical incidents. All 14 change ideas developed for this project have a greater likelihood of being sustained because they are system-focused according to the HIE and have been built into the standard work for PSSs leading incident reviews. Eliminating process waste from the incident review process should increase PSSs&rsquo; capacity to engage in other important work such as quality improvement and Safety-II activities.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lan, M., Lam, J., Robinson, S., Pozzobon, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.37</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.37</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[37 The road to minimizing waste in the review of potential critical patient incidents by patient safety specialists]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A25</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A25</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A25-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[38 Giving residents a voice in residential care homes policy: large scale measurement on quality of life combining research and practice in Flanders]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/14/Suppl_3/A25-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>In 2011 a new decretal policy was published for residential care homes in Flanders: every 3 years experience measurements should take place to involve residents and families in quality policy. It remains a challenge to do so, due to increasing care needs and cognitive impairment in this population.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>The Flemish Institute for Quality of Care, the Flemish Council of Older Persons, and the Flemish Expertise Centre in Dementia together with the umbrella organisations of residential care homes and the Department of Care of the Flemish Government, initiated the development of a new tailored national measurement strategy to give care homes the tools to enhance resident ownership and participation in quality and organisation of living in these homes.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We use validated scientific methods to gain insight in quality of life and care. For residents with no to mild cognitive impairment and for next-of-kin, we use the InterRAI Self Reported Quality of Life questionnaire. We train (mostly senior) volunteers to visit nursing homes and collect the data in this group of residents. For residents with mild to severe cognitive impairment we use the Qualidem observation method. We composed a strategic council of caregivers and users to give input in the methods used, the usefulness of results for quality improvement and tailored implementation strategies on a national level.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In the first part of 2024 we trained about 500 elderly volunteers to visit care homes and collect data of 4000 residents on quality of life and care. By engaging committed volunteers, we connect the living environment of residents and (senior) citizens and make residents feel comfortable to share their experience. By May 2025, we will have results of all 400 participating nursing homes and approximately 8000 residents. Preliminary results show good experience of residents in privacy (Bottom (i.e. &lsquo;Never/rarely&rsquo;): 2.9%; Middle (i.e. &lsquo;Sometimes&rsquo;): 5.4%; Top (i.e. &lsquo;Most of the time/Always&rsquo;): 91.7%), meals (Bottom: 11.9%; Middle: 12.1%; Top: 76.1%), respect from staff (Bottom: 3.6%; Middle: 8.4%; Top: 88.0%) and safety (Bottom: 3.6%; Middle: 5.9%; Top: 90.5%). Less good experience was noted for activities (Bottom: 37.9%; Middle: 16.9%; Top: 45.2%), making friends (Bottom: 47.7%; Middle: 20.3%; Top: 32.0%) and relationship with caregivers (Bottom: 39.0%; Middle: 23.3%; Top: 37.7%). All care homes receive a feedback report with individual results and overall means for Flanders. In the second part of 2024 we will question next of kins on their experience in care homes. In 2025 we will implement the Qualidem observation technique for residents with cognitive impairment.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>In co-creation and by combining validated scientific methods, we will be able to gather information on quality of life and care in residential homes, despite the increasing care needs and cognitive impairment. Using trained volunteers is a great added value for all participants involved. Overall, residents and family can be encouraged to participate in the organisation and policy of residential care homes. Hence the experienced quality of the living environment and the feeling of ownership can be enhanced for older persons in Flanders and beyond.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leemans, K., Haes, R. D., Steen, F. V. d., Dheedene, M., Deneckere, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-19T05:11:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-QSHU.38</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjqir;bmjoq-2025-QSHU.38</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[38 Giving residents a voice in residential care homes policy: large scale measurement on quality of life combining research and practice in Flanders]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A25</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A26</prism:endingPage>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>